Develop with NDWI 7.0 for Web AS 6.40 - Import Required Software Components

Hello,
I use NWDI 7.0 (NW 2004s).
In SLD i have created a software component. This component should run on Web AS 6.40. I have add the dependencies for Build Tool 6.40, Engine 6.40 an Tech Services 6.40.
I have create a track in CMS. I see the dependencies 3 for Web AS 6.40. In Transport Studio I must ceckin the 3 sca for this dependencies. I see the files but they are version 7.0!!!
Can I import the files for 7.0 or must I import the files for 6.40?
If I must import the files for 6.40: Where can I get the 3 files? I have no old jdi-system based on 6.40.
Greetings
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
you have to import the 6.40 files. This is described in SAP note 891223.
You need to have access to SAP service marketplace to download the files.
If you have an older 6.40 NWDI installation you can alternativly copy the files from that installation to the JTrans/CMS/indox folder of the new NWDI.
Regards
Helmut

Similar Messages

  • Are all of the fonts that come with Dreamweaver CS6 licensed for web use?

    Are all of the fonts that come with Dreamweaver CS6 licensed for web use?

    I also have Creative Suite 5, which I believe comes with an Adobe set of fonts. Are these all licensed?
    Licensed?  Yes, but not necessarily for the web. Some licenses allow use in print or images but not the web.
    Custom Web Fonts
    For legal reasons, don't just assume you can use any font you wish on the web. Fonts are protected by intellectual property laws in much the same way that software is protected from unlawful copying, modifying or distributing. In other words, a font owner can say "Sure, you can use my font but you can't alter it, you can't reproduce it and you can't distribute it." On the web, that's a deal breaker because you need to be able to do all three.
    These font-families are common to most Windows/Mac systems. 
    CSS Font Stack: Web Safe and Web Font Family with HTML and CSS code.
    Adobe Edge and TypeKit Web Fonts are licensed for use on the web.
    Free fonts, web fonts | Download free Adobe Edge Web Fonts trial
    Typekit
    Nancy O.

  • Removing Exif Data with out using "Save for Web"

    I have very large files.  I need to remove thw EXIF data.  I do not want to use "save for web" because it impacts the quality and size (recompresses) of the files.  I need the files to remain un changed except for the removal of the EXIF data.
    I have a large number of files to do this to.
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks

    Thanks Tai Lao for the shortcuts. 
    I have RAW files to start.  I "process" them and convert to jpg.  Then send them to the client.  But there are times the client doesn't need to be able to view the EXIF data, soooo....
    1. I'm working on seting up an action to convert the processed RAW files to TIFF first,
    2. then, using the shortcuts you listed, set up an action to take the tiff files through the process to strip them of the EXIF data and,
    3. then convert the resulting "EXIF-less" TIFF files to jpg - also using an action.  I'm going to try to build one action to do the whole thing but so far I'm still experimenting... I have to keep the file names...
    Anyway, I'll post my findings.
    Thanks
    To whomever left the info about Exiftool - Thanks for that info as well.  I'll check it out but is seems a bit too complicated for large numbers of files.

  • How to apply a user style with the Stylish extension for Web Developer Tools?

    I have firefox 27 and the fonts of Web Developer Tools (Inspector, Debugger..) are very small.
    The fonts of Stylish editor are very small also.
    Here https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/943857 I found a similar question.
    GingerBread Man said :
    "If you need to modify anything else, you can use the DOM Inspector extension to examine user interface elements ("chrome"). "
    My problem is that I can't find the names of elements e.g "chrome://browser/content/devtools/markup-view.xhtml"

    @the-edmeister
    Thanks for your reply.
    The rule below affects only Inspector
    @namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);
    @-moz-document url("chrome://browser/content/devtools/markup-view.'''xhtml'''") {
    .devtools-monospace {
    font-size: 120% !important;
    I change the rule as you suggest.
    @-moz-document url("chrome://browser/skin/devtools/markup-view.css") { ......}
    It doesn't work.

  • Few questions on exporting out with fce 3.5 for web distribution

    Hello I have been trolling here for a few months reading up on things and I know my way around a search pretty well I have gotten some of these answers from reading but id like to have my own thread so I can keep it all in one place...
    First..
    I run websites that need video's for surfers to be able to view.. these videos are in length from 20 min to 1 hour or longer... now I have figured out that when I render with the h.264 out sorry fce calls it export... I choose the quicktime setting of lan and it seems to be about right for what im used to in high quality from rendering out with pinnacle studio for a wmv or an mpeg.. now heres where I get confused with fce
    I see there is a wmv setting to export to.. but when I do it.. it only exports a bit of it...
    now these are the formats I want for video...
    .mov
    .wmv
    .mpg
    I have compressor but I have no idea on the settings in there and can't find what I need
    in those formats I would like to have a
    high
    med
    low
    as far as quality go's
    can someone help me out so my life is easier please... in fact I have 50 bucks via paypal if I can get someone get my settings down right maybe even in compressor so I just have to edit... this part always messes with my head when it comes down to render out...
    there has to be some editors on here that know excatly what im talking about without having to say it on here... if you want to chat in private you can email me chris (at) themibcorp (dot) com I will give you my ichat name from there maybe you can help me and ill help you with some paypal
    I want the video to play on all forms of computers..
    our's and the other kind.. LOL

    This isn't something someone can decide for you. It's up to you ti make up your mind. Either will do the job. If you want to spend the time to experiment with settings to better suit your media and you know what you're doing and want to spend the money get the more expensive version. If you'll be happy to use the basic presets based on average media and file sizes then get the cheaper version.

  • Why do I get parsing errors with my WSDL URL for Web Services usage

    Hi,
    I am puzzled with the errors I get when I want to create a Web Service datastore.
    Scenario: I have created a SAP Web Service from CRM using SOAMANAGER. The WSDL URL produced by SOAMANAGER is accessibile when pasting the URL directly in Internet Explorer. WSDL URL [http://UXCIQ0M.WDF.SAP.CORP:50076/sap/bc/srt/wsdl/srvc_CBDCB34C89C29304E10000000A4282C0/wsdl11/allinone/ws_policy/document?sap-client=504]
    When using the WSDL URL in the Web Service datastore URL field, I get the error An error occurred while importing metadata: WSDLException; faultcode=PARSER_ERROR: Problem parsing: The element type "br" must be terminated by matching tag "/br". (BODI-1111469) (BODI-1112446)
    When I save the WSDL defintion in a local file and use a local file path, I get the errors An error occurred while importing metadata: WSDLException (at /wsdl:definitions/wsdl:portype/wsp:Policy): faultcode=INVALID_WSDL: Encountered unexpected element 'Policy. (BODI-1111469) (BODI-1112446)
    My questions:
    - Why do I get different parsing errors despite the fact that the XML is the same?
    - The WSDL is generated by SOAMANAGER. Shouldn't it work directly when integrating with Web Services generated from an SAP environment?
    - Is this related to confiurgation issue? I have set the Job Manager to Support adapter, message broker and SNMP communication
    - What is the difference between the datastore of type Adapter and the datastore Web Service? In the white paper [http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/boc/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20bd5e60-11f9-2b10-2bbb-b5109cceff08?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true] it is mentioned to use the Adapter type to consume a Web Service. It is not clear to me why we have those 2 types.
    Thanks & Best Regards
    Isabelle

    Some updates on this issue, which might help others in the community.
    - Data Service doesn't support ws_policy.
    - SAP NetWeaver 7.0 SOAMANAGER generate WDSL with ws_policy. In future releases, it is possible to specify not to use ws_policy
    - In most cases, replacing ws_policy with standard  in the URL directly, works. It doesn't work with Data Services :(.
    - Replacing ALL ws_policy in the XML directly is currently the only way to have the WSDL definition being parsed properly by Data Services.

  • Final Cut Exp - Working with HDV format & exporting for web in 16:9 format

    I'm working with SONY HVR-A1U prosumer camcorder which captures footage in 1440x1080resolution. My goal is to produce movies fro web in 16:9 size and upload them on "Brightcove" website
    After editing this footage in Final Cut Express I'm trying now to export my movie using "File-Export-Using Quick Time Conversion" option ... and I ran into the big issue with video size settings and how the video gets squezed when uploaded on Brightcove website.
    To get 16:9 size out of FCE, I need to:
    Set the "custom" size 640x360 and set "preserve aspect ration" - use letter box
    Then the resulting movie plays as 16:9 in Quicktime ... however after uploading it on Brightcove it chages the aspect again ... and becomes squashed.
    I would appreciate any advice how to overcome this "squashing" of export when working with HDV footage.
    Thanks
    Peter

    hI(Bonjour)!
    Try this link:
    http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/qt_movies_fromfcp.html
    May be it's a problem with the web interface programation on your upload site?
    Michel Boissonneault

  • Shooting with eos rebel t2 for web

    Greetings,
    I am fairly new to film editing and have played around with imovie with footage taken with the imac's monitor camera and am ready to use a cannon e2's footage. I'm using the video to make a commercial on my website. I'm using dreamweaver for the site.
    I want to have high quality footage on my site. I am using flv crunch to convert the imovie video into flv. FLV files are nescessary, as far as I know, for uploading video to a dreamweaver site.
    I understand that each file conversion significantly reduces the quality of video.
    Question: What would be the best way to get my Imovie to the site?
    Right now it's ::: Imovie TO Save w/ quicktime TO FLV (via FLV crunch) TO my site (via dreamweaver)
    Many Thanks in advance

    You should be quite fine compressing your video to h.264, as Flash is able to play that codec and it offers the best quality/file size ratio.
    You may need to change the extension of your compressed Quicktime file to .flv but I'm not 100% sure about that.
    mish

  • Need assistance with editing/resizing/exporting for web based images

    Camera: Nikon D7100
    Using 14-bit RAW
    So somehow I've failed to notice that when I export after editing and using the resize option (to 2000x2000), the quality of the resulting JPEG is soft and lacking in detail/clarity that exists in the image in LR. Even when I export it without resizing, leaving it in the natively taken resolution, the clarity and sharpness is gone. I've tried using the sharpen for screen settings but it doesn't fix the basic issue of the softness/clarity. I thought it might be the JPG view I was using (the default photo viewer in windows 8), so I reimported it back into lightroom but it shows the same lack of clarity/sharpness.
    Attached is a sample of the issue. One is a screenshot of how it looks in LR, the other how it exports. 100% Quality, 72 resolution (have tried the default of 240 and it didn't change anything), sRGB color space.
    Am I doing something wrong with the export process?

    I stated in the original post that I was using the default windows 8 viewer (Windows Photo Viewer). However, when I reimported the JPG back into LR, it looked the same as when I viewed it with the photo viewer.

  • Possible Problem with Save for Web and Devices?

    II've come here to the forum for some insight on why a gif file created by save for web and devices command is not showing up as an image in an uploading dialog box for my website.  I'm buildiing my website with word press and a custom freelancer theme.  I've created a customized header with Illustrator and have been saving the file with the save for web and devices command.  Once I have my gif file, I go to my theme uploader and try to upload the gif image and place it on my homepage.  I've not had any problems with doing this until yesterday, when I tried to upload an updated file.  What usually happens is that the thumbnail image shows up in the dialog box, I select my options, and click insert.  But what's started happening yesterday is that the thumbnail does not show up, unless I click on edit image.  This makes no difference, as when I click insert and go to my homepage and refresh it, the header doesn't show up.  I've tried working with the developer of the theme to resolve this problem and so far we've not found a solution.  I've tried to upload the header with different file types: jpg, png, tiff, but they don't work.  I thought I'd come here to see if anyone might have some suggestions.  The problem may not be with Illustrator's save for web and devices, but I thought I'd give this forum a shot.  Thanks for any and all respones. :[

    CT,
    If you can see and open the GIF/whatever (with any viewing application), the Illustrator Save for Web&Devices works. If not, you may ask about it in the Illustrator forum:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/illustrator/illustrator_general?view=discussions
    If the image is there, to have the issue solved quickly, I believe you should ask in a forum covering the web building application.

  • Looking for SAP Developer with HR/Payroll experience

    Hi All,
    We are currently recruiting for an SAP developer with HR/Payroll experience for a permanent role in Canada.
    For more details please email me at [email protected]

    I need a functional consultant that has done configuration in SAP HR Payroll.
    Michelle Yang
    Vice President
    Direct(925) 989-7337
    [email protected]

  • Preview options in the "save for web" dialog

    According to the reference, the previews in the "save for web" dialog are there only for showing how the image can be seen on various platforms with different gamma values.
    But, if we open a non-sRGB image (ProPhoto for example) by the "save for web" option, the preview options (other than the "use document profile) in the "save for web" dialog assign sRGB color space to the image even when the "convert to sRGB" option is unchecked ... this causes unrealistic, dull previews for the image.
    What is the reason behind that PS assigns sRGB to the image previews if we uncheck "convert to sRGB" option?

    Basically, how animation works with GIF and Save for Web in PSE is that each layer in your document is a frame of animation. So you see one layer, then the next, and so on. You should not see the contents of the last frame/layer when looking at the current/next frame of the animation.
    Could you post a screen shot of your layers panel and give us a link to the GIF that is coming out of Save for Web?

  • Blurry smart objects in Photoshop Save for Web jpegs

    I create graphs, etc in Illustrator, place them as Smart Objects in a master Photoshop file before outputing Save for Web jpegs to use as PowerPoint slide backgrounds. Everything created in Illustrator or Photoshop through that process (Quality 80 or 100 with any of the SfW options on or off) Save for Webs are blurry when imported (at 100%) into PowerPoint. The only way I have been able to get anything crisp in PowerPoint was saving a Photoshop pdf. However, that was only the text created in Photoshop. The Illustrator Smart Object part was still blurry. Anyone have any idea on the best process to combine Photoshop and Illustrator files into one file for import into PowerPoint as a clean, crisp background? At this point I am open to all suggestions.

    There are parts that are being added in Photoshop, hence going from Illustrator through Photoshop as a Smart Object and then onto PowerPoint. If I wasn't 5 months down the line and just nearing deadline, I would recreate everything in Illustrator. Assuming that I have to continue at this point down the Illustrator through Photoshop line of working, how do you designate pngs or jpegs to be 220ppi. Jpegs have a 1-12 quality (and 12 is still blurry).
    Note regarding PowerPoint, I embed the full-page image into the background so others that are using this can't move (by accident or on purpose) the background.

  • Error when trying to "Save for Web"

    I, like others have the same problem in Photoshop Elements 6 editor when trying to "Save for Web". I get an error: 
    could not complete the export command because of a program error
    I've searched the forum, but it seems like no one has found a solution.
    I have a new PC with Windows 7 on it. It's Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit. i5 processor, 16GB RAM and plenty of HD space.
    I am running Photoshop Elements 6.
    When I used the same version of Photoshop Elements 6 on my old XP computer, I didn't have this problem.
    Adobe Photoshop Elements Language Version: 6.0 (6.0 (20070910.r.377499))
    Operating System: Windows Vista
    Version: 6.1 Service Pack 1
    System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:10, Stepping:9 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP
    Physical processor count: 4
    Built-in memory: 15822 MB
    Free memory: 11064 MB
    Memory available to Photoshop: 1621 MB
    Memory used by Photoshop: 55 %
    Image cache levels: 6
    Serial number: 10571087952197841429
    Application folder: D:\Program Files\Adobe Photoshop Elements\
    Temporary file path: C:\Users\Roger\AppData\Local\Temp\
    Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
    Scratch volume(s):
      C:\, 111.7G, 76.2G free
    Primary Plug-ins folder: D:\Program Files\Adobe Photoshop Elements\Plug-Ins\
    Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
    Installed plug-ins:
       3D Transform 10.0 (10.0x001)
       ADM NO VERSION
       ASDStrm NO VERSION
       Accented Edges 9.0
       Angled Strokes 9.0
       Auto Divide 6.0.0.0 (6.0 (20070910.r.377499))
       Average 10.0 (10.0x001)
       BMP 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Bas Relief 9.0
       Camera Raw 4.2
       Chalk & Charcoal 9.0
       Charcoal 9.0
       Chrome 9.0
       Clouds 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Color Halftone 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Color Variations 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Colored Pencil 9.0
       CompuServe GIF 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Conditional Mode Change 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Conté Crayon 9.0
       Correct Camera Distortion 9.0
       Craquelure 9.0
       Crop and Straighten Photos Filter 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Crosshatch 9.0
       Crystallize 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Cutout 9.0
       Dark Strokes 9.0
       De-Interlace 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Difference Clouds 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Diffuse Glow 9.0
       Displace 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Dry Brush 9.0
       Extrude 10.0 (10.0x001)
       FastCore Routines 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Fibers 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Film Grain 9.0
       Filmstrip 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Filter Gallery 9.0
       Frame From Video 6.0
       Fresco 9.0
       Generic EPS 10.0
       Glass 9.0
       Glowing Edges 9.0
       Grain 9.0
       Graphic Pen 9.0
       Halftone Pattern 9.0
       Ink Outlines 9.0
       JPEG 2000 2.0
       Lens Flare 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Lighting Effects 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Liquify 7.0
       MMXCore Routines 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Magic Extractor 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Matlab Operation 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Mezzotint 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Mosaic Tiles 9.0
       Multiprocessor Support 10.0 (10.0x001)
       NTSC Colors 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Neon Glow 9.0
       Note Paper 9.0
       Ocean Ripple 9.0
       OnEdge 1, 0, 0, 1
       PCX 10.0 (10.0x001)
       PNG 10.0 (10.0x001)
       PNG Icons 1.22x1
       Paint Daubs 9.0
       Palette Knife 9.0
       Patchwork 9.0
       Photocopy 9.0
       PhotomergeUI 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Picture Package Filter 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Pinch 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Pixar 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Plaster 9.0
       Plastic Wrap 9.0
       Pointillize 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Polar Coordinates 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Poster Edges 9.0
       Radial Blur 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Read Watermark 1.70.19
       Reticulation 9.0
       Ripple 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Rough Pastels 9.0
       Save for Web 3.0
       ScriptingSupport 10.0
       Shear 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Smart Blur 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Smudge Stick 9.0
       Solarize 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Spatter 9.0
       Spherize 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Sponge 9.0
       Sprayed Strokes 9.0
       Stained Glass 9.0
       Stamp 9.0
       Straighten Image 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Straighten and Crop Image 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Sumi-e 9.0
       Targa 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Texture Fill 10.0 (10.0x001)
       TextureSelect 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Texturizer 9.0
       Tiles 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Torn Edges 9.0
       Twain Acquire 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Twain Select 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Twirl 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Underpainting 9.0
       WIA Support 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Water Paper 9.0
       Watercolor 9.0
       Wave 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Wind 10.0 (10.0x001)
       Wireless Bitmap 10.0 (10.0x001)
       ZigZag 10.0 (10.0x001)
    Plug-ins that failed to load: NONE
    Installed TWAIN devices:
       WIA-HP Scanjet 4800 series

    I also tried the alt/ctrl/shift buttons when clicking Editor in the Photoshop welcome screen. It did ask if I wanted to reset the preferences. I chose yes. I still get the same error message when trying to save for web.
    Below....showing I don't have a "save for web" folder on my C drive.
    And below, showing the same error after pressing alt/shift/ctrl when clicking on editor and clearing the preferences.
    I don't have a 'Save for Web' folder anywhere on my C: drive. I searched and came up with no folder with the text "save for web" in it.
    I did find a "save for web" folder on my D: drive and deleted that.. but now when I start up Photoshop, the option for Save for Web is grayed out...not able to select it.

  • A different take on the "Save For Web" color shift issue...

    Ok, everyone who has fussed much with photoshop and "Save For Web" knows about the color shift issue. If you want your colors to look right after you "save for web", you have to work in the sRGB colorspace, and have Proof Colors checked (soft proofing on) and the proof color setup set to Monitor RGB, otherwise what you get looks terrible when displayed in a browser.
    But of course if you are editing for print, this is exactly what you DON'T want to do. Well, I work in both. In fact, often the same images, and I want them to appear as close as reasonably possible in both print and web formats, and without a lot of fussing on my part. And I'm pickiest about the print mode, since I have the most control there, so that's the way I want to edit by default.
    Nothing new here.
    Now comes the interesting part (in my mind, anyway). Obviously there is a known remapping -- because PhotoShop DOES it when you select Proof Colors. So the inverse mapping must also be known (with some gamut issues, but I'm not concerned with those, because, after all, I'm VIEWING it on a monitor anyway!). What I want is a plug-in that automatically applies that inverse mapping so that, when I do a Save For Web, I end up with the colors I've been viewing all the time when setting the shot up in print mode. Then, too, I don't have to worry about what mode I'm in when I'm editing -- it just fixes it when doing a save-for-web.
    Again, I want to edit in my normal print mode (typically ProPhoto colorspace, and with soft-proofing off or set to the printer/medium combination I expect to use), then do a single operation (might be a multi-step action) to "screw up" my colors so that when I then do a "Save-For-Web", the resulting image, when viewed on the average color-stupid browser, looks like the image I've been seeing in Photoshop.
    Anyone know of such a beast?   I would gladly pay for a plug-in that really works and fixes the problem.
    And if you have other solutions, I'm interested, but the absolute requirement is that it I do one single edit pass for my colors for both print and web use, and I get what I see on the screen in PS on both the prints and on the web display (i.e., working in sRGB/Monitor RGB mode all the time won't cut it). And PREFERABLY, let me do all my editing work in the ProPhoto (or at least AdobeRGB) colorspace so I have a gamut closer to what the printer can do.
    Anyone got a decent solution for this?

    Sorry, I think I'm being unclear.  This has nothing to do with individual monitor profiles.  In Proof Setup, "Monitor RGB" amounts to turning off ALL color management, and simply letting the monitor do what it will.  It is what the vast majority of web browsers do (even if the operating system provides color management, the browsers don't take advantage of it), so that is what you need to consider for images that will be viewed on a web browser.  If you convert your image to sRGB,  select Monitor RGB in Proof Set up, and turn on Proof Colors, you will see the image as it would appear on a web browser (after you save it as a jpg or use "Save For Web/Devices" to save it as a jpg).   Since almost everyone is running different uncalibrated monitors, there will be lots of variation in how it will look to them, so precise control of the color is unimportant.
    That said, I would expect the color on a calibrated monitor (such as the one I use when editing) to be reasonably close to the colors I am seeing while editing in PS.  To the extent a monitor deviates from "calibrated", those colors will vary, but a good monitor should show good colors.   Unfortunately, this is NOT the case, as my previous post shows.  The colors produced by the steps above are oversaturated and significantly shifted in hue.  There is, to my mind, anyway, no reason for this.  Adobe clearly knows what the mapping is between the colors as it displays them in PS and the un-controlled "Monitor RGB" -- that is, it is the color map they are using during normal editing display.  If they were to reverse-apply that map prior to saving it as a jpg, then the image would appear on a browser on that same (presumably calibrated) monitor very similar to what you set up when editing.  Anyone else viewing the image on a web browser with a calibrated monitor would also see good colors.  To the extent other viewers' monitors are out of calibration, their colors will suck, but there's nothing you can do about that.
    I guess in some sense I AM "asking for a Color-Mamangement-solution for a "non-Color-Management-situation", but specifically I'm asking for PS Color Management to do the best it can for non-Color-Managed situations that we all face every day.
    Does that make more sense?

Maybe you are looking for