Difference between AQ Adapter and JMS Adapter

Hi All,
i am very new to SOA. let me know the difference between AQ Adapter and JMS Adapter.
thanks
Hari

Please go thru the bellow link
http://www.mscd.edu/~ittsdba/oradoc817/ois.817/a83729/adois07.htm#408020
Krishna

Similar Messages

What is the Difference between AQ adpater and JMS adapter??

What is the Difference between AQ adpater and JMS adapter in BPEL11g??
In what scenarios we go for AQ and for what scenarios we go for JMS adapter???

Go for AQ when using Oracle Advanced Queueing (the database stuff).
Use JMS when using JMS (in memory of file queues)
hth,
Peter Paul

The difference between SOAP adapter and WS adapter in PI 7.1

Hello all,
can anybody explain what is the main difference between SOAP adapter and WS adapter in PI 7.1?
I have checked this [link|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
but was not able to find the real difference.
Or better, what can I do with WS adapter I can't do with SOAP adapter? What are their advantages/disadvantages?
Thank you all, Igor.

In addition to RM, ws adapter also support other ws standard like SAML which is not available in SOAP adatper. Beside:
if your sender or receiver is SAP system, you can also monitor the message in the sender/receiver in addition to the PI box. This is a very good thing, because sometime the MONI in PI shows nothing wrong, but the MONI in your receiver will show you error message that's only related to the receiver system.
However, if you define ws sender CC, and your ws client doesn't support RM, you will have issue sending ws request.
And ws CC will generate ws runtime in PI box, if your configuration is wrong (like user name and password not correct), even if you correct it, the ws runtime sometime won't be regenated based on the correction. In this case you need to delete the ws CC/agreement, and re-create it with all correct information.
Beside make sure your basis team configured the PI system properly regarding ws. If not, you will have lot of pain to figure the problem which was my case.
Jayson

Difference between webservices model and adaptive webservices model

hi
Can any one explain me regarding Difference between webservices model and adaptive webservices model.
Thanks

Hi,
In old WS Model, ithere was no concept of logical destinations.
There if you are using a WSDL located on a server and if the location of the WSDL
changes, your application won't run. The deployed application using the WS Model will have trouble finding
the WSDL. As a result you'll have to again import the
model. Moreover old WS Model does not have re-import functionality.
But incase of AWS Model, you can desine logical destinations and even if the location of the WSDL changes, all you have to do is change the new url in the Visual Admin and not import the model again.
You can visit the following link for more details:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b04308ed-62d5-2910-b3a6-c26771b1c78e
Regards,
Nidhi

Difference between HTTP adapter and SOAP adapter

Hi All,
Can any one tell me abt what is the main difference between HTTP adapter and SOAP adapter.when we'll use these eactly?
Thanks
pullarao.

Hi Rao,
Please go through the below links to understand it:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1442 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
More links for SOAP Adapter:
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/09/03/invoke-webservices-using-sapxi
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9f/fdca3f01f33e1ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/69/a6fb3fea9df028e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
More links on HTTP adapters.
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/09/15/push-data-to-mvc-architectured-application-using-xi
/people/prasadbabu.nemalikanti3/blog/2006/02/27/collecting-and-bundling-vendor-records-from-different-multiple-interfaces-file-systempeoplesoft-and-sending-to-sap-r3-system-part-2
Regards,
Subhasha

Difference between OA Adapter and DB Adapter

Hi All,
i am very new to SOA, Let me know the difference between OA Adapter and DB Adapter.
thanks
Hari

The EBS (OA) Adapter is mainly a sort of wrapper around DB and AQ adapter supporting the different interfaces of EBS including Business Events(AQ).
The adapter introspects the Integration Repository. And it sets the responsiblity/application context for you when connecting. The ebs-user and responsibility are set in the wsdl. Using the database adapter you should take care of that yourself.
Honestly, if you're basically using custom-plsql api's or the pl/sql api's of ebs (eg. TCA) then you're perfectly fine with the DB-adapter. The only thing is that you should set the responsiblity in the pl/sql yourself (for example in the intialization block of the pl/sql package).
Regards,
Martien

Difference between XI adapter and HTTP adapter

Hi,
I am not very clear on the exact difference between XI adapter and HTTP adapter.
I want to know, when should we use XI adapter and when to use HTTP adapter.
Regards,
Santosh

Hi,
We use HTTP Adapter in case of the Application is trying to post the HTTP Request message to XI and able to receive the HTTP Message from XI also.
While using the HTTP as Sender , HTTP Sits on ABAP Stack and can able to communicate with the Integration Server Directly, No need of any Adapter here, it is adapterless communication
In Case of Client Proxies
Source application can directly interact with the XI by executing the report in SAP R/3 & will be able to send the XML data to IS,
So no need of the XI Adapter in this case to post xml to XI.
In Case of Server Proxies
Now XI has to post the xml data to the Target Application, here some thing shld be there to establish the medium with the Target System. So we use XI adapter here.
In the receiver case, we need XI Adaper to communicate XI integration Server with the Local Integration Engine( Which we made in SAP R/3's Business system as local IE) to post the data
Basically XI adapter will be used in normal scenarios also to communicate Adapter Engine with Integration Server internally while delivering the msg.
Check this Msg Flow how the XI Adapter is used in Normal Scenarios
Understanding message flow in XI
REgards
Seshagiri

Difference between File adapter and FTP adapter

hi,
I would like to know what is the difference between File adapter and FTP adapter
thanks
Yatan

Both file and ftp adapters are non-concurrent jca adaps, however we go for file adapters mostly when you have files on your local environment and do not need to wait for someone to FTP the files on a timely basis. In case of FTP Adapter, we would need an FTP Server, a remote location with access where in files pitch in for polling.
Also, File adapter is dependent on the local folder and OS, however FTP adapter is dependent on the local as well as the remote file system/OS/folder permissions/user access.

Difference between WCF-NetTCP and TCP/IP adapter

What is the difference between WCF-NetTCP and TCP/IP adapter ?
Are both work in the same way or there is any similarity in their working ?
Prakash

Hi Ashwin,
Yes,I am referring to Codeplex based community adapterhttp://tcpipbz2010.codeplex.com/ for TCP/IP
adapter.
As from your reply ,both adapters can perform the same task .Right ?
Actually I am using socket programming to connect TCP/IP adapter.
Can I do this with WCF-NetTCP adapter ?
Prakash

How can find the difference between iphone 5 Real Genuine adapter and fake adapter

Can anyone please tell me, How Can Find Difference between iphone 5 Real Genuine adapter and fake adapter....

That's about the only way. Many of the fakes are indistinguishable from genuine without taking them apart. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi-b9k-0KfE Note that BOTH of the adapters in this video are fake. Yet the one on the left looks identical to the "real thing".

Differences between SOAP Adapter and WS Adapter

Hi Experts,
In order to consume a service in SAP ECC by SAP PI 7.1, I´m using a service based on RFC. I tryed sucessfully to do that using SOAP Adapter and WS Adapter.
What are the differences between using a receiver communication channel with SOAP adapter or WS adapter? Which is the better way ?
Tks in advance.

Hi,
Please go through the below URLs for a discussion of SOAP and WS adapters:
The difference between SOAP adapter and WS adapter in PI 7.1
WS adapter vs. SOAP adapter
Regards,
Rajeev Gupta
Edited by: RAJEEV GUPTA on Jan 9, 2009 3:41 PM

Difference between EDN-DB and EDN-JMS implementation

Experts,
Looking for a difference between EDN-DB and EDN-JMS implementation. We have EDN implementation going on, where multiple source systems will be publishing business events. Events can be published using SOA Suite or JMS Bridge from AQ and MQ. In this scenario which implementation approach is suited better ?

Oracle Apps Adapter can be used for many other products other than E-Business Suite (JD Edwards E1, OTM, and others). The apps adapter was mainly used in ERP systems and was strong when you needed have added functionality other than just polling a db for a status / calling a stored procedure... It could connect out to other business services, xml gateways and so-on.
From a technical aspect / development perspective I always thought of that the Oracle Apps Adapter simplifies the development but, may is not flexible. The App Adapter's strength is the services that are difficult to integrate with (business services, xml gateway). If you need to hook in to these types of services, use the APPS adapter. (Again like it is named the "Apps Adapter" its for interacting w/ other applications to enable real-time processing / functionality.
That being said the dbAdapter can be very powerful but, like it is named is database focused (to poll some table to know when to kick off other logic and enable real-time functionality through database interaction.
Looking at the Oracle 12C Roadmap I had heard that there is more planned for the Oracle Apps Adapter moving forward, especially as Anuj said in the "Financial Apps" side of the isle at Oracle. Who knows what is real and what isn't though =]
Hope this helps!
-Luke

Diff between Seeburger Adapter and File Adapter

Hi All,
My company needs to interact with some banks and the banks are particular that they want SFTP, which is not supported by File Adapter, so we have decided to go with Seeburger adapter.
Now what are the differences between File adapter and seeburger adapter?
I believe that Seeburger adapter does not support File Content Conversion, Archiving etc.
Could you all pls put some light on the diff between file adapter and seeburger adapter when it comes to dealing with files?
Xier

Hi
You are aware with working of File Adapter.
The most direct way of using the Seeburger adaptors is to configure the BIC as a module. There is a software component from seeburger called bicmapper which will allow you to
1. Define or import the inbound message metadefinition in various formats ( edifact, xml,...)
2. Using a mapping create an xml variant as the output metadefinition or edifact in the other direction.
3. Create a one to one mapping between input en output.
4. Export the metadata in xsd or sda format for import in XI
5. Generate an SDA which can be deployed in XI and used as a module.
Have a look here,
http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/SAP_Exchange_Infrastructure_Integratio_Strategy.pdf
Some Seeburger related information
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e2aeb02c-0601-0010-d680-c9be61ffa390
Go through this threads:
http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/SAP_Exchange_Infrastructure_Integratio_Strategy.pdf
Need Material on Seeburger Adapters.
Seeburger Adapter
Installing seeburger adapter
http://www.seeburger.com/xi-adapters/
Thanks

Differences btw stb and digital adapter

can someone clarify what are the main differences between a stb and a digital adapter besides size and price.
i know you cant receive any hd signal right?

 DCT-700 Standard Definition Digital Adapter
(Dimensions: Width: 5.50” (13.97 cm), Depth: 6.60” (16.76 cm), Height: 1.75” (4.45 cm), Weight: ~0.85 lbs (~0.39 kg))
 Features:
 Can decode and play all Standard Definition (SD) channels
 Has Coax Out (Screw in) and Composite Out (Yellow, White, Red) to TV
 Is much smaller than our other Set Top Boxes (STBs)
 Restrictions:
 No High Definition (HD) content support
 No data features whatsoever (No Program Guide, VOD, Widgets, Games or IPTV)
 Cannot participate as a video client in a Multi-Room Digital Video Recorder setup (MR-DVR)
 Cannot view photos or stream music or videos from Home Media on the customer’s PC
 There are no buttons or displays, just a Power light – it requires the Verizon remote to operate
 QIP-2500 Standard Definition Digital Set Top Box
(Dimensions: Width: 14.72” (37.4 cm), Depth: 10.00” (25.4 cm), Height: 2.75” (6.9 cm), Weight: ~5.5 lbs (~2.50 kg))
 Features:
 Can decode and play all SD channels
 Has Coax Out, Composite Out, and S-Video Out (Round plug with 4 pins in it)
 Has full data features – IMG, PPV, VOD, Games, Widgets and IPTV all work fine
 Can participate as a video client in a MR-DVR setup (SD recordings only)
 Supports Digital Optical Audio and Digital SPDIF (also known as Coax Digital) Audio
 Restrictions:
 No HD content support
 Cannot view photos or stream music or videos from Home Media on the customer’s PC
Also there are DVR and HD stbs etc -- if you want any info on them just let me know. That is just the comparison of the digital adapter and standard stb.
Message Edited by DzWR on 04-17-2009 03:04 PM

(261680070) Q WWO-13 What are the difference between WLS6.1 and WLS7.0 web services?

Q<WWO-13> What are the difference between WLS6.1 and WLS7.0 web services?
A<WWO-13> The differences are huge, so different in fact that 6.1 web services cannot
be deployed in 7.0. WLS7.0 and Workshop have much greater functionality than the
limited stateless session (RPC-style) and JMS destination (MSG-style) approach of
6.1. Workshop web services can interact with any type of EJB, any JMS destination
as well as other web services and directly accessing databases. The framework for
building the web service is better and more adaptable and Workshop provides a fully
integrated develop, deploy, test and debug environment. Additionally, WLS7.0 have
the capacity to be much better at performance since due to XML parser enhancements
and the addition of XML maps.

If you want to take existing WLS6.1 web services and convert them to WLS7.0 you can
do so quite easily. The WLS7.0 Ant still supports wsgen so you do not need to even
change your build.xml file. The generated web service however will be implemented
is a manner compliant with the WLS7.0 environment. More details are at:
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/webServices/anttasks.html#1070576
"Adam FitzGerald" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Q<WWO-13> What are the difference between WLS6.1 and WLS7.0 web services?
A<WWO-13> The differences are huge, so different in fact that 6.1 web services
cannot
be deployed in 7.0. WLS7.0 and Workshop have much greater functionality
than the
limited stateless session (RPC-style) and JMS destination (MSG-style) approach
of
6.1. Workshop web services can interact with any type of EJB, any JMS destination
as well as other web services and directly accessing databases. The framework
for
building the web service is better and more adaptable and Workshop provides
a fully
integrated develop, deploy, test and debug environment. Additionally, WLS7.0
have
the capacity to be much better at performance since due to XML parser enhancements
and the addition of XML maps.

Difference between AQ Adapter and JMS Adapter

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for