Difference between late-2012 and early-2013 mbp retina 13"?

I just bought the early-2013 mbp retina from the refurbished section of the mac site.
It seems to be v. difficult to get detailed info on this model. Most web queries about aspects of this model bring up info on the late-2012 model.
Is this some sort of freak model that was a limited run?
One of the main reasons I ask is that I have a 512gb SSD, and I'm looking to replace it with the 768gb SSD module. The SSD module I am looking to buy advertises itself as being compatible with the late-2012, but no mention of early-2013.
The late-2012 and early-2013 share the same model number (A1425), should I assume they carry the same architecture under the hood?
**Before you reply**
- Yes, I know I'm not supposed to open the computer, might void the warranty etc.
- No, I didn't have the option of the 768gb SSD when I bought it, it was already assembled. I got it cheap.
- Yes, I am aware that SSD upgrade is an expensive option.
- Yes, I am aware I can store additional data on an external HDD.
- Yes, I am aware I can boot from a higher capacity external HDD.
- No, I don't want to know about alternative options, just the one outlined in the original query.
Thanks.

didvid.s,
the technical specifications for the two models are here and here. Contrast and compare them to your heart’s content.

Similar Messages

Are there a difference in late 2012 and early 2013 models of 13inch MBP retina?

checked my serial number and it happens to be late 2012 model which i bought 4 days ago, but are there a difference in early 2013 MBPR compared to late 2012?

i have the cheapest 2.5 model one
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Pro
at the very bottom table it states the model number mine is MD212 under there is 2.5ghz in late 2013
however on the early 2013 there are also 2.5ghz one but with different model number e.g.ME664

Startup Disk not there when reinstalling OSX (Early 2013 MBP retina)

I had reinstalled the OSX on my MBP a few times so I am not unfamiliar with the process of rebooting from the boot menu, formatting via the disk utility and then reinstalling either via a backup or from the internet backup (as the retina does not have a dvd drive).
Doing it this time and I did nothing different, however upon entering the disk utility screen, the main disk image simply wasn't there. I was conducting a reinstall of OSX from the internet and had already downloaded the new software, as you have to do when installing from the internet. I then came to the disk utility screen, ready to reformat the hard drive and it simply wasn't there at all. The only image there was the one I had just downloaded ready to install.
Thinking this extremely strange, I reboot the computer and it takes ages, then comes to a screen with a continually flashing folder symbol with a question mark in it. I have left it like this for 30 mins with no change.
So now, I cannot boot normally, and I cannot reinstall a downloaded image on the main SSD because it is not showing at all in the disk utility.
I have plugged in an external hard drive and am currently installing a new image on this to try to check where the main hard drive is once it is up and running, but any help at all would be greatly appreciated.
As mentioned, it is an early 2013 MBP retina, the warranty is up so cannot take it back to apple.

If you live near an Apple Store, make a Genius Bar appointment to have the computer tested. Supposedly there is no charge for testing. Use 2nd link if not near an Apple Store or aren’t in the US.
Genius Bar Reservation US
Authorized Service Provider

Flash won't install after downloading...early 2013 MBP/Retina, 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz Ram, 3GHz Intel Core i7 Processor (clean installation)

Flash Player won’t install after downloading
On the first attempt to install v14, Flash Player v13 was installed and working fine.
I opened the installation package for the new Flash Player, followed standard protocol for installing Mac software and it hung before retrieving anything.
Subsequently, while watching the beach ball spin, I got an error message that the installer could not retrieve the v13 Flash Player software.
So I uninstalled Flash Player 13 and again attempted to install v14, only to see the spinning beach ball followed by a message that the installer could not retrieve the v14 Flash Player software.
I am running OS X v10.9.4 on an early 2013 MBP/Retina display with 3GHz Intel Core i7 processor and 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz Ram.
If you have any ideas or suggestions regarding my issue, please let me know.
Sincerely.
JWH

Try un-installing and then re-installing via the web site.
Adobe Flash Uninstaller
Adobe Flash Player

Are there any differences between Server 2012 and Server 2012 R2 that might impact TFS or SQL server required for TFS?

Hi,
In the interest of just getting started and learning the basics of setting up TFS, I previously setup an IDE using a large workstation running Windows 8. I set up the required servers for TFS using VM's through Hyper-V. I am now transferring
everything to a new and separate physical server.
My question stems from a problem I had when I originally setup the TFS system the 1st time. I couldn't get SQL server to work using the Server 2012 R2 download from the subscription center. When I used Server 2012, it worked, so I proceeded that
way just to get going.
So now I'm setting things up anew on a new physical box, I want to ask up front, is there some difference in the R2 version that causes problems with either TFS or SQL server, or was there likely some oversight on my part when I did things the 1st time?
As an addendum to my question, I always assumed R2 merely means the Server software has progressed to a refined state and is ready for wide distribution and easy setup. I assumed that there are no differences between the Standard version and the R2
version. Is that understanding correct?
Thanks.

Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your response. That's a great link. I don't recall seeing a page that is so clear and easy to read back when I was doing this the 1st time, but I probably just missed it. That helps.
I am/was using TFS2013 and VS2013. As I recall, my problem was getting SQL Server to work, but I thought asking this question on this forum was wiser because I figured everyone using TFS would be well familiar with these issues.
At any rate, it seems as though TFS2013 is fine with Server 2012 standard or R2.
I was using SQL Server 2012, and it also seems as though it works on R2:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143506(v=sql.110).aspx
Anyway, thanks for your support. I'll be trying this again and we'll see.

Differences between 3.5 and earlier versions

Hi Experts,
What are the major differences between BW 3.5 and earlier versions like 3.1c and 3.0b.
PLZ educate me on this,
thanks in advance.
regards,

Hi Vamshi,
pls Check these Links for information:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/b21f98be886a45a4bb7e123e86e4c2/content.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a6c3b990-0201-0010-14b8-b3cce168c1c5
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e3/e60138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
BW 3.1 Vs 3.5
difference b/w BW 3.1 and BW 3.5
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/B2/E50138FEDE083DE10000009B38F8CF/frameset.htm
New Features In BW 3.5:
1. Information Broadcasting via Business Explorer (BEx) Broadcaster
2. Universal Data Integration
3. Embedded BI: Integration into SAP NetWeaver
4. BI Platform Enhancements
5. Planning and Simulation (BW-BPS)
also check by this navigation.
RSA1-->Menu --> Help --> Release Notes --> Select Entire list --> Select BW and display.
***pls assign points if info is useful**
Regards
CSM Reddy

Graphics concern with early 2013, MBP Retina 15 2.4 i7

I was having issues with my graphics glitching / stuttering (if that makes sense) when scrolling zooming. All my icons across the bottom would almost vibrate as the cursor past over them. Anyway, the good guys as Apple Genius (after id done the AHT / PRAM) replaced my machine like for like with a brand new early 2013 model (slight upgrade to 2.4).
Anyway - I also have the new IMAC - My problem is this; I use google earth. I have this installed to both my MBPR and IMAC. On my IMAC it works faultlessly, smooth and as it should. On my MBPR however it is very glitchy, the screen stutters as i zoom in and move around. It is almost as if the graphics cannot cope.
This new machine is 24hrs old, straight out of the box with OS X 10.8.3 - Does anyone have any ideas of what i can do? Surely this cannot be the way it is for a £2000 machine? I am no Apple expert and recently converted so have everythning apple. I purchased the Retina Pro as my expectations were that it would be the all singing and dancing machine - Any help, suggestions as to what i can do would be fantastic.
Surely this cannot be a faulty machine? The only common thing between this and my last machine is the time machine back up!

Just for info - incase its relevant:
My IMAC is the following model which works pefectly with google earth.
21.5-inch: 2.9GHz
2.9GHz quad-core Intel Core i5
Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz
8GB (two 4GB) memory
1TB hard drive1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 512MB
My Macbook is the following model - Same google earth download, but graphics are really glitchy, stuttery when zooming in or out.
15-inch: 2.4GHz
with Retina display
2.4GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
Turbo Boost up to 3.4GHz
8GB 1600MHz memory
256GB flash storage1
Intel HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of GDDR5 memory
Built-in battery (7 hours)2
dont know if any of this info is relevant but im trying to provide all the info i can!
Hope someone can assist!

Difference between refurb 2012 and new Apple TV?

Is the refurb 2012 Apple TV with A5 any different than the model current sold as new? Are they both 3rd gen and are any specs different?

Hi Douglas.
A 2012 Apple TV could be a Apple TV 2 or an Apple TV3 (which was released on March 7, 2012) So it's something you need to ask when buying it.
If it is the Apple TV 3, it will be the first one and not the revision A model which is sold today. The difference I believe is mainly in the CPU, the first model used a dual core CPU with one core closed off, the rev A version a redesigned CPU with single core but based on the dual core.

Scripting option difference between SSMS 2012 and all previous versions

Hi,
I recently started to use SSMS 2012 (11.0.2100.60) and have seen some differences in scripting behavior of this version with previous ones (since V9). In previous versions when I want to modify a stored procedure, I right clicked on it
and selected “Modify”, and had a nice ALTER script. Now, I have a script using sp_executesql which is really not handy for SQL validation checks. After a research, I figured that I can change this behavior in the scripting options by changing the option “check
for object existence”. Great, it makes the deal!! In fact, no, because now, when I ask to script a DROP and CREATE on a table, I do not have the IF EXSIST part before the DROP anymore.
The behavior I try to have is:
When I hit “modify” on a procedure or other programmatic part, I would like to have an alter statement (DROP CREATE is fine too).
When I choose to script out an object as DROP and CREATE, I would like to have an existence check before the drop.
This is basically what SSMS did before the version 11 and was very helpful.
Regards,
Stef, DBA

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
What do you think about the behavior?
Personally, I checked the links you sent. I cannot agree with sentences like “who cares about the outcome of the DROP when the CREATE
will still work”. When a script runs, it should run without errors, otherwise, how will you detect real issues in the noise? It’s like talking about “normal bug”. Also, “the create procedure must be in its own batch”, that’s what we did with the batch separator
GO.
A proper way to script database modifications (outside the tables itself) is to drop the object if it exists and to create it after.
Why? Because it works in any cases! Also, when I try to modify code, it’s convenient to have validation check against, and that’s why it’s convenient not to have dynamic code. It’s like coding large web sites in notepad. That’s what SSMS 10.50 and below did
perfectly.
I use script DROP CREATE capability when I prepare a migration script. Why should I write code when I have tools doing it for me? As
a DBA, I have to be critic about the script generated and to adapt it if necessary. The MODIFY option is when I debug some code. I expect the tool to validate as much mistakes as possible (yes I do mistakes and I admit it). Like I said before, it’s like working
with notepad as coding tool, it works, but who will do it?
I really would like to know if I’m alone on this position.
Just to make it easier to understand for other people, the following code is what is generated.
With SSMS 10.50.2806.0 (include IF NOT EXISTS clause = true):
Scripting a table as “DROP and CREATE”:
IF
EXISTS
(SELECT
FROM
sys.objects
WHERE
object_id
=
OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[ScrapTable]')
AND
type
in
(N'U'))
DROP
TABLE [dbo].[ScrapTable]
GO
CREATE
TABLE [dbo].[ScrapTable](
                [ScrapID] [int]
NOT
NULL
ON [PRIMARY]
GO
Right click on my stored procedure and hit “Modify”:
ALTER
PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetScrap]
AS
BEGIN
SET
NOCOUNT
ON;
SELECT
FROM dbo.ScrapTable
END
With SSMS 11.0.2200.60 (check for object existence = false):
Scripting a table as “DROP and CREATE”:
DROP
TABLE
[dbo].[ScrapTable]
GO
CREATE
TABLE
[dbo].[ScrapTable](
[ScrapID]
[int]
NOT
NULL
ON
[PRIMARY]
GO
Right click on my stored procedure and hit “Modify”:
ALTER
PROCEDURE
[dbo].[GetScrap]
AS
BEGIN
SET
NOCOUNT
ON;
SELECT
FROM
dbo.ScrapTable
END
With SSMS 11.0.2200.60 (check for object existence = true):
Scripting a table as “DROP and CREATE”:
IF
EXISTS
(SELECT
FROM
sys.objects
WHERE
object_id
=
OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[ScrapTable]')
AND
type
in
(N'U'))
DROP
TABLE
[dbo].[ScrapTable]
GO
IF
NOT
EXISTS
(SELECT
FROM
sys.objects
WHERE
object_id
=
OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[ScrapTable]')
AND
type
in
(N'U'))
BEGIN
CREATE
TABLE
[dbo].[ScrapTable](
[ScrapID]
[int]
NOT
NULL
ON
[PRIMARY]
END
GO
Right click on my stored procedure and hit “Modify”:
IF
EXISTS
(SELECT
FROM
sys.objects
WHERE
object_id
=
OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[GetScrap]')
AND
type
in
(N'P',
N'PC'))
BEGIN
EXEC
dbo.sp_executesql
@statement
=
N'ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetScrap]
AS
BEGIN
                SET NOCOUNT ON;
                SELECT * FROM dbo.ScrapTable
END
END
SSMS 11.0 does it definitely in another way.
Regards,
Stef, DBA

Trying to choose between 2013 MBA,MBP 13'' and new 2013 MBP retina 13''

Hello everyone:) im new here to apple discussions. Basically i would like to ask which laptop i should buy, 2013 Macbook Air 13'', Macbook pro 13'' or Macbook pro retina 13'' (2013). I already have a main 15' inch laptop, i just need something to have extra however, since im investing money i would like to get the worth of it (aka best config too). So even though i can say the MBA is the cheapest and i should buy that since im looking for a secondary laptop, if i can splurge a bit more to get better memory or screen ( my eyes get strained easily so screen is important) that would be great so in my mind its like this
MacBook Air:
Pros: Light,cheapest of the bunch
Cons: Does not come with enough memory, is non upgradeable :/
Macbook Pro
Pros: Upgradeable, DVD drive
Cons: Older model, Heavier, Not that good of a screen (is it les powerful than the air?)
Macbook pro retina
Pros: Great screen, Light, fastest of the bunch
Cons: Expensive/ non upgradeable
IDK WHAT TO DO :c help me?

I am not sure how you are planning to "easily utilise my iMac 2010 27" as display for Mac Mini" I am concerned that might not work out nearly as well as you might think. I have seen that attempted by others and the results were pretty clunky and could easily wipe out any anticipated speed gains. Be sure and talk to someone who uses an iMac as a display for another computer before you spend any money.
That said, if I were in your shoes I would either go with a current top end iMac or a maxed out, top end Mac mini and a 27" Thunderbolt monitor. You will end up spending about the same either way. You can save a few hundred dollars buying factory refurbished machines from the online Apple Store or Smalldog.com but you take your choice of what is available and don't expect it to be there tomorrow.

SSD Upgrade on Late 2013 MBP Retina

I would like to upgrade my SSD on my macbook pro retina late 2013 model it has 512 in it currently and I want to goto 1TB I know its $500 I am willing to pay the difference but apple is saying its is soldered on the logic board. Which clearly is not true. I got my laptop at bestbuy because my old one broke and bestbuy replaced it with a newer model. I would of gotten it from apple but I had to get it from BestBuy since they replaced it.

Thanks for your reply. I may not have been clear enough in my post; OWCs SSDs will NOT work in the late 2013 MacBook Pros (they've clarified their website product description to make that abundantly clear); the newest MacBook Pros use PCIe controllers, both for the SSD interface and for the SDXC slot; the 2012 and early 2013 MacBook Pros use SATA; the two are NOT interchangeable, and OWC doesn't make ANY SSD cards that will work in the newest MacBook Pros (yet).
Of course, that's not relevant for the OP, who has a late 2013 MacBook Pro and wants a bigger SSD. My reply to "helpme05" was intended to suggest to him that there may BE such a product from OWC in the future, because iFixIt's teardown of the newest MacBook Pros shows that the SSD still plugs into a (mecahnically and logically different from that on the 2012 and early 2013 machines) motherboard socket.
Your response DID clear up my misunderstanding of why OWC's SSD maxes out at 480 GB; they're using the more conservative estimate of size (base 2 vs base 10), contrasting with Apple's measurement rubric. So, OWC's 480 GB is the same size as OWC's 512 GB unit.
I'm sure you've heard the joke: "There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don't."
Thanks again,
Jim Robertson

Unreplicable WLAN issues on late 2013 MBP Retina

Hi all,
I've been having a very strange issue with my MacBook's wifi at home. The issue exists only at home, and only on my machine. All other devices (multiple other iPads, iPhones, windows/mac computers, AppleTV, XBOX) function without any issues on our wifi network, and my machine works fine on any other network. So again, only my laptop, only at home.
Basically my MacBook will drop the connection. It has always been an issue but it seems to be getting worse. After pinging my gateway 100 times i got a 76.8% packet loss rate. It seems to connect briefly occasionally, and sometimes will run for up to 20 minutes before it happens again.
We have replaced our router, as well as our Airport Express unit, bu none of these solutions have helped, reinforcing the probability of it being isolated to my laptop.
An authorised Apple reseller told me it's a known software issue which Apple doesn't have an update for, meaning there's nothing I can do about it since software isn't covered by Apple Care. The Apple Store however is convinced that it's our network.
I have had some of the following suggestions:
Switch router to Bridge Mode
Try creating a new user profile on the mac
Try reinstalling OSX
Using static IPs on all devices used at home
Have any of you had the same issue? What are your thoughts on the above solutions? Have any you solved it?

Thanks for your reply. I may not have been clear enough in my post; OWCs SSDs will NOT work in the late 2013 MacBook Pros (they've clarified their website product description to make that abundantly clear); the newest MacBook Pros use PCIe controllers, both for the SSD interface and for the SDXC slot; the 2012 and early 2013 MacBook Pros use SATA; the two are NOT interchangeable, and OWC doesn't make ANY SSD cards that will work in the newest MacBook Pros (yet).
Of course, that's not relevant for the OP, who has a late 2013 MacBook Pro and wants a bigger SSD. My reply to "helpme05" was intended to suggest to him that there may BE such a product from OWC in the future, because iFixIt's teardown of the newest MacBook Pros shows that the SSD still plugs into a (mecahnically and logically different from that on the 2012 and early 2013 machines) motherboard socket.
Your response DID clear up my misunderstanding of why OWC's SSD maxes out at 480 GB; they're using the more conservative estimate of size (base 2 vs base 10), contrasting with Apple's measurement rubric. So, OWC's 480 GB is the same size as OWC's 512 GB unit.
I'm sure you've heard the joke: "There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don't."
Thanks again,
Jim Robertson

AirDrop transfer between Mac mini (late 2012) and MacBook Pro (late 2008) works only one way.

AirDrop transfer between Mac mini (late 2012) and MacBook Pro (late 2008) works only one way. I see both machines on both airdrop windows. Firewalls on both machines are set exactly the same way, and with Network Browser set to allow. Can send a file from Mac mini to MacBook, but not the other way. Never get a window asking to accept on the Mac mini.
Found no useful documentation on AirDrop anywhere in the whole support site.

Maybe this will work. From an Apple support article.
You can also use the Share button to send files to your neighbors via AirDrop. In a Finder window, select the item you want to share, and then click the Share button in the toolbar. For more information about the Share button, see this help topic:

Difference between scom 2012 sp1 and SCOM 2012 R2

what is the difference between scom 2012 sp1 and SCOM 2012 R2 ?

What's New in System Center 2012 R2 Operations Manager:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn249700.aspx

Is there any difference between DDR3 memory and LPDDR3 memory? As i brought my macbook air 2013 recently and i saw the specifications it is indicating DDR3, buy apple website stated LPDDR3. Anyone can advise on this?

Hi
Is there any difference between DDR3 memory and LPDDR3 memory? As i brought my macbook air 2013 recently and i saw the specifications in the system info that is indicating DDR3, but apple website stated LPDDR3. Anyone can advise on this?

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
Read > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_DDR DDR is the RAM used in computers, and LPDDR is common in mobile computers

Difference between late-2012 and early-2013 mbp retina 13"?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for