Depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code
Dear Expert,
Would like to seek for help, when I run a customize report (AUC without PO not yet capitalized report the system prompt the error depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code only on the march 2011 on ward but before march 2011 the report is able to display as usual.
Between., does SAP have the standard report to list the asset which is AUC and not yet capitalized?
My version of SAP is ECC 6.0.
Kindly advise.
Regards,
Karen
Hi,
Thank you for the prompt reply, why the system prompt the error depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code only on the march 2011 on ward but before march 2011 the report is able to display as usual?
Please help.
Regards,
Karen
Similar Messages
-
Depreciation posting rules are not defined for area 00 in Company Code.
Dear expert,
Would like to seek for advice why the SAP report trigger this error and what could be cause this error is promt out.
Please advice.
Many thanks
KHDear:
This error appears when system does not find the rules that how to post deprecation. Please check whether you have defined dep posting rules in OAYR for your depreciation area in co code . It determines that how your depreciation will be calculated , monthly , by monthly , yearly e.t.c. Hope it will resolve your query.
Regards -
Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax
Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcomeThe payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support -
Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR
Dear SAP Gurrus,
I am facing a problem while making payment against invoice, receiving payment against invoice, clearing advance payment and advance receipts through T-code F-53, F-28, F-44 and F-32. System is allowing me to select the invoices against which I want to do the clearing but when I go for simulation I am getting the following error -
' Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR'.
When I click on the error message the performance assistant gives methe following details:
Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16145110 currency INR
Message no. F5062
Diagnosis
The accounts for posting the exchange rate differences could not be determined. For the specified G/L account and the specified currency key, no corresponding exchange rate difference accounts were determined.
System Response
The system cannot generate the exchange rate difference posting.
Procedure
By pressing ENTER, you achieve that the document is reset to a status without automatic posting. In another window, you can complete the default settings for exchange rate differences and post the document afterwards.
Proceed
My client is local. Even the local currency is set to 'INR'. There is no foreign currency involced while making invoices, payment and receitps. Eventhough the system is giving me error. As a result I am not able to clear open items. Please give me some feasible solution so that I can clear the open items.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Shreyas Wanihi,
As you said, you are not maintaining any Exchange rate differences, It may not be required a Exch rate Diffrences account.
Please check whether you have created any Group / Parrallel curencies etc in co.code level.
Please go through the notes 209580 / 89531, hope it helps you.
Regards
Kanna -
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome !
TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding taxHi,
On the analysis, the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
code as XX.
The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
BSEG-QSSKZ with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
tax.
As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
database information.
Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
This should resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa. -
Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders
Hi All,
when i convert the planned order to production order i got this massage popup coming Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders . please let me know this .Hi,
One of major customization steps for the order type is missing. Run OPU3 and maintain settings for the order type you are using. You may copy settings from an older type.
Regards. -
Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 13100100 currency INR
We are facing issues with doing BRS and getting the following message,
Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 13100100 currency INR
We have tried all possible steps mentioned on SCN,please note the acoount mentioned above does not have the open item management.
Assigned GL accounts on transaction DSA-Difference arising on G/L acct clearing.Hi ,
THis question has been Asked and answered lot of time .
Can you Please go to OB09 and define your GL account to solve this problem
Many Thanks -
Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16138579 currency INR
The following message is coming,while trying to clear vendor account of capital services.Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16138579 currency INR
Please help us to resolve the issue.Hello Kishore,
Use TCode: OB09 and maintain FX determination account for G/L account 16138579. In case you have local currency 2 then you will also need to maintain FX determination see below example:
Additional setting in case you have local currency 2 -
Error: "posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant" in FBICS3
Hi,
I got error "posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant" when I execute t code FBICS3.
I checked in OB29 & t code FBIC010 & noted that the fiscal year variant had ben maintained.
Please advice.HI,
It was noted that the mentioned t code had been maintain but below mentioned error appear:
Posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant
Message no. GU506
Diagnosis
You have tried to determine a posting date in fiscal year variant for period , fiscal year , but this period is not defined for the variant.
Procedure
You maintain fiscal year variants in table T009.
It was referring to t code OB29. I have checked the detail, in OB29 also details maintain.
Please advice why the error still prompt. -
Posting is not possible for the specified company code.
Hi SRM Gurus,
We have a four company codes in our org.structure and if we try to post manual invoice for a particular company code with its currency, we are getting this error :
"Posting is not possible for the specified company code "
We have all company codes defined and inherited for the particular user in BUK and we get all the company codes in the F4 help of this user in BBPIV02 -->Basic data.
Any suggestions pl.
I doubt this particular Cocode is deactivated for invoice posting in backend. Is it possible ?
Kindly suggest.
Reg.,
Sridhar.Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
Are you getting this error for a praticular company code only or for all the comapny codes ?
<b>Please read this -></b>
Since you are trying to create Invoice with PO did you check the Vendor Root there is a attribute for company code. Please maintain the same, if not maintained.
Refer the link below for details.
Re: Company code for system missing in user attributes
<u>Other related links -></u>
Try to change the chart of acct info in OBY6 for a company code that was copied from SAP template, there is no Financial posting or any other posting in this company code.
Re: Posting Period Error in Confirmation
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul -
ARE 1 update error excise modvat account not defined for ARE 1
Hello Expert,
Iu2019m trying to update ARE 1 Document in export scenario, but it shows error -
Excise modvat accounts not defined for ARE1 transaction and K5 excise group
Message no. 8I402
Iu2019ve gone thru Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction in CIN. But exactly in which field we need to maintain the GL.
thanks
GKumarHI,
You are not giving correct Excise inovice no. in J1IH transaction for cancelling. Because if correct excise invoice number is not given then also system give the same error. So please check the excise invoice number carefully
Please check SPRO => Logistic General => Taxes on Goods movement => India => Outgoing Documents => Specify Default Excise Group and Series Group, whether you have assigned the related G/L Account for the given combination with Excise Invoice Type
You will Check following G/L are maintained or not in "Specify G/L account per excise Transaction"
maintain GL account for ETT ARE1 in table J_1IEXCACC for field Mod.Clearing field name is J_1ICLEAR
Cenvat Suspanse G/L
RG23A BED
RG23A ECS
RG23A AT1
Also Check following under "Specify Excise account per excise Transaction"
CEIV CR Credit MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
CEIV DR Debit PLAAED PLA AED account
CEIV DR Debit PLAAT1 PLA AT1 Account
CEIV DR Debit PLABED PLA BED account
CEIV DR Debit PLAECS PLA ECS Account
CEIV DR Debit PLASED PLA SED account
CEIV DR Debit RG23AED RG 23 AED account
CEIV DR Debit RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
CEIV DR Debit RG23BED RG 23 BED account
CEIV DR Debit RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
CEIV DR Debit RG23SED RG 23 SED account
Thanks,
Raviteja
Edited by: Ravi Teja.T on Feb 2, 2012 9:55 AM -
TAX code is not working for a specific company code
Hi Friends,
One tax code is giving error messa ge that it is not maintained in tax procedure, when iam using the same code for another company code it is working fine.
Please help me, points are assured.
Thanks.
SriniHi Srini,
The tax codes are defined at the country level. Please check whether the company codes belong to the same country. If not ensure that the tax code is maintained in the tax procedures of the respective countries.
You can check the assignment of the tax procedure to a country in the TCode OBBG.
please reward points if helpful.
Regards,
Sreekanth.... -
Hello frnds,
I am trying to create a customer in XD01 but it gives me an error stating "SAles area not defined for customer.......I have maintained SAles area properly in IMG but cant figur eout the reason for this error.
Please assist
Regards
maddyHi
Go and check at SPRO -- SD -- Master Data -- assign common dist channel and Division...
you will have assigned some dist channel and division opposite to your distr channel and division...
Change the same to your own....
Example
You have to do like this for both dist channel and division
S.org dist channel ref for master data ref for condition
1000 10 10 10
Muthupandiyan -
Goods Issue error - batches not defined for delivery item
Hi,
We are getting a Goods Issue error u201CThe batches are not defined for delivery item 000010u201D. We are only getting this error for a material that is being shipped against a particular third party sales scheduling agreement. We went live in 2007 and we had no issues, but when we had to create a new Sched Agreement this year, for third party sales, we started to get this error. However, if we re-activate the old scheduling agreement we do not get the error. We have a batch job that executes the following steps:
1. VL06IG (collective goods receipt)
2. VL10 (collective delivery)
3. VL06O (collective GI)
We have compared the 2 scheduling agreements and see no difference. We are assuming it has something to do with how the scheduling agreement was setup, but are not sure. Any suggestions on how to correct this problem would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
HelenDear Murali,
The material has not changed at all. I'm not sure what you mean by maintaining batches while receipt of the material.
If I re-open the old scheduling agreement, we do not get the error message. However, as soon as we use the new SD scheduling agreement, we get the error. We are using the same material master on both scheduling agreements.
Thanks,
Helen -
Postings for account type M ( posting key 99 ) are not defined
Hi,
I am trying to post vendor credit memo KG through FB01 using posting key 21 - Debit Vendor and posting key 99 - Credit Material.
I am getting the error "Postings for account type M ( posting key 99 ) are not defined Message F5204".
The posting key 99 is set for account type material. Is there anything else that need to be configured?
Is there any other way that i can debit a vendor and credit material through FI postings (without purchase order)
Thanks
SukumarHi Ravi,
I am also having the same issue.
I want to load some costs to materials thorugh Finance module. In that case i am trying to post the values through F-43 document.
In posting key 89, but system not accepted. As per your suggestion i am trying to take 81 posting key. Then system is asking the GL, there is i select the Stock GL, system won't allow to post the values to the stock account.
So what will be the solution to add or to deduct any other charges to the material cost through finance module.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I just downloaded more ichat effects and my ichat will not open please help
-
I'm having his error come up whenever I try to uninstall bootcamp 1.4 /windows xp Boot Camp Assistant Beta Has Expired I want to get rid of boot camp all together so how do I get around this?
-
Hi ! I have a question ! Is there a way to clear the cache of my entire application by passing parameters to my URL address ? For now, I have this URL : f?p=103:"+html_GetElement('P0_NO_PAGE').value+":"+html_GetElement('pInstance').value+":MODIF::12:
-
Apple TV, Airplay and caching
Hi Everyone I was just wondering whether our Apple TV (3rd gen) is actually caching the content we view via Airplay from our devices/computers? In other words, does Apple TV store the content locally in the same way it does iTunes movies, YouTube vid
-
Proxy to JDBC (Synchronus interface)
Hi Experts, i am sending the request to JDBC DataBase for C028 (company code ) getting the response like C028 Record data from JDBC Successfully. but while sending the multiple company codes like: C028,C043,C097 ,i am not getting the response for m