Delta documentation for SEM BCS/CPM 6.0

Hi Team,
Please let me know the link or document for SEM 6.0 delta changes compared to SEM 4.0 In BCS componet and CPM component.
Regards
Naveen.KV

In the SAP Support Portal click on Release and Upgrade Info, then choose Release Notes > SAP Solutions > SAP ERP > ECC 6.0. Chapter 10 refers to BCS changes.

Similar Messages

  • ABAP/4 Keywords for all SAP R/3 Versions with Delta Documentation for abap

    Hello Experts,
          Do please provide me with the way to find out the Delta Documentations for ABAP for all version of SAP R/3 starting from 3.0 to 6.0
    points will be awarded if helpful.
    Thanks in Advance

    Log on to SAP.  Use transaction ABAP_DOCU.  Click on Keyword Help.  Don't enter an ABAP keyword, press cont. button.
    In the window that opens, in the tree on the left handside, you'll see ABAP Changes By Release.
    This contains all the information you need.
    matt

  • Best Practice for SEM BCS

    Hi Experts
    I am new to Business Process Expert forum
    I need best practice for SEM BCS
    Please provide this because now client is going for BCS
    Regards
    madhu

    Hi,
    Check the below link
    http://service.sap.com/sem
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/BBlibrary_start.htm
    http://www.sap.com/services/bysubject/servsuptech/servicedetail.epx?context=0DFA5A0C701B93893897C14DC7FFA7D62DC24E6E9A4B8FFC77CA0603A1ECCF58A86F0DCC6CCC177ED84EA76F625FC1E9C6DCDA90C9389A397DAB524E480931FB6B96F168ACE1F8BA2AFC61C9F8A28B651682A04F7CEAA0C4%7c0E320720D451E81CDACA9CEB479AA7E5E2B8164BEC98FE2B092F54AF5F9035AABA8D9DDCD87520DB9DA337A831009FFCD48481C5303AD678660B98A9A774375E331624C67CA047434EBA90730E493FF0BFB1BB640522E0F07F44B0200E66CB1CE69AFC8F8D70D2E7CA4371D70EBE8BE6F4515C2270D61D1013E466E330C57AF9B428B7BC291B17A1613688924F623A869AB0A51667617DDF8714BFD577DA42FC

  • Best Practice  for SEM-BCS Implementation

    Hello Gurus
    Can I find any Help/suggestions  and or Link to Best Practices(BP)  for  SEM-BCS implementation only ?
    please advice
    thx
    Ramana_12

    This is far too general to answer in this forum. I suggest you ask specific questions about the various functions available and pros and cons to each can be provided.
    Edited by: Dan Sullivan on Apr 28, 2010 10:47 AM

  • R/3 Data Source for SEM BCS

    Hi Guys,
    I am using 0FI_GL_4 data source of R3 for SEM BCS.Am i right in doing so,please guide.
    As per my understanding transaction data has to be taken to BCS for consolidation and hence this is the relevent data source.
    Please provide comments on my understanding.
    We are working in the following enviornment:
    R3 version ECC6.0
    SEM BCS ver 6.0
    BW ver 7.0
    Best Regards
    Amit

    Hi Amit,
    It is enough normmally.
    There are many  data sources. It all depends what is your reporting requirement or what level of data to be extracted.
    Let me know your reporting requirements to answer further

  • Licensing concept for SEM BCS

    Hi Experts,
    I would like to know about the current licensing concept for SEM BCS.
    1. Does it come bundled with SAP BI 7.0 i.e with the license of SAP BI 7.0? or
    2. One has to buy an additional license apart from the one for SAP BI 7.0?
    Thanks.

    I thought it came bundled because I have been at clients previously where they have recognised that they were effectively wasting money by NOT using the various SEM components (that they were already paying for).
    howwever, the easiest source of an answer would be to phone your local SAP sales office:
    http://www12.sap.com/contactsap/countries/index.epx

  • Transactional data for SEM-BCS

    Dear experts!
    We are working in a SEM-BCS project and wonder which is the best solution to load data from FI-GL into BCS.
    As far as I know there are two possibilities to do this:
    .) extract form RFBILA00 and then use the flexible upload method
    .) load the data into a FI-GL-cube in BW and then use the read from data stream method
    Does anybody have experience with these two variants and know about the advantages/disadvantages?
    Does it make a difference if you use new or old general ledger (concerning the load scenario)?
    For me the load from the info cube looks more elegant, but the sap help documentation describes only the RFBILA00-extract (if you look for integration with other SAP systems).
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    Best regards
    Michael

    Hi Michael,
    - Abt. RFBILA00 - I tried to use it but refused. Maybe I wasn't lucky enough, but I couldn't get partners.
    - Abt extraction to BW - try to use 0SEM_BCS_10.
    - I also used to activate extraction total records to GLT3 and then using the generic datasource extracted it in BW.
    - There are many ways for extacting data in BW. I even saw such a decision where the whole huge BSEG table was used.
    A work with new GL, IMHI, is preferable for BCS consolidation since there are some features that make a life a bit easier (it's easier to setup ERP in order to extract all info needed).

  • Remote Extractor and Real Time Infocube for SEM BCS

    Hi Experts,
    I have somes doubts about the integration between SEM and BW.
    There is a cycle that have the next processes:
    1.- begin in R/3 with the movements in FI, CO and/or general ledgers
    2.- Activate the extractors standards for replicate/extract data to BW. For example, 0FI_GL_XXXX.
    3.- Configure a method for take the information from BW to SEM.
    4.- My doubt begin here... For take the information from SEM to the real time infocube, where I configure?  What Have I for configure?
    The real time infocube, What is the proposal? Where take the data?  Here, Do the remote extractor begin to apply?
    Thank you very much for your collaboration.
    Regards,
    Jeysi Ascanio

    We're using 0FI_GL_20 to read directly from FAGLFLEXT into SEM-BCS via a BI remote cube.  There are some basic transformations in BI to "populate" the remote cube, then a standard Load from Data Stream in BCS to do final mappings.  In the BCS workbench, just create a source data basis off the remote cube.
    This works at my current project due to fairly low ECC data volumes.  If you are doing any complex mapping on the Company or Fiscal Year / Period infoobjects, you may need to create a inverse mapping routine in the remote cube to transfer selection criteria.  If you see messages in the monitor following a data load such as "xx,xxx of xxx,xxx records ignored", that means that you are reading too much data from ECC and it is only getting filtered on the BCS side.  We had this problem with a custom extractor and adding an inverse mapping routine cut the load from ~5min to 30sec.  (Basically, the custom, template-delivered, extractor only had 0FISCPER, not 0FISCPER3 and 0FISCYEAR, so we would read all 17 K4 periods into BI, map them into BCS, then BCS would throw out the unneeded periods.  Unfortunately, we did not have the option to change the extractor, so this was the best approach.).
    If I had large data volumes, I would use a regular BI basic cube for staging (or possibly a multi-cube with a mix of basic and realtime, depending on the load requirements to BCS).
    If you use 0FI_GL_20, I would strongly recommend you implement OSS Note 1245822, or be on SAP_APPL 603.0002 or later.
    Hope that helps,
    - Chris

  • Any landscape recommendations for 2004s BI & SEM-BCS 6.0 ?

    Hi,
    in addition to our ERP 2005 we plan to set up a separate central BI 7.0 for following integrated NW2004s scenarios:
    - Enterprise wide central reporting, query and analysis.
    - BI Integrated Planning (successor of SEM-BPS).
    - SEM-BCS 6.0.
    <u>Question:</u>
    Should the BCS be installed on a separate system, because of patch interdependencies with the central BI?
    If yes, does BCS still need its own local BI, or can it run remotely with the central BI (like the old BW-BPS)?
    Similar sap recommendations exist only for SEM-BPS, which we won't use in favor of BI Integrated Planning.
    I searched the whole sap.marketplace for this, in vain.
    The installations and combination-possibilities are beautifully explained, but no official recommendations about what should all be put on one central BI and what should be better kept apart.
    Rumors say you should keep SEM out of your central BI and give it its own BI, to avoid painful patch/release dependencies.
    What about the "single point of truth"-conecept in one central BI then?
    Thank's for any hints ...
    Robert

    Hi Eugene,
    thanks for your callback. Here an example:
    Say, you need a BI-Patch (urgent bug-fix) or may be a BI-Upgrade to be able to use new functionalities for your Enterprise wide central reporting, query and analysis (since you don't use the BI only for BCS).
    So, you would have to wait, until the same is also available for SEM-BCS, as it it tightly coupled to the BI (e.g. direct writing to transactional cubes, query via virtual cube augmented with data at query-runtime).
    Notes like 727776 and 317339 just make me suspicious.
    A similar SAP Help-hint is only available for BW-BPS (but we will use BI integrated Planning)
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/44/584041b02e4c0de10000000a1550b0/content.htm
    Since more and more SAP-Applications need a BI, i am desperately missing a comprehensive overview, which of them should not be placed in the same BI for technical reasons (e.g. one sap-note says Bank-Analyzer and SEM-BCS should not be on the same BI).
    Regards
    Robert

  • Authorizations for tasks (R_UC_TASK) / Best Practice SEM-BCS authorization

    Dear Experts,
    I am quite new to authorizations and in particular to SEM-BCS authorization. So I would be happy if you could help me with the following requirement:
    We have to setup an authorization concepts for SEM-BCS. Among others we want to setup authorizations for consolidations tasks using authorization object R_UC_TASK. With this authorization object certain tasks can be restricted to certain characteristic values u2013 e.g. for a certain consolidation group or a certain consolidation unit. We have defined a role each for certain consolidation tasks. These roles are not restricted to any characteristic value yet. We have for instance a role u201Cregional controlleru201D who is allowed to perform certain BCS tasks on a regional level (consolidation unit level). This would mean that we would have to create the role u201Cregional controlleru201D for all consolidation units u2013 see example below:
    Role 1: Regional Controller u2013 Cons. Unit 1000
    Role 2: Regional Controller u2013 Cons. Unit 1100
    Role 3: Regional Controller u2013 Cons. Unit 1200
    Role n: Regional Controller u2013 Cons. Unit n
    We have more than 400 consolidation units. So this would require a high effort. Is there instead a possibility of creating one role based on authorization object R_UC_TASK which just defines which activities can be performed (without restricting access to a certain consolidation unit). , and using second role which defines the consolidation unit access? u2013 see example below:
    A
    Role: Regional Controller
    Role: Cons Unit 1000
    B
    Role: Regional Controller
    Role: Cons Unit 1100
    C
    Role: Regional Controller
    Role: Cons Unit 1200
    In this case we only would have to maintain one role u201CRegional Controlleru201D and we only would have to assign the restriction for the consolidation unit. How could this be realized?  Or do you have any other ideas to solve this requirement in a simple way?
    Moreover I would be happy if you could tell me where I could find best practice scenarios for SEM-BCS authorizations.
    Thanks a lot in advance!
    Best regards
    Marco

    Hello Marco,
    you can enter a master role in the description tab of a role. All fields populated via program PFCG_ORGFIELD_CREATE can be maintained in the role. All other fields will be taken from the master role. So you only need to populate the field for unit with the program.
    Good luck
    Harry

  • SEM-BCS Step COI

    Hi,
    Any one can explain or forward a document for handling step consolidation of investments.
    Thanks and regards
    Naveen.KV

    CoI is the most complicated part of consolidation.
    There is still  no good documentation on SEM-BCS, and CoI in particular.
    Do you expect that someone will write a doc on this topic for you and send it to you?
    In the SAP mentor forum were some 2008 suggestions. One of them was the more tight connections with SAP employees. Don't you have these connections? You are from SAP, aren't you?
    Can't you get this information from your colleagues?

  • BW Based SEM BCS

    Hello...
    I have a problem as explained below , will appricate if anybody can share there experience to help me out of it. THX IN ADVANCE....
    <b>Problem :</b>
    We are using standard extractor 0SEM_BCS_10 for extracting R/3 data for SEM-BCS. We observed that Company ID of Trading partner was not being extracted even for those line items in FI which has Trading partner value.
    We investigated and observed this extractor fetches data from new GL Stagging ledger and further noticed that the stagging ledger captures this information about trading partner only if Scenario "Preparation for Consolidation" is assigned to the stagging ledger. But the problem is extractor is capturing the above information only prospectively and we have the requirment to capture Trading partner information even for our historic data.
    Is there any way we can achive this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Prabhakar

    Hi
    Do you have some document on BCS ?
    Thanks
    Satya

  • Extraction fo data for SEM 6 from ECC6

    Hi Gurus,
    We are working on to set up SEM 6.0 with ECC6 as the transactioanl system.
    Please could you help solving the following doubts in this regard: -
    1) Is this true that in order to get consolidation relevant fields (like Trading partner, Partner profit center
    etc.) we should use DS 0SEM_BCS_10 and not DS 0FI_GL_10? SAP Note 852971 suggests as follows: -
    '.......The DataSource 0FI_GL_10 is available in the BI business content for the extraction of data of the leading ledger from the new general ledger accounting to BW. However, only one part of the transferred fields can be updated by the structure of the data flow saved in the BI content. This is due to technical constraints during the update into an ODS object. The partner fields that are relevant for consolidation are not updated in the InfoProvider 0FI_GL_10 and, therefore, you cannot use it as the "staging" InfoProvider for SEM-BCS.
    SAP delivers the DataSource 0SEM_BCS_10 for the data collection of the leading ledger from the new general ledger into the consolidation. This allows you to set up another data transfer branch to SEM-BCS without affecting the data transfer to the InfoProvider of the new general ledger......'
    What is not clear from above is whether we need to use both the data sources or we can manage with 0SEM_BCS_10.
    2) Is the BI content statging cube for BCS 0FI_GL_10?
    3) I believe that we need to create some other data sources to load data from non-leading ledgers. Are we going to load data from non-leading ledgers to the same staging cube in BW (0FI_GL_C10)? If yes how the data will be differentiated? There could be various sets of data in the same inforprovider for each parallel ledger.
    Please advise.
    BR,
    SSC

    Hi,
    1. We use 0SEM_BCS_10. It clear said in notes that 0FI_GL_10 is not useful.
    2. No, AFAIK, it's a custom cube.
    3. If you use the flex GL why you are going to use non-leading ledger.
    More info you may find using search.
    Particularly, here:
    Re: 0SEM_BCS_10 or 0FI_GL_10
    I provided some more notes on the theme.

  • 2004s BI & SEM-BCS 6.0 in one System?

    Hi,
    Rumors say you should keep SEM out of your central BI and give it its own BI, to avoid painful patch/release dependencies.
    Should the SEM-BCS be installed on a separate system, because of patch interdependencies with the central BI?
    If yes, does BCS still need its own local BI, or can it run remotely with the central BI (like the old BW-BPS)?
    Similar sap recommendations exist only for SEM-BPS, which we won't use in favor of BI Integrated Planning.
    We plan to set up a separate central BI 7.0 for following integrated NW2004s scenarios:
    - Enterprise wide central reporting, query and analysis.
    - BI Integrated Planning (successor of SEM-BPS).
    - SEM-BCS 6.0.
    Thank's for any hints ...
    Robert

    Hi Eugene,
    thanks for your callback. Here an example:
    Say, you need a BI-Patch (urgent bug-fix) or may be a BI-Upgrade to be able to use new functionalities for your Enterprise wide central reporting, query and analysis (since you don't use the BI only for BCS).
    So, you would have to wait, until the same is also available for SEM-BCS, as it it tightly coupled to the BI (e.g. direct writing to transactional cubes, query via virtual cube augmented with data at query-runtime).
    Notes like 727776 and 317339 just make me suspicious.
    A similar SAP Help-hint is only available for BW-BPS (but we will use BI integrated Planning)
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/44/584041b02e4c0de10000000a1550b0/content.htm
    Since more and more SAP-Applications need a BI, i am desperately missing a comprehensive overview, which of them should not be placed in the same BI for technical reasons (e.g. one sap-note says Bank-Analyzer and SEM-BCS should not be on the same BI).
    Regards
    Robert

  • General Questions about SEM-BCS Data Transfer

    Please help me guys ! I need a clearer picture as to how exactly the loading of data should be done to SAP SEM-Busines Consolidation
    Q1) Can I specify the Basic Cubes in my Data Basis Streams that I use for FI & CO in BCS-Workbench ? Or do I need to switch these cubes to Transactional, so it can be used in SEM-BCS ?
    Q2) or Do I have to export the data out of my FI & CO cubes in BW to a FLAT FILE, and then load the Flat File into custom Transactional Cubes ?
    Q3) Usually, for SEM-BCS would there be any direct connection to SAP R/3 or it`s via BW ?
    Please help me with these initial issues guys ! Very much appreciated!

    Hi Eugene,
       Great man! You`re back!...Nice to hear from yourself
       Anyways, I still am struggling to understand the Intergration from SEM-BCS with BW and/or R/3. If you have any material that can help me understand the intergration would be helpful.
       So, I had a look into the SAP Note 689229
       It says, all changes of master data nad hierarchies have to be made via the application layer by means of application SEM-BCS :-
      a) By Flexible Upload
      b) Manually in Consolidation Workbench
      c) In Subordinate systems from transports
      Hence, am I correct to assume that the only 2 options are permitted: Option (a) Flat File (b) Manually define the master data in BCS-Workbench ?
        So, now assuming that I need to define Consolidation Items into SEM-BCS.
      Because  there's too many, I would go with option (b) Flat File.
      So, I create a Flat File containing the Consolidation Items. Next, how do I get this loaded into BCS-Console ?
      Do I have to create a Transactional Info Cube and then load this Consolidation Items Flat File into it? Then following from there, I specify this Transactional Info Cube in my Data Stream ? or
      Is there a way, I can directly read the Flat File from SEM-BCS ?
      I use the following Info Cubes as source to my Data Basis:-
                       <b>Data Target  | Virtual InfoProvider</b>
      TOTAL RECORDS =   0BCS_C50    |     0ECCS_C05
      DOCUMENTS     =   0BCS_DS12   |     0BCS_VC12
       P/S: We don`t use the SAP R/3 ECCS Module
    Message was edited by: John Mcluskey

Maybe you are looking for