Difference between HRHAP00_TMPL_608 and HRHAP00_TMPL_GETLIST badis in OSA

Hello,
1. Can anyone tell me the difference between the following two BADIs in Objective settings & Appraisals
HRHAP00_TMPL_608
HRHAP00_TMPL_GETLIST
2. Actually we have created a custom implementation of HRHAP00_TMPL_GETLIST. It is working fine in restricting the templates in portal.
But when I try PHAP_ADMIN_PA / PHAP_CHANGE_PA in gui, it is throwing an error "This template XXXX is not assigned to the add-on application. Any reason?
Thank You & Regards
Raghu Kolukuluri

Hi
About the 2nd point, maybe you should look at the tables VC_T77HAP_CATEGORY and VC_T77HAP_CAT_GROUP from tcode SM34.
I am not sure about the cause of this problem, but my guess is that it may be arising due to the incorrect linking between categories and category groups.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Vikas Bhatia

Similar Messages

  • Difference between BAPI and BADI

    Hi,
    Can anyone explain the difference between BAPI and BADI?

    Hi Naveen,
    BAPI - It is nothing, but a FM which is used to load the data into SAP system. The data may be from the Legacy system.
    BADI - They are the enhancement which can be applied to the standard SAP program as per the business requirement. BADI are the newer version of user exits which uses ABAP OOPs concept.
    Revert back if you have further query.
    Reward points if useful.
    Regards,
    Atish

  • What is the main difference between Enhancements and BADI.?

    What is the main difference between Enhancements and BADI.?plzz tell
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 13, 2008 3:48 PM

    CMOD is the Project Management of SAP Enhancements (i.e., SMOD Enhancements). SMOD contains the actual enhancements and CMOD is the grouping of those SMOD enhancements.
    Difference Between BADI and User Exits
    BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
    Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
    BADI's are oops based.
    Business Add-Ins are a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects. They can be inserted into the SAP System to accommodate user requirements too specific to be included in the standard delivery. Since specific industries often require special functions, SAP allows you to predefine these points in your software. 
    As with customer exits two different views are available:
    In the definition view, an application programmer predefines exit points in a source that allow specific industry sectors, partners, and customers to attach additional software to standard SAP source code without having to modify the original object. 
    In the implementation view, the users of Business Add-Ins can customize the logic they need or use a standard logic if one is available.
    In contrast to customer exits, Business Add-Ins no longer assume a two-level infrastructure (SAP and customer solutions), but instead allow for a multi-level system landscape (SAP, partner, and customer solutions, as well as country versions, industry solutions, and the like). Definitions and implementations of Business Add-Ins can be created at each level within such a system infrastructure.
    SAP guarantees the upward compatibility of all Business Add-In interfaces. Release upgrades do not affect enhancement calls from within the standard software nor do they affect the validity of call interfaces. You do not have to register Business Add-Ins in SSCR.
    The Business Add-In enhancement technique differentiates between enhancements that can only be implemented once and enhancements that can be used actively by any number of customers at the same time. In addition, Business Add-Ins can be defined according to filter values. This allows you to control add-in implementation and make it dependent on specific criteria (on a specific Country value, for example).
    All ABAP sources, screens, GUIs, and table interfaces created using this enhancement technique are defined in a manner that allows customers to include their own enhancements in the standard. A single Business Add-In contains all of the interfaces necessary to implement a specific task.
    The actual program code is enhanced using ABAP Objects. In order to better understand the programming techniques behind the Business Add-In enhancement concept, SAP recommends reading the section on ABAP Objects.

  • What is the difference between ABAP and BADI

    What is the difference between ABAP and BADI

    Hi
    BAPI is different from BADIs and User exits in ABAP
    BAPI : BAPI basically works like a function module. the major difference being that it can work like a RFC. That means it can work from system to system. Mostly the name of a BAPI can be seen in se37 by just giving BAPI_* F4 and you will see a lot of BAPIS.
    BADI : BADI is a new concept and are also known as Business Addins. SE18 and SE19 are the two transactions which are used to make a BADI. Mostly BADIS are not made but selected from what is given in SAP. These are similar to user-exits but are method based. One can say it is an extension to the user exits. If one has an issue in which one has to change so existing things in SAP then BADI can be used. First one has to define it and then find out a suitable implementation for the issue concerned
    User-exits : there are many types of user exits like Function exits , Menu Exits Screen exits etc. These are used when there is an issue of changing SAP given screen or menu or report.. Main transactions which are used in these cases is CMOD and SMOD. One can find out the user exit concerned and change it accordingly as per ones requirement
    to be more specific in answering in singel phrase
    1.user-exit and badi are related.
    2. But BAPI is something entirely different.
    3. user-exit and badi.
    BADI is nothing but user-exit,
    BUT CLASS/OO based. thats all.
    4. BAPI is nothing but a FUNCTION MODULE only,but its RFC Enabled.
    Santosh

  • What is badi?difference between bapi and badi?

    what is badi?difference between bapi and badi?

    Hi..
    BADI is just an object-oriented version of user-exit. Instead of entering program code into some function module (as in customer-exit), you define some class which has to implement predefined methods and those methods are fired at predefined points just like an old user-exit. Some BADI can have multiple independent implementations which is much better for software deployment as several developers can implement the same BADI independently.
    To understand BAPIs, you must know that there are 2 things. One is the SAP Object Repository of the Business Object Repository (BOR) and the Function Builder.
    Now the business objects with their business processes and business data, reside in the BOR, with the corresponding BAPI. the implementation of this BAPI resides in the function builder. Any external world (non SAP) programs or legacy systems can access the business processes or data of any business object in the BOR, thru the process of invoking the BAPI implementation of the BAPI for this business object.
    Thus we can access a business object.
    So we can say that a BAPI is a process that allows third party s/w or non SAP programs to access SAP Business object data and processes.
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Regards
    - Rishika
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jun 12, 2008 5:33 PM

  • Difference between Userexit and BADI

    can any one explains about the difference between Userexit and BADI and BAPI & BADI..
    how to process Error Codes in ALE?

    BADI is just an object-oriented version of user-exit. Instead of entering program code into some function module (as in customer-exit), you define some class which has to implement predefined methods and those methods are fired at predefined points just like an old user-exit. Some BADI can have multiple independent implementations which is much better for software deployment as several developers can implement the same BADI independently.
    <b>BADI is technology of user exit? and BAPI is technology of aplication interface.
    U can use BAPIs for create a material, for example.</b>
    <b>Difference Between BADI and User Exits</b>
    Business Add-Ins are a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects. They can be inserted into the SAP System to accommodate user requirements too specific to be included in the standard delivery. Since specific industries often require special functions, SAP allows you to predefine these points in your software.
    As with customer exits two different views are available:
    In the definition view, an application programmer predefines exit points in a source that allow specific industry sectors, partners, and customers to attach additional software to standard SAP source code without having to modify the original object.
    In the implementation view, the users of Business Add-Ins can customize the logic they need or use a standard logic if one is available.
    In contrast to customer exits, Business Add-Ins no longer assume a two-level infrastructure (SAP and customer solutions), but instead allow for a multi-level system landscape (SAP, partner, and customer solutions, as well as country versions, industry solutions, and the like). Definitions and implementations of Business Add-Ins can be created at each level within such a system infrastructure.
    SAP guarantees the upward compatibility of all Business Add-In interfaces. Release upgrades do not affect enhancement calls from within the standard software nor do they affect the validity of call interfaces. You do not have to register Business Add-Ins in SSCR.
    The Business Add-In enhancement technique differentiates between enhancements that can only be implemented once and enhancements that can be used actively by any number of customers at the same time. In addition, Business Add-Ins can be defined according to filter values. This allows you to control add-in implementation and make it dependent on specific criteria (on a specific Country value, for example).
    All ABAP sources, screens, GUIs, and table interfaces created using this enhancement technique are defined in a manner that allows customers to include their own enhancements in the standard. A single Business Add-In contains all of the interfaces necessary to implement a specific task.
    The actual program code is enhanced using ABAP Objects. In order to better understand the programming techniques behind the Business Add-In enhancement concept, SAP recommends reading the section on ABAP Objects.
    Regards,
    Pavan

  • Difference between Userexits and BADI

    Pls give me the Difference between Userexits and BADI.

    Hi,
    hope this is helpful
    Difference Between BADI and User Exits
    Business Add-Ins are a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects. They can be inserted into the SAP System to accommodate user requirements too specific to be included in the standard delivery. Since specific industries often require special functions, SAP allows you to predefine these points in your software. 
    As with customer exits two different views are available:
    In the definition view, an application programmer predefines exit points in a source that allow specific industry sectors, partners, and customers to attach additional software to standard SAP source code without having to modify the original object. 
    In the implementation view, the users of Business Add-Ins can customize the logic they need or use a standard logic if one is available.
    In contrast to customer exits, Business Add-Ins no longer assume a two-level infrastructure (SAP and customer solutions), but instead allow for a multi-level system landscape (SAP, partner, and customer solutions, as well as country versions, industry solutions, and the like). Definitions and implementations of Business Add-Ins can be created at each level within such a system infrastructure.
    SAP guarantees the upward compatibility of all Business Add-In interfaces. Release upgrades do not affect enhancement calls from within the standard software nor do they affect the validity of call interfaces. You do not have to register Business Add-Ins in SSCR.
    The Business Add-In enhancement technique differentiates between enhancements that can only be implemented once and enhancements that can be used actively by any number of customers at the same time. In addition, Business Add-Ins can be defined according to filter values. This allows you to control add-in implementation and make it dependent on specific criteria (on a specific Country value, for example).
    All ABAP sources, screens, GUIs, and table interfaces created using this enhancement technique are defined in a manner that allows customers to include their own enhancements in the standard. A single Business Add-In contains all of the interfaces necessary to implement a specific task.
    The actual program code is enhanced using ABAP Objects. In order to better understand the programming techniques behind the Business Add-In enhancement concept, SAP recommends reading the section on ABAP Objects.
    What is difference between badi and user-exists?
    What is difference between enhancements and user-exists? and what is the full form of BADI?
    I have another doubt in BDC IN BDC WE HAVE MSEGCALL (i did not remember the > correct name) where the error logs are stored, MSEGCALL is a table or structure.
    What is the system landscape?
    1) Difference between BADI and USER-EXIT.
        i) BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
           Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
        ii) BADI's are oops based.
    2) About 'BDCMSGCOLL' it is a structure.  Used for finding error records.
    3) Full form of BADI 'Business addins'.
    3) System land scape will be depends on your project 
        Ex:- 'Development server'>'Quality server'-> 'Production server'......

  • N97 bad music player, difference between v20 and v...

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me the changes of the music player made in firmware version 21.0.045 compared to version 20.0.019?
    All the changes logs I can find say “music player improvements” but I can't find any.
    The difference between v20 and the version before that ware obvious.
    “Improvements” like the “back” button going back to the home screen instead of the music list you ware coming from.
    The removal of the search function in portrait mode, you can only search songs with the hardware keyboard, so no portrait touchscreen keyboard search. (very annoying when using a car dashboard stand).
    And they ruined the search function all together. Now I can only search on the first word of a song, album or artiste. First I was able to search just a (part of a)word and all songs containing that word in the title would be found. I have almost 1500 songs on my N97 with only 1/3 of 32GB used. How can the expect me to remember all first words of about 4500 songs!
    And all the album art in the lists, which makes for less songs on the screen at once. I don't like that very much, but that's just me I guess.
    So overall the made an oké music player into an annoying player ware bey I have to remember way to much to use it properly
    Of course I hoped that v21 would bring some positive chances to the music player, but I cant find any. Can Anyone tell me the changes, if any. Or are they all under the hood? But I haven't noticed any performance boosts either.
    Hope to hear from someone.

    I do not think that N97's music player  is going to be fixed in any way...
    Why? Because N97 is the worst device Nokia has ever produced! They will stop N97 software upgrading   because  many things in this phone went wrong. Now they claim they can fix it. And I claim: no, they can not. If they could save the sinking ship of N97 we would wait for so long for the solution of the problem called N97.
    Look how irresponsible N97 becomes when you start music player!
    Is this CPU issue? Playing mp3 file with 400 MHz cpu is very big deal!
    My E71 has never stopped responding, and what I dit with E71 was multitasking torture!

  • Differences between mcp and mcp t sound

    this is all sound sound info direct from a man at nvidia who knows
    PLEASE NOTE ONLY MCP2-T BOARD MSI DO AT THE MOMMENT IS THE K7N2G-ILSR
    The MCP has no hardware support for audio of any kind, period. Windows and the CPU do all the audio work on that part and there is absolutely no DSP, NVIDIA or otherwise, in that chip to help out. Try to do EAX, any kind of reverb or chorus, or a music preset on those boards and you'll see the CPU usage climb. Ditto if you add more voices to the mix: CPU usage goes up.
    The MCP-T has a full hardware audio DSP, hardware acceleration for 2D and 3D streams, and Dolby Digital encode support. EQs, HRTFs, and all environmental settings are exposed and modifiable by the user. None of this is available on the soft solutions due to the heavy hit on the CPU if they were enabled.
    Short of that, you can try to use the ASIO or OpenAL drivers. You'll find that neither will work on the MCP because there is no supporting hardware for them. In short, there is no way to coax an MCP to be an APU capable part, the support simply isn't in the chip
    Here's the chip differences:
    MCP has the following:
    - ATA-133 x 2 ports
    - USB 1.0/1.1/2.0 x 6 ports
    - NVIDIA MAC 10/100 x 1 port
    - Legacy I/O bus (PS2, Printer, Serial)
    - AC 97 host based audio (no DSP)
    MCP-T includes the above and adds the following:
    - 3Com MAC 10/100 x 1 port
    - 1394A Firewire MAC x 3 ports
    - NVIDIA APU with Dolby Digtal Encoder

    thats not to say mcp is bad as this proves
    The MCP2 is definately hardware sound. As far as the APU goes the only difference between MCP2 and MCP2-T is the T version has Soundstorm(Dolby Digital). Basically Mcp2-T =5.1 digital output capabilities Mcp2 no digital output, analogue output only. The other differences are the T version Has Dual Lan support and a firewire controller which the plain MCP2 does not. Here are my cpu utilization test results from Audio winbench proving that The MCP2 APU is a hardware APU.
    http://www.nforcershq.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28870#28870
    to see the test he ran ,will not copy /paste
    MSI K7N2-L Mainboard
    Athlon XP 2000+ Retail cooler
    MSI Geforce3 TI 200
    1Gig (2x512) Kingston pc2700 Ram
    Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 8meg cache 80 gig
    WD 600BB 60 gig
    Onboard Nforce 2 APU (no soundstorm
    just to explain differences

  • Difference between transparent and replicated partitions

    whats the difference between transparent and replicated partitions in EAL. currently we have created essbase cube via transparent partition in eal. performance of obiee reports on essbase cube is very bad. now somebody suggested to create essbase cube via replicated partition in EAL. what difference would it make. one guy said replicated partition would make it more slow. i am confused. please explain.

    Transparent Partition does not occupy or create extra memory Space in the Destination Application , it just shows the Data from Source to the Destination cube . This partition is completely dependent on Existence of Source Data . While , in replicated Partition you can use a copy of source data in the Destination cube.
    FYI : Hyperion Essbase 11.1.1.0 &amp;#8211; Partitioning and its use cases &amp;#8211; Transparent, Replicated and Linked part…

  • What is the difference between action and workflow? How do I decide that I need an action in a transaction and not a workflow and vice versa?

    Dear Experts,
    I have few doubts and request your expert inputs to clarify my doubts.
    What is the difference between action and workflow? How do I decide that I need an action in a transaction and not a workflow and vice versa?
    Your earliest response is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    SMTP

    Hi SMTP,
    First of all, as I mentioned action is nothing but an executable work item which is designed in the workflow itself. In other words, Workflow is like your OOPS class. At run time, workflow instances are created just like objects of classes. Now, the steps designed in the workflow are called TASKS and the instances of tasks are called WORKITEMS. Now, the work items where any user action is required are called executable work items. ANd the work items where no user action is required (for example, sending an email in background) are called non-executable work items.
    Whether to go with development of workflow or not depends upon your business scenario. If your requirement is only to send an email and you find any BAdi or exit where in you can write your logic then there is no need of creating a workflow. If there is a defined business process with defined users and time lines, then you can go with the development of workflows.
    Rest, the below link will help you in understanding basic concepts of workflow :
    Why use SAP Workflow? | Insight Consulting Partners
    Regards,
    Richa

  • What is the fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?

    Hello to all,
    After reading several RFCs, guides and HOWTOs I am confused by an apparently trivial question - what is the basic, fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?
    I am well aware that - said in a very primitive way - the classful routing does not make use of netmasks and instead uses the address classes while the classless routing utilizes the netmasks and does not evaluate the address classes.
    However, already in 1985 the RFC 950 (Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure) stated that the networks can be further subnetted using the network mask. Since then the routers are expected to use network masks in the routing decision process in the precise way they use it nowadays. However, if the routers use network masks they are doing the classless routing, aren't they? Where is then the difference if we used to describe the 80's way of routing as a classful routing? Or was it already the classless routing? The RFCs about CIDR came gradually only in 1992 and 1993.
    If somebody could give me an insight into the key difference between classful and classless routing (and perhaps into the Internet history, how was the real routing done then) I would be most grateful.
    Thank you a lot!
    Regards,
    Peter

    Hello Mohammed,
    I am afraid we still have not understood each other ;) I am not looking for the algorithms used to select the best path. I am well aware of them, both Ford-Bellman and Dijkstra, and about their internals. By the way, these algorithms do not have any influence whether the routing is classful or classless because they deal with metrics, not with masks. For example, a classless EIGRP internally uses a distance-vector algorithm, not a SPF algorithm.
    I will try to explain once more what is my problem... There are two terms commonly used but badly defined: the classless routing and classful routing. Originally, I have thought that the classful routing works as follows:
    - The routing table consists only of classful destination networks (major nets), metrics and respective gateways. No network masks are stored in the table because we are classful, that is, we use exclusively the route classes and all entries in the routing table are already classful.
    - When routing a packet, the router looks at its destination IP address and determines the major net of this IP address (that is, the classful network that this IP address belongs to). Then it looks up the corresponding entry in the routing table and sends the packet to the respective gateway.
    I thought that the classful routing works in this way. I won't describe the classless routing - both of us know how do the today's routers select the next hop.
    However, in the RFCs 917 and 950 which were published in 1985, long ago before the term 'classless routing' was coined, the network mask was already defined and it was stated how the routers should work with it.
    Now I am confused. The terms classless addresses and classless routing were defined sometime in 1990's, therefore I assume that the routing before the invention of classless IP assignment can be in fact described as classful. In other words, I thought that the routing that was commonly used in 1980's did not use netmasks and can be described as classful because the notion of classlessness came first in 1990's. But now I see that netmasks were defined in 1985.
    Now where am I wrong? Do I understand the classful routing properly as I described it? Is it correct to talk about routing in that era as classful although the netmasks were already in use? Or was it already the classless routing?
    Basically I am trying to understand what was called the classful routing if the classless routing is said to be something different.
    Mohammed, I am most grateful to you for your patience and suggestions! Thank you indeed.
    Regards,
    Peter

  • What is the difference between form6i and form10g

    Respected Guru's,
    I actually want to know the difference between form6i and form 10g.
    Is it bad or good to work on form 6i as compare to form 10g.
    plez help me.

    The biggest difference is between 6i and 10g is that 6i is client-server and 10g is Webforms(although you can run 6i forms as web).
    It's always best to use the latest version: new features, solved bugs and of course support wise.

  • Difference between collect and move stmts

    hi
    anyone plz explain...
    1. Difference between collect and move stmts
    2. Badi and user exit.
    gowri

    Hi,
    1.COLLECT:COLLECT is used to create unique or compressed datsets. The key fields are the default key fields of the internal table itab .
    If you use only COLLECT to fill an internal table, COLLECT makes sure that the internal table does not contain two entries with the same default key fields.
    If, besides its default key fields, the internal table contains number fields,the contents of these number fields are added together if the internal table already contains an entry with the same key fields.
    If the default key of an internal table processed with COLLECT is blank, all the values are added up in the first table line.
    If you specify wa INTO , the entry to be processed is taken from the explicitly specified work area wa . If not, it comes from the header line of the internal table itab .
    After COLLECT , the system field SY-TABIX contains the index of the - existing or new - table entry with default key fields which match those of the entry to be processed.
    COLLECT can create unique or compressed datasets and should be used precisely for this purpose. If uniqueness or compression are unimportant, or two values with identical default key field values could not possibly occur in your particular task, you should use APPEND instead. However, for a unique or compressed dataset which is also efficient, COLLECT is the statement to use.
    If you process a table with COLLECT , you should also use COLLECT to fill it. Only by doing this can you guarantee that the internal table will actually be unique or compressed, as described above and COLLECT will run very efficiently.
    If you use COLLECT with an explicitly specified work area, it must be compatible with the line type of the internal table.
    In 'move' the actually data copies into another data field
    2.
    Difference between BADI and USER-EXIT.
    i) BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
    Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
    ii) BADI's are oops based.
    A. BAdI Definition
    1. SE18
    2. Enter the name for the BAdI to be created in customer namespace and press "Create".
    3. Enter a definition for your BAdI and on the interface tab enter a name for the BAdI interface. SAP proposes a name and it is pretty good. Meanwhile a BAdI class is also created which is not in our concern.
    e.g for "ZTEST", SAP proposes "ZIF_EX_TEST" for the interface and "ZCL_EX_TEST" for the class.
    4. Save your BAdI.
    5. Double-click on the interface name. It will pass to a Class Builder session to make you implement your interface. If you are not familiar to the Class Builder; it's a bit like Function Builder and it will be easy to discover its procedure.
    6. Save and activate your interface.
    B. Calling your BAdI from an application program
    1. Declare a reference variable with reference to the Business Add-In interface.
    e.g. DATA exit_ref TYPE REF TO zif_ex_test.
    2. Call the static method GET_INSTANCE of the service class CL_EXITHANDLER. This returns an instance of the required object.
    e.g.
    CALL METHOD CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE
    CHANGING instance = exit_ref .
    3. After those two steps, you can now call all of the methods of the BAdI where it is required in your program. Make sure you specify the method interfaces correctly.
    C. BAdI Implementations
    1. SE19
    2. Enter the name for the BAdI implementation to be created in customer namespace and press "Create".
    3. It will request the BAdI definition name to which this implementation will be tied.
    4. Enter a definition for your implementation and on the interface tab enter a name for the implementing class. Again SAP proposes a name and it is pretty good.
    e.g for "ZIMPTEST", SAP proposes "ZCL_IM_IMPTEST".
    5. Save your implementation.
    6. To implement a method, just double-click on the method name and you will be taken to the Class Builder to write the code for it. Here you redefine the BAdI interface methods.
    7. You must activate your implementation to make it executable. You can only activate or deactivate an implementation in its original system without modification. The activation or deactivation must be transported into subsequent systems
    Regards

  • Difference between 32 and 64 and why is 64 your preference

    Hi, can someone please explain the difference between 32 and 64 bit and why the 64 is a preference for some of you? I'm more concerned about peripherals and printers working with Vista Ultimate on 64bit, before purchasing and installing CS4 onto a new computer. Thank you.

    Bear in mind that to run 64 bit you need (a) a computer able to do
    this and (b) the 64-bit edition of Vista (not the normal one).
    Good things:
    * Can run 64-bit programs that use more than 2 GB (Photoshop CS4 will
    be one of these).
    * Can use more than 3 to 3.5 GB of RAM in total
    * Each program can use up to 2 GB (if available)
    * The excess is available for cacheing disk
    Bad things
    * Driver and software availability needs checking. Little things may
    not work (e.g. in Acrobat, PDF preview in icons). Or big things.
    * 64-bit applications will need 64-bit plug-ins
    * Less mainstream, overall support may be more limited if things don't
    work.
    * 64-bit programs are a little larger and use a little more RAM than
    their 32-bit equivalents.
    Myths
    * "64 bit programs will go faster than 32 bit programs". Myth, unless
    the program can make use of more than 2 GB of RAM.
    * "All programs will go faster in 64 bit Windows". Myth, unless the
    extra memory you can use reduces the amount of disk operation.
    Aandi Inston

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using PostgreSQL through a DB Link connection

    Hi, I'm trying to connect to PostgreSQL using a DB Link connection but when retrieving the users in the Discoverer Administrator after selecting the Database Link I got the following error: Database Error - ORA - 00904: "USERNAME" invalid identifier.

  • Acrobat 7 Pro & Office 2003

    My end-user is receiving an error when attempting to create a PDF using the Acrobat 7.0 plug-in within Office 2003 running on Windows XP SP2. (note: Distiller 7.0 works without problems.) The error message received is: "The Acrobat PDFMaker Server co

  • Problems with PL/SQL

    Hi, I know that there are much threads for PL/SQL, but I nowhere found an explanation for my problem ... sorry I have a LOV with years (2002, 2003, 2004, ...). The display value is a number, the return value is an varchar2. If nothing is selected 0 i

  • Is there a device that my mom can use to plug in her iphone to the bose wave soundsystem and play music?

    Is there a device that can be used to plug in an iphone 4 to a bose wave sound system and play music?

  • 1.2 for OSX even worse than 1.1

    What's wrong with 1.2? I've just installed this on OSX and it's showing the wrong tables in my schemas, including an entry <null> as a table. In one schema it's showing no tables at all, yet I know there are about 30 tables... I reverted to 1.1 (tryi