Difference between CS3 and CS4 when placing images, percentage not kept

There is some kind of difference between CS3 and CS4 when placing images. The images I've dealt with right now were vector images but it might apply to all kinds of images.
When replacing an existing image, the CS4 behaviour is to let the image fill up the frame. In CS3 the percentage was set to 100% as default (the % you see when selecting the image, not the container).
Also when replacing an impage in CS4, the "inner" image frame is kept, while in C3, the percentage was kept.
Is there some kind of placement preferences / settings to let CS4 act the same wat as CS3 did, when placing an image?
-- Andreas

Yes, the behavior was changed in CS4 (and many users, like me, prefer the new system).
If you click and drag a loaded image place cursor the entire image will be be scaled to fit the proportionally drawn frame -- a huge timesaver if you mostly place uncropped art. If you want 100% of the image at 100% scale, just click and release -- same as before, or as before you can pre-draw a frame and place into it and your image will come in cropped at 100% (unless you've changed the fitting options for the frame before placing).
Peter

Similar Messages

Display Performance Difference between CS3 and CS4

I have a computer running CS3 and a computer running CS4. When I place an image in InDesign CS3, it looks way better than when I place it in CS4. The display performance for both computers are set exactly the same. Raster and Vector images are set to proxy, transparency is set to medium quality, Anti Aliasing is turned on.
The CS4 computer:
Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon
Processor Speed: 2.66 GHz
Number Of Processors: 2
Memory 4GB
System Version: Mac OS X 10.5.8 (9L31a)
CS3 computer:
Processor Name: PowerPC G5
Processor Speed: 2 GHz
Number Of Processors: 2
Memory 4GB
System Version: Mac OS X 10.5.8 (9L31a)
What am I missing? It is virtually every image.

"You can adjust the quality of the the display itself without altering the name of the setting."
Tried that. The end result is viewing images at the higher quality that slows down the machine.
"Also, the size and resolution of images plays a role in how large the previews are, and their quality."
The difference is very noticeable when the exact same image is placed at the exact same sizes in InDesign CS3 and CS4. Everything in the workflow remained the same, except the changing of InDesign files.

Differences between CS3 and CS4 files?

Could you please explain what was the differences between "Adobe illustrator cs4 eps files" and "Adobe illustrator cs3 eps files"?
Thank for looking into this.

The difference would be that CS 4 would support the features in AI CS 4 and CS 3 would not support those features.

Whats the difference between CS3 and CS4?

I am currently using Dreamweaver CS3 and am curious about CS4
enhancements. What features are new in CS4? Is it worth the money
to upgrade?

I read the above feature list without getting the answer. So
I went to the next step and downloaded the CS4 trial version. My
first impressions was: -"Where is everything? It is all grey, no
functions maybe?.
But that was not the case it was just a matter of new user
interface. One very nice touch was a drop down where it was
possible to select if you wanted "Classic" design look, which then
was similar to CS3. But it was also possible to chose "Coder" and
all the design stuff was minimized and the code window expanded.
Quite nice actually.
Well, I may put in some more comments later, when I have had
some time to play with CS4, but I wanted to post a second link to
"Whats New" and more importantly, what is removed;
For
new features...
...and for old removed ones:
quote:
Deprecated features
The following features have been deprecated for Dreamweaver
CS4:
- Timelines
- Web services
- Layout mode
- Site Map view
- Java Bean support
- Adobe® Flash elements (Image Viewer)
- Adobe® Flash text and Adobe® Flash buttons
- ASP.NET and JSP server behaviors and recordsets

Difference in selection tools between CS3 and CS4?

I have not used CS4 or 5. I read there are big differences from CS3 to CS4 with regards to making selections.
How much different are the following tools in CS4 over CS3?
- marquees
- laso tools
- magic wand
- quick mask
Thanks.

The tools you mention have not changed noticeably.
There are additional tools and refinements in later versions.

Need help with XML Compatibility between CS3 and CS4

I'm not a Dreamweaver guru but I am hoping someone will recognize my issue and be able to provide meaningful feedback.
Background:
A developer buddy and I are working together to create a new home page for an online retailer that utilizes flash banners. We're using XML to update the content of the banners. My buddy is creating the XML file and sending it to me to populate with content (i.e. descriptions, images, image paths, etc.). He is creating the XML file in CS3 and I am editing in CS4. Here's the issue: Whenever he uploads the populated XML file to the server the banners are displayed correctly. If I take the same file and upload it without editing, it works great. However, if I open the file, edit and resave before uploading to the web server, the the banners all have extra spaces between each line of content - almost as if it were double spaced. If you look at the code, the code looks fine. In fact, the code looks exactly like it did when my buddy sent the file to me. I believe we have isolated the problem to something weird with my installation of DW. I have downloaded and installed any and all updates. Oh yeah he's using a MAC version and I am using the PC version of DW.
Has anyone seen anything like this before???
Help...

Thank you for your response.
The code is listed below and to tell you the truth the following code is both good and bad. As I mentioned before, if my buddy sends me this xml file and I upload it to the server, it works fine. If I open the file and immediately save it without making any changes then upload it, I experience the previously described promblem. It's very strange. The code in both files is identical.
To get a clearer picture of what I am describing, go to http://www.everythingministry.com/beta3.htm. The book descriptions appear correctly under the "New and Recommended" tab. However, whenever I edit any one of the six xml files that control the content for each of these tabs it ends up looking like what you currently see under the "New Music" tab. I have actually tried to update from 2 different machines running DW CS4.
Below are the xml files for the two tabs I referenced in the paragraph above:
ts_new.xml
<items>
<config
Milliseconds="5000"
Distance="3"
BorderColor="0xffffff"
TargetLink="_top"
TextYPosition="200"
MaxDisplayContent="6"
ContentWidth="148"
ContentHeight="300"
TransitionSpeed="0.8"
TransitionType="0"
ShowMouseOver="0"
ShowBorder="1"
ShowGlass="1"
/>
   <content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Crazy Love
by Chan Francis
Price: $11.99
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/crazylove.aspx</link>
</content>
<content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Under the Sheets
by Dr. Kevin Leman
Price: $9.99
You Save: 29 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/underthesheetsthesecretstohotsexinyourmarriage.aspx</link>
</content>
<content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Outlive Your Life
by Max Lucado
Price: $19.99
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/outliveyourlifebymaxlucadohardcover.aspx</link>
</content>
<content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Love Dare Day By Day
Wedding Edition
Price: $16.79
You Save: 27 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/lovedaredaybyday-weddingedition.aspx</link>
</content>
     <content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Life Interrupted
by Priscilla Shirer
Price: $11.99
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/lifeinterruptednavigatingtheunexpected.aspx</link>
</content>
<content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Faithful Fasting
by Errica L. Williams
Price: $8.79
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/faithfulfasting.aspx</link>
</content>
<content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[When Couples Walk Together
Price: $9.59
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/whencoupleswalktogetherjan2011-paperback.aspx</link>
</content>
</items>
ts_music.xml
<items>
<config
Milliseconds="5000"
Distance="3"
BorderColor="0xffffff"
TargetLink="_top"
TextYPosition="200"
MaxDisplayContent="6"
ContentWidth="148"
ContentHeight="300"
TransitionSpeed="0.8"
TransitionType="0"
ShowMouseOver="0"
ShowBorder="1"
ShowGlass="1"
/>
   <content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Until the Whole
World Hears
Price: $12.76
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/untilthewholeworldhearscd.aspx</link>
</content>
<content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[Move
by Thirda Day
Price: $11.19
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/move.aspx</link>
</content>
<content>
    
    <description><![CDATA[And If Our God
Is For Us
Price: $11.19
You Save: 20 %
<img src="images/addtocart.jpg" width="146" height="17">]]></description>
    <link>http://www.everythingministry.com/andifourgodisforuscd.aspx</link>
</content>
</items>

A question about a difference between CS3 and CS6 (sorry if it's wrong addressed)

When I place in InDesign (both CS3 and CS6) a transparent tif image (CMYK) there is a difference between those created in Photoshop CS3 (correct) and CS6 (white background). Why?

EDIT: With the new InDesign CS6 update (8.1) Photoshop CS6 tifs with transparency import correctly now. Thank you

Color differences between LR and CS4

I've recently switched from PC to MacbookPro and installed latest versions of Lightroom and CS4. I do most of my editing in Lightroom and sometimes export to Photoshop. I noticed that there is a huge difference between the colors in Lightroom vs the colors in Photoshop even with NO editing done at all when I firt import to Lightroom. I import my raw files into Lightroom, do no editing, reset the files to ensure no editing, and then export into Photoshop and the image looks totally different color wise. Any ideas as to why?? My color settings are all set to srgb consistanty amongst all the 2 systems. Any other thoughts on what could be causing this? THanks

>I change the color working space in PS from my monitor profile (Eye One display tool-generated) to ProPhotoRGB, which is apparently what LR uses.
You NEVER EVER want to use the monitor profile as the working space. The only exception is when you make small graphics (i.e not photographs) for websites that need to match CSS code. Photoshop needs to be setup as the first image in
this link i.e. using a standard workingspace (mostly sRGB, adobeRGB, or prophotoRGB) and to respect all embedded profiles.
>In other words, if I use the calibrated monitor profile in both the system preferences color profile (i.e., on my MacBook Pro) and in PS, the PS and LR images don't match. I'd really love to solve this problem, or determine what I don't understand here. Thanks, Mitch
Photoshop does not need to be told about the monitor profile. It already automatically converts everything you see to it since it knows the monitor profile by simply asking the system software. What you see in your case is that Lightroom (or ACR if you use the RAW photoshop integration) correctly exports the image in a standard color space (whatever you choose in Preferences) and then you have set up Photoshop to completely disregard this fact and treat the image as if it was in the monitor profile. This is not a good thing to do.

Could someone please help with two differences between CS and CS4?

Hello, I just moved from Photoshop CS to CS4 and have a couple of questions regarding some differences I'm seeing in the two versions.
(1) When opening files, I'm used to them opening in a smaller view as individual windows. CS4 opens all images in the expanded view. Is there a way to prevent this from happening? I create massive sports photo galleries (often more than 100 images) and usually open 25-30 images at a time, then minimize all images and work on them one at a time in chronological order. The was CS4 opens these images in full screen mode, it prevents me from doing this in a timely manner - PS never opens a group of photos up in a true chrono order. It misplaces the first image to the end.
(2) In CS, I used to be able to Right-Mouse-Click on the image's title bar to change Image and Canvas sizes. Any way to get this to work in CS4? CTL+ALT and either I or C is a three-key process and takes considerably longer than right clicking my mouse and choosing the correct option.
Thanks for any help you can provide. And apologies for being such a newbie to the latest and greatest Photoshop version. I've been living in CS for years
Mike

You are a life saver. Thanks! I looked in the INTERFACE area about three times and never understood that TABBED meant that it was opening them full screen.
Any idea how to deal with question #2? Cannot set up an ACTION for this as the action makes me have to choose an image size. I just want to have the Image or Canvas size windows open with one click, rather than holding down three keys.
Thanks again. You have been rewarded with a CORRECT ANSWER click
Mike

Problems moving between CS3 and CS4 - missing plugins

Hello all. Sorry if this is a really obvious question. I'm still sort of new to InDesign.
I'm working on a newsletter right now that I originally created using CS3. When the CS4 trial came out, I downloaded it, and the file it automatically transferred to opening on that version by default and I finished it up on CS4. Now my CS4 trial has run out and I don't want to buy it, but instead would like to keep working on the newsletter in CS3. When I try to open it in CS3 however, it says a ton of plugins are missing, namely:
conditional text
word ready
appframework
indexing
xml
generic page item
package and preflight
image
master page
incopy shared
cjk text attributes
assignments
spread
text
links
toc
text attributes
scripting
hyperlinks
document framework
cjk grid
workgroup
text wrap
whew! I'm pretty sure I have all the current updates. I tried looking for some of the plugins but I'm not really sure how to go about this or even if it's the right solution.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! We wanted to get the newsletter to our printer before the holidays but that's not looking so great now.
Thanks in advance!
Alyssa

You cannot open a CS4 file in CS3. If you'd like to email me the file,
I'll save it back as an INX file for you. Depending upon what features
you used in CS4 it may or may not be satisfactory...new features will be
lost or badly mangled and text is quite likely to reflow.
Bob

Difference between 'Continent' and 'Country' when ...

I couldn't find an answer to this on either this forum or on another medium.
My phone is C5, I live in the Netherlands and I use the most recent updates of my firmware, Nokia Maps and Nokia Suite.
On the Maps-tab in Nokia Suite (also in former Ovi Suite), we can download:
-map-data country per country;
-every country in a continent by clicking 'Download All' in the top of the screen;
(with both of these, the countries indeed are downloaded separately when I check the "downloading"-tab)
-the whole continent at once by dragging-and-dropping the name of the Continent to the "On device" part of the screen (then, I see only e.g. "Americas" in the downloading-tab)
It all starts downloading, works perfectly.
Sometimes I noticed a difference between the data in the application when downloading the continent-at-once and downloading country-by-country (or clicking 'Download All'). However, I can't pinpoint it. There's also a difference in the total amount (MB's) of data stored extra on the device.
Is it that some countries (say, "Nepal" or "Ecuador") are not included in the country-by-country, but are in the continent-download?
Is it that the continent only downloads all the low-detail info (so until you zoom in), while the separate country-by-country gives me the exact opposite; High detail but no 'terrain-view' if I zoom out?
Sorry for a lot of text... , and thanks for any advice!

@Newgarden
Just to add to the confusion there are anomalies with some island(s) which neither seem to be included as a country's dependencies nor are included with the nearest land mass, but yet data is present if World map data is downloaded; whether the reasoning is that as probably small amount of data it can be downloaded with Ovi Maps in "Online" mode if needed I know not.
Happy to have helped forum with a Support Ratio = 42.5

Difference between Firefox and Safari when viewing iWeb created content.

Greeting Mac fans,
I've noticed that my iWeb pages load 2-3 times faster when viewed in Firefox than Safari. I find this a little suprising.
Also, my hit counter shows when the page is displayed in Firefox, but not in Safari.
Any ideas?
All content was created using iWeb and is hosted at my dotmac account. I have a domain name and I'm also using "masked URL fowarding"
Peace
super_tee
Emac 1.25ghz Mac OS X (10.4.8) Packed to the eyeballs with goodies....

There are two things that I think are at play
here...
First, the difference in loading times between
FireFox and Safari.... I haven't noticed that huge of
a difference myself, but what I have noticed is that
FireFox is much faster at pulling up cached
material....or maybe figuring out whether to pull
from cache vs. anew. I've noticed that FireFox also
hangs on to cached material more tenaciously than
Safari, meaning that sometimes I have to go in and
empty FireFox's cache in order to see something
update...I have to do this much more often in FireFox
than Safari.
Second, about your counters. If you turn your
masking off from your domain forwarding, you .Mac
counters will be visible to all. Using masking will
make them invisible to certain browsers under certain
conditions.
James, I guess I should download and use Firefox, but remember feeling burned the last time I did. I downloaded it, and soon after, things went awry with my computer. I am hoping that the were unrelated events, since Leo Laporte, the KFI techie guru, also recommends using Firefox for various reasons. He says that it is very safe because, basically, it is "dumb" (his words). But he meant that it's lack of bells and whistles made it go very fast, and made it avoid all the problems of Internet Explorer.
Lorna in Southern California

Difference between Gmail and Exchange when setting up email

Hi all,
When adding my Gmail email details in Settings in iOS7 (Via Settings > Mail, Contacts, Calendars > Add Account) I’m presented with the options to use Exchange or Google.
I know back in the early days of the iOS it was always preferable to use Exchange as it synced everything on your phone perfectly (mail, contacts, calendar) but it seems that now the Google option is just as good…?
Other than the capability to push emails to my device (a function that I don't use anyway), is there any other difference between the Exchange and Google options when setting up email?
Thanks,
David

I've tested it out on my iOS7 5s; the calendar and contact syncing seems to work absolutely fine though?
This was in reference to the Google option. It syncs mail, calendar, contacts and notes all absolutely fine as far as I can see - I wanted to check I wasn't missing anything.
Any need to get narky there?

CMYK/Pantone differences between CS3 and CS6

I have a file that was created in CS3. Pantone 534 C was used and the CMYK value that was shown was 100, 80, 30, 5. When I open the file in CS6 and choose Pantone 534 C, the CMYK value is shown as 98, 85, 36, 27. Am I going to get the same tone of blue when I print the file from the CS6 version as I did when I printed the file from the CS3 version?
In essence, is the PMS tone that was in CS3 the same PMS tone that is in CS6? I'm assuming it is, but wanted to confirm. And can anyone explain why the CMYK values have changed between the two versions if I'm using the same PMS number?

J,
My problem is, which CMYK values should I use to most closely match the Pantone 534C color? Should I use the CMYK values in CS3 or CS6 (because they are different numbers)?
I believe someone from Pantone would vote for CS6 because they have changed the values to more closely match the solid colours.
But the proof of the pudding is the eating, so you should try both and see what you think.
Some solid Pantone inks are impossible to match closely with CMYK, and who says that the closer match (by the parameters chosen) is the better/prettier/nicer colour?

Color Issues between CS3 and CS4

Color Issue - Opened in CS3...looks fine; I then opened in CS4 and what
was grey in CS3 is now brownish in CS4.
Any ideas about what this is or how to fix?

Sorry, actually, there was a thread up a ways and someone was having the
exact same issue. It was my color profile. I just deleted the default
and used Adobe 1998...
With that said, I am CERTAIN that in not too much longer, I will run
into this again and it will be nice to have this seed (solution) planted
in my brain..
Thanks
[email protected] wrote:
> I am assuming that your Edit>Color Settings in both versions are set the same.
>
> In CS4, this can be related to the new OpenGL functionality. Try turning off OpenGL drawing in Edit>Preferences>Performance and see if that helps. If it is already off, try turning it on. :)
>
> If by doing this, you confirm that it appears OpenGL-related, then you might try playing with the Advanced Settings of OpenGL Drawing, particularly the one that says "Color Matching".
>
> If it appears OpenGL-related but you can't find a way to fix the problem AND retain the OpenGL features, check to see if there is an updated version of your video card driver available. If so, download, install, and try it to see if that helps.

Difference between CS3 and CS4 when placing images, percentage not kept

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for