Delivery costs on Goods Receipt

I have a client requirement for delivery costs on a Goods Receipt. They use large on-going PO's and do partial GR's on them for years. The PO's are based on outline agreements and the pricing (including the delivery cost) comes from the outline agreement.
They want to have a flat rate delivery cost on every GR done on that PO. I have configured a new condition type (ZRB1), copied from FRB1 and have played around with many of the settings. No matter what I do, it still wants to prorate the delivery.
A developer looked at the Goods Receipt transactions and there does not appear to be any user exists where we can override the delivery cost calculation.
We also looked at setting up an alternate calculation type in the calculation schema for that condition type, but that does not appear to be triggered when the GR is done.
Has anyone had a similar requirement and successfully implemented a solution?

Hi,
What is the objective for such inclusion of freight in GR.
Whether material is valuated at standard cost or MAV. If moving avg. price then u can add the frieght cost while doing MIRO also per deliver note.
Regards
Prabhat

Similar Messages

Final Delivery indicator in Goods Receipt tab in Process Order

Hello Friends,
I have one doubt, thought to discuss with you.Whats the importance of Final delivery indicator in Process order.I know that if any further goods receipt is not accepted against the order than we should tick this indicator,because of which system sets the DLV status at order header level or if goods receipt qty against the order is equal to order qty than system automatically sets this indicator.
when we do the settlement of order than system looks either for TECO or DLV status of order , if its find there than system consider such orders for settlement.
Now my question is suppose i have done the Goods Receipt against the order less than the order qty, than system will set the PDLV Status against that order.Now no further goods receipt is expected against that order.Now i haven't set the Final delivery indicator in goods receipt tab in process order.But i have technically completed the order,because of which system has set the TECO status against that order.
Will system allow me to settle such order?and viceversa, if order has DLV status at header level and no TECO status, than system will allow to settle such order?If yes than whats the other use of Final Delivery indicator in process order?Is it important to set that indicator from settlement point of view only?
As far as i know, system allows us to do,but on this issue i have got different answers from different person.So bit confused.
Thanks and Regards,
Jitendra Chauhan
Edited by: jitendra chauhan on May 8, 2009 8:42 AM

Dear,
Will system allow me to settle such order?and viceversa, if order has DLV status at header level and no TECO status, than system will allow to settle such order?
Yes
If yes than whats the other use of Final Delivery indicator in process order?Is it important to set that indicator from settlement point of view only?
You need to Final confirm (CNF) the Order to get the DLV Status.
Or if the Delivery completed indicator is set in the Process Order, then also th System status will be DLV
If your order quantity10 and you produced 10 quantity it means that order is fully deliver then Final delivery will automatically be set.
The "delivery completed" indicator has the following effects:
o The item is regarded as closed, even if the total quantity was not delivered.
o A further delivery is not expected, may, however, arrive.
If status is DLV then it cannot be a WIP stage where the the good are posted to stock and production is completed
Please refer this thread fro DLV and TECO,
Re: order settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Allocate Landed Cost to Goods Receipt before Item is sold

Hi
Our Client would like to have a prompting to remind User to allocated Landed Cost before selling the Item as Users always make mistake and sold items before allocating landed cost to Goods Receipt resulting wrong posting of accounting entries to variance accounts.
Kedalene Chong

Hi,
we are discussing this topic also here in Austria, as a customer usually ships the goods the same day when having received, and the AP Invoice is posted some days later.
Our suggestion is a batch job that is used for period closing, which checks all shipments that were made before having posted the regarding AP Invoice, to bring a control report that sums the entries according to Item "Set G/L Accounts by" and the setup of freight costs for distribution method, so that this amounts can be balanced manually (or even better automatically) within G/L from variances to the according COGS accounts.
Basically we need the distinction between preliminary costs (goods are shipped without having posted AP Invoice) and final costs (AP Invoice is posted).
For the moment only manual journal entries from G/L account variances to COGS is possible.
Regards
Martin Fürst

Freight Cost while Goods Receipt in STO

Dear Experts,
In SAP standard STO process, freight cost calculated while Material issued against STO ( 351/641 movement).
Is there any way possible to calculate the freight at the time of goods receipt instead of at the time of Goods Issue..
Thanks in Advance.

Why do you want it at the time of GR?
Anyways, you can not see or change the freight amount in MIGO. And I don't think there is any other way to post the freight amount other than 351/641 goods issue.

Production Order Cost Analysis - Goods Receipt

I have been assigned to create analysis of production orders. I need to show the volume variance as well as the cost variance using both the initial planned costs as well as the actual costs when the production order is completed. All this information is available in COR3 on cost analysis, but I need to allow for display of multiple orders based on plant and date information.
I have found that the ingredients are in the table RESB with most of the information that I need, I have not had luck in finding what table has the goods receipt information (produced product). SAP help says that the fields are in KKBCS_OUT, which is a structure that I can't find where populated from.
I would appreciate any assistance in this endeavor.
Thanks
Steven M Engel

Thanks for the suggestions, but they have not provided me with what I think I need to give a solution to my superiors.
I will attempt to clarify what I need to do. We are a manufacturing facility. We have a BOM that says to make 10 E, I need 3 A, 2 B, 3 C, and 4 D. Each of the components (A to D) have a set cost at the time the production order is created, this looks to be saved as part of the planned cost in RESB. Produced product E also has a planned cost at time production order created (as seen by COR3) but that is not stored in RESB.
At production time we actually use 2.5 A, 2.5 B, 3 C, and 5 D to make the 10 E. COR3 cost analysis is showing me the cost variance. This cost variance has two parts, part 1 is because the quantities of the inputs are different. Part 2 is because between the time the production order was created, and the production order was finished, the costs of A to E may have changed.
I need to breakout the different components to show management how much of the total cost variance is attributed to each part. I need a report that management can run (or have run) that will allow them choose by plant, date, end product, etc. so they can direct what changes need to be made to costing, pricing, and BOMs.
I hope that I have laid out what I am trying to do in a coherent manner. Also I am new to the SAP system with less than 1 year using the system.
Thanks for your time.
Steven M Engel

Billing of Delivery only after Goods receipt is complete

Hello Experts,
I am stuck in one of the requirements and require assistance from all the experts out there.
We are currently dispatching products to our branch offices using Purchase orders. we create deliveries and then we goods issue this delivery. This delivery on receipt at branch office a goods receipt is posted. (Two step transfer).
Currently once the goods issue is done; delivery is ready for billing and is processed without verfying if the delivery is goods reciepted or not.
The requirement is that we want this delivery to be billed only after we have goods receipted in branch office. do we have any control were by we can achive this?
Looking forward for all your expert suggestions..
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Anees.

Hi,
Do not post GI. Wait till they call you. When the branch office tells you that they recieved the goods. post GI and bill.
regards,
Eric.

Delivery to Vendor / Goods Receipt from Customer

Hi all,
Our company receives samples from customers and delivers samples to vendors. However, SAP does not seem to allow deliveries to vendors nor goods receipts from customers. Can anyone advise on how to handle this situation?
Thanks,
Jane

Hi Jane,
Option 1:
Receive samples through Goods Receipt and deliver the samples through
Delivery document.
Option 2:
Create a Customer as a Vendor in different Customer code.
Book a Goods Receipt for receive a samples
Book a Delivery
*Close the thread if issue solved.
Regards
Jambulingam.P

Proof of Delivery issue VLPOD: Goods receipt.

Hi Friends,
We have implemented EHP 6 with in (ECC 6.0)
I am facing an issue where we have done Goods issue for 10 pcs. In good receipt through VLPOD we have got only 8 pcs, as 2 pieces got lost in transit. Billing and vendor invoice receipt complete after that for 8, which is OK so far.
Situation: After 2 months we have found those 2 parts in receiving side, so how do we do goods receipt for these 2 pcs as SAP is not allowing me to create VLPOD for the same delivery again. How to handle this situation. How to bring these 2 pcs in the receiving plant?
Appreciate your answers
Regards,
Raj

Hi,
May be the link will be helpful
VLPODF - how to use report for more sales organisations
Regards,
Saju.S

MM invoice verification against delivery with no Good Receipts - will it work ?

Dear all,
Let me quickly explained my issue.
We have moved to INcoterms FCA, meaning that property transfer is taken when goods are loaded at the vendor site.
No transportation module is implemented. We create an inbounds delivery when receiving info from carrier. And later on, we are receiving against it. Transport module is not implemented.
But we need to post invoice before the Goofs is physically received because of long transportation time.
My questions - I guess it is basic, I am not a MM expert - far from it -
1) Will it be possible to post the invoice against the delivery without the good being physically received.
2) Property of the goods is not yet transfered before receiving - despite the incoterm- Well, I guess so - how the financial posting will work when creating the invoice.
Many thanks for your help.
regards,
Pierre Mikael

Thank tou for your answer.
This is driven by the Incoterms. With FCA, the ownership is transfered when the carrier is loading the Goods.
But physically, it will be received in3 to 6 weeks, I cannot do a GR, it will mess up planning.
BUt the property is transferred already. This is the reason why
1. we create Inbounds Delivery (Carrier loads the goods)
2. Invoice
3. GR when physically receiving the goods.
We have no transport management implemented. -
Therefore imagine I have a PO of 10, 5 are loaded by Carrier - delivery is created - Can I have Invoice verification on 5 only ?
Regards,
Pierre MIkael

VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO

Hi all,
We have to change de Automatic PO generated in Shipment costs for Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt.
We have applied de SAP Note 427944.
. M/06
Condition type: 'B' delivery costs (T685A-KNTYP field)
Accrual: 'X' (T685A-KRUEK field)
Copy shp.costs: 'X' (T685A-BNKTK field)
. Entries in the calculation schema: (IMG -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price- Determination Process -> Define Calculation Schema)
In the calculation schema, an
1. Account key (T683S-KVSL1 field)
2. Account key - accruals/provisions (Field T683S-KVSL2)
must be specified for the corresponding condition type (similar to the FRB1 condition type in schema RM0000). Note that this condition is always marked as 'statistical' in the condition screen of the purchase order regardless of the settings in the price schema because it is an accrual.
. Purchase order: The condition type should not be valuated in the purchase order item, that is, the condition value is 0.
. Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected
shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     C transferred
. In T_56 the
u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST is D Release shipment cost item
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status are only
Calculated      C Fully calculated     but in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them the status are
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     A Not transferred   and in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
The process is :
ME21N
VL31N
VT02N (automatically)
VI01 (no PO automatically as before)
MIGO material GR for the inbound delivery of VL31N AND accounting of the delivery costs. THE ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS is missing why??
Someone can help?
Cheers
marta

Hi,
Just to clarify my questions. In the note 427944 explain that
1 . Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
*It means that the 3 status must be : Calculated C Fully calculated + Assigned C Account assignment fully completed + Transferred C transferred ?*
Other thing:
2 *. In T_56 the u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST must be D Release shipment cost item?*
3. In T_56 If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status showed in VI01 are only Calculated C Fully calculated b
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them in VI01 the status are Calculated C Fully calculated /Assigned C Account assignment fully completed / Transferred A Not transferred. *Why I can not do the transfer?*
as is Transferred A Not transferred them in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS.
Could you help me with one of these three questions?
Thank you very much,
marta

Cannot enter new delivery costs

Hi All,
I am trying to enter new delivery cost after good receipt, but system throwing error You cannot enter new delivery costs Error No. V1631. To over come this I have reverse GR document completly, but still I am not able to add new delivery cost.
Kindly help me...........

When you get the error in the PO , double click on it , the explanation is given there. It says that Adding/changing the condition type/ value would lead to possible differences In the GR IR Clearing account .
I
check note : 456691
Can I change conditions after the GR/IR has taken place? Is it still possible to carry out a new price determination process at this stage?
Answer:
You can no longer change the delivery costs after the GR has been posted.
If you have implemented Note 549408, you cannot change conditions that have the category "B" ("Delivery costs") after an invoice has been posted or parked either.
If you change data in the PO and this data usually triggers a new price determination process of the type "B" or "C", the system does not execute this automatic price determination if a GR or an IR has already been posted.
For further information, see Note 457511, question 3.

Planned Delivery Cost Settlement (MDRC)

Hi All,
I tired so many ways to settle planned delivery costs through MDRC since ERS don't settle the delivery costs. I keep getting "No values for this selection" msg. I made sure I fill in the correct information at the intial screen.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!

Hi Duke
I still unable to see MDRC tcode anywhere....
i have not understood ur query also, if u want to settle planned delivery cost it will be captured at the time of GR to freight clearing account.
The stock account is debited with the planned delivery costs at goods receipt and the system makes the offsetting posting to a freight clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry to the vendor account at invoice receipt.
Regards
Yogesh

Goods receipt against inbound delivery

After an import po has been created then an inbound delivery is created also.So after the inbound delivery we do goods receipt and our goods receipt is done against po even when their is inbound delivery.The reason why the goods receipt is done with reference to the po is that we have different vendors for all the delivery costs for example we have a vendor for custom charges, a vendor for freight charges, a vendor for terminal charges.so the goods receipt is done against the po so that when doing the miro they can select the different vendors.But inbound delivery is done with a single vendor and if the goods receipt is done against the inbound delivery it might acquire all the costs to that vendor.Is there any method whereby we can be able to do our goods receiot with reference to inbound delivery that will also capture all the delivery costs

The process you should follows is this:
1) PO - define all the custom and freight condition types and enter the corresponding vendor in the condition types. Also, in the confirmations tab, choose Inbound delivery
2) When the vendor ships the material, create an inbound delivery from VL31N to track it (against the actual import vendor)
3) When the goods reaches customs, do a MIRO against the PO choosing 2-Planned delivery costs. This will credit the Customs vendor.
4) When the goods arrive at your plant, do a MIGO against the Inbound delivery from step 2. Enter the MIRO number of step 2 in the popup that appears.
5) Now do the MIRO for the actual import vendor and the freight vendors if applicable.
Try this in your sandbox system. Doing a GR against IBD will not cause any difference in the accounting entries.

Goods receipt not possible for delivery 800015869: error code 1

Dear friends,
I am doing MIGO-GR for outbound delivery, but getting error once inputting outbound delivery no.
Goods receipt not possible for delivery 800015869: error code 1
Message no. M7865
Diagnosis
The goods receipt for the delivery cannot be posted.
The error according to the error code:
1. The delivery does not exist.
2. The delivery type is unknown.
3. The delivery is not goods issue posted.
4. There are no delivery items.
5. The receiving plant could not be determined.
6. The delivery items have already been goods receipt posted or contain zero quantities.
7. Goods receipt(effect)movement type to goods issue movement type could not be determined.
8. It is not currently possible to block the delivery.
Procedure
Error code 1      : Check your entry.
Error code 2,3,4,6: Check the delivery and its document flow.
Error code 5      : The delivery must be related to a purchase order or
                    the customer must be a retail business.
Error code 7      : Check the settins for your movement types.
Any poniters to check the setting in PO or delivery or any setting in SPRO.
Regards
Ashutosh

Hi Anupam,
That is the requirement of my scenario
That is happening in intercompany posting.
I am explaining to you.
say total stock for article AR is 1000 ( In DC --A it is 500 and in store B it is 500)
I have two company codes X and Y
One DC (A) belongs to X and second store (B) belongs to Y.
I have stock available for say article ( am working here in IS Retail instead of material ) in both DC --A and Store --B.
Now I have created PO thru replenishment planning WRP1 , now in PO supplying plant is DC.
Now I did delivery thru VL10B and then picking and then PGI.
Now my stock is reduced in DC by PO quantity created.( let us assume it is 100)
So now total stock in DC=400
Now this stock is in transit we can check thru MB5T. so total stock in transit = 100
Now I have to do GR against delivery , if I will do GR for 100 nos , there will be no stock in transit
and stock of receivibg store (B) will increase by 100 nos.
But I am not able to do GR against delivery so I did GR against PO for say 50 nos. In this case stock in store is increase by 50 nos.
But there is another stock in transit available=50
Now why GR is not happening against delivery but it is happening against PO???
Any pointers

Inbound delivery goods receipt

G'day All,
We have just implemented WMS and use both EDI and manual ASN's for Purchase Orders.
Pre WMS we would receipt the Inbound Delivery via MIGO and if the receipt amount is outside the Confirmation Control Key tolerance for KG's we would receive a message. ie "PU Ordered quantity exceeded by xxx KG".
Now we are using WMS and before we Goods Receipt, for each Inbound Delivery we also create an Inbound Transfer Order using VL06I For Putaway.
BUT now when we use VL06I (instead of MIGO) to confirm and Goods Receipt in ONE step by using For confirmatn.
For each inbound delivery we choose confirm in background and use option 2 in Adopt Putaway qty (Copy stock plcmt qty as deliv.qty into delivery and post GI).
The problem is we do NOT receive the error message we did in MIGO. The Inbound TO is confirmed but the GR fails but we dont know anything about it until we discover a negative amount in our interim GR Storage Type.
If we do it in two steps and use option 1 (Stock placement qty adopted into delivery as delivery qty) which confirms the TO first, then use For gds receipt we get the error message.
Can anyone help me with ideas on getting the message to display in VL06IC For confirmatn When we confirm the TO and GR in one step? We do not want to use the 2 step method as our Despatch department is already overworked and they will rebel and take the easy way out, leaving our inventory controllers with large headaches!
Thankyou
Luke
null

Hi
If you are carrying out a Put away against the inbound delivery first and confirming the TO the negative balance is normal as IM Does not know it has arrived yet.
Once the Put away is completed you need to go back to the inbound delivery and Post Goods receipt. This will show the stock in IM and remove the negative.
Reason
Because you are putting the stock away before you inform IM then the stock has to come from somewhere and as the movement type is 101 it creates a negative qty in 902. The post goods issue will post corresponding qty in 902 and cancel out the negative.
I hope that this helps

Delivery costs on Goods Receipt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for