Difference between Distribution and Workflow

Hi Friends,
I am briefing my understanding about Docuemnt distribution.
We can send mails to various recepients internal / external as per prescribed format . In this one we can send Original files also. We can set automatic or can be done manually for distribution. This is only for information purpose.
My requirement is I need to send documents for different people for taking decision like reviewing or approving. After changing the status of DIR for a Doc. type. System should trigger a mail (information along with link) to user MS outlook along with a decision step in SAP inbox. When user clicks MS outlook link it will direct to SAP. After entering user ID & password it will take u to SAP in Inbox. or user can directly go to SAP Inbox can see the work items. He can take decision for review / reject / approve statuses accordingly status of the DIR will change.
Is the above scenario possible in Document distribution or need to be done thru Workflow only.
Since SAP has done many developments for Document distribution, I am thinking without much development of workflow we can use this functionality.
Thanx & Regards,
Sai Krishna

Hi Sai,
This is done thru workflow. when the status will chnage the relevant user (releaser/approver) will receive the mail in his MS outlook and from there he will give the decision and the status will be updated automatically in SAP DMS. This is achived thru workflow( example: Agents). Take help from abap consultant and develop the workflow as per your status network.
and mails will be triggered to concerns and they will approve from outlook.
Distribution as i know is maual process.
I hope this will resolve the query.
Regards,
Ravindra

Similar Messages

  • Difference between Distribution and Assessment cycle

    Hi,
    Can any one help me regarding the above(Difference between Distribution and Assessment cycle)
    Thanks in advance
    Rajani

    HI,
    Assessment:
    Assessment was created to transfer primary and secondary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During assessment, cost centers or business processes can be used as senders .n The receivers for an assessment can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a
    business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing. n Primary and secondary postings are allocated at the end of the period by means of the user-defined
    key.
    n During assessment, the original cost elements are summarized into assessment cost elements
    (secondary cost element category = 42). As the system writes fewer totals records, the assessment
    has a better performance than periodic reposting and distribution.
    n Line items are posted for the sender as well as for the receiver, enabling the allocation to be recorded
    exactly. The system does not display the original cost elements in the receivers. Therefore,
    assessment is useful if the cost drilldown for the receiver is not important, for example, as in the case
    of the allocation for the "cafeteria" cost center.
    n Similar to distribution, the partner is updated in the totals record during distribution.
    n You can reverse assessments as often as required.
    n You use the Cycle -Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships.
    Distribution:
    Differences between periodic reposting and distribution are due to information content and
    performance.
    n For periodic reposting, no separate credit record is written on the sender for the cost element in the
    summary report. Instead, the totals record for the cost element is reduced on the debit side, which
    means that the original debit amount can no longer be checked there ("unclean credit"). However,
    during distribution, the system writes a totals record for the credit ("clean credit"). The information
    on the receiver is the same for periodic reposting and distribution ("clean debit").
    n Compared with periodic reposting, during distribution, the system also updates the partner in the
    totals record for the sender. This means that the partner can be displayed in the information system
    on the totals record level.
    n As fewer totals records are written during periodic reposting, performance is better than during
    distribution. See customizing for an example with figures that illustrates this aspect. Under utilities,
    make settings for the SAPscript text display, then call up the text by choosing Periodic reposting,
    Distribution, or Assessment from the menu.
    Regards,
    Meenakshi

  • What is the difference between action and workflow? How do I decide that I need an action in a transaction and not a workflow and vice versa?

    Dear Experts,
    I have few doubts and request your expert inputs to clarify my doubts.
    What is the difference between action and workflow? How do I decide that I need an action in a transaction and not a workflow and vice versa?
    Your earliest response is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    SMTP

    Hi SMTP,
    First of all, as I mentioned action is nothing but an executable work item which is designed in the workflow itself. In other words, Workflow is like your OOPS class. At run time, workflow instances are created just like objects of classes. Now, the steps designed in the workflow are called TASKS and the instances of tasks are called WORKITEMS. Now, the work items where any user action is required are called executable work items. ANd the work items where no user action is required (for example, sending an email in background) are called non-executable work items.
    Whether to go with development of workflow or not depends upon your business scenario. If your requirement is only to send an email and you find any BAdi or exit where in you can write your logic then there is no need of creating a workflow. If there is a defined business process with defined users and time lines, then you can go with the development of workflows.
    Rest, the below link will help you in understanding basic concepts of workflow :
    Why use SAP Workflow? | Insight Consulting Partners
    Regards,
    Richa

  • What is difference between distribution list and share point group? Can we add distribution list into person and group column of share point list?

    what is difference between distribution list and share point group? Can we add distribution list into person and group column of share point list?

    there is a workaround you can try, create audience and add DL to them and deal with the audience or convert DL to groups
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/02f0d773-8188-4d94-a448-0c04d838b0cf/distribution-lists-in-sharepoint?forum=sharepointgenerallegacy
    Kind Regards,
    John Naguib
    Technical Consultant/Architect
    MCITP, MCPD, MCTS, MCT, TOGAF 9 Foundation
    Please remember to mark your question as answered if this solves your problem

  • Difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow

    Hello guys,
    Is there any difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow?
    Are there others workflows types in SAP?
    In all SAP Workflow Courses (BIT600, BIT601, BIT603, BIT610) only was talked about SAP Business Workflow, and nothing about CRM Workflow.
    Thanks a lot!
    Kleber

    Hello Kleber,
    There is not much of the differance between CRM workflows and SAP Business  workflows..
    Workflows are esentially part of Basis (BC) components and hence its the same across all SAP products as all these products have components of Basis(BC) in them...
    To Conclude, SAP Busines workflows and CRM workflows are the same things... However when you work on CRM, the BOR objects would be belonging to CRM and not to ECC... However conceptwise , there in no change at all.. If you learn BIT100......, you can also work on CRM workflows..
    Regards,
    Anand

  • Difference between Header and Item level distribution of GOA

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me the difference between distribution of GOA at header level and item level?
    can we create multiple operational contracts in ECC when we distribute one GOA?
    Thanks
    Sindhu

    Hi
    Which ECC Version are you using ?
    The transaction for creating a GOA in SAP Frontend is BBP_CTR_MAINCC. The Transaction BBP_CTR_MAINCC cannot be called in the Easy Access. Go with /N then call the transaction.
    <b>Please go through the links below for more details -></b>
    Note 646903 - GOA - Tips and Tricks
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/58/2a8442a07b0e53e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/43/05c0c685da6e72e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/00/f5c93f4d903b1ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/fe/14b042fa34b211e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Hope this will definitely help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ASSESSMENT AND DISTRIBUTION

    Dear Friends,
    What is the main difference between Assesment and Distribution?
    Thanks in advances.

    Hello,
    Please follow the forum rules
    1. No capital letters
    2. Search before posting
    DISTRIBUTION =========== Distribution was created for transfer primary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During distribution, only cost centers or business process can be used as sender. A distribution receiver can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing. Primary Postings (such as, energy costs) are collected on a cost center, and allocated at the end of the period by means of the user-defined key. You can only distribute primary costs. During this process, the original cost element remains the same. Line items are posted for the sender as well as for the receiver, enabling the allocation to be recorded exactly. You can reverse distributions as often as required. You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships. PERIODIC REPOSTING ================= Differences between periodic reposting and distribution are due to information content and performance. For periodic reposting, no separate credit record is written on the sender for the cost element in the summary report. Instead, the totals record for the cost element is reduced on the debit side, which means that the original debit amount can no longer be checked there (u201Cunclean creditu201D). However, during distribution, the system writes a totals record for the credit (u201Cclean creditu201D). The information on the receiver is the same for periodic reposting and distribution (u201Cclean debitu201D). Compared with periodic reposting, during distribution, the system also updates the partner in the totals record for the sender. This means that the partner can be displayed in the information system on the totals record level. As fewer totals records are written during periodic reposting, performance is better than during distribution. ASSESSMENT =========== Assessment was created to transfer primary and secondary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During assessment, cost center or business processes can be used as senders. The receivers for an assessment can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing. Primary and secondary posting are allocated at the end of the period by the user-defined key. During assessment, the original cost elements are summarized into assessment cost elements (secondary cost element category = 42). As the system writes fewer total records, the assessment has a better performance than periodic reposting and distribution. The system does not display the original cost elements in the receivers. Therefore, assessment is useful if the cost drilldown for the receiver is not important. Similar to distribution, the partner is updated in the totals record during distribution You can reverse assessments as often as required. You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships. Regards, Ravi

  • Difference between Swdd and Swdb in Workflow Creation..

    Hi,
    Why there is two transactions Swdd and Swdb to Create Customized workflow?What is the difference between Swdd and Swdb?Thanks in advance....

    Hi,
    SAP SWDD
    SAP Description: Workflow Builder
    SAP Report Program: RSWDSTRT
    and
    SAP SWDB
    SAP Description: Create workflow
    SAP Report Program: RSWDBUILD
    Both are associated with different SAP Programs. One build work flow and one create new.
    Hope this will help.
    Reward Point if helpful.
    Thanks,
    Raja

  • Difference between k2 and designer workflow?

    Hi All,
    What is the Difference between k2 and designer workflow? Thanks in advance!

    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/fc569e59-57fd-4c5b-9786-fd06d9dd78ea/sharepoint-2013-workflow-vs-k2-workflow?forum=sharepointgeneral
    SharePoint 2013 has many improved
    features, one of them is workflow engine, the new workflow platform, dubbed ‘workflow manager’, brings with it many new enterprise class capabilities, like: high density and multi-tenancy, instance management, fully declarative authoring, you can refer to
    following article to better understand this:
    workflow in SharePoint 2013:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/sharepoint/jj556245.aspx
    For k2 workflow comparing with SharePoint,
    I know little about k2 workflow, the following discussion seems contains related information:
    http://www.k2underground.com/forums/t/15608.aspx

  • Difference between Assessments and distribution

    Hi co experts,
    As per our knowledge the Difference between Assessments and distribution is distribution allocates primary cost elements and an assessment allocates both primary and secondary coat elements.
    My doubt is, Apart from the above sentence is there any other difference between assessments and distribution.
    Regards
    venkataswamy

    Hi,
    I just want to make one correction from  Dublin statement for cost element category. Actually the concept he explained is correct.
    @ Distribution: The data use are for primary cost element only, and the cost are record on receiver side using original  
                            cost element.
    @ Assessment: We can use either Primary cost Element or Secondary cost Element. The cost recorded on receiver side is
                            using Assessment Cost Element (Cost element category 42) not the cat 43, the cat 43 is for cost allocation.
    Hope this help you.
    Regards,
    Iie

  • What is the difference between ERP2004 and SAP 47 Enterprise?

    Currently we have SAP 47 Enterprise with WAS 6.2. I understand ERP2004 is NW and 6.4 sp9. Can any one please let me know the major difference between ERP2004 and SAP 4.7 Enterprise ( more from abap / workflow view)?
    Thanks
    Swamy

    From Abap point of view some of the major add-on in erp2004,netwever :
    1) Development of webdynpro studio for java development for portal and iviews.
    2) Major abap development uses <b>Abap object oriented</b> methodology, rathet hten old conventional Abap,i.e MVC model (Model,View,Controller) where in it uses concept of classes,interfaces,etc.
    3) Advanced BSP tech using MVC model to develop web based modules
    4) It is closesly integrated with web-based CRM and BW/APO

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BAPI AND ALE

    HI
    COULD ANYBODY TEL ME
    DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BAPI AND ALE

    Hi Kalyan
    ALE is a SAP specific method how to distribute data from and to SAP. It uses the asynchronous calls based on IDOC structures.
    However in the distribution modell of ALE can also be used BAPIs. They will then automatically converted into IDOC structures. After creating the IDOCs they will be passed over to the receiver using the tRFC protocol.
    Wheras the BAPIs are using the sRFC protocol.
    fir more information please check this:
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/ale-bapi.htm
    regards
    Srinivas

  • Differences between MIC and Process control

    Hi
    Could someone please let me know what are the major differences between MIC and process control 2.5.
    I have heard that Process control 2.0 is not being used now.
    So could you please let me know what the differences for MIC and Process control 2.5.
    Regards
    Sandhya

    Hi Sandhya,
    the major differences are:
    - automated controls (SAP and non-SAP systems)
    - UI interface based on NetWeaver Business Client (NWBC)
    - flexibility on scheduling assessments and tests based on control attributes
    - configurable reports and extraction to either .pdf or .xls
    - possibility to se configure workflow to send reminders and escalations
    - integration with Access Control 5.3, RAR component
    - concept of service providers allowing controls to be referenced between different organizations (former MIC orgunit)
    - assessments based on surveys (questions to be answered)
    - effectiveness tests based on test plan (both tests and steps)
    Regards
    Andre Yuji

  • Differences between rfc and ale/idoc.

    hi ..
           will u please send the differences between rfc and ale/idoc's.

    Hi,
    Please reward with points if helpful................
    ALE is SAP proprietary technology that enables data communications between two or more SAP R/3 systems and/or R/3 and external systems. There are three layers in ALE system: application services, distribution services, and communication services.
    For communication services, ALE performs a Remote Function Call (RFC) using the port definition and RFC destination specified by the customer model. RFC is used to communicate between applications of different systems in the SAP environment includes connections between SAP systems as well as between SAP systems and non-SAP systems. Remote Function Call (RFC) is the standard SAP interface for communication between SAP systems. The RFC calls a function to be executed in a remote system.
    Means of creating and operating distributed applications.
    The purpose of Application Line Enabling is to guarantee a distributed, but integrated, R/3 installation. This involves business-controlled message exchange with consistent data across loosely linked SAP applications.
    Application integration is achieved not via a central database, but via synchronous and asynchronous communication.
    Application Link Enabling comprises the following three layers:
    application services
    distribution services
    communication services
    Two Development Models
         Distribution using BAPIs
         Distribution using Message type
    The programming model "Distribution using message types" contains the definitions of message types and IDoc types and the ABAP code for processing inbound and outbound IDocs.
    Defining message types and IDoc types:
    If you want to create message type enhancements for master data distribution, you also have to create a new message type for each enhancement.
    The ALE interface does not allow you to create different segment data for different IDoc types for the same message type.
    Writing ABAP code:
             Outbound Processing
               Inbound Processing
    You can find information on other ALE functions under:
                                   Master Data Distribution
                                  Communicating with Non-R/3 Systems
    1. The Remote Function Call facility allows you to call an R/3 Function module on a “remote” machine.
    2.  To communicate between two R/3 Systems and also with an External System.  External Application program also can call these function module for integration.
    3. RFC or sRFC  - Synchronous RFC
                     aRFC - Asynchronous RFC
                      tRFC - Transactional RFC
                      qRFC - Queued RFC (I.e. Serialization of tRFC)
    Types of RFC Call
    Synchronous
    CALL FUNCTION Func Destination Dest
    CALL FUNCTION func DESTINATION 'NONE' ...
    CALL FUNCTION func DESTINATION ’BACK' ...
    Asynchronous
    CALL FUNCTION func … STARTING NEW TASK taskname
    PERFORMING form ON END OF TASK
    RECEIVE RESULTS FROM FUNCTION func
    Thanks
    sivaparvathi

  • What is the difference between ALE and EDI

    Hi,
    Can any one please explain what is the difference between ALE and EDI ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Ramana

    Hi Ramana
    ALE: used to trnasfer IDOC with in the R3distributed system.
    EDI: used to transfer IDOC from R3system to nonsap system
    IDOCS:
    IDOCS are intermediary documents which are like CARRIERS of the data
    IDOCs are safe to transfer data, but less volume of data. User is not allowed to access (modify) the data like PSA. IDOCs have 3 parts.
    1. Control Record - SOURCE & TARGET details,
    EDI
    EDI concept in SD: the EDI concept is intended to realize the sales and distribution process completely automatically with the help of electronical documents. These documents are sent from one customer to another, are processed mostly on the background and give a possibility to realize the sales process extremely efficiently.
    While IDocs have to be understood as a data exchange protocol, EDI and ALE
    are typical use cases for IDocs. R/3 uses IDocs for both EDI and ALE to
    deliver data to the receiving system.
    check these links also
    EDI document
    http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/eac/knowledgebaseAnswer/0,295199,sid63_gci983331,00.html
    http://searchsap.techtarget.com/loginMembersOnly/1,289498,sid21_gci879631,00.html?NextURL=http%3A//searchsap.techtarget.com/ateQuestionNResponse/0%2C289625%2Csid21_gci879631%2C00.html
    http://sapabap.iespana.es/sapabap/sap/faq/ale_idocs_bapi.htm
    Reward all helpfull answers
    Regards
    Pavan

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to Create Table Using Column Drag and Drop Feature

    Hi: I am new to Oracle SQL dev Data Modeler tool and would like to know if there is a way to create a new table by re-using the existing columns or column groups. The idea is to maintain consistency and save table design time. If columns created prev

  • Different valuation types with same vendor

    Hi, I have a senario as follows: I am procuring a material say HNB1084 ( Fuel pump ) from a Vendor V1. The HNB1084 can be supplied at two states superfinish & Standard buffing. The cost of superfinish is Rs. 150/- whereas that of standard buffing is

  • Error Handling for batch inserts

    Hi, Firstly, apologies if this has been asked before but I haven't been able to find the answer. I'm inserting a batch of rows, each of which could fail for different reasons (e.g. constraint, space, etc.). However, when I receive multiple failures a

  • Cannot get songs out of itunes library

    This is an very complex problem and if you can solve it you are a legend. I have spent an hour on the phone to apple tech support with no luck. I have donwloaded some songs I do not want. They were directly downloaded to my iphone. Now when I delete

  • T & L - Europe

    Experts, We currently follow a little complicated/manual process and I am looking for thoughts and view to keep it simple. To reimburse T & L expenses out of pocket for Europe employees, we create each employee as a vendor and then when we receive T