Desktop's too small

For some reason, the amount of desktop visible on my monitor is really, really small- there's this thick, black frame around it and I can't seem to remove the frame. And I have no idea how it got that way, either. I couldn't find anything in "settings" that would fix it. anyone know why it looks like this and what I can do about it?

There are adjustments you can make to the monitor (read the user manual for your monitor) and you can change the display's resolution using the Displays preferences.

Similar Messages

  • Installed on Windows 8.1 and desktop illustrator too small buttons to work with tools

    Please, if you know what I need to do... talk to me please. Now my up - buttons on my workspase is 1\4 - 1\5 of all window.  I have so much free plase on my workspace and so small buttons...((( I don't know what I need to do...

    I think CS6 doesn't support Windows HiDPI systems.
    You might try this, but it's not for the faint at heart:
    Adobe App Scaling on High DPI Displays (FIX) | Dan Antonielli

  • Font too small/faint in Version 4.1.4

    I recently erased the Palm files on my computer.  When I put them back on, both the font size and boldness on the desktop are too small and too faint.  I've looked for ways to make them larger and/or bolder in order to make them more readable, but have not been able to find anything.  Does anyone have any advice?  I know part of the problem is my failing eyesight, but surely others have had the same problem?  Thanks.
    Post relates to: Tungsten E2

    Using "regedit" I was able to change the font size larger for use with the Palm Desktop software.
      Run "regedit" and export (save) a backup copy for safety
        File  >  Export  
      Search for "FontSmall"
        Edit  >  Find  >  Find what  >  FontSmall
      Click on FontSizeGeneral and change the "Value data" to 16
      Exit "regedit"
      Run Palm Desktop software and enjoy the new legible font size!
      Notes:
      1) The location of the Palm Desktop software on my system using "regedit" is:
            HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\U.S. Robotics\Pilot Desktop\Core
            * Your location of the Palm Desktop software may differ.
      2) I tested this on monitors using resolutions of 1280 x 1024 and 1024 x 768
            The font size is noticeably readable and much, much better
      3) You may also change the font family from the default (Arial) to another, such as Verdana, etc.
            FontCard    (Changes the font family in the side panels)
            FontGeneral    (Changes the font family for most of the program fonts)
      4) Operating System: Windows XP Pro
            Palm Desktop v4.1.4

  • The fonts are too small on my imac desktop and web browsers.  Where can I increase the size?

    The fonts are too small on my imac desktop and web browsers.  Where can I increase the size?

    babowa wrote:
    The only way to increase the fonts on your desktop would be system wide by going down a notch on the resolution. Some people won't do it because it increases the pixel size so the fonts won't be quite as sharp; I decided I'd rather have that than having to squint continuously. Go to System Preferences > Displays > Scaled > this will give you all resolution options available. No harm in trying - just check the default (top) choice again if you don't like any of the others.
    It's a b*&^ch getting old .  I still use the screen zoom instead of decreasing resolution, but maybe soon ...

  • How do I make icons bigger? All icons are way too small for speedy use. no matter what I do they remain too small. Is there a way of getting them the same size as previous versions?

    All icons, such as refresh page, back, forward, stop and home etc; are just too small for comfortable use. For now I am uninstalling Firefox 4 and going back to 3.x. even the zoom page icons are too small.

    "I had read that GarageBand or the Musical Typing there can sometimes not display properly when the resolution is changed."
    Well, did you checked GB after you changed your resolution?
    Which setting did you change to?
    You & I have the same size iMac screen. My resolution setting is 1280x800. Everything fits perfectly in the windows & on desktop including the menu bar.
    All info in my windows are showing. I did not need to adjust my browser font size settings. I am sure you are aware of the browser font size settings. I use FF & the settings are in Preferences>Content.
    In the Finder window you can enlarge the icons & fonts also.
    Finder>View>Show View Options.

  • Install error : disk cannot be used to start up your computer [or] MediaKit reports partition (Map) too small

    Greetings,
    I am aware that this problem has been discussed, but in long and vague discussions that I had to sift deeply to find an answer. Therefore I am posting a clear message, as this problem can be very troublesome for someone who just received a Mac OS installation disk and cannot install it.
    Situation : you cannot install/update your new system because the installer does not consider your volume.
    Error message : this disk cannot be used to start up your computer.
    Version française : Ce disque ne peut pas être configuré pour démarrer votre ordinateur.
    Also discussed below error: "MediaKit reports partition (Map) too small"
    Note : although this occurred with a Snow Leopard (10.6) install DVD, it can alo occur with Lion (10.7) according to discussions on Apple web site.
    IF YOUR CONDITIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS :
    - You are using an official Apple installation DVD of Mac OS 10.6 (Snow Leopard) [or 10.7 Lion] or an official download/upgrade of those systems.
    - Your main Mac partition scheme is in GUID as it should be (check with Disk Utility). That partition contains a Mac system that can start-up.
    - Your volume format is: Mac OS Extended (journaled) [the format should not be Case Sensitive.]
    - You have the hardware requirements to install Mac OS 10.6 (Intel processor; internal or external DVD drive or a linked DVD drive; 1 GB of RAM; a screen controlled by your computer graphics card; at least 5 GB space on the hard disk or 7 GB if you install all components).
    - Using Disk Utility, you of course tried the disk Repair Tool and the Repair Permissions tool.
    - Your hard disk does not have a file called Backups.backupdb (if it does, this means Time Machine has once used this hard disk for its back-ups). Anyhow, if it were the case, the installation would give a different error message (with the word TimeMachine). This file may block the installation: Apple Support suggest to place it in the garbage, *without* deleting it, and placing it back on the disk later. Mind you, if you do not use this hard disk as such to save your Time Machine back-ups, you can simply delete this file.
    HOW TO FIX :
    1. Boot with the 10.6 install DVD (Tip: you can either select Mac 10.6 as the boot DVD in your Start-up Preferences or simply press down c during the start-up).
    2. Above the install screen, you have a Utilities tab from where you can run Disk Utility. Select your hard disk and select the Partition tab. Resize the primary Mac partition (don't add a new one) by decreasing it by about 5 GB.
    It will look like this http://i.imgur.com/jHTbr.jpg
    ( That image shows only one partition, but the same principle applies even if you have two or more partitions on your disk.)
    Also see the official Apple how to: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3926
    Version française: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3926?viewlocale=fr_FR
    3. Commit the change by hitting "Apply"
    3.b. If you get the error "MediaKit reports partition (Map) too small", this is a rare error where the partition that follows (for example Bootcamp) is slightly overlapping your main Mac partition. You will need to reduce that other following partition. Once you have reduced the other partition, you will probably need to return to step 2 and 3 and try again.
    [ For example, in my case, I had resized my Bootcamp with CampTune software and it would seem that the file system ended-up somehow larger than the actual partition container. I simply asked CampTune to reduce the partition a bit (barely 2 GB) and that fixed it.]
    4. Reboot, again into the 10.6 install DVD.
    5. You can then install 10.6.
    6. Once 10.6 is installed, use the Disk Utility on the desktop (you can boot into the primary HD at this point) to resize the primary partition back to its original or maximum size.
    SOURCE (main fix): http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=774410 [and] http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3926
    SOURCE (explaination for MediaKit error): some Apple discussion post.
    nb: in my case, it was on a MacBook Pro (late 2008).

    GasMan4932 wrote:
    When I click on the icon for this drive, the warning message below states "Mac OS X cannot be installed on 'iMac HD', because this disk cannot be used to start up your computer." Obviously that's not true, since that's where the OS is installed.
    How did you partition this drive, if you did that? Does it contain start up or utility partitions for any other OS (for instance Linux)? There have been reports that the "cannot be used to start up your computer" message will appear if a third party utility was used to create a 'triple boot' system or such, apparently because SL is picky about the format GUID partition scheme table info & how partitions are allocated space on the drive by other formatting/partition methods.
    For some users with these partitions, the fix has been as simple as "tickling" (slightly changing) the partition size of some partition with Disk Utility, which apparently updates the GUID partition scheme table info so that the SL installer accepts it as safe to use with SL.( In this sense, the message may be trying to say the installer thinks the disk can't be used to reliably start up your computer with SL, not in general.)
    See the discussions topic Cannot install Snow Leopard over 10.5.8 for more about this.

  • Images  too small to edit

    Something just  happened here. In the past, when I open any photo in Elements 10, the image would pretty much fill the space. the bottom edge of the picture would almost reach the bottom of the workspace...whether vertical or horizontal format. Then I would create a duplicate and hit either ctrl + 0 (zero) and the duplicate would be a nice large size. ( Double clicking on the little hand in the tool bar would also do the same trick).
    Now , for some reason, the picture opens to maybe 60% of that size. It's way too small to work on comfortably. The duplicate is even smaller.  When I hit the ctrl + 0 ...nothing happens size remains the same. If I pull on lower right hand corner to enlarge...it only enlarges the ruler and frame. Picture itself remains same small size. How can I get that back? I tried a system restore. that did not work. Thank you.

    Hi Barbara,
    Thank you for your response.
    I don't use the Organizer. Never have. I have my own system which I've been using for over 10 years and thousands of pictures...first with Photoshop 6; later with PSE 7 on  earlier computers and now with PSE 10 since June 2012.  Its always been fine beforehand. And I have only had problems with 10 on this. Its happened before but I think last time it was under warranty and on screen dialog Support Team helped me get it back.
    This is how I work.....
    Whenever I save my photographs, I create a (new)  file on the desktop.  then I will download all the images from that project  from the SD card into the file ( example...Quebec...or Dilapidated Houses; or Antique Car Show 5/2013;  etc etc.) OK then when I want to edit a picture.... I open that particular one in PSE. Then I immediately make a duplicate. OK Here is where the problem now occurs. Prior to today, after I have the duplicate on the screen.....I would just hit ctrl + 0 (zero)  and the picture enlarged to a nice size. Very easy to see and work with. (One can also double click on the little hand in the tool bar for the same effect). But something happened here and when I now do that...the image does NOT enlarge. It actually creates a smaller duplicate.  Which makes it VERY hard to edit when its so small.
    Please refer to the page  attached to this email file. These should help to show what my problem is here.
    How do I get back the function where ctrl + 0 (zero) or double clicking on the toolbar hand gives me a nice full image?
    Thank you.
    Art Herman

  • Menus and Fonts too small with Panasonic HDTV

    I just hooked up a new Mini (Intel chip) to my Panasonic HDTV-- 34" Model No. CT-34WX53-- using a DVI cable. The desktop shows up fine, but the menus and fonts are so tiny that I can't read them. When I try using Front Row, the pictures and vide are gorgeous and the fonts in Front Row are fine. It's just the fonts and menus in on the desktop and in other programs that are too small. Does anyone know how to fix?
    Mini Core Duo   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  
    Mini Core Duo   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    Edward,
    That's the price of having a gazillion pixels!
    You have two options - send less pixels to the display or change each application (Including the finder) to show larger fonts and icons.
    The lower the resolution option is easy and fast. The downside of "zoom"-ing the display is it may look blocky at certain resolutions and the fonts and fine details in photos and movies may be lost if the mac has to alias or scale the video. If you do this - you might want to enable the menu bar item for display preferences to quickly switch between the setting you prefer. I use one setting for actually using the mac and another setting for playing movies and showing slides in FrontRow.
    The change the preferences to make the fonts and icons larger is more of a pain but yields the most crisp display and you don't have to change things up. I would start with Finder Preferences (select an icon on your desktop and on the View menu - show view options - crank up the icon size and font size.) Unfortunately - you have to do this in each application you use. It also won't change the menu font sizes - you might need an "extension" from a developer to change that.

  • Open file/browse-file dialog window size too small

    It seems like the size of the "Open file" and "Browse file"-dialog windows have become too small to use efficiently.
    I'm not sure if this is related to the latest updates from testing, but it wasn't like this before. I have to resize the dialog window every time in order to be able to select files and folders.
    The changes are not saved across the same session of a program, but it does result in unpredictable behavior in gedit.
    If I resize the open file dialog, then close the dialog, then open it again, the changes are sometimes preserved, but not always. Sometimes it's small and sometimes it's resized, and there's no way of telling.
    I'm running compiz-fusion and emerald, but the bug is not related to window manager, as it's the same with metacity and openbox. So it's for all GTK programs.
    When I try to run gnome-appearance-properties, I get:
    "Unable to start the settings manager 'gnome-settings-daemon'.
    Without the GNOME settings manager running, some preferences may not take effect. This could indicate a problem with Bonobo, or a non-GNOME (e.g. KDE) settings manager may already be active and conflicting with the GNOME settings manager."
    and the problem remains no mather what GTK theme I choose.
    Is gnome-settings-daemon responsible for this kind of behavior?
    Last edited by WeeDie (2008-10-12 00:52:03)

    The issue was resolved by updating all to gnome-desktop 2.24 from testing..
    Seems like the swedish repository mirrors are a bit left behind..

  • Characters in Photoshop 8 too small

    After installing Photoshop 8 successfully in my new computer equipped with Win 8.1, the characters are too small (size 6 and 8), so are the tool icons. In my old computer equipped with Win XP, the characters were normal (size 10 and 11) nd icons larger. I arranged in Win 8.1 that all display's characters have the size 10 or 11. Photoshop 8 doesn't follow it. How to make it display the same sizes as it is in the other applications which follow suite? Thank you.
    Regars,
    Petar Volkov, E-mail: [email protected]

    Sounds like you have a high resolution display.  The Photoshop user interface has the same number of pixels it always had. Its just thatthe you pixels on your high resolution display are much smaller then the ones on your old low resolution display.  Your old display had a resolution around 100 DPI your new display had a resolution around 300DPI  so everything is 1/3 the width and 1/3the height of your 100 dpi display 1/9 the size you use to.
    Adobe is working on making their PC UI adjustable to be useable on high resolution displays. Like they did in the Mac Photoshop version. For now Attach a external display to your laptop. All desktop display have low resolution around 100DPI. Photoshop will not be the only application you will have problems with.

  • PC HD too small to consilidate song Files.

    I have songs scattered over several hard drives(3) in my desktop Win XP PC. The drive the main iTunes library is on is too small to consolidate all the songs. The library of itunes songs is much larger than my ipod. I want to to move the files and library to a larger drive. Suggestions?

    Are any of the drives large enough to hold everything?
    Just go to itunes preferences > advanced tab
    Set the " itunes media folder location" to the drive that is large enough.
    Make sure "copy files when adding..." is checked.
    Then run the file > library > consolidate command.
    iTunes will move everything to the new large drive.

  • Yosemite fonts too small for middle aged eyes

    I just updated my desktop to Yosemite and am wishing I hadn't - the designers clearly don't have a clue what happens to normal eyesight in middle age. I am NOT vision impaired - just a little bit short-sighted (-1.5) and a little bit long-sighted (+1) and a little bit astigmatic, with up-to-date glasses that correct my sight properly. I am nonetheless finding using this new OS on my new 1920x1080 (non-Apple) monitor, which worked perfectly with Mavericks, absolute torture - all the text in menus, settings screens etc is just much too small for comfort, at least in the chosen font. In some apps I can use Cmd-+ to increase the font size, but there seems to be nothing I can do about the font sizes in Finder, Preferences etc
    I have read the threads about the reasons and ways to mitigate the problem, and have increased contrast and reduced transparency in the Accessibility settings, and am considering running the script to change the default font back to Lucida Grande. But my point is that I have perfectly normal eyesight (for someone of 53) and have never had any screen problems before, so I shouldn't need to be using the Accessibility settings. I know it is fashionable among designers to create lots of blank white space, but white space doesn't compensate for illegibility!
    I can see from all the threads on this topic that I am not alone. So please Apple, sort this out - usability must come first - and not just for the under 30s!

    Even iBooks on MBP Retina !? 
    I love the iBooks app and use it specifically because of the "Night" appearance option, which turns the page background all black and the font white (similar to inverting the display). Fortunately books' font sizes remain adjustable as big as I want, but - I can no longer see page information (current page number and number of pages left to read) at the bottom of each page.  The page information is barely visible (appears like small dark grey foggy font on a black background). This is very likely also the result of the Yosemite font fiasco.  Not an issue when reading books in "Night" appearance on the iPad, (they didn't break it yet yet in iOS).
    "Digital Books without page numbering information"!
    A Huge design fiasco.

  • Phone and Tablet versions are too small

    When using a phone or tablet to view my website www.elrocco.com.au the pages are too small.
    The desktop version is fine.
    I use GoDaddy for domain management and forward to elrocco.businesscatalyst.com
    When I use the url elrocco.businesscatalyst.com directly on the phone or tablet, everything is fine.
    Is threre something I need to do on GoDaddy to ensure the phone and tablet versions display correctly?
    Thanks in advance for you help.

    It appears you were able to figure this out as the site looks just fine (and identical to the BC's system domain) when viewed through an iPhone.
    Thanks,
    Vinayak

  • In iPhoto 11 imported tiff files remain tiff after editing.  I need to convert to large file jpegs. How? using the "export" function they become too small

    I thought imported tiff files would be converted by iPhoto to JPEGS in previous versions of iPhoto.  this might have been a disadvantage but my current project requires JPEGs as the final product.
    thanks for any guidance
    Jim

    Drag the photo from the iPhoto window to the desktop or export as kind = JPEG
    As to too small - what is too small?  The pixel dimensions of the exported JPEG will be identical to the original TIFF - the file size is smaller because JPEGs are compressed - which of course reduces file size - which of course is the reason that JPEG exists
    LN

  • Lync 2013 Edge - Windows Standard 2012 - Set-CSCertificate gives me "The buffer supplied to a function was too small."

    Hello,
    I'm having some issues during the installation of our new Edge 2013 server, specifically when trying to assign the external certificate.
    We have a Lync 2010 deployment already, and this is a step in the migration to the new version.
    On the 2010 Edge server, we have a Geotrust SAN certificate currently which it has been running nicely with for the past couple of years since we installed it.
    However, after trying to assign the certificate to the Lync 2013 Edge server, it just keeps giving me "set-cscertificate : Command execution failed: The buffer supplied to a function was too small."
    If I request a certificate from our Internal CA, it assigns fine and there's no problem - however I've gone over all the Subject Alternate Names on the Geotrust Cert and all of them are present, the certificate was exported and imported with the private
    key so that should not be the issue either. The common name on them are the same, and all the SAN's are there, along with quite a few others (Though I expect this should not present any problems.)
    We didnt have the intermediate Geotrust CA in the "Intermediate Certification Authorities" list, so I've imported that along with a current CRL but it still refuses to assign the certificate.
    Trying to find some more details on the error message seems rather futile - some more details to the error messages would have been helpful, but I'm hoping someone here might be able to give me a hand in diagnosing the actual issue.
    Thanks in advance,
    Johan

    In our case we traced the problem to the version of the certificate template. We could not utilize a v3 template from our Enterprise CA. Once the CA administrator configured and granted us the permissions to a v2 certificate template we were able to successfully
    assign a certificate to Lync.
    The problems comes in regarding the cryptography provider of the certificate template. Certificates based upon a v2 template utilize CryptoAPI (Cryptography API), and v3 templates utilize CNG (Cryptography API: Next Generation) as the cryptography
    provider.
    Lync Server 2010 and 2013 it appears, do not seem to utilize v3 certificates properly. This article explains how to determine which version of cryptography provider is being used by for the certificates in your environment:   http://www.ehloworld.com/751.
    You may consider checking the template version of your certificate to see if that helps your situation, perhaps Geotrust can reissue you a v2 certificate if necessary.
    Further background info:  http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb931355(v=vs.85).aspx
    Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Hindson

Maybe you are looking for

  • Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

    Hello guys,     Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.    I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain

  • Check for entries on the selection screen

    if one of the select options is obligatory with no default value then the radio buttons does not work. Can anybody please let me know why. it is the same if i dont make the field obligatory but write code in at selection-screen on block with a error

  • Document type change for excise document

    Dear Experts, I would like to change the document type for excise invoice generated at the time of J1IIN. At present system is generating document type SA. I want to maintain different number range for these documents instead of SA document number. S

  • Can't create 4/3 ratio movies anymore!

    Am I missing something? It appears that this new iMovie (v10) forces you to create widescreen only projects. Gone is the 4/3 option (alongside with the number of frames per second) I have tons of home movies transfered from tapes (I am sure plenty of

  • Canon EOS 50D

    Just announced by Canon, the EOS50D. Relevance to this forum? US pricing in dollars is the same as price in euros, so yet another rip-off for loyal EU customers!