Difference between keys Incoterms part 1+ 2 & Incoterms

Hi experts,
I am creating a freight condition record KF00. There are two variable keys assigned to it Incoterms part 1+ 2 and Incoterms.
What is difference between these two keys?
thank you

Incoterms part 1 & 2 reads table 34 and has fields Incoterms 1 & incoterms 2.
System takes incoterms 1 information from customer master record, sales area data tab billing document.
Incoterms 2 is used if the primary Incoterm is, for example, FOB ("Free on Board"), then the second field provides details of the port from which the delivery leaves (for example, "FOB Boston").
In pricing determination, system first checks from most specific to general and so it first searches for pricing record KF00 with key Incoterms part 1+ 2 to determine freight price.
If record is not found by above process, then it searches for KF00 record with key Incoterms which has field incoterms 1.

Similar Messages

Difference between cooling fan part no. 650847-001 and part no. 665277-001?

Replacing fan in pavilion dv6-6117dx... - the fan has become very noisy. I see that HP is no longer selling fan part no. 650847-001, but I've located that part (new). HP is now selling fan part no. 665277-001. What is difference between cooling fan part no. 650847-001 and part no. 665277-001?

Replacing fan in pavilion dv6-6117dx... - the fan has become very noisy. I see that HP is no longer selling fan part no. 650847-001, but I've located that part (new). HP is now selling fan part no. 665277-001. What is difference between cooling fan part no. 650847-001 and part no. 665277-001?

Difference between Key figure and a Key field?

Difference between Key figure and a Key field?
Thanks,
Pramod

Hi,
Key fileds as just like your primary key of R/3 Tables.
Key figure are type of info object which is used to hold amout,value for your info providers..
check this link for key figures and there types...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw31/helpdata/en/80/1a63b3e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
under "Tab Page: Aggregation". you can be able to find three aggregation options:
Minimum
Maximum
Sum
Types of non-cumulative keyfigures
Regards,
Viren.

Difference between Key Process Indicator or Key Performance Indicator

Hi Experts,
Can any body give me the difference between
Key Process Indicator or Key Performance Indicator
Like description , Scenorio, difference, where it will be used in companies, What will be measured by using these things.
I have to interact with my client for gathering the requirements on basis of these KPI's . Please guid me how to finish this task successfully.
Regards
Vijay

Hello Vijay,
Regarding Key Peerformance indicator all experts have already explain well...
I would like to focus on Key Process Indicator: It is always process specific. The main KPI (Key performance indicator is breaked into smaller componenets based on Time, Material used, Manpower used etc)
So for key process indicators we can have reports like Process yield by operation, Process yield by manpower spend etc..
Also the cost of non confirmance is calculated based on the Key Process indicator as it comes from small small reports and finally come up as a Big cost for Non confirmance.
During the process audit the major focus is always on key processes. Using leam manufacturing functions these process are audited and are subjected to change if the indicators are on lower side..
Key Performance Indicators give us a broder view on buisness and mainly useful for knowing in which direction the bussiness is going...
Hope it will be helpful.
br,
Pushkar

Difference between key-next-item and when-validate-item

Hi All
Can any body give answer pls. this is very urgent. Alternativly can mail to [email protected]
Thanks
Reddy

Duplicate
Difference between key-next-item and when-validate-item

Difference between Key feilds and Data fileds in ODS

Hi team,
What is diff between data fields and Key fileds in ODS ?.
Pl let me know.
Regards,
Senthil

Hi
Key fields:
Unique identification of record: uniqueness of a record in ods is maintained by how you define the key fiedls in the ods. key fields in the ods are equal to the primany indexes on a table.
If you activate the ODS it will generate a Table with Primarykey which you defined in the ODS.
Datafields:
data fields that can also contain character fields and keyfigures.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a6/1205406640c442e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Regards,
Senthil Kumar.P

What's the difference between these two parts?

I have an Early 2005 Mini which I want to add airport & bluetooth to.
I've found part number M9870Z/A - airport & bluetooth upgrade kit, but I've also found M9870ZM/A (note the additional "M").
Does anyone know if this is the same item, or if there's an important difference I'm missing?
Also, is it compatible with my Mac?
Thanks,
David

Could it be related to RoHS? Around 2006 there was a major shift in the IT industry to get certain hazardous materials out of electronics. Many marketing part numbers showed a small change. It could be that one has lead-free solder and the other does not. That would be my guess.

Difference between semantic and key fields in DSO

Hello All,
Please help me in understanding about difference between "Key fields" and "Semantic key" in write optimize DSO.
thanks

Hi,
you dont have key fields in write-optimized DSO, key fields terminology is forin standard DSO.
And semantic key is used in write-optimized DSO.
As we know standard DSO is a flat structure similar to transparent tables that we have in R3/ECC system with key fields (combination of values which needs to be unique).
Now, The system generates a unique technical key for the write-optimized DataStore object. The standard key fields are not necessary with this type of DataStore object. If there are standard key fields anyway, they are called semantic keys so that they can be distinguished from the technical keys. The technical key consists of the Request GUID field (0REQUEST), the Data Package field (0DATAPAKID) and the Data Record Number field (0RECORD). Only new data records are loaded to this key.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/e3/e60138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm

What is diffrernce between key figures and characteristics?

Hi all,
I am a newbie to SAP BI....i am doing Masters in ERP(SAP)....I have confusion about what is basic difference between key figures and characteristics?
Why do we have to define attributes in characteristics?
If any one can refer me a thread that answers my questions or explain with very lucid example I will highly appreciate it.....please answer this question as I have just spend 4-5 months studying BI and have not really implemented in the Industry but we do have access to SAP BI where we perform tutorials....
Also please let me know the links to materials where basics of BI are explained in a very simple way.....
Thanks,
Regards,
Rahul

KF is anything which can quantitatively measured: Amount, Number, Value, Price... whatever you want to measure is called Key Figure. This key figures are also called KPI (Key Performance Indicator). If you want to know the number of sales orders, the number of deliveries, the amount of deliveries... all are key figures
And to add to that, key figures are also divided into two:
Cumulative KF: Like I said, amount, value, price
Non-cumulative KF, this is different kind of key figures which shouldn't be summed up, for example: Age, Inventory, Number of Employees. When you measure this key figures, you don't add the age of every body, because that doesn't make any sense, but adding the sum of all deliveries, or adding all Sales does make sense, that is the difference between the two key figures.
Characteristics: are anything which couldn't be quantitatively measured: material, customer, plant, employee ID and so on...
Aways, in BI you measure the KF against the Key figures..
thanks.
Wond

What is the difference between mc947ll and MD301LL

What is the difference between these 2 part numbers for the iPad2 Leather case
MD301LL appears to be offered on Apple store while MC947LL is a 3rd party offering
but I dont see a difference in specs but the MC947LL is offered for a lower price
Rob

HSRP Versus VRRP Comparison Table
HSRP
VRRP
Propietary
Standards based
RFC 2281
RFC 3768
Separate IP Address needed for the Virtual
Can use the physical IP Address of the Virtual, if needed, saving IP space.
One Master, One Standby, all others are listening
One Master, all other routers are backup
More familiar to most network engineers
Less familiar - yet very similar
Can track an interface for failover
Can track an interface for failover (depending on operating system and version, it can also track the reachability of an IP address)
All HSRP routers use multicast hello packets to 224.0.0.2 (all routers) for version 1 or 224.0.0.102 for version 2.
All VRRP routers use IP protcol number 112 (vrrp) to communicate via multicast IP address 224.0.0.18
All virtual router must use MAC address 0000.0c07.acXX where XX is the group ID.
All virtual routers must use 00-00-5E-00-01-XX as its Media Access Control (MAC) address

Difference between primary key and primary index

Dear All,
Hi... .Could you pls tell me the difference between primary key and primary index.
Thanks...

Hi,
Primary Key : It is one which makes an entry of the field unique.No two distinct rows in a table can have the same value (or combination of values) in those columns.
Eg: first entry is 111, if you again enter value 111 , it doesnot allow 111 again. similarly for the strings or characters or numc etc. Remember that for char or numc or string 'NAME' is not equal to 'name'.
Primary Index: this is related to the performance .A database index is a data structure that improves the speed of operations in a table. Indices can be created using one or more columns, providing the basis for both rapid random lookups and efficient ordering of access to records. The disk space required to store the index is typically less than the storage of the table (since indices usually contain only the key-fields according to which the table is to be arranged, and excludes all the other details in the table), yielding the possibility to store indices into memory from tables that would not fit into it. In a relational database an index is a copy of part of a table. Some databases extend the power of indexing by allowing indices to be created on functions or expressions. For example, an index could be created on upper(last_name), which would only store the uppercase versions of the last_name field in the index.
In a database , we may have a large number of records. At the time of retrieving data from the database based on a condition , it is a burden to the db server. so whenever we create a primary key , a primary index is automatically created by the system.
If you want to maintain indices on other fields which are frequently used in where condition then you can create secondary indices.
Reward points if helpful.
Thanks,
Sirisha..

Difference Between Radio Button Group By Index and Key

what is main difference between RadioButtonGroupByIndex and RadioButtonGroupByKey ? And In which situvation we go for RBGBIndex and RBGBKey?

They do not differ from each other when displayed on the screen. However, the data binding model for the two UI elements is compeletely different. Index & Key Binding concepts are very elaborately explained in the following <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/d7/f08841e3af1609e10000000a155106/frameset.htm">SAP Help</a>
~Suresh

Difference between Unique key and Unique index

Hi All,
I've got confused in the difference between unique index & unique key in a table.
While we create a unique index on a table, its created as a unique index.
On the other hand, if we create a unique key/constraint on the table, Oracle also creates an index entry for that. So I can find the same name object in all_constraints as well as in all_indexes.
My question here is that if during creation of unique key/constraint, an index is automatically created than why is the need to create unique key and then two objects , while we can create only one object i.e. unique index.
Thanks
Deepak

This is only my understanding and is not according to any documentation, that is as follows.
The unique key (constraint) needs an unique index for achieving constraint of itself.
Developers and users can make any constraint (unique-key, primary-key, foreign-key, not-null ...) to enable,disable and be deferable. Unique key is able to be enabled, disabled, deferable.
On the other hand, the index is used for performance-up originally, unique index itself doesn't have the concept like constraints. The index (including non-unique, unique) can be rebuilded,enabled,disabled etc. But I think that index cannot be set "deferable-builded" automatic.

Difference between PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE KEY with NOT NULL

What is the difference between PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE KEY with NOT NULL constraint?
Message was edited by:
Nilesh Hole

Answer for the master!!!
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8743855576462
Thanks,
Karthick

Huge performance differences between a map listener for a key and filter

Hi all,
I wanted to test different kind of map listener available in Coherence 3.3.1 as I would like to use it as an event bus. The result was that I found huge performance differences between them. In my use case, I have data which are time stamped so the full key of the data is the key which identifies its type and the time stamp. Unfortunately, when I had my map listener to the cache, I only know the type id but not the time stamp, thus I cannot add a listener for a key but for a filter which will test the value of the type id. When I launch my test, I got terrible performance results then I tried a listener for a key which gave me much better results but in my case I cannot use it.
Here are my results with a Dual Core of 2.13 GHz
1) Map Listener for a Filter
a) No Index
Create (data always added, the key is composed by the type id and the time stamp)
Cache.put
Test 1: Total 42094 millis, Avg 1052, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 80000
Cache.putAll
Test 2: Total 43860 millis, Avg 1096, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 80000
Update (data added then updated, the key is only composed by the type id)
Cache.put
Test 3: Total 56390 millis, Avg 1409, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 2000
Cache.putAll
Test 4: Total 51734 millis, Avg 1293, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 2000
b) With Index
Cache.put
Test 5: Total 39594 millis, Avg 989, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 80000
Cache.putAll
Test 6: Total 43313 millis, Avg 1082, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 80000
Update
Cache.put
Test 7: Total 55390 millis, Avg 1384, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 2000
Cache.putAll
Test 8: Total 51328 millis, Avg 1283, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 2000
2) Map Listener for a Key
Update
Cache.put
Test 9: Total 3937 millis, Avg 98, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 2000
Cache.putAll
Test 10: Total 1078 millis, Avg 26, Total Tries 40, Cache Size 2000
Please help me to find what is wrong with my code because for now it is unusable.
Best Regards,
Nicolas
Here is my code
import java.io.DataInput;
import java.io.DataOutput;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import com.tangosol.io.ExternalizableLite;
import com.tangosol.net.CacheFactory;
import com.tangosol.net.NamedCache;
import com.tangosol.util.Filter;
import com.tangosol.util.MapEvent;
import com.tangosol.util.MapListener;
import com.tangosol.util.extractor.ReflectionExtractor;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.EqualsFilter;
import com.tangosol.util.filter.MapEventFilter;
public class TestFilter {
      * To run a specific test, just launch the program with one parameter which
      * is the test index
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          if (args.length != 1) {
               System.out.println("Usage : java TestFilter 1-10|all");
               System.exit(1);
          final String arg = args[0];
          if (arg.endsWith("all")) {
               for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
                    test(i);
          } else {
               final int testIndex = Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
               if (testIndex < 1 || testIndex > 10) {
                    System.out.println("Usage : java TestFilter 1-10|all");
                    System.exit(1);
               test(testIndex);
     @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
     private static void test(int testIndex) {
          final NamedCache cache = CacheFactory.getCache("test-cache");
          final int totalObjects = 2000;
          final int totalTries = 40;
          if (testIndex >= 5 && testIndex <= 8) {
               // Add index
               cache.addIndex(new ReflectionExtractor("getKey"), false, null);
          // Add listeners
          for (int i = 0; i < totalObjects; i++) {
               final MapListener listener = new SimpleMapListener();
               if (testIndex < 9) {
                    // Listen to data with a given filter
                    final Filter filter = new EqualsFilter("getKey", i);
                    cache.addMapListener(listener, new MapEventFilter(filter), false);
               } else {
                    // Listen to data with a given key
                    cache.addMapListener(listener, new TestObjectSimple(i), false);
          // Load data
          long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
          for (int iTry = 0; iTry < totalTries; iTry++) {
               final long currentTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
               final Map<Object, Object> buffer = new HashMap<Object, Object>(totalObjects);
               for (int i = 0; i < totalObjects; i++) {
                    final Object obj;
                    if (testIndex == 1 || testIndex == 2 || testIndex == 5 || testIndex == 6) {
                         // Create data with key with time stamp
                         obj = new TestObjectComplete(i, currentTime);
                    } else {
                         // Create data with key without time stamp
                         obj = new TestObjectSimple(i);
                    if ((testIndex & 1) == 1) {
                         // Load data directly into the cache
                         cache.put(obj, obj);
                    } else {
                         // Load data into a buffer first
                         buffer.put(obj, obj);
               if (!buffer.isEmpty()) {
                    cache.putAll(buffer);
          time = System.currentTimeMillis() - time;
          System.out.println("Test " + testIndex + ": Total " + time + " millis, Avg " + (time / totalTries) + ", Total Tries " + totalTries + ", Cache Size " + cache.size());
          cache.destroy();
     public static class SimpleMapListener implements MapListener {
          public void entryDeleted(MapEvent evt) {}
          public void entryInserted(MapEvent evt) {}
          public void entryUpdated(MapEvent evt) {}
     public static class TestObjectComplete implements ExternalizableLite {
          private static final long serialVersionUID = -400722070328560360L;
          private int key;
          private long time;
          public TestObjectComplete() {}
          public TestObjectComplete(int key, long time) {
               this.key = key;
               this.time = time;
          public int getKey() {
               return key;
          public void readExternal(DataInput in) throws IOException {
               this.key = in.readInt();
               this.time = in.readLong();
          public void writeExternal(DataOutput out) throws IOException {
               out.writeInt(key);
               out.writeLong(time);
     public static class TestObjectSimple implements ExternalizableLite {
          private static final long serialVersionUID = 6154040491849669837L;
          private int key;
          public TestObjectSimple() {}
          public TestObjectSimple(int key) {
               this.key = key;
          public int getKey() {
               return key;
          public void readExternal(DataInput in) throws IOException {
               this.key = in.readInt();
          public void writeExternal(DataOutput out) throws IOException {
               out.writeInt(key);
          public int hashCode() {
               return key;
          public boolean equals(Object o) {
               return o instanceof TestObjectSimple && key == ((TestObjectSimple) o).key;
}Here is my coherence config file
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE cache-config SYSTEM "cache-config.dtd">
<cache-config>
     <caching-scheme-mapping>
          <cache-mapping>
               <cache-name>test-cache</cache-name>
               <scheme-name>default-distributed</scheme-name>
          </cache-mapping>
     </caching-scheme-mapping>
     <caching-schemes>
          <distributed-scheme>
               <scheme-name>default-distributed</scheme-name>
               <backing-map-scheme>
                    <class-scheme>
                         <scheme-ref>default-backing-map</scheme-ref>
                    </class-scheme>
               </backing-map-scheme>
          </distributed-scheme>
          <class-scheme>
               <scheme-name>default-backing-map</scheme-name>
               <class-name>com.tangosol.util.SafeHashMap</class-name>
          </class-scheme>
     </caching-schemes>
</cache-config>Message was edited by:
user620763

Hi Robert,
Indeed, only the Filter.evaluate(Object obj)
method is invoked, but the object passed to it is a
MapEvent.<< In fact, I do not need to implement EntryFilter to
get a MapEvent, I could get the same result (in my
last message) by writting
cache.addMapListener(listener, filter,
true)instead of
cache.addMapListener(listener, new
MapEventFilter(filter) filter, true)
I believe, when the MapEventFilter delegates to your filter it always passes a value object to your filter (old or new), meaning a value will be deserialized.
If you instead used your own filter, you could avoid deserializing the value which usually is much larger, and go to only the key object. This would of course only be noticeable if you indeed used a much heavier cached value class.
The hashCode() and equals() does not matter on
the filter class<< I'm not so sure since I noticed that these methods
were implemented in the EqualsFilter class, that they
are called at runtime and that the performance
results are better when you add them
That interests me... In what circumstances did you see them invoked? On the storage node before sending an event, or upon registering a filtered listener?
If the second, then I guess the listeners are stored in a hash-based map of collections keyed by a filter, and indeed that might be relevant as in that case it will cause less passes on the filter for multiple listeners with an equalling filter.
DataOutput.writeInt(int) writes 4 bytes.
ExternalizableHelper.writeInt(DataOutput, int) writes
1-5 bytes (or 1-6?), with numbers with small absolute
values consuming less bytes.Similar differences exist
for the long type as well, but your stamp attribute
probably will be a large number...<< I tried it but in my use case, I got the same
results. I guess that it must be interesting, if I
serialiaze/deserialiaze many more objects.
Also, if Coherence serializes an
ExternalizableLite object, it writes out its
class-name (except if it is a Coherence XmlBean). If
you define your key as an XmlBean, and add your class
into the classname cache configuration in
ExternalizableHelper.xml, then instead of the
classname, only an int will be written. This way you
can spare a large percentage of bandwidth consumed by
transferring your key instance as it has only a small
number of attributes. For the value object, it might
or might not be so relevant, considering that it will
probably contain many more attributes. However, in
case of a lite event, the value is not transferred at
all.<< I tried it too and in my use case, I noticed that
we get objects nearly twice lighter than an
ExternalizableLite object but it's slower to get
them. But it is very intersting to keep in mind, if
we would like to reduce the network traffic.
Yes, these are minor differences at the moment.
As for the performance of XMLBean, it is a hack, but you might try overriding the readExternal/writeExternal method with your own usual ExternalizableLite implementation stuff. That way you get the advantages of the xmlbean classname cache, and avoid its reflection-based operation, at the cost of having to extend XMLBean.
Also, sooner or later the TCMP protocol and the distributed cache storages will also support using PortableObject as a transmission format, which enables using your own classname resolution and allow you to omit the classname from your objects. Unfortunately, I don't know when it will be implemented.
>
But finally, I guess that I found the best solution
for my specific use case which is to use a map
listener for a key which has no time stamp, but since
the time stamp is never null, I had just to check
properly the time stamp in the equals method.
I would still recommend to use a separate key class, use a custom filter which accesses only the key and not the value, and if possible register a lite listener instead of a heavy one. Try it with a much heavier cached value class where the differences are more pronounced.
Best regards,
Robert

Difference between keys Incoterms part 1+ 2 & Incoterms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for