Diff between RSA7 and qRFC MOnitor

Hi all,
What is the relationship between RSA7 and the qRFC monitor (Transaction SMQ1)?
regards,
jimmy

Hi jimmy,
The qRFC monitor basically displays the same data as RSA7. The internal queue name must be used for selection on the initial screen of the qRFC monitor. This is made up of the prefix 'BW, the client and the short name of the DataSource. For DataSources whose name are 19 characters long or shorter, the short name corresponds to the name of the DataSource. For DataSources whose name is longer than 19 characters (for delta-capable DataSources only possible as of PlugIn 2001.1) the short name is assigned in table ROOSSHORTN.
In the qRFC monitor you cannot distinguish between repeatable and new LUWs. Moreover, the data of a LUW is displayed in an unstructured manner there.
Regards,
Anish

Similar Messages

  • RSA7 and qRFC

    Hi All,
    What is the relationship between RSA7 and the qRFC monitor (Transaction SMQ1,SMQ2)?  Any one explain in detail?
    Regards,
    Krishna.

    Hi dear !
    Look at OSS Note 380078 'FAQ BW delta queue (RSA7) Questions and answers':
    "Question 12:
    What is the relationship between RSA7 and the qRFC monitor (Transaction SMQ1)?
    Answer:
    The qRFC monitor basically displays the same data as RSA7. The internal queue name must be used for selection on the initial screen of the qRFC monitor. This is made up of the prefix 'BW, the client and the short name of the DataSource. For DataSources whose name is shorter than 20 characters, the short name corresponds to the name of the DataSource.
    For DataSources whose name is longer than 19 characters (for delta-capable DataSources only possible as of PlugIn 2001.1) the short name is assigned in Table ROOSSHORTN.
    In the qRFC monitor you cannot distinguish between repeatable and new LUWs. Moreover, the data of a LUW is displayed in an unstructured manner there."
    Hope it helps!
    Bye,
    Roberto
    ...please don't forget to reward the answers...it's THE way to say thanks here !

  • Types of  DTP , Diff between Standard and Error DTP

    Hi experts,
    What is DTP ,  are the Types of  DTP , Diff between Standard and Error DTP , how it works in BI 7.0.
    I will assign points for your valuable answers.

    Hello ,
    Data transfer process (DTP) to transfer data within BI from one persistent object to another object, in accordance with certain transformations and filters. In this respect, it replaces the data mart interface and the InfoPackage. As of SAP NetWeaver 7.0, the InfoPackage only loads data to the entry layer of BI (PSA).
    The data transfer process makes the transfer processes in the data warehousing layer more transparent. Optimized parallel processing improves the performance of the transfer process (the data transfer process determines the processing mode). You can use the data transfer process to separate delta processes for different targets and you can use filter options between the persistent objects on various levels. For example, you can use filters between a DataStore object and an InfoCube.
    Data transfer processes are used for standard data transfer, for real-time data acquisition, and for accessing data directly.
    1.Benefit: Data ‘Distribution’within BI Capabilities (from PSA or InfoProviders to InfoProviders)
    2.Improved transparency of staging processes across data warehouselayers (PSA, DWH layer, ODS layer, Architected Data Marts)
    3.Improved performance and high scalability
    4.Separation of delta mechanism for different data targets: delta capability is controlledby the DTP
    5.Enhanced filtering in dataflow
    6.Repair modus based on temporary buffers (buffers keep complete set of data)
    See these docs for more info
    [Data Transfer Process |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/f98e07cc483255e10000000a1553f7/content.htm]
    [Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW)|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/67efb9bb-0601-0010-f7a2-b582e94bcf8a]
    [What's New with SAP NetWeaver 2004s - Detailed|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/910aa7a7-0b01-0010-97a5-f28be23697d3]
    [SAP NetWeaver 7.0 ETL and EII|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0b24053-654e-2a10-4180-b0e7c7b4c9f2]
    [How to Create Monitor Entries from a Transformation Routine (NW7.0)|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50fda171-e36e-2910-9290-e3dab26c50b5]
    FAQ on SAP NetWeaver 2004s
    [Modeling the Enterprise Data Warehousing for SAP NetWeaver 2004s FAQ|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7c2a7c65-0901-0010-5e8c-be0ad9c05a31]
    [Enterprise Data Warehousing for SAP NetWeaver 2004s FAQ|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c9f5fb91-0c01-0010-67a8-fd35946e9403]
    Thanks
    Chandran

  • Difference between TRFC and QRFC

    Dear all,
    i understand that TRFC functions as EO and QRFC functions as EOIO.
    but can anyone of u pls make me understand there significance with a practical example :
    1. in terms of XI
    2. without XI when we say that one R3 is connected to other with say TRFC or QRFC
    pl help

    Hi! Tarang,
    I just adding few points in this forum...Actually your question and some of the answers given are different .Some of them are deviating the topic.
    According to my knowledge and as per SAP documentations also I am adding these points. Correct me if I am wrong.
    At first QRFC , TRFC are different from the BE, EO and EOIO because trfc are message protocols and BE , EO and EOIO are nothing but Quality of Services (QOS).
    You can check this in the below URL::
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    QOS is one of the property of TRFC's.
    1) See Got o SMQ1 an SMQ2 what you will found:: ?
    QRFC Monitor Outbound Queue and QRFC Monitor Inbound Queue. both Queues QRFC s common.ok its a simple thing.
    2) Also lets take IDOC Adapter for IDOC whether it may be File to IDOC or IDOC to File Scenario where you will monitor the IDOC in SM58 also right ? why because this TRFC's are mainly for communicating with one SAP system to another SAP System. IDOC is mainly sending data via TRFC ports. That is why you ill monitor the IDOC if data doesn't reached means in Transaction COde:: SM58.
    3) QRFC Outbound and QRFC Inbound is mainly for communicating with SAP System and Non SAP Systems. Okay you can get this information in the below further explination and link.
    Note::qRFC communication is an extended form of tRFC communication. It adds a serialization concept to the transactional concept of tRFC.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/3b/befa40badbf46fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    Some applications use qRFC with outbound queue to improve system performance and not for serialization. If this is the case, you can switch automatically from the qRFC LUW with outbound queue to the tRFC LUW to avoid a hanging queue if a SYSTEM_FAILURE occurs
    Note:: To cancel a background job if tRFC errors occur use program RSARFCEX to restart tRFC.
    First What is the purpose of RFC:: ?All types of applications are instructed to communicate with other applications. This communication may take place within an SAP system, with another SAP system, or with an application from a remote external system. An interface that can be used for dealing with this task is the Remote Function Call (RFC).  RFCs can be used to start applications in remote systems, and to execute particular functions.
    There are 3 types of communications::
    Communication within an SAP system or with a remote system can take place using Remote Function Call (RFC). This enables the following scenarios:
    ·      a)  Communication between two independent SAP systems
           b)  Communication between a calling SAP system and an external receiving system
           c)  Communication between a calling external SAP system and an SAP system as the receiving
                system
    Features of the Three Communication TypesTo help you decide which communication types you need to implement according to your system landscape and your requirements, the advantages of the three types of communication are explained below:
    ... 1)      tRFC
    Suitable only for independent function module calls; the sequence of the calls is not preserved
    ·   2)   qRFC with outbound queue
    Function modules in a queue are guaranteed to be processed only once and in sequence (serialization). Also suitable for communication with non-SAP servers.
    ·   3)     qRFC with inbound queue
    The function modules created in the outbound queue are transferred from the outbound queue to the inbound queue; the sequence of the function modules is preserved. An inbound scheduler processes the inbound queues in accordance with the specified resources. Both the client and the server system must be SAP systems. One work process is used for each inbound queue.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/3b/befa40badbf46fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/e7/555e3c0f51a830e10000000a114084/content.htm
    XI point of View...
    Basically Once the TRFC or QRFC is funtion is over XI will place the Message into the Adapter engine queues based on the Comminication channel configuration.
    Suppose if it is and EO then XI ill place the message in any  Queue based on the free and priority and if configuration is done as per EOIO then XI ill place all the messages in the Same queue name so that it ill processes in order one after another and if the above message fails and remaining all other messages will be in the queue and doesnt process untill the failed mesages gets removed
    But in case of  EO it may be places in any queue and if one message fails then another message of same interface may processed sucessfully based on another queue order.
    I hope it wil be helpful to you...
    Regards::
    Amar Srinivas Eli

  • Whats the diff between express and pro??

    Just wondering what the main diff between the two are. I've used pro at school, but cant afford to get it at home. Will i still be able to use the same audio instruments like the same synths and plug ins??? Also, would i be able to run the program on a mac mini (top of the line)?

    Matt Mac 63, "Whats the diff between express and pro??" #5, 10:33pm Oct 18, 2005 CDT
    All I was saying is that if a person can afford to get Pro, they definitely should. The difference in features adds up to at least the difference in price, if not very much more.
    Having said that, Express is good value compared to most other DAW software at that pricepoint, but it is only intended as a 'Lite' version.
    Some examples, off the top of my head, of differences not made really clear in the comparison list.
    Input Objects:
    In Pro you can use Input Objects to monitor incoming signal without rec-enabling a track. That doesn't sound much, on the face of it, but what it means is you can use external FX units (hardware) as inserts in tracks (or busses) just like plugins, and bounce them with the mix. it also means you acn monitor what you are playing into Logic Pro with plugin FX applied, but record dry so you can hear your guitar with the reverb, or whatever, but still have the recorded dry signal so you can change the FX settings later.
    Pro has some very handy environment objects. The main one being the Trabsformer object. But also another extremely useful object is TouchTracks.
    If you've ever played with Ableton Live you would have noticed you can triger clips with the keyboard in all different ways (loop, gate loop, one shot etc.) Well TouchTracks does that with MIDI regions.(I have a feeling that feature in Live was modeled after Logic's TouchTracks' as it is incredibly similar.)
    They are only a few examples of a whole range of differences. If all the differences were itemized in the 'comparison chart' it would be about 3 pages long.
    All I am saying is, don't take the comparison chart as the definitive list of differences.
    yes, Express is a good basic tool and you can do a lot with it, with some imagination.
    The SOS author's claim that:
    you're paying less than a third of the price of Logic Pro and getting over 90 percent of the functionality."
    is not true in totality.
    It may be true to someone who has never dabbled in audio software before, because it takes literally years to become fully conversant with every function in Logic Pro, and no-one uses absolutely everything.
    But for serious users, who have big demands, in my opinion, Express is less than 30% of Pro's functionality.

  • Diff between Serialization and Synchronization

    Hi I am new to java.
    Pl. give me the difference between Serialization and Synchronization.
    Thankq
    Sridhar

    Don't you look at the timestamps of posts? They could
    have been typing at the same time.
    /KajPlease stop! I'll die laughing. LOL
    Re: Diff between Serialization and Synchronization
    Author: Annie.   Apr 11, 2005 10:30 AM (reply 1 of 4)  
    Re: Diff between Serialization and Synchronization
    Author: glrao   Apr 12, 2005 8:31 AM (reply 2 of 4) I really like your sense of humor.
    xH4x0r

  • Diff between dbms_profiler and dbms_trace

    Hi,
    what would be the major diff between dbms_profiler and dbms_trace? which is more useful.
    Thanks,
    Mathew

    DBMS_PROFILER is one way to analyse where the time is being spent

  • Diff between issession and issystem

    All,
    Wanted to understand ..When we need to restart he DB servers in case if we change some parameters ...?
    What is the diff between issession and issystem modifiable clauses ...?
    Thanks

    Got the answer

  • Diff Between PCC and PC by Order

    Dear Team,
    Why PCC does not support Actual Cost Method and Why PC by Order does't not support Target Cost Method?
    Please give your views and comments.
    Best Regards,
    Satish

    hi
    =========================
    what is diff between billing and invoice?
    From the help for cash order, it says that the invoice will print immediately after order created, the billing will be done seperately by transaction after delivery. Can anyone explain more detail.
    =================
    based on ur query.. Billing and Invoice are one and the same.. the difference is that in general business terminology Billing means the process of crediting the customer to the certain sum of money either by cash or credit, for the goods or services purchased by him... this process consists of many other documents like credit note, debit note, invoice, etc. 
    Invoice is the Printed format of the Bill ie, the sum of amount the customer is credited is made available in the printiable format....
    dont get confused by the Billing and Invoice words.. in simple way invoice is one of the documents generated during the billing process.. Billing is a process which consists of various different documents which are generated depending on the business requirements...
    Reward if USeful
    Thanx & regards.
    Naren..

  • Diff Between Interfaces and API

    Hi to all.
    Can anybody tell me , What is the basic diff between API and Interfaces ?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Lalit,
    Both place validation will happen. In Interface table as well as in API.
    The difference you can say..for interface you have to load the data in and invoke the import program by which it will populate data in oracle apps base table. So you have to write some DML.
    While in API you can simply use PLSQL record type and using that invoke API by which it will populate record in oracle apps base table.
    Keep in mind both ways the validation happens. It is just the approach and some part is just for legacy data conversion.
    Regards
    Prashant Pathak

  • Diff between ides and original package

    can any one tell me what are main diff between ides and original package
    thanks
    with regards,
    phani

    HI.,
                  IDES saytem is like a play ground in which we do all the transcations,But in Real time systme we dont have as many reference clients as IDES systme have,We have one reference client 0001 In real time systme as their land scape is laid as development,Testing & Production systems
              Important thing is all the screens & T.codes are sames in both
    REWARD if helpfull
    Thanks & Regards
    Narayana

  • Diff between cusztmizing and workbench request

    could u please let me know what is diff between workbench and custmizing req ?
    Regards

    Hello,
    customizing req vs workbench request
    Check this info.
    Workbench Requests
    When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
    Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
    Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
    Customizing requests
    Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
    Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
    Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
    Hope this resolves your query.
    Reward all the helpful answers.
    Regards,
    Jorge Diogo

  • Diff. between currency and unit fields

    Hi All,
    What is the diff. between 0DOC_CURRCY and 0CURRENCY, OUNIT and 0BASE_UOM? In which scenarios do we use each of them?
    I have a flat file which contains some values for sales and quantity but does not have any units. So I have to upload them using constant currency and unit. now, I have to create my own keyfigures for the sales and quantity. What currency and unit fields should I use i.e 0CURRENCY or 0DOC_CURRCY and OUNIT or 0BASE_UOM?
    Thanks a lot,
    James.

    hi James,
    0doc_currency, 0currency share the same master data->0currency, 0unit, 0base_uom share the same master data->0unit, the 'basic' infoobject is 0currency and 0unit, all currency and unit will have reference to these infoobjects.
    currency is used for keyfigures amount, with currency e.g usd, gbp, etc.
    unit for keyfigures quantity, with unit like KG, CM etc.
    currency tables are TCUR* and unit table T006*
    you can use any of these infoobject currency or unit in your keyfigure (RSD2) or fix value like USD etc, normaly 0doc_currcy used for document currency; 0loc_currcy for local currency, you can create your own infoobject currency/unit with RSD3.
    hope this helps.

  • DIFF BETWEEN DEPOT AND WARE HOUSE

    HI
    MY CLIENT IS IN THE TRADING NOT IN MANUFACTURING SO IS THERE RG23D REGISTER UPDATE?? BUT THEY CALLED IT DEPO.
    WAT IS DIFF BETWEEN DEPOT AND WAREHOUSE??
    POINTS WILL BE MAXIUM!!!!!!!!

    Dear Devesh,
    Depot
    A unit, in India, that is dedicated to the storage and sale of goods, as opposed to a manufacturing plant.
    Depots:Do not participate in the CENVAT scheme
    Depots:Are required to keep a register of all goods receipts and goods issues (register RG 23D)
    Warehouse
    An organizational division of a plant for managing materials stored in different places.
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Diff between JBI and JCA & JMS

    Hi,
    i am new to JBI. I want what is the diff between JCA and present JBI.
    any one can give some explanition and suggest some links to fine the content.
    Thanks In advance
    Pandu

    The challenge with JCA plugins is that the plugins don't know how to talk to each other as there is no standard way for them to communicate. Also, the installation of these plugins is not standardized. JBI spec is built around the WSDL model so any plugin can talk to any other plugin in a standard fashion. The routing of these messages is taken care by the normalized message router. Similarly the spec clearly spells out a packaging model for the plugin so that it can be installed into any standard container. Furthermore, by using standard JMX mbean mechanism, you can control the state of this plugin.
    Reg. the NMR implementation, the spec confines itself to a single VM. Whether NMR is built on top of a message broker or a simple router like what we have in Open ESB is up to the implementation choice.
    While a JMS based routing works for some of the configurations, requiring JMS for every routing decision is not optimal.
    Suresh

Maybe you are looking for