Delivery costs not reversed in GR reversal

Hi,
I have a situation where in PO following conditions are used-
ZR0 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type
ZR2 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - Delivery cost - (100% of ZR0)
ZR3 - (-100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - (-100% of ZR0)
When I post the GR, the following entries are posted-
148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   30,421.60 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68- AUD
629935    Std-Actual Price Var   34,570.08 AUD
611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68 AUD
611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68- AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR0)
120240    CARecv Sundry-Extern   14,504.64 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64 AUD (ZR2)
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR3)
But when I reverse the GR, the following entries only are posted-
99 148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   32,653.56- AUD
86 311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68 AUD
96 629935    Std-Actual Price Var   32,338.12- AUD
50 611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68- AUD
40 611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68 AUD
Can you please let me know why the ZR0/ZR2/ZR3 cond are not reversed in the 102 movement?

Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00
002 96       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81-
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             548.57
004 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00-
005 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                               893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   USD
001 99       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00-
002 86       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             345.19
004 40       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.

Similar Messages

Negative delivery costs not allowed

Hi Experts,
In the below situation I am getting message like 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'.Please
give your suggestions.
There is a PO line item which I want to check the 'Delivery completion indicator' But when I am
going to change mode of the PO, in that line item delivery costs are coming in negative & samething
is shown in PO header condition tab as well.
So system throws message that ' PO Header still faulty'. 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'.
Please suggest how to overcome this problem.
Regards,
Partha

Hi,
PLease check which condition is causing this error and change "rounding rule" to B. If this does not solve the error, I would recommend that you open a ticket at SAP.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Delivery cost not created during GRN of PO using BAPI

I have a customized program which use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create PO, PO was created successully.
then program will use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CHANGE to update condition pricing, which is also executed succesfully. all condition pricing (KONV) updated correctly.
Lastly, the program will use BAPI - BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create GRN and update delivery cost. However in my case, the delivery cost is not update, EKBZ table record is not created, as well as GRN item line table MSEG table is not updated with delivery cost.
Anyone face this type of problem before?What is the possible causes?
Any help and suggestion is greatly appreciated.

Lai,
you should try asking this on ABAP forum thread. You will get a response. May be there is another BAPI u should use or may be you the usage of BAPI is incomplete. Pl confirm with ABAP forum.
Rgds

UNPLANNED DELIVERY COST NOT PROPERLY DISTRIBUTED TO MATERIAL LINE ITEM

Hi ,
Presently my system is Configured to distribute Unplanned Delivery Costs among invoice items,but it is not properly distributed among line item while doing the posting.
What may be the problem,Is there any additional settings to be checked ?or in which areas i need to check? Plz Help regarding this.
Thanks,
Raju

Hi,
Plz chek the SPRO settings for unplanned delivery cost. You need to maintain the company code
in SPRO - Material Management - Logistics Invoice Verification -Incoming invoices - Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
regards

GR based IV for delivery costs not working

Hi Gurus,
GR based IV is not working for certain delivery costs. I have not assigned any accrual key to the condition type in the calculation schema.
When I try to perform invoice verification for the delivery cost, the GR quantity / value does not appear automatically.
Is there anything I need to do with the schema / condition type?
Regards,
Aroop

Hi Kumar,
I had missed out the Vendor in GR option 2 in the condition type configuration: I changed it to 2, but the problem remains.
During PO creation, the vendor gets mentioned against the condition type automatically.
Any further idea on this?
Regards,
Aroop

Planned delivery cost not updating Through Invoic02 idoc

Hi,
We are using Inbound IDOC (INVOIC02) to create invoice. The enhancement that we are looking to do is to use the indicator Goods/Service items + planned delivery costs which is seen when we manually post invoices using MIRO. Can you please let us know of any inputs in this regard.
For your information - the current functional module we are using to post invoices received through EDI is IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM and the message type is INVOIC. But this does not seem to help us in case of goods which has got a planned freight attached to it.
Thanks
Shasi

Hi Experts ,
Kaindly provide me your inputs ..
Thanks
Shasi

Delivery Cost not to be inventorised

Dear all,
I need your advise in our business scenario.
Basic Price = 100.00
Customs duty = 10.00
I dont want to inventorise the customs duty to the material cost but required as a separate entry like below:
Inventory account Dr. 100.00
Customs duty Dr. 10.00
GR/IR clearing a/c Cr. 110.00
Because the imported materials are exported within 180 days. Initially we pay the customs as deposit not as a duty. If we are unable to export within 180 days then the deposit amount should get transferred to Customs duty account and to be inventorised to the material account.
Please advise.
Regards,
S.Suresh

Hi Suresh,
For this you define respecive custom duty condition type as accrual in customizing and condition type as delivery cost then after in pricing procedure mentin your defined account keys against custom duty condition type.
Hope it will solve your problem
Regards
VS

Delivery costs not reversed (MIGO - 102)

Dear all,
I need to cancel a material document (101) of which the freight costs correctly posted (101), with 2 different condition types and a different vendor for each of them.
Now with MIGO (102), I am able to reverse the freight costs for the first condition type, but not the second one. Both condition types have a very similar setup in the customizing and I do not understand why one of the freight amounts does not get reversed in MIGO (neither in MBST) whereas it was correctly posted with 101.
Any ideas?
Annabelle R.

Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00
002 96       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81-
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             548.57
004 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00-
005 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                               893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   USD
001 99       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00-
002 86       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             345.19
004 40       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.

Delivery cost reversal problem..

Hi all ,
While cancelling the custom miro system gives an error 'Balance is not equal to Zero
The user have cancelled the GRNs but while cancelling the GRN the delivery cost also has to get reversed ideally. But Delivery cost did n't get reversed fully
How we can reverse entire Delivery cost.
Thanks in advance

While cancelling the custom miro system gives an error
'Balance is not equal to Zero
Cancel invoice document with posting date of original invoice posting date
or
Click simulate in invoice document,try to find out imbalance between debit,credit,
Check g/l accounts(Debit,Credit) were set up correctly in
OBYC for transaction keys assigned to import condition types ?
or
Check tolerance keys for small difference is set up correctly ?
or
It may be application error,search for notes with error message no. & apply it.
How we can reverse entire Delivery cost.
How do you configured delivery cost to be captured ?

Negative delivery costs when releagins PO

Hi all,
When I am releasing a PO in t.code ME29N, I am getting the error 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'. First of all, why did the system apportion a negative delivery cost to one line item in my PO?
Second, how do I correct this error and go proceed normally?
Note my PO has several line items. And the delivery cost has been entered as a golbal amount. It is the system which does the apportionment.
Thanks for ur help.
Nas

Hi,
PLease check which condition is causing this error and change "rounding rule" to B. If this does not solve the error, I would recommend that you open a ticket at SAP.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Delivery Cost

Dear All,
Can negative delivery cost be maintained in the pricing procedure for Purchase order?
Regards,
Indranil

check this links
Delivery Costs
Re: Negative delivery costs not allowed
Negative delivery costs not allowed

Delivery cost input in MIRO

Hi Experts:
As some countries rules the delivery cost invoice must input before the Goods invoice(GR done) this SAP, if the the GR are not done to input the delivery cost in MIRO is very time consuming, is there any way we can mass input the delivery cost not one bye one the qty and cost?

Hi,
Go for Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS). ERS is used for invoice plan, through the use of Invoicing Plan for leasing agreements and such like (building rent, cultivation & farming etc), where aims to considerably reduce the manual data entry effort in the purchasing and invoice verification (A/P) department.
Regards,
Biju K

Negative delivery cost

when i make a deletion for line item in a PO it gives me message
"Negative delivery costs not allowed"
please advice

Check if you have any net discount at header level, so the new total of the PO is negative, and delivery cost resulting from a formula is being calculate as negative.

"Reverse" planned delivery costs stated in PO

Hi,
In PO, we planned this delivery costs. During Post Goods Receipt, the amount of this delivery costs is debited into stock. So the accounting entries during PGR is Debit Stock, Credit GR/IR
But later, we discover that this is wrong- there will not be any logistic invoice for this and there will not be such costs. How can we reverse such an entry and close the outstanding PO due to this line? So I want to Credit Stock, Debit GR/IR. If there is no stock, it should be posted to Cost of Goods Sold.
Your help is much appreciated.
Thank you.

Hi,
Please check transaction-MR11 ,it will post the differences of GR/IR as per your requirement.
Thanks & regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

Hi Xperts
We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
Regards
Soumick

Hi,
Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
Option-1:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
OR
Option-2:
Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
OR
Option-3:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
Based the above one setting, system will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
NOTE:
Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
Regards,
Biju K

Delivery costs not reversed in GR reversal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for