Difference between Firewall and Router

I can do VPN remote access configuration by using cisco firewall also I can do it using the cisco router by using the SDM program so what is the benefits from using the firewall or all of them are the same?
I mean it's recommended to use the firewill? if yes, why ?

Answer-
1) WE can make Security-Level on Firewall,but router can't
2) We can make firewall in multiple context(Virtual Firewall) but router can't
3) We can create SSL VPN on Firewall,but router can't
4) Whenever a packet inspected by Firewall and another packet comes with same contents then firewall didn't check that packet,
  but router checks all packets.(show connections)
5) Firewall works as L2 and L3 both, but router only on L3.
6) Firewall inspects packets on L3 to L7 but router works on L3.
7) Firewall have Failover,router can't
8) Whenever we take trace,then firewall cannot comes on picture,but router always shows as a Hop Count.

Similar Messages

  • RV042 - What's a practical difference between gateway and router mode

    That´s my scenario, I have a RV042 as gateway  on subnet 192.168.254.0,subnet 192.168.0.0 on the same LAN and  3 vpn tunnels connected GATEWAY TO GATEWAY on subnet 192.168.1.0,192.168.2.0 and 192.168.4.0. I setup 192.168.0.0 as Multiple Subnet on RV042 so now i can ping 192.168.0.0 from RV042 but i can´t do this from clients. What i want to know is What will happen if i change RV042 mode from gateway to router and What do i do to make clients (workstations) on subnet 192.168.254.0 reach clients in subnet 192.168.0.0 .
    Thx
    Everyone

    Gateway mode = RV042 does NAPT (network address & port translation);
    Router mode = RV042 does not do NAPT

  • Any speed difference between Apple Wifi Router(air express) and Tp link(or others) wifi router)

    Any speed difference between Apple Wifi Router(air express) and Tp link(or others) wifi router?
    I'm using a tp link router and sometimes it takes a long time delay for my 2 mac computers to connect each other. I don't know this is because of the router compability or the computers.

    Anyone knows?

  • What is the fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?

    Hello to all,
    After reading several RFCs, guides and HOWTOs I am confused by an apparently trivial question - what is the basic, fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?
    I am well aware that - said in a very primitive way - the classful routing does not make use of netmasks and instead uses the address classes while the classless routing utilizes the netmasks and does not evaluate the address classes.
    However, already in 1985 the RFC 950 (Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure) stated that the networks can be further subnetted using the network mask. Since then the routers are expected to use network masks in the routing decision process in the precise way they use it nowadays. However, if the routers use network masks they are doing the classless routing, aren't they? Where is then the difference if we used to describe the 80's way of routing as a classful routing? Or was it already the classless routing? The RFCs about CIDR came gradually only in 1992 and 1993.
    If somebody could give me an insight into the key difference between classful and classless routing (and perhaps into the Internet history, how was the real routing done then) I would be most grateful.
    Thank you a lot!
    Regards,
    Peter

    Hello Mohammed,
    I am afraid we still have not understood each other ;) I am not looking for the algorithms used to select the best path. I am well aware of them, both Ford-Bellman and Dijkstra, and about their internals. By the way, these algorithms do not have any influence whether the routing is classful or classless because they deal with metrics, not with masks. For example, a classless EIGRP internally uses a distance-vector algorithm, not a SPF algorithm.
    I will try to explain once more what is my problem... There are two terms commonly used but badly defined: the classless routing and classful routing. Originally, I have thought that the classful routing works as follows:
    - The routing table consists only of classful destination networks (major nets), metrics and respective gateways. No network masks are stored in the table because we are classful, that is, we use exclusively the route classes and all entries in the routing table are already classful.
    - When routing a packet, the router looks at its destination IP address and determines the major net of this IP address (that is, the classful network that this IP address belongs to). Then it looks up the corresponding entry in the routing table and sends the packet to the respective gateway.
    I thought that the classful routing works in this way. I won't describe the classless routing - both of us know how do the today's routers select the next hop.
    However, in the RFCs 917 and 950 which were published in 1985, long ago before the term 'classless routing' was coined, the network mask was already defined and it was stated how the routers should work with it.
    Now I am confused. The terms classless addresses and classless routing were defined sometime in 1990's, therefore I assume that the routing before the invention of classless IP assignment can be in fact described as classful. In other words, I thought that the routing that was commonly used in 1980's did not use netmasks and can be described as classful because the notion of classlessness came first in 1990's. But now I see that netmasks were defined in 1985.
    Now where am I wrong? Do I understand the classful routing properly as I described it? Is it correct to talk about routing in that era as classful although the netmasks were already in use? Or was it already the classless routing?
    Basically I am trying to understand what was called the classful routing if the classless routing is said to be something different.
    Mohammed, I am most grateful to you for your patience and suggestions! Thank you indeed.
    Regards,
    Peter

  • Differences between SR520 and ASA5505?

    Q: What is the feature parity and differences between SR520 Security Router and ASA5505?
    A: [Addis Hallmark]: The SR520 is a secure router that is made for SBCS deployments. It's interfaces, dynamic routing capabilities, CCA support, etc make it a great fit for many customers. The SR520 is much more commonly compared against 87x platforms. The ASA5505 is a security appliance (and a very good one).
    [Luke Lambert]: Basically in order of capabilities (IMHO):
    UC500 - If you want a basic entry level firewall
    SR520 - If your a small office but want some advanced firewall functions e.g. SSL VPN, DMZ, IPS
    ASA - High performance required, large amount of remote users, advanced features/ monitoring required.
    Reasons for ISR (SR520):- Basic FW
    - One device does it all e.g. Need to terminate ADSL w/ Security in one box.
    Reasons for ASA
    - More advanced firewall
    - Ease of configuration of advanced features
    - Better scaling with VPN (more users)
    - Better SSL (Clientless) VPN

    Good info.
    Richard

  • Differences between MSFC1 and MSFC2 in Catalyst switches

    Hi,
    Want to know the differences between MSFC1 and MSFC2 in Catalyst switches.

    Hi,
    There is not much difference between MSFC1 and MSFC2, the main difference is how the MSFCs send the hardware programming to the PFC. The MSFC1 uses MLS to program the hardware by using the first packet of the traffic. While the MSFC2 uses CEF-based MLS to program the PFC so that the supervisor can make the hardware switching of the packet. NOtice the difference if the MSFC1 needs to see the first packet while the MSFC2, in theory will not need to see a first packet as it uses the CEF routing table to program the PFC2. Now, the kicker, if MSFC2 in sup1A , all this CEF-based MLS is not used since it needs PFC2 to be able to do this. Sup1A does not come with PFC2 only Sup2 comes with PFC2. The MSFCs gives the Cat6K a L3 ability and it's important but the switching performance of the switch depends on the PFC.
    Here is a link on MSFC2 data sheet:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_data_sheet09186a00800887fd.html
    Please rate helpful posts.

  • What is the main difference between BPEL and ESB

    Hi all,
    I am making use ESB in my application .Where the my client application calls ESB and inturn the ESB calls the BPEL process .
    I want to know the differences between BPEL and ESB,I came to know that ESB can do messaging and routing ,where my BPEL process can also do the same thing .
    I came to know form a vendor that ESB is used for connecting to multiple end points ,where as my BPEL process can also do this.
    SO what is main purpose of using ESB ?
    Cheers,
    Kalyan.
    Message was edited by:
    patti

    Hi,
    Look for the blog entry dated 1st october 2007.
    URL:
    http://abhishek-soablog.blogspot.com
    Cheers,
    Abhi...

  • Difference between SIP200 and SIP400

    Hello. 
    Is there anyone who can explain what exactly BIG difference between SIP200 and SIP400 ?
    They have same four bays, support almost same wan interface cards. 
    Please help me : )

    Hi,
    The difference is mainly speed:
    The Cisco 7600 series router is an edge aggregation router, and the SIPs provide a cost-effective solution for customers seeking moderate- to high-port density and line rate services:
    •The Cisco 7600 SIP-200 provides WAN edge aggregation through lower-speed and low-density SPAs for network environments requiring regional office connectivity to headquarters, or collapsed LAN/WAN deployment.
    •The Cisco 7600 SIP-400 provides higher-speed, high-density link aggregation for network environments requiring leased line and metro aggregation.
    •The Cisco 7600 SIP-600 provides a high-speed interface for WANs and metro aggregation.
    link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/module_installation_and_configuration_guides_chapter09186a008044013b.html#wp1063979
    HTH

  • Difference between configurable and non configurable finished goods master

    Hi
    Pl explain the difference between configurable and non configurable finished goods master data.
    Thanks
    kamala

    Hi,
    Configurable material are used when you have a large number of combination of parts that go into a product. It means different combinations of the parts for same material. If you maintain a unique material code for each combination , you require a large number of material numbers. KMAT is used in such a case where you maintain just one generic product code. You assign class to this material having all variant characteristics.
    A super BOM is maintained for such a material consisting of all possible alternatives. A super routing is also maintained consisting of all possible operations that could be used.
    Typically configurable material is used in Made To Order (MTO) environment. However frequently ordered configurations may be planned with a material variant which needs to have a material master record. Thus Material variants may have stock and value. Depending upon characteristic values chosen at sales order entry Sales Order BOM is created. Routing operations are also chosen depending upon which BOM components are assigned to them.
    Non configurable materials are like finish, semi finish materials having fixed BOM.  A separate/single BOM exits for every finish material.
    Revert back for more info.
    thanks and regards,
    Man

  • Difference between u2018Workbenchu2019 and u2018Customizeu2019 Transport request.

    Hi Experts,
    What is the difference between u2018Workbenchu2019 and u2018Customizeu2019 Transport request.
    Thanks

    Workbench Requests
    When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
    Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
    Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
    Customizing requests
    Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
    Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
    Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually

  • Difference between WRV200 and WRV210

    Dear Cisco
    Can you tell me the main difference between WRV200 and WRV210.
    Another question
    The datasheet said that the WRV200 can run SSL VPN, is that rigth???
    Cisco WRV200 Wireless-G VPN Router: RangeBooster
    Downloads
    Cisco WRV200 Wireless-G VPN Router: RangeBooster
    Secure Wireless Network Access for Small Offices
    Highlights
    • IPsec and SSL VPN connectivity on a single device
    • Built-in 4-port 10/100 Fast Ethernet switch
    • Multiple SSIDs and VLANs provide separate secure networks
    • Simple, browser-based configuration
    Figure 1. Cisco WRV200 Wireless-G VPN Router: RangeBooster

    Do WRV200 support SSL. strange if yes a newer product do not
    Highlights
    • IPsec and SSL VPN connectivity on a single device
    • Built-in 4-port 10/100 Fast Ethernet switch
    • Multiple SSIDs and VLANs provide separate secure networks
    • Simple, browser-based configuration

  • Difference between PDS and PPM and which one should be used for SNP /ppds?

    Hi Gurus,
                 Just wanted to know what are the difference between PDS and PPM ?
    1. For what industrial products we use PDS and PPM in SNP and PPDS?
    2. which one can be refered to clients?
    Please let me know it will be really great if anyone let me know the answers
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raj

    Hi Rajkumar,
    I have given below the detailed comparative account of PDS Vs PPM. Please copy and put it in an excel sheet in different columns and then read which is easy to understand.
    PDS
    1. Production Data Structure (PDS) in APO 3.1 & Run Time Object (RTO) in 4.0 and above versions
    2. Master Data Object
    3. Useful for scenarios where the compoenent has got different validity periods
    4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
    5. Contains active Master data from iPPE (Integrated Product and Process Engineering) generated from a production version
    6. PPDS PDS & SNP PDS can be used as master data for planning
    7. Change Management, variant configuration & Phantom assemplies are supported in PDS
    8. Sub-contracting in SNP is fully integrated with R/3 is supported in PDS
    9. Direct transfer of SNP PDS from R/3 is possible
    10.Rapid Planning Matrix can be generated
    11. Not possible to maintain PDS directly in APO and can be used only in combination with R/3
    12. The transfer of data changes is simpler
    13. Not possible to create alternate SNP-PDS in std system for different mode combinations
    14. PDS can be automatically generated from two sources ie R/3 and iPPE
    PPM:-
    1. Production Process Model
    2. Master Data Object
    3. Cannot be used for scenarios where the component has got different validity period
    4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
    5. Contains active Master data generated from the combination of routing (BoM & receipe) and production versions
    6. PPDS PPM & SNP PPM's can be used as master data for planning
    7. Not supported by PPM
    8. Not supported by PPM
    9. Not possible here. SNP PPMs will be generated via PPDS PPMs
    10. Not possible
    11. PPMs can be directly created in APO and can be modified without R/3 also.
    12. Little Complex when compared to PDS
    13. Alternate SNP-PPMs can be easily created
    14. PPM can be generated automatically generated only from R/3
    PDS is used in industries wherein there are multiple components or assemblies having diffeent production versions whose validity periods are different.  PPM is being used typically in process industries, chemical industries.  PPM is very simple in its usage and very flexible in operations in terms of modifications at APO level and can be referred to client depending on the business requirement
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • What is exact difference between PPM and PDS

    Hi,
    can any one prove details of Difference between PPM and PDS
    Thanks
    suresh

    Dear Suresh,
    please find below the detailed comparative account of PDS Vs PPM. You can copy and put it in an excel sheet in different columns and then read which is easy to understand.
    PDS:
    1. Production Data Structure (PDS) in APO 3.1 & Run Time Object (RTO) in 4.0 and above versions
    2. Master Data Object
    3. Useful for scenarios where the compoenent has got different validity periods
    4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
    5. Contains active Master data from iPPE (Integrated Product and Process Engineering) generated from a production version
    6. PPDS PDS & SNP PDS can be used as master data for planning
    7. Change Management, variant configuration & Phantom assemplies are supported in PDS
    8. Sub-contracting in SNP is fully integrated with R/3 is supported in PDS
    9. Direct transfer of SNP PDS from R/3 is possible
    10.Rapid Planning Matrix can be generated
    11. Not possible to maintain PDS directly in APO and can be used only in combination with R/3
    12. The transfer of data changes is simpler
    13. Not possible to create alternate SNP-PDS in std system for different mode combinations
    14. PDS can be automatically generated from two sources ie R/3 and iPPE
    PPM:
    1. Production Process Model
    2. Master Data Object
    3. Cannot be used for scenarios where the component has got different validity period
    4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
    5. Contains active Master data generated from the combination of routing (BoM & receipe) and production versions
    6. PPDS PPM & SNP PPM's can be used as master data for planning
    7. Not supported by PPM
    8. Not supported by PPM
    9. Not possible here. SNP PPMs will be generated via PPDS PPMs
    10. Not possible
    11. PPMs can be directly created in APO and can be modified without R/3 also.
    12. Little Complex when compared to PDS
    13. Alternate SNP-PPMs can be easily created
    14. PPM can be generated automatically generated only from R/3

  • What is the difference between express and extreme?

    I am wondering what is the difference between express and extreme and will there be any effect in performance if I am just using it at home?

    I am just looking for router that gives me reliable highspeed wi-fi for personal use within my home.
    Wireless performance is roughly equal between the two devices, with a slight edge to the Extreme since it uses a bit better antenna package.
    If I connect the the hard drive to the extreme, does that mean I can back up all my data wirelessly through the port into my external hard drive?
    Yes, if you backup manually, or use an application like Carbon Copy Cloner or SuperDuper. 
    No, if you were planning to use Apple's Time Machine application since Time Machine backups to a hard drive at the USB port of the AirPort Extreme are not officially supported by Apple.

  • 294.What is the difference between TCP and UDP

    What is the difference between TCP and UDP

    The difference between TCP and UDP is that UDP throws datagram packets over the wire not concerned whether it arrives at its destination or not. TCP attempts to facilitate the notion of a connection by requiring an acknowledgement by the recipient and continually resending the packets until it receives the acknowledgement or gets a timeout. In a way TCP can be thought of as a layer over UDP but it's more than that. A good analogy is the beginning of the school day vs the end of the school day. In the beginning children enter school in a line and in an orderly fashion. Each child is accounted for. Each child has a defined classroom destination. Likewise TCP packets are sequenced, accounted for, and have a certain destination. At the end of the day all the kids pour out of the building randomly with no regard of whether their buddies are on detention or not. Any particular kid could be heading straight home or to the mall and no accounting is taken. In the same way UPD packets are dispersed from the sender without regard for order. Any packet to make a pit stop at a particular router on the network and no accounting is done to ensure it makes it all the way to the recipient.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Won't charge

    My first piece of Apple technology! Not making a very good impression so far. I've read the discussion boards and the troubleshooting FAQs. Sure are a lot of design problems, and a heck of a lot of things to do before giving up and getting it repaire

  • What do I loose with "Reduce File Size" to Acrobat 8.0 compatability?

    When scanning documents using the Acrobat interface in 9.0, I find that the file sizes are very large...about 1.5MB per page. If I then select the "reduce File Size" option from the Document tab, and select Acrobat 8.0 and later compatibility, the fi

  • How to know if a specific profileId is written in DB

    Hi all, The checkout of my store supports an order without a persistent profile. After the successful purchase, the profile is persisted in the DB through createItem and addItem... How can I check if this specific profile was already persisted in DB?

  • Which Raw plug-in using Nikon D7000 and Photoshop Elements 7 for importing NEF files?

    Cannot import NEF files from Nikon D7000. Which Raw plug-in is avalible for Adobe Photoshop Elements 7? According to Help sites version 6.3 is needed, But is it kompatible with Elements /?? Please help!

  • Update 10.1.9 broke my Acrobat 10 (Mac) - Boo!

    I normally install all updates, both Apple and Adobe. I'm still on OS 10.8.5 (ML). Acrobat update 10.1.9 broke my Acrobat X Pro. Here's what no longer works: Save As --> Reduced File Size - freezes, never completes - This is critical for the work I d