Delivery once billed should not allow again for billing
HI Friends,
Delivery once Billed should not allowed for billing again.
how to solve this, give the user exit if possible
Thanks & Regards
T.A.V
Hi,
Please ensure that the Copying Requirement routine 003 is assigned at the header for your billing and delivery type in transaction VTFL. Also set up 004 at the item level. I hope this will resolve the issue.
Regards,
Murali
Similar Messages
-
In schedule line before delivery date , grc should not allow
Hi MM expert,
i am using schedule line process.
now i want that i could not do Goods reciept before shedule line.
kindly help.
Regards,
santoshHi
Have you gone through entire Cycle process of Sceduleing agreement .
If you have created Schedule agreement in -ME31L
Then maitained delivery date [Schedule lines date]-in ME38
Then SAP-System will not allow you to do the GR till the date as per the Delevery schedule lines date.
After reaching that date you can do any time GR.
Try it you will get it
with regards
Shrinivas gangoor -
Once payment received for bill system should not allow to cancel
Hi Experts ,
we have created commercial invoice and posted to fi document and payment received from party.but when we try to cancel the same billing document system allowing to cancel the document.So Client requirement is once payment received from party system it should not allow to cancel the billing document.
Please give your valuable suggestions on the same ...
regards...
MMHello,
In the Tx VOFA for the billing type to be cancelled(Ex F2), please
fill the field Copying Requirements(V_TVFK-GRBED_S) with '29'.
This routine prevents the cancellation of the billing documents which
have been cleared.
Regards,
Raghavendra YN -
Nonstock material PO value should not allow to change once it picked fromPR
Hi There,
when create PO for non stock material it will pick price from PR to PO once it pick the value again it should not allow to change.
so what ever value is there in PR same should be in PO also even if we try to change PO value system should not allow
so please advise meDear
If you want to copy the price from PR to PO do the following settings
Here we have to do:
First create a parameter in
SPRO>Materials Management>Purchasing>Authorization Management>Define Function
Authorizations for Buyers
set the following fields:
Order price adoption, Ref. to PReq, Change source, Change
OTy./it. cat. and with Field sel. equals to AKTH. After created
this parameter we have to set the users profile (using SU01 Transaction) with Parameter
EFB (Function Authorization: Purchase Order).
After doing all the settings what i mentioned, when you create the requisition that time before saving you have to select the price adoption as net or gross than only it will copy to the po because default is do not copy
so go Valuation tab in the requisition and in PO price field select as nte price or Gross price than save the reqs
now if oyu create the PO you will see the price
Regards -
System should not allow to do the changes in PO once the ID created.
Hi All,
Once the Inbound Delivery is Created based on the Purchse Order, System should not allow to do the changes in the Purchase Order like Deletion of Item, etc..
Any Configuration Changes is avaliable. ?
Regards,
SudhakarDear,
Please check the staus in order
Current order status xxxx does not allow goods receipt (Message no. C6009)? is this the message?
This will not allow you to do GR for production order when you activate status profile "SAT1" in the production order. After that when you confirm order it will automatically assign next user status i.e. "SAT2" (if not assign it manually in CO02) it will allow you to do GR for that production order.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Delivery is invoiced fully so system should not allow to create 2nd invoic
hi Expert,
my issue is, once invoice is created for delivery.
system should not allow user to create
second invoice for same delivery number.
where to check the confiurtion to stop such
behaviour
waiting for your reply
thanks
AliciaHi Alicia
In the copy control from delivery to invoice - T code VTFL
you can maintain the copy routines. try maintaining routine
3-- which is delivery reatled header
4-- which is delivery related item
also at item level copy control you may add the check in billign quantites
this would stop formc reating another invocie
Hope this helps
Thanks
Akasha -
Invoice cancellation should not allow for closed periods
Dear All,
We will be closing the posting period for each quarter,and declare the sales figure.,what ever the invoices we have made should not be cancelled in that quarter.,i want the a check in the system that if any cancellation during this quarter which is closed ,should not allow to cancel the invoice.ofcourse the accounting document will not be generated as the posting period is closed but still the invoice is generated and blocked for accounting.i want the creation of billing document should be blocked.
i Know this can be achieved By defining new routine in VOFA and assign it in VTFL., but is there any standerd routine there which will solve my purpose or i hae to go for new routine.
REgards
ShakthiHello Shakthi,
In standard, there is note 180756.
Unfortunately the note 180756 just helps for billing creation, it is not useful for
billing cancellation.
The note 180756 suggests to develop a copy requirement routine checking
the periods.
But in VF11 copy requirement routine are not performed.
Unfortunately there is not a ready-to-use workaround.
In transaction VOFA is possible to define a "copy requirement" routine,
which is performed when the invoice is cancelled.
You could create a routine doing the necessary check, and put
it here.
Regards,
Alex -
System should not allow to add line items in delivery
Hi,
1) system should not allow to add line items in delivery( in reference to sales order or STO)
2) sales order/STO should not be changed if delivery exists
how to control the above
AlecHi Lakxmi,
I found answer for 1st point from you are old answers.
can you throw somelight on 2nd point.
Thanks
Anil -
Solution for Bug 13412084: RESTRICT PAYMENT: IT SHOULD NOT ALLOW PAYMENT BE
http://attiqahmed.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/solution-for-bug-13412084-restrict-payment-it-should-not-allow-payment-before-invoice-accrual/
hello sir Octavio
Im sorry.. I failed to tell you that our encoder of invoices is separate from the one who entry for payments.
Therefore, the encoder uses the invoices batches[(N) Invoices>Entry>Invoice Batches] whereas the Paymaster(the one who entered payments?) uses the Payments [Payments>Entry>Payments]
By the way your suggestion did work to disable the Pay in Full checkbox.. but i decided to get rid of the actions button for the encoder.. and another person will be handling the validation and create accounting having such access.
So what i wanted is that the paymaster wouldn't be able see among the LOV of invoices at the Payments Form if its not created accounting.
I wanna make sure that all invoices are created accounting.
thank you so much for the understanding..:-)
Emgee -
With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati
Dear all
with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
how it is possible.
Regrads
SrinivasDear ,
In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
We can change it as per req using user exit
Regards,
Ishwar -
Without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decesion
Hi
without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decision.I think it is possible through user status. Please tell the procedure .
Thanks and regards,
vairavanDear vairavan,
You can check for the authorisation object.I can't remember that authoriation object right now.But surely you can restrict that with authorisation object.
Anyone knows the authoristaion object.
Regards,
Sunil Patil -
QA32: Without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow for UD
Hi
At the time of UD "without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow to save the UD".
Please suggest how to restrict.
Regards
AshishPlease go through the below link & with small changes you can fulfill your requirement using user profile
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/601c82e3-b743-2c10-dbb6-ed4c00167157?QuickLink=index&… -
Pricing should not be changed in billing document?
HI,
We have given manual entry provision for pricing in Sales order level . But as per the company requirement, the price should not be changed in the billing document. Also the point to be considered is, it is a delivery based billing. What is the configuration required to ensure that , System should not allow pricing to be changed in billing document when it is getting created.
I have checked the forum and found no threads linked to it. Kindly help me in this regard.
Thanks in advance
Rgds,
Sivarajesh. JHi ,
In SPRO -> S&D-> Billing Documents ->Maintain copying Control for Billing documents. Here select for copying control for ( based on your case) delivery type to Invoice type (Eg: Invoice type F2: Delivery type : LF) and then go to Item and select Item Category.
And then go to Item Category details (Eg: TAN) . Here you find Pricing type and based on your requirement you can select. If not satisfying your need then you can modify the copying requirement.
Thanks,
Veerendra -
System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR
Hi,
I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
Thanks in advance
Thanks & Regards,
SureshHi,
Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
Message no. 06115
But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
LOOP AT TEKPO.
IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
Regards, -
After creation of PO system should not allow to change the price in PO
Hi There,
In my scenario once PO is created then after send to vendor PO print document,Users are changing the price in PO.so system should not allow to change the price in PO once PO got saved.
So please advice.Hi,
you could set in customizing for field selection keys the net price
to display for ME22N so that changes can not be made
(transaction OLME -> purchase order -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level).
Please check that you have set all the relevant field selection
groups to display: AKTV, ME22, ME22N... (read and apply note 30316)
Other workaround is try to do by yourself with the badi
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and send your own error message.
Regards,
Edit
Maybe you are looking for
-
Flash MX Preloader for external JPGs
Hey all! Any help would be greatly appreciated. In all honesty, I have searched and studied and worked to get this myself, which I do alot with code, etc. BUT I am going to admit I'm a "make it pretty on the outside" kind of guy, and coding makes my
-
Open a new form! Help needed
I am still new to this. I am trying to open a new_form from an already open form. I have assigned the trigger as follows. WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED New_form('FORM3'); Now, when i run the form I get the error FRM-40108:No Such: FORM3 When it clearly exsists
-
Struts tag library instead of JSTL
My developers here are not very well versed with JSTL . Is it advisable to use the Struts tag library instead of JSTL.
-
What's with the analyzing with the new update?
Has Apple turned into big brother? What is with the analyzing of my volume size with the new update? Sorry, I'm just always suspicious.
-
Hi All I am trying to change the eDir Role lookup schduled task's search filter. Does the scheduled task has a limitation of working with only one objectClass ? Please let me know if you have any information on the same. Thanks