Detailed Design Architecture of SRM 5.5 with all components with interfaces

Hi All,
I am implementing SRM 5.5. Extended Classic Scenario with all Business Scenario's. We are using components are
1)      SRM, Bidding Engine and LAC in one server.
2)      SUS, Supplier Registration, cFolders in one server.
3)     SRM-MDM Server.
My Question is. I would like to know detailed Architecture of all the components and how it is integrating each other servers.
Is there any Interface between supplier registration and suppliers?, If yes, what is that and what for it.
If anyone has detailed Architecture design please share with me.
Highly appreciate for your help......
Awaiting for quick response.........
Thanks & Regards,
John.
Edited by: johnmiller465 on Aug 20, 2009 2:33 AM

Hi Masa,
Thanks for your response and awarded points. and I have another question.
We are Implementing SRM 5.5, Extended Classic Scenario for Goods and Services (Stock and Consumables).
I have 400 cost centers. How to assign G/L Accounts to multiple cost centers, in Define G/L Accounts for Account assignment category and Product category?.
I guess, By using BADI - BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT. If this is correct, Do we have to develop any ZTABLE for this. Or only BADI enough?.
Please anyone explain details.
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks & Regards,
John.

Similar Messages

I have a big crossbar mark over my FF4 icon after I've installed and replaced FF3. When I try to open the software, I get "You can't open the application "Firefox" because it is not supported on this architecture." What's up with that?

I have a big crossbar mark over my FF4 icon after I've installed and replaced FF3. When I try to open the software, I get "You can't open the application "Firefox" because it is not supported on this architecture." What's up with that?

Firefox 4 requires at least OS X 10.5 and an Intel Mac. There is a third party version of Firefox 4 that runs on OS X 10.4/10.5 and PPC Macs, for details see http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox
If you prefer, you can get the latest version of Firefox 3.6 from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

2013 Workflows created in SharePoint Designer doesn't seems to work with retension policy!

Hi Guys, 2013 Workflows created in SharePoint Designer doesn't seems to work with retension policy but 2010 workflows work. Any One have any details resaon or workarround?
Shafqat Balouch MCT, MCSA, MCSE MCITP, MCPD, Microsoft Partner

Hi ,
According to your description, I can reproduce your scenario in my SharePoint 2013.
For the Retention Policy, it will schedule how content is managed and disposed by specifying a sequence of retention stages. In SharePoint Designer Workflow 2013, we have looping option available. You can
use loop option and then pause for duration for achieving same function as Retention Policy to start a workflow.
Reference:
http://prasadtechtactics.blogspot.com/2012/07/sharepoint-designer-2013-workflows-part_24.html
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support,
contact [email protected]
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

Detail Designer for Job in Succession Planning!

Hi Luke,
I want to do some changes (like hiding button, removing or adding a tab) for 'Job' & 'Job Family' in details panel for Succession Planning. But I'm not able to see these objects in admin console of succession planning.
Do I need to make those changes through backend? If yes, please tell me the folder, where I can access relevant files & make the changes.
Thanks in advance!
Prashant

Hi Prashant,
The Job Family details panel can be edited in the AdminConsole. Go to the Positions module, select Job Families with Successors and then click Details Designer. After you changes make sure you go to the Profile section (the one after Details Designer) and click Copy From Details Designer so that your changes are also made in the Profile.
For the Job details panel you need to make changes at file level. The details panel presentation file controls the layout of the details panel. These are located in AppResources\detailspresentationconfiguration:
Job: SAPJobDetailsPresentation.xml
Job (Profile): SAPJobDetailsPresentationMoreDetails.xml
You may need to refer back to the details configuration to find the button section names. These are:
Job: SAPJobDetailsConfiguration.xml
Job (Profile): SAPJobMoreDetailsDetailsConfiguration.xml
Best regards,
Luke

I am just starting out in graphic design and I wanted to know how to get more involved with either adobe and or graphic design? I am really very interested in working with adobe and graphic design more and becoming more involved with both!!

I am just starting out in graphic design and I wanted to know how to get more involved with either adobe and or graphic design? I am really very interested in working with adobe and graphic design more and becoming more involved with both!!

I have now recently downloaded 10.0.2 which is confusing in itself, as, as far as I can ascertain that is actually version 11, but I'm not even sure about that.
Version 10.0.2 is the newest version and the successor to GarageBand '11 (version 6.0.5).
The '11 is referring to the iLife '11 suit of multimedia application - the older GarageBand was a part of this bundle.
Have a look at Edgar's graphical enhanced manuals, the explain very detailed how things work and why. You can buy them as iBooks from the iBook store or directly from the page:
http://DingDingMusic.com/Manuals/

About detailed design

what is detailed design what can we do

These two links would help the most -
1) This discusses the architecture:
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/guidelines/designing_enterprise_applications_2e/app-arch/app-arch.html
2) This discusses the implementation, and is a supplemental chapter:
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/guidelines/designing_enterprise_applications_2e/sample-app/sample-app1.3.1.html
There is also a pdf available on the main page of that book at:
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/guidelines/designing_enterprise_applications_2e/index.html

Guidelines for design/architecture review

I'm conducting a design/architecture review for a part of our system that needs seriously re-visiting. I'm going to be formally presenting the review and was hoping for a few pointers.
Does anybody have a set of guidelines they follow for such a review? Are there any suitable articles or books for me to refer to?
Thank you.

I'll probably be stating the obvious for you but:
- Direction Enterprise
      - what's on for the future
          - 6 mo
          - 12 mo
          - 2 yr
          - 5 yr
- Weak points of existing systems: (contrasted with Enterprise Direction)
      - Why: what makes it a week point
      - to what extent is it believed to impact current operation
      - how does it hinder future growth
- Prioritize Systems/Component replacements
      - imediate (right now)
      - short range (1 year)
      - middle      (2 years)
      - long range (5+ years)
- Return on Investments
      - try to quantify $ or empowerment to meeet Enterprise Direction
      - impact of doing nothing

Design / Architecture from Requirements

Is there a good article / book with real examples of how to arrive at a system design / architecture from requirements ??
Also, is there a defined way to organize the requirements captured so that it would be easy to translate it into design ?
We have captured our requirements from a data and process perspective. I have a hard time to organize them and break them up and to finally translate them into design.
Any pointers would be of great help to me.
Thanks !!!

Is there a good article / book with real examples of
how to arrive at a system design / architecture from
requirements ??There must be thousands.
Also, is there a defined way to organize the
requirements captured so that it would be easy to
translate it into design ?There must be thousands.
We have captured our requirements from a data and
process perspective. I have a hard time to organize
them and break them up and to finally translate them
into design.
Any pointers would be of great help to me.In what form have you "captured your requirements from a data and process perspective"? To me the output of requirement analysis is in the form of formally described test scenarios. That is, I distill User Stories (Use Cases from the user's point of view) from the verbal requirements, and derive scenarios from them; these scenarios are basically descriptions of acceptance tests.
Given that, I take the first (the most simple) of these user stories and break this up into as many independent, "atomic" tasks as possible. At the point I'm describing these I usually have a pretty good idea of what interfaces and classes will be needed, and I can start writing unit tests. Often, when I feel during "task analysis" I'm just literally writing in English what my test code will be, I skip formally describing them and just write the tests straight away.
When the unit tests are ready design is done, skeleton implementations are there and the rest of the code pretty much writes itself ;-)
Next story, same deal; always adding tests & refactoring & regression testing.
story -> scenarios -> acceptence tests
tasks (-> scenarios) -> unit tests
refactoring ->additional classes -> new unit tests
That's, in a nutshell, how I do it. As you can tell, this is leaning close to the eXtreme Programming way of working; and as you can equally tell, I believe strongly in test-driven development, designing from test code, and emergent design.
So if I were to point you to any articles or books, I'd tell you to aim your google at "extreme programming" and go from there. The first two hits will be the two main XP web sites.
As I said there are many different methodologies each covering more than just A->D, and a lot has been written about them. The above is my personal preference - you'll have to evaluate if it can be suitable for your project and team.
One final pointer (I'm going on aren't I) is this: whichever way of working you use, evaluate it constantly. For example, if you decide to make a lot of UML diagrams, evaluate the time spent vs the return. If your team feels there really isn't enough actual benefit, stop doing it; if they feel it does pay off, by all means keep doing it.

Design architecture Difficulty

Hello all. I'm having some difficulty comming up with a viable and stable design architecture for the problem listed below.
We are downloading 5 files from a server through TCP/IP.
Each file consist of say 20 parts/chunks.
Each part is further divided into chunks of say 15.
So, 15 chunks make 1 part. 20 parts make 1 file.
Each chunk is say 1MB where each part is about 15MB in size.
Now, we are downloading these files through 30 available TCP/IP connections.
Each connection can download 1 chunk at a time.
So, we have 30 chunks being downloaded in parallel through 30 TCP/IP connections.
So, 2 parts of a file (i.e. 30 chunks) are downloading at once.
User may pause the file being downloaded (i.e. file 1) and start downloading a different file (i.e. file 4).
Now, these 30 TCP/IP connections will have to abandon downloading file 1, and be reused to download file 4.
When file 4 is finished, the user decides to start downloading file 1 again. The progress of downloading file 1 should start from where it left off.
The progress may only be deleted when user Cancels the download.
Basically, the above section describes the jist of it. Any sugestions are appriciated.
Kas

I have no LV on this PC, however,
How about an array of cluster with chuck name / PostID#, priority weight and status (waiting for dl, in progress) , whenever a connection is free / a chunk download has finished, the element with the highest weight is downloaded.
Could also be a queue or a AE ....
Commandline controllable NNTP reader/ downloader may already (or should I say may still?) exist.
If bandwidth is limited and you have multiple downloaders, why not use a torrent like approach?
Still remember the time reading this forum with nn (or was it tin?) on a freebsd system connected via telnet to a DEC VT102
(here)
Greetings from Germany
Henrik
LV since v3.1
“ground” is a convenient fantasy
'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'

SRM 5.0 with XI 3.0

Hi ,
Can I integrate SRM 5.0 with XI 3.0.
Thanks & Regards,
krian.
Edited by: Kiran Ponnam on Jan 14, 2008 8:57 PM

Hi,
The Discussion will help you
SRM AND SAP XI
XI with SRM 4.0
Regards
Agasthuri Doss

SharePoint Designer 2013 after installation getting error with runtime i.e. error writing to file Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.Runtime.Local.Resources.dll Verify that you have access to that directory

SharePoint Designer 2013 after installation getting error with runtime i.e. error writing to file Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.Runtime.Local.Resources.dll Verify that you have access to that directory
after retry..again SharePoint Designer requires the following component require to install Microsoft.NET framework version 4 i have downloaded and try to installed but fail not work please answer what to do?
Thanks and Regards, Rangnath Mali

Hi Rangnath,
For running SharePoint Designer 2013, you need to install Microsoft .NET 4.0 Framework or higher.
Please uninstall the Microsoft .NET 4.0 Framework, and install it again. After that, reboot your machine.
Best Regards,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

SAP SRM 7.0 with ECC EHP 4 components to execute scenario

Hi All,
I am new to SAP SRM 7.0.Could you please let me know that what are all the components needs to be in place to execute the technical scenarios and business scenarios.I had an hands on experience on SAP SRM 5.0 with ECC 6.0 backend.
Some where i read that there are lot of configuration changes when we integrate SRM 7 with ECC EHP 4.Do we need to have PI 7 for executing Centralized contract and plan driven procurement scenario?Please guide me to have some exposure towards higher version.Thank you in advance.
Best Regards,
praveen

Hello,
You can refer the INSTALLATION AND UPGRADE INFORMATION , Master guides etc maintained at the below mentioned location which will answer all your query's here.
Goto URL http://service.sap.com/srm-inst and then navigate to SAP SRM --> SAP SRM Server 7.0 .
Best Regards,
Rahul

SRM 4.0 (with SRM Server 5.0) ---- XI 3.0-------R/3

Hello Friends
Iam also working in SRM. I want to integrate SRM and XI for sending a PO from SRM to third party system through XI. I already have a PO created in SRM and I want to send it through XI to Third party system and then want to create corresponding Sales Order in that system.
We are using SRM 4.0(with SRM Server5.0)and XI 3.0.
Thanks in Advance........

Hi <b>Narayana</b>!!
Treat SRM as another R/3 system and use the general flow logic. Create a Sender RFC to send the PO that you have created from SRM system using RFC sender adapter to XI.
Another way:
You can create a work flow which will trigger an IDOC once your PO is created and the IDOC will reach XI using ALE. You need to configure RFC destinations and partner Profiles etc.
Once your PO informations reaches XI you have to configure reciver adapter based on your third Party.
Lets say your third party system is a J2ee application or another R/3 system then you have to configure either a reciver http adapter or a Reciever RFC adapter.
I know this is quite generic......
Cheers!!
AnuraG

Central contract in SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0

Hi
We are using SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0
When we create contract in SRM 7.0 & Trying to distribute to Backend as Contract, It is showing error in BBP_PD as below
HEADER I1015 Awaiting Approval
HEADER I1021 Created
HEADER I1038 Complete
HEADER I1141 Released
HEADER I1180 Document Completed
HEADER I1193 In Distribution
HEADER I1195 Distribution Incorrect
0000000001 I1143 Item is Active
Badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSY is activated to define backend system
No IDOC is also generated.
No errors in MOnitor also
Not sure what is message type needs to define & what else is needed
Regards,
NNK

HI
Need to do following
1. Keep conidtion types in ECC & SRM same for contract.
2. Also Add message types BLAORD & COND_A manually in ECC in WE20.
Then only it works
Regards,
NNK

. . . was wondering: Would you happen to know if, Adobe CS5 Design Premium in compatible or incompatible with MS WIN8.1? I bought a new Dell XPS 9530 -- with NO CD drive. I copied my CS5 install disk to a Flash Drive, then ran the "install" on my new

. . . was wondering: Would you happen to know if, < Adobe CS5 Design Premium > in compatible or incompatible with MS WIN8.1? I bought a new Dell XPS 9530 -- with NO CD drive. I copied my CS5 install disk to a Flash Drive, then ran the "install" on my new computer. I had the ownership S/N, so-o-o-o, CS5 installed and "seems" to respond well. PROBLEM: PhotoShop. The Menu Bar, the Commands, the Tool Bar, the Color Palettes, and etc., etc., are all real small on my display -- I would estimate they are about 1/3 of the normal size. Same problem with Illustrator. I've made all the Screen Resolution and Print-Size settings and nothing remedies the small display. (My working page is fine; it's just the display that is REAL tiny!!) Can you help me? Do you have any suggestions for me to try? Should I re-install from the internet? Am I forced to upgrade my application? I appreciate any comments you might have. Thanks. -- Dennis

@saratogacoach,
The key log entry is the following:
Feature: Microsoft_VC90_CRT_x86_
Action 10:31:26: PublishProduct. Publishing product information
[ 5888] Thu May 06 10:31:27 2010 INFO
.An error occurred during the installation of assembly component {43CC1B37-B20C-3EBC-9C04-F809989E4FD3}. HRESULT: 0x80073712.
Action ended 10:31:27: InstallFinalize. Return value 3.
First, see if this hotfix maybe applicable to your system
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946927
or this one:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902330

Detailed Design Architecture of SRM 5.5 with all components with interfaces

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for