DFS-R Top level NTFS Permissions

Hi,
As part of my setup, I'm trying to implement a new DFS-R share between 2x Windows 2003 R2 and 1x 2008 R2 servers
I've been experimenting with the DFS-R, and I've found that if I try to change the NTFS partitions of the top-most folder, then these permissions are not replicated to the other duplicates on the other servers. Sub-file and sub-folder Perms are.
I've also found that if I do modify the top-level folder, than that server stops replicating to the others - with no errors in the event logs !  Disaster !!  In my testing, all I did was add another users read access, and then that stops replication!!
So - if I need to control the top-level perms, do they all have to be in sync and setup manually ?

Hi Shaon,
Sorry I had to actually setup the server on the remote site.  So no - I'm still seeing issues.
I ran that DFSutil on serv14. I don't know why it doesn't show the ClientApps DFS replication.
2 entries...
Entry: \Ubiq-serv1\Users
ShortEntry: \Ubiq-serv1\Users
Expires in 24 seconds
UseCount: 1 Type:0x81 ( REFERRAL_SVC DFS )
   0:[\UBIQ-SERV1\Users] AccessStatus: 0 ( ACTIVE TARGETSET )
Entry: \ubiquisys.local\sysvol
ShortEntry: \ubiquisys.local\sysvol
Expires in 562 seconds
UseCount: 0 Type:0x1 ( DFS )
   0:[\UBIQ-SERV14.ubiquisys.local\sysvol] AccessStatus: 0 ( ACTIVE TARGETSET )
   1:[\UBIQ-SERV1.ubiquisys.local\sysvol] ( TARGETSET )
   2:[\ubiq-serv9.ubiquisys.local\sysvol]
   3:[\ubiq-serv8.ubiquisys.local\sysvol]
   4:[\UBIQ-SERV10.ubiquisys.local\sysvol] ( TARGETSET )
DfsUtil command completed successfully.
I'm also seeing folders/files not replicate between 14 and 9.  Some do, some dont. Seems to be zero byte files causing most of the issues.

Similar Messages

  • Adding permissions at top level folder

    Let's say your top-level folder is d:\filestore\   You add Domain Admins to it with Full Control.
    If the sub-folders have maintained inheritance of the perms from that folder then you're good. 
    However, if any of the subfolders have broken permissions, either by removing all permission and adding new ones or by copying the permissions and adding additional ones, then you're kinda screwed. Enforcing inheritance of the perms from your top level folder on that mess will almost certainly obliterate the existing permissions.
    If you're semi-lucky you might be get away with finding a number of folders that you can apply the perms to that will then propagate to the rest.
    If you're really unlucky, and it sounds like you are, then you may have to apply the permissions to many individual folders. 

    I have just migrated to a new 2012 R2 server and have my AD and file server on separate VM's.  The previous server had the local Administrators group listed, but now I need to add the Domain Admins group to the top level of the folder tree and have that pass down throughout all other folders.  But I don't want it to overwrite the existing permissions.  Is there any way to do this?
    The folder structure is insane and I want to redo it a better way, but that will take time and the OK from management.  There are so many "individual" users added to many folders that it is currently impossible to keep track of.  
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

  • Did 10.6.5 alter the permissions of the top level of the startup volume?

    Since applying the 10.6.5 update it seems that non-admin users have read/write access to the top level directory of the startup volume. That means that non-admin users can create items there.
    I am wondeing if this is a normal change for 10.6.5 or if something is weird with my system.
    We updated from 10.6.4 via Software Update. This machine has only ever had Snow Leopard installed on it.
    (Note that top level sub-folders such as Library and System do not appear to be affected by this)

    Are you referring to the ownership and privileges for the drive? If so then if they aren't set at the default it's because of something a user has done because the installer makes no such changes. You can return them to the default as follows;
    1. Select the drive and Press COMMAND-I to open the Get Info window.
    2. In the Ownership and Sharing section at the bottom is a checkbox labeled, "Ignore permissions on this volume." If the box is checked then click on the lock icon and authenticate. Uncheck the box.
    3. Open the Terminal application in the Utilities folder and enter the following command then press RETURN:
    sudo chown root:admin "/Volumes/Macintosh HD"
    You will be asked to enter your admin password which will not be echoed.
    If you now click onto the still open Get Info window you should now see the proper info:
    Owner=system with r/w privileges
    Group=admin with r/w privileges
    Everyone is read-only
    Click on the lock icon to prevent any changes. Close the window then quit the Terminal.

  • Getting top level permissions?

    Hello.
    We have a bunch of folders on a fileserver that has folders shared directly to people instead of AD Groups. I want to get all top level permissions (IE the ones not inherited) and display the top level folder("the root folder") and the usernames
    which have access to it.
    With that information i will create Groups and share to the Group et cetera.
    Is this possible to do powershell? How would i go about doing it?
    Any tips welcome!

    You could try
    this module's Get-AccessControlEntry function. There is a screenshot on its download page that shows sample output. It also has a switch parameter to only show non-inherited ACEs. You could look at permissions at the root folder only, or you could show
    non-inherited ACEs for any folders under the root:
    Get-AccessControlEntry c:\root -NotInherited
    dir c:\root -recurse | Get-AccessControlEntry -NotInherited
    The results can be exported to a CSV, where each line will include, among other things, the path, the type of ACE (allow, deny), the principal, the access mask, and whether or not it is inherited.
    You can also use the Select-Object and/or Group-Object cmdlets on the results to further analyze the permissions.
    Let me know if you're interested in the module and have any questions about it.

  • Changing permissions on a top level public folder WITHOUT affecting the folders underneath it in Exchange 2007

    Hello everyone,
    We have a pubilc folder we woudl like to lockdown to just the IT techs, but we want eveything below to function as it normally has been.  We have several folders underneath this folder with various permissions for our end users that we dont want changed. 
    How would you change the permissions on a top level folder without affecting (propagating) the folders underneath it?  Also, If I go into the "Administration" tab of the properties of the top level Public Folder I see an option to
    make this folder available to: "All users with access permission" or "Owners only". Would it be as simple to select "Owners only" here or will that restrict the down level folders as well to just the owners?
    Thanks,
    John

    Hi,
    You use PFDAVAdmin to customize your permission level for mailbox and public folder. This is good tool which helped me a lot in most of the permission issue for PF and Mailbox. Follow the below article for more detail of PFDAVAdmin Tool
    http://www.nigelboulton.co.uk/2010/12/delegating-and-propagating-exchange-folder-permissions-using-pfdavadmin/
    Exchange Queries

  • Cannot Create Folder at Top Level of Documents Library

    Operating System:  Windows 7 Enterprise, 32-Bit
    Environment:  Windows 2003 domain
    Security:  Local Machine admin, and domain admin
    Documents Library is redirected via Group Policy to
    \\servername\home\username
    Navigating to Libraries\Documents, there is no "New Folder" button available at that top level of the library.  When using File menu => New => Folder, I get "Unable to create the folder 'New Folder'   File system error (512)."  
    Looked that one up using Google, er, I mean Bing, and found articles about it being an old DOS\Win95 issue with the 512 max limit on the root drive.  Am familiar with that problem, and this ain't it. Less than 30 folders at the root level, and none more
    than 20 characters long. 
    From inside an Application, if I try to save to my Library\Documents folder, I cannot save a file to the root level.  I get "To save here, you must first include a folder in the Library."
    At this point where I am looking to save a file, I also cannot type a folder name for navigation, as I am used to doing with previous OS's.  So in my address area, I have Libraries\Documents, then I have a subfolder called "important."  If I type
    the word "Important," expect the system fo navigate down into that folder.  Instead I get "To save here, you must first include a folder in the Library." If I type "Important\" I still get the same error.
    Navigating to \\servername\home\username, I am able to create a New Folder at the top level from a Windows Explorer window, or from inside an application such as Word. 
    Mapping a drive letter to \\servername\home\username also will allow me to create a New Folder at the top level, from a Windows Explorer Window, or from inside an application.
    From a command prompt, I am able to get to the drive letter and create a new folder. 
    With the drive letter mapped, going back to Libraries\Documents, I am still unable to create a new folder that way.  
    I read these two threads, both of which sort of die off with no real answers.  So I've started my own. 
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itpronetworking/thread/4ea2f28f-8487-40cf-abb0-745916e72b7a
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itprosecurity/thread/ae2505ce-8a6b-493b-9473-a0dca215fd34
    Any Help? 

    Hi,
    Regarding your problem, it seems that the user didn’t have appropriate permissions to create folders. To get it work, NTFS and Share permissions must be configured
    appropriately.
    Here are the Share and NTFS Permissions needed on the File Server Shares and the steps to do so:
    NOTE: The $ symbol should be used to hide the existence of the share.
    User Home Share Configuration:
    Here are the Share and NTFS Permissions needed for Home Directories:
    a. The Share permissions (Sharing Tab): Share Named: <HOME>$
    Administrators: Full Control
    System: Full Control
    Authenticated Users: Full Control
    b. NTFS Folder Permissions (Security Tab): Turn off inheritance on the Folder named <HOME>, and copy the permissions. (Uncheck "Allow inheritable permissions
    to
    propagate to this object")
    Administrators: Full Control
    System: Full Control
    Creator Owner: Full Control
    Authenticated Users: Read & Execute, List Folder Contents, Read
    c. On the NTFS Folder Permissions Click the Advanced Button. Then highlight Authenticated Users, Select View/Edit
    d. On the Permissions Entry for <HOME>, "the Apply onto" change to: "This folder
    only"
    e. Click OK
    f. Click OK again.
    More reference, please read the following document:
    Windows Server 2008 Share/NTFS permissions on home
    directories/folders
    Redirect the Documents folder to a network share
    Please note: we provide the third party link for technical use
    only. There may be some changes without notice, Microsoft doesn’t guarantee any accuracy on contacting information.
    BTW, as this issue is relevant to Windows Server 2003, please post in
    Windows Server forums for solution as well.
    Hope it helps.
    Best Regards
    Dale
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

  • Non Active Directory users are not able to access sharepoint top level site

    I have created a sharepoint group with read permission on top level site and I added the NON AD users to that group but the non ad users are unable to access top level site ,they are able to access remaining all subsites without any issue.I am facing
    this issue only with NON AD users....I have checked the page layouts , all the layouts are  in published mode.All the webparts and Lists on Default.aspx page has all users access permissions.Do I need to change anything in central administration
    for this webapplication.

    Hi,
    Could you please reproduce the issue and collect error information in ULS log for troubleshooting?
    For your convenience:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/opal/archive/2009/12/22/uls-viewer-for-sharepoint-2010-troubleshooting.aspx
    Regards,
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • NTFS permissions - Only access to folders created by the user himself

    Hi,
    I once came by an TechNet article explaining how to set up the NTFS permission on a shared folder, so the users would have rights to create a subfolder, and then only have access to this folder, and none of the co-existing folders on the same level, created
    by similiar users.
    So in details, I have shared a folder called backup$, where the users needs access to create their own subfolder (will be done automatically by a script). And in case they would need to browse their way to the full path, I need to make sure, they won't be
    able to access folders created by other users.
    Any help is much appreciated.
    Martin Bengtsson | www.imab.dk

    Hi,
    I am not clear what are the rights you will set through the script for each sub-folder. You can verify, your settings using
    Effective Permission tool.
    You can more about Effective Permissions from the below URLs.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772184.aspx
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2006.01.howitworksntfs.aspx
    <hr/>
    <br/>
    Regards,<br/>
    Jack<br/>
    <a href=http://www.jijitechnologies.com>JiJi Technologies</a>
    I'm sorry if my question is not clear. I'm looking for the correct NTFS permissions to set on the shared folder. No permissions are being set in the script.
    Martin Bengtsson | www.imab.dk

  • How do we fetch the top-level users and groups for a particular resource

    Hi Experts,
    I need to fetch the top level users and groups (permissions) for a particular resource, Currently i am able to fetch the effective users list.
    Thanks.

    To elaborate...
    Here we need the users and groups who have direct access to the resource. We dont want to resolve groups.
    Please help us with the apis to use in our java code to fetch the users and groups.

  • Reading NTFS permissions and changing them with PowerShell

    Hi,
    I have a large folder structure which contains the shares for several sites.  I've been asked to change the permissions for a group on each of these folders from 'full control' to 'read and execute' on the top level only.  My problem is that the
    name of the group to change is different on each folder.  They follow the same naming convention however which I've attempted to show in the example below.
    Folder1 has a group named FOL1-AdminUsers which has full control, there are several other administrative AD groups with permissions to the folder which must remain the same.  Similarly there is a Folder2 which has a group named FOL2-AdminUsers
    which needs to be changed and so on.
    The part of the script I'm having trouble with is reading the existing permissions from a specific folder and searching for the group I need to change.  Everything else has been fairly straight forward but I've just become completely stuck
    on this.  I'd really appreciate any help anybody could give me or if you could point me in the right direction for further assistance.     
    Many thanks,
    Gary.

    Hi Gary,
    you can read access permissions from a folder by using the Get-Acl cmdlet (Get-Acl "C:\ExampleFolder"). This will return an
    DirectorySecurity object. This comes with an Access CodeProperty that will return all permissions on the folder:
    $Acl = Get-Acl "C:\ExampleFolder"
    $Acl.Access
    It has many useful methods as well, so check out its members:
    $Acl | Get-Member
    Finally, there are useful tools for manipulating Acls, notably the official Set-Acl cmdlet or Rohn's AccessControl Module (Thanks Rohn, it's awesome) in the Gallery.
    If the module is a bit complex for you, there are some simple functions - shameless advertisement incoming - you could instead use: New-AccessRule and
    Add-AccessRule.
    Cheers,
    Fred
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    Thanks for the compliment!
    Gary, Rhys and Fred already mentioned that the info you're looking for is in the Access property when you use the built-in Get-Acl cmdlet. You could also use the Get-AccessControlEntry function from
    the module Fred mentioned:
    # List all ACEs for a single folder
    Get-AccessControlEntry C:\Folder
    # List all ACEs for specific principals (this example searches for two):
    Get-AccessControlEntry C:\Folder -Principal FOL*AdminUsers, AnotherUserNameHere
    # List ACEs for all subfolders (uses PSv3 syntax):
    dir C:\Folder -Directory -Recurse | Get-AccessControlEntry

  • Unable to find top level site associated with project site

    Hello!
    SP and PS 2013. I faced the problem with one project and its site synchronization.
    When user published this project at 1st time, the site wasn’t created (there were some errors), but user didn’t notice that. So, after few days when he couldn’t open
    the site, he ask me for help.
    I did my usual operations in such cases – I open “Connected sites” and create the site myself.
    Earlier there was not any problem with that. But now this project experiences some troubles with permissions sync for
    it’s site – there is no synchronization.
    I connected this problem with November CU, which has been installed couple of weeks ago.
    I have read about the same problems after upgrade, so I want to emphasize that site was created on the root site collection (Project Web App) and it is not a subsite
    of another project site.
    If there is no solution until next update, maybe there is some way to turn off permission synchronization only for this site?
    Any help will be appriciated!!!
    Kate
    Queue error:
    GeneralQueueJobFailed
    (26000) - PreparePSProjectPermissionSynchronization.PreparePSProjectPermissionSynchronizationMessage.
    Подробные
    сведения: id='26000' name='GeneralQueueJobFailed'
    uid='231b2c2c-fc8b-e411-942d-0050569d3fac' JobUID='79031b2c-fc8b-e411-942d-0050569d3fac' ComputerName='7d8a1473-f6a8-4a8e-b7fb-1bdd868c7e20' GroupType='PreparePSProjectPermissionSynchronization' MessageType='PreparePSProjectPermissionSynchronizationMessage'
    MessageId='1' Stage='' CorrelationUID='a923d99c-8e88-c0e8-c7e2-08a980da8c96'.
    Для получения дополнительных сведений проверьте журналы ULS на компьютере
    7d8a1473-f6a8-4a8e-b7fb-1bdd868c7e20 для записей с JobUID
    79031b2c-fc8b-e411-942d-0050569d3fac
    In logs:
    12/25/2014 12:42:45.85        Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x07E4)        0x5E10           
    Project Server                            Sharepoint Integration           
    amed3 Exception        Unable to find top level site associated with project site Site1 System.IO.FileNotFoundException: <nativehr>0x80070002</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>Нет
    веб-сайта
    с
    именем "/Site1".     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.OpenWebInternal(String
    bstrUrl, Guid& pguidID, DateTime& pdtTimeCreated, String& pbstrRequestAccessEmail, UInt32& pwebVersion, String& pbstrServerRelativeUrl, UInt32& pnLanguage, UInt32& pnLocale, String& pbstrDefaultTheme, String& pbstrDefaultThemeCSSUrl,
    String& pbstrThemedCssFolderUrl, String& pbstrAlternateCSSUrl, String& pbstrCustomizedCssFileList, String& pbstrCustomJSUrl, String& pbstrAlternateHeaderUrl, String& pbstrMasterUrl, String& pbstrCustomMasterUrl, String& pbstrSiteLogoUrl,
    String& pbstrSi...   2a29d99c-9ecc-c0e8-c7e2-037970debfdf

    Hi Kate_S,
    since you are already aware that its a known issue caused Sep 2014 CU i believe, and an official fix has yet to release.
    but i would like to clarify here that this issue doesn't have anything to do with project site creation, because sync queue job while creating project site fails but does not block other queues activities. so your project site should be created in a normal
    way.
    and until official fix will arrive, 1 of the option is to change your project sites to provision under root site collection instead of PWA site collection. But be aware that this will fix sync issue only for new project sites.
    Go to Central Administratio -> PWA settings -> open site provision settings menu and made changes.
    2nd option is, since Project Owner always get access to Project site, to teach your project owners to include project team members manually to project site permission group to allow them to have access. this option can help you with both new and existing
    project sites, and i personally prefer this and did the same for my affected customers.
    Hope these 2 options will help you. 
    Khurram Jamshed - MBA, PMP, MCTS, MCITP (
    Blog, Twitter, Linkedin )
    If you found this post helpful, please “Vote as Helpful”. If it answered your question, please “Mark as Answer”.

  • Numbered folders appearing on top level of HD

    Past few days these folders keep reappearing. They are completely empty, I dump them, and then they show up again. I've been looking through the forums and haven't found any reference. Did the basic troubleshooting/permissions routines and ran Onyx. No dice they keep coming back. Any ideas on what they are or if they are signs of a problem?
    the folders look like this:
    9ffffff8200
    and contain folders like this:
    -05fffffff8ffffff-0000000000
    -05fffffff8ffffff-0000000004
    -05fffffff8ffffff-59e5700100
    -05fffffff8ffffff-0014043c0a
    -05fffffff8ffffff-028802cccc
    etc....

    I HOPE THIS HELPS people to see what I'm getting on the top level only:  Here are 2 images -- a before and after:  I have a very plain empty folder called "Test Folder 1 May 2015" in the first one (along with some other folders) and then in the second one you can see I duplicated that folder -- but it now has a progress bar and and "x" showing!  (Just the "duplicated" file - the one with copy in the name).  This is a screen shot (using "Totalfinder" if anyone is wondering).  Same with my daughter's new MacBook (and she has essentially nothing on it, is not using TotalFinder - but the same problem.  Hey, maybe it's not a problem, maybe it's a "feature" of Yosemite or just the way it treats root level folders now--- but I sure would like to get rid of this weirdness if possible without breaking the system!

  • Robocopy not copying NTFS permissions

    Hi All, got a 2008 64bit server, copying a 100 GB folder from one disk to another on the same server. And randomly robocopy does not apply NTFS permissions to folders at root level. It leaves them to default.
    This is the command I am using:
    robocopy "F:\Project1" "H:\Project1" /E /Copy:DATSOU /IS /IT /log:c:\Project.txt /TEE
    What could be the issue ?

    Hello,
    If we want to robocopy the whole d:\project1 and all the subfolders to H:\project1 while preserving its NTFS security permission, we can use following command syntax with robocopy.
    Example:
    =============
     Robocopy "F:\Project1" "H:\Project1" /E /SEC
    /e: Copies subdirectories includes any empty directories.
    /sec: Copies files with security.
    For more reference, please refer to:
    Robocopy
    http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/d4c6e8e9-fcb3-4a4a-9d04-2d8c367b63541033.mspx?mfr=true
    Hope this information will be helpful.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse sublevels)?

    Howdy!
    I'll bet I'm not the only one wishing for this.  Let's say you're using Captivate 4's Table of Contents feature with a longish movie of Cp slides, which is chunked into bite-size sections content-wise.  In the ToC, though, you can't mimic that same organization scheme; at least, the learner would first need to collapse all the ToC folders you've created so they see only the top-level listing.
    This can be a critical issue:  keeping the at-first-glance list in the ToC brief enough to be inviting to learners, yet allowing learners to drive which details are currently visible.
    A movie's topical hierarchy could be along these lines, for example ...
    Section 1 - National Brands
    What are National Brands?
    Why Are They Important to Our Business?
    Working with Nat. Brands
    Practice Your Knowledge
    Section 2 - International Brands
    What are International Brands?
    Why Are They Important to Our Business?
    Working with Intl. Brands
    Practice Your Knowledge
    You'd like to organize the ToC to show only the section titles (1st level) and to suppress the 2nd-level detail (slide titles) until the learner chooses to expand the folder to see those details.
    I've tried things like grouping the slides into sections in the Storyboard view and organizing the slides into sections strictly within the ToC -- both to no avail.
    Has anyone solved for this need yet?
    I'm all ears, and you'd be doing learners of the world a huge favor.
    Thanks!

    Hi, Jim.
    Thanks for being 'on the case' and looking into this so quickly.  Your
    findings are encouraging, although my user base is generally working with
    IE 6 and FP8 or 9.
    Since the only thing I may influence is getting  IT to help push out FP10,
    I'm hoping it's more of a player- than a browser-version issue.
    I'll test things out by Monday and let you know the results.  Wish me luck!
    Dave
                                                                                    From:       Jim Leichliter <[email protected]>                                                                               
    To:         Dave Tressler <[email protected]>                                                                               
    Date:       03/26/2010 06:02 PM                                                                               
    Subject:    Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse
                  sublevels)?                                                                                
    Dave,
    I just tested this on my local web server and it worked fine.  I created a
    blank project with 8 slides.  Created my TOC with grouping... 2 slides in
    each group.  I turned on self paced learning.  I tried with and without the
    widget and it picked up where I left off in either case.  See
    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B86WuEq6SVwRNWIwMjhjODctMjE2Yy00MWE2LWI5YzEtMGQxYzNjOWQ0Z mI2&hl=en. 
    I published using FP10 and IE8 to view.  Notice any difference between
    your project and this one?
    Thanks,
    Jim Leichliter

  • Inactive component cost not rolled up to top level item

    Hi
    Our scenario is as follows: we have a top level item with a BOM. And some components of the BOM  are having material status u2018inactiveu2019. Inactive means materials will not procured and sold, however we could have inventory which can be consumed in production of other materials. In other words inactive items are like old items. These inactive items already have costing value. And we donu2019t want to recost inactive items.
    Having described above scenario, the requirement here is when we run costing for top level item, system should take costing value of inactive items  and roll up into top level item costing which is NOT happening now. Client donu2019t want to recost inactive items. The reason for not recosting inactive items is the recosting could change cost of inactive items significantly.  We are using 4.7 version and standard costing.
    Would appreciate any ideas or suggestions in this regard.
    thanx
    Sunil

    Thanks Young for the reply. 
    We already set 'do not cost' indicator for inactive components. And these inactive components do have standard costs valid up 10 12/31/2999.  It seems bom explosion is excluding these materials. it is ok to exclude. However the existing standard cost of these inactive components did not roll up in to top level. when I checked the costing status log, it says material ABCDF123 in plant 3344 has material status 40: Inactive.
    I checked BOM as well and inactive component is flagged as 'relevant for costing'.
    We are using following valuation varaiant
        Strategy Sequence ->  1. Planned Price 1    2.Standard Cost
        Transfer Control - Complete Transfer
    thnx

Maybe you are looking for