Deprecated Keyword?

It seems to me that the support for deprecation in the Java language could use a little help. As it stands, the compiler looks for the @deprecated JavaDoc tag to tell if a type, method, or field has been deprecated or not. If it is, it places a Deprecated attribute in the class file to indicate the deprecation. Does this seem a little weird to you? The compiler is taking information out of comments to create the class file! Shouldn't the comments be ingored completely by the compiler? I would suggest adding a "deprecated" keyword to the language as a modifier for types, methods, and fields. What do you guys think?

As for adding a keyword into the Java language, note
that deprecated is NOT a language feature, it is a
documentation feature.
Not sure that is the best way to express that. For example "@return" is a documentation feature. And 'deprecated', at least now is not part of the Java language. But it is certainly part of the JVM Spec, where other documentation features, like "@return" are not.
And that at least suggests that it is different than other documentation.
Deprecating a method in no way stops you from using it
however you should know that this method may not be
guaranteed to work in either this release or in future
releases of those classes.
Indeed, you can switch off deprecated warnings in your
compiler and be blissfully unaware of possible
problems.
Having the @deprecated attribute in JavaDoc is also a
polite reminder that you should document your code
properly, especially the API. Adding a keyword would
mean you not having that kind of incentive.All true, but could you explain how any of that is relevant to this post?

Similar Messages

Version specific list of deprecated ABAP keywords

Dear friends,
Can any of you provide some clue/link where I can find a list of deprecated/discontinued ABAP key words per version of SAP (4.7, ECC5, ECC6 etc.). I would really appreciate any help on this.
Regards
Nilay

Hi Nilay ,
Some of the obsolete statements are - -
ADD THEN UNTIL - IS OBSOLETE STATEMENT
ADD-CORRESPONDING - IS OBSOLETE
CONSTANTS IN 'CHANGING' PARAMETERS -
TYPE DECLARATION FOR PARAMETERS PASSED IN SUBROUTINES IS COMPULSORY
TYPE DECLARATION FOR FIELD-SYMBOLS IS MANDATORY
IN DESCRIBE STATEMENT, THE ADDITION IN BYTE/CHARACTER MODE MUST BE SPECIFIED
TABLES
Regards
Pinaki

ORA-22837: Relational hint or keyword is disallowed for user-level DML

I got ORA-22837 when i use stream .
I need some help!
thanks!
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE     11.1.0.7.0     Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> select * from dba_apply_parameters where apply_name='APP002';
APPLY_NAME PARAMETER VALUE SET_BY_USER
APP002 PARALLELISM 1 NO
APP002 STARTUP_SECONDS 0 NO
APP002 TRACE_LEVEL 0 NO
APP002 TIME_LIMIT INFINITE NO
APP002 TRANSACTION_LIMIT INFINITE NO
APP002 MAXIMUM_SCN INFINITE NO
APP002 WRITE_ALERT_LOG Y NO
APP002 DISABLE_ON_LIMIT N NO
APP002 DISABLE_ON_ERROR N YES
APP002 COMMIT_SERIALIZATION FULL NO
APP002 ALLOW_DUPLICATE_ROWS N NO
APP002 TXN_LCR_SPILL_THRESHOLD 10000 NO
APP002 PRESERVE_ENCRYPTION Y NO
APP002 RTRIM_ON_IMPLICIT_CONVERSION Y NO
14 rows selected
SQL>
SQL> select * from dba_apply;
APPLY_NAME QUEUE_NAME QUEUE_OWNER APPLY_CAPTURED RULE_SET_NAME RULE_SET_OWNER APPLY_USER APPLY_DATABASE_LINK APPLY_TAG DDL_HANDLER PRECOMMIT_HANDLER MESSAGE_HANDLER STATUS MAX_APPLIED_MESSAGE_NUMBER NEGATIVE_RULE_SET_NAME NEGATIVE_RULE_SET_OWNER STATUS_CHANGE_TIME ERROR_NUMBER ERROR_MESSAGE MESSAGE_DELIVERY_MODE
APP002 DESTQUEUE3 STRADM YES RULESET$_50 STRADM STRADM 00 ENABLED 2009-8-19 11:21:21 CAPTURED
SQL> select * from dba_apply_error;
APPLY_NAME QUEUE_NAME QUEUE_OWNER LOCAL_TRANSACTION_ID SOURCE_DATABASE SOURCE_TRANSACTION_ID SOURCE_COMMIT_SCN MESSAGE_NUMBER ERROR_NUMBER ERROR_MESSAGE RECIPIENT_ID RECIPIENT_NAME MESSAGE_COUNT ERROR_CREATION_TIME
APP002 DESTQUEUE3 STRADM 4.19.3785 NJORCL 5.22.8231 534128859 1 22837 ORA-22837: Relational hint or keyword is disallowed for user-level DML 129 STRADM 3 2009-8-19 10:46:42
ORA-06512: at "STRADM.COLA_DATA_HANDLER", line 42
ORA-06512: at line 1
APP002 DESTQUEUE3 STRADM 7.30.3817 NJORCL 3.16.8370 534132743 1 22837 ORA-22837: Relational hint or keyword is disallowed for user-level DML 129 STRADM 3 2009-8-19 11:04:42
ORA-06512: at "STRADM.COLA_DATA_HANDLER", line 42
ORA-06512: at line 1
APP002 DESTQUEUE3 STRADM 8.2.4944 NJORCL 1.32.6362 534133896 1 22837 ORA-22837: Relational hint or keyword is disallowed for user-level DML 129 STRADM 3 2009-8-19 11:07:44
ORA-06512: at "STRADM.COLA_DATA_HANDLER", line 42
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> exec dbms_apply_adm.execute_error(local_transaction_id => '5.3.5003');
begin dbms_apply_adm.execute_error(local_transaction_id => '5.3.5003'); end;
ORA-22837: Relational hint or keyword is disallowed for user-level DML
ORA-06512: 在 "STRADM.COLA_DATA_HANDLER", line 42
ORA-06512: 在 line 1
ORA-06512: 在 "SYS.DBMS_APPLY_ERROR", line 151
ORA-06512: 在 "SYS.DBMS_APPLY_ERROR", line 265
ORA-06512: 在 "SYS.DBMS_APPLY_ADM", line 467
ORA-06512: 在 line 1

Following parameters are deprecated in release 10.2.
LOGMNR_MAX_PERSISTENT_SESSIONS
MAX_COMMIT_PROPAGATION_DELAY
REMOTE_ARCHIVE_ENABLE
SERIAL_REUSE
SQL_TRACE
Check this in your parameter file.
As per Oracle Errors Documents.
Error : ORA-32004
Cause:     One or more obsolete and/or parameters were specified in the
     SPFILE or the PFILE on the server side.
Action:     See alert log for a list of parameters that are obsolete. or
     deprecated. Remove them from the SPFILE or the server side PFILE
Regards,
Sabdar Syed.

Keywords, what is more important search engines

Which is more important for search engines: keywords in meta
tags, words in
title pages, words in alt tags, text on page.
I thought I had read that keywords in meta tags was being
deprecated but I
could be wrong.

That's ImageGalleryMagic from the wizards at PVII.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"twocans" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hi yea Murray,
> What extension did you use for the pics gallery is that
one of p7s, I was
> amazed to see the larger pic only load when the
thumbnail was clicked.
>
> regards
>
> kenny
>
>
>
>
> "Murray *ACE*" <[email protected]>
wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> The major search engines are said to ignore keyword
meta tags. I can't
>> tell you for certain that they do, but I can tell
you this: a site I
>> brought live in April is now #1 (out of 12,300,000
hits) in Google for -
>>
>> wild horse image
>>
>> a search phrase that would seem pretty generic, and
the linked page
>> doesn't have any keywords (in fact, none of the
pages on the site do)....
>>
>> www.wildimages.biz/wi_gallery-wild-horses.shtml
>>
>> The pages are well coded (if I do say so myself)
with extensive use of
>> title, <h#> tags, linked filenames, and good
keyword density in the
>> content. I believe that those are the important
things in ranking
>> sites....
>>
>> --
>> Murray --- ICQ 71997575
>> Adobe Community Expert
>> (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do
so!)
>> ==================
>>
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
>>
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
>>
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
>>
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
>> ==================
>>
>>
>> "Doc" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Which is more important for search engines:
keywords in meta tags, words
>>> in title pages, words in alt tags, text on page.
>>> I thought I had read that keywords in meta tags
was being deprecated
>>> but I could be wrong.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Easy way to add a single keyword to an image?

I just organized a bunch of photos I took at a birthday party, and ran into some awkwardness when keywording. Hopefully it's just user ignorance, but if not, maybe someone can offer a workaround. I did the import with no keywords, because I wasn't thinking. Once I'd done that, I selected all images in the "Last Import", hit Ctrl-K, and typed Birthday (which is one of my standard keywords). Then I deselected all images and started doing selective keywording. That's where it started getting awkward. I had several shots that had my son in them, so I selected all of them and hit Ctrl-K. This put my cursor in the keyword box in the right-side panel, with Birthday highlighted. I hit <End>, then typed comma and MySonsName. No problem so far. I delselected the shots and selected the ones that had my daughter in them. The right-side keyword panel now showed something like "Birthday*, MySonsName*". I wasn't sure whether I could just add MyDaughtersName to the images without actually adding MySonsName to all selected images (even those without my son in them). That's the awkward part. What I found was that in order to add a single keyword to a bunch of images at once, I had to enable Keyword Stamping and use that. An alternative was to "Set Keyword Shortcut", enter the keyword, select the images I wanted, and then use "K" to add the shortcutted keyword to the images. Is there any way to simply say "add this keyword to all selected images" in one atomic action? In other words, hit a keystroke, type the keyword, hit Enter, and it's now applied to all selected images. -- Rob Freundlich "Males ae biologically driven to go out and hunt giraffes." - Newt Gingrich "Some folks you don't have to satirize, you just quote 'em." - Tom Paxton

<[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected].. > In the right hand keyword pane the list should show something like "birthday, > *sonsname". The * means that the keyword isn't >applied to all the images. > > To add your daughter's name to the selected images, just add it to the end of > the list and press return. As long as you don't >remove the * you won't apply your son's name to all the images. if you do >remove the *, then you will. Sweet. I'm a programmer, so I thought the * meant multiple images, not "not all images", so I didn't even think of trying that. Works like a charm, though. Thanks! -- Rob Freundlich "Males ae biologically driven to go out and hunt giraffes." - Newt Gingrich "Some folks you don't have to satirize, you just quote 'em." - Tom Paxton

Lightroom Upgrade at a client - sucess? - keyword problem deal breaker

Hi
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went.
Background: The client is a professional photographer specialized on garden photography. Her customers are gardening and lifestyle magazines who publish her photos regularly as illustrations to various articles. She has a professional Canon EOS 1Ds MK III equipment and shoots exclusively raw. In a shoot around 300 to 1000 images are shot. The Lightroom catalog has around 20,000 images currently.
In Lightroom she uses mostly DAM and some basic development features, images are delivered either as raw of as JPEG images to the clients. Keywording is especially important. She has an extensive hierarchical list of plants most of them multiword keywords with spaces, and lots of other keywords indicating if images were sent to clients and other stuff.
The upgrade went just very well. I exported the catalog to a new intermediate catalog without previews, installed LR3 and imported this intermediate catalog into LR3 generating new previews from scratch. The hardware is modest, and some functional tests (especially switching images in develop, spot tool, and adjustment brushes) revealed that everything performs well enough.
Then she asked me where she would have benefits from using the new version. And then I told the whole benefit story, which can be read everywhere.
- New process version, better details and noise reduction. She asked where she can see it? Hmm, I switched to 1:1 view changing the process versions, not really much to see on Canon 1Ds Mk III files. Even with noisier files, it was hard to tell, what has actually changed. So only a 4:1 view very tiny changes were visible. The impact on her business? Near to nothing as she does not print large. The differences would hardly be seen in the magazine prints.
- Lens corrections and perspective control: does not really matter in garden photography, but she could see some occasional usefullness.
- Publish services: no real need for it
- Print packages: nope
- Slightshow improvements: no use for it
- Performance improvements: nothing visible
- Effects: completely superfluous
- New import dialog: at first glance a hindereance, as she has to get used to it
Then she asked: did they correct the keyword handling, when entering keywords witrh spaces? (You know the nasty bug, where keyword completion is broken at keywords with spaces). We checked (I knew it wasn't fixed), and of course she was heavily disappointed. Thus, after 2 years of development nothing new for her, keyword bug not fixed? Of course she said, that I should tell her, when keyword completion works, then and only then would she consider an upgrade.
So, despite all the bells and whistles about the new version, I doubt that for many photographers the benefits are really so overwhelming in the real world. It is a pitty that Adobe continues to neglect the DAM features (some fresh ideas for client management would be great), that existing features aren't consequently implemented (esp. the possibilities to query the catalog, and keywording), and that existing bugs are constantly ignored and not fixed.
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend useless. Please listen!
Disclaimer: As I am not a professional for me the situation is not the same. I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher, who needs a proper asset management. I recommended Lightroom to her because of the overall package (she moved from Cumulus), so I feel a little obliged to help her in this issue. In my case, as a user of a modest Lumix G camera system, I would consider the IQ benefits more signifcant. I don't know, if this is a general observation.
Kind regards
Thomas

W.W. Webster wrote:
tgutgu wrote:
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went ...
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend (sic) useless. Please listen!
I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher (sic), who needs a (sic) proper asset management.
So the over-riding conclusion from your experience with just one photographer is that Lightroom is 'useless', and this compels you to demand, in bold type, that Adobe must listen?
That Lightroom has issues and areas for ongoing development is obvious, and Adobe won't dispute this. But rants like yours add nothing and are unhelpful. Julie's response is extremely tactful and far more moderate than your post deserves.
Dear Mr. Webster
I think when you post, you should definitely change your tone. Julie simply answered my original post by acknowledging the problem, your accusation that I did not use appropriate "netiquette" is ridiculous. Posts like yours are a real problem of this forum.
I simply gave a user story example to show that not for everybody the shiny advertised new features provide real benefits and that paying attention to a thorough implementation of features can be equally important. I think Julie has recognized this. And the issue is nothing for ongoing developments. Lightroom supports keywords with spaces, so it has to be done consequently. Keywording is essential for DAM. If keywording gets too tedious or leads to wrong keyword assignments, then DAM is really pointless.
The intention of my post was to point Adobe to an apparently small problem, which has quite a big impact to people, who depend on good DAM features. The issue is nothing new, existed since the first release of Lightroom, but nothing was done about it, unfortunately. Now that Lightroom addressed keywords with spaces even with a new preference setting, it was fair to assume, that they had done something about it with care. This isn't so obviously. The issue was discussed in previous threads, but did not get any visible notice from Adobe. I am glad that this has changed now with Julie's post.
In no way did I say that Lightroom is useless or even that I regard it to be so. I merely said that the catalog concept is to a great extend (not completely) useless, if its implementation is sloppy. DAM starts with data entry and only after doing this, you can use it to your benefit. Therefore it has to be efficient, which currently is not. Lightroom is criticized by a large number of users that it is forcing them into a catalog system instead of just providing access to the file system. Long existing bugs like this, likely proves them right in their view.
The competition (I mean complete workflow solutions) is not really better than Lightroom with respect to DAM features, however, my take is, that the developers should be equally ambitious with the quality of the catalog system as they are with IQ, especially if the achievements in IQ are apparently less relevant to owners of high end camera systems. (I could be wrong with the last statement, but it would be interesting to hear if others have similar observations).
Kind regards
Thomas
Thomas

Does Bridge only Filter/Search Keywords in one folder at a time?

It seems the "Filter" feature in CS6 Bridge will only search keywords in a single opened folder. What if I have multiple folders for image downloads, one per day, in a parent folder for the month, or even a year? Can I use Bridge to filter images in a folder containing other folders?
If not, is there another search strategy I can use to quickly filter images in multiple folders? Thanks.

You can select a root folder, and then select Show Items from Subfolders from the View menu. That adds all contained files to the Content panel, from which you can filter.
If you need more control, you can use Find instead, where you can also do AND/OR operations too, but takes a little more patience.

How can I integrate metadata and keywords in Lightroom with those in Photoshop, Bridge, and Photoshop Elements? In other words, is there a way to retrieve common metadata templates from all modules? Thanks!

Keyword and Metadata Integration throughout Adobe Modules

Thanks! That's helpful.
What I mean by "common metadata", is a unified, updated, most current metadata, which I could update in each program. That is without overwriting the metadata, but appending new keywords to the metadata I created in the previous program.
I use Bridge, then Lightroom and finally Photoshop. That's the regular workflow: Bridge for preliminary sorting and and adding some keywords; Lightroom for organizing and picking the best images; finally, Photoshop for processing. I got Photoshop Elements on trial. Doesn't work for my purposes.
I need to share and update the metadata / keywords when I go from one program into another. Can't retrieve metadata I set up in Bridge into Lightroom. Same happens with Photoshop, where I can't retrieve keywords I add in Lightroom. It's tedious to write up the keywords again.
Thanks for your efforts!

Using iPhote Keywords with PS Elements and visa-versa

Howdy,
Does anyone know if you can xfer (import/export) iPhoto keywords to PS Elements 4 or Photo Bridge and visa-versa?
Or do you have to create a new Keyword list with Photo Bridge and PS Elements 4

MV:
You can use iView MediaPro in the Demo mode to catalog your iPhoto LIbrary and then sync (write) the keywords back to the original file. That will permit other applications to read those annotations in the source file. Check out Tutorial #1 here. The methodology is there to do what you want even though it's geared for a different issue.
G5 Dual Core 2G, 2G RAM, 22 Display, 250G HD, 250G FW HD, QT 7.0.4P Mac OS X (10.4.5) Canon S400, i850 & LIDE 50, Epson R200, 2G Nano

In Adobe Bridge, how can I display keywords in their hierarchy, do an "aka" keyword assignment, and perform multi-value keyword searches?

Hi Bridge Geniuses!
I need your help. I am using Bridge to sort and keyword a pretty big photo archive. I have created a pretty long nested hierarchy (4 layers deep, max) and, for a few reasons, would like the parent tags to be automatically included when I indicate a sub-tag. The problem I have now is that the keyword list is distractingly long and organized alphabetically. My first question is this: is there a preference setting in Bridge that will ask the program to display the keywords in their hierarchy? That is, will Bridge present the list as, for example, cars à hybrids à Toyotas à Prius.
My second question is: if I have two or more names that represent the same keyword, is there an “aka” function in this program that will allow me to direct searches for two or more different words to the same keyword entry? (For example, if I want my searches for “Bruce Wayne” to also show entries marked as “Batman.”)
Finally, I would like to know if Bridge will perform keyword searches for more than one word at a time. So far, I have tried entering two keywords with overlap at a time, separated by a space or a comma or a semicolon, and the search comes up empty.
Thank you very much for your help!

I reset my custom workspace and all seems to be well now. My keywords now show, the number of photos each applies to and I can again search.
Thank you.

Images not displaying at their normal size, and not all keywords displaying, why?

Not sure what's going on inside Adobe Bridge CC 2014.1, but why is it that my images are not displaying at full size. Bridge says they're displaying at 100% but I know that's not the case, because when I open the same images in Mac OS Preview (OS 10.10.1 Yosemite) at 100% they're much bigger. Is there a viewing preference setting I'm missing?
Also, I use Bridge and Photoshop on two mac pro desktops: one at my office and one at home.
At work, I created more than 30 keywords in Bridge for several hundred images that reside on my external thunderbolt hard drive. But when I take that hard drive home and connected it to my home mac and then open Bridge, only a handful of keywords appear. I don't see the full list of keywords that I created at work. But in Bridge, I didn't see any option to save or export keywords as a file.
Although the image metadata does appear, because whatever keyword i assigned to an image at work does display on the home mac, I just don't see the entire keyword list.
Can or should Bridge therefore only be used on one computer? Is it not possible to transfer the entire Bridge keyword list from one mac to another?
Thanks in advance for any help feedback with this.

Hi Zenos,
I've discovered what is causing the problem, but I still need a way to fix it, if possible.
The cause of the problem is that in Windows 7 Control Panel > Display I have set the size of "text and other items" to 150% (otherwise everything is much too small too read on my screen's recommended resolution of 1920×1080).
I discovered that Irfan Viewer was also displaying at the incorrect resolution, but I managed to solve that problem by right-clicking on the IrfanView.exe icon and following Properties > Compatibility and selecting "Disable display scaling on high DPI settings".
I tried the same procedure with Thunderbird, but it made no difference. It is still displaying at the incorrect resolution.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Catsix

Keywords in Adobe Bridge CC and Lightroom 5 not working

I recently upgraded to Adobe CC. We use Bridge and Lightroom regularly to tether while shooting, batch process and search for images. I have noticed that files I have keyworded in Bridge will randomly lose the keywords attributed with them. When we shoot tethered to lightroom we will keyword as we shoot but those keywords do not show up in Bridge. This is a huge issue for us. We have thousands of images and plan on using bridge as a tool for our designers and marketing team to search seamlessly for photos based on keywords. If they are randomly disappearing or not carrying through from Lightroom to Bridge it becomes completely unmanageable and completely out of our hands. And a completely useless tool. Any suggestions?

Keyword list in Adobe system, bridge and lightroom, need standardizing. That's what I feel.

Keyword selection function in Adobe Bridge CS3

Hello,
Does anybody know if and how I can change the "selection criteria" of keywords in Adobe Bridge CS3?
-> selection criteria: If I want to use the filter with the keywords, it selects the images which include any of the selected keywords (OR-function), but I would like to select only those images which have all of the selected keywords(AND-function).
Example: In a holiday folder named "italy", I want to see all pictures with the keywords "beach" and "me". What I get are all the "beach" images and all the "me" images. How can I change this?
Would be great if someone could help me...!
Thanks!

In the Find box the Match drop down has 2 options. "If all criteria is met" is like "and" while "if any criteria met" is like "or" logic.

Display keywords in full screen?

I know you can see the attached keywords for specific fotos in the right panel, but is there a way to see them when you are in full screen mode. PSE allowed you to r-click and get "remove keyword" which functioned to tell you what keywords were attached to any given foto.
is there any way to make the keywords visible in a similar workaround in LR3 or more straight forward way in LR3. it would be great if keywords were one of the options for r-click or as one of the library view options. any suggestions out there?

thanks i just did:
please add "remove keyword" to the r-click options in lightroom. it is
available in PSE and not only shows what keywords are attached to a
given foto , but also gives
the option to edit the keyword list without scrolling through dozens of
nested keywords in the panel. i have 20,000+ images accumulated over
decades and my keywording system has evolved over that time, making
editing essential. the current options are clunky.
terry

I can not see "Keyword" detail

Hello I have got a problem with Windows Explorer and it is
because of Adobe Flash product.
I added keywords to some files with right click in every
file, then properties, Summary and in the field Keyword I wrote
some data.
Then in Windows Explorer in the Folder that contains those
files, I go to View menu and select Choose details, I activate the
Checkbox "Keyword" to view that field in the Details View, but when
I list the files in the Windows explorer under Details View, the
details fields of name, type, size, date modified and keyword
appear but the data I added before to keyword does not appear under
the keyword field in the view of Windows Explorer, the field of
keyword is empty.
I Know this issue is related with MAcromedia Flash because
the checkbox "Keyword" does not appear if I have not installed
Macromedia Flash, it means Native Windows do not have this field,
and that this field is added by Macromedia Flash but it does not
work properly because it does not show the data under its field in
Windows Explorer.
I really appreciate your help
Thank you

Hope it helps
* fact: Oracle Network Manager
* fact: Net8 Assistant
* fact: Advanced Security Option (ASO)
* symptom: No Advanced Security tab
* symptom: ASO product has been installed
* cause: The file $ORACLE_HOME/network/tools/NetProperties does not include 'ANO' or 'ASO' in the INSTALLEDCOMPONENTS parameter.
fix:
- Make sure the Advanced Security Option (ASO) is installed by clicking
the 'Installed Products' button in Oracle Universal Installer.
- Check the file 'NetProperties' in $ORACLE_HOME/network/tools:
The parameter INSTALLEDCOMPONENTS should include the value 'ANO' or 'ASO'.
Example:
INSTALLEDCOMPONENTS=CLIENT,NET8,JAVAVM,SERVER,ANO
If neither value 'ANO' nor 'ASO' is present, add it to the list.
- Alternatively Comment out this parameter completely by placing a "#"
at the front of the line.

Deprecated Keyword?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for