Delivery subcriteria for Vendor Evaluation

Hi
How are the scores computed for the subcriteria in Deliovery?
Regards
Soumen

Hi,
Delivery criteria is comprised of following Sub-criteria;
- On-time delivery performance
- Quantity reliability
- Compliance with shipping instructions
- Confirmation date
On-Time Delivery Performance: - This subcriterion is used to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
Quantity Reliability: - This subcriterion is used to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
"On-time delivery performanceu201D and u201CQuantity reliabilityu201D always have to be seen in conjunction. You can specify for each material (in the material master record) or for all materials (in the system settings) the minimum quantity of the ordered materials that must be delivered in order for a goods receipt to be included in the evaluation. This enables you to avoid a situation in which a punctual goods receipt involving only a small quantity of ordered materials is included in the evaluation with a good score for u201Con-time delivery performanceu201D. If this minimum quantity is not delivered, the vendor is not awarded a score. However, in this case the vendor receives a bad score for quantity reliability.
Compliance With Shipping Instructions: - This subcriterion is used to determine how precisely a vendor complies with your instructions for the shipping or packing of a material.
Confirmation Date: - This subcriterion is used to determine whether a vendor adheres to a previously confirmed delivery date (that is, whether the goods are actually received on the date previously confirmed by the vendor).

Similar Messages

Delivery rating in vendor evaluation

Can I know on what logic system calculates the delivery rating, for schedule agreement which has more than one schedule lines.
Regards,
M.M

Dear Magesh,
This is for On time delivery:
===========================================================
At the time of a goods receipt against a purchase order, the system checks whether the delivery was on time or late:
GR date - delivery date = date variance
If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity is to be taken into account.
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If no value exists, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If there no such value in this case either, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If no value exists, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery date adhered to, the variance is zero and the system awards the highest points score for the relevant goods receipt.
If the delivery is not on time, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
In the process, the system searches for the standardizing value as follows:
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If not, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value in this case either, one of the following values is used:
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value, one of the following values is used
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
The new score is then included in the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor Date variance defined in Customizing.
When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor's score for "On-Time Delivery Performance".
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and included in the existing score for on-time delivery performance for the vendor
Adherence to Conf. Date :
===========================================================
1. When a goods receipt is posted for an order item, the system checks whether open inbound deliveries exist for the order item, i.e. inbound deliveries for which no goods receipts have yet been recorded.
If open inbound deliveries exist, the system checks whether the date previously notified by the vendor has been adhered to or whether the goods receipt date differs from the date thus confirmed:
GR date - date confirmed by vendor in shipping notification = date variance
2. If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity has been defined in Customizing.
a. If you have not set a minimum delivery quantity, goods receipts representing partial deliveries will also be included in the calculation of the score.
b. If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
c. If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery is on time, the variance is zero. This means that the system awards the maximum score for the goods receipt.
3. If the delivery date is not in accordance with the notified one, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
4. The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
5. The new score is then merged with the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor On-time delivery performance/Timeliness of service provision (defined in Customizing for Vendor Evaluation under Purchasing organization data for Vendor Evaluation).
6. When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendors score for adherence to the confirmation date.
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and merged with the existing score for adherence to the confirmation date for the vendor.
Regards,
w1n

Role for Vendor Evaluation

Hi experts
i'd like to know what are the standard role for vendor evaluation and vendor qualify in SRM EBP 7.0.
Regards
Andrea

The vendor evaluation questionnaire is always triggred when a the user posts a confirmation RIGHT?
/SAPSRM/RECIPIENT -SAP SRM Server Role
com.sap.pct.srm.ro_goodsrecipient-Portal Role
Supplier Evaluation
You can use Supplier Evaluation in SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SAP SRM) to evaluate your suppliers by means of Web-based surveys. You can tailor individual surveys and questionnaires, and select the criteria to evaluate. You can then transfer the data that you gather from the questionnaires and surveys to SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence (SAP BI). You can use this information to help you select suppliers and negotiate conditions.
For more information on reporting in SAP BI, see the SAP NetWeaver documentation on SAP Help Portal at http://help.sap.com SAP NetWeaver SAP NetWeaver <release> Library SAP Library SAP NetWeaver Library BI Content Supplier Relationship Management Supplier Evaluation .
Prerequisites
You need to compile questionnaires using the WebSurvey Cockpit. For more information, see the SAP NetWeaver documentation on SAP Help Portal at http://help.sap.com SAP NetWeaver SAP NetWeaver <release> Library SAP Library SAP NetWeaver Library SAP NetWeaver by Key Capability Application Platform by Key Capability Business Services Web Survey .
When you use the Supplier Survey Cockpit (see below), you can access the WebSurvey Cockpit from the SAP NetWeaver Portal. To compile a questionnaire, in this case, click on the Supplier Evaluation tab strip. Then click on Create Questionnaire.
Features
There are two different methods to collect data to evaluate supplier performance:
Event-driven evaluation. For example, when saving an invoice, a questionnaire is presented to the user
Ad-hoc evaluation through surveys managed with the Supplier Survey Cockpit
Event-Driven Evaluation
SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SAP SRM) supports event-driven questionnaires for two specific occasions:
Saving of a confirmation
Saving of an invoice
Note
The event-driven evaluation and the ad-hoc evaluation use separate InfoProviders in SAP NetWeaver BI. The InfoProvider that is used for event-driven evaluation is also used for evaluation triggered from out of the Advanced Supplier List.
End of the note.
These events trigger a questionnaire, which pops up on the screen or enable a button to open the questionnaire. To carry out event-driven evaluation, you first have to specify in Customizing when and under which circumstances you want the evaluation to take place. For example, you can define that the evaluation is to occur for certain product categories, or suppliers, or purchasing organizations. You can also define the frequency (for example, every invoice/confirmation, or every second invoice/confirmation, and so on). For more information, see Customizing: Integration with Other SAP Components Data Transfer to the SAP Business Information Warehouse Settings for Application-Specific DataSources (SRM) Define Events for Supplier Evaluation in SRM
Process
Supplier Evaluation is used in the Confirmation and Invoice applications to evaluate day-to-day activities on the basis of operational documents. It can also be used from the Approved Supplier List.
Supplier Evaluation Examples Application
Possible Questionnaire
Possible Criteria
Confirmation
Evaluation of goods
Delivery on time?
Condition of packaging?
Confirmation
Evaluation of services*
Was the service performed in a timely fashion?
Quality of service performed?
Invoice
Evaluation of invoice
Invoice quantity = confirmed quantity?
Was the invoice clearly presented?
Approved Supplier List
Evaluation of supplier
Reliability of supplier?
Price transparency of supplier?
Note
*Note the data protection regulations that apply when evaluating services.
End of the note.
For more information about SAP NetWeaver BI Reporting, see SAP Help Portal at http://help.sap.com SAP NetWeaver BI Content Supplier Relationship Management Supplier Evaluation
Ad-Hoc Evaluation: Supplier Survey Cockpit
The Supplier Survey Cockpit is an application with which you can manage surveys to gain information about your suppliers. After completion of a survey, the survey data is transferred to SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence (SAP NetWeaver BI) for reporting. Analyzing the survey outcomes in SAP NetWeaver BI helps you to always be up on your suppliers' performance regarding, for example, reliability, quality, and service.
The Supplier Survey Cockpit enables you to gather information independently of a certain purchasing event. With the Supplier Survey Cockpit, you can do the following:
Set up a survey
Assign a questionnaire to the survey
Distribute the questionnaire via e-mail and
Monitor the responses
Features
To access the Supplier Survey Cockpit, choose Supplier Evaluation and then Survey Management under Detailed Navigation.
By default, you find three queries: A survey query, a survey package query, and a survey monitor query. Depending on the query you choose, the table below the queries displays different information.
To manage surveys, choose the survey query. Click on Create to create a new survey. Select a survey from the table and click on Display, Edit, or Delete to display, change, or delete a survey.
To manage survey packages, choose the survey package query and click on the corresponding buttons.
To download the table contents in MS Excel format, click on Export.
For more information on the queries, which serve to monitor surveys, see Survey Monitoring.
BR
MUTHU

System setting for vendor evaluation incomplete

HI....
I want to caryout automatic vendor evaluation when i run t code ME63, its show an error system setting for purchase org incomplete where as i have maintained all the parameters from standarfd 0001, can anyone tell me how to carry out ven evaluation.
Regards
SARFRAZ

Hi,
Select SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Vendor Evaluation. Select following criteria -
1) Define Weighing keys - Here define weighing keys in addition to 01- Equal Weighing & 02- Unequal Weighing (if required)
2) Define Criteria - Here 5 standard criteria are maintained. Maintain additional criteria if required. Also maintain sub-criteria. Each main criteria contains some standard subcriteria. If required you may maintain additional subcriteria upto 20 per main criteria.
3) Define Scope List - Here you may maintain how the evaluated vendors should be ranked.
4) Define Purchase Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation - Here you may maintain main criteria & sub-criteria for your purchasing organisation. Also maintain score for equal & unequal weighing. Maintain point score for automatic criteria for each percentage vainance
Hope this fulfils your query
Regards

Additional functionality for vendor evaluation in ECC 6.0

Hi folks,
Can any one help me in getting the information below.
Is there any additional functionality for vendor evaluation in ECC 6.0 when compared to ECC 4.7
Pls let me know the functionality and the difference.
Thanks
Vasanth.

Hi
Is there any additional functionality for vendor evaluation in ECC 6.0 when compared to ECC 4.7
The Solution Browser lets you enter start and target releases for functional areas, and provides you with the information about the new functionalities.
You find the tool from our homepage at http://service.sap.com/erp (see the tool box on the right hand side).
regards
Andreas Rudolph

Additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N).

Hi,
I like to add two additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N). Based on which vendor evaluation will be calculated.
1. Safety/Envt Upkeep
2. Morale
These two are added in SPRO->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation ->Define Criteria. But not displayed in ML81N->Vendor Evaluation tab.
Existing criteria. 1) Quality of Service and 2) Service Timeliness are already available.
Thanks in advance.
Chetan Shah

Hello Chetan,
have you checked note 79166 "MM-SRV Hint: Vendor evaluation for service"?
Define an evaluation criterion for services in Customizing of the vendor evaluation to be able to use the vendor evaluation also for the services management.The main criterion must contain the determination methods 'C' (determination from the quality valuation of the service) and 'D' (determination from the timeliness rating of the service) in the sub-criteria.
Kind Regards
TomT

Entering the scores in service entry sheet for vendor evaluation

Hi
I could not able to enter the scores for vendor evaluation in service entry sheet. How to do it.
With regards
G Narendra kumar

Hi
While defining the Sub Criteria for Service, you have select the Scoring Method as C (Determination from quality rating of service) or D (Determination from timeliness rating of service).Then u can find a tab for Vendor evaluation in Service Entry sheet where you can enter the scores for service.
Regards
Ramakrishna

No grouping maintained for vendor evaluation

Hi Experts,
I have loaded data till DSO 0SR_VE_CP successfully using Data Source 0WS_DATA_1_C. But when I am trying to load the data into the Cube 0SR_VE_C2 i am getting following error message:
No grouping maintained for vendor evaluation (Message no. SRM_VE014)
It would be appreciated if you help me step by step as i am new to this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Niranjan Chechani
Edited by: Niranjan Chechani on Oct 20, 2011 11:03 AM

Hi Niranjan,
I'm trying to activate the standard data flow for DSO 0SR_VE_CP in Business Content, but no transformation between DSO -> DataSource is available there.
How did you manage to load Supplier evaluation data into DSO 0SR_VE_CP from DS 0WS_DATA_1_C ?
Thanks in advance.

ME6H : point score for vendor evaluation

Dear guru ,
In vendor evaluation analysis for on-time delivery performance
I can see fields point score 1 and point score 2.
Can you explain me which is the difference between these two fields ?
Thanks in advance.

HI,
ON TIME DEL 1-it is for a specific period(day,month,yr)
ON TIME DEL 1-cumilative value

Standard report for Vendor Evaluation

Hi everyone,
Is there any standard reports (ALV) to display Vendor evaluation ranking list except ME65, ME6B, ME6H.
any other Program names will also do...
Thanks
Sukriti...

hi
S_ALR_87012990 - Evaluation Comparison
ME6H - Standard Analysis: Vendor Evaluation
ME6E - Evaluation Records Without Weighting
ME6C - Vendors Without Evaluation
ME6B - Display Vendor Evaluation for Material
ME65 - Evaluation Lists
regards
kunal

Custom report for vendor evaluation

Hai All,
My client requires custom report to show the vendor evaluation i.e., it has to show the working how it has arrived at the final score, to be clear systems works automatically and displays the final score based on certain main and sub criteria that working has to be shown in a table format for the purpose of TPM audit.
Regards
R.Senthilnambi

Hi Senthil,
u can download the documents from sap help to show the logic to ur audit, how sap will calculate the scores.
If they insist for certain data with logic, u can develop a z-report and show them for 10 or 20 materials.
hope this resolves ur problem

Is Quality management module required to be used for vendor evaluation?

Hi,
There is vendor evaluation functionality in MM. Is use of quality management module is mandatory for this? I wish to track the performance of vendor regarding quality (How much he has supplied, out of which how many are accepted and how many are rejected). Can I get this report without using QM?
Thanks in advance,
Satish

you can enter Quality results manually in vendor evealuation, so QM is not necessary for this, however with QM you can get the scores semi-automatic and automatically.

PO Valuation Type for Vendor Evaluation

Dear Gurus
I want to ask, can the Vendor evaluation program in SAP check the Purch.Order up to Valuation type ?
So the VE program can differ the valuation type in Purchase order.
Any respond are highly regarded
Thanks and Best Regards
Christian
Edited by: C J Lee on Feb 1, 2011 6:38 AM

Hi Piyush,
Your answer is correct. Val type does not come from info record to MRP created PRs, even there is a fixed vendor in the PR, coming from source list.
But, this happens in the PO, that val type is an obligatory field, for a split valuated material.
In PR, it can only be maintained manually, I guess.

Mass Maintain weighting key for vendor evaluation.?

Hi experts
Can anybody give some inputs for below issue
1.How to maintain weighting key for vendors .
2.How to maintain weighting key for all vendors in mass .(Mass maintainence)
3.How to get the report of vendor ranking list duration wise (Month, year..etc).
Regards
MM group

weighting keys is customizing, and this is certainly not by vendor.
you define one weighting key and then you run vendor evaluation using this weighting key.

Smoothing factors for Vendor Evaluation for Services

Hi Team,
How to apply smoothing factors for Quality and Timeliness of services in External Services. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
ANita.

Hi ,
I will try to explain with one example
Actually in vendor evaluation , we are going to get only one percentage say for a material A for example Qty reliability - smoothing factor is 0.20
Material A is ordered by so many purchase orders and many goods receipts are done in many times. Goods receipt is done 6 times till now and the score is 80% . Now GR is done for 7th time . If the qty reliability is 100 % for this GR
the score is calculated in the following way
80%0.8+100%0.2 --- this the score after the 7th goods receipt....
Hope now u understand .... If u still have queries please post your feedback...
If u are satisfied , please reward points
Regrads
Mani

Delivery subcriteria for Vendor Evaluation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for