Delivery date in inbound delivery

Hi
WE have the following scenario
WE create a inter-company STO.  Outbound delivery is created against STO and then we do PGI.
Suppose planned delivery dt of OBD is 10-jan-2011 and actual PGI is done on 18-jan-2011.
After PGI we create inbuound delivery in receiving plant.  In inbound delivery, we are getting delivery date as planned delivery date of outbound delivery i.e. 10-jan-2011.  But we want actual PGI date i.e. 18-jan-2011 in delivery date of inbound delivery.
is it possible?  Please suggest how can we do this?

Hi,
I think the issue is not related to inbound delivery. Because you probably would not only have delivery date at inbound delivery equal to PGI date. Instead it should be PGI+transit time. Hence, I believe what you should focus is to get planned delivery date corrected at your outbound delivery during PGI.
I do not think standard config supports rescheduling of planned dates at delivery during PGI (even if you setup rescheduling type 'A' at your delivery type). But you can always call SD_SCHEDULING FMs to get new delivery dates and get those posted from outbound to inbound deliveries.
Regards,
Dominik Modrzejewski

Similar Messages

  • Delivery Date in inbound delivery doc not accurate

    Dear all,
    I have a question with regards to the wrong delivery date appear in our inbound delivery.
    Our inbound delivery is created via a message output in the outbound delivery of a standard SAP cross company stock transport order. The delivery date in the inbound delivery is not correct from a business point of view.
    +The correct delivery date in the inbound delivery document should be [the Actual GI date field in the outbound delivery] + [transport time (i.e. route field) in the outbound delivery].+
    Either way (i.e. the Actual GI date field is later/earlier than the planned GI in the outbound delivery), the delivery date in the inbound delivery is also wrong.
    Do you have any idea? We have tried to change the inbound delivery type EL by setting a flag (i.e. X) in the rescheduling (TVLK-NEUTE), and it still doesnu2019t work.
    Please help.
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    implements SAP Note 1316614

  • Delivery Date in Inbound delivery document not correct

    Dear all,
    I have a question with regards to the wrong delivery date appear in our inbound delivery.
    Our inbound delivery is created via EDI output in the outbound delivery of a standard SAP cross company stock transport order. The delivery date in the inbound delivery is not correct from a business point of view.
    +The correct delivery date in the inbound delivery document should be [the Actual GI date field in the outbound delivery] + [transport time (i.e. route field) in the outbound delivery].+
    Either way (i.e. the Actual GI date field is later/earlier than the planned GI in the outbound delivery), the delivery date in the inbound delivery is also wrong.
    Do you have any idea?  We have tried to change the inbound delivery type EL by setting a flag (i.e. X) in the rescheduling (TVLK-NEUTE), and it still doesnu2019t work.
    Please help.
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    Does anyone know this problem?
    appreciate some feedback.

  • PO delivery date vs Inbound delivery date

    Hi,
    I'm using message number M7-254 and set it as Error message. When I do GR w/ ref to inbound delivery the message M7-254 still considers/reads the PO del date instead of inbound del date during GR. Can it be modified to read the del date from inbound when there's inbound del created for the PO?
    Or if not, can you advise another system message that would best suit our customer's requirement where system blocks GR if posting date not equal inbound delivery date?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Marianne,
    A quick thought:
    Use the BADI - ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST & the method - PROCESS_SCHEDULE to copy the delivery date as per your inbound document to the field - Latest GR Date in Delivery tab of the Item details section.
    Then in OMCQ flag the message M7 163 message as E. This would ensure that the system will not allow GR to be done after this date.
    Hope the above helps.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • PO Confirmation Date (OA) & Inbound Delivery Date  Report

    Dear All,
    Please let me know SAP Standard Report
    PO Confirmation Date (OA) & Inbound Delivery Date  Report
    Regards
    Amey

    Hi,
    I guess ME2A will give u unconfirmed orders that require a confirmation, but have not yet been confirmed according to the dates configured for your monitoring period. First, ensure that you have such an order
    Also, ensure that your confirmation control (OMGZ) has BOTH a value in Monitoring period AND Reference date.
    Pls chk note for more information.    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/500502
    BR,
    Krishna

  • Purchase Order Delivery Date Vs. Actual delivery date

    I am trying to run a query with PO # and date with Delivery date against MIGO Delivery date.
    I am missing something here. When I join the tables EKPO,EKKO, EKBE. The results are getting duplicated.
    Could anyone help me ? In the selection field I choose Plant and PO Date.
    Regards,
    Sudha

    hi,
    In PO, planned delivery time mostly comes from the vendor master record which you can check here:
    LFM1 - PLIFZ...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Planned Delivery Date and Actual Delivery date.

    Hi,
    Is there a report in SAP which shows the delivery date of a PO line item and actual GR posting date from PO history in one report?
    I need to display the planned delivery date and actual delivery date in one report, preferably in columns next to each other.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    To my knowledge there is no such report. You will have to develop this report through ABAP help. You need to pick the planned delivery date from the PO and GR posting date from material document. Both this fields (EEIND & BUDAT) can be viewed in the PO history.
    However, challenge will be when you have multiple delivery dates and receipt posting dates are for part quantities.
    Regards,
    Jagadeesh

  • Making delivery date catagory in delivery schedule as week in Sch. agreemen

    Dear MM gurus,
    I am creating automatic delivery schedules in scheduling agreement via MRP run and i am using standard weekly lot sizing procedure. Delivery schedule so created  have 'D' as delivery date category. My requirement is to create schedule via MRP with delivery date category as 'W'. Kindly tell me where can i default delivery date category in delivery schedule lines to week (W). Please post of more information if required. I will be quick to respond.
    Thanks
    Avinash

    Hi,
    If the Lot Size is set to 'W', it instructs the MRP to group all the requirements in a week, considering it as single lot and create
    procurement element to cover these requirements. It has no influence on the delivery date category in the schedule line or date category in any procurement element.
    When the Schedule lines are generated by the MRP run, the default date category is always D (date format). There is no settings/customizing available to alter this behavior.
    Kind Regards,
    Suneet

  • Different delivery type for inbound delivery

    Hi,
    Somebody knows if it is possible to assign diferent delivery types for inbound delivery from differents document type of PO?
    for example, delivery type EL for "NB" PO and delivery type "ZEL" for UB (Stock Transp. Order). 
    thanks
    RZ

    Dear,
    Check: Different inbound delivery types from PO conf control keys
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Combine stock transfer orders with different delivery dates into 1 delivery

    Hello,
    In transaction VL10B, the system normally combines stock transfer orders that have the same ship-to-party and same delivery date (if the combination indicator in the customer master specific to sales and distribution is checked). My business requirement is to combine stock transfer orders that have the same ship-to-party but different delivery dates. Is this possible through standard configuration? Is there a user exit that can allow this?
    At the moment the system is creating different outbound deliveries according to the delivery dates specified in the stock transfer orders.
    Please advice a solution.
    Regards,
    Felipe

    Felipe, please have a look at OSS note 386340, it may help to solve your problem about combining STO items with different delivery dates to one delivery (as I understand the code correction overwrites the delivery dates...).
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 21, 2011 5:06 PM

  • Production date in inbound delivery in batch split

    Hi,
         I have a issue with production date update in inbound delivery.
    I have created a inbound delivery for 10 PC. The inbound delivery has only one line item and there are no batch details on it. As soon as the inbound delivery is created a message is sent to the 3PL . Once the 3PL receives the goods from vendor he send us a message with the batch details. Say the 3PL has received multiple batches from the vendor. So he send us back an SHPCON message with multiple batch details. That  is batch A with QTY 6 and batch B with QTY 4. He also send us the production date for each batch via the shpcon idoc. say batch A has production date as 10.02.2011 and batch B has production date as 21.03.2011.
    The IDOC is created successfully in our system and the inbound delivery is also updated correctly with the batch split details with correct QTY. That is line item 10 has batch split line items 900001 with batch as A and QTY as 6 and line item 900002 with batch as B and QTY as 4. The issue is only with updation of date of production for each of the above batch. Both batch A & B are updated with date of production as 21.03.2011. Instead of batch A being updated with date of production as 10.02.2011 it is updated with the batch B date of production. I checked in the idoc. In the idoc each batch has correct production date. only when updating the inbound delivery it has updated wrongly..   Has any one come across similar kind of situation. ? How did u manage it?
    Ram

    I found out the issue and the approriate changes has been made in the message handling

  • Actual GR Date in Inbound Delivery takes current Date

    Hello Everybody,
    The Output SPED gets issued after PGI from the Outbound in an Intercompany, it generates an Inbound automatically.
    Problem: On the Inbound the field "Actual GR Date" gets populated with the same date as when PGI occurs. The PGI occurs in the US Plant while the PGR is supposed to occur in Europe. The Route Transit Time is 30 days.
    Example: If the PGI Date is today, 18th May the system populates the Inbound Delivery field "Actual GR Date" as 18th May.
    Research into Causes:
    It appears the system is not adding the Route Transit Time. We used the "New Route Determination Time" the the value "A" for the Inbound as well as the Outbound and we do not maintain entries in Table TROAL. Yet, the Inbound still populates with the PGI Date from the Outbound.
    Business Impact:
    The ATP in Europe considers Stock In-Transit for real-time updates. So, this Inbound gets considered for ATP in Europe starting from today's date, 18th May 2011; so Europe will start promising their customers that these goods will be available from today; however, in reality the products will be available in Europe only after 30 days. This is the impact of the field "Actual GR Date" on the Inbound Delivery.
    Thanks,
    SR

    Check the SPED functional module how the atcual date is passing.Check with technical team if they can insert alogic the actual date should be after PGI date +30 days as the delay required to reach the material.If you are not able to insert the logic then stop passing the actual GR date in GR.I think it is possible.

  • GurtVLO6if will not show PGR Date in inbound delivery

    hi gurus,
           Pls provide me the flow on how to link the inbound delivery number with the material document number, as I need to get the material doc number based on that delivery number and then I need to get the receipt date i.e. document date or posting date  from the material document master tables and fill in the enhanced structure field that I added for the goods receipt date in standard structure,, for this purpose and  at last inside the user exit to fill values for report vl06if.
    Regards
    NNeeti

    hi nneti,
               put thevariant parameter and check with material master

  • VLO6if will not show PGR Date in inbound delivery

    hi Gurus,
                VL06IF will not show the Post good receipt date of an inbound delivery,
    need this date inserted in the report.last column good recepit does not show any dates
    showing last column empty
    please check
    thanks,
    Joan

    Hi,
    Check Note 128150 - VL06: Designing your own display variants. It explains how to do with enhancement V50Q0001.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards,
    Eduardo

  • Update Delivery Qty of  Inbound Delivery using BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CHANGE

    Hi Experts,
    I'm trying to use  BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CHANGE to update the delivery quantity of a line item in an Inbound Delivery. However, I keep on getting this error:
    Type: E
    ID: VLBAPI
    Number: 004
    Text: Error in document &1 item &2 (quantity consistency check)
    Below is my test program. Any input will be much appreciated.
    REPORT  ztest.
    DATA: deadlines LIKE bapidlvdeadln OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_deadlines LIKE bapidlvdeadln.
    DATA: header_data_t LIKE bapiibdlvhdrchg OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_header_data LIKE bapiibdlvhdrchg.
    DATA: header_control_t LIKE bapiibdlvhdrctrlchg OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_header_control LIKE bapiibdlvhdrctrlchg.
    DATA: item_data LIKE bapiibdlvitemchg OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_item_data LIKE bapiibdlvitemchg.
    DATA: item_control LIKE bapiibdlvitemctrlchg OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_item_control LIKE bapiibdlvitemctrlchg.
    DATA: header_data_t_con LIKE bapiibdlvhdrcon OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_header_data_con LIKE bapiibdlvhdrcon.
    DATA: header_control_t_con LIKE bapiibdlvhdrctrlcon OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_header_control_con LIKE bapiibdlvhdrctrlcon.
    DATA: item_data_con LIKE bapiibdlvitemcon OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_item_data_con LIKE bapiibdlvitemcon.
    DATA: item_control_con LIKE bapiibdlvitemctrlcon OCCURS 0.
    DATA: wa_item_control_con LIKE bapiibdlvitemctrlcon.
    DATA: return TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapiret2.
    CLEAR: wa_header_data, wa_header_control.
    wa_header_data-deliv_numb = '0180000545'.
    wa_header_data-gross_wt = '3001.000'.
    *wa_header_data-NET_WEIGHT = '3001.000'.
    wa_header_data-unit_of_wt = 'KG'.
    wa_header_data-volume = '1500.5'.
    wa_header_data-volumeunit = 'M3'.
    APPEND wa_header_data TO header_data_t.
    wa_header_control-deliv_numb = '0180000545'.
    wa_header_control-NET_WT_FLG = 'X'.
    wa_header_control-volume_flg = 'X'.
    wa_header_control-gross_wt_flg = 'X'.
    *wa_HEADER_CONTROL-DELIV_DATE_FLG = 'X'.
    APPEND wa_header_control TO header_control_t.
    CLEAR: wa_item_data.
    wa_item_data-deliv_numb = '0180000545'.
    wa_item_data-deliv_item = '000020'.
    wa_item_data-dlv_qty = '3000'.
    wa_item_data-dlv_qty_imunit = '3000'.
    wa_item_data-sales_unit = 'KG'.
    wa_item_data-sales_unit_iso = 'KG'.
    wa_item_data-base_uom = 'KG'.
    wa_item_data-base_uom_iso = 'KG'.
    wa_item_data-gross_wt = '3000'.
    wa_item_data-unit_of_wt = 'KG'.
    wa_item_data-volume = '1500'.
    wa_item_data-volumeunit = 'M3'.
    APPEND wa_item_data TO item_data.
    CLEAR: wa_item_control.
    wa_item_control-deliv_numb = '0180000545'.
    wa_item_control-deliv_item = '000020'.
    wa_item_control-chg_delqty = 'X'.
    wa_item_control-VOLUME_FLG = 'X'.
    wa_item_control-NET_WT_FLG = 'X'.
    wa_item_control-GROSS_WT_FLG = 'X'.
    APPEND wa_item_control TO item_control.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CHANGE'
    EXPORTING
    header_data = wa_header_data
    header_control = wa_header_control
    delivery = '0180000545'
    * TECHN_CONTROL =
    TABLES
    * HEADER_PARTNER =
    * HEADER_PARTNER_ADDR =
    * HEADER_DEADLINES = deadlines
    item_data = item_data
    item_control = item_control
    * ITEM_SERIAL_NO =
    * EXTENSION1 =
    * EXTENSION2 =
    return = return
    * TOKENREFERENCE =
    * HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER =
    * HANDLING_UNIT_ITEM =
    * PARTIAL_GR_OBJECTS =
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.

    Hi,
    Pls try to use the other structure
    ORDER_SCHEDULES_INX type BAPISCHDLX bcoz it is used to update the required field.
    Now for the date field add the required days to set it as future date.
    ex:
    l_date = l_date + 12. // it will be set to future or requred date.
    Reward if helpful.
    Regards
    Chandralekha

Maybe you are looking for

  • J2ME client server

    Hi i have a client J2ME application written verifyed and running. I am a little new to the whole programming thing but I was wondering if anybody knew if it was possible to use JSP or a servlet to distribute an application like a quiz on my server, p

  • Invisible Sheild Rumor

    I remember reading here a while ago that if you put an invisible sheild on your ipod touch and then later decide to take it off the screen becomes unresponsive. Is this true or just a rumor? Thanks.

  • Using data values for member selection

    Hello everybody: I know there are functions to operate with members, strings, member names, ... so that you are able to convert from a string to a member (@MEMBER) and conversely. But, is there any way to use a member value to select another member?.

  • Import optimization

    Hello everyone. I am a C++ programmer who knows enough Java to be dangerous. I have been assigned to port one of our existing applications to a Java/J2ME environment to be run on a cell phone. I am trying to find out the best techniques for writing e

  • Group Key field Match Code in Vendor Master

    My client have a unique requirement to group the vendors.  We are using the Group key field in the vendor master for this purpose,  We want to create a match code which can link the vendor number to the group key field.  Anyone have any idea on how t