Dell SP2309W Display on Core Solo Mini?

Hi, I'm thinking of buying the new Dell SP2309W display which looks excellent value but I'm not sure if it will work with the mini. The specification states that it is "Full HD 2048 x 1152" which I realise is greater than the 1920 x 1200 stated as the maximum supported by the mini.
My question is what will happen if I connect it by DVI? Will it scale the output to fit the screen?
Sorry if this is a dumb question but I used to know how things worked in the days of CRTs!
Thanks,
Barry

+I'm thinking of buying the new Dell SP2309W display which looks excellent value but I'm not sure if it will work with the mini. The specification states that it is "Full HD 2048 x 1152" which I realise is greater than the 1920 x 1200 stated as the maximum supported by the mini.+
+My question is what will happen if I connect it by DVI? Will it scale the output to fit the screen?+
If it works at all, I doubt you will be happy with the results. LCD monitors look best when run at their full native resolution. The Mini's DVI can't drive this resolution on that monitor. At best it would "pixel-double" and run the monitor at 1024x576.
Looking at the Dell site, it isn't clear whether this monitor requires a dual-link display card to get that 2048 x 1152 resolution. Typically that would be the case. But regardless the Mini's DVI can't drive that resolution. It is possible that the Mini's VGA might be able to drive that high -- since it goes a bit farther than the DVI resolution. But I'd have to look it up.

Similar Messages

Intel Core Solo mini to icloud?

I have an old intel core solo mini that I just recently upgraded to snow leopard. I am confused and lost on what will happen if I sit idle on this icloud thing. I don't have an iphone or need to sync anything, but I do use my .me email account and have a website thru iweb.
Can anyone tell me what I will lose when the final move comes down for icloud? Is iweb still safe and secure? What all is attached to my .me account anyway? I COULD do without that email account and begin a migration to another email resource. I really don't want to have to put a lot of money into upgrading this mini if it's simply securing an email account/calendar/etc. Like I said I don't need any syncing resources at this time. I just spent $130 on the box set for snowleopard 6 months ago.
help!
Annie

I forgot I use iphoto as well. I guess I'm just confused on what I will be able to do on this computer without icloud. If I got a new computer with icloud, I'm supposing I can migrate all my data over. Realize I've had this one computer since 2006 without a single problem! I'd hoped to have it forever!!!
Is there anyway to upgrade this old thing or am I looking at buying a newer version?
I have several windows laptops, but I'm assuming I can't access iweb and iphoto from them.
Sorry if I sound ignorant, I guess I am when it comes to all this!
Thanks in advance!

ISight with Core Solo Mini

Hello,
I wonder if someone knows the answer to this. My mother is in L.A. and I am in New York, and I want to get her a Mac mini Core Solo and an iSight camera so she can talk to me and my family (her grand kids). Would a base model Core Solo be able to handle the iSight camera? We're talking about straightforward one-on-one video conferencing between what would her Mac mini and my iMac. She already has an older monitor, USB keyboard and mouse, so the price point of a Core Solo and iSight camera is just perfect. iSight with iChat are the most processor intensive apps she'll be using on the computer. Has anyone tried it with a Core Solo?
iMac Core Dup 17" Mac OS X (10.4.7)

As you'll see at the bottom of this page, even a G3 can initiate a 1-to-1 video conference. A Core Solo is much more powerful than any G3, and iChat is Universal (no Rosetta emulation), so a Core Solo is more than what you need (you could even consider a 4-way chat .
If you have Cable or DSL internet then you must have at least 100 Kbps downstream (probably more), but you have to make sure that you have at least 100 Kbps upstream if you want good image & sound.

Final Cut Express-can it be run on a Core Solo mini?

Could Final Cut Express 4 be installed and used on a Core Solo Mac mini?

Yes, if it meets the minimum requirements laid out on the FCE web page. There will be some loss of functionality because of the lack of graphics card.

System hanging in AM intel core solo mini

Okay, I've been a mac user for a zillion years, but this is new.
When I come in in the morning I have the login screen, but when I try to enter my password, the cursor turns to the wait icon, and spins and spins.
I have to shutdown to get back to normal.
Any thoughts? I do have bootcamp on this machine, but up and running in osx.

I'm a complete Mac nubie and I'm running into the same problem with a Mini core duo. If I leave it at a login screen for an extended period of time I either...
1) Have no response to keyboard or mouse. I have found that if I suspend the unit by holding the power button momentarily I can log in after I resume.
2) I have mouse response and after clicking on my user account the "busy" color wheel just spins indefinitely. From there I have to do a hard reset.
The Mini is pretty much just out of the box and I'm using a wireless keyboard and mouse combo.
Mac Mini Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Mac Mini - Core Solo - Won't See Any Wireless network

I have a Mac Mini, first gen Intel, Core Solo, that won't see any wireless networks. However, it will see my extreme basestation, and my two airport express devices over bonjour, which makes me think that the wireless device is working.
I've reset the PMU, with no luck.
Any suggestions?

Does an Airport card show in the system profiler?
Is Airport switched on in your mini - the Airport icon in the menu bar should show at least grey bars rather than an empty white 'fan' shape?
With Airport on, when you click on the Airport icon, does it show any network?
If you click on 'Join Other Network' and type the name of the wifi network you run, what error message does the system give?
How far away from the wifi base station is the mini? What kind of structures and environment is it in?
If you move the mini to be in close proximity to the wifi base station, does it show any signal?
When you download a copy of AP Grapher (http://www.chimoosoft.com/apgrapher.html) and run it, what does it show for signals, noise etc?
How is the mini seeing any wifi devices via Bonjour - do you have it wired into your network? If so, the fact that the devices appear via bonjour doesn't mean they are transmitting wifi, nor that they are in range.
By the way, the Core Solo mini doesn't have a PMU to reset. If you used the PMU reset procedure it won't have helped, and may actually have caused problems. The correct procedure for an Intel-based mini is an SMC reset, as follows:
-From the Apple menu, choose Shut Down (or if the computer is not responding, hold the power button until it turns off).
-Unplug all cables from the computer, including the power cord and any display cables.
-Wait at least 15 seconds.
-Plug the power cord back in, *making sure the power button is not being pressed* at the time.
-Then reconnect your keyboard and mouse to the computer.
-Press the power button on the back to start up your computer.

Intel Mac Mini Core Solo - Kernel Panic on Boot

I was wondering if anyone who has purchased the Intel Mac Mini is having issues with Kernel Panics during the booting sequence?
I got a Core Solo from the local Apple store (couldn't wait to play, I'm waiting on the Core Duo I ordered online to come still ). The first thing I did was fire it up check it out for a few minutes, then I put the install disc in and reinstalled a clean OS, with less options because I'm planning on hooking it up to my TV so I don't need space hogs like Garageband etc on my TV computer. I got the updates that popped up, then shutdown the computer. I took it out to the living room and hooked it up to the tv and I got a black message about needing to restart (a kernel panic) right when the blue progress loading bar comes up on boot. I spent a while with it trying to figure out what was wrong, ran the Apple Hardware Test, booted it fine in Safe Boot. Finally I got tired of it and reinstalled the OS again.
It was fine for a day, working fine out on the tv. I brought it back in my room to play with a few things like Darwine, etc. Shut it down, came back an hour or so later booted it up and got the kernel panic on boot. Safe boot still worked fine. I spent some time trying to look for panic logs but didn't see any. I ran the disk utility and did a Full erase and it worked fine. I reinstalled the OS again. Ran MemTestOSX and it worked fine. I left it running the Apple Hardware Test for about 6 hours or more, and it performed perfectly.
This morning it still seemed ok, except sometimes on a cold boot when the blue progress bar screen should come on... my monitor just shows black and the light on the monitor goes inactive. So, I press the button on the back to sleep it, then bring it out of sleep with the keyboard and the OS is sitting there booted.
It seems like a weird combination of software and hardware problems, but maybe it's all hardware problems. I can't get past Safe Boot working when the OS stops loading. Right now the computer is working fine.
I'm waiting for my Core Duo to come in the mail and verify that it works flawlessly, then I'll take the Solo to the store and ask them to look at it.
Anyone have any similar experiences so far?

It seems like the mini is doing alright so far. I think maybe the full erase solved whatever issue it was having. I also got my Core Duo Mini yesterday in the mail and it's performing like a champ. Definitely a nice machine.
I'll close my question for now, since the Core Solo Mini seems alright. But, as a warning don't get on Front Row's bad side. I tried force quitting it because it was taking too long to load the videos folder and then tried shutting down from a terminal and ended up having to turn the machine off.

Mac mini Core Solo is a great deal slower then 1.5ghz mac mini G4??

I have two mac minis, one has a 1.5 Ghz G4 and the other has a 1.5 Ghz Core Solo. Both have 512mb of RAM and OS X 10.4.7. I have the same software installed between them. They both have the latest updates for Office 2004 installed, both have the latest system updates, latest Firefox updates, both have latest Adobe Reader updates, and both have Quark 6.5 installed.
The Core Solo mac mini is WAY slower then the G4, Entourage in particular is almost slow to the point it is unworkable. Is this due to the Rosetta emulation? What can I do to improve this, will increasing the ram to 1 GB clear these speed issues or am I going to have to return this mini and get one with a Core Duo?
The current sluggishness on the Core Solo mini is unbearable, literally my Powerbook G4 667mhz with 768mb of ram is loads faster then this mini is. I'm thinking more RAM will do the trick, but wanted to bounce this off of some other experts here first. Thanks.

Entourage in particular is almost slow to the point it is unworkable. Is this due to the Rosetta emulation?
Yes, almost certainly. Microsoft Office is not yet Intel-native, so it's gonig to run more slowly than a native edition would. The same will apply to any PowerPC-only software.
What can I do to improve this, will increasing the ram to 1 GB clear these speed issues
I can't say for certain, but other users have reported that increasing the RAM to 1GB (or beyond) has made significant improvements in performance.

Anyone running Parallels on Mini Core Solo?

I've seen widely varying reports (but only a few, not enough to come to a conclusion) about how well (i.e. acceptable speed, or too slow?) the Parallels Desktop virtualization software (which allows running Windows alongside Mac OS X, rather like Virtual PC used to do) runs on the Core Solo Intel Mac mini, which is the only Intel Mac without the Core Duo CPU.
We need to get a Mini for the office, to run QuickBooks (only, no games or anything else); the Core Solo is within budget, the Duo model is beyond it, and more than we need otherwise.
Anyone here tried running Parallels on a Core Solo Mini? Care to share your experience?
Andrew Main

I’ve installed Parallels Desktop and WinXP on my Core Solo with 1GB RAM. I also have a MacBook so I have compared the two.
The Good News:
The speed of Windows in Parallels is what you’d expect from a basic Celeron PC with integrated video from a couple years ago. In other words, if you will be using programs with modest requirements such as word processing, spreadsheet, or database with medium data sets you’ll be fine. Anything that requires graphics acceleration...forget it. Screen redraws are slow because they are done through the Mac. I don’t mean you can watch each pixel be written but you can watch the screen redraw.
I have two tasks that require a PC - one is accessing a .NET based website that only works in WindowsXP and Exploder 6. The day that company has a viable competitor that doesn’t require Exploder we jump. The second is a data mining program. My mini and Parallels Desktop handle this just fine.
The Bad News:
Installing WinXP was something of a challenge and it was only through Parallel’s fantastic forum and tech support that I finally succeeded. But remember - I was on the cutting edge at the time working with a beta product. Parallels ships with a disk image program. I’ve found that it is best to make a disk image of the installation CD rather than use the CD itself. This applies to all CDs.
I also found it impossible to update to WinXP SP2 - my computer always hung during the process. (That may have been a glitch with early beta releases, I don’t know.) Luckily at work we had a WinXP w/ SP2 install CD - and commercial license - that installed without a hitch. But be warned - installing WinXP on a core solo with Parallels is slow. Start in the morning and keep an eye on the screen as it progresses - and don’t expect to use the computer for anything else. The installation will be using 95-99% of the CPU.
BootCamp vs Parallels:
In a word, significant. I’ve not done any benchmarking but when you run WinXP natively you realize just how much horsepower Parallels and OS X is taking away from Windows. Not to mention how much faster the screen redraws.
Differences between Core Solo and Duo:
Night and Day. It is like the difference between running Windows with an older Celeron and a new Pentium (excluding screen redraws which are slow because they are done via the Mac’s graphics package rather than accessing video directly.) On the mini, when I am processing data with the data mining program I can’t use the mini for anything else. Running the same process on my MacBook I can surf, read email, play a couple rounds of Soduko, whatever.
Conclusions:
If your budget is for a core solo consider using BootCamp rather than Parallels. The speed difference isn’t as significant as between solo and duo but it is significant. The Intel Macs boot quickly enough that your downtime isn’t tremendous. Having said that, in my own circumstances I find the speed of Parallels on my mini to be sufficient that I chose it rather than BootCamp. You might also want to consider a refurbished rather than a new core duo. Hope this helps.

Core Solo?

Can iWork and Pages run well on my Core Solo Mini? Can it even run at all? I was just wondering because school is starting soon and I need a good word processor to type essays and reports. I was also wondering, would TextEdit that came withmy Mac work? Does everything come out normal if it is printed? I still need to get a printer too so I can't try it out yet.

From the iWork '06 system requirements:
iWork ’06 requires Mac OS X version 10.3.9 or v10.4.3 or later, a Macintosh computer with a 500 MHz or faster PowerPC G4, PowerPC G5 or Intel Core processor, 256 MB of RAM (512MB recommended), 32MB of video RAM, QuickTime 7.0.3 or later, and a DVD drive required for install.
It doesn't say a Core Duo is required, so it would appear your Mac mini meets the requirements.
TextEdit is much more basic, but is capable of more than it first appears. As for printing, I get just what I expect from Pages. If you come across any problems, post back. Some times problems are related to a specific printer & just making sure you have the most recent driver will fix it.

Planning on the core solo

hey how good is the core solo mini? i need to get my family a new one. there using my imac g5 and having to clean the mighty mouse every three days is annoying. i also dont trust there carlisness on how they treat it. dont say just tell them to be more careful cauz i have. so is the core solo like the g4? that would be great to let me know. i have all the other stuff. just need the mini. the mini would be used for web surfing and light word processing

so is faster or as fast as the g4?
I have two G4 minis, an original 1.25 model and a later 1.5. I have also installed a small number of Core Solos and Duos for users, and had a Core Solo to play with for a couple of weeks recently when the user complained it was faulty (it wasn't) and had the chance to compare it directly with the 1.25 G4. The Core Solo was noticeably faster on native software, far less so when running applications in Rosetta, though in that instance it depended somewhat on the application - MS Word for instance seemed more responsive on the Core Solo, while Photoshop seemed about the same.
All in all, it seemed a good system - plenty powerful enough for some heavy use, which isn't entirely surprising since there are still a lot of old (much slower) G4 systems around doing complex publishing, design, digital editing work and despite it's size, the Core Solo is more powerful than those systems.
Critically, for apps that are non-native and thus require Rosetta, the more memory the better. Indeed that's typically true for any mac running anything. Thus I'd recommend 1Gb to those who hope to use older software, where 512Mb might be sufficient for native versions.

10.6.8 Wifi Mac Mini Core Solo Problems

Hi All,
I have had my beloved Mac Mini core solo (1.5ghz) since 2007 and have had regular upgrades to keep it alive (upgraded hard drive, ram etc.).
A couple of days ago I upgraded the airport card - it previously was only 802.11 a/b/g, but I now have the atheros 9280 802.11 a/b/g/n successfully installed into the machine.
The main reason for doing this is that my previous airport card just never seemed to work at all; I have an iphone and ipad and they both successfully connect to my Orange livebox router with no problems whatsoever, yet my Mac Mini did not connect at all having tried everything I can. Therefore my final solution was to arrange an update of the airport card to the new atheros one suggested by my local Apple dealer.
I brought the Mac home, and tried to attahc to my wifi router to immediate success. It had full signal strength and was working flawlessly. I then turned the machine off, went out for a while and then came home to find it was not working again and kept searching for the wifi router and asking for constant passwords. After a long time, it seemed to work again but after I turned the machine off it lost the settings (depsite me asking network settings to save via the locked button) and I am constantly repeating this process.
I am therefore wondering if anyone can help. The atheros 9280 airport card information is as follows (from the system profiler):
Software Versions:
Menu Extra: 6.2.2 (622.2)
configd plugin: 6.2.5 (625.6)
System profiler: 6.0.1 (601.1)
Network preference: 6.2.2 (622.2)
Aiport Utility: 5.5.3 (553.20)
IO80211 Family: 4.0 (400.40)
Card Type: Airport Extreme (0x168C, 0x8F)
Firmware version: Atheros 9280: 2.1.14.6
Locale: FCC
Country Code: DE
Supported PHY Modes: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Supported Channels: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,36,40,44,48,52,56,60,64,100,104,108,112,116,120,1 24,128,132,136,140
Wake on Wireless: Supported
Status: Network Service Inactive
Just to also add that its Snow Leopard 10.6.8, Intel Mac Mini core 1.5ghz solo, and my Orange Wifi router is quite old (around 2006) so supports a/b/g - I was thinking that this may be the fault but why would all my other apple systems have no problems with this connection?
Any help would be really appreciated as I'm going a little nuts here!
fdsbh

Really? I thought Sno was supposed to be more efficient?
I'd say that SL is more efficient on a machine it was made to run on. Apple didn't exclude the single core Intel processor, probably because they didn't have to change their code like they would have for a PPC processor but part of the efficiency is it's ability to split services to the separate cores in the CPU. You only have one, so that part of the improvement is of no use. All of the processes the OS handles and splits to multiple CPU cores are worthless and your programs will just have to wait until the CPU has time for you.
Meanwhile, the programs you are running are more powerful and provide higher quality and really need the extra core. The speed of the ram, the buss, and the hard drive are not as fast as your MacBook either. All of this data has to be moved around quite a bit from the drive to ram and then back to the drive.
Christmas is coming
WinXP will run on a 600Mhz PII processor with 128MB's of PC100 ram, but you wouldn't want to. It's not a lot of fun to work with or work on.
Unless there is some whiz bang program or technology that you need from SL, I'd take the machine back to Leopard or even Tiger, which it probably ran pretty well.

Switching between Dell 4K display and Apple Mini DisplayPort To Dual-Link DVI Adapter

Hi All,
I've recently upgraded my home setup to a Dell 4K display (Dell P2815Q), which since the 10.9.3 update work as expected.
However the downside is that my office setup uses a Mini displayport to Dual-Link DVI adapter (Firmware version 1.03) and a Dell 30" display (2560x1600), which will not work without a reboot after using the 4K display. If I use the 4K display after using the Dual-Link DVI adapter it works fine.
Is this a know issue ? If not, I'm happy to provide some more diagnostic information to help resolve the issue.

http://www.everymac.com/ says:
*This model supports a simultaneous maximum resolution up to 2560x1600 on two external displays via Thunderbolt. Alternately, it can support a single display up to 2560x1600 via Thunderbolt and a single 1080p display at up to 60 Hz, 3840x2160 at 30 Hz, or 4096x2160 at 24 Hz via HDMI.
DVI is not mentioned at all. You probably need to connect to the display via HDMI to get the 4096x2160 resolution.

What is the correct cable for iMac 11,2 Intel core i3, mini dvi to vga or mini display port to vga?

What is the correct cable for iMac 11,2 Intel core i3, mini DVI to VGA or mini display port to VGA to hook up to projector? Thanks!

mini-DisplayPort.
Regards.

Apple Wireless Keyboard on Mac Mini Core Solo CANNOT be found !

Hi,
My Apple Wireless Keyboard (non-aluminum)was working perfectly with my Mac Mini core Solo. I had to change the battery and after that I cannot connect to my Mac Mini.
I tried:
1. Update the Bluetooth software (from the downloads from Apple.com).
2. Remove all the keyboard definitions in the System Preferences, Bluetooth.
3. When I try to connect by selecting Keyboard in the Bluetooth Assistant, I won't get any device.
4. When I try to connect to any device in the Bluetooth Assistent, I'll see the only Apple Wireless Keyboard I have, but then pairing failes.
5. Only by using a USB keyboard I could enter my MacMini.
Questions:
a. How all of a sudden this can't work ?
b. How to I "reset" the keyboard ?
c. What can I do ?
Thanks in advance.
Rokesh

i am having this exact same problem. Keyboard isnt seen if I select "Keyboard" in the bluetooth setup assistant, but if I select "Any Device" then after a moment "Apple Wireless Keyboard" shows up in the device list but it will refuse to pair, saying it doesnt have any configurable services.
Any tips or help would be greatly appreciated.

Dell SP2309W Display on Core Solo Mini?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for