Delivery split issue with PO (STO)

Hi All,
I created 4 STO . While creating delivery it automatically creating delivery splits ( two deliveres for smultiple PO). I checked the ship to party , route,ship conditions , unloading point . every thing is same. among 4 STO only one line items is splitting in to 2nd delivery.
User required only one delivery for  all STO's.
The same is working in test boxes fine, and it is not happend in production system.
please do the needful
Regards
Raju.

Hi,
Check these notes:
SAP Note 546668 - FAQ: Delivery split when creating deliveries
SAP Note 166397 - Delivery split according to customer field ZUKRL
Regards,
Eduardo
PD: I forgot these:
Note 13448 - Combining stock transfer orders into one delivery
Note 332276 - Collective note: VL10 consulting
Note 198137 - VL10: Customer-specific enhancements / user exits
Edited by: Eduardo Hinojosa on Sep 24, 2009 12:07 PM

Similar Messages

  • Delivery split for multi-line STO

    Hi,
    I have a 2 line STO with difeerent material in each line. For both the materials the transportation groups is different.
    However for both the materials in the STO, shipping data is same. which means ship-to party,shiping point,condition,route etc. is same.
    But when i am trying to create outbound delivery using VL10B , systme creates 2 different deliveries instead of single delivery containing 2 line itmes  of the STO.
    However when we create sales order of these material, systme creates only single outbound delivery. Then why is it createting diferent delivery for STO ? We need only 1 delivery.
    Can any one help ??
    Best Regards.

    Hi,
    Pls check in 0VLK the Delivery Type used in your STO configuration and see if you have Delivery Split by Warehouse Num or Delivery Split Part (for Delivery Split for Additional Partners) checked.
    Thanks.

  • Delivery creation issue - Inter Company STO

    Dear All,
    I had configured the Intercompany stock transfer scenario. When I am trying to create a delivery, I am getting the below message.
    "When the system checked whether saving delivery was
    permitted, it determined that the requirements stored in
    Define Incompletion Procedures for this document do not
    allow this subsequent function."
    I had removed the incompletion log assignment from the Delivery type NLCC & Item category NLC.
    But still I am getting the error.
    What may be the issue?
    Rgds,
    Senni.B

    what did you specify in OSS search? I used VL10 User Exit, and got the desired results.
    A summary of all user exits from Include RVV50TOP is contained in the advance corrections as comment Includes.
    Through this, every user exit can be accessed by forward navigation from Include RVV50TOP via Include V50R_USEREXITS.

  • Delivery split through VLSP along with JIT Calls with AW Partner profiles

    Hi SAP SD/LE Guru's,
    I have one critical issue to resolve immediately in my implementation of SAP 4.6C system in multinational automotive industry. It's in the area of Delivery split along with AW - Duns number partner profile and JIT calls.
    Here is the scenario:
    1. JIT(Just In time) calls will be created through EDI based on the ship-to, PO Nos, Duns number.
    2. The requirements will be updated in Scheduling Agreements JIT Delivery schedule.
    3. Picking is done based on the requirements.
    4. Packing, Deliveries and Handling units are created: Note: Each handling unit is linked to one JIT Call.
    5. Based on the Shipments, Deliveries needs to be split into further sub-deliveries.
        Ex. One Delivery has two HU's. This needs to be split into another delivery so that one HU need to be detached from original and attach to new delivery. At the same time corresponding JIT call also need to be detached from original delivery and attach to new delivery. This can be done through VLSP : Subsequent split(Outbound delivery). Split profile: 003 - split based on Quantities.
    The issue: When executing delivery split using VLSP and split profile: 003, the system is terminating and giving short dump.
    The error analysis says that AW - Duns number is creating the problem. The short dump occurs in SAPLV05I in Function module: SD_PARTNER_UPDATE.
    There is an SAP note: 154766 related to this problem says that Partner header should be used only once in copy control.
    But in customization of copy control from Sales order to Delivery, there is no VBPA Partner header.
    I appreciate if you can provide solution for delivery split and resolve this short dump issue.
    Thanks,
    Murali Chintakunta

    In reference to this change in the Custom Reports... Better experience when exporting data - to prevent customer confusion when exporting data from Mac computers, we have removed the export to excel option and exporting in CSV format by default.
    What is the customer confusion we are trying to stop here? I've got even more confused customers at the moment because all of a sudden they can't find the export to excel option but know it exists if they log in on a PC?
    Mark

  • Delivery Split at 2 levels

    Hi Experts,
    My requirement is to split SO items into mutiple deliveries. An example as below.
    Sales Order
    Item     Material     Qty    Unit
    1         A               1       PC
    2         B               1       PC
    3         C               3       PC
    I am able to do a Delivery SPlit using Copy routine and filling field ZUKRL and got the final 3 delivaries as below:
    Delivery
    Header Item     Material     Qty    Unit
    1           010         A               1       PC
    2           010         B               1       PC
    3           010         C               3       PC
    But my requirement is again to split an item based on HU (handling Unit, from packing Proposal) and put some quanities in one delivery and remaining in other delivery as below.
    Header Item     Material     Qty    Unit
    1           010         A               1       PC
    2           010         B               1       PC
    2           020         C               1       PC
    3           010         C               2       PC
    Please advice how I can achieve this.
    Thanks!!!
    -Sangar

    With a routine you need to know all the split criteria upfront. You can't split once and then pass the delivery through the routine again. Fill in the field with all the criteria at once (use CONCATENATE).
    Also consider using the standard Delivery Split functionality with the split profiles.

  • Exclusion MRP Outbound TF delivery goods issue

    Dear guru ,
    I have an outbound delivery goods issue with movement 313.
    The MD04 evidence the outbound delivery as negative requirement.
    But this a TF between the same plant.
    How can i exclude this element in MD04 and MRP ?
    Thanks.

    Dear ,
    With MRP Type ND mrp don't consider all requirement.
    I have mrp type PD and i don't understand why MD04 consider delivery goods issue with movement 313 only with negative requirement.
    This is TF between the same plant.
    Bye.

  • GR for a STO with SD delivery and Batches with split valuation X

    Hello,
    We have a problem with the Goods Receipts for Stock Transfer Orders between plants for materials subject to batch split and split valuation with valuation type X.
    The scenario is very similar to the one explained on this thread: STO:problem with batch valuated material
    When creating the the STO, it automatically sets a valuation type that is not be the appropriate one, we cannot use only one valuation type per position because we can use more than one batch (and valuation type). The outbound delivery has the correct valuation types for each batch and material but when doing the GR at the receiving plant, it only takes into account the valuation type indicated in the STO with no chance to change it.
    I have seen the Note 212532 but we are not working with active ingredients.
    Does anybody know a useful EP to use?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Javier.

    Well, we can change the valuation type before Posting the goods issue of the delivery, but in most cases we need more than one batch (each batch has a different valuation type) for each item (material) in the purchase order.
    We can do this at delivery level but the GR only takes into account the valuation type of the purchase order.
    Thanks.

  • Issue with STO over delivery

    I am sure this topic has been taken up so many times before. I have browsed through almost all of them. I still do not have a way of restricting STO over delivery! Require your expertise!!.
    My requirement is that STO over deliver should not occur when using VL10* transactions alone.
    We tried to export a flag (say delv_flag)from program 'RVV50R10C'  to shared buffer and import the same into BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC (DELIVERY_FINAL_CHECK) to capture error message when STO over delivery is created. The entire logic is built based on this flag alone.We are deleting the flag in V50R_MAIN of the program 'RVV50R10C'.
    There are some issues with this method:
    1. In some cases the delete flag statement gets executed before importing from memory and hence an STO over delivery gets created. (I don't know how or why!).
    2. When VL10* transaction is executed, the delivery flag is set. At this point in time, if the user tries to delete delivery without exiting the transaction, the BADI will get triggered and error message will be displayed. This is not correct functionality since error message should be displayed only for VL10* transactions.
    Suggestion:
    If I change the location of exporting the flag to include 'LV50R_VIEWF43' (form delivery_create), do you suppose it would work? Would Idocs trigger this?
    If anybody has worked on similar requirement please share your inputs. Urgent!!!!
    PS:
    I have read about delivery tolerances too "The overdelivery tolerance functionality is available only for the deliveries created with reference to sales orders and not for deliveries created with reference for PO's or STO's".

    Dear Sapna Morey
    I think OMCQ T.Code-- Select message M7--024 Change from Waring to error
    Please try once with this it may work To control over delivery tolarency in STO
    Dear  Lakshmipathi G sir
    i have one doubt please clear me sir please
    To control Over delivery tolarance in sap standard  is not available , then what is the use of the above one.
    Because i have searched a lot , i didnt find the logic about this
    Thanks a lot sir please help me sir
    Thanks

  • Issue with BATCH SPLIT with Inbound Delivery

    Hi,
    We are in an SAP upgrade project from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, we would require to develop an Interface Program to perform BATCH SPLIT for an Inbound Delivery, I tried with BAPI BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CHANGE but it seems to be work only to change the existing line items, by requirement is to create new BATCH SPLIT for a given inbound delivery, can anyone help me in finding the appropriate BAPIs, thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Bala

    Hi Bala,
    Have you tried BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC? If you check the documentation of this BAPI, at the bottom of it there's a statement:
    If you report back batch splits that were created in the ERP system, you cannot fill the hierarchy fields HIERARITEM and USEHIERITM.
    If you created split items in the WM system and have reported back, these two hierarchy fields must contain information.
    BR
    Raf

  • Delivery Split during creation of delivery for STO

    While creating a delivery for STO, delivery is being created for individual line items. On analysis of VL 033 message, I found that the delivery split is happening because of Function SH: Unloading Point.
    The message is
    <i>"delivery split due to conflicting header data (Function SH: Unloading Point: <-> UP0065)"
    Item 000020 cannot be shipped in the same delivery with the other items in the document because the header data (Function SH: Unloading Point) is different. The Function SH: Unloading Point item field has the value UP0065, but in the delivery checked for concatenation it has the value .</i>
    This unloading point has been maintained in the customer master data (and needs to be maintained).
    I have also been told by my Basis consultant that note 842704 is not valid.
    Why is this happening and how to prevent it.
    Lakshman

    Sorry... but I could not see either the delivering point or the unloading point in the material sales: general / plant view. Those fields are not visible on the screen. I could also not find them in the config (I was checking if they are suppressed).
    Regards,
    Lakshman

  • Issue with copy control of Delivery document to Billing document

    Hi All,
    I am having some issue with copy control of Delivery document to Billing document.
    I am having two line items in Delivery documetn, one is for item to be delivered to customer and other which is created due to batch determination.
    Now , when I create billing document (VF01) with reference to this delivery document , I want only one line item (for the one which needs to be delivered to customer).
    I have used following things in  copy contro from ZLF to ZF2:
    Copying requirements: 004 ( Deliv-related item)
    Data VBRK/VBRP: 007 "(Inv.Split (Rec/Div))
    Is it correct or shall I use something else, so I have only one line item in Billing document.
    Regards
    Nidhi

    Pls. search the forum.
    Pls. refer the below link -
    Line with 0 quantity for main item with batch split
    Thanks

  • Issue with Return Delivery for movement type 262

    Hi,
    I have got a strange issue, the user is trying to do a MIGO Return Delivery for a material document using movement type 262, this he claims has been doing it for many materials. However when i go to the MKPF table i see the transaction Code field to be MIGO_GI for all the material documents for which he claims to have done return delivery. But under this transaction code we have only 4 options - Display, Issue, Cancel and Remove from storage.
    Now when he tries to do the return delivery for movement type 262 he get an error message "Check table T156N: entry RL 262  does not exist" , but this has been very well maintained in the table.
    Can you please let me know -
    If it is possible to do a return delivery for a movement type 262?
    If yes how to address the above error encountered.
    Thanks in advance
    Sachin

    Hi Sachin,
    If you think of return delivery to vendor with or w/o PO reference you can use movement types 161, 122, 124 as default settings.
    Movement type 261 means withdrawal against production order and its reverse is MVT 262. The latter can be used e.g. via MB1A (or you can make storno of a confirmation by 261).
    Are you sure your user is using the correct terminology ('return delivery')? Please check the material documents he/she claims to have booked as return delivery. (in MB51 you can get a list of all material movements of MVT 261 that belong to 'your user' and after that you can open the material document and check through which transaction the booking was made.)
    BR
    Csaba

  • Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

    Hi Xperts
    We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
    However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
    1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
    2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
    Regards
    Soumick 

    Hi,
    Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
    Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
    Option-1:
    Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
    OR
    Option-2:
    Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
    OR
    Option-3:
    Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
    Based the above one setting, system  will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
    NOTE:
    Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
    Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Issue with file to file in PI 7.3 (Splitting huge files)

    Hi All,
    Need your help in fixing the issue with file splitting
    We are doing some sample scenarios(file to file) on PI 7.3 server.
    We are trying to split a 10MB file by using the 'Advanced Mode' option in the sender file adapter. We gave max split file size as 2MB. The file got split into 5 chunks and was successfully sent to receiver file adapter. In receiver adapter we are able to see that. But in the target folder only 1 file was seen with size 2MB. All other chunks were missing. We need to have the whole data sent from source to target.
    How to fix this issue? please provide your inputs.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Lakshmi Narayana

    PI 7.3 has capable of processing larger size files.
    Questions:
    Have you picked EOIO quality of service? Hope you dont do mapping or content conversion for this file?
    have you seen this link
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a06d79f3-d094-2e10-1a81-f4d802d0bcf1?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/44/682BCD7F2A6D12E10000000A1553F6/frameset.htm

  • Issue with Select Query in the Delivery userexit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT

    Hi All,
    I am facing a strang issue with delivery userexit
    1) I have a delivery user exit MV50AFZ1 - USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT.
    2) In this user exit. I have written a select query as shown below
    *Get the already delivered data
        SELECT vbeln
               vgbel
               vgpos
               erdat
               erzet
               lfimg
          FROM lips
          INTO TABLE t_lips
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_xlips_reference
         WHERE vgbel EQ t_xlips_reference-vgbel
           AND vgpos EQ t_xlips_reference-vgpos.
        IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
        ENDIF.
    3) The use of the above select query is to find out if there is any delivery that has already been created for the reference slaes order for which the current delivery is being created.
    4) The issue here is that for the FIRST DELIVERY, this select query should fail becuase there is no delivery created earlier and LIPS table would not have data. But, I am seeing some data getting populated in the internal table. The data that I am seeing in the internal table is the data of XLIPS which is nothing but the one that is about to get saved in the database after finishing this userexit.
    5) STRANGE Point is that this is working fine in case if I create delivery using the transaction VL01N. But, if I create delivery using VL10A program I am facing this issue.
    << Removed >>
    Thanks,
    Babu Kilari
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jun 16, 2010 4:22 PM

    Then why don't you add
    AND vbeln NE likp-vbeln

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem opening Bridge CS5 in Windows 7

    When I open Bridge CS5 in Windows 7, I get a pop-up window from User Account Contro that asks "Do you want to allow the following program to make changes to this computer?"  The program listed is Bridge.  If I say NO, Bridge doesn't open.  If I say Y

  • Greyed Out TV Episodes on My iPhone

    Hello, I use the latest version of iTunes on my Windows 7 PC to sync with my iPhone 4S, which is running iOS 7.0.2. Ever since I updated to iOS 7, whenever I connect my iPhone to the computer, it will show that there are 4 new items in "TV Shows" und

  • Julian Convert

    Hi all. I have Julian dates in my database I want to convert it to date type. How can I do it? Thank you very much...

  • Vista x64 and 4GB Issue resolved? nforc

    Ok, i have a fatalty card and its in a 2nd computer since i got the popping noises with previos drivers, but now with this new one i have hope ^^ ok my question, has anyone tested the Fatalty (or any other X-Fi) on vista x64 with 4gb+ ram? on an nfor

  • My mac is running slow. How can I fix this issue?

    Hi, My Mac has been running very slow for quite some time now. It takes a very long time to load a window and it freezes at times. Does this mean that I have a virus? If so, how can I fix this issue? Can you suggest a good and inexpensive spyware sof