Diff between assessement and distribution

hi
sap gurus
can any bady clearly tell me about the difference between ASSESSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION?
THANK YOU
VENKATAREDDY

hai venkt:-
Assement is can be used in both elements, means primary cost elements and secondary cost elements.assessment is a allocate the cost element from sender cost center to reciver cost center.under the assessment cost element, Here we are not trace out orignal cost element. and also no of recivers is restricted for the customization,reciver may be as acost center, IO(internal order,)WBS and settle order.line item can be posted as a sender as well as reciver.
Distribution:-
Distribution can be used in only primary cost elements, here we are trace out the orginal cost element. means from sender to reciver cost center. reciver may be as acost center, IO(internal order,)WBS and settle order.line item can be posted as a sender as well as reciver.
may be it useful
assinge the points

Similar Messages

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ASSESSMENT AND DISTRIBUTION

Dear Friends,
What is the main difference between Assesment and Distribution?
Thanks in advances.

Hello,
Please follow the forum rules
1. No capital letters
2. Search before posting
DISTRIBUTION =========== Distribution was created for transfer primary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During distribution, only cost centers or business process can be used as sender. A distribution receiver can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing. Primary Postings (such as, energy costs) are collected on a cost center, and allocated at the end of the period by means of the user-defined key. You can only distribute primary costs. During this process, the original cost element remains the same. Line items are posted for the sender as well as for the receiver, enabling the allocation to be recorded exactly. You can reverse distributions as often as required. You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships. PERIODIC REPOSTING ================= Differences between periodic reposting and distribution are due to information content and performance. For periodic reposting, no separate credit record is written on the sender for the cost element in the summary report. Instead, the totals record for the cost element is reduced on the debit side, which means that the original debit amount can no longer be checked there (u201Cunclean creditu201D). However, during distribution, the system writes a totals record for the credit (u201Cclean creditu201D). The information on the receiver is the same for periodic reposting and distribution (u201Cclean debitu201D). Compared with periodic reposting, during distribution, the system also updates the partner in the totals record for the sender. This means that the partner can be displayed in the information system on the totals record level. As fewer totals records are written during periodic reposting, performance is better than during distribution. ASSESSMENT =========== Assessment was created to transfer primary and secondary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During assessment, cost center or business processes can be used as senders. The receivers for an assessment can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing. Primary and secondary posting are allocated at the end of the period by the user-defined key. During assessment, the original cost elements are summarized into assessment cost elements (secondary cost element category = 42). As the system writes fewer total records, the assessment has a better performance than periodic reposting and distribution. The system does not display the original cost elements in the receivers. Therefore, assessment is useful if the cost drilldown for the receiver is not important. Similar to distribution, the partner is updated in the totals record during distribution You can reverse assessments as often as required. You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships. Regards, Ravi

PackageMaker 3.0.3: diff between metapackage and distribution package?

Hello,
I'm trying to build an installer that does the following:
1) install an application in /Applications
2) modify the installed application (adding custom plugins)
3) install extra files somewhere else
I've built 3 packages for these items each with their own preflight and postflight scripts (when relevant). Each can be selected by the user to be installed or not. (3) can be installed in a different place than preset.
I've found info in the PackageMaker User Guide that there are metapackages and distribution packages and they differ in the order of the scripts being executed and the possibility of installing some or all packages in custom locations.
But I can't find how to configure a package to be either a metapackage or a distribution package in the PackageMaker interface.
Any clues?
Thanks.

I wouldn't recommend that. You should really play by PackageMaker's rules. Of course, those rules aren't written down anywhere
What you can do is set your destination to be just / - nothing else. Then, the files that you install need to have their own, correct, hierarchy. You start with a temp folder. In that temp folder and create the following hierarchcy (for example): /tmp/packagemaker/Library/QuickTime/Perian. Then, you build your package using /tmp/packagemaker. I have scripts that build my temp directories just so before I ever start PackageMaker. Next, apply the appropriate (usually root) permissions to your temp files. (This way, you can keep non-root files in your own SCM repository). Finally, build the package using those temp files. Depending on how you structure your hierarchy, you may need to check/uncheck "Include root in package".
I've made it sound easier than it is. There is some trial an error involved.
Let me know if this doesn't make sense. I know it is confusing.

Diff between periodic and distribution cycle

Dear All,
What is the difference between Periodic reposting and distribution cycle. Where all i have to use periodic reposting and where all i have to use distribution cycle.
Regards
Vasantha

> Dear All,
> What is the difference between Periodic
> reposting and distribution cycle. Where all i have
> to use periodic reposting and where all i have to
> use distribution cycle.
<b>Period reporting:
U want to make correction posting in Co module u will use periodic posting. For example in a document u have wrongly entered Cost center and u want to make correction u will use periodic posting.
Distribution is totally different from periodic reposting: Here u move values from one cost center to one or more cost center by cycles.Say from service cost center to production cost center.</b>
> Regards
> Vasantha

Types of DTP , Diff between Standard and Error DTP

Hi experts,
What is DTP , are the Types of DTP , Diff between Standard and Error DTP , how it works in BI 7.0.
I will assign points for your valuable answers.

Hello ,
Data transfer process (DTP) to transfer data within BI from one persistent object to another object, in accordance with certain transformations and filters. In this respect, it replaces the data mart interface and the InfoPackage. As of SAP NetWeaver 7.0, the InfoPackage only loads data to the entry layer of BI (PSA).
The data transfer process makes the transfer processes in the data warehousing layer more transparent. Optimized parallel processing improves the performance of the transfer process (the data transfer process determines the processing mode). You can use the data transfer process to separate delta processes for different targets and you can use filter options between the persistent objects on various levels. For example, you can use filters between a DataStore object and an InfoCube.
Data transfer processes are used for standard data transfer, for real-time data acquisition, and for accessing data directly.
1.Benefit: Data Distributionwithin BI Capabilities (from PSA or InfoProviders to InfoProviders)
2.Improved transparency of staging processes across data warehouselayers (PSA, DWH layer, ODS layer, Architected Data Marts)
3.Improved performance and high scalability
4.Separation of delta mechanism for different data targets: delta capability is controlledby the DTP
5.Enhanced filtering in dataflow
6.Repair modus based on temporary buffers (buffers keep complete set of data)
See these docs for more info
[Data Transfer Process |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/f98e07cc483255e10000000a1553f7/content.htm]
[Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW)|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/67efb9bb-0601-0010-f7a2-b582e94bcf8a]
[What's New with SAP NetWeaver 2004s - Detailed|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/910aa7a7-0b01-0010-97a5-f28be23697d3]
[SAP NetWeaver 7.0 ETL and EII|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0b24053-654e-2a10-4180-b0e7c7b4c9f2]
[How to Create Monitor Entries from a Transformation Routine (NW7.0)|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50fda171-e36e-2910-9290-e3dab26c50b5]
FAQ on SAP NetWeaver 2004s
[Modeling the Enterprise Data Warehousing for SAP NetWeaver 2004s FAQ|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7c2a7c65-0901-0010-5e8c-be0ad9c05a31]
[Enterprise Data Warehousing for SAP NetWeaver 2004s FAQ|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c9f5fb91-0c01-0010-67a8-fd35946e9403]
Thanks
Chandran

Difference between Assessments and distribution

Hi co experts,
As per our knowledge the Difference between Assessments and distribution is distribution allocates primary cost elements and an assessment allocates both primary and secondary coat elements.
My doubt is, Apart from the above sentence is there any other difference between assessments and distribution.
Regards
venkataswamy

Hi,
I just want to make one correction from Dublin statement for cost element category. Actually the concept he explained is correct.
@ Distribution: The data use are for primary cost element only, and the cost are record on receiver side using original
                        cost element.
@ Assessment: We can use either Primary cost Element or Secondary cost Element. The cost recorded on receiver side is
                        using Assessment Cost Element (Cost element category 42) not the cat 43, the cat 43 is for cost allocation.
Hope this help you.
Regards,
Iie

Diff between Serialization and Synchronization

Hi I am new to java.
Pl. give me the difference between Serialization and Synchronization.
Thankq
Sridhar

Don't you look at the timestamps of posts? They could
have been typing at the same time.
/KajPlease stop! I'll die laughing. LOL
Re: Diff between Serialization and Synchronization
Author: Annie. Apr 11, 2005 10:30 AM (reply 1 of 4)
Re: Diff between Serialization and Synchronization
Author: glrao Apr 12, 2005 8:31 AM (reply 2 of 4) I really like your sense of humor.
xH4x0r

Diff between dbms_profiler and dbms_trace

Hi,
what would be the major diff between dbms_profiler and dbms_trace? which is more useful.
Thanks,
Mathew

DBMS_PROFILER is one way to analyse where the time is being spent

Whats the diff between express and pro??

Just wondering what the main diff between the two are. I've used pro at school, but cant afford to get it at home. Will i still be able to use the same audio instruments like the same synths and plug ins??? Also, would i be able to run the program on a mac mini (top of the line)?

Matt Mac 63, "Whats the diff between express and pro??" #5, 10:33pm Oct 18, 2005 CDT
All I was saying is that if a person can afford to get Pro, they definitely should. The difference in features adds up to at least the difference in price, if not very much more.
Having said that, Express is good value compared to most other DAW software at that pricepoint, but it is only intended as a 'Lite' version.
Some examples, off the top of my head, of differences not made really clear in the comparison list.
Input Objects:
In Pro you can use Input Objects to monitor incoming signal without rec-enabling a track. That doesn't sound much, on the face of it, but what it means is you can use external FX units (hardware) as inserts in tracks (or busses) just like plugins, and bounce them with the mix. it also means you acn monitor what you are playing into Logic Pro with plugin FX applied, but record dry so you can hear your guitar with the reverb, or whatever, but still have the recorded dry signal so you can change the FX settings later.
Pro has some very handy environment objects. The main one being the Trabsformer object. But also another extremely useful object is TouchTracks.
If you've ever played with Ableton Live you would have noticed you can triger clips with the keyboard in all different ways (loop, gate loop, one shot etc.) Well TouchTracks does that with MIDI regions.(I have a feeling that feature in Live was modeled after Logic's TouchTracks' as it is incredibly similar.)
They are only a few examples of a whole range of differences. If all the differences were itemized in the 'comparison chart' it would be about 3 pages long.
All I am saying is, don't take the comparison chart as the definitive list of differences.
yes, Express is a good basic tool and you can do a lot with it, with some imagination.
The SOS author's claim that:
you're paying less than a third of the price of Logic Pro and getting over 90 percent of the functionality."
is not true in totality.
It may be true to someone who has never dabbled in audio software before, because it takes literally years to become fully conversant with every function in Logic Pro, and no-one uses absolutely everything.
But for serious users, who have big demands, in my opinion, Express is less than 30% of Pro's functionality.

Diff between issession and issystem

All,
Wanted to understand ..When we need to restart he DB servers in case if we change some parameters ...?
What is the diff between issession and issystem modifiable clauses ...?
Thanks

Got the answer

Diff Between PCC and PC by Order

Dear Team,
Why PCC does not support Actual Cost Method and Why PC by Order does't not support Target Cost Method?
Please give your views and comments.
Best Regards,
Satish

hi
=========================
what is diff between billing and invoice?
From the help for cash order, it says that the invoice will print immediately after order created, the billing will be done seperately by transaction after delivery. Can anyone explain more detail.
=================
based on ur query.. Billing and Invoice are one and the same.. the difference is that in general business terminology Billing means the process of crediting the customer to the certain sum of money either by cash or credit, for the goods or services purchased by him... this process consists of many other documents like credit note, debit note, invoice, etc.
Invoice is the Printed format of the Bill ie, the sum of amount the customer is credited is made available in the printiable format....
dont get confused by the Billing and Invoice words.. in simple way invoice is one of the documents generated during the billing process.. Billing is a process which consists of various different documents which are generated depending on the business requirements...
Reward if USeful
Thanx & regards.
Naren..

Diff Between Interfaces and API

Hi to all.
Can anybody tell me , What is the basic diff between API and Interfaces ?
Thanks in advance

Hi Lalit,
Both place validation will happen. In Interface table as well as in API.
The difference you can say..for interface you have to load the data in and invoke the import program by which it will populate data in oracle apps base table. So you have to write some DML.
While in API you can simply use PLSQL record type and using that invoke API by which it will populate record in oracle apps base table.
Keep in mind both ways the validation happens. It is just the approach and some part is just for legacy data conversion.
Regards
Prashant Pathak

Diff between ides and original package

can any one tell me what are main diff between ides and original package
thanks
with regards,
phani

HI.,
IDES saytem is like a play ground in which we do all the transcations,But in Real time systme we dont have as many reference clients as IDES systme have,We have one reference client 0001 In real time systme as their land scape is laid as development,Testing & Production systems
Important thing is all the screens & T.codes are sames in both
REWARD if helpfull
Thanks & Regards
Narayana

Diff between cusztmizing and workbench request

could u please let me know what is diff between workbench and custmizing req ?
Regards

Hello,
customizing req vs workbench request
Check this info.
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
Hope this resolves your query.
Reward all the helpful answers.
Regards,
Jorge Diogo

Diff. between currency and unit fields

Hi All,
What is the diff. between 0DOC_CURRCY and 0CURRENCY, OUNIT and 0BASE_UOM? In which scenarios do we use each of them?
I have a flat file which contains some values for sales and quantity but does not have any units. So I have to upload them using constant currency and unit. now, I have to create my own keyfigures for the sales and quantity. What currency and unit fields should I use i.e 0CURRENCY or 0DOC_CURRCY and OUNIT or 0BASE_UOM?
Thanks a lot,
James.

hi James,
0doc_currency, 0currency share the same master data->0currency, 0unit, 0base_uom share the same master data->0unit, the 'basic' infoobject is 0currency and 0unit, all currency and unit will have reference to these infoobjects.
currency is used for keyfigures amount, with currency e.g usd, gbp, etc.
unit for keyfigures quantity, with unit like KG, CM etc.
currency tables are TCUR* and unit table T006*
you can use any of these infoobject currency or unit in your keyfigure (RSD2) or fix value like USD etc, normaly 0doc_currcy used for document currency; 0loc_currcy for local currency, you can create your own infoobject currency/unit with RSD3.
hope this helps.

Diff between assessement and distribution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for