Delivery cost (freight) for finished goods

All SAP Gurus,
We are supplying finished goods to our customers (against sales order).
The delivery cost (freight) for this is beared by us, so payment to transporter's are made by us.
For making payment to transporters, we are raising service PO.
Is there any link between sales order and service PO or between service entry sheet and sales order?
because there are chances that transporter may send us two bills against same sales order.
Regards,

not answered.

Similar Messages

Cost estimate for Finished goods

Hi SAP guru
While Posting billing Document from SD to FI, I am getting error as mention below
" The system tried to read the product cost estimate for product 20000050 using the costing variant YPC1 and the costing version 01.
However, the product cost estimate has the status KF, which means that it contains errors. Therefore the cost estimate is not valid."
Kindly suggest any solution
Regards
FI

Hi Friend,
For that product you dont have the valid cost estimate, that's why the recent cost was not updated to the material master. And at the same time, system is telling that you have a standard cost estimate with errors. Go to CKR1 and remove the cost estimate and create a new one without erros. Then post billing document.
Sateesh Kumar

Invoice Verification for Planned Delivery Cost (Freight Vendor)

Dear all
I have created the PO with vendor A for material M and the freight vendor is B. And now I would like to know invoice posting for vendor A for mateiral M and Vendor B for freight.
During PO creation:
1. I enter the Vendor A for PO.
2. I maintain Freight Condition at the Header Condition. And enter the freight Vendor B for that Condition.
During GR:
1. GR with reference to this PO
During Invoice:
1. MIRO reference to this PO
    (a) To do Invoice for Vendor A, select Goods and Service and post
    (b) Subsequently, MIRO reference PO again, and do invoice for Freight Vendor B, select Planned
         Delivery Cost
Questions:
(a) What is the G/L account posting during GR and Invoice? I am particularly interested in the Invoice G/L account posting for both different vendor, assuming I am using the standard sap Account Determination Setting
(b) Instead of following the above approach to do invoice twice for different vendor A & B, can I first Invoice reference PO for Vendor A, and then subsequently use Subsequent Debit reference PO?
Points will be awarded handsomely.
thanks

Hello
Purchase order: 100 pcs @ 1.3/pc
Planned delivery costs: 0.10/pc
Goods receipt for that PO: 100 pc
A/C postings @ GR
Stock account: 140 Dr
GR/IR clearing: 130 Cr
Freight clearing: 10 Cr
Invoice 100 pc @ 1.3/pc=130.00
      freight @ 0.10/pc= 10.00
          Total =140.00
A/C posting @ IR
Vendor a/c's: 140 Cr (130 for Goods vendor and 10 for freight vendor)
GR/IR clearing: 130 Dr
Freight clearing: 10 Dr
Since both are different vendors you have to credit the goods value to vendor A and freight charges to vendor B, you have to do them separately.
Regards
Gregory Mathews

How to get unit cost for finished goods in prod order

HI all,
IN a production order of type PP04, there is cost analysis you can get from CO03. This shows the cost for finished goods and BOM components. Would anyone know how the cost for finished goods are calculated ? The issue i have is that the unit cost of the finished goods is not correct. It is higher than what it should be. I looked at the moving avg price at material master but the cost used in calculation is different than in material master. Can anyone shed light how finished goods are calculated and why it is picking up a higher unit cost ? Where is the higher cost coming from for finished goods material as shown in CO03 ? The BOM materials are picking unit cost correctly. Would this have anything to do with cost settlement ?
thank you.
joyce

Hi,
Finished goods price will depend on BOM componenet price, activity price and overhead price. Check whether this prices are picking correctly or not.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Split valuation for Finished Goods - Target cost was not updated

Hi,
We are following split valuation for 'Finished goods'.
Valuation typte 1 is for 'manufacture' and
Valuation type 2 is for 'External procurement'
For production orders with this material, we are not getting target costs. It is showing zero.
We have done release of standard cost estimate before creation of production orders and goods receipt for these orders. But still it is not updating.
Pls guide me.
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
At the time of variance calculation only the credit part of target cost will update and at the time of goods receipt debit part of the target cost will update.
Our client has done goods receipt but debit part of the target cost was not updated. and the order status is DLV.
I simulated the scenario in QAS by creating new finished goods materials (Industry-Construction) one is with split valuation and another is without split valuation, then the debit part of target cost was updated at the time of goods receipt and credit part was updated at the time of variance calculation for both the materials. So this problem was not arised because of split valuation.
Was this problem arising because of the material master data, because for one material it is updating and for another it is not for the same configuration?
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta
Edited by: gms gupta on Oct 22, 2011 3:39 PM
Edited by: gms gupta on Oct 22, 2011 3:41 PM

Third Party Order Delivery Costs ( COGS for Purchasing)

Hello Experts
We have a Scenario where in its a 3rd Party Order direct shipment Process where the Shipping is done by a Logistics Vendor!
So->PR>PO>Inbound Del->GR->IR>Goods Issue-->Customer Invoice.
Now the Issue we have is Delivery Costs(Freight,Insurance,Duty etc) raised by Logistics vendor are taken as estimated costs during the PO creation with appropriate Condition Types but when at the end of the Month when Actual bill is sent the Prices are to be settled and paid back!!
2)Assuming vendor invoice of $100 and Freight invoice of $10. The accounting entries aare as follows:
Vendor 100-
GIT(Goods in Transit) 100
Fright Forwarder 10-
GIT 10
Since the Stock is Non Valuated here how can Account postings from PO/GR is shown for COGS in SAP.
Understood that COGS is hit when Goods Issue(GI) is done but our need is to account COGS in Purchasing.
Can anybody throw some idea of how to Capture the COGS in PO and post then individually with different G/L accts for Freight,Insurance etc.
Full points guaranteed heheheh! Pls help me with your expert suggestions.
Regards,
Hari'
Singapore

Hi Suraj,
Thankx for your reply and sorry for my delayed reply.
Well your answer is too immature for me to apply since I have already done all those and surpassed those things.
Well to make my question simple I need to account Delivery Costs(Freight,Insurance etc) during GR.Although I have setup all the COnd types in PO Pricing.Now I need to know since GR is Statistical and Goods are in Transit can I account the Delivery Costs into seperate G/L acounts??
It would be great if any of the Forum ppl have already setup capturing of the Delivery Costs in PURCHASING and accounting them into Sepate a/c's. I feel this is Common Scenario in most of the Mfg Org. So knowledge transfer is higly appreciated!!
Rgds,
Hari

No delivery costs exist for purchase order

Dear Friends,
While doing MIRO, i am getting an error message as mentioned below----
"No delivery costs exist for purchase order xxxxxxxxx"
Message no. M8014.
Kindly guide me in resolving the error.
Thanks & Regards,

hi
>"No delivery costs exist for purchase order xxxxxxxxx"
itself says that there is no delivery cost,
firstly check ur PO ,Did u entere the delivery cost conditions like for freight or octoi in the PO
or if u have entered the condition then check if it is not already invoiced
if u dont have delivery cost in po and wanna do IV for material then in miro
change the option of delivery cost to goods/service
(at right side of the po no field)
regards
kunal

Planned delivery costs (Freight) vendor into an access sequence

Hello,
Our MM users want to maintain a price condition record where they would be able to maintain a cost/ton based on effective dates.
The objective is to maintain a price condition record based on the following criteria: PO header vendor, material, and planned delivery costs (freight) vendor so that they would not have to maintain prices manually in the PO (this price would come directly from the condition record).
However, there is no standard field available to create an access sequence in which the freight vendor (KOMV-LIFNR) could be included. Indeed the field LIFNR is available but I guess it refers to the PO header vendor.
Is it still possible to create such an access sequence? What do you think of this requirement?
Thanks,
Annabelle R.

Hello Annabelle,
Raw material vendor A + Raw material A + Truck company A =» Price A
Raw material vendor A + Raw material A + Truck company B =» Price B
can yo please explain the meaning of "Raw material vendor A" stands for what price?
As far as i know, freight cost could easily included in the material cost, because in m/06, there are so many cost that are on quantity basis and are included in the material basis, just make a copy of anyone of them and add it to you pricing procedure as well as supplementry pricing procedure, or else you can directly make a condition record in MEK1 for this condition.
please try it hope it helps
Regards,
yk

Kanban for finished goods (discrete manufacturing)

Hi gurus,
I am using kanban for finished goods(with MRP) to triggers production order(discrete manufacturing). If i set the status "empty" system is creating a planned order directly. It is not coming for MRP run. I suppose, that planned order should be created through MRP run(since i am using kanban with MRP). Can you please tell what settings i need to be checked?
Regards
Rajib Pathak

Hi,
Pls. find details about settings for KANBAN With MRP:
KANBAN With MRP
Prerequisites
In this process, the storage location assigned to the supply area is not excluded from MRP.
If a material is planned and procured with MRP, you must make the following settings:
You must maintain a valid MRP type for the material. This means, the setting "ND" (No planning) is not allowed.
You must maintain all other control parameters required for MRP for the material.
You must maintain a repetitive manufacturing profile (in the MRP data screen) for replenishment strategies with a cost collector (in-house production with run schedule quantities, manual KANBAN). In the SAP standard system, a profile is available that is specially intended for KANBAN, that is, using this profile, the system creates a cost collector without a run schedule header.
Features
Here, the total production quantity or the procurement quantities of a certain period are planned in the planning run and the replenishment elements are also created in the planning run. For in-house production, you can use either Repetitive Manufacturing or production orders to plan the production quantities per period. For external procurement, all the standard replenishment elements are available. The replenishment elements created in the planning run, however, are not intended to trigger production or replenishment directly. Instead, they exist to provide the supply source with a preview. Actual production and material flow are controlled and triggered by setting the kanban to FULL and EMPTY. Backflushes and goods receipts are posted with no reference to the kanban. This means that you can backflush daily quantities, for example.
In this procedure, the following is valid for materials with BOMs:
Components that are used in KANBAN materials can be planned using any one of the MRP procedures. However, the system has to be organized so that the supply source does not produce the material for the replenishment element created in MRP immediately but awaits the kanban request.
As the system creates preview data in the procedure with MRP, it is particularly useful for replenishment with run schedule quantities (Repetitive Manufacturing) and scheduling agreement releases.
HOpe this helps.
Regards,
Tejas

If Excise invoice required for finished goods.

Hi All
I have doubt, whether excise invoice is required for finished goods or not. As I am trying to create MIGO doc for PO of finished material, and it is saying, no excise invoice possible for finished material RG1.
Can you advise please.
Regards
Mukta

HI
Thanks for this. When we are executing Utilization transaction J2IU, it is giving dump after prompting popup with 'Data will be lost PLA NCCD B35', 'No record selected , excise invoice cancelled'.
Run time error is saying -
Short text
    Structure-type conflict when calling a FORM
What happened?
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "J_1IRUTZ" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_TYPE', was
not caught and
therefore caused a runtime error.
The reason for the exception is:
The call of the FORM "DETERMINE_DEFAULT_VALUES" is incorrect:
The actual parameter no. 2 is at PERFORM not compatible with the
structure type requested by FORM "DETERMINE_DEFAULT_VALUES".
The FORM "DETERMINE_DEFAULT_VALUES" is defined in program "SAPMJ1II".
This error occurs in Unicode if the fragment view of the types is
incompatible.
Can some one suggest if we need to apply any OSS NOTE.
Regards
Mukta

Validation of batch nos. in migo for finished goods (fert)

I want to validate batch number entered by user at the time of migo for finished goods (fert) against the batchs in mcha. how can i do this? also is it possible to give f4 help to user for available bach nos. for the particular material ?

Hi,
Cannot you use message M7 668 for this purpose?
Problem is "batch has been already posted in stock"
Regards,
Csaba

PO for Finished Goods with Tax Code - Inventorise

Hi All,
Our Client is procuring Finished Goods from Domestic Vendor & Excise Duty is paid to the Vendor for that i am defining the tax code in PO. Over here For the Finished Good in Tax Code it is not capturing - (Condition Type - JMO2). I have checked it in PO for ROH, HALB tax code is working perfectly with (Condition Type - JMO2). I like to know will it work for finished goods or not. In J1ID i have maintained Excise Rate.
I had followed the following steps.
1) Material code- Chapter id maintained in J1ID
2) Vendor code excisable in J1ID
3) Maintain condition record in FV11 for the correct validity period
4) Check the PO creation date whcih should fall between condition record validity period
Every thing is maintained i have checked it Thoroughly fot this particular material i am not getting it. This one is a finished goods material.
I am not able to identify what is happening.
I will give the flow so that you can help me out.
1. Created Material - Finished with all views except - Classification, Forecasting,
Work Scheduling & QM
2. Create Info Record - Tax Code given
3. J1ID - Chapter ID, Chap ID with Material, *** Val for Mat, Vendor Excise Detail, Excise ind. for Plant, Excise ind. for Plant & Vendor, & Excise Tax Rate.
4. FV11 - Maintained till - 31.12.9999.
5. FTXP - Tax Code is Maintained & it's working fine with other PO.
6. ME21N - PO is done for Domestic vendor with Standard PO With no condition & With only tax code for ED & CST.
7. In J1ID cenvat determination has been maintained.
Also the material type should be raw in material chapter id combination instead of RG1 even though the material is finished to take credit of excise it should be maintained as RAW .
Over Here if i see i am not able to capture (JMO2 A/P Eduty for Inven 0.000%) &
For Sale tax i have maintained it in FTXP as (A/P C Sales Tax Inv NVV 12.500% JIP1) but it is not appering in PO Tax code. I can See the sale tax is geting updated in Tax code for Inventorise if i give it with out ED in tax code. With ED it is not Appering in Taxcode.
Can you help me resolving the issue.
Once again thanks for youre help.
Thanks in Advance,
sapuser.
Edited by: sapuser on Dec 26, 2008 10:10 AM

Hi All,
Just give a check by entering cenvat determination table. System checks this by default for excise details. Enter i/p and o/p material as same.
Hope this will resolve you Problem,
Pherasath

Uploading Production Requirements For Finished Goods From External System To Run MRP For Components in SAP.

Hello Production Planning experts,
I'm looking to solve the current business problem:
The company bought a third party software (JD Edwards) to calculate production requirements instead of using SAP's standard Production Planning or a tool like SAP's APO. They run a batch job to query Sales Orders, Deliveries, available stock, stock in transit, etc. from sap and feed/upload it to the third party software so it can calculate the Finished Goods Production Requirements for them. They love the third party software, so replacing it is not an option. Since the third party software is already taking into account Sales Orders, Deliveries, available stock, stock in transit, etc. from SAP, it just outputs a "Finished Goods Production Schedule" by week.
My questions are:
1) What's the best way to upload something like that in SAP in the form of Planned Orders or something of that nature?
After i get that schedule in SAP:
2) Is there any way to calculate components' requirements for that "Finished Goods Production Schedule" alone? The company would like to IGNORE existing stock AND expected-goods-issues in the future (sales orders, deliveries, etc) for Finished Goods ONLY. The components calculations would work the standard MRP way, taking into account existing stock and AND expected-goods-issues in the future (sales orders, deliveries, etc)
I started looking into Master Production Schedule (MPS), but I don't know if that's the right approach since I'm not very familiar with it.
Thanks in Advance! I will gladly reward points for helpful/correct answers.

Hello Oscar
I suggest you to upload your production plan in the for of "Planned Independent Requirements" using BAPI BAPI_REQUIREMENTS_CREATE. Later, MRP will create planned orders to cover the PIRs.
If you don't want to consider the existing stock of the finished product, you should use the planning strategy 11 to create your PIRs. Take a look on the following link for more details about this planning strategy:
Gross Requirements Planning (11) - Demand Management (PP-MP-DEM) - SAP Library
Here you will find the following information:
The make-to-stock strategy gross requirements planning is particularly useful in mass production environments; it is often combined with repetitive manufacturing. This strategy is particularly useful if you need to produce, regardless of whether you have stock or not. For instance, steel or cement producers might want to use this strategy because they cannot shut down production; a blast furnace or a cement factory must continue to produce, even if this means having to produce to stock.
This strategy is also frequently used if there is a Material Requirements Planning system in a legacy system that needs to be linked to an SAP system which serves as a production execution system. The legacy system calculates a specific production plan, which has to be executed, regardless of the stock situation in the SAP system
It looks like this planning strategy is exactly what you are looking for.
BR
Caetano

Discontinuity and Follow-up Materials for Finish Goods

Dear all,
We have used for a long time the Discontinuity functionality and Follow-up Materials for Raw and Packaging materials (components in BOMs).
We would like to use the same functionalities for Finish Goods, but after setting fields in MRP4 View, it seems not to work as it did for components.
Is it possible to reproduce the same effect in Finish Goods as we had with components, i.e., use some kind of Discontinuity and Follow-up materials for Finish Goods?
We currently work with R/3 V.4.7.
Thank you all in advance for any support.
Best Regards,
Alberto

Dear Alberto,
If my understanding is correct then this discontinued material concept works only for the components and not for the finished
product during MRP.
Discontinuation Data Use
In MRP, the discontinuation functionality is used to transfer dependent requirements of a component to one or several follow-up
materials, if the requirements are no longer covered by stock. You can also define a follow-up material in the bill of material.
Check this link to explore more.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/b1/c044d1439a11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Re: Automatic Reorder point Planning for Finished Goods

Hi All,
I have some doubts regrading the Automatic Reorder point Planning for Finished Goods.
For testing purpose I have entered the consumption values for two month.
Say :
Nov-08=13
Dec-08=20
ROL level=5
Safety stock =4
Model =constant
Now when I execute the forecasting,The system gives me the forcast for the next two month jan & Feb.
But when I run the MRP I see planned order for 5.So how to fulfill my forecast for jan?
Please Advice.
Regards,
Vivek

Hi Brahamakar,
Can you please help me.
Regards
Vivek

Delivery cost (freight) for finished goods

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for