Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW and Radeon 9600?

Power Mac G5, Machine Model: PowerMac7,2, ATI Radeon 9600 Pro, 10.4.4.
Will this machine, with this card drive the Dell 24" monitor? Thanks for your help.

Yes.
http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9600/radeon9600prome/specs.html

Similar Messages

  • MSI KT6 Delta LSR and Radeon 9600 XT 256mb x8 AGP Problem

    hi,
        Ive just brought a Radeon 9600 XT 256mb and it wont run at x8 agp at all, games lockup as soon as i start them, within 5 mins all text on display corrupts and i get a message saying the gpu recover has set the gpu to default settings.
    I cant change anything in BIOS to set it to x4 agp as its not selectable and says AUTO only for agp speed setting.
    Only way to alter is goto smartgart in ATI drivers and select x 4 agp if u get in before text corrupts :(
    Ive managed to get it stable at x4 agp now through smartgart.
    BUT it says on box and in manual this motherboard supports agp x8 but why dont it run it ???
    i havent a clue whats up with it.

    hi,
        Ive got it running stable in x4 agp and found a post on ATI website about some motherboards not working proberly at x8 agp with Radeon 9600 series graphics cards.
    http://mirror.ati.com/support/infobase/4219.html
    Got nice scores in 3dmark 2001 and 3dmark 2003
    But what confuses me is Quake 3 demo that didnt change at all over my old card and radeon 9000 pro i tried once too.
    I got
    174fps with Radeon 9100
    175fps with Radeon 9000 pro
    173fps with Radeon 9600 XT 256mb
    Thats on Athlon xp 1700
    strange or what ?
    oh well its a old demo anyway but main thing is big increase in 3dmark 2001 by over 2000 marks

  • 4-Port IOGear KVM (DVI, USB) and Radeon 9600 Pro (dual G5) Problem

    I recently bought a 4-port KVM with DVI video and USB support for keyboard and mouse. I have the KVM hooked up to my dual processor G5 with DVI, to the ATI Radeon 9600 Pro video card in it. When I switch between my Windows Vista PC and my Mac (both running 85hz refresh rate and 1280x1024 resolution), the video is fine on the PC, but the Mac video is first initialized at 800x600 at 60hz. After about 3 seconds, it switches to 1280x1024 at 85hz, but this screws up my program views. I run Final Cut Express HD and DVD Studio Pro 2.0 and the windows in these programs are totally messed up. I have tried updating the drivers to the newest one from ATI, leaving the KVM on until Mac OS X Tiger is totally booted up to my desktop, before switching to one of my PCs, and updating the firmware on the KVM. Has anyone else had this problem? Any ideas to correct this problem? Thank you for your help!

    Problem solved.....I used a little shareware program called SwitchResX:
    http://www.madrau.com/html/SRX/About.html
    Fabulous little problem solver. You can set up custom resolutions of just about any dimension, although I only tested my needed resolution, and magically once you restart the machine, the resolutions are available in the Display preferences pane. If the display doesn't look right at first, i.e. shifted to the left or right, keep playing with it and perhaps switch back to a different resolution and then back to your custom res and all should be well. 75 Mhz as a refresh rate seemed to make my video card and the monitor happiest.
    Cheers.

  • Sale on Dell UltraSharp U2711 and U3011 Monitors

    I noticed while over at the Tom's Hardware site a decent sale on two of the top-of-the-line Dell monitors.  I know this looks like spam but I'm not affiliated with Tom's hardware in any way; I'm just passing on what looks like a decent price, for any of you who might be ready to buy a monitor...
    U2711 - $807
    U3011 - $1196
    Both are with free shipping.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/news/deals-ultrasharp-lcd-monitor-sale,16180.html
    The U3011 is the one I'd get if I had a spare $1196 handy right at this moment.  Maybe I can find a way to scrape enough together in the next day or so...  2560 x 1600 could replace my current dual monitor 3200 x 1200 desktop nicely I think.  If only there was something actually wrong with these old Dell U2001FPs...  Where's my coffee cup...
    Here are some pretty good in-depth reviews on these monitors:
    http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2711.htm
    http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u3011.htm
    -Noel

    It's just 100 ppi on the 30 incher, Trevor.  That's the beauty of it being so big.  As it turns out the dual 20 inchers I'm running now are 100ppi, and I find it to be a very sweet resolution (not that I wouldn't like 200 ppi).
    I suppose that's a possible downside to getting one of these monitors now...  It could end up that right around the corner are super high resolution monitors that would make one regret purchasing "old tech".
    I got to thinking about video cards yesterday evening, and I almost worked myself up to pulling the trigger on the U3011 plus a new VisionTek ATI Radeon 7850 (2 GB) with 3x the performance of my current video card.
    I'm quite used to my 3200 x 1200 desktop, so changing to a 2560 x 1600 desktop might be just a bit of a challenge...  When not doing Photoshop I often tend to put reference materials on one monitor while actively working on the other.  Of course, I could retain one or both of these perfectly functional 20" monitors turned up sideways as "ears" on both sides and just add the 30" unit in the center...  THAT would be an amazing desktop!
    Lundberg, I appreciate your skepticism, but the Dell U3011 to me right now represents the most attractive offering out there.
    -Noel

  • Connecting Dell UltraSharp U2212HM to Belkin Thunderbolt Dock

    Hi , ive just bought a new MBPro 13 retina and also a Dell UltraSharp U2212HM and a Belkin Thunderbolt express Dock so that i can connect via single th/bolt cable, could anyone help me with regards to which cable that i need to connect the monitor to the dock? thank you

    Hi there, I just bought a Belkin thunderbolt dock and I want to ask that can't I use additional thunderbolt port to output a mini DP signal to my ASUS PA279q?
    Because when I plug into the ports, it start refreshing 2~3 seconds a time. Seems my screen doesn't get the signal.
    P.S. I use Apple thunderbolt cable to connect my Macbook Pro Classic 2012 and mini DP to HDMI cable to connect between dock and screen.

  • Dell Ultrasharp U2410 WFP or HP2475W for my new MacPro?

    I purchased a new MacPro quadcore 2.8. I use Adobe Illustrator CS5 and Adobe Elements to make Fishing and Diving charts printed on sheet fed presses. I am looking for a 24" to 27", 16:10 aspect ratio monitor for this new system and cannot deal with the glossy screens. I believe my choices are down to the Dell Ultrasharp U2410WFP and the HP2475W. Anyone have any input on either of these 2? Is there a better choice?
    Please I could use some help.

    On Windows side, Paragon Software has a nice set of tools for Macs, for Wiindows on Mac, as well as Windows only. CampTune X to install Windows. Clone OS to SSD/HDD for Windows (sort of CCC variant). And other tools.
    You may have to put Windows on the 1TB SSD, which would be nice for performance.
    I think you need to consider more RAM.
    I would strongly look at one or more Thunderbolt cases for PCIe cards, and Thunderbolt storage for data.
    A TB case with 1-2 Sonnet or other (whoever supports the nMP 6,1 and Thunderbolt under 10.9.x) Tempo Pro SSD for scratch.
    www.sonnettech.com look at their Thunderbolt section
    A case for 4-8 drives like www.macgurus.com  talk to them, to Rick, very helpful on RAID and support, even hand-holding when needed to walk you through and educate or get up to speed. Sounds like 4 x 2TB would do well for your needs for quite awhile.
    You coud put a 2-4TB WD Black on Thunderbolt or USB3 (a TB to SATA adapter) for your media files, documents, and such that you keep in your home folder.
    RAID6 is safer than RAID for your projects and work.
    Mavericks supports software RAID "mirror + stripe" for redundacy and performance but at the cost of using twice as many drives.
    USB3 (2) for TimeMachine and a system restore image (clone)
    The sweet spot is likely BTO 6-core w/ 32GB RAM and a step up in GPUs I would guess.

  • Question about Radeon 9600 variants (plain vs Pro vs XT)

    Hi I just recently purchased a refurbished dual-processor 2.0 GHz G5 (early 2005) and I have become curious about the video card. Based on press releases, my video card is an OEM 128 MB Radeon 9600 card.
    I'd like to know what were the specs of the different Radeon 9600 variants that Apple included as OEM video cards. As far as a I can gather there are 3 Radeon 9600 types: Radeon 9600 (plain), Radeon 9600 XT, and Radeon 9600 Pro.
    The following information is what I've been able to figure out. Please correct and add to what I've typed so that I can better understand what my own video card is. Thanks
    OEM Radeon 9600 (plain)
    128 MB VRAM
    8x AGP (?)
    OEM card for dual 2.0 & 2.3 GHz G5 (early 2005)
    OEM Radeon 9600 XT:
    128 MB VRAM
    8X AGP (?)
    OEM card for dual 2.5 GHz G5 (2004)
    OEM Radeon 9600 Pro
    64 MB VRAM
    8x AGP (?)
    OEM card for 1st gen. dual 2.0 GHz G5 (2003)
    Retail ATI 9600 Pro PC & Mac Edition
    256 MB VRAM
    ?? AGP (don't know)
    Given that my machine is an early 2005 G5, I take it my video card is the plain 128 MB Radeon 9600. Here's my video info from ASP.
    Chipset Model: ATY,RV351
    Type: Display
    Bus: AGP
    Slot: SLOT-1
    VRAM (Total): 128 MB
    Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
    Device ID: 0x4150
    Revision ID: 0x0000
    ROM Revision: 113-A58504-113
    Considering that my G5 is an early 2005 model, is the Radeon 9600 that I have faster or slower than the Radeon 9600 XT that was available in the 2004 G5?
    Dual 2.0 Ghz G5 (Early 2005)   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    This question has been bugging me too.
    Apparently - the variations in the cards have to do with the [GPU] processor and the speed of the memory used in the video card.
    The difference is clockspeed. They're identical otherwise.
    In the ATi naming procedure, the progression in extensions is: SE, nothing, Pro, and XT, with XT being the fastest.
    The 9600 is clocked slower than the 9600 XT and 9600 Pro, and bench marks usually show a noticeable margin between the 9600 and 9600 Pro.
    The "plain" 9600 would be the slowest and the 9600XT would be the fastest.
    Someone please correct me - if I'm wrong.
    PM G5 1.8 SP REV A   Mac OS X (10.4.2)  

  • Dell Ultrasharp 2707WFP 27" and G5

    Hi there, hoping someone can help.
    I am interested in the Dell Ultrasharp 2707WFP 27" widescreen LCD monitor but I need to know if it is compatible with my computer (I contacted Dell but they said to try the Apple forums). Here are the specs for my computer: 1.8GHz Power Mac G5, 1GB DDR400 SDRAM, 160GB Serial ATA - 7200rpm, *ATI Radeon 9600 Pro*, operating system is Mac OS 10.3.9.
    Thanks!!

    Yes, it'll work just fine. That monitor only needs a single-link DVI port which your ATi Radeon 9600 will have.
    The built-in card reader will also work, as long as you plug the monitor's USB plug into your Mac.

  • Radeon 9600 Pro and Westinghouse 19" Widescreen Mon.  1440 X 900 Possible?

    I have a G4 MDD with a Radeon 9600 Pro, 256 Mb card with dual DVI outs. I just got two Westinghouse 19' widescreen monitors which have a max res of 1440 X 900. Problem is when I try to set the res of the two monitors in the Displays pane, there is no selection for 1440 x 900. In fact all the settings appear to be 4:3 aspect ratios..... The card seems to have enough juice to drive both monitors as they look fairly decent at a res that is close to the 1440 x 900 but the image is obviously stretched. How do I get a 1440 x 900 selection in my Display pane in System Preferences? Please tell me this res can be driven by this card......
    Thanks.
    j....

    Problem solved.....I used a little shareware program called SwitchResX:
    http://www.madrau.com/html/SRX/About.html
    Fabulous little problem solver. You can set up custom resolutions of just about any dimension, although I only tested my needed resolution, and magically once you restart the machine, the resolutions are available in the Display preferences pane. If the display doesn't look right at first, i.e. shifted to the left or right, keep playing with it and perhaps switch back to a different resolution and then back to your custom res and all should be well. 75 Mhz as a refresh rate seemed to make my video card and the monitor happiest.
    Cheers.

  • Macbook Late 2011 and Dell UltraSharp 29"

    Hi! I have a Macbook 13" Late 2011 and i'm about to buy a Dell UltraSharp 29" (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2414974,00.asp). I would like to know if my Macbook will be able to support the maximum resolution 2560x1080. Anyone knows if the Minidisplay Port is enough to support the res? Or should i buy an adapter? Thanks for your time guys.

    The last MacBook was a mid 2010 even though it was made into 2012. It will support a max resolution of 2560x1600 on a second display. http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook/specs/macbook-core-2-duo-2.4-white -13-polycarbonate-unibody-mid-2010-specs.html

  • ATI Radeon 9600 and PowerMac G4 QuickSilver - problem

    Hi guys!
    Sorry for the big amount of posts but I have yet another problem.
    Yesterday I replaced the stock Nvidia GeForce2 MX in my QuickSilver with an OEM ATI Radeon 9600 128MB from my G5. I taped the pins 3 and 11 and the card worked immediately.
    After using the Mac a bit, I noticed that the graphic performances are pretty much exactly the same as before. I installed Leopard and I got the translucent menubar, but the graphic performances are terrible (seems exactly as bad as the GeForce).
    Does anyone have the same issue? Here is a screenshot from System Profiler in both Tiger and Leopard:
    And here are some Xbench scores (the same card in the G5 scored about 121 points):

    The DP800 shoild help, especiall the 1 MB L3 per CPU, but the Bus speed is still a bottleneck.
    Overall, the Geekbench scores almost doubled, from 372 on the 733, to 670 on the DP800, which was mostly CPU not Graphics improvement, but you should see some.
    I only have Xbench results for my QS2001 with upgraded CPUs to 1.47 DP/7455s & an MX2 it seems...
    Results
    146.05
    System Info
    Xbench Version
    1.1
    System Version
    10.3.5
    Physical RAM
    1024 MB
    Model
    PowerMac3,5
    Processor
    PowerPC G4x2 @ 1.47 GHz
    Version
    7455 (Apollo) v3.3
    L1 Cache
    32K (instruction), 32K (data)
    L2 Cache
    256K @ 1467 MHz
    L3 Cache
    2048K @ 4.16 GHz
    Bus Frequency
    134 MHz
    Video Card
    GeForce2 TwinView
    Drive Type
    WDC WD1200BB-00CAA0
    CPU Test
    163.16
    GCD Recursion
    182.54
    7.13 Mops/sec
    Floating Point Basic
    183.66
    653.17 Mflop/sec
    AltiVec Basic
    182.95
    2.66 Gflop/sec
    vecLib FFT
    113.59
    1.75 Gflop/sec
    Floating Point Library
    183.42
    7.34 Mops/sec
    Thread Test
    187.53
    Computation
    177.19
    1.43 Mops/sec, 4 threads
    Lock Contention
    199.15
    2.50 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
    Memory Test
    116.12
    System
    159.57
    Allocate
    857.50
    289.11 Kalloc/sec
    Fill
    124.56
    991.53 MB/sec
    Copy
    104.09
    520.46 MB/sec
    Stream
    91.27
    Copy
    93.16
    379.93 MB/sec [altivec]
    Scale
    91.50
    380.09 MB/sec [altivec]
    Add
    89.52
    377.76 MB/sec [altivec]
    Triad
    90.99
    374.51 MB/sec [altivec]
    Quartz Graphics Test
    145.34
    Line
    119.01
    3.03 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
    Rectangle
    123.73
    8.70 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
    Circle
    135.90
    3.13 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
    Bezier
    130.84
    1.42 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
    Text
    342.87
    5.59 Kchars/sec
    OpenGL Graphics Test
    153.13
    Spinning Squares
    153.13
    107.16 frames/sec
    User Interface Test
    233.57
    Elements
    233.57
    79.47 refresh/sec
    Disk Test
    98.39
    Sequential
    107.10
    Uncached Write
    109.10
    43.43 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write
    110.63
    43.18 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    96.87
    15.33 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    113.40
    45.82 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Random
    90.99
    Uncached Write
    79.92
    1.14 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write
    92.08
    20.77 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    92.10
    0.61 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    102.80
    21.16 MB/sec [256K blocks]

  • MS-6309 motherboard and ATi radeon 9600 Pro

    I have a MS-6309 motherboard. I have recently installed an ATi Radeon 9600 Pro 128MB graphics card and am having some problems. I am running Windows 98. I can't get Direct 3D and AGP Texture Acceleration (this is disabled) to work. I want to download the latest drivers for my motherboard but don't know which link to choose on the motherboard drivers page of the MSI web site.
    The problems that occur are:
    1) The screen freezes up
    2) The graphics on the screen go blurry
    3) Everything stops and the monitor switches off
    I am sure this is a driver issue and not a hardware issue. Please can someone help me!

    chances are you need a better psu than you had before actually
    http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=124
    has the drivers

  • ATI Radeon 9600 Pro and 2560 x 1600

    Hi,
    I've got a Radeon 9600 pro and just purchased a new 30" display. However, I can't seem to get it running at 2560 x 1600 - does this card support this resolution?

    You will need a graphics card with dual-link DVI.
    Starting with the fastest:
    ATI Radeon X800 XT 256MB (ADC, dual-link DVI)
    <http://www.welovemacs.com/0831xeghr.html>
    NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra 256 MB (Two dual-link DVI)
    <http://www.welovemacs.com/6613332.html>
    NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT 256 MB (Two dual-link DVI)
    <http://www.welovemacs.com/6613441.html>
    ATI Radeon 9650 XT (Single-link, dual-link DVI)
    <http://www.mac-pro.com/ATI-Radeon-9650-256MB-for-G5-661-3593?sc=2&category=42>
    ATI Radeon® 9600 Pro PC & MAC Edition 256MB AGP (Single-link, dual-link DVI)
    <http://shop.ati.com/product.asp?sku=3170809>

  • I have an early 2008 Mac Pro, 8 gb ram with a Dell 27" display and a 42" LG TV. I am thinking about upgrading the stock ATI Radeon 2600 graphics card for better resolution, preferring 2 dvi outputs. Does anyone have any suggestions on the best card?

    I have an early 2008 Mac Pro, 8 gb ram with a Dell 27” display and a 42” LG TV. I am thinking about upgrading the stock ATI Radeon 2600 graphics card for better resolution, preferring 2 dvi outputs or 1 dvi and 1 vga vs 1 dvi and a mini. I don't do a lot of Final Cut Pro, gaming, etc. I am interested in best value for the graphics card.
    Does anyone have any suggestions on the best graphics card for these larger displays for the best value?
    Thanks,
    Kevin

    I recommend you install nothing older than the Apple-firware 5770, about US$250.
    RE: Mac Pro Replacement Graphics cards
    1) Apple brand cards,
    2) "sold in the Apple store" cards, and
    3) "Mac Edition" cards ...
    ... show all the screens, including Boot up screens, Safe Mode, Installer, Recovery, debug screens, and Alt/Option boot screens. At this writing, these choices include:
    1) Apple brand cards:
    • Apple-firmware 5770, about US$250** works near full speed in every model Mac Pro, Drivers in 10.6.5
    • Apple-firmware 5870, about US$450
    2) "sold in the Apple store" cards
    • NVIDIA Quadro 4000, about US$1200
    • NVIDIA Quadro 5000, about US$2500
    3) "Mac Edition" cards -- REQUIRE 10.8.3 or later:
    • SAPPHIRE HD 7950 3GB GDDR5 MAC Edition, about US$480** Vendor recommends Mac Pro 4,1
    • EVGA GTX 680 Mac Edition, about US$600
    The cards above require no more than the provided two 6-pin aux power connectors provided in the Mac Pro through 2012 model. Aux cables may not be provided for third-party cards, but are readily available.
    If you are Meet ALL of these:
    • running 10.8.3 or later AND
    • don't care about "no boot screens" etc AND
    • can re-wire or otherwise "work out" the power cabling, THEN:
    You can use many more cards, even most "PC-only cards"

  • 20" ACD, ATI Radeon 9600, and Me

    hello all!
    Just a quick question. I'm (semi) technically proficient and am pretty good with hardware, but still uneasy with Apple stuff.
    I have a ATI Radeon 9600 I believe (It's somewhere around there; whatever came stock with the unit)and I'm going to purchase a 20" ACD in a couple of weeks and have a question:
    Now I know that the card is a massive 64 MB! (lol) and I've never upgraded cause never really had a reason. I am aware of splitting your vram over 2 displays can hinder the display causing ghosting and graininess and wondered what you guys thought about purchasing another card to run this display. I have to hold onto my ATI because of the ADC connector, and dropping 99 bucks for a converter is not a wise decision for me quite yet. Now I've been made aware of running multiple cards on a unit. It can't be as simple as popping in another card and taking it from there would it?!? The OS would go nucking futs figuring out what card to use and such I would assume.
    So, after all that rigamarole:
    CAN I run 2 cards on my MDD dual G4?
    If so, how?
    also, SHOULD I run a second card if I can (you guys with this setup can help me tons!)
    if so, what card would you guys recommend. I'm looking around the 128 MB variety. I don't want to break the bank, getting an 800 dollar display, then a 300 dollar card.
    edit: also, the max rez on the 17" studio is 1280 x 1024 and the 20" ACD 1680 x 1050. That shouldn't be a problem should it? I mean, it's only REALLY adding pixels length wise, and only 26 more height so the 20" won't be knocked down in rez to make up for this right?
    (forgive my ignorance, though I've used the dual-display setup, I've never owned one. and to be fair, that one had the same size monitors on both)
    So, guys (and gals) help me out here!

    Mr Mayhem,
    if I understand you correctly, you want to use the (older/ADC connection) 17" apple display together with the (newer/DVI connection) 20" apple display together on your MDD Dual 1 G.
    My first advice would be to get two displays of the same kind. You will love that (equal screen resolutions just feel better somehow) ... get a 2nd hand 17" or, even better, ditch the 17" and get two 20".
    In case you rather stick to your original plan - just get the ATi Radeon 9200 Mac Edition and put it in one of the PCI slots of your MDD. It will feed the 20" via DVI conncetor and it'll cost you roughly around 100.- and the 128 MB onboard RAM will be ok for standard use; maybe just not for betatesting Quake VII Arena. Probably the best bang for buck in your situation. Lood Guck !

Maybe you are looking for

  • MeeGo on the n900?

    With Intel and Nokia working together on a new Mobile OS, where does this put Maemo updates for the n900 in the future?  It will start to come out in Q2 2010, so will it work on the n900 as it stands? If tnis post is a cure to your issue, please MARK

  • ATV no longer connects any mobile devices.

    I can't connect to my ATV with my iphones or ipad. Home sharing is on on all my devices wifi is connected. I can get netflix with it I can connect with my macbook. But I can't use the remote app or connect with the ipod or pictures or movies. they we

  • How to send an analog output signal on same axis running a stepping motor umi 7764/ PCI7334

    I am running a single axis stepping motor (which is working fine) but for the application I need to be able to turn on and off a 5 volt laser.  It notes in the manual for the UMI 7764  that the the analog output can be used as a general-purpose volta

  • Account Payables with Procurement data query

    Hi Gurus,          Anyone who developed reports on a query of Account Payables with Procurement data.. the sources of fields are from R/3....          Can you provide me with the business content or the datasources you use? Thanks.. Irish

  • Multiple NICs on same server

    Hey Guys! I'm trying to configure some iSCSI connections on a server with 2 NICs. Now i also have two separate SAN boxes so i was thinking of dedicating one nic to each box. I've read that there can be issues if these nics are on the same subnet but