Dev and qual systems

hi guys
I need to do some changes to one query and make it available in PrOD.My client has only DEV,QUAL,PROD in landscape.I thought of making changes to query in QUAL and see if it gives expected results and try doing this in DEV.....as I am afraid I may spoil existing query in DEV if I donot get extected results...is there anything wrong to do like that....
Rgds
s h

You can do that, but dont change the original query directly in any system if you have doubt that it disturbs.. Always take a back up.
You can create a copy of the query (Y-query) in developement system, do whatever changes you want to do in copy query and test. If the results are fine, reflect the changes in original query and move to quality and production.
If you want to test in quality system, you can even transport the test query also once.

Similar Messages

Is ST-PI and ST-A/PI needs to be installed in DEV and Quality Systems.

Environment:
ERP and BI 6.0 / Windows / SQLServer 2005
Hi All,
Is ST-PI and ST-A/PI needs to be applied to DEV and Quality Systems of ERP and BW.
I understand that ST-PI and ST-A/PI are necessary for Production Environment.
Is it recommended to install or upgrade the same in Dev and Quality Systems of ERP and BW.
Because I believe it is always good practice to keep all systems Support Packages including ST-PI and ST-A/PI the same in the same Landscape. (But could not find any documents from SAP.)
Thanks and Best Regards,
Raghunahth L.

Hi Raghu,
you can get into the problems which I have said if you dont implement that,also many support packs do have their dependencies on ST-PI and ST-A/PI and seriously I havent heard people implementing this on prod and not dev and qa....I have worked on with many big clients but never heard this
Also if you ignore whatever I have said,still it is still recommended that you never apply anything directly on Production,It is always better if you first implement on dev and qa and see if you are facing any issues while implementing...so its always better to implement on dev and then qa
and It doesnt take too much of time,so that should not be an issue after all
Always follow SAP best Practices
Rohit

TOBJ entries missing from upgrade dev and test systems

Hi,
We are in the process of ECC Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and upgraded our dev and test systems. We missing some SAP defined object entries in TOBJ table from dev and test. Because of this some of the roles getting transport errors if the roles contain those missing objects. We tried to transport the missing entries but we don't see any provision for that. Does any one through an idea to move those missing entries from dev to test. Not sure we will get same error in production. This table updates during upgrade and may be we missed some thing in test as though we followed the same upgrade process for both systems.
Thank you
Venkat

Possibly you are no longer licensed for components which these objects are called from in their concepts.
In that case the ability to start the component objects should be removed as well.
Of course if some Z-programs checked these objects or SAP's own "package concept" extended syntax checks did not respect them then you might have problems.
This should normally only apply to manual authorization instances, as if you had upgraded the roles and regenerated them, then you would not have this problem (in the roles).
It tells us something about how you or someone else without any training have built these roles (or subsequently mucked them up...)...
When reading stuff like this, I am always of two minds...
1) SAP should make the concepts simpler and more intuitive to use without "cowboy" activities allowed by users with SAP_ALL etc.
2) Customers should bleed for their own sins for not training people appropriatly (here, faking CV's is also ma major pest!).
It is always a bit of a cat & mouse game and ends up in forums such as SDN in the long run.
Some of it might also have become "available" to be used by SAP (I believe it was the 6.20 upgrade which installed everything...).
Real bugger. I would accept it and test as best you can. You can also compare "where.used-lists" and "code scans" before and after the upgrade to see whether it is used by foreign repository objects.
The scan is more reliable here, as sometimes the object name itself is a variable from a data declaration or condition which you cannot see in the "procedural" code.
Cheers,
Julius

Consistency between dev and prod systems!!!!

Hi All,
I wuld like to check the consistency between Dev and Prod systems for all the Data model and other objects existing. I would like to do this sanity check to see whether the two systems are in sync. Are there any tools or transaction codes within SAP framework which can guide me in this direction.
Kind Regards,
Surya Tamada.

Hi Surya ,
First build whole data flow :
1 .Create Infoarea ,Infoobjects & Masterdata ,Infoproviders ,Infoobject Catelog under Infoarea,MetaData - Characteristics MeteData - Key Figures
2 DSOs ,Infocubes ,Infosets, Multiproviders ,Views in the development system ,Datasources for BW system,Flat File Datasources,Transformations
then get data from the se11 tables as per your requirement :
like RSDVCHA ,RSDBCHATR,RSDCUBEIOBJ,RSDICMULTIIOBJ etc and built view on it as per your requirement .
then built flat file data sources and transformation .
get all data downloaded to flat file in ur PC .In the same way from other system.
make flow from PC File Datasource -> DSO -> Infocube and build queries for different objects .load the downloaded files to them and then run query .
ex : query to compare cube will take cube name and systems name as input and compare objects .
Regards,
Jaya

Different Recipients of Alerts in DEV and PRD Systems.

Dear All
I wanted to know if it is possible to configure different set of recipients for an alert category in XI DEV and XI PRD systems.
For example i have two groups "Group A" and "Group B" which should recieve alert mails.For this ,
we can create 2 different roles in XI DEV i.e. "Role_A" and "Role_B" and assign user id's to these roles and then assign these roles to Alert Category using the "Recipients Via User Roles" option .This is done in XI DEV system.
My question is it possible that alert mails are just sent to "Role_B" in the XI PRD system. (not to ROLE_A). As ideally we would be transporting the alert categories from DEV> QAS> PRD can we have different recipients configurations in DEV and PRD.
Please suggest.
regards
Nilesh.

Hi Nilesh,
Yes it is possible, Just change the receipent of alert category on PRD system (you can change receipent anytime you want).
Regards,
Gourav
reward points if it helps you

DataSource / Structures mismatched between Dev and Test Systems. ..!!

Hi,
We are doing a scenario. Where XI will update the data into PSA through ABAP proxy.
Scenario worked perfectly in development system.
We transported the objects from Dev to test. The Strucures are mismatched in SE11 between development and Test systems as below.
Data sources (ZDS_RECIHDR and ZDS_RECTPALL) looks ok. But when I saw the structures in SE11 they are not correct, they got mismatched.
Development:
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
Test:
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
Kindly let me know where it might have gone wrong?
Thanks
Deepthi

We done it already. Still it is failing.
While transporting, it is failing and showing the error as
Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZSALENUM', but there is a component called
Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZTRANDATE', but there are the following com
The Structure is mismatched in SE11 between header and allocation structures. That is the reason it is failing.
Any more ideas pls?

Setup DEV and QA Systems at EWA Administration

Hi Guys,
I configure some landscapes in my Solution Manager, all of the has DEV, QA and Prod.
When I access transaction Solution Manager -> Settings -> Solution Monitoring -> EWA Administration I just can see Production Systems.
How can I insert lines for Devs and QA?
Thanks,
Periandro

Hello Periandro,
Please use the following link which says Solution Manager 4.0 - How to Generate EWAu2019s from Satellite Systems to download a document
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0f35bf3-14a3-2910-abb8-89a7a294cedb
Also go through the following link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/4d/19d3b424f34e239051b89afc37497d/frameset.htm
I hope it is helpful.
Cheers,
Satish.

Does two seperate client required if the solman monitors DEV and QAS system

Hi All,
This is our client landscape:
1 Dev-SolMan->For all development and quality systems(ECC 6.0, BI and EP).
1 PRD-SolMan->For all production systems(ECC 6.0, BI and EP).
Note: We have build only DEV-SolMan system as of now and we haven't done any configuration yet like either service desk or ChaRm.
The question is:
Do we need to have two seperate clients in DEV-Solman, one for all development systems and one for all quality systems? or Can we have a single client in DEV-Solman to handle all development and quality systems? What is the SAP recommented approach?
Thanks
Sanjai

Hi,
you even don't need separate Solution Manager systems to monitor DEV / QA and Prod. You could use one SolMan client to monitor and administrate all systems / clients.
Maybe it would be a good idea to create different Solution Landscapes, but this depends on your need.
Separate clients are no good option, because CHARM can only activated in on client. Also if you plan to activate charm, you need a solution that contains all systems in your transport landscape (DEV, QAnad Prod).
Kind Regards,
Holger

Multiple Dev and Qas systems in STMS

Hi all,
I have a scenarios with two Dev clients (ABAP, and Config), and multiple Qas clients with a single Target. I would like to configure the System Landscape (Logical Components), and Project with the relevant client paths.
We have two Paths:
1. Dev_1 (ABAP), Qas (Integration_1, Integration_2), Refresh_1), Prd
2. Dev_2 (Config) [Dev_1, Dev_3, Dev_4, Dev_5] (Target Group), Qas (Integration_1, Integration_2), Prd
Could anyone throw some lights on TMS configuration, configuration of Target Groups in SMSY (Logical Components), and Project creation.
I searched the forum but couldn't find proper solution.
I would appreciate your response.
Thanks,
-Mike.
Message was edited by:
        Mike S
Message was edited by:
        Mike S
Message was edited by:
        Mike S

Hi,
Your existing TMS of your satellite systems will not be disturbed until you want to configure ChaRM.
just create two logical components as you have mentioned.
Here's the <a href="https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700004860082004E.sim">Link</a> on how to create Logical Componant in SMSY.
Feel Free to revert back.
--Ragu

Organization unit ID is different in Dev and Quality Systems

Hi Experts,
We have downloaded the Organizational Structure from ECC in the Dev System, Sales organizations, Sales offices and sales groups were created with number range Assigned to Current Active Plan version. but the number for the Sales orgs started with 50000026 instead of starting with 50000001. And in the Quality again we have downloaded the Org. structure from ECC, now the IDs were created starting from 50000007. this causing the inconsistencies in the Qualtiy System like, Pricing procedures are not getting determined.
why the Ids were created from 50000026 instead of 50000001.
What are best practices to have the same ID for Organizational Units in both the Systems?
Thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

Hi Kiran,
thanks for responses,
Now we are planning to delete the Org. Structure in Quality and planning transport if from Development. What is best approach to save the Org. model in Transport request and move to Quality. I came to know about the report RHMOVE30, will it be used for transporting from Dev to Quality?
One more thing, if we transfer the Org data to Quality will it take the same no. in Quality. I have doubt, If Dev Org Id were created from 50000026 and Quality it will start from 50000000.
Kindly help me,
thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

Wage type characteristics variation in Dev and PRD system

Hi All,
We have a wage type for ex: 9501, We will be entering the WT in infotype 15 and the in the payslip it will be in payments section.
When I enter value 50 in DEV system, it is showing 50 in payslip under payments section but in PRD system the same scenario reacts as 46.53 in the payslip when we enter 50 in infotype 15. Not sure why it is behaving in such a way, any ideas?
With Regards,
Giriesh M

Hi Sikindar,
Thank you for the respond. I have checked where it get changed and it was happening in GVAL. Later I find out that it is based on /801 splits ( it has 2 splits and based on the first record it was producing such result). As I am new to functional side it is bit struggle to know from where I have to analyse. Your suggestions helped me to find out. Thanks a lot.
With Regards,
Giriesh M

Source System Mapping between BW Dev and Prod system

Hi,
I have a DB Connect Source System in BW Dev system called DBSRCDEV which points to one of our Oracle Dev DB.
In Production, the DB Connect Source System is called DBSRCPROD and it points to the corresponding Oracle Prod DB.
In Development, I created a data source on this Source System (DBSRCDEV) and I tried to transport it to Production. But it failed with error saying that DBSRCDEV does not exist.
Where and how can I maintain or configure the mapping between DBSRCDEV and DBSRCPROD Source System so that I can transport my data source to Production?
Please help.
Thanks,
CH

Hi,
usually you need to maintain the setting for the change of the logical system name (source system) in each target system of a transport. So in your prod system goto rsa1->tools->change logical system names...
After maintaining that table, try to import your request again.
regards
Siggi

System Properties user.timzone different between dev. and prod. system

Hi all,
I am facing the following issue:
In our development system I get in http://<server:port>/sap/monitoring/SystemProperties -> dispatcher -> system properties a Europe/Berlin for user.timezone.
In our productive system I get in http://<server:port>/sap/monitoring/SystemProperties -> dispatcher -> system properties a GMT for user.timezone.
Can anybody explain which system property is requested by the J2EE-engine when calling this property?
I ask, because I wrote a small programm requesting the user.property via java (expecting j2ee-engine would do that too) an got back an empty string (on both systems).
So, how/where can I change the parameter, so that the development system uses GMT, too?
I already checked the spro settings in sap, they are identical. System -> status showes the same for both systems, too.
I hope for your help.
Thanks and regards
Christian

Hello Chris,
I checked the system variables with TA SM51 ->goto -> server -> information -> environment.
There is nothing like the TZ variable on both systems (we use Linux).
Do you have an other idea?
How can I change the user.timezone shown in Java system properties?
Regards
Christian

SAP Script Problem in output in DEV and QA systems

Hi all,
I'm working on Bill of Lading form. we tested the form well in development system and moved it to QA. It gives me spacing issues in QA. few columns moved out of their designated area etc... The point to be noted is I have given fixed length of characters to be printed.. For eg: i have given delivery as vbeln(10), PO # as bstkd(35)..and so on.. Not sure why it has the problem still. Any inputs are highly appreciated. Please help me with this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
Perhaps this is simply a problem with the Sapscript buffers. You can
run the report RSTXDELL on the system to clear the Sapscript buffers.
It is a good idea to do the refresh procedures after any updates
concerning font metrics, device types etc...
To do this you can use RSTXDELL report with default settings except it
is better to have * instead of the current client number in the Client
field.
After this can you please create some new spools and the problem should
be resolved. It will not work to reprint an old spool as the contained
data is already incorrect.
Regards,
David

OSS Patch Comparison between DEV and PRD systems

Hi All,
Can you provide me the steps how to compare SNOTE applied in BI Development and BI Production.
Thanks & Regards,
Jelina

check this
OSS Note Patch Implemented?
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/472443f2-0c01-0010-20ab-fbd380d45881?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true

Dev and qual systems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for