Description/metadata changes not synchronized

I have iTunes set to automatically sync all movies and tv shows in my library to Apple TV. When I add movies and shows they come in with no metadata so I edit the info in iTunes. I usually see the Apple TV sync process start up, and I stop it while editing the metadata. Once I'm done cleaning up the files I go to the Apple TV tab and click on sync, and I see it transfer all the new files. For whatever reason the metadata changes are not reflected in the newly uploaded files.
Is this something others have seen? I find manually fixing the metadata a bit unwieldy and time consuming as it is, so this problem makes getting good files onto the Apple TV that much more annoying.
Has anyone else seen this issue or have any recommendations on how to get the Apple TV to see these metadata changes?
Thanks.

This thread <http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5172730> points to a bug that allows those who use 'Sync All' to remove and re-send updated movies easily.
Just uncheck the problematic files, manually Sync Apple TV, re-check the files, and do another manual sync.
That we have to do this is beyond silly.

Similar Messages

Metadata changes not applied to all selected images

I am having 2 problems.
When I am in lightroom's library (3.5), I would like to change the time of capture for multiple photos, and apply keywords.
However, when I perform either of those actions, the changes are only applied to the image shown in the "more brightly highlighted" image, not all that are selected.
Is there a setting I am missing? I just cannot seem to figure out why this is not working.
Also, I aplogize if my searching skills are weak and this has been covered already. I did attempt to see if this question has been answered before posting.
Thanks.

You need to be in Grid view to apply metadata to all selected images, otherwise LR will only apply it to the image shown in the main area. Alternatively, you can swith on AutoSync in Library.
Also, I aplogize if my searching skills are weak and this has been covered already. I did attempt to see if this question has been answered before posting.
I don't think it's your skills that are weak, but the search feature of this forum ....
Beat

DNG metadata changes not showing up

I've made development changes in Lightroom to photos on my laptop. However, they aren't showing up when I import them to my desktop (I'm not applying any import settings upon import). Any suggestions here would be greatly appriciated!

Hi Gabe,
Another option which I use is to hook my laptop up to my network (ethernet cabled for speed, but wireless works as well) then from my master catalog on my desktop I import from the catalog on the laptop. Like Ian's approach of saving the Metadata into the DNG file then importing the DNG files into LR, you get the same end result. However, by importing the catalog I get the opportunity to place the DNG files in their proper, permenant location automatically and I save all the history steps of the editing I did on the laptop, which unless it was recently changed with a LR update, is lost using the import from DNG files approach.
If you use my approach, I generally delete all images from the laptop catalog, from within LR, and opt to delete files from disk AND catalog, when I am certain they are properly in the master catalog. I hate doing edits twice on the same images by mistake
Jeff

Metadata changes not showing in Bridge

I have added some metadata to some files in Lightroom (both keywords and some IPTC info like city, country, etc).
But when I look at the files in Bridge CS2, I don't see the changes.
Do I need to commit the cahnges somehow?
Per-Gunnar

This problem seems to work in other way also:
If I edit RAW picture in lightroom, give it rating, flag and color label, they doesn't show in bridge. However, if I put keywords in Bridge _after_ editing image in lightroom, keywords never show up in LR.

Changes not synchronizing

Good day everyone. We are on GroupWise 7.0.3 SuSE server using ConsoleOne to Admin. Clients are Windows based.
Approximately two or three weeks ago I began noticing that any sort of change made within ConsoleOne takes an extra long time for them to synchronize with the system/client.
Examples are adding a new user to the system. I added a user this morning and it took 30 minutes for me to finally be able to log into the account. I kept getting the "User ID 'user' not found" message even though they were fully visible in ConsoleOne.
If I change a users password it can take several hours for it to finally sync.
If I make a change to the users account, such as phone number or title, it can take several hours to sync.
None of this was happening before. Changes would update within a couple of minutes. The only change that I am aware of is I added POA audit maintenance at around the same time but I have since revoke this maintenance and have stopped the POA, deleted the ngwcheck.db and started the POA.
I have found that in some cases stopping and starting the MTA seems to help.
I have to believe that one of you geniuses will have an idea of how to cure.
Thanks in advance.

I don't know what is happening in this case, but think through what
the process is and a) you will understand where to look and b)
probably be able to direct us better :-)
When you create a new user (or change a password) you open ConsoleOne
and that connects to the wpdomain.db file and reads the records. This
is either on the server using VNC or SSH -X or from a workstation via
some kind of share (SAMBA/NFS/???)
You create the new user, and that is added to the wpdomain.db file,
and an admin message is generated that is then placed in the queue for
the post office in wpcsout. That message is then transmitted from the
mta to the poa and written out to the wpcsout queue in the PO data
structure, that is then processed and the new account created and once
that is completed the user can connect.
So if there are problems with the MTA-POA communication there can be
issues with the length of time taken, if there is a samba or NFS lock
there can be a time issue, if the file system is full where the PO or
Domain reside there can be a time issue... You get the drift :-)
The most likely is a communication issue with the domain and PO and to
check that you would want to ensure that both have been set to bind
exclusivly to the specified IP number and that the domain uses port
7100 and the PO 7101 for their message transfer.
HTH
T
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:36:02 GMT, gecco
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Good day everyone. We are on GroupWise 7.0.3 SuSE server using
>ConsoleOne to Admin. Clients are Windows based.
>
>Approximately two or three weeks ago I began noticing that any sort of
>change made within ConsoleOne takes an extra long time for them to
>synchronize with the system/client.
>
>Examples are adding a new user to the system. I added a user this
>morning and it took 30 minutes for me to finally be able to log into the
>account. I kept getting the "User ID 'user' not found" message even
>though they were fully visible in ConsoleOne.
>
>If I change a users password it can take several hours for it to
>finally sync.
>
>If I make a change to the users account, such as phone number or title,
>it can take several hours to sync.
>
>None of this was happening before. Changes would update within a couple
>of minutes. The only change that I am aware of is I added POA audit
>maintenance at around the same time but I have since revoke this
>maintenance and have stopped the POA, deleted the ngwcheck.db and
>started the POA.
>
>I have found that in some cases stopping and starting the MTA seems to
>help.
>
>I have to believe that one of you geniuses will have an idea of how to
>cure.
>
>Thanks in advance.

Description changes not reflecting in User Decision step

Hi,
I am displaying the ECM (cc01) description in the workflow user decision step. In this user decision step I do have three options
    1. Changes completed (to move the ECM to next level)
    2. Edit ECM (Calls ECM n change mode CC02)
    3. Cance (standard)
If I choose Edit ECM, and change the description in the ECM and come back to the user decision step, it still shows the older description some cases. In some cases I am getting the updated description in user decision step. In Edit ECM step I am using Z method which is the copy the standard BO method Edit_synchron of ECM to call the transaction CC02.
Z method does not contain any importing or exporting parameters. Also in the workflow<->Task binding I bound ECM <-> _WF_Object_ID.
Thanks,
Muruganantham

2 case:
1.) Description not changing: How the description get populated in user decision step ? Is it some varibale get populated based on select query ?
2.) Description get changed: Please check the new workflow instance get created and you can only see changed text in new instance. Already triggered workflow will not show the changed value.
Please check the worklow design, whether its creating new workflow instance on every change in ECM ?
BR,
Prakash

Lightroom is not saving metadata. I have done several things to save and I still get the tag that states is is not saved. I have also created 2 smart collections. One showing metadata has been changed and one showing metadata is not up to date. No matter

Lightroom is not saving metadata. I have done several things to save and I still get the tag that states is is not saved. I have also created 2 smart collections. One showing metadata has been changed and one showing metadata is not up to date. No matter what I do it is not showing in LR that it is saved. I spent 2 days with Seth Resnick trying to correct this and we re created my catalog. It was ok, until I imported new images and same problem. Now I have a new problem, when I bring image to PS it saves it but does not bring back to LR. Am I the only one out there who has this problem?

See:
How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer
What is the best way to manage multiple...: Apple Support Communities

Team Collaboration: Change the Task attributes are not synchronized...

Hello!
I am sorry for my poor English.
When you modify in the Team Collaboration the following Task attributes:
Percentage of completion and Status of implementation,
the changes are not synchronized with others tools (OBEO, Zimbra, Mozilla Sunbird).
Change of Status of implementation of synchronized only in Mozilla Sunbird.
Can anyone give an explanation or solution for this?
P.S.
The problem I found recently in 2.0.1.5. (I think that in earlier versions was the same)
Patch set 2.0.1.6 does not eliminate this defect.

The answer to my question is,
I am stupid. I don't pay attention to the details.
For clarification I did the following...
class superclass{
private Integer PIN = new Integer(100);
// this is the part in my code that I forgot.
protected Integer getSecretPin(){
    return PIN;
class sub{
sub me;
public sub(){
    me = this;
// Sneaky stuff
public Integer getPIN(){
    return
      ((superclass)me).getSecretPin();
}I was tracking down a bug and was writing some output debugging and THOUGHT that I had stumbled on a security thing. On further inspection into the superclass code I had really accessed a protected method. My compiler ignored the casting.
Thanks to all for "Looking into it."
Peace

How do I get Bridge and Lightroom to respect - read - metadata changes?

I cull my wedding images in Bridge (CS 6) and then export them into LR 4. I typically rate images as I'm culling, but when I import those images into LR, the ratings don't carry over. Likewise, when I label images in LR and export them, Bridge shows all the color labels as white - regardless of which label was actually assigned.

Lr saves all edits and any other metadata changes in its database (= the catalog).
Additionally to the catalog you can <save to file>,i.e. to a xmp-file (in case of a Raw photo), or in the header (but not in the image pixels!) of a JPG, TIFF, or PSD.
Saving to file is done by
_ either checking the box <Automatically save changes to xmp> in >Edit >Catalog Settings >metadata tab, or manually
_ by going >Metadata >Save metadata to file (in Lr Library Module), or
_ by going >Photo >Save metadata to file (in Develop Module.
When you save manually to file you can select multiple photos in the Grid Mode and do <Save metadata to file>.
This saving to file is necessary in order that Bridge can read and display the Lr edits because Bridge cannot read the Lr catalog.
Bridge saves to file automatically (there is no option of deselecting it) and Lr will read the metadata from Bridge when you import the image into Lr.
In case of an image that is already in Lr you have to select >Metadata >Read metadata from file (in Lr Library Module), or
by going >Photo >Read metadata from file (in Develop Module). Without this <Read metadata from file>, Lr will not display any changes made in Bridge after the import into Lr. Since this <read metadata from file> would overwrite any different edits you may have done in Lr, it is best to do this before you do further edits in Lr.
The rating stars should transfer from Bridge to Lr and vice versa without problems.
For the color labels to transfer correctly you have to make the textual descriptions for the individual colors identical in Lr and in Bridge - down to upper/lower case, commas, hyphens, underscores, etc.
Having said this:
I would recommend that you do not use Bridge for culling your images. You can do the culling just as easy in Lr. When you manage photos in Bridge and in Lr, you will always have the problem of synchronizing the metadata. This can be done but it needs a meticulous workflow that is adhered to strictly.
There is nothing in Bridge that Lr cannot do *). Make your life easier and choose Lr as your only image management and editing tool, except for CS6 itself (I mean Photoshop itself, not the ACR ).
*) Well there is one thing: Since Lr is not a browser-based program it does not automatically "see" what is on a hard drive. Photos need to be imported in order that Lr will "see" them.
Bridge is browser-based. Whatever photo is on a hard drive - irrespective of which program put it there - it will be "seen" by Bridge.
So Bridge is a valuable tool if a photo is not displayed in Lr and you want to check if it is in a particular folder.

Slave instance can not synchronized with the master for a long time

Hi,
Slave instance can not synchronized with the master for a long time, and the gap of LSNs between slave and master are more and more larger. The transfer bytes per second between master and slave is 118MB/s , upper limit to the ethernet card. Why???
ENVIRONMENT:
1. A network program which we called mcdb is based on BDB 4.8.30. It is used to accept get/set requests and then query data from bdb or save data to bdb.
2. mcdb implements replication with bdb replication manager api. The default start replication policy is DB_REP_ELECTION, rep ack policy is DB_REPMGR_ACKS_ONE_PEER and rep priority is 100.
3. The bdb data files, bdb log files, region files and rep files are all in the same home directory.
4. There are two instances of the mcdb are separately on two standalone servers which has no other programs. These two instances are in one replication group which can elect a master automatically.
5. The master instance is online, which has lots of requests (get, set, delete).
ACTIONS:
1. Start two mcdb instances on two servers and the two instance make a replication group. Slave has already synchronized with the master.
2. Stop the slave for a long time (more than 20 hours).
3. Start the slave instance to synchronize data with master.
RESULT:
1. the gap of LSNs between slave and master are more and more larger.
2. db_stat of master and slave:
master db_stat:
467170     Number of PERM messages not acknowledged
9245     Number of messages queued due to network delay
172415     Number of messages discarded due to queue length
25880     Number of existing connections dropped
3407     Number of failed new connection attempts
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
DB_REPMGR site information:
10.67.15.146 (eid: 0, port: 30011)
Environment configured as a replication master
331726/3574994     Next LSN to be used
0/0     Not waiting for any missed log records
328872/466092     Maximum permanent LSN
0     Next page number expected
0     Not waiting for any missed pages
0     Number of duplicate master conditions originally detected at this site
2147M     Current environment ID (2147483647)
100     Current environment priority
49     Current generation number
50     Election generation number for the current or next election
2323     Number of duplicate log records received
0     Number of log records currently queued
6768     Maximum number of log records ever queued at once
55284     Total number of log records queued
120M     Number of log records received and appended to the log (120475988)
111     Number of log records missed and requested
2147M     Current master ID (2147483647)
2     Number of times the master has changed
0     Number of messages received with a bad generation number
8505306     Number of messages received and processed
12     Number of messages ignored due to pending recovery
471869     Number of failed message sends
12M     Number of messages sent (12959945)
0     Number of new site messages received
1     Number of environments believed to be in the replication group
990543     Transmission limited
0     Number of outdated conditions detected
0     Number of duplicate page records received
0     Number of page records received and added to databases
0     Number of page records missed and requested
Startup complete
6244678     Number of transactions applied
0     Number of startsync messages delayed
1     Number of elections held
1     Number of elections won
No election in progress
0.057097     Duration of last election (seconds)
8944103     Number of bulk buffer sends triggered by full buffer
0     Number of single records exceeding bulk buffer size
5273M     Number of records added to a bulk buffer (5273592170)
10M     Number of bulk buffers sent (10490865)
0     Number of re-request messages received
0     Number of request messages this client failed to process
0     Number of request messages received by this client
slave db_stat:
0     Number of PERM messages not acknowledged
0     Number of messages queued due to network delay
0     Number of messages discarded due to queue length
1454     Number of existing connections dropped
0     Number of failed new connection attempts
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
DB_REPMGR site information:
10.67.15.147 (eid: 0, port: 30011)
Environment configured as a replication client
329544/2916048     Next LSN expected
330433/2013808     LSN of first log record we have after missed log records
329543/5500501     Maximum permanent LSN
0     Next page number expected
0     Not waiting for any missed pages
0     Number of duplicate master conditions originally detected at this site
2147M     Current environment ID (2147483647)
100     Current environment priority
49     Current generation number
50     Election generation number for the current or next election
5256M     Number of duplicate log records received (5256599432)
3925284     Number of log records currently queued
3925285     Maximum number of log records ever queued at once
4880561     Total number of log records queued
3578038     Number of log records received and appended to the log
1912297     Number of log records missed and requested
0     Current master ID
1     Number of times the master has changed
0     Number of messages received with a bad generation number
12M     Number of messages received and processed (12980442)
2     Number of messages ignored due to pending recovery
0     Number of failed message sends
1912307     Number of messages sent
0     Number of new site messages received
0     Number of environments believed to be in the replication group
0     Transmission limited
0     Number of outdated conditions detected
0     Number of duplicate page records received
0     Number of page records received and added to databases
0     Number of page records missed and requested
Startup incomplete
110568     Number of transactions applied
80     Number of startsync messages delayed
0     Number of elections held
0     Number of elections won
No election in progress
0     Number of bulk buffer sends triggered by full buffer
0     Number of single records exceeding bulk buffer size
0     Number of records added to a bulk buffer
0     Number of bulk buffers sent
0     Number of re-request messages received
0     Number of request messages this client failed to process
0     Number of request messages received by this client
Edited by: 899585 on 2013-1-4 下午10:54
Edited by: 899585 on 2013-1-4 下午10:55

Hi,
Unfortunately, this issue is beyond the level of what is supported over the forum. Performance related issues are extremely complex and require an in-depth understanding of your environment and dedicated support. In a generic sense, you can look at this as a basic queueing problem. You have a server that went down and work is still coming in. When the server gets started it is possible that it may never catch up depending on new work coming in and the rate at processing the old work.
So what would you do in this case --- one thing would be to reduce the new work coming in. In HA terms this would be slowing the master down and you can increase DB_REP_ACK_TIMEOUT for this. Another thing you could do is add fresh servers to help reduce the workload. In HA terms, this would be the equivalent of restarting the client and give it a fresh look at everything. Another thing you could do is replan the system and load balance. In HA terms, it would mean something like take a hot backup of the master and reinit a client from scratch.
If you are interested in getting a dedicated support person working on this concern, please let me know and we can move forward down that path. Just respond to the thread with your email address and I will get in contact with you so we can pursue that approach.
thanks
mike

Sold to party refernce data not synchroning properly

Hi Guys,
Today I came across a new issue...
In CRM order we have External reference to sold to party. Here we enter PO number at header level and it will synchronize to R/3.with out any problem.
But when I try to change the PO Number in R/3 order at header level, that value is not synchronizing with CRM header level,
Only for Billed Itemu2019s PO number is getting changed for remaining items it remains unchanged.
Is it standard behavior of system or is there anything we need to change?
Please help me on this,
Thanks & Regards,
Shaik

Hi Shaik,
Please check the filters in SALESDOCUMENT middleware adapter object in CRM. If proper filters are not in place, it will not send the changes from ECC to CRM.
//Bhanu

White Balance NOT Synchronizing in Bridge CS5

Instead of LR3 I use Bridge CS5 and the camera raw tool for my edits (it's all the same tools and runs faster.) ANyways, a strange problem i noticed recently after SEVERAL job edits.. I noticed the white balance was not the same on all my files. THIS IS A HUGE *** PROBLEM FOR ME! I tried everything but for some reason Bridge is not synchronizing the white balance, even if I just have white balance selected.. I need to have all my files the same.. I doesn NOT work in the camera raw module and it does NOT work when you right click, go to settings, copy settings and then paste settings..
Any one else experienced this?
I have ACR 6.1 installed

Is the WB As Shot, perhaps? Synchronizing As Shot as your WB does exactly that, sets the WB to whatever the camera was set to, which if it is Auto WB in the camera, then the Temp/Tint values will be different for each photo. If you want all the WB settings to be the same Temp/Tint values you must change the WB to Custom or use one of the built-in WB selections that has a constant set of Temp/Tint numbers.
What I usually do is modify the As Shot WB to something slightly different by changing the Tint value and then set the Tint value back to what it was if necessary, which will make it say Custom instead of As Shot, and then synchronize with this Custom value.

Where can I find a description of changes introduced in rev 29.0?

UI has changed significantly. I'd like to see a description of changes rather than having to figure them out on my own.

Which can be found on say mozilla.org under the green Firefox download button where it says [http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/notes/ What’s New].

XMP Metadata Linking Not Functioning, PPro CS6 v6.0.5

Hi,
In the past I've been successful adding and storing metadata to the 'Description' column in the project window in the past with the 'Link' symbol activated in the Metadata panel under 'ile'>Dublin Core>>Description. This would allow me to retain the description metadata when the media is imported into a different project.
However I am using this same procedure this week, but the data does not seem to be saving/adding to the XMP 'File' metadata. See screen shot below. I've experienced this problem within different proejcts and with the three main media types in our production house: XDCAM EX, P2 MXF and Ikegami MXF.
Any thoughts why this would work previously, but not now? Is it related to the latest version updates?
This is a PC, Windows 7 system.
Thanks!

My take is that this is not a linking problem, per se. Rather, it looks like the problem is that the File section shows that the file is not editable.
So I'd investigate what's making Premiere think it can't revise the XMP. Could be that the files are read-only, that you don't have permissions to edit content in the parent folder, or that another program has the files locked. At least those are the most likely causes I can think of...

Audio and video not synchronized in recording made with Lync 2013

There appears to be no forum for the Lync 2013 client yet, so I am posting this in the Lync 2013 server forum.
Environment: Lync 2013 Server and Lync 2013 32-bit client. Only one Lync pool. Conference call was scheduled using "Lync Meeting" in Outlook about a week before the call. Call recorded on a laptop that was plugged into our LAN with an Ethernet
cable.
Problem: User scheduled a conference call with screen sharing (PowerPoint) and recorded the call. The audio and video are not synchronized in the recording. There is several minutes' delay, with the audio lagging behind the PowerPoint. The last slide
on the call was presented, the call ended, and the presenter ended the recording (I was present for all this and can confirm no user error in these steps); however, in the recording, the slides change before the speaker talks about it, and the last
couple of minutes are cut off.
Any ideas on why this happened? Web research has failed me. Thank you.

You may need to lower the recording quality as your PC might not be able to keep up the pace.
Go to Options in Lync client -> Recording -> Select 480p
Then test again
- Belgian Unified Communications Community : http://www.pro-lync.be - MCM/MVP/MCT

Description/metadata changes not synchronized

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for