Difference between Lightroom and JPEG from camera

Hello,
I'm using Panasonic GH2 and sometimes I get really strange result with Lightroom. The first image is JPEG from camera, the second one is from Lightroom. I tried everything but I can't reproduce anything close to JPEG. Any ideas?
JPEG from camera.
RAW from Lightroom.
Just for clarification, quite similar result to Lightroom I also get in Bibble RAW. So, any ideas? I can send also RAW, if it will help you.
Bye, Alan

Yes, first tried WB, Fill Light, etc. The sorrounding light was blue. This was done by decreasing the blue channel in Camera Calibration.
Much better if you ask me.

Similar Messages

Difference between JSF and JPF from WebLogic workshop

Hi i am new to JSF , currently i am working on JPF and i got a chance to work on JSF..
I feel that event drivent programming as same as JSF and In JPF.
Can any body explaine in detail difference between JSF and JPF
Thanks in Advance
Suneel.

JSF is Sun's MVC framework for web applications.
I've never heard of JPF, so it might not be part of Sun.

What is the difference between Lightroom and Elements?

I'm trying to decide between Photoshop Elements and Lightroom--both for a Mac. They seem to have very similar photo editing features. Could anyone tell me some of the differences so that I can see which would be better for my work? One feature that I have to have is the ability to add text to a photo. In Photoshop I can do this with the text tool and layers. Is this a feature of Lightroom too?

Ligtroom is far more like a cross between Bridge and Camera RAW than anything like Elements. LR is designed to work with and process larger quantities of RAW files. It also works with TIFF and jpeg but these are secondary to RAW. LR has some local adjustment ability, with limited brushes and tools. LR has sophistocated databased library structure that allows search and keywording functions even when images are off line. LR allows easy batch editing and synching of RAW settings to multiple files and the creation of multiple 'recipies" in RAW conversion without the need to create multiple files. You don't need to make jpegs to create a simple web page or print files from LR. It will do these directly from the RAW files. LR is completely non-destructive. Exporting an image will make a new file with the changes you specify. Nothing you do will alter the original file.
Elements is for pixel pushing. It allows far more local controls, and manipulation at a pixel level compared to the mostly global controls of LR. In other words it's easier to work on individual parts of an image in Elements. Elements is designed for you to spend more time on an individual file compared to LR which is designed to work on larger quantities of files in a less intricate manner. Cloning, etc are easier/more powerful in Elements. Elements supports stitching and layers. Elements lets you work with text and images. LR does not in any meaningful way (except maybe adding a watermark). Making changes in Elements and then saving the file will permanently change it.
In a nutshell if you're working with larger quantities of images you may prefer LR. However you'll probably still need a pixel editor (like Elements) occasionally. If you work in lower image quantities then Elements is the way to go. You'll still have Bridge to find files/process raw files, but not files that are *offline*. I would suggest Elements first and then add LR when you need its powerfull organisational/search/RAW conversion/non-destructive workflow abilities.
Gordon

Differences between Lightroom and Bridge?

I was just wondering what the difference (if any) is between Adobe Lightroom and Adobe Bridge

Adobe Bridge CC vs. Lightroom 5 - Which is best for you? | Adobe Evangelists - Terry White | Adobe TV

Difference between SONET and GigE from Carrier?

We have just provisioned a carrier to provide us with an OC12 (622mbps) connection. The carrier asked if I wanted a Sonet or GigE handoff? What does the carrier mean by this and is there a difference?

I'm not sure how to answer.
There are significant differences between the SONET and Ethernet technologies. They cannot be connected directly together over a fiber cable. Ethernet is a frame-based computer networking technologies for local area networks (LANs). SONET defines a technology for carrying many signals of different capacities through a synchronous, flexible, optical hierarchy. This is accomplished by means of a byte-interleaved multiplexing scheme.
My assumption on the carrier's side is their transport equipment can accept either a SONET or a GigE interface. He is giving you an option because he understands that to you may be more comfortable working with Ethernet than SONET and that GigE router interfaces are less expensive than SONET router interfaces. To the carrier, it is all just bits that need to be transported from A to B.
The router interface card your choose will take care of getting your data framed properly.
If you request a OC-12 SONET interface from the carrier, you will configure your router with an OC-12 interface. The router interface will take your data and add the SONET overhead/framing and couple it to the fiber to hand-off to the carrier.
If you request a GigE interface from the carrier, you will configure your router with a GigE interface. The router interface will take your data and package it into Ethernet frames and couple it to the fiber to hand-off to the carrier.
Any help?

Color Differences between Lightroom and Premiere Pro

I have been making color adjustments to movie clips in Photoshop or Lightroom (both of which do a great job), but when I bring the clips into Premiere Pro or Premiere Elements the colors are not the same as what I was seing in the other programs. It is as if the programs are using different color profiles. How do I resolve this problem?

bryanbrowne1 wrote:
I have been making color adjustments to movie clips in Photoshop or Lightroom (both of which do a great job), but when I bring the clips into Premiere Pro or Premiere Elements the colors are not the same as what I was seing in the other programs. It is as if the programs are using different color profiles. How do I resolve this problem?
Photoshop and Lightroom are designed for still photography. Still photographers use a color managed workflow that in general ends in a paper print. Since printers/inks/papers can in general display a wider gamut than computer monitors can display, we use tools manage it, such as soft proofing. The efficient way to control this is through ICC profiles of the printer/ink/paper combinations, of which there are thousands. Thus Photoshop and Lightroom and other still photography tools are esentially required to be color managed.
PPro and film/video have decidedly different requirements. The video workflow ends in a light source display (projection, HDTV, or web video, all are light sources, where a pigment ink print is a reflective source, which has entirely different characteristics). These end displays are not variable workspace displays. HDTV displays only in REC.709 workspace, its gamut, contrast, etc. are tightly defined. Web video uses the sRGB workspace. Etc.
I'm just sayin' that still photography and video have very different requirements. Trying to force still photography methods onto a video workflow is bound to be difficult and full of problems, as you have found.
The answer to your "How do I resolve this problem" question is perhaps to use the still photography tools for still photography, and the video tools for video. A stills workflow for stills, and a video workflow for video.
A video workflow implies doing color correction and color grading on external monitors that natively support the target work space (Rec.709 in the case of HDTV, Blu-ray, or DVD output [OK, technically DVD uses SDTV's REC.601 work space, but 709 is "close enough" that you can get by in all but the most critical applications]). IOW, use a production monitor, or at least an HDTV (calibrated of course), to judge final output.
Trying to color correct video on a computer monitor is just asking for trouble. As you well know by now.
A good place to start learning the video way of things when it comes to color correction and grading is Alexis Van Hurkman's Color Correction Handbook. Highly recommended; it answered questions that I didn't know enough to ask yet. Might for you too, IDK.

Colour- strange difference between Lightroom and all other programs/windows

Hello everyone,
I have a strange problem with the colours in Lr. In the program everything looks good, the colours are the ones that i want to achieve, but when i export the pictures as jpeg (srgb), the tumbnails of these pictures seem to be fine (same colours as in Lr). However, when i open the jpeg (eg in picture viewer or in photoshop) all of the colours are different than the ones in Lr or the tumbnails. On a different computer, the jpegs have the same problem.
Any idea how to resolve this problem? Can I change the colour management of Lr itself (not the external editors)?
Thanx@

OK.
From LR in Develop module I press cmd e to create a TIFF to edit in PS CS3. Edit with LR adjustments is selected. After a while the TIFF appears beside the CR2 Canon 5d raw file.
Still in LR flick between the two and the difference is readily apparent. I notice that all the tiff presets are at 0 i.e. in the develop module as I would expect them to be. But the TIFF image looks sharper and in areas of detail less saturated. I think the decrease in saturation is more a side effect of sharpening.
The new TIFF opened in PS looks exactly the same as the TIFF in LR. But both are different from the raw file they were created from as seen from the LR develop module.
In LR I have applied some masking and a moderate amount of sharpening to the CR2 raw file. I do note that applying sharpening in LR does not seem to change anything except the 1:1 and higher mags unless the sharpening is extreme. In other words I think the imnage as displayed at lower magnifications e.g. Fit to screen is not a realistic representation of the overall effect of sharpening, even when rendered on a large monitor (30") wide gamut monitor. If I am right this is a significant problem. I note that BibblePro perviews reflect the effect of sharpening on the overall image more accurately. (So it is possible.)
(FWIW: My preview settings in LR are quality high, 2048 pixels.)
EDIT: Yes I am correct, the images look the same at 1:1 but not at lower magnification. So guess the LR preview rendering machine does not quite match the preview rendered from the newly created TIFF.
Still knowing this does not help, it just means what I see on the screen in LR at lower magnification than 1:1 is not accurate.

Difference between Lightroom and PSE?

I am a long time user of PSE, and I have just been told by a friend about Lightroom. Can someone please help me to understand the difference(s) between these two products?

Let me just add that if you are a PSE user and you feel that PSE meets your needs, then keep using PSE.
If you feel that PSE doesn't quite work for you, that it is a bit constraining, then here are some areas where Lightroom is superior (according to most people), in no particular order
Lightroom is a workflow enhancement tool; handling many photos from a large photo shoot is simplified in LR compared to PSE
Lightroom's "organizer" is a more powerful tool than the PSE Organizer (and in my opinion, LR is less buggy than PSE in this area)
Lightroom has a mapping module, a module to create web pages, a module to create slidehows
Lightroom has built-in capabilities, and also 3rd party plug-ins, which allow better integration with photo sharing sites on the internet
Non-destructive editing
The advantages of PSE include
Face tagging
Much more powerful editing tools

What are the differences between raw and jpeg presets?

Whilst looking at a friends system after a problem I noticed he had 2 sets of presets.One for RAW/DNG and the other set for JPEG/Tiff/PSD etc. He said they 'behave differently'.
I have no idea how to tell what type I have got and would like to know how to tell them apart, and how they behave differently? I shoot mainly RAW and I'm sure really I should know these things!!
Will I also now need a totally new set in order to be compatible with process version 2012 too?
Sorry for sounding so thick!

I'll answer my own question since there were no replies yet. Others may want to know the answers to the same question. Most of my questions are answered on this link:
http://www.videohelp.com/forum/archive/diference-betwen-mov-dv-files-and-dv-file s-t362973.html
Any other comments always appreciated.

[C++] Difference between sideloading and installing from store

Hi.
Can anyone explain me why when I perform sideloading of my application to device everything works fine but if I upload the same package to the Store and download it from there application crashes
That's strange behavior and I'm not able to fix application. I've tried to do some stupid logging to file but with no luck - no answers why it happens.
Does anyone have some idea what I should with such problem?
Thanks

The install folder is not intended to be writable. Instead use the application data folders.
Unfortunately development builds need to install with wider privileges and so the install folder is writable in that environment. See
App data and
Accessing app data with the Windows Runtime for more information on using app data.

Difference between Reconstruction and regular load from PSA

Gurus,
      What is the Difference between Reconstruction and load from PSA into datatarget.I understand that during Reconstruction we are not loaing data from R3.
      I have a cube and there are 3 requests in that.I deleted all the requests went to PSA and selected one of the requests and selected reconstruct from this.I went to cube and I can see this selected request in PSA in the reconstruction requests of cube.I submitted the reconstruction/Insert button there.
      Is this the procedure to do reconstruction.If yes then how is it different from regular load from PSA.
Thanks

If look function wise both are doing samething. But there is difference in data flow, PSA is used as staging area. If we choose at first place to load only to PSA and analyze our load do manual editing if needed and then load to data target in this case ofcourse reconstruct option is not available or we could parrallely or sequencialy load to data target beside laoding into PSA. So now having already have loaded into data target if some how we needed to delete and reload we can reconstruct the request or run normal load from PSA.

What is the main difference between BPEL and ESB

Hi all,
I am making use ESB in my application .Where the my client application calls ESB and inturn the ESB calls the BPEL process .
I want to know the differences between BPEL and ESB,I came to know that ESB can do messaging and routing ,where my BPEL process can also do the same thing .
I came to know form a vendor that ESB is used for connecting to multiple end points ,where as my BPEL process can also do this.
SO what is main purpose of using ESB ?
Cheers,
Kalyan.
Message was edited by:
patti

Hi,
Look for the blog entry dated 1st october 2007.
URL:
http://abhishek-soablog.blogspot.com
Cheers,
Abhi...

Difference between "Export" and "Export form Fact Table" package

Hi experts!
Could you tell me what is the difference between "Export" and "Export form Fact Table" package?
Tkanks
Gabriel

Hi,
Basic difference between Export and Export from Fact Table is
In standard package "Export" : We can perform this function when we are online and we have adequate amount of data to be exported. We can run this package eg: weekly or monthly. Here we use u201CExport Packageu201D to pull the data
And in the administrative package "Export from Fact Table" Mostly it is used to do the backend data loading basically bulk data , also any formula logic has to be implemented on the data in that case we use the administrative package.
Hope this helps.

Is there a difference between Lightroom CC and Lightroom 5.7?

Is there a difference between Lightroom CC and Lightroom 5.7? If so, is the upgrade from Lightoom 5.7 to Lightroom CC for free?

Yes the two programs are different. Lightroom CC has a number of new features added to it. They include HDR and panorama creation, brushes for the graduated filter and the radial filter, face recognition, support for new cameras, just to mention a few. Lightroom CC is a free upgrade for those who have subscribed to the creative cloud plan. Lightroom 6 (the standalone version) is a paid upgrade. The price is $79.

Difference between folder and collection in Lightroom

new to Lightroom - - in organizing, trouble in figure use and difference between folders (and sub folders) and collections.

Folders (and subfolders) represent actual, real folders on a hard drive. Collections are created only virtually within LR and can hold images from across multiple folders or even hard drives. An extension of Collections are Smart Collections that can be built using various metadata criteria and self populate based on the metadata criteria.
So, two very different things, folders are reality, in a physical place, while collections are a LR feature allowing virtual groupings of images chosen by the user.

Difference between Lightroom and JPEG from camera

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for