Desktop 6.2.2 compatible with old Clie??

If I install Desktop 6.2.2 over 4.0.1 will my old Clie PEG-SJ30 still sync the Calendar and Contact list to the computer? I want to keep at least one Clie active as a seperate user from the Treo 700P i will be using.
Post relates to: Treo 700p (Alltel)
This question was solved.
View Solution.

It's not supported, unless you are using Vista there is no reason to install 6.2.2
Post relates to: None

Similar Messages

Is mountain lion compatible with old (2004) version of microsoft office for MAc?

I have heard that Mountain Lion is not compatible with old (2004) version of microsoft office for MAc. Is that true?

Kurt Lang wrote:
... unless, like me, you open up an uber-important Excel 2004 file in Excel 2011 and get the following dialog box which leads to a trashed Chart, which I need access to EVERY WEEK:
Can't say I've ever seen such error messages, and I've opened lots of files created back in OS 8. Also many more much older than that from Windows 95 and even MS-DOS.
Lucky for you; unlucky for me that an important Excel 2004 Chart gets corrupted when opened in Excel 2011!
I suspect the problem is in the conversion routine that Microsoft added to Office 2011 to update Excel 2004 files. How conversant are you historically with converting Excel 2004 files that contain charts to Excel 2011? Because your experience with OS 8, Windows 95 and even MS-DOS has no relevance on this issue.
Kurt Lang wrote:
You will notice, Kurt, that I based my advice to the OP as "if you are unable or unwilling to upgrade to Microsoft Office 2011..."
Yes, I saw it. But if everyone did what you would expect with your statement, no one would suggest upgrading to Office 2011. Besides, you're the one who stated "unable or unwilling", not the OP.
Are you always this argumentative, or is this my lucky day?
Many people suggest upgrading to Office 2011. I do it frequently in my other "workarounds" type of answers to the Rosetta in Lion/Mountain problem. I chose not to offer that solution here, and as I expected, someone else, namely you, did!
The problem was that you finished your suggestion with this comment: "Particularly when it isn't really necessary." Since this statement was not true in my case (it IS necessary for me to continue to use my important Excel 2004 file as well as some other historical files I have; and conceivably could be important to the OP), I posted the correction.
You also made the suggestion that: "...the cost of VM software isn't that much less than just upgrading to Office 2011." While certainly true in the vacuum of the OP asking specifically about Word 2004; when the OP becomes aware that his complete library of PPC applications will fail in Mountain Lion, your suggestion about the relative cost to upgrade may no longer be as relevant.
Lastly: Yes, I commonly state to similar OP's that if they are "unable" (because, for example, they may also have conversion problems with Office 2011, Appleworks 6, Freehand or other programs) or "unwilling" (perhaps they just cannot afford to upgrade all of their PPC apps at this time), that here is an alternative that will keep the status quo available to them, and buy them some more time to consider their options while continuing to use Lion/Mountain Lion and their PowerPC apps.
Is the relevance of my post to the OP's problem (and your reply to my solution) sufficiently clear for you now?

Problem making modified WCF web service operation compatible with old client

Hi,
I am trying to make a modified version of a a WCF web service work with old clients. The method signature looks like:
[OperationContract]
itemList GetItemList(getItemList param);
I am adding elements to the "getItemList" class which should be optional. The class is generated from XSD schema with xsd.exe (this means we are using schema-first design). The new element is:
<element name="itemOwner" type="string" maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0">      </element>
and the new generated code in the getItemList class becomes:
private string itemOwnerField;
public string itemOwner
get {return this.itemOwnerField;}
set {this.itemOwnerField = value; }
When I look at the new WSDL it has:
<xs:element name="itemOwnerField" nillable="true" type="xs:string"/>
Now I was expecting the old client to still be able to call the new client, since the new field is nillable. The client has a service reference to the old version of the web service so it uses a C# stub. When the old client tries to invoke the new service,
I get error:
The formatter threw an exception while trying to deserialize the message: There was an error while trying to deserialize parameter http://tempuri.org/:param. The InnerException message was 'Error in line 1 position 754. 'Element' 'itemIDField' from namespace
'http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/ServerBaseAPI' is not expected. Expecting element 'itemOwnerField'.'. Please see InnerException for more details.
My interpretation is that the server side of the new service cannot deserialize the incoming message since it expects it to contain itemOwnerField. Why it that, when it is nillable according to the WSDL? What can I do to solve or work around the problem?

Hi gaor.mawell,
The nillable attribute is a special attribute in the XML Schema instance namespace that provides an interoperable way to explicitly represent a null value. The receiving end can interpret these as
null, zero, and null, respectively. There is no guarantee that a third-party deserializer can make the correct interpretation, which is why this pattern is not recommended. The
DataContractSerializer class always selects the correct interpretation for missing values. So have you tried to use the DataMember's
IsRequired property? this
DataMember's
IsRequired property tells the serialization engine whether the value of itemOwnerField must be presented in the underlying XML.
For more information, please try to refer to the this artcle:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa347792(v=vs.110).aspx .
Best Regards,
Amy Peng
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Do not compatible with old verzion. OSX 5,6,7 ?

apple as I do in the future. I have it every three years to buy all new equipment? imac iphone ipad ibook = € 5,000. just because the numbers is not backward compatible

Numbers 3 is not compatible with OS X v10.8 or earlier. The iOS version requires iOS 7.
IF you NEED to use Numbers 3 on both platforms, you will need to install OS X, v10.9 on the Macs and iOS v7 on the iOS devices.
Your iBook will need to be replaced, or restricted to tasks not requiring Numbers 3, as OS X v10.8 and later requires Macs using intel processors (iBooks have Motorola/IBM G4 or G3 processors).
If your iMac is an intel based model, there will be a cost to move from OS X v10.7 or earlier, but no cost to move from OS X v10.8 to v10.9. The computer itself will probably not require being replaced at this time. If it is a PPC/G4 or G5 model, it is in the same category as the iBook.
iOS platform answers may be similar.
But you may decide you do not NEED to change from Numbers 2 (Numbers '09) to Numbers 3 or from the first version of Numbers for iOS to the current version. "Just because the numbers is not backwards compatible" could be a strong factor in your decision regarding the NEED to adopt it. It could well be the strongest consideration.
Before you make the decision, consider your needs, AND read the conversations in this and other forums, starting with these two threads:
What has been lost in Numbers 3.0 upgrade
What has been gained in Numbers 3.0 upgrade
Plus these:
Apple's current plans for reinstating Numbers features
User workarounds for missing features
Regards,
Barry

Burning CD's compatible with old Windows 98

I have discovered an issue when burning html files to CD. When inserted in a Windows 98 machine, the html files are readable, but formatted incorrectly. Have tried burning from both my iMac and Macbook both running 10.5.5 with same results. If the same files are attached to an email and then read on the Windows computer, the html format is correct, so it must have something to do with the CD burning process. I need the compatibility with old computers as many recipients are using old hardware. Any suggestions?

okay, folks with the 2380s on 64-bit versions of Windows (it can hit both XP and Vista) generally get relief from the 2380s by reinstalling the 64-bit versions of the GEAR drivers that iTunes uses for importing and burning.
here's a link through to the GEAR drivers:
GEAR drivers
note that there are two different versions of the 64-bit GEAR drivers. be sure to get the one that matches your hardware.

Why am I forced to update my OS because the Cloud desktop is not backward compatible with OS X 10.6.8? [was: Why do you do this...]

Why do you do this... My mac is old pro running Version 10.6.8 and now I cant up load the creative cloud desk top app without updating the OS. Why cant these apps be backward compatible? I am perfectly happy with V 10.6.8 and my old pro..

There is no requirement to move on from your old pro. I still use mine.

Advice: Desktop card that's compatible with Airport Extreme

I'm looking for some advice on what wireless card I should buy for an old desktop to connect it to my existing Airport setup. I've heard of compatibility issues with some cards so I thought I would present this question to someone with experience before I went out and bought one. The computer is not fast, so I'm not looking for a fast/expensive wireless card, just something that will work. b/g/n, it doesn't matter. The cheaper the better. Thanks in advance.

Hi again, Jim. It belatedly occurs to me to ask whether you checked System Profiler when your SIIG USB2 adapter was in place to see whether the adapter, or indeed the PC Card slot itself, was detected.
I ask because it's a relatively common occurrence in Tibooks, especially Tibooks that are handled and transported a lot (which causes flexing of the not-very-rigid chassis and logic board), for the connection between the PC card slot or cage and the logic board to work loose over time, leaving the card slot, any card in it, and anything that is connected to that card undetected. When this happens, the remedy is extremely simple: release your keyboard latches and gently flip the keyboard over onto the wrist rests, being careful not to jerk the keyboard ribbon cable. Beneath the normal positions of the X and D keys is a rectangular translucent plastic tab about 3/8" x 1-1/8". Using two fingertips, press down hard on that tab, which is the connector between the card cage and the logic board. If you hear or feel even the smallest shift or click, the connection was loose and is now properly seated. Return the keyboard to its place, insert the SIIG adapter if you still have it, supply it with power from its AC adapter or the auxiliary UB cable, connect your iPod, and test again.
If this works, test further to see whether or not you need the auxiliary power supply when using the iPod. You may not; I don't know.

Is the WD elements desktop 1.5 TB compatible with Lion?

I'm looking to buy an external hard drive, primarily to save my video editing work on Final Cut, so as not to bog down my Macbook with footage. IO heard that the WD Elements Desktop 1.5 TB drive was a good brand (WDBAAU0015HBK-NESN) was a good brand, although none of the literature I'm finding online confirms whether it's compatable with OS X Lion. Is it? Specifically, I'm running 10.7.2. If the WD Elements isn't compatible, do you reccomend another external hard drive that would work?

I would suggest the OWC Mercury Elite-AL Pro external HD. "It's designed to complement any user's system, the Mercury Elite Pro was created in mind with the Mac Pro system as a starting point. As the pictures show, it's a fine storage solution for any computer. Also, a blue activity LED complements the design recessed behind the front grille showing when your drive is being accessed."
I own this and I find it reliable for all my media files when video editing.
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/eSATA_FW800_FW400_USB

New AirPort Extreme backwards compatible with old Mac?

I have an old airport express from around 2004 and I made the mistake of upgrading directly from snow leopard to mountain lion. Subsequently I have been living with having to re enter my long WEP key every time I turn on my computer because of an incompatibility issue between the airport and my 2010 iMac. I want to get an AirPort Extreme to end this issue as well as increase the distance my computer and other wifi devices can be away from the base station.
The problem is that my parents have what i believe to be a 2006 intel iMac. I know the utility software for a new airport won't run on their old iMac. That's fine because I can run it on mine.
My question is, would my parent's old iMac have issues connecting to a network running on a new AirPort Extreme?
Thanks!

No, there would be no issues as WiFi is a standard.

Is Siri in iOS 6 compatible with old BMW bluetooth?

I just bought the iphone 5 and I have a 2003 BMW 540 with bluetooth. It seems that when I activate Siri, using the home button on the phone, while the phone is connected to the bluetooth Siri hears me through the bluetooth mic, but Siri's answers do not come over the car speakers. In essence, it is useless since I cannot hear the answers (the phone speaker is deactivated since it connected to the BMW bluetooth) and I do not want to take my eyes off the road to read the answers on the phone's screen. I can only think it is a bug in iOS 6 since Siri only hears me through the bluetooth mic and not from the phone's mic.
Thanks in avance for your help.

gul540 wrote:
I can only think it is a bug in iOS 6 since Siri only hears me through the bluetooth mic and not from the phone's mic.
That's right, it's a bug. Anytime iOS6 doesn't work the way we think it should, it's obviously a bug in iOS.
First off, your BMW is very old, so the Bluetooth profiles it uses might be out of date. Have you checked with your dealer for an update?
One thing you could try: On my Lincoln, my iPhone 4S connects using two profiles, one for the phone, and the other for streaming music and Siri. The Phone connects automatically, but the music stream does not. Try changing your stereo "input source" to Bluetooth Streaming or equivalent. When I did this with my 2012 Lincoln, all the Siri commands and responses went through the car speakers.
See here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1664

Is 10.7 compatible with old photoshop

10.7 seems to have disabled my old version of photshop. What can I do?

Only if your version of Photoshop is NOT a PPC-only version. It must be an Intel-only or Universal Binary version to work with Lion. Also, see:
The Lion Compatibility Site.

Are new MyBooks still compatible with old G5s?

Hi,
I've just filled up my MyBook and I want to add another one so I can continue to regualary back up my data, but I'm worried MyBooks have moved on while I'm still using my 1.8 Ghz PowerPC G5 (OS 10.5.8).
If I buy a shiny new MyBook and daisychain (?) it to my existing MyBook, will it work?
Sorry to be a ditz. I used to have a boyfriend who did this stuff for me. Should have listened and learned while I had the chance. My bad.

Hello Jesus S., and a warm welcome to the forums!
It can be hard to sometimes find where to start a New Topic, so here's the link for 10.5 installing...
http://discussions.apple.com/post!default.jspa?forumID=1219
The problem is, if there's Categories showing, you must drill down to a single one before you get the :Post New Topic Link"!
Yeah, it can be confusing as to where to find the Post New Topic button on this forum.
The reason it's hard to find that Post New Topic link, is because if there are any categories at the top, you must choose one first, like...
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=177
But say chose the Using Mac OS X Tiger and you get...
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=758&start=0
Clicking the Post New Topic link gets you here...
http://discussions.apple.com/post!default.jspa?forumID=758
that even holds crazy ones like iCal that have but one Category... iCal!
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=166

RDS 2012: Compatible with SQL Server 2014 AlwaysOn?

Is Remote Desktop Services 2012 R2 compatible with SQL Server 2014 AlwaysOn Availability Groups? Are there any procedural documents available for RDS requirements on how it expects AlwaysOn to be configured?
Thanks

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
As per my research, we can install SQL server 2014 on RDS Server 2012\R2, you can check below article with step by step guide.
How to install SQL Server 2014
In addition for SQL AlwaysOn Consideration there is useful blog (RDS 2012 SQL AlwaysOn Considerations) you can go through for details.
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Have lion on 5 year old 20" mac desktop. tried to download and received a message mountain lion not compatible with this computer. anyone else have this problem?

have lion 10.7.4 up graded from tiger 10.5.8. tried to download mountain lion but received a message that mountain lion is not compatible with my computer. anyone have this problem or suggestion?

It's actually not the chip... it's the drivers for the video card. this is what my friend who does IT work said.
"The drivers for your Mac's video card are not 64bit compatible even though the computer itself is. Mountain Lion has done away with all 32bit OS components so it only runs on full 64bit MAcs now"
So even though I updated my video card to a newer version and my computer itself is 64bit... apple didn't create a driver for it that was 64 bit. My hardware is fine for this update and the chip can handle it. It can handle all my 64 bit programs just fine. It's apple forcing me to update and buy a new expensive computer. So much for long lasting computer... they last long but they won't be supported very long.
Why not release a version of mountain lion that supports 32 bit graphics alongside the 64 bit? Wasn't that what grand central was going to accomplish? This is rubbish.

Is the Microsoft 5MH-00001 Wired Desktop 400 keyboard and mouse compatible with mac mini?

Hello, is the Microsoft 5MH-00001 Wired Desktop 400 for Business mouse and keyboard compatible with the mac mini computer? I tried using a generic mouse and the lights of the mouse were on, but I could not click or move the mouse around. Then when I plugged in a dell keyboard, it said the "keyboard is not identified". I could press buttons on the keyboard, but they werent being registered by the mac. I also tried changing my mouse's usb to a different port, but still did not work. So I am worried that the microsoft wired mouse + keyboard I ordered might not work on my mac mini. Is there a way to get my old keyboard and mouse to work at least?

Were these other ones you tried Wired also? If so that's really strange!?
Did you try rebooting with them connected?
I see no reason for the Microsoft 5MH-00001 Wired Desktop 400 for Business to not work, but then any wired Generic KB should work!???

Desktop 6.2.2 compatible with old Clie??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for