Dell PowerEdge SC1420 with Ultra 320 scsi dirves

I am having a problem with installing Solaris 10 on the Dell PowerEdge SC1420 with Ultra 320 SCSI drives using PERC 320/DC Controller. The installation hangs at Configuring Devices and gives me some output messages:
NOTICE: MSG From Adapter: NMI ISR: NMI_BUS_INTERFACE_UNIT_ERROR
NOTICE: MSG From Adapter: NormPrioCommand was received with Fib StructType = 0xf
The notices keeps cycling.
Has anyone experience this issue?
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thank you,
Brian

Update:
I've got the box to install Solaris 10, however, I had to remove 2 sticks of memory. Originally, the box came with 4GB of memory but now I am down to 2GB. Don't know why this is the case but I am able to proceed with the installation without any error or notice messages. Can someone explain to me why this is the case? I will put the memory sticks back in and boot with the OS installed to see what happens and will update my results.
Thanks,
Brian

Similar Messages

Dell PowerEdge Servers with non-dell storage

yes I do I have a few 2950's that I run with WD red drives they work fine. moslty that stuff is to keep warranties upheld and to keep repeat customers coming back. its up to you how much you want to deal with. some of the raid functions and raid configurations may not be available if they have custom firmware from Xbyte or require custom firmware installed.personally if the server hardware is past dell's warranty I am using the cheapest most reliable drives I can get my hands on because at that point its on me any way. that also means wiping the PERC controller to default and rolling with default settings and then modifying them to what I need.Then again it goes back to how much responsibility do you want on you for this hardware. if you want as little as possible play by your distributors rules and have little or take it all yourself...

Hi,
I am pricing out some refurbished Dell PowerEdge servers primarily from xbyte.com and received feedback from them that they are extremely apprehensive about using non-dell storage in the server due to the custom firmware in the drives themselves. That being said they offer non-dell hard drives with custom xbyte firmware which apparently work... and yet they will still report a non-mission critical error in the manager.
Does anyone run production servers with 3rd party drives? If it is not recommended to do so, does anyone run the "Xbyte drive firmware" in production servers?
Thanks!
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Ultra 320 SCSI card with Snow Leopard Server?

First off, sorry if this is the wrong place for a thread on Snow Leopard server.
I have an older Intel Xserve (xserve1,1) with the Apple-branded Ultra320 SCSI PCI-X card. This isn't a third-party card, this is the one from the Apple Store.
So, are these confirmed to continue to work under 10.6? My server runs 10.4 (I'm skipping 10.5).
Thanks!

Hi
A Beta version is exactly just that. No-one apart from Apple knows for certain what the release version will support. Installing a Beta version of anything on a Production Server would not be a good idea in my view. Although one could risk it if a fully working bootable clone of the current Server was done first prior to installing the Beta (or an update for that matter). Perhaps it's just my cautious nature but I personally would not risk it.
I've been part of the AppleSeed program for 10.6 Server and Client from the outset and am testing both on my laptop.
Tony

Xserve G5 with Apple Supplied LSI Logic Ultra 320 SCSI Card

The Xserve G5 has been running 10.4.10 and 10.4.11. It also has the Apple supplied FibreChannel card installed.
I have tried installing this card into the Xserve and so far have been unable to get it to work, there are two symptoms...
1) The card is visible in System Profiler, no devices connected to it show. I've tried various combinations of termination, no change.
2) After a random period of time the Mac goes to 100% processor utilization on both processors and stays there. The Mac can then no longer be accessed remotely and stays that way. This occurs whether or not any cabling is connected.
This card is the one that Apple lists as a part for the Xserve G5 in GSX. However I've seen a few sites on the web stating that it doesn't really work and you should use a an ATTO ExpressPCI UL4D. Is this the case? Other sites have also said that the LSI card doesn't work with Retrospect, which is a concern to me as that is my objective.
Any hints would be much appreciated!
Peter

Hi Peter
I don't know about the others but all I've used from the G5 onwards is the range of cards supplied by ATTO. It seems clear from the symptoms you describe that it just does not work and may cause a major problem to your XServe if you persist in trying to use it.
You may as well take it out and get yourself a relevant ATTO card and never mind too much about what gsx says, it has been 'wrong' before in the past.
Tony

Are Dell Poweredge 2900 servers compatible with Oracle VM?

I am seeking information on installing Oracle VM on a new model dell poweredge 2950 server. The existing hardware is pre-installed with "validated" Virtualization – VMware® ESX software 3.x.
This pre-installed "validated" Virtualization is partly installed on an SD-Card/USB device attached to the mother board. The existing white paper at DELL does not address this SD-Card/USB configuration [http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/solutions/ovm_ref_config_final.pdf?c=us&cs=04SP10&l=en&s=bsd] . I prefer a response from the Oracle VM team or Dell Employee.
Edited by: Rajendra on Oct 9, 2008 2:03 PM
Edited by: Rajendra on Oct 9, 2008 2:03 PM

I am not sure if Oracle VM server 2.1.2 will install in a Dell PE 2950 but I have installed it on a PE 1950 with no problems. After installation I turrned on VM in the bios and I have been able to install and run a couple of PVMs on it. If the 1950 and 2850 use the same motherboards then it should work for you too.
However, I have to admit to a concern with this server which may require me to reinstall the OS on it. I have a dual port qlogic HBA installed on it. "Lsmod |grep ql " indicates that the qlogic modules are installed but there are no relevant entries in /proc/scsi. If I boot up the server and use the qlogic firmware, i am able to verify that the card is installed and I am able to get the MAC addresses.
I have installed VM server on 2850's with older qlogic cards and did not encounter this sort of problem. I am not sure if this is caused by the newer qlogic card, the 1950 Motherboard, or some other factor.
Unfortunately, this server is physically located 50 miles away from me and I am unable to test out different theories. The first chance I get , I plan to install RH Linux and the usual EMC software on this server, configure it to see LUNS on the SAN then reinstall VM server on it. That should either eliminate a lot of question marks for me or give me some directions to address the issues.

Problem with Installation on DELL Poweredge with Hardware RAID 1

Hello Arch LInux community,
I am a newbee with good linux knowledge of working on linux but not much of systems administration. I am very much interested to install Arch Linux on my new desktop which is a Dell poweredge having hardware RAID 1(PERC .... controller). It has windows 7 OS on its first partition.
I saw on the controller's BIOS menu that there are 2 1tb hard drives with something like --:--:00 and --:--:01 labels. And they were partitioned into two logical volumes which are visible once I boot into Arch linux live CD as, /dev/sda (about 250GB, and has windows OS on it) and /dev/sdb (about 700GB).
Firstly, I am confused with the hard disk labels: even though they are logical partitions (i.e: combined by RAID 1, they are seen as /dev/sda and /dev/sdb). In the arch linux Beginner's wiki, there is some description on configuring for RAID, which included mdadm or mdadm_udev module specification. I did include these modules, and followed the installatin instructions carefully. I was trying to install on /dev/sdb, with the following partitioning:
Sector map of partitions on /dev/sdb : 1542848512 : 735.7 GiB
Disk identifier (GUID) : 967BF308-6E5E-43AD-AB2E-94EB975C3603
First usable sector = 34 Last usable sector = 1542848478
Total free space is 2023 sectors
Number    Start End    Size    Code Name
   34 2047       FREE
1    2048 2099199    1024.0 MiB EF00    EFI System
2    2099200 2103295    2.0 MiB EF02 BIOS boot partition
3    2103296 2615295    250.0 MiB 8300 Linux filesystem
4    2615296 212330495    100.0 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem
5    212330496 317188095 50.0 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem
6    317188096 1541924863 584.0 GiB 8300    Linux filesystem
   1541924864 1542848478       FREE
The instruction on the Beginner's wiki is somewhat difficult to understand for beginners. Especially I wasn't sure whether to make EFI System partition and BIOS boot partition or just EFI system partition. So I made both as per the instructions.
Is using UEFI compulsory, on UEFI based systems?
A little bit more sub-headings or division of instructions, in the Beginner's wiki, based on the usage scenarios can be very beneficial for newbees like me.
I am finally getting the following error when I select the Arch Linux from the GRUB menu. Why it can't find the device? I shall wait for your initial responses, and will give more specifics of my installation to find out any wrong step that I may have made.
[ 0.748399] megasas: INIT adapter done
ERROR: device 'UUID=40e603e9-7285-4ec8-8a06-a579358a52a0' not found. Skipping fsck
ERROR: Unable to find root device 'UUID=40e603e9-7285-4ec8-8a06-a579358a52a0' .
You are being dropped to a recovery shell
Type 'exit' to try and continue booting
Sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
[rootfs /]#

Well, you can see your RAID partitions and you're getting GRUB to load, and you are even being dropped to the recovery shell which means that the /boot partition is being found and is accessible. All vary, vary good things.
I would boot into the Arch live CD/USB again. Then check the UUID of the / Root partition. To do this I just check the log listing of /dev/disk/by-uuid
ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid
Hopefully the UUID for the /root partition in the /boot/grub/grub.cfg is incorrect, and all you need to do is change it from 'UUID=40e603e9-7285-4ec8-8a06-a579358a52a0' to the correct UUID.
If the UUID is correct... then maybe the correct driver module is not complied into the initramfs. You could try adding that mdadm to the MODULES= list in /etc/mkinitcpio.conf then rebuild the initramfs again.
mkinitcpio -p linux
Hum..., the whole /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.... hum, You know... Maybe you need to change the line in /boot/grub/grub.cfg
set root='hd1,msdos1'
The hd1 is the equivalent to /dev/sda and the msdos1 is the equivalent of the First Partition i.e. /dev/sda1.. (note this is my disk yours may correctly have different numbers and not be a msdos partition)... owe wait... hum, you know I am fairly sure that like is really the root disk where the /boot partition is and has no relation to the / Root partition... Someone clear that up please.... It is hard for me to recall and I have my / Root parition encrypted, so It is hard for me to make heads or tails of that one right now, but that could be the problem too i.e. try changing hd1 to hd2 or hd0 or something.
Owe, and it may be faster if you just make temporary corrections to the GRUB menu by hitting the "e" key on the menu entry you want to change then hit.. I think F10 to boot the modified entry. That way you don't need to keep booting into the Live CD/USB
Last edited by hunterthomson (2012-09-20 05:52:33)

Has anybody had an issue with System State Backups on a Dell PowerEdge R510 Server running Server 2008 R2?

Hi,
We have recently had issues running system state backups on our 2008 R2 Domain Controllers.  They are running on Dell PowerEdge R510 Physical Hardware. Whenever you initiate a system state backup, the Domain Controller becomes unresponsive
forcing us to physically reboot it.   Nothing in the Event logs or the Dell Open Management Hardware Software indicates issues with Phyiscal disks but we can always replicate the issue by starting the system state backup.
The system state backup is initialted as a batch file that runs as a scheduled task.   the commands run are as follows:
WBADMIN START SYSTEMSTATEBACKUP -backupTarget:[drive letter] -quiet
We have 4 Domain Controllers with identical disk configurations. When the DCs were setup I confirmed the system state backups were working but the issue started occuring sometime in Dec 2014. We are going to run the Dell Hardware Update Utility
to update the RAID, BIOS, Firmware updates but Has anyone experienced a similar issue that may have been triggerd by a Microsoft Patch?
Thanks,
Kevin C.
kconway@fnalgov

Hi Kevin,
This issue could be due to the Mountmgr.sys driver incorrectly maintains a global mutex. This behavior causes a deadlock situation in the Mountmgr.sys driver.
Please install the hotfix in the article below to resolve the issue:
A computer stops responding because of a deadlock situation in the Mountmgr.sys driver in running Windows 7 or in Windows Server 2008 R2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2614892
Best Regards,
Mandy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Monitoring RAID with Solaris 10 x86 and Dell PowerEdge 2650 PERC 3/Di

Hello,
I have a PowerEdge 2650 with the PERC 3/Di RAID controller.
The OS installed is Solaris 10 8/07 U4.
Currently RAID is configured through the BIOS and it works fine, but I have no way to monitor the status of the drives.
Is there a command to show me the status of the drives? Drivers I need to install?
TIA,
Chris

I'm just now starting to delve into the X86 servers, and I am not a fan of hardware RAID in general, but on the SPARC side, you would use 'raidctl' to interact with hardware RAID environments.

Solaris 8 & Dell PowerEdge 6300

This message goes to Sun Microsystem.
I work for a Small School District which is 98% Windows NT.
For more than a year I've been looking for ways to introduce a UNIX/LINUX Solution into our network.
Finally, the best opportunity arrives: We need to set up a Spam Filter for our Mail system.
The target machine is a Dell PowerEdge 6300 Dual 550mhz CPU, gig of RAM, SCSI Raid.
The School was even good enough to send me to a Solaris Admin class just to help out with the integration.
Everything is good except Device Configuration won't recognize the AMI MegaRaid Ultra SCSI contoller.
Hence the install won't find the Hard Disks.
Dell Support was good, but the couldn't help, as their testing for Solaris is a bit on the slow side.
They said SUN would have to have the final say.
So after looking through the SUN website; at all the HCLs I come to the conclusion, (note this Spam filter project must go forward soon) That:
1. It will install if there is a Driver, (Dell didn't have it, AMI didn't, I don't, perhaps SUN does?)
2. It will install if I get a different Raid Controller( unlikely as the only reason for considering UNIX in the first place is cost, and I've already got a Microsoft solution lined up for less than a good conrtoller)
3. It's not going to work, because the hardware on this Server is just not supported.
And I call SUN. Now given that SUN and all the UNIX / Linux crowd are always griping about how they are better, and how they need a piece of the Microsoft pie, and thet fact that many many times I've gotten Microsoft to help out without charge, I would've thought that SUN might be at least remotely helpful given the chance they had someone willing to start pushing them in the door, or at least they might care about Education.
But No. No way, no how. Not even maybe or anything.
Thanks a lot guys for nothing.
You assholes don't deserve a market share, and until you start either making your shit work, or at least being more helpful to those who would push your products you'll never get anywhere.
Fuck SUN Microsystems You're a bunch of good for nothing Dickwits...
KSchwantz

How is it the fault of Sun Microsystems that AMI will not provide a Solaris x86 driver for their RAID controller? Do you think Sun would not jump for joy if hardware manufacturers would provide drivers for an operating system other than Windoze whatever?
Sun is stuck in a chicken/egg situation in this case. The hardware manufacturer will not provide a driver for such a low volume product as Solaris x86, and people cannot use Solaris x86 on much current hardware due to the lack of drivers. I imagine AMI has limited resources availble for driver developement, and wants to spend its development dollars on the platform that will generate the most revenue.
Of course Sun could pay AMI to produce such a driver, or for the specifications so they could write their own, but then the price of Solaris x86 would have to be increased to offset the increased production cost. This would seem to just push people to use linux or one of the BSD variants. Any ideas on how to resolve this conundrum?
Now that I'm done ranting, maybe this info will actually help you. AFAICT, megaraid is the name of a product line, not for a specific card. If you could provide more detailed info about the specific AMI HBA that you have, someone might be able to provide more detailed info to you. Some locations that appear to have some form of AMI megaraid drivers:
http://www.driverscollection.com/?H=MegaRAID%20Drivers&By=AMI&SS=Solaris%20x86
http://support.ap.dell.com/ap/en/filelib/
http://support.megaraid.com/support/download.cfm
HTH

2.6 + DELL PowerEdge 4400 + AIC-7880 + AIC-7899 don't mix

Hi,
I have 10 DELL Poweredge 4400 servers to get Solaris 2.6 installed on asap.
They come with embedded aic-7880 for scsi cdrom and aic-7899 for raid support.
Well I can not get past the DCA diskettes to get Solaris installed. Seems to hang on the adp.bef driver. Also I think I may have an IRQ problem.
Any suggestions would be much appreciated. I know we should have bought Ultra II systems!!!
Best regards,
Christopher

Please see my post under the question about using Solaris 7 drivers under 2.6. Patch 107768-02 addresses this and has an image for a driver diskette so you can apply it during the DCA to allow the install. All covered in the readme.

Problems installing Solaris 10 on Dell PowerEdge 800

Hi,
I am experiencing some trouble when I attempt to install Solaris 10 on a Dell PowerEdge 800. It is equipped with two RAID disks controlled by a Dell CERC SATA 1.5/6ch (according to the BIOS).
The installation program reports that it cannot write to the disk. This happens when it is about to start installing files. Tried setting it to a single volume and disable RAID. Same thing. Read another article saying something about disabling IDE, well it doesn't seem to help ...
Any hints?

I have the same problem on a dell 750 with the SERC controller. I can add some more information but if you get a solution I would appreciate the detail.
1) If I install Solaris via the SERC in RAID 1 mode then the alarm on the SERC goes off as soon as I start to write to the disk.
2) I bypassed the SERC and installed on a single disk straight off the motherboard. Time the install crashed at the same point but this time the error message told me that the first available cylinder was number 3! Ah
3) I reconnected the disk via the SERC, rebuilt the RAID array and made a mistake. I created a RAID 0 (striped) array and installed the software starting from cylinder 3. I got a complete solaris install that rebooted fine and is fully working.
BUT I NEED A MIRRORED SYSTEM SO
4) I rebuild the machine again this time RAID 1 and again the crash occured at exactly the same point i.e. as soo as I start to write to the disk.
Whether or not DELL / Adaptec support Solaris should not be an issue. This is a BIOS configurable RAID controller that can be fully serviced (e.g. disks replaced) from the BIOS. The system sees the array as a disk via the controller and indeed it is seeing it.
The SERCs own data configuration data should be on sectors which are not visible to solaris VIA the SERC so we shouldnt be able to damage them but I suspect that this may not be the case.
I suspect that the answer is in the partition layout and who or what creates them (I dont mean the Solaris slices but the FDISK partitions)
To make matters worse, since I need the machine working I went back to disks straight of the motherboard and configured again and used metadevices to set up a fully mirrored systemas I have done many times before on sparc (but never on Solaris x86)
This worked fine but I thought that I would test bootability in the event of disk failure. There isnt any!
if disk 1 fails then the motherboard wont accept disk 2 unless you swap the cables and move it do disk 1 and by then the boot sectors are wrong for the address of the device. I can probably solve this by building both disks in slot one but who wants a mirrored server that you have to open up and move a cable when the disk fails. I think I may have to ditch SATA and go back to SCSI !

Dell Poweredge 2800 Solaris?

Hi,
I have a Dell PowerEdge 2800 server. It has three 73Gig SCSI diska and three 146 Gig SCSI disks.
This system comes with LSI 53c1030 controllers. The drives are hot plug and the dell backplane has a device that appears on the SCSI bus PE/PV 1 x8 SCSI bp.
This machine hangs in configuring devices Solaris 10 GA.
In solaris 9 it sort of works with the Driver from LSI but the I/O rate is limited to 8 Megabytes/ Second (if your lucky, normally running at 1 meg/second). The file systems on the diska have been corrupted three times in 1 day. The messages file has a repeated error message
ID 3658 kern.info <Default cyl 8921 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>
The verify disks in the controller bios takes around 100 minutes for the 73 gig scsi and says its complete at 86%!
Has anybody got any idea how to get this box working?
Please Help!

OK guys,
I've got it rocking. thanks to the new itmpt driver released by LSIlogic a couple of days ago for download on their site.
these are the exact steps, how to install Solaris 10 x86 (03/05 release) on a Dell 1850 Dual Xeon 3Ghz, with 2x73GB SCSI disks, using an LSI 1030 controller.
1. go into the bios in the Dell, and disable the Raid mode, this is done in the Integrated Peripherals, just set the raid card to SCSI enabled. Also, make sure the boot device has the diskette above the hard drive or CD.
2. download yourself the 119376-01 SD.ITU from sun.
3. make yourself a DCA diskette (you can get the file called d1_image from the DVD, which you can mount on another pc)
4. mount that DCA diskette on some linux box, or wincrap box, it is a DOS formatted diskette, and edit the file [solaris/bootenv.rc] file and add a line at the bottom with the following:
setprop acpi-user-options 0x4
5. boot the machine with the DCA diskette, and the DVD in the drive (make sure the diskette is booting), and then F4 to add a driver, and add the SD.ITU diskette. Then continue as always (F2....)
6. When asked what boot option, choose Interactive installation text in CONSOLE MODE (option 4) (believe me, you will need this due to a bug in the graphical install)
7. continue with the full install, you will notice that even though the e1000g0 is "skipped" on the test, it actually recognizes that you are networked, weird.
8. at the end of the full install it will ask you to add the SD_11... diskette again, so do that, and press enter. If at this point it complains that it cannot find the sd driver in the diskette, then press enter again, and it will find it (this may or may not occur randomly).
9. the box will reboot, and the bootup will take a long while doing some SMF stuff (i.e. how to hide inetd so that noone can telnet in any longer hahhaa). During this process, go to the lsilogic.com site, and download yourself the following file: itmpt-x86-5.06.00.zip
10. unzip that file, and you will notice that it contains itmpt-x86-50600-itu.dd and also itmpt-x86-50600.tar.Z
the itmpt-x86-50600-itu.dd is an ITU, but it only contains a solaris 9 version of the thing, so it wont be useful at boot time. Ergo, we will use the package file itmpt-x86-50600.tar.Z
11. Now that you are networked, copy that itmpt-x86-50600.tar.Z file into your dell, and uncompress untar it. Then change into the install folder it creates, and just type pkgadd -d . Go ahead and install the thing.
12. not it is important that you make sure you do exactly as the installpkg tells you. You need to vi /etc/driver_aliases and comment out the mpt "pci1000,30" and mpt "pci1000,50" lines (i.e. add a # as the first char of the line).
and UNCOMMENT the ones you will see at the bottom, called itmpt "pci1000,30" and itmpt "pci1000,50"
in my case the itmpt "pci1000,54" is already uncommented, leave as is.
13. touch /reconfigure
14. reboot
15. PTG.
The key end effect that was desired:
- I now get 50-100 megabytes / sec sending data from disk to disk, which is paaaarfect !.
- Hyperthreading is recognized properly, I can now see 4 cpus,
- The 8GB of swap I have is recognized.
In response to Solaris being junk, and moving to Linux or BSD, well, this is not an OS-War thread, but I can guarantee the following premises are true:
a. the easier to install an OS, the more latent incompatibilities are added to a running system, which invariably manifest themselves at 4 AM, or when you least expect them.
b. wincrap is not and OS, it's just a bad, sad joke on humanity.
c. BSD will invariably freeze your whole operation as soon as you have 10 heavy applications accessing the disks heavily for more than a minute.
d. Linux will invariably need a reboot once in a while, specially when you run more than 5 different heavy apps with lots of ram manipulation, and disk action. (note, if using heavy NFS, then the reboot will be needed once a week or less)
e. Solaris (sparc or X86) is the only one that allows me to sleep and smile (once it's installed of course), and will not freeze no matter what you throw at it, I have a dual cpu x86 at constant load 3 or 4, doing webserver, database, php runner, and batch image processing, with an uptime of 1200 days.
cheers to all, wish you luck.

Solaris 8 installation problem on Dell PowerEdge 500SC

Hi,
I am having TWO PROBLEMS installing Solaris 8 on Dell PowerEdge 500SC.
This hardware spec is:
Pentium-III at 1GHz
256MB 133MHz ECC SDRAM
20GB 7200RPM ATA100 EIDE hard drive (on integrated ATA-100 controller)
48X EIDE CD-ROM drive (on integrated ATA-100 controller)
Motherboard: unknown
more details: http://www.dell.com/us/en/esg/topics/esg_pedge_sc_towermain_servers_3_pedge_500sc.htm
FIRST PROBLEM is the following message was shown at the hardware probe.
WARNING: ACPI Tables not in Reclaim Memory
Warning: Resource Conflict - both devices are added
NON-ACPI device: PNP0C01
Port: C00-C01, C06-C08, C14, C50-C52, C6C-C6F,
CD6-CD7
F50-F57
ACPI device: PNP0C01
Port 814-85B, 580-58F, C00-CD7, F50-F58
At this time, I was using "Solaris 8 (Intel Platform Edition) 10/01" released version.
I am not sure what this means, but it was RESOLVED with using newer "x86 DCA boot diskette (Patch-ID# 110930-05)".
But, the SECOND REAL PROBLEM is another one. It just happens booting the kernel after the hardware probe. I get the following messages about 2 minutes later, after beginning to load kernel.
WARNING:/pci@0,0/pci-ide@1/ata@1 (ata1): timeout: abort request, target=0 lun=0
WARNING:/pci@0,0/pci-ide@1/ata@1 (ata1): timeout: about device, target=0 lun=0
WARNING:/pci@0,0/pci-ide@1/ata@1 (ata1): timeout: reset target, target=0 lun=0
WARNING:/pci@0,0/pci-ide@1/ata@1 (ata1): timeout: reset bus, target=0 lun=0
After another 1 or 2 minutes I get more error and the system reboots.
Please give me any suggestion or advice!
Thanks.
Kazuyoshi

I've been having the exact same problems on a PowerEdge 500SC. I have managed to get Solaris up and running on the machine, however. I booted the DCA from the floppy disk and installed from the CD-ROM. When the DCA is ready to scan for devices I use the "Specific Scan" option to tell it to look for specific devices. I tell it to scan for all devices in the listing and in doing so the DCA finds ISA-based IDE controllers. After it provides a listing of the devices it found I use the "Device Tasks" option and the "View/Edit Devices" menu item then delete the Bus Mastering IDE controller device. Once the screen comes up to ask for a boot device, the drives will show up as on the ISA controllers.
I have to go through this process every time I boot the machine but I am able to make the system run at least.
I haven't figured out the ACPI problem, yet.
Regards,
Doug

Oracle 8.1.7 on Red Hat Linux on a Dell Poweredge

We have a Dell PowerEdge 6400 server with PERC 2/DC raid
controllers.
We have installed Red Hat Linux 6.2.
According to the installation guide in order to install Oracle
8.1.7 we need to recompile the Kernal to get to version 2.2.19-
6.2.7.
Recompiling the Kernal causes a failure in the Raid controllers.
I realise that this isn't strictly Oracle but I wondered if
anyone had met this problem before. It appears virtually
impossible to configure this combination to support Oracle.

Yes there is a lot of information out there. Oracle 8.1.6,
8.1.7, 9 on Linux 6, 7, 9.
Which glibc? binutils? compat-libs?
For 8.1.7 on Redhat 9
Please try: http://www3.sympatico.ca/arothmel/oracle/817.html
Still evolving. Feedback welcome :)

Odd netowrking issues on 2 Dell PowerEdge servers

Hi, we have recently installed two Dell PowerEdge servers both set-up with Windows Server 2008 R2. I used the Dell Systems Management disk to install the OS which pre-loads certain drivers, etc.
Since the install I have been trying to track down and fix some very strange behaviour with both servers, in particular with MS Exchange 2007 and IIS.
The issues on server 1 (file server) are no access to Windows Updates (0x80072EE2), certain users on other VPN sites having problems accessing certain areas of our Intranet that require authentication, odd problems using IE on the server - for example
I can go to Google, carry out a search but when I click on a result it just sits there waiting for Google. There are no issues with users on the same site, and there are no issues accessing the server shares from any site.
The issues on server 2 (Exchange server) are even more odd and have me rapidly pulling out my hair. With the site we can send and receive between this server and an old Exchange 2003 server with no problems, Public Folder replication from the old server
to the new is occurring with no problems and we can send messages with large attachments both to external users and users on other sites. However when we start looking at incoming connections this is where it gets odd. Incoming external messages over 4Mb are
delayed and eventually bounced - our provider says that they are getting timeouts. Incoming messages with attachments from two other internal Exchange 2007 sites are getting delayed and from one sites are not getting through at all. Messages without attachments
are not getting through at all. In the Exchange logs I am seeing Connection Timeout and Connection Dropped messages.
I am very sure that the problem is not with message size as all parameter relating to message size are set to 100Mb. I know it is not a firewall issue as redirecting incoming external messages to the old Exchange server is fine.
To my mind this looks like there is something on these servers which is messing with http/https/smtp when communicating outside the local subnet. I have checked for viruses and mal-ware and for testing purposes disabled AV and firewall but this makes no
difference.
I have two other PowerEdge server on another site with similar configurations which have been working fine for 18 months. The only big difference I can see between the servers is that these two are the only one where I used the Dell Systems Management disk
to install the OS. I have Googled 80072EE2 and it does appear that other have seen the same problem and their way to resolve it was to wipe and reinstall directly from the Microsoft disk and no use the Dell Systems Management Disk.
However, this is not an option here as these servers are both in a live environment (I know, should have made sure everything was running properly before going live, but these had to be put in place rapidly to replace failing servers).
From what I can see of the servers it does appear that somewhere along the line Dell have used files which are causing some networking issues on these two servers - can anyone advise me if there is a reasonably straight-forward way to remove the network
components form the servers and then reinstate from the Microsoft disk?
I have tried the fixed relating to Windows Update from the suggestion offered searching for 80072EE2.
I have tried installing the latest Dell drivers for the network adaptor, and also the latest Broadcom ones.
I have tried switching off various Offload settings on the NIC as suggested by other although that was more relating to Hyper-V issues.
Anything else I should be looking at, or can anyone tell me what else to look for on the servers?
Many thanks, Eddie

Hi Eddie,
Based on your description, we have many different problems in two servers as below,
In the file server.
-> The issues on server 1 (file server) are no access to Windows Updates (0x80072EE2).
-> odd problems using IE on the server - for example I can go to Google, carry out a search but when I click on a result it just sits there waiting for Google.
I noticed that you mentioned that you have tried the fixed relating to Windows Update. Have we solved this issue? And another issue, IE could access Google but can’t access
the links in search result. It seems that this issues are related to name resolution. To verify if the name resolution works fine. Please ping the DNS server at first. If we can ping DNS server, we can also ping
www.google.com and other domain names to verify the function of name resolution. Please try to use ipconfig /flushdns and ipconfig /registerdns command in server 1. And the DNS port(53) was opened. After this, if the problem
still exist, please involve the administrator of DNS server to help verify if the domain name resolution has some problems.
-> certain users on other VPN sites having problems accessing certain areas of our Intranet that require authentication
I’m a little unclear about this part. If the VPN connection has set up successful, it is possible that the user need be authenticate when the user access some resource of the
Intranet. So what is the certain areas and what prompt we received.
In the Exchange server.
->Incoming external messages over 4Mb are delayed and eventually bounced - our provider says that they are getting timeouts. Incoming messages with
attachments from two other internal Exchange 2007 sites are getting delayed and from one sites are not getting through at all. Messages without attachments are not getting through at all. In the Exchange logs I am seeing Connection Timeout and Connection Dropped
messages.
-> I am very sure that the problem is not with message size as all parameter relating to message size are set to 100Mb.
We can send messages but we can’t receive messages, it was delayed or it can’t get through. And I notice that you mentioned that the message size is
not the problem. To verify if the network have problems about the size messages. We can also download a file whose size is over 5Mb from the Internet. If we can download the file, maybe it’s not the network problems.
-> I know it is not a firewall issue as redirecting incoming external messages to the old Exchange server is fine.
Maybe we could also turn off the firewall temporarily to see if the firewall block some connection.
-> To my mind this looks like there is something on these servers which is messing with http/https/smtp when communicating outside the local subnet.
If we think the http/https/smtp are related to this issues, maybe we could check if all ports about this service was opened.
And due to server 2 is an Exchange server, there might be some wrong with the Exchange services. We have the related Exchange forum with professional
to deal with this issue. If there are still some problems with Exchange server, maybe we can try to create a new thread about Exchange.
Best Regards,
Tina

Dell PowerEdge SC1420 with Ultra 320 scsi dirves

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for