Difference between Intel Core Duo and Intel Core 2 Duo

I bought my MBP in November of last year, before the update on the Pros. However, it says about the new Pros that they have Intel Core 2 Duo processors, which are faster than the Intel Core Duos of previous MBPs. I know I bought mine before they updated them, but my "About This Mac" says that mine has an Intel Core 2 Duo processor. So, did they update the processors before this latest update, or do have one of the new Macbooks somehow, or what happened? And, is there any difference between my 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, and a 2.4 GHz Intel Core Duo?

Only the original Intel machines came with Core Duo processors. The principal difference is that Core Duos are 32-bit and Core 2 Duos are 64-bit processors. There were also increases in available clock speed, L2 cache, and frontside bus speed. The first models only addressed 2 GBs of RAM. Later models had a different memory controller that enabled 3 GBs of user accessible RAM (4 GBs installed) and even later models such as yours had a memory controller that enabled accessing 4 GBs of RAM (4 GBs installed.)
The first Intel Minis came with a Core Solo processor which had only one core instead of two.

Similar Messages

  • Question: I want to update to the new LION OSX, but it says that I need to at least have an Intel Core 2 Duo. When I click "about this Mac," it says that I have a 2.16 Intel Core Duo. Is there a difference between the "Core 2 Duo" and the "Core Duo"?

    Well, my title basically asks the question that I am seeking an answer for. Im not sure what year my MB Pro is, and I cant exactly find it on the Apple site. Its a 2.16 Intel Core Duo, 2 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM. All I see (dating back to 2007,) is Intel Core 2 Duo on the apple site. Im pretty sure (but not 100% positive,) that my MB Pro is a late 2008/early 2009. Just trying to figure out if I can install LION OSX or not, since it requires atleast intel core 2 duo, and mine says I only have the intel core duo. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

    Core Duo is 32 bit processor and Core 2 Duo is 64 bit processor
    OS X Lion, will only on 64 bit Intel processor Mac's.
    The following Mac's that have 32 bit Intel “Yonah” processorsthat won't run OS X Lion.
    iMac 4,1 Early (Jan-Sept) 2006 17"
    iMac 4,1 Early (Jan-Sept) 2006 20"
    iMac 4,2 Mid (July-Sept) 2006 17"
    Mac Mini 1,1 (Feb-Sept) Early 2006
    Mac Mini 1,1 (Sept-Aug) Late 2006
    MacBook 1,1 13" (May-Nov 2006)
    MacBook Pro 1,1 15" A1150 (Jan-May 2006)
    MacBook Pro 1,2 17" A1151 (Aprl-Oct 2006)
    MacBook Pro 1,1 15" A1175 (May-Oct 2006)
    There is a difference between “Intel Core Duo” and “IntelCore 2 Duo” processors.
    Look under your Apple menu > About this Mac > more information for the details

  • HSRP between 2 access switches and 2 core switches

    Hi I am looking for running HSRP between 2 access switches and 2 core switches for client PC and Server network’s next-hop redundancy as per attached setup.
    As you can see I have used one /29 network for connecting CORE & ACCESS switches & configure Interface VLAN10 (Layer 3 SVI) with shown IPs and standby IP (VIP).G0/1 on Access Switches & G2/1 on Core Switches are access ports for VLAN10.
    There is a L2 Trunk interconnecting Core-Main/Backup & as well as Access-Main/Backup Switches allowing VLAN10 to allow VLAN10’s HSRP packets to pass through (apart from other HSRP instances).
    Below are the HRSP & Trunk configuration on Core and Access Switches please have a look and suggest if they are correct in term of HSRP implementation, as I can see on both side HSRP master & standby status are fine as desired, but I can’t ping VIP of ACCESS Switch from CORE switch, but the VIP of CORE switch I can ping from ACCESS switch.
    Access-Main
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-01 PORT G2/1***
     switchport access vlan 10
     switchport mode access
     load-interval 30
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-01 & AC-SW-02 for HRSP***
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,40
     switchport mode trunk
     load-interval 30
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-01 PORT G2/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.1 255.255.255.248
     standby 1 ip 10.10.11.2
     standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 1 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 1 authentication accvlan10
    Access-Backup
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-02 PORT G2/1***
     switchport access vlan 10
     switchport mode access
     load-interval 30
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-01 & AC-SW-02 for HRSP***
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,40
     switchport mode trunk
     load-interval 30
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-02 PORT G2/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.3 255.255.255.248
     standby 1 ip 10.10.11.2
     standby 1 priority 10
     standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 1 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 1 authentication accvlan10
    Core-Main
    interface GigabitEthernet2/1
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-01 PORT G0/1***
     switchport access vlan 10
     switchport mode access
     load-interval 30
    interface GigabitEthernet2/2
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-01 & CR-SW-02 for HRSP***
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20
     switchport mode trunk
     load-interval 30
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-01 PORT G0/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.4 255.255.255.248
     standby 1 ip 10.10.11.5
     standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 1 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 1 authentication crvlan10
    Core-Backup
    interface GigabitEthernet2/1
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-02 PORT G0/1***
     switchport access vlan 10
     switchport mode access
     load-interval 30
    interface GigabitEthernet2/2
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-01 & CR-SW-02 for HRSP***
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20
     switchport mode trunk
     load-interval 30
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-02 PORT G0/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.6 255.255.255.248
     standby 1 ip 10.10.11.5
     standby 1 priority 10
     standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 1 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 1 authentication crvlan10

    Hi Rick thanks once again, so I am assuming I should use to configure as below and still one /29 subnet I can use to connect these Switches with the above static routings.
    Access Switch-Main
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-01 PORT G2/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.1 255.255.255.248
     standby 2 ip 10.10.11.2
     standby 2 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 2 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 2 authentication accvlan10
    ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.11.5
    Access Switch-Backup
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to CR-SW-02 PORT G2/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.3 255.255.255.248
     standby 2 ip 10.10.11.2
     standby 2 priority 10
     standby 2 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 2 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 2 authentication accvlan10
    ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.11.5
    Core Switch -Main
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-01 PORT G0/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.4 255.255.255.248
     standby 1 ip 10.10.11.5
     standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 1 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 1 authentication crvlan10
    ip route 192.168.40.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.11.2
    Core Switch -Backup
    interface Vlan10
     description ***Connected to AC-SW-02 PORT G0/1***
     ip address 10.10.11.6 255.255.255.248
     standby 1 ip 10.10.11.5
     standby 1 priority 10
     standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
     standby 1 preempt delay minimum 180
     standby 1 authentication crvlan10
    ip route 192.168.40.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.11.2

  • Any real difference between a 1.83 and 2.0 MacBook Pro?

    Hi all,
    I have recently bought a MacBook Pro 1.83 GHz model. It was on sale at my local computer store and I thought it was a good find, as it was brand new and was selling for £1099, a £300 saving on the 2.0 GHz model. Before I start using it, I just wanted to know if anyone knew if there was a real performance difference between the two and should I have paid the extra £300 to get the 2.0 GHz machine?
    I only ask this, as I know that over time Apple sometimes tweak the machine to improve it and (after talking with someone at Apple), I've been told that there have been 5 or 6 changes to the inner workings (or revisions as they called them), and I wondered if this changed the performance or if it was just minor improvements regarding heat and noise and so on.
    To finish, does anyone have any speculation as if this is a good time to buy a MacBook Pro with the introduction of the Core 2 Duo chips in the new iMacs?
    Many thanks.
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   1.83GHz Core Duo / 512MB / 80GB

    So what you are saying is that the 170 MHZ difference between the 1.83 and the 2.0 is noticeable, but the 160 MHZ difference between the 2.0 and the 2.16 is not?
    I thought we were passed the marketing gimmicks and the clock speed race, but I guess not.
    Clock speed doesn't tell you anything about the performance of a CPU. Intel almost ran themselves into the ground by trying to pump up their clock speeds and feeding that tripe to the masses. AMD focused on a solid architecture that created a robust chip. As a result AMD took the lead in performance and stability.
    Intel's greatest achievement to date has been the PIII Coppermine. So good was this architecture that they have gone back to it. The Centrinos are based off the Coppermines as are the dual cores.
    The point of the story is that clock speed means nothing. Save your cash and put it to better use by getting a 7200 rpm drive or more RAM.

  • Any rendering differences between Safari 1.3 and 2.0?

    Can anyone point me to information about what differences, if any, exist between Safari 1.3 and 2.0? I am only interested in differences in rendering (HTML/CSS/JavaScript, i.e. WebKit), not in things like RSS feed support.
    To put it another way, do Safari 1.3.1 and 2.0.1 have the same version of WebKit?
    I do not have Panther installed on any of my Macs, so I cannot easily investigate this.
    Any assistance is appreciated.

    So what you are saying is that the 170 MHZ difference between the 1.83 and the 2.0 is noticeable, but the 160 MHZ difference between the 2.0 and the 2.16 is not?
    I thought we were passed the marketing gimmicks and the clock speed race, but I guess not.
    Clock speed doesn't tell you anything about the performance of a CPU. Intel almost ran themselves into the ground by trying to pump up their clock speeds and feeding that tripe to the masses. AMD focused on a solid architecture that created a robust chip. As a result AMD took the lead in performance and stability.
    Intel's greatest achievement to date has been the PIII Coppermine. So good was this architecture that they have gone back to it. The Centrinos are based off the Coppermines as are the dual cores.
    The point of the story is that clock speed means nothing. Save your cash and put it to better use by getting a 7200 rpm drive or more RAM.

  • What are the OS differences between mini, mini server and XServe?

    Hi,
    Apart from cpu speed disk size and memory,
    what are the differences between the mac mini and the mini server?
    What, if any, are the differences in the OS, software tools etc?
    Also, what are the differences between the OS in the mini, mini server
    and the XServe (apart from of course cpu cores etc)?
    Thanks

    Thanks.
    Is it safe to say that these two pages list
    all the differences?
    http://www.apple.com/macosx/specs.html
    http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/specs.html
    Or is there any doc from Apple that lists the differences?
    Thanks.

  • Whats's the difference between MacBook Pro 13 and 13.3 ?

    This, Whats's the difference between MacBook Pro 13 and 13.3 ?

    Firstly, you are not in MacBook Pro forum, so you need to get your bearings.
    2nd check the specs page
    http://www.apple.com/support/macbookpro
    Then Bing/Google for reviews, Ars is always good but dozens have done one.
    2011 brings Intel Sandy Bridge processor boards, Thunderbolt, SATA3 (6G) along with options for SSD and much more RAM (can save buying RAM and doing the upgrade yourself)

  • Documentation on differences between Version ECC 6 and Old version

    We are looking for information/documentation on differences between Version ECC 6 and Old version for HCM. Appreciate for your great help.
    Best Regards,
    Eric

    Hai..
    Re: differnce b/n 4.7 and  ecc 6.0
    Re: Difference Between SAP Version ECC 4.6, 4.7, SAP 5.0, 6.0 with SA
    https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/releasenotesRelease Notes
    http://service.sap.com/erp
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://service.sap.com/instguides
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/

  • What is the difference between MacBook pro 2011 and 2012

    What is the difference between MacBook pro 2011 and 2012

    understanding that at the time of the question, there has not been any Macbook Pro 2012, now it is later and there is.
    The difference is:
    -CPU being used (2011 models: Sandy Bridge, 2012 models: Ivy Bridge)
    -Graphics (2011: intel 3000 + on 15"/17" ATI, 2012: intel 4000 + on 5"/17" nvidia Geforce 650M)
    -USB (2011: USB2.0 only, 2012: USB3.0)
    -Bluetooth (2011. 2.1 + EDR, 2012: 4.0)
    Ivy Bridge CPUs are smaller and are a little bit more energy-efficient.
    Other than that, currently the devices are not much different in respect to performance (Apple's graphics driver performance is known to increase during upgrades, though, so the performance gap may widen up)

  • Difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 6.0

    HI ,
    What are the differences between SAP 4.7 and SAP ECC6.0 .
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    http://service.sap.com/erp
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
    http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
    For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
    Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
    Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
    Click on Search
    Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
    and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
    Thanks
    Pathan

  • Difference between SAP Software Kernel and the files in Kernel Directory

    27.     What is the difference between SAP Software Kernel and the files in Kernel Directory

    well... the OS kernel is for the... "OS" and the SAP Kernel is for.... "SAP"
    A kernel is the core of any application, basically is a set of programs and parameters that tell the system how to behave.
    Regards
    Juan

  • What is the difference between SAP HR module and SAP-ABAP-HR?

    what is the difference between SAP HR module and SAP-ABAP-HR?
    Thanks in advance..:)

    Hi,
    SAP-HR is software component like SAP-BASIS is a component.
    Its part of the CORE.
    As far as I know there is nothing like SAP-ABAP-HR.
    But ABAP offers some special syntax for HR though.
    Like INFOTYPES, PROVIDE ENDPROVDIE etc.
    Regards,
    Sesh

  • Difference between "Order to Delivery" and "Order to Cash"

    Hi,
            This could be a basic question. But, can any one tell me the difference between 'Order to Delivery" and "Order to Cash" Process.
    Thanks
    Anitha

    hi
    Order to cash cycle in SD starts with Inquiry -> Quotation -> Order -> Delivery ->Picking-->Post Goods Issue -> Invoice -> Accounting Document generation
    For Inquiry
    Doc. Type: IN
    T.Code: VA11(create), VA12(change), VA13(display)
    Process: Quotation
    Doc. Type: QT
    T.Code: VA21(create), VA22(change), VA23(display)
    Process: Order
    T.Code: VA01(create), VA02(change), VA03(display)
    Doc. Type: OR
    For Delivery
    Doc. Type: LF
    T.Code: VL01N(create), VL02N(change), VL03(display)
    For Billing
    Doc. Type: F2
    T.Code: VF01(cre ate), VF02(change), VF03(display)
    For Accounting Document
    T.Code: FB03(display)
    where as ORDER TO DELIVERY
    Delivery Order is the term of core team normally used for Delivery. Ideally insome of the legacy, they do not create Sales Order & use the term Delivery Order for Delivery.
    InSAP, we mornally map it as Sales order --> Delivery --> Post Goods issue --> Billing.
    At times we have to give meaning to the term sprecified by core team / end user & arrive at SAP terminology.

  • From ABAP view, what is the difference between version 4.7 and ECC 6.0 ?

    Hi,
    I am a ABAP developer. I want to know the difference between version 4.7 and ECC 6.0 from a programmer
    perspective.
    I also want to know  what is obsoleted and what is enhanced.
    Thanks.
    Best Regards,
    Chris Gu

    I'm not sure if any of this is in your 4.7 version, but I know it wasn't available in our 4.6C before we upgraded and we have found the following extremely helpful in ECC 6.0:
    1.  The new ABAP Debugger - Search SDN and you'll probably find a bunch of info on these enhancements
    2.  The Enhancement Framework - this is a great new framework allowing enhancements to standard SAP programs without having to use "core Mods".  Had we known about it prior to our upgrade, we could have probably eliminated 75% or so of our custom Z Programs which are copies of standard SAP code  and 100% of our core mods (of which we only have a handful)
    3. Code Inspector and more importantly the ability to turn it on to automatically run when releasing a transport.
    4. The ABAP workbench has changed a bit with a new editor including some minimal code completion.
    5.  Automatic generation of services from any remote enabled function module.
    These are just a few of the things that I've found helpful in an upgraded environment.

  • What is difference between 4.6c version and 4.7ee version

    Hello to all,
    Pls, help me.
    what is difference between 4.6c version and 4.7ee version?
    It is urgent tommorow I have an interview.
    thanks & regards,
    raju.

    Hi
    Check these links
    You can find the difference in release notes of each SAP version.
    Here are the links.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fc/e3003deddfae4de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/28/b34c40cc538437e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/68805bb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm
    Please visit the following links:
    http://service.sap.com/erp
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
    http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
    For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    One major difference is that 4.6 runs on what they call the basis layer, in 4.7 the basis layer was majorly modified to include new web technologies, hence the renaming of Basis to Web Application Server. 4.7 runs on the Web Application Server 6.20. With this, was the introduction to BSPs or Business Server Pages.
    Also have a look at the link:
    http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAP_Enterprise_4point7.pdf
    Here is a quick short list though:- Statements for character processing have additions IN BYTE MODE and IN CHARACTER MODE, this affects statements like DESCRIBE LENGTH, OPEN DATASET
    Header lines should not longer be used for tables (in OO context this is not even possible)
    TABLES statement in reports should no longer be used
    PNPCE for concurrent employement (new logical DB for HR)
    For OO abap there a plenty of short forms for method calls that were not previously available.
    One very cool feature is that data reference's can have actual data types and van be referenced directly without field symbols.
    Additions to many abap statements, for example there is now a ALL OCCURENCES addition to the replace statement.
    Class based exceptions are now available (although it is debatable how usefull these are seeing as there is no FINALLY part to the try catch statement, very disappointing but maybe that is just me).
    Friends have been introduced for OO abap.
    Dynamic program has plenty of improvements, for example there is now a TYPE TABLE OF variant for create data which lets you dynamically create an internal table with a structure type, your can also now call a class constructor with different importing parameters dynamically.
    Regards
    Kiran

Maybe you are looking for