Delivery date differs in the VETVG table after the BOP run.

Hi,
I have created a STO with multiple line items with multiple delivery dates in the same STO. We have APO also
E.G. 1st and 3rd line item have todays delivery date(01.03.12) and 2nd and 4th line item have 05.03.12.
for the 1st and 3rd line item the system have material availability and we get the confirmed committed quantity from the APO system and got deliverd successfully.
for the 2nd and 4th line item there is no stock in R/3 and APO sytem, and we get the committed quantity as 12/31/9999, once the material is available, BOP run happens it gives committed date in the STO delivery schedule, we found the committed date between EKET table and VETVG table is different when we try to do it for the future date, i want to understand how the committed date arrived in the VETVG table and why it is differing from the EKET table, for the 1st and 3rd line item, the committed date is same in both the table, plese advise.
Regards,
Rajesh

Hi
You can change the dates with userexits if you have specific requirements. Please, see these notes:
SAP Note 414484 - VL10: Delivery creation date all up to today (user exit)
SAP Note 198137 - VL10: Customer-specific enhancements / user exits
If you have any kind of 'accident' while you are trying solutions with records in table VETVG, see SAP Note 61148 - VL04 VL02 AME807 AME815: Insert to table VETVG.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Similar Messages

I just wanted to ignore the delivery date given by the system

hi,
sap gurus,
good afternoon to all,
i just wanted to ignore the delivery date which is given by the system.
suppose if ur creating a sales order today then system designed date for delivery is after 7 days.
i doesn't want that day.
i want the same date as delivery date in which order is created.
regards,
balaji.t
09990019711

You can ignore the Requested delivery date , beacuse during delivery scheduling system takes this date into consideration.
Yes , you can default the requested delivery date by changing in the Sales doc type (VOV8) as per your requirement in 'Lead time in dats field", also you can change this default date as requested by the customer, during order processing .
If you make the "Lead time in days" field blank, then system will automatically propose to-day's date as the Requested Delivery date.
Whichever date you may put, system takes it into consideration in delivery scheduling.Requested delivery date means , customer wants to receive the goods on this date. System checks by delivery scheduling, whether this date can be confirmed or not.
First, it starts Backward Scheduling, means starts calculating backward from this Requested Delivery date and calculates the "Material Availabilty date"& the "Transportation Planning date".
If both these date ("Material Availabilty date" & "Transportation Planning date) are after the order date and the Material is available on the Material availability date then , the Requested delivery date can be confirmed.
Even one of the date is earlier than the order date or the material is not available on the Material Availability date then system can not confirm the Customer's Requested delivery date & immediately it goes for forward scheduling. Accordingly you get the delivery date/ dates in the schedule line for the item.
So how system can ignore this date ?
Actually this date is tested whether it can be confirmed or not
& whether Forward scheduling will take place or not.
I hope it is clear.

Requested delivery date determined by the customers

Experts,
Several customers have theirs own rules for determining requested delivery date. These rules are based on Sales order date.
I mean if the SO is received from monday to wednesday, the requested delivery date should be the next monday.
How can I set up these rules or do I need to consider pures Abap codes...
Thanks !
Victor

Hi Victor,
Using an ABAPER's help could be an option out.
The other option out would to define different sales documents for each of your days e.g. Sales Document ZMON for monday, ZTUE for tuesday and it the sales document type settings you can keep the lead time as 7 days for ZMON, 6 days for ZTUE so on.
Now if the user creates the sales order with ZMON he will get the delivery date on a monday provided ofcourse he creates the sales order using ZMON on a monday and ZTUE on a Tuesday.
Hope this helps.
J Nagesh

First delivery date change at the time of PGI

Dear Expert,
i have one query , i have fixed in house production time=1 days, planned delivery time10 days in MRP-2 views .Suppose i create one sales order on current date the first delivery date will pick the date ,(current date10 days). but user wants to change the first delivery date at the time of PGI as per their need, as it may be before or after the required delivery date.
HOW TO CHANGE THE DATE.
give your valuable solution regarding this.
KInd regards
vimlendu kaushik

dear expert
system is not allowing to change the required delivery date as sujjested by you. i have one fg material say 'X' its planned delivery time is 10 days, availibilty check -02.while creating sales order for the above fg material system will pick (current date +planned delivery time), say current date 20.10.2010 & pdt-10 days, syatem will pick 30.20.2010.
but after go to va02 it is not allowing to change the delivery date, but it can happen at any time as business needs this.
kindly resolve this issue with proper logic.
kind regards
vimlendu kaushik

Delivery date determination in the schedule lines

Hi,
       I have a question on the delivery date determination in the schedule lines of the sales order. If the goods issue date in the schedule line has been determined as 17th Aug 2009, and the transit time is 3 days. What should be the delivery date that will be proposed? Should it be 10 + 3 equal 20th Aug 2009, or it will be 21st Aug, which is the the following day of 10 + 3 ? I simulated in the sales order and it gave me 21st, my understanding was it should be just 17 + 3 = 20th Aug.
hope anyone can shed some light on the above. TQ
krt

Hi ,
This is what F1 help says
Rounding-up period for delivery scheduling (in days)
    The amount of time that the system automatically adds as a safety margin
    to the estimated time required for processing a delivery.
Use
    The system adds the rounding-up margin to the time estimates for a
    delivery, regardless of whether the system
    o   Calculates the times from data in the master records, or
    o   Simply uses the default times that apply to the relevant shipping
        point.
This is F1 Help of rounding days and not my words..... you can also check in OVXD t-code.
Thanks,
Raja

GR/Delivery Date required in the Invoice Verification screenlayout

Dear Forum,
We notice that when the users perform the Invoice Verification thru MIRO, in the screenlayout corresponding to 'All Information' the system populates the date under the 'Delivery Date' column, however, this date corresponds to the Delivery Date mentioned in the PO Header and does not reflect the actual GR Date. The users want this to be replaced by the actual Delivery Date when the goods were received and GR was posted. Is there a way to replace this or else modify the layout so that the actual Delivery Date is populated. The reason is that the users want the baseline date to be replaced by the actual GR date and do want to go for another step involving the scrutinizing of the PO History.
Thanks for the help!
Regards

Hi Venkat,
Thanks for the help, is there a way to change the layout of the MIRO screen such that we can view the actual GR or the Delivery Date while doing MIRO.
Regards

GR Block if material received before the delivery date given in the P.O

Hi,
I want to know is there any setting if we receievd the material from the vendor before the delivery date given in the P.O, SAP should give the error messaage or warning message while making the GR of that material.
regards,
zafar

In OMCQ , make message 00 M7 254 "Earliest possible delivery date is& " as warning/ Error

The Data Received from the server running AD RMS didn't match the expected format.contact your system administrator for further investigation.

Hi All,
We Have implemented AD RMS in our organisation recently.But the Problem we are facing here many users those are Ms office 2013 we will get the error"The Data Received from the server running AD RMS didn't match the expected format.contact
your system administrator for further investigation." and those who are in Ms office 2010 Professional it says
"The service is Temporally unavailable.Ensure the you have connectivity to this server.This error could be caused if you are working offline.Proxy setting are preventing your connection or intermittent network issue."
Below are the workaround did,
1.Able to reach to Our pipeline ADRMS cluster.
2.We have a valid Certificate.
3.if we type https://adrms.ourdomain.com its working fine.
4.Manually put the registry setting for effected computers.
5. Applied the Hotfixes:MicrosoftFixit50903,KB2627273.
Kindly help or suggest us to resolve the above issue as many computers in domain are not working with IRM.
Thanks and reqard,
Mohammed Siddiq.

Hi Mohammed,
Were you able to fix the issue with CRL disablement?
Did my post help you or make you laugh? Don't forget to click the Helpful vote :) If I answered your question please mark my post as an Answer.

Checking the master data automatically before the payroll run...

Hi Friends,
Can anyone tell me that, is it possible to check the master data automatically before the payroll run.
If any user forget to maintain any important info-type ( like Cost Distribution ) in time of master data maintenance, SAP allow the Payroll system to run the payroll for that employee. Only in time of account posting the user is able to know the problem and due to rectify the problem they have to delete the payroll.
So, I therefore wants to know that is there any check point or can customized any such things, which will check the necessary info-types before running payroll and generate an error massage about the missing info-type and also skip the processing for that person.
With regards,
Diptendu

have
a look at this report
but before that make sure wht are the mandatory infotypes that are maintained to the employee so that u can come to an idea what are infotypes that are maintained for the memployee
se 38 HTWLINFO read the documentation of the is report mmight be useful

After Bop run the delivery dates differs in STO tables.

Hi,
I have created a STO with multiple line items with multiple delivery dates in the same STO. We have APO also
E.G. 1st and 3rd line item have todays delivery date(01.03.12) and 2nd and 4th line item have 05.03.12.
for the 1st and 3rd line item the system have material availability and we get the confirmed committed quantity from the APO system and got deliverd successfully.
for the 2nd and 4th line item there is no stock in R/3 and APO sytem, and we get the committed quantity as 12/31/9999, once the material is available, BOP run happens it gives committed date in the STO delivery schedule, we found the committed date between EKET table and VETVG table is different when we try to do it for the future date, i want to understand how the committed date arrived in the VETVG table and why it is differing from the EKET table, for the 1st and 3rd line item, the committed date is same in both the table, plese advise.
Regards,
Rajesh

Hi
You can change the dates with userexits if you have specific requirements. Please, see these notes:
SAP Note 414484 - VL10: Delivery creation date all up to today (user exit)
SAP Note 198137 - VL10: Customer-specific enhancements / user exits
If you have any kind of 'accident' while you are trying solutions with records in table VETVG, see SAP Note 61148 - VL04 VL02 AME807 AME815: Insert to table VETVG.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Provide brings back the actual date , different to the table content

Hi,
I´m not a developer, but must do that part now in my company.
We have a 46C with actual packages.
In a customer report I have to add 2 fields to an output.
It selects from PNP and provides data like follows:
GET PERNR.
PROVIDE * FROM P0000
FROM P0001
FROM P0002
FROM P0006
FROM P0007
FROM P0013
FROM P0016
FROM P0053
    BETWEEN PN-BEGDA
        AND PN-ENDDA.
That worked fine.
Now I liked to set 2 fields with contents of IT 0000 (table PA0000):
    IF P0000-MASSG = '01'.            " MA aktuell im Vorruhestand ?
     TRANS-BEGVORRST = P0000-BEGDA.
     TRANS-ENDVORRST = P0000-ENDDA.
    ENDIF.
At debugging I can see, that the requested fields from P0000 are set to the actual date, not to the value I can select from table or shown in the SAP transaction.
All other fields from PA0000 are matching the row I expect, but not the date fields
Any idea?

Hi,
That is the behavior of PROVIDE statement. If you combine (JOIN) several tables (P0001, P0002, etc) together, it will give you all the intersected dates.
For example, in two tables itab1 and itab2, the respective columns col1 and col2 are interval limits of type i. The filling of the internal tables results in the following intervals (rows two and three):
|   Itab1 Int1    |     |Itab1 Int2 |     |
|        |      Itab2 Int1       |        |
| |          ... BETWEEN ...             |
| | i1 |   i2   | i3 |   i4   |i5|     | <<<< This is the result
Regards,
Lim...
Edited by: Ruslim Chang on Apr 17, 2009 11:26 AM

Display only data different from the previous row

Hello,
I will use a simple example to explain what I would like to do with a query.
I have a table 'test' with 4 columns (col1, col2, col3, col4).
The table 'test' contains the following data:
A B C D
A E C D
A F G D
K F G HI would like to create a query ordered on the first column with the following result:
A B C D
   E
   F G
K        HOnly data that are different from the previous row have to be displayed.
Do you have ideas on how to do this.
Thanks for your help

SQL> l
1 select
2 decode(a,lag(a) over (order by a),null,a) a,
3 decode(b,lag(b) over (order by a),null,b) b,
4 decode(c,lag(c) over (order by a),null,c) c,
5 decode(d,lag(d) over (order by a),null,d) d
6 from
7 (
8 select 'A' a,'B' b,'C' c , 'D' d from dual
9 union
10 select 'A' a,'E' b,'C' c , 'D' d from dual
11 union
12 select 'A' a,'F' b,'G' c , 'D' d from dual
13 union
14 select 'K' a,'F' b,'G' c , 'H' d from dual
15* )
SQL> /
A B C D
A B C D
E
F G
K     H

Statistical-relevent delivery date not showing up in PO after upgrad to ECC

Hi Gurus,
After upgrade to ECC, Statistical-relevant delivery date (PO Item details --> delivery schedule tab) is not showing up when I convert PR to PO from Stock requirements list(MDO7).
Could you please help me out this issue.

Maintain the item category in your material master at sales organisation level and try again.
Also Please Check the delivery item category determination in trxn code 0184 there you define which item category is to be found for the combination of delivery type NL and item category group.
Regards,
Ashok
Edited by: Ashok Kumar Telikula on Aug 27, 2008 2:35 PM

Delivery date issue in the ASn inbound process via IDOC

HI
we want to start with ASN and we ´re already receiving IDOC´s
DESADV Delvry03
we are using Fm /SPE/IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 and we have tried IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 but teh reesult was the same.
The segment E1EDT13 Qualifier 007/009/006 exist and we are able to create a inbound delivery. The problem we have is that we are not able to calculate the delivery date in the inbound delivery.
The idea was that the vendors sends us the GI date (Qualifier 007) and our SAP calculates based on the plannend delivery time in the SA/PO the expected GR date 8what we see in MD04). But at the moment we only the creation date as delivery date.
what do we miss?
thanks for the help
regards
Alex

Hi,
Firstly, for DESADV processing delivery date field (LFDAT) is taken from qualifier '007' while goods issue is from '006'.
As far as I understood you would like to get delivery date based on data from given delivery schedules. But note that inbound delivery items are not related specifically to delivery schedules. Instead, those are referenced to purchasing document items only. Therefore it is not exactly specified what delivery date should be selected for which inbound delivery.
Alternative could be to perform scheduling for inbound deliveries based on route transit times etc.But in standard inbound delivery types are not available for SD scheduling and thus it is not directly available.
If you need to get such functionality, you would need to use one of the DESADV processing u-exits available and include your own logic for lfdat calculations.
Regards,
Dominik Modrzejewski

Why is the INVOICE date different than the ORDER date?

Something odd is happening... I'm receiving workflow notifications from Business Catalyst for Invoices, but sometimes the date of the order is the day before I receive the invoice. This is causing havoc on the shipping side because when I print out the invoice packing slips and export the order files, they don't match up and sometimes customers get missed.
Any idea why the invoice date would be different than the order date and how do I fix it to make them the same?
Thanks in advance!

Hey there,
An invoice is not an order. That is an important thing to know.
An order is generated through a few means but mainly as soon as one product is added to a cart - that order exists and the date marked. An invoice is a purchase and comes from an order.
Create an order in the admin yourself and save it but add no invoice number. You can see you just made an order and you will see the button to generate invoice.
API can make an order and no invoice, a person can add items to cart and finish it the next day if they have their session open that long... Lots of reasons why these dates may differ.

Delivery date differs in the VETVG table after the BOP run.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for