Dependent requirements not clearing up

Hi gurus,
I was wondering if someone could throw some light on this strange behavior. I tried to check all settings and it did not make any sense to me. we have a material A and material B. material A is the component in the BOM of Material B. We get sales orders for material B. I see in the document flow of sales order of material B that it was PGI'ed yesterday and we have MRP job NETCH that runs everynight. I do not understand why the MRP element with CUS ORD still shows up in MD04 for material B and as a result the dependent requirements also shows up for material A in MD04. what could be the problem. Oh and by the way we use strategy group of 52 on the material master for B.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Ravi

Hello Ravi
Take a look on the following documents that I wrote about the most frequent issues on MD04:
MD04: Problems with sales orders
Frequent issues on MD04
If the sales order itself is still displayed on MD04, you should try to run report SDRQCR21 to check for inconsistencies.
If the sales order itself is not displayed on MD04, but the sales order special stock is displayed on MD04, you should take a look on note 1723507.
If you still cannot solve the issue, please provide a screenshot of MD04.
BR
Caetano

Similar Messages

NPROC:Dependent requirement not getting generated

Hi Experts,
We have an issue wherein we have Depedent requirement for a HALB material against FERT material requirement.But, the MD04 screen of HALB material doesn't show any Dependent requirement.
Infact, the MD04 screen of the FERT material shows NROC in the MRP element data for the given period.
NROC: It means that there are some errorneous components which were created by doing GR before a GI.
I had tried executing MF47 transaction(which is COGI equivalanet in REM scenario) for clearing the errorneous components.But, i got the error as "Deficit of BA Unrestricted use". So,it means that it shall use my current stock for post processing the error componenets, which ideally shouldn't been the case as the stock was already consumed.
Then, i found out that the BOM of FERT was not maintained.
So,just wanna know that coz BOM of FERT is not maintained & the HALB needs to be defined as a component in the BOM of FERT in this case?
or any other solution is there so that Depedent requirement for the HALB material reflects in MD04 screen.
What we want: The recurring NPROC requirement which is coming for the year 2009, 2010 should permanently vanish from MD04 screen.
Thanks,
Rishi
Edited by: Rishi. N. Khanduri on Jan 28, 2010 3:08 PM

Harendra,
Are you using "NETPL" as processing key for MD02? After 3 or 4 days is the dependent requirment getting created automatically or is it after MRP run again?
Please provide more details,
Regards,
Prasobh

Dependent requirements not displayed for ROP

In reorder point planning, an entry is only created in the planning file and the net requirements calculation is only carried out if stock levels fall below the reorder point. To avoid overplanning, sales orders, dependent requirements, reservations and so on are not usually included in the net requirements calculation as these future requirements are already planned with the reorder level. However, to guarantee that the MRP controller is informed of current issues, the system displays sales orders, dependent and manual reservations and so on.
--- The question is in my case system is not displaying dependent requirements though they are only for information sake.
Can somebody throw a light on this?

Hello,
In reorder point planning, dependent requirements are neither displayed nor considered in the net requirements calculation. There are several helpful notes and a modification note available for this. Please take a look at the following SAP notes:
- 549752 question 3
- 550954 question 3
If you want to display the dependent requirements, please refer to note 37697 which contains a modification for that purpose.
I hope this helps!
Siobhan

MRP dependent requirements indicator

Hi,
Can anybody please let me know use of MRP dependent requirements indicator in MRP4 view?
Regards,
Samir Wadajkar

Dear,
You only use this indicator in connection with planning strategies for make-to-stock production, assembly planning. Note that the indicator Dependent requirements not relevant to MRP should only be used when, for example, planned independent requirements exist for an assembly.
EX... If you manufacture the chemical product say named ABC and you use water as component to manufacture it , and you dont want to plan the WATER quantity as it is used in bulk . So you can exclude the material water from the MRP run and only the Chemical product is planned and not the WATER.
Edited by: Girishprasad Subhash Pawar on Jun 24, 2010 9:13 AM

LTP run not creating Dependent Requirement

Hi,
I have created a LTP senairo and took the LTP Run through MS01. The planned order were created for the materials but the dependent requirements were not planned. In MS04 against the planned order I have an exception message 52 (No BOM selected) What can be a cause for this are there any specific settings to plan dependent materials through LTP? My requirement is that LTP should also show dependent requirements for the components.
Thanks!

Hi Özgen,
Thanks for the reply. I had entered the BOM selection ID but still it was not planning it. The problem was with the dates and when I pulled it in the planning Horizan it did plan it.. Even if there is not BOM selection ID maintained it will plan the dependent components which its doing in my case. Thanks for the reply though!
God Bless!
Regards,

Dont want dependent requirement after MRP

hi all
I dont want dependent requirement after MRP?
means A is a header material and B.C are the component
after MRP run system should be created requirement of component item.
so wht r setting required?
plz guide me

Hi,
First you ask how can you carry out settings not to get DepReq for your components than you say system should create requirements for your components.
Please give a clearer picture of your situation and make your question more clearer.
How do you procure your goods (if you do not use MRP)?
If you do not want DepReq for your goods you can:
- remove them from the BOM (use them as text item, use design BOM - I do not know your situatio)
- you can set the MRP type in material master as 'ND' (not planned) (MM02 > MRP1)
Please give more information.
Thanks,
Csaba

BOM Explosion/dependant requirements

Dear All,
I have a concern regarding the "MRP 4" view in MM.
BOM/Explosion
Individual / Collective requirements
"MRP 3" view
Availability Check
Availability Check (Daily / Individual)
I would like to know the effect of these settings clearly with an example please.
Thank you in advance

Hi,
1. The Individual Collective indicator 1/2 indicates how to club the dependent requirements either Individula Processing or Collective Processing.
This is generally used in MTO Scenario.
Here, For eg., you have 2 FERT Materials, in that 1 component say xyz is same.
If you want to club the requiremnts for for xyz for both the sales orders then you need to select 2.
By defult system will create PurReq for xyz as Sales Order/Customer Specific.
2. Now the Availability check:
Specifies whether and how the system checks availability and generates requirements for materials planning.
The availability check can be carried out in MRP for the depedendent requirements. This means that the availability check can directly check whether sufficient material is available for the production of the assembly. The availability check is initiated from planned order processing. It is not carried out automatically in the planning run for each requirement of an assembly.
Checking Group and Checking Rule clubbed together forms the Checking control..
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Siva

"Dependent Requirement"

Dear Gurus,
I am taking mrp run for variant material and dependent requirement is generated but not any purchase requisition is created for raw material. I have set collective requirement in mrp4 view and and i dont have stock for raw material. Please give some idea to solve this query.
Thanks and regards
Atul

Dear,
Are you using MD50 to run MRP?
For all the BOM components (up to last level) check in MRP 4 view of Material master
Individual / Collective - It should be Individual or Individual/Collective.
If is maintain as Collective then you will not get planing Proposals though MD50.
For all BOM headers Materials (FERT , HALB ) check in MRP 4 view for MRP for Dependent requirement should be maintain as Dependent requirement are Planned
Check the "Selection method" field in MRP4 view for the FG.
It should have values "Nil" or "1"
u2022If you select individual requirement then system will not consider available stock and generate Proposals for every single requirments.
Also you will find PR and Plan order with account assignment of Sales order (in case of MD50)
u2022If you select collective requirement then system will not generate planing proposals through MD50.In that case you have to go for individual MRP (MD02 / MD03 / MD41 / MD42).
Please input '2' in create pur.req. under MRP control parameters in Md02 screen.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Planned Independent Requirement Not getting displayed in MD04

Hi,
I am assigning material to nwa and doing advance procurement by using procurement type PIR. Reservation is getting created after release of activity but the same is not getting displayed in MD04.
The items of the reservation are getting displayed in MB23.
what could be the reason for this?
Regards,
B P Singh

Hi,
Planned Independent requirements (PI) are normally configured for consumption by 'Dependent' requirements. Hence the PIR would have been replaced by the reservation from 'dependent' requirement. You can test and verify the same in development system.
Regards
Murali

Dependent Requirements Planning

Hey Gurus,
I have a situation in which I have two materials that are planned with Independent requirements but also have dependent requirements against them. these two materials are 6001116 and 6001771. I have set the MIXED MRP indicator to "1", planning strategy "40" and MRP Dep. requirements as "1".
6001116 is not planning the dependent requirements and is only being planned by the independent requirements. 6001771 is planing both the dependent requiremnets and the independent requirements even though I have set the MRP Dep. requirements to "1". The only difference between these two materials is that 6001116, is a made in house product and the 6001771 is a purchased product.
I can't think if anything else that would control this to put me in this situation. Do you guys have any ideas for me or things that I should check to make sure that this is working correctly? I thought it was only the Dep requirements indicator that controlled the planning of independent reqs.

Dear,
You donot want dependent requirements
to be created" for your components when MRP is run
There are three Options:
First Option:
For the all respective components in MRP 4 view Input "1" for MRP Dep.Reqts
Second Option:
In the Basic Data 1 view maintain the X-Plant Matl Status maintain "01"(Blocked for Procurement/Whse)
Third option,
You can set the MRP type in material master as 'ND' (not planned) (MM02 > MRP1)
Then Planned orders/Purchase requistions will not be created for the components
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Can you check my final setup? Two things not clear yet

Hey guys,
Just when I thought I got it all figured out, something new (at least to me) pops up and raises more questions than answers. So I go on and search more and more and more and now finally I think i've got my setup allmost ready to order. Could you check it and help me out on the final insecurities? Thanx a bunch.
Oh and please, if you have a suggestions to change something I feel is allready o.k (so no questions)...make it a suggestion with enough info to let me make a choice in the matter. Give me a link to a Benchmarksite or e really good test. If the difference is minimal (seconds) on about 10 min. of final footage, than please don't send me on a chase again. My girlfriend would like me to bed with her at the same time now after a week or so
and    I want to order the damn.. stuff and start.
Camera:               Canon XF 100, uses Canon MPEG-2 4:2:2 50Mbps codec
Software:             Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.53
Motherboard:       ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
Question: not to much benchmarks around on the Z68 combined with I 2700. Anyone who uses this board with the 2700 or 2700K step forward please and elaborate.
Cpu:                     intel      core I7 2600
Memory:               16 Gb    Kingston ValueRAM (2x 8 GB : 2 x 4 GB - DIMM 240-pins - DDR3 - 1333 MHz
or
Cpu:                     intel      core I7 2600K
Memory:               16 Gb    Corsair Vengeance Blue 16GB DDR3-1600 CL9 quad kit
Question:               I think I’d go for the first option. It’s cheaper and from what I’ve read there not a lot to gain. My videos mostly don’t exceed 10                               minutes of final footage. Anyone can acknowledge this (or not)?
Videocard:           MSI        N570GTX-M2D12D5/OC
Harddisk:             OCZ       Vertex 3 120GB   (sata 600) for my OS
Harddisk:             S’sung WD Caviar Green WD20EARS x3 (sata 300)
To raid or not to raid is still not clear for me. 5 is definitely a no go
I’m thinking I’d put 2 disks in a Raid 0 for more speed and on a regular base BAckup to the other one( and eventually go for external back-up)
Is that ‘o.k. or mmh’, then fine. Is it a ‘oh no, what is he thinking’, please tell me.
Cooler:                Scythe Mugen                 2 Rev. B
Housing:              Cooler Master Xilencio
Powersupply:       Seasonic 620
Monitor:               Eizo       EV2333WH-BK
Optische drive:     LG          BH10LS30
Cardreader:          lexar     LEXAR PROFESSIONAL USB 3.0 DUAL-SLOT READER (for CF’s canoncamera)
Speakers              Creative              GigaWorks T20 Series II
Special :               Contour Design ShuttlePro2
Thanx guys and girls(?) for hopefully making my life easier. Greeting from Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Holland

Scott,
Referring to your post #8.
JCschild wrote:
i have proven this to be false....
This is a big concern to some of us end users who want to put our money where it counts.
Is there a clear benchmark varifying your actual test results, which us newbies can view?
Referring to your post #10 above.
they are also end users not system builders and do not have the resources/access we have to multiple platforms, processors ram etc.
How can we really know for sure if we go on word of mouth only, one swears by Ford, one swears by Chevy.
What should us newbies believe,
the feedback from end users who have the real world experience of the behaviour of their systems working regularly with large or complex projects, with strict timelines under time pressure, who cannot afford jerkiness nor delay of any kind, who must afford to save a lot of aggravation caused by less responsive systems, who cannot afford to be held back by hard disk failure or loss of data that took valuable time editing, who need lesser time requirements for regular backups, etc, who know what video editing involves in real practice,
or the feedback from system builders who have “the resources/access to multiple platforms, processors ram etc.” to run hardware tests, but who do not have the experience of high end video editing in practice?
Perhaps it is true that a video card running at PCIe-8x is not much slower than a video card running at PCIe-16x.
I don't know for sure.
What will happen if things change, sooner than we thought, with new drivers and CS6 PP utilizing the full bandwidth, and end users are stuck with systems that don't have the required PCI-e lanes to accomodate more than a 16 x PCI-e nVidia card?
It appears to me that the i7-2600K is indeed a great processor, delivering great value for money, for the majority of general-purpose applications, but
how does it perform when one works with large or complex projects, and multitask, such as having DW do a complete validation on multiple DHTML files, including SSE, running a resize action in PS on a couple of thousand images, encoding large files in FL and PR doing an export to a complex long form BRD?
I was very tempted, and came very close, to buying an i7-2600K for myself, but after learning just how much high-end video editing can demand from a system, I became hesitant to buy the i7-2600K with its platform. I need to be sure that the system I buy has no limitations for the work I need to do with it.
If Intel had video editing in mind when designing the i7-2600K, it would not have had integrated graphics, which is of no use when we need a nVidia card.
Regardless of the fact that according to http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i7-2600k-990x.html the i7-2600K outperformed many pricier products for a higher-end LGA1366 platform (even the $1000 i7-990X Extreme Edition yielding significantly to Core i7-2600K within the majority of general-purpose applications, except during video processing and transcoding, final rendering and a few specific tasks, such as encryption and batch image processing), Intel still positioned this processor as a mid-level processor, for a reason.
Intel knew before release what this mid-level i7-2600K was capable of, therefore releasing it positioned as a mid-level processor, they did so having the architecture to follow up with a mid-level processor that will outperform the i7-2600K, within the same price category, else who would buy Intel's next mid-level processors?
I suspect that for those who are willing to hold out and wait just a bit longer, so they can put their money where it counts, Intel has a pleasant surprise coming soon, and that the new platform will not be evolutionary like it has been for years, but revolutionary with feature improvements from Sandy Bridge like Intel's tri-gate transistor technology, PCI Express 3.0 support and Graphics DirectX 11 and OpenCL support, a bigger graphics performance and bigger CPU performance boost compared to Sandy Bridge.
what makes you think you need a raid controller.... the vast majority of Adobe users do not need one or an 8 drive raid array..
Yes, for those who never need a hardware raid controller, using it for general-purpose applications, the 2600K and its P67 or Z68 platform is nice.
The OP did not specify whether or not he will need a hardware controller, wherefore I cared to post my post #7 above,
nor did he specify his source material, editing style, the nature of his timelines and the time pressure he is under with his projects (other than a mention in his original post of his girlfriend's time request), or how long he intends to use the system before upgrading to the next one.
and why i finally posted the big cup of zip it thread.. to clear out some mis-leading comments.
Scott
ADK
Quoting from your original post in A big cup of "zip it" or the definative final P67 vs X58 answer thread :
Now in all fairless of disclosure the drive benchmarks dropped from our previous tests on X58 which is odd, we are guessing the video card as its ramping up would take bandwidth from the controller even though its supposed to be running 8x.
Scott
ADK
Since you wrote that “the direct replacement for X58 is X79” (System build for CS5.5. Contemplating whether or not to wait for Q1/Q2 2012.), I am eager to learn which exact motherboard(s) was/were used when you ran those previous tests on X58?
Supposing the video card took bandwidth from the controller, even though its supposed to be running 8x, why do you think it would do that as it's ramping up?
Is there a clear benchmark varifying your actual test results, which us newbies can view?

POSTING ERROR-MESSAGE POSTING BALANCE NOT CLEARED FOR THE PERIOD 2/2008A

Hi
I have a problem in payroll posting. While posting for one employee's persn number rejected and gave a message as Posting Balance not cleared for the period 2/2008A. To come out of the problem I changed the Payroll status record using pu03 changed the Erliest Retro date as 01.06.2008. Again tried to post but not posted again same Message displayed. After changing the Erliest Retro record I have not run the payroll for the particular employee. Is it required to run the payroll for the employee after changing the status in PU03. Request to guide on this
Thanks
EKP Yadav

Hi there
The posting may be out of balance for the employee because their credits dont equal their debits...
Do a test posting for the employee with the log on, this will tell you what amounts are being posted - and should give you an inidcation of where the balance is not cleared...
Yes, you would have to re-run the employee if you'd changed the retro date in PU03, but I dont think that will fix your posting problem....Should the employee have retroe'd?
From what I have seen, just changing the control record doesn't usually fix an out-of balance..there is usually another reason....eg wagetype incorrectly posting to the wrong number of accounts....or a missing wagetype on the employee (eg bank details...no /559 for the net pay to go to).
Cheers
Mary

Accounting document not cleared when billing document is cancelled.

Hi,
In ECC 6.0 when we cancel a billing document through vf11 in vfo3 we find the status as accounting document not cleared.
The general process is manually going to f-23 and clear customer line items of that invoice. After doing this the status become accounting documet is cleared.
My requirement is how to cancel the billing document without getting this message (accounting document not cleared) and not clearing the customer line items manually.
Can it be done through user exit/enhancement or by copying requirement vofm.
Please suggest.
Thanks
Edited by: sumesh on Jul 29, 2009 6:33 PM

They directly want the accounting document to
be cleared when billing document is cancelled.
Though you can achieve this with the help of ABAPer, why dont you consider having a Posting block for your billing type so that as and when the billing documents are generated, you can release it via VFX3 in bulk or VF02 for individual billing document release to FI.
In order to achieve this, go to VOFA, select your billing type and execute. There you can see a field "Posting block" where maintain a tick there and save. With this control, first of all, you can ensure that before releasing F2 billing documents to FI, it is not cancelled.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

I recently connected my new MBA to an ACER display using the appropriate Apple hardware to connect to a VGA port. The quality of the ACER display is poor- the image is not clear. How do I achieve the same clarity of picture as my MBA screen?

I recently connected my new MBA to an ACER display using the appropriate Apple hardware to connect to a VGA port. The quality of the ACER display is poor- the image is not clear. How do I achieve the same clarity of picture as my MBA screen?

Welcome to the Apple Community.
AirPlay Mirroring requires a second-generation Apple TV or later, OS X 10.8 or better and is supported on the following Mac models: iMac (Mid 2011 or newer), Mac mini (Mid 2011 or newer), MacBook Air (Mid 2011 or newer), and MacBook Pro (Early 2011 or newer).
On the basis of the specifications you have given for your set up, mirroring should work.

Payment run - should not clear the open item but should post payment doc

Hi Gurus,
Can you please help me , on how to acheive like when payment run F110 post the payment doc it should not close the open item rather keep that open item as open item , but hsould be be paid by payment doc posted through payment run F110.
Have any one of you had similar requirement ..? FICO gurus help me to acheiev this .. any exit /BADI ..or ideas..
Appreciate your help in advance

HI ,
Thanks for your reply , but still I am not clear on that.
reason they want to keep this open to be kept as open item , so that item will be picked up by dunning run ..
Basically the open invoice is being cleared by payment doc which was generated by payment run. If we look at BSEG in the open item record BSEG-AUGBL = will have the clearing doc number , and in addition to that BSEG will have created another record for the clearing doc as well .
May be since open invoice record is being updated with clearing doc (AUGBL ) , I belive its not shown up as open item .
Somehow this item should be kept as open item ... that is the req and also paid item payment reference should be transfered to Bill of exchange as well.
Hope you have clear background of my req...
Tnanks in advance ,

Dependent requirements not clearing up

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for