Delivery Order is getting archived instead of getting saved

Hi,
I am working on SAP ECC AFS. When I post Sales Order using an interface, I am getting a message saying Delivery created, but it is actually getting archived. We just now upgraded to ECC 6.0 from R/3 4.6. Is this some setting which needs to be changed?
Regards,
Anusha

Hi Chand,
Is this issue only happening for a particular transaction type or for all?
There could be a solw server response time or a lot of developments / checks implemented. Check if they are causing the issue.
Also check the session timeout time for UI from your basis team.
Regards,
Saumya

Similar Messages

In which table chenges in sales orders are getting saved

Hi Experts,
I have a query
<b>in which table chenges in sales orders are getting saved</b>
Thanks & Regards
Prashant Gupta

Hi
goto SE16/se16n and enter the table name as CDHDR for header changes
here enter the transaction code in the selection screen as VA02 so that it will give the details of all sales order which have changed.
You can get the change doc object or document number in cdhdr enter the same in
CDPOS in SE16n if you want to know the changes done at item level or you also have the option of entering TABLE name in CDPOS in SE16N selection screen if you want to know changes done in a particular table
regards

Purchase Order not getting saved

while creating Purchase Order iam getting the PO number while trying to change in ME22N system is throwing the error MSG *"Express document "Update was terminated" received from author "mm_SAP"*
clicking on the inbox iam getting
Transaction.. ME21N
Error Info... System error: error during insert in table EINA
(ME_CREATE_DOCUMENT)
Message class ME
Message no 807
Edited by: Praveensap23 on Feb 22, 2011 10:11 AM

Hi There
Get the help from ABAPer, he may help you to fix the issue.
Thanks
Senthil

Order not getting saved with RFC user

Hi CRM experts,
We have custom report to update payment card details in CRM order. For an error order when I try to update the card details in CRM it successfully deactivates the "Contains Error(I1030)" status and saves the order.
Whereas the same error order when I try to update the card details through external system, the user is RFC user, the program does not deactivates the status I1030 and the order gets saved with error.
Initially I thought it is an authorization issue with RFC user, so I tried applying SAP_ALL access to RFC user but it did not work.
Kindly suggest the possible solution.
Thanks in advance
Meenu.

Hi Meenu,
The standard one order framework works in such a way that when any changes to any object like PARTNER , HEADER , ITEMS , CARDS etc take place, then after changes done, the system checks for any inconsistency for that particular object and displays error messages accordingly.
At the next change, the check runs again and the messages are removed. The checks are run through the standard event framework of BEFORE and AFTER. So in case the error messages are not getting removed, it means that these events are not getting triggered properly. I think that you are using individual FM for changing the details which could be something like CRM*CARD*MAINTAIN*OW*, you can try using CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN, as this FM triggers all events correctly.
/Hasan

Delivery document not getting updated

Dear Experts,
Till date our client was using VL04 for creating DA for only domestic sales, now they
are asking to provide facility to created DA for export shipment in VL04 and we have done customization for the same.
Now there are two separate (delivery document number) number ranges generated for
domestic and export sales.
Now my problem is : delivery document number generated for export sales is not getting
updated in database table VTRDI
Have any idea ??
Please advice
R.Karthik
Edited by: Karthik R on Sep 30, 2009 5:31 PM
Edited by: Karthik R on Sep 30, 2009 6:39 PM

Hi Lakshmipathi ,
Thank you so much.....for ur valuable advice !!
I have checked the table LIKP and LIPS ...and the export delivery number is getting saved
in these two tables...
But my problem is with creating shipment in VT01...as delivery number generated for export is not
getting picked in VT01 but for normal domestic orders it is getting picked.
I could not figure out where I went wrong??
could you please guide me on this issue.
R.Karthik
Edited by: Karthik R on Oct 5, 2009 8:46 AM

Sales order should not get saved without entering the material

Sales order is getting saved without entering the material. How to make material entry mandatory in sales order.. so that if i try to save the sales order without entering the material the system should create an error.
Please give a clue, if there is any way other than incompletion log.

Dear DV,
T. Code: SHD0
Create a Screen Variant for Transaction VA01
and maintain Field: Material as "Mandatory".
Best Reagrds,
Amit
Note: Following is the explaination with Incompletion-Procedure -
T. Code: OVA2 - Incompletion Log
Select Group: B - Sales Order Item; and Double Click "Procedures" (left-hand Dialog-Structure)
Select InCompletion Procedure: 20 - Standard; and double click "Fields" (left-hand Dialog-Structure)
Here, Maintain entry:
Table: VBAP
Field: MATNR
Screen: PKAU
Status: 4
Imp.: Create Z-Incompletion Procedure and make necessary changes, instead of changing a Standard one.
Alternatively, check with Arijeet's post in following thread:
How to restrict saving of a sales order without a material.

Creation of delivery order With Reference to Scheduling Agrrement

Hi,
Iam creating delivery order(VA01) with reference to scheduling agreement(VA31),in the delivery order iam getting grey on sold to party, I need the change mode in sold to party area.
And also i changed the copy control of scheduling agreement to salesorder there i put as in coping requirments as Headder Diffrent customer,But still iam getting grey in sold to party.
Regards,
Ashok.

Hi Ashok,
Scheduleing Agreement is basically a Contract between Sold-to Party and the company. In this type of agreement We have details like what is the Material, Qty, deliveyr date etc. Agreement itself is like a order and agreement also has schedule lines so you can directly create a delivery with ref to Scheduling agreement and Tcode for creating Delivery is VL01N and Not VA01. VA01 is for creating a sales order.
You need to set up conpy control between Scheduling agreement and Delivery and not Sales order.
For more info go thr below link:
http://web.mit.edu/sapr3/windocs/bpors11m.htm
Reward if it helps.
regards
Srini

An order is getting lock instead of all the configuration set right

Hi gurus tell me i raise a ticket pls let me kno_w**
" An order is getting lock instead of all the configuration set right. "

Welcome to the forum.
The message whatever you had provided is not enough. Anyway, check in XD05 whether the customer is blocked. Else give the error message number.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

In VA01 In Schedule line Delivery date not getting populated

Hello,
We have developed enhancement for VA01 tcode.
Depending upon the quatity entered for a material it should show one more item as free good.
If quatity is 10 for a line item 10 then it should show item 20 by default same mateerial and quatilty as 1.We have done this it is working fine.
But if we select free good item in our case it is 20 and click on schedule line item buttom all quaitity fields getting populated.but delivery date not getting populated for only free good.for line item 10 it showing properly.
Can any one please suggest what i need to do in order to display delivery date for free good.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.

Thanks for your response.
Actually i have seen technical settings for that field.it is rv45a-etdat.this field has value till MV45AFZZ.seen in debugger.
Looks like it is clearing some where after the above include.Any suggisitions welcome.Thanks again.

Delivery Notes keep getting generated

Hi All
I have a really challenging issue...
I have a number of Purchase Orders that were set up in 1999 and have been invoiced and Goods receipted.
For some reason delivery notes keep getting generated for these PO's - one last night dated 19/05/2010 for a PO in 1999
Now I think that the order is some kind of Stock transport order as the vendor is one of our plants and they keep complaining of stock being allocated for these deliveries
Now....I thought it would be as easy as going into the delivery note via (VL02N) and deleting the delivery requirement (line item) but this seems to back order the stock until another delivery note is generated.
I have looked at the PO and it seems as if the Delivery Completed indicator and the final delivery are not checked
I tried to check these and save the PO but it is asking me now to enter a delivery type (The field is greyed out though)
How can I get round this and stop these notes being generated? Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated
Thanks
Andy

Check your Delivery due list batch job variant and try to exclude prior year PO's.
May be you can select the lines and click on Block Icon.
Regards
Sai

[svn] 4634: First part of glue code for allowing Halo components to use the new Text Layout Framework , in order to get functionality such as bidirectional text.

Revision: 4634
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-01-22 17:38:56 -0800 (Thu, 22 Jan 2009)
Log Message:
First part of glue code for allowing Halo components to use the new Text Layout Framework, in order to get functionality such as bidirectional text.
Background:
TLF is making this possible by implementing a TLFTextField class. It is a Sprite that uses TLF to implement the same properties and methods as the legacy TextField class in the Player. Thanks to the createInFontContext() bottleneck method in UIComponent, it can be used by a properly-written Halo component (such as those in Flex 3) without any modifications to the component.
Note: Text should render similarly -- but is unlikely to render identically -- when a component uses TLFTextField vs. TextField. The width and height may be different, affecting layout; text could wrap differently; etc. This is a fact-of-life based on the fact that TLF/FTE and TextField are completely different text engines.
Whether a Halo component uses TLF or not to render text will be determined in Flex 4 by a new style, textFieldClass. (Gumbo components always use TLF.)
TLFTextField is currently only partially implemented. It does not yet support scrolling, selection, editing, multiple formats, or htmlText. Therefore it can only be used for simple display text, such as a Button label.
Details:
The TextStyles.as bucket 'o text styles now includes a non-inheriting textFieldClass style. It can be set to either mx.core.UITextField or mx.core.UITLFTextField. These are the Flex framework's wrapper classes around the lower-level classes flash.text.TextField (in the Player) and its TLF-based workalike, flashx.textLayout.controls.TLFTextField.
The global selector in defaults.css currently sets it to mx.core.UITextField using a ClassReference directive. For the time being, all Halo components will continue to use the "real" TextField.
The new UITLFTextField is a copy of UITextField, except that it extends TLFTextField instead of TextField. This class has been added to FrameworkClasses.as because no classes in framework.swc have a dependency on it. It will get soft-linked into applcations via the textFieldClass style.
The TLFTextField class currently lives in a fourth TLF SWC, textLayout_textField.swc. This SWC has been added to various build scripts. The external-library-path for building framework.swc now includes all four TLF SWCs, because UITLFTextField can't be compiled and linked without them. However, since they are external they aren't linked into framework.swc.
Properly-written Halo UIComponents access their text fields only through the IUITextField interface, and they create text fields like this:
textField = IUITextField(createInFontContext(UITextField));
(The reason for using createInFontContext() is to support embedded fonts that are embedded in a different SWF.)
The createInFontContext() method of UIComponent has been modified to use the textFieldClass style to determine whether to create a UITextField or a UITLFTextField.
With these changes, you can now write code like
to get two Buttons, the first of which uses UITextField (because this is the value of textFieldClass in the global selector) and the second of which uses UITLFTextField. They look very similar, which is good!
Currently, both Buttons are being measured by using an offscreen TextField. A subsequent checkin will make components rendering using UITLFTextField measure themselves using an offscreen TLFTextField so that measurement and rendering are consistent.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: None
Reviewer: Deepa
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/build.xml
    flex/sdk/trunk/build.xml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/defaults.css
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/FrameworkClasses.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/metadata/TextStyles.as
Added Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UITLFTextField.as

Many of your points are totally legitimate.
This one, however, is not:
…To put it another way, the design of the site seems to be geared much more towards its regular users than those the site is supposedly trying to "help"…
The design and management of the forums for more than five years have driven literally dozens of the most valuable contributors and "regulars" away from the forums—permanently.
The only conclusion a prudent, reasonable person can draw from this state of affairs is that Adobe consciously and deliberately want to kill these forums by attrition—without a the PR hit they would otherwise take if they suddenly just shut them down.

Sales order should get block if XYZ payment terms is used

Dear Expert,
The requirement is like,
If user add payment term XYZ manually in salse order then that sales order should get block for review purpose.
Note:
if user add that payment term in sales order client want that order should block no matter what reason , here client not concern about credit limit and any outstanding from customer side ,
Thanks in advance
hanumant

Hi,
You need to block orders with payment terms XYZ, or only when user changes from ABC to XYZ??
If first one is your requirment, you can do with userexit - USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT, and you need to create status profile for sales document type and assign to order type, in status profile put status AUTO - automatically approved, LOCK - when XYZ is payments terms it wil not and not create delivery & REJC- Rejected, when approver dont want to approve he can reject.
In sales order userexit you need write logic when paytemnt terms is XYZ then put status as LOCK.
New repor need to create to approve LOCKed orders so that user execute and approves or rejects.
If only user change to XYZ, then you need to write logic in prepare userexit, but it will be tricy, need to store values in tempapory memory, ceck with abaper,

In Delivery i am getting different Incoterms

Hi Experts,
I have created one sales order, after that i have delivery for that. In that time i am getting different incoterms in delivery. In CMr and Sales order i have same incoterms. But in delivery i am getting different incoterms. Can you please tell me from where its getting picked.

Dear Jp Reddy,
Is ship to party is different from sold to party !!!
If yes in sales order you may have sold to party incoterms but when you go to delivery system may determine according to ship to party.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

I've done everything I know in order to get my calendar in iCloud synchronized with my macBook, my IPad and my iPhone, but get no success. I've checked if all devices are set to the same account. Can you help me?

I've done everything I know in order to get my calendar in iCloud synchronized with my macBook, my IPad and my iPhone, but get no success. I've checked if all devices are set to the same account. Can you help me?

The only thing I can see strange is that when I login my iCloud account through my principal email address, when I check my preferences is marked an @me.com address that is old and I don't use it anymore, but I can't erase it or even change it.

Credit card Orders are getting blocked with credit check

Hi All
In our system, If customer's credit exposure is greater then 100 % then all the credit card orders are getting blocked with credit check even though it has valid authorization. Is this sap standard behaviour?....is there any setting that will always exclude credit card orders when it has valid authorization
Thanks in advance for looking into this

Hi,
In OVA8- under document controlling- check the existing routinue 1 for orders etc., else modify as per your requirement
Thanks
Chidamabram

Delivery Order is getting archived instead of getting saved

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for