Demand Not considered by Heuristics

Hello ,
I have a customer and plant , i have maintained stock at plant and have manually entered a forecast of 10 quantity by going to change mode in rrp3 . Now when i run heuristics it is not even identifying this demand . But when i do CTM demand simulation it is picking this demand . why is heuristics not considering it .
Regards,
Nick

Hi Nick,
Are using any custom planning book or standard planning book snp94?
OK whatever it is, do you see the forecast quantity appear in the total demand key figure? I believe you do as CTM is planning for this demand.
So, heuristic should also plan for this demand. As per your comment.. "Now when i run heuristics it is not even identifying this demand . " Why do you think so? that Heuristic is not picking this demand? I mean you do see the demand in the total demand key figure in your planning book, right? And you are running heuristic interactively. Does the logs shows 'total no. of demand' as 'zero'?
If so you need to check your fore cast horizon. If your forecast falls within this period then it wont be considered as a part of the total demand. (But, again you said that CTM did plan for this forecast/demand).
Anyway check the t-lane for this product for the plant/dc/customer. There should be a valid t-lane. Then re-initialize your planning area and run the LC consistency check.
Now take your planning run (CTM/Heuristic).
Please do update us your findings.
Thanks,
Satyajit

Similar Messages

MRP not considering STO as demand

Hi,
When I run MRP, it is not considering the Storage location STO (SLOC to SLOC) as the demand.
here is the scenario in detial.
Material 1, MRP1 : MRP type V1 Reorder point 10, MRP 4 MRP indicator, SP proc key 20, Reorder point 50, Repl qty 25
STO created for 30. MRP run. ORD DS as -30 and available qty as 20. At this stage I expected a Pur req because the stock fell below reorder point
Material 2, MRP1 : MRP type PD Reorder point 0, MRP 4 MRP indicator, SP proc key 20, Reorder point 50, Repl qty 25
Same thing observed in this case also.
Bottom line STO (SLOC to SLOC) it is not considering as demand.
Please let me know the options that I have and what i am missing.
Thanks
Srini

The problem is solved.
I have made a change to the MRP type.
In the config, Under Additional requirements in Reorder point Planning, I have selected all the check boxes. For the current requirement, Order Reservation and Release Ord stock transfer are sufficient.
After transporting the values, It worked as expected. It considered, STO as well as reservations as demand.
PS: Initially it did not work after the transport. I went into the Material in the change mode and touched and saved it. It is working fine
Thanks
Srini

Open Purchase Orders not considered as requirement for MRP Run

Hi ,
We are facing a issue of Open Purchase orders not appeared in Stock requirements list and also it is not considered as requirement for MRP Run against reservation.
As aresult for a reservation demand of 10 units we are ending with Open POs 10 units and a additional planned order 10 units.
Material Type : ERSA
MRP Type : PD (or VB)
Lot size : EX ( HB if MRP Type is VB)
Could you please throw some light to correct our settings to MRP to consider Open POs?
Saravanan

Can you check to see if there is a re-order point set up for this materia? That could be causing the problem too.

Late Demand Fulfillment with SNP Heuristics

Hello all,
It is well known that SNP Heuristics does a bucket level planning and demands in each bucket are treated independent of the future bucket demands while creating the receipt elements. The receipts are created within the bucket unless there are sufficient receipts available in the past buckets that can be used.
Now, my question is, if we can force Heuristics to have the receipts in future buckets consumed with current bucket demand and not have to create additional receipts within the current bucket during planning run.
In a nut shell, can we influence heuristics not to plan receipts if there are fixed receipts available in future buckets?
Please note that settings like fixed pegging, maximum lateness of receipt, and late demand fulfillment do not work for heuristics. I have tested extensively using all of these settings.
Is there a way we can influence it to look into the future and if there are receipts available in any future bucket, say 30 days or 4 buckets ahead, in a weekly planning situation, it should not plan receipts in the current bucket and consume the receipts of future.
If any one has done such a thing earlier and can provide pointers, that will be grateful.
One option that came through discussions is changing standard macros to influence the way receipts are seen by heuristics during bucketed planning. Has someone explored this option? Please revert.
Thanks and warm regards,
Chandra

Hi Dieter,
Please check if the plan order is tied to your SO (t.code /SAPAPO/CTMVIEWER or in the /SAPAPO/RRP3). Also check in CTM profile (tab Supplies) what is your settings in the supply control section (Build Up Safety Stock and Stock is available). They should be active.
In the Planning Strategy tab what is the scheduling direction and pegging type?
Also check the Planning Strategy (planning mode & delete mode).
Thanks, Marius

Open items not considering in credit check.

Dear Experts,
We have implemented credit management in our new role out company code with the same credit controlling area for both company codes.
As per our configuration at the time of sales order creation, credit limit has to be checked and check the open items and oldest open items. It is working fine in old company code, but in new company code its not considering the open/old open items its only checking the credit exposure value. But the old company code its checking the credit exposure and open items and old open items.
In OVA8 we have configured the below way
selected the Dynamic check box - reaction C
selected the Cretical fields check box - reaction A
selected the Open items check box - reaction A
selected the OldestOpen items check box - reaction A
The above credit management is working fine in quality for both company codes, but in production its working fine only old company code.
I have already checked the all relevant configuration and requests, there is no issue in configuration.
Please let me know the possibilities for not considering the open items for credit check

Hello
You are absolutely right , the automatic credit control is at credit control Area level and not at company code level. Need to know few things from your end.
why business has not set up the new credit control area, when new company code has been configured. I think this would have made more sense .........
however its bit strange that sales recevables are not getting considered in the credit check, only in production ....... I think you need to keep your search on in SDN as well as try to search for any sap not in Service market .......
Once you get the answer; hope you update the thread ........
wish you luck in your search ......
Cheers
Big Screams ...........

System is not considering Planned Delivery time

Dear Gurus,
As iam planning for the month of January and running the MRP,schedulelines are getting generated but system is not condering Planned Delivery time maintained in the material master ie. 7days.Following is the example:
I have a FERT-X with a component A-1PC in its BOM and its planned delvery time from vendor is 7 Days.If iam running the MRP on 13/12/2010 for FERT-X 100 PCS for January1,2011 then the schedule lines are getting generated for for component A is on 01/01/2011.But PDT is maintianed in material master is 7 days and same has been maintianed in vendor inforecord.But system is not considering it.
Kindly help to resolve the issue.
With Regards.

I have one ROH which has two different vendors.
Two scheduling Agreemnt with target qty 100000 kg each.
Two different Vendor info record with Min. order qty maintained.V1-1000Kg,V2-6000Kg.
One source list with two vendors and with respective scheduling agreement.
Quota arrangement is there in which SOB is maintiained 50:50.
I hv the requirement of 3084 kg of ROH.
I run the MRP and two diiferent schedule lines are getting generated with 50:50 qty as mentioned in Quota arrangement.
Not considering the minimum order qty maintiained in vendor info record.
The above process is correct
Only One doubt In Quota Arrangement?
IS two schedule line is created after MRP run?
Generally System will select a vendor Whose Quota value is less
quota rating = quota base quantity + quota-allocated quantity/ quota
Edited by: Sundaresan . E. V on Dec 14, 2010 3:26 PM

Credit check not consider in case of expired Bank Gurantee

Dear Experts,
We are using credit control for Bank Guarantees also, when i have created bank Guarantees(through F-49)we are giving Expiry date for BG in Due field. It is working fine for credit check for customer.
But after expiry of BG also system considering BG amount for credit control, system suppose to not consider the BG amount since BG got already expired.
Why system taking consideration for expired BG's for credit check?
How to overcome the above issue?
Useful answer will be rewarded without fail.
Edited by: akdevavarapu on Feb 16, 2010 5:24 AM
Edited by: akdevavarapu on Feb 16, 2010 5:36 AM

Hi there,
If you want your system to check for the credit limit to be checked, go to transaction OVA8, select your combination of Credit control area, credit group and risk category and press details.
Set the field, No of days (released documents are still unchecked) to 0 or the days what u need.
For eg. if u set the date to 10, the credit check wont happen for the next 10 days from the last checking date.
So if u want ur system to check for credit once your BG expires, u have set the date to 0.
Thanks
Krish

Target sost calculation not considered Current cost estimate in KKBC_ORD

Hi All,
We have an case wherein it observed that target cost calculation on SFG is wrong
in KKBC_ORD where system does not considered the current cost estimate.
We have all the necessayry customisation in place for Target cost version 0 for current cost estimate.
Below is detailsed case.
1 Process Order created in Dec 2011
2 Price Released to Mat master on 01.01.2012
3 Goods movement,Operation confirmad Material Issues, FG qty delivered @ std cost 0n 04.01.2012
4 Order Technically completed (TECO)
5 KKS1/KKS2 will be done at month end.
We know that In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost on FG is not getting calculated,target cost will be updated only after calculating variance. it does
not calculate after delivery of finished goods, On Execution of KKS1/KKS2 variance will be calculated the target cost on FG and will be updated.
In process order (COR3 --> Cost analysis) Target cost ,Actual cost and Planned cost are calculated based on the following:
Total Plan Cost = Std Cost the material required to Produce X Planned Qty of the required material
Target Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Std Qty of material required to produce, for Produced Actual Qty
Actual Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Actual Qty of material consumed, for Produced Actual Qty
The variance is calculated on SFG and assemblies based on the difference between actual and target cost in KKBC_ORD. During creation of process order, the plan cost
will be updated with the valid standard cost upon the creation.
The target cost on SFG and Assemblies is only generated when there is good receipt from production order into inventory.
The target cost is generated using the valid / recent costing run for the correspondence SFG in KKBc_ORD.
All other target costs showed in COR3 (Menu Go to > Costs > Analysis) or KKBC_ORD before doing KKS1/2 is only statistical- However in our case Traget cost calculated
on SFG in KKBC_ORD not relevant with current cost estimate.
However Actual cost and Planned cost Calculated correctly.
Actual Cost= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
Planned cost= Std Cost the material required to Produce (6.572,12) X Planned Qty (12.415)= 81.592,87
However Target cost is not considering the current cost estimate;It should be - Current Standard cost of the materilal(5.624,88)X Target Qty(13.958,124)=78512.07.
But Errorneously Target cost is showing 67.383,59 which causing unfavorable variance to standard.
It should be 78512.07-77.021,48= 1490.59 favourable var to standard in KKBC_ORD.
Any help,suggestion and input would be highly appreciated.
Thanks with Regards
Subrata

hi
target cost is your standard cost* actual confirmed quantity, not the standard quantity required
the variance calculated will be always the actual debit to the production order- actual credit of the production order
your actual credit for the process order is std cost* actual quantity delivered to the inventory= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
actual debit to the process order is total actual cost which you can see in COR3 report .
By the way for which period you have calculated variance, target cost will be calculated based on that months standard cost
krishna

Blocked vendor master (Ordering address) not considered in PO

Hi Team,
Recently we have upgraded our system to ECC6 from 4.6. After upgrade,
the system is not considering the vendor master (Ordering Address) during
Purchase Order creation if it is blocked at purchase org level under
alternate data. Whereas it was picking in 4.6 system.
Kindly provide the reason for such behavior and provide the solution if
at all we want those blocked vendor codes to be considered.
Thanks.

Hi,
Please try below SAP note for the same
Note 1609717 - Vendors with blocked purch orgs are not replicated correctly
Note 1607331 - Unassign a vendor from its Organizational unit
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Rounding quantity field in scheduling agreement not considered in JITK

Hello ALL,
I would like to consult to you a scenario I am facing when it comes to creating a scheduling agreement (VA31) and maintaining a Rounding Quantity (field ABLFZ) in it.
When using the standard LZ type scheduling agremeent, the Rounding quantity is considered when creating a delivery in VL10.
However, when using the LZJ type of scheduling agreement, the Rounding quantity is NOT considered when creating a delivery in JITK.
Can you please tell me what causes the case in LZJ scheduling agreement?
Thank you all in advance.

Hi,
This field is not available for Scheduling Agreement. It is only available for Purchase Order.
Even you will not get this in Field selection also.

Scheduling agreement qty requirement is not considered in V_V2

Hi Friends,
We are facing a problem in rescheduling transaction V_V2. System is not considering the requirement of the confirmed schedule lines of the scheduling agreement while carrying out the ATP in V_V2 and the available qty is allocated to the sales orders.
Ex: Available Stock : 1000 EA
1. SA confirmed Qty: 1000
2. Sales order created for the qty of 1000, system is considering the SA requirement and confirming the SO based on RLT.
3. When we run ATP in sales order change, system is still considering the SA requirement and not changing the confirmed date.
4. But when we run the V_V2, system is ignoring the SA and confirming the SO line item with PULL-IN.
Because of this SO is stealing the stock reserved for the SA. Is there a way to change the behavior of V_V2 similar to VA02, which considers the SA requirement / confirmed qty while rescheduling.
Thanks,
Ram

Hi Ram,
Rescheduling of sales documents is item specific. It is not possible to reschedule individual schedule lines of scheduling
agreements. Each schedule line is displayed but only the open quantity can be rescheduled.
You can find further information in SDV03V02 documentation.
The open qty on item level will be checked becasue rescheduling of sales documents (scheduling agreements) is item specific.
Availability Check in Rescheduling is always on item-level.
Thanks and best regards,
Smile

FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Hi Frnds.
I have a typical problem.
Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
Let me know where the error lies.
Here is the scenario
00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        - 35518 - 35180 - 35332
03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04) - 15671 -   0     - 0
05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04) -    0    - 19401 - 0
05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    - 17719
INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

Hi Vivek
Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
I will give you full points.
Once again thanks a lot.
Regards
Krishna

Query not considering function based index in oracle 11g

I have a query which used Function Based Index when run in oracle 9i but when I run the same query
without any changes, it does not consider index. Below is the query:
SELECT distinct patient_role.domain_key, patient_role.patient_role_key,
patient_role.emergency_contact_name,
patient_role.emergency_contact_phone, patient_role.emergency_contact_note,
patient_role.emergency_contact_relation_id,
patient_role.financial_class_desc_id, no_known_allergies, patient_role.CREATED_BY,
patient_role.CREATED_TIMESTAMP,
patient_role.CREATED_TIMESTAMP_TZ, patient_role.UPDATED_BY, patient_role.UPDATED_TIMESTAMP,
patient_role.UPDATED_TIMESTAMP_TZ,
patient_role.discontinued_date
FROM encounter, patient_role
WHERE patient_role.patient_role_key = encounter.patient_role_key
AND UPPER(TRIM(leading :SYS_B_0 from encounter.account_number)) = UPPER(TRIM(leading :SYS_B_1 from
:SYS_B_2))
AND patient_role.discontinued_date IS null
AND encounter.discontinued_date IS null ;
Index definition:
CREATE INDEX "user1"."IX_TRIM_ACCOUNT_NUMBER" ON "user1."ENCOUNTER" (UPPER(TRIM(LEADING
'0' FROM "ACCOUNT_NUMBER")), "PATIENT_ROLE_KEY", "DOMAIN_KEY", "DISCONTINUED_DATE")
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "user1"
Database : Oracle 11g (11.2.0.3)
O/S : Linux 64 bit (the query does not consider index even on windows os)
Any suggestions?
-Onkar
Edited by: onkar.nath on Jul 2, 2012 3:32 PM

Onkar,
I don't appreciate you posting this question in several forums at the same time.
If I would know you also posted this on Asktom, I wouldn't even have bothered.
As to your 'issue':
First of all: somehow cursor_sharing MUST have been set to FORCE. Oracle is a predictable system, not a fruitmachine.
Your statement the '0' is replaced by a bind variable anyway is simply false. If you really believe it is not false, SUBMIT a SR.
But your real issue is not Oracle: it is your 'application', which is a mess anyway. Allowing for alphanumeric numbers is a really bad idea.
Right now you are already putting workaround on workaround on workaround on workaround.
Issue is the application: it is terminal., and you either need to kill it, or to replace it.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Open Items not considered for Payment Lot

Hello Experts.
I have created some open items using FPE1. They are displayed as due in FPL9. But the same open items are not selected in FP06 for clearing. They are also not considered for clearing in a payment lot (FP05).
Can some one tell me what could be the reason for this
Best Regards
Venkat

If you have a clearing restriction, to be able to remove it when you change the document in FPE2 for example you need to activate that clearing restriction in:
Financial Accounting > Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable > Basic Functions > Open Item Management > Define Modifiable Clearing Restrictions
If you don't do that you cannot manually change it.
Adriano.
PS: Again are people in these forums that put answers to be in the statistics... GOD..

SERVER IS NOT RESPONDING or IS NOT CONSIDERED SUITABLE. ......................... DC2 failed test Advertising Starting test: FrsEvent

Hi All,
I have the environment like DC1- 2k3 Service Pack 2 which is holding FSMO roles and now I build a new ADC DC2 – 2k8 R2 OS on different location (Subnet) . After completing ADC I run the DCDAIG on DC2 where I am getting below error
Not: I tried the configuration D4 and D2 for Burflag but no luck
Note: DC1 and DC2 both are on different location with different subnet.
Any suggestion or solution please
Doing primary tests
   Testing server: indai\DC2
      Starting test: Advertising
         Warning: DsGetDcName returned information for
         \\DC1.test.com, when we were trying to reach
         DC2.
         SERVER IS NOT RESPONDING or IS NOT CONSIDERED SUITABLE.
         ......................... DC2 failed test Advertising
      Starting test: FrsEvent
         There are warning or error events within the last 24 hours after the
         SYSVOL has been shared.
Failing SYSVOL replication problems may cause
         Group Policy problems.
Starting test: NCSecDesc
         Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
            Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
         access rights for the naming context:
         DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mh-man,DC=biz
         Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
            Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
         access rights for the naming context:
         DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=mh-man,DC=biz
         ......................... DC2 failed test NCSecDesc
      Starting test: NetLogons
         Unable to connect to the NETLOGON share! (\\DC2\netlogon)
         [DC2] An net use or LsaPolicy operation failed with error
         67, The network name cannot be found..
         ......................... DC2 failed test NetLogons
Starting test: SystemLog
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:40:54
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x00000032
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:40:54
            Event String:
            The time service detected a time difference of greater than 5000 milliseconds for 900 seconds. The time difference might be caused by synchronization with low-accuracy time sources or by suboptimal
network conditions. The time service is no longer synchronized and cannot provide the time to other clients or update the system clock. When a valid time stamp is received from a time service provider, the time service will correct itself.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:41:53
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:43:06
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:45:15
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:47:14
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:48:22
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:49:34
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:50:45
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:52:55
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000406
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:52:59
            Event String:
            The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to retrieve new Group Policy settings for this user or computer. Look in the details tab for error code and description. Windows will
automatically retry this operation at the next refresh cycle. Computers joined to the domain must have proper name resolution and network connectivity to a domain controller for discovery of new Group Policy objects and settings. An event will be logged when
Group Policy is successful.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:54:21
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:58:35
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:59:48
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:00:59
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:02:11
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:03:24
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:05:39
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:06:47
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x00000018
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:11:36
            Event String:
            Time Provider NtpClient: No valid response has been received from domain controller DC1.test.com after 8 attempts to contact it. This domain controller will be discarded as a time source and
NtpClient will attempt to discover a new domain controller from which to synchronize. The error was: The peer is unreachable.
         ......................... DC2 failed test SystemLog
Pradip Sisodiya

Hello,
please upload the following files so we could understand your setup:
ipconfig /all >c:\ipconfig.log [from each DC/DNS Server]
dcdiag /v /c /d /e /s:dcname >c:\dcdiag.log
repadmin /showrepl dc* /verbose /all /intersite >c:\repl.log ["dc* is a place holder for the starting name of the DCs if they all begin the same (if more then one DC exists)]
dnslint /ad /s "DCipaddress" (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321045)
ADREPLSTATUS
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30005 can also be exported to file.
As the output will become large, DON'T post them into the thread, please use Windows OneDrive (https://onedrive.live.com) [with open access!]
and add the link from it here. Also the /e in dcdiag scans the complete forest, so better run it on COB.
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
MVP, MCP, MCTS
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
Twitter:

Demand Not considered by Heuristics

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for