Difference between logic pro 7 and 8

I'm just wondering if there's a difference between the Logic Studio ($500), and Logic Pro 8..or does Logic Pro 8 simply come within the Logic Studio package? Is there a big difference between Logic Pro 7 and 8? Also, is it worth the $200 upgrade?

Hi,
Logic Studio: Logic Pro 8, Soundtrack Pro and MainStage.
So yes, Logic Pro 8 is part of the 'Logic Studio' package, which also contains the two other apps.
http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/
Take a look at the Logic Pro 8/Logic Studio forum. There are mixed opinions on whether it is worth upgrading yet or not.
Good Luck!
Steve

Similar Messages

  • Is there a difference between Logic Pro and Logic Pro X?

    Maybe this is a stupid question, but is there a difference between Logic Pro and Logic Pro X?
    Already thx!

    Hi
    Short answer: No
    Longer answer:
    Logic Pro X is the latest release version of the DAw known as "Logic Pro". Previous versions were: Logic Pro 9, Logic Pro 8 etc.
    There was also a "Logic Express" (no longer available) which, though similar to Logic Pro, was missing a few features of Logic Pro in it's later versions)
    This might add more details:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_Pro
    CCT
    edit
    AoS wrote similarly
    There you go then :-)

  • Difference between Logic Pro and Logic Express?

    A buddy wants me to show him how to use Logic Express. I'm fairly up on Logic Pro, have used it for years. I'm wondering if I can get a trial version of Express to try out for an hour before embarrassing myself in front of him?
    Or if there is a huge amount of difference in the basic setup?

    There is very little difference, mostly in content (Jampacks, Waveburner, Mainstage..and a few of the high end plugins). Other than that they're functionally identical. same audio engine, you wouldn't know the difference just by looking at them.
    pancenter-

  • What is the difference between logical ROWID and physical ROWID

    hello
    can u please explain the difference between logical ROWID and physical ROWID
    regards,

    from the docs (a 30 sec search)
    Physical rowids store the addresses of rows in ordinary tables (excluding index-organized tables), clustered tables, table partitions and subpartitions, indexes, and index partitions and subpartitions.
    Logical rowids store the addresses of rows in index-organized tables.

  • Difference between Mac Pro and Mac XServer

    Hi,
    I wanted to know if there is any difference between Mac Pro and the Mac XServer - at the OS level? Meaning, if I design an application on Mac Pro would it run seamlessly on XServer or do I need to care about a few things.
    Please advise.
    Thanks,
    Abhishek

    Both Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server are presently at the Tiger 10.4.10 release, with Mac OS X Server having various added pieces and features, and having a few structural and configuration differences.
    * Do both of them support the ipv6 protocol
    Yes; both Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server both offer IPv6.
    * do both of them support LDAP and PAM based authentication
    Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server have LDAP support, yes. Mac OS X Server has LDAP authentication, DNS and a variety of other servers built in. Mac OS X is configured as a client, though there is the Apache web server.
    Haven't looked for PAM for either platform.
    * Do both of them support the same level of Java ( I understand we need 1.5 or higher for Tiger / Leapord)
    Java itself is the same on both Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server, though Mac OS X Server has server-oriented pieces of Java present. And it's still write once, debug everywhere.
    No Leopard questions are permissible here at this time; Leopard details are NDA.
    * Do the compilers (gcc) have different compilation options - maybe xServer uses some better optimized flags that handle large volumes of data and network traffic.
    AFAIK, there are no differences in gcc defaults. Nor would I expect any. Handling volumes of data is left to the programmer. (I'm not even sure how a compiler author would even implement that sort of difference.)
    * Is there any difference in the behavior of the way the libraries ...
    I'd expect the exact same behavior the programmer requested would occur with both platforms.
    Now as for what I expect is the root of your question, yes, you'll likely want to test your application on both Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server software platforms. There can exist very hard to predict details such as cases where dual NICs or the aforementioned directory differences that have tossed a few applications off the rails and into the weeds; have caused applications to fail.
    You can choose to install Mac OS X Server on a Mac Pro. Probably the 10-client, because you probably aren't planning to serve piles of clients from the Mac Pro.
    An overview of Mac OS X Server is here:
    http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/specs.html
    Now as to whether or not I would expect run-time differences, no. But I've been at this way too long and have chased way to many weird bugs to make any promises here.

  • Does Apple allow functionality between Logic Pro and Airport Express

    That's it... Does Apple allow functionality between Logic Pro and Airport Express.
    If not, Why not. It seems like such a logical Apple type solution. I looked and find it difficult to believe nobody has asked the question...

    There is your solution: http://www.rogueamoeba.com/airfoil/

  • Conflict between Logic Pro and external device error in Logic Pro X./cpu problems

    hi Logic users,
    using a MacBookPro 15 inch Retina, 2,7 GHz intel Core i7, 16 GB Ram, OSX 10,8,5, Logic X 10.0.4.
    i am wondering if you can help me out with the following problem i cant solve:
    when starting logic x with a not too big arrangement, lets say using one third to half of cpu, i open u-he plugin Diva and the cpu is going up on full range and the following error appears: "sample-rate 39299 (number always changes) reconized. Check conflict between logic pro x and external device"
    as external device im running a VirusTi and as audio-device Apogge Duet. when dis-connecting both devices, i have the same problem.
    putting the sample buffer up to the highest rate, doesnt change anything.
    same arrangements on friends computers dont show that problem, so it has to be something wrong in my set up.
    anybody has an idea?
    would be much appreciated for your help,
    thanx-

    Have you used Diva's preset Accuracy system to reduce CPU load?
    accuracy
    Click on the Main button at the bottom of the window. To the right of the Master section are two selectors called Accuracy and OfflineAcc. In the current version of Diva these are global parameters i.e. they remain fixed across all presets, per loaded instance:
    draft........CPU-friendly, but FM will sound rough and resonance is primitive i.e. NOT zero delay! fast......... Fine for older computers and/or when you need more polyphony in acceptable quality great...... The best compromise between quality and polyphony on high-power computers divine..... Top-quality zero delay feedback filters... but can your computer can handle it?
    OfflineAcc only has two options – same or best (i.e. divine in the current version).
    Some host applications may have problems rendering to audio at the selected accuracy, but the
    better ones include an “inform plug-ins of offline rendering status” or similar.
    I typically work in draft mode and then switch to Devine or best when freezing the track or bouncing the entire project...

  • Difference between logic $499 and academic $149

    I am currently a UC student and was wondering what is the difference between logic studio $499 and the academic version $149?
    I am planning to get Logic as my main workstation but trying to figure out do i buy the academic version using the advantage of being a student or to buy the $499 one.
    is there a difference?
    Thank You
    [email protected]

    And at 149$, it's a lower price tag than the typical upgrade price for a major Logic revision. So, if you just began your academic years, chances are that you'll still be eligible for the student discount when LP10/LS3 arrives and it will cost you 149$ instead of 199$ to get the new version(if there's no change in Apple pricing at that time). So, buy the academic one, you'll save.

  • Difference Between Logical Screen and Active/Physical Screen

    Hi All,
    Could someone tell me what is the Diffrence Between Logical Screen and Active/Physical Screen and what is the reason for having two screens instead of one.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Joseph Reddy.

    Hi Marilyn,
    Thanks You. I have found the answer to this.
    All,
    If you go to the SPRO>Logistics Execution>Mobile Data Entry-->Define Screen Management. Here you have two screens one is Logical Screen and another actual Screen and a program associated to this.
    Here the Logical Screens are used within the program and Actual screens are the screens which are visible to the User. The Link between Logical and actual screen is present in the table T3130C. Program recognises logical screens.
    Now suppose say certain functionality/create new transaction code for RF Device is not there in SAP and you want to Include/Create your own code in any of the User-Exits. Then you have to rename the actual screen to 9***. So that the system recognises the change in the screen and related User-Exit is executed.
    Hope this is Clear.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Joseph Reddy.

  • Difference between Logic Pro 9 and Logic Studio?

    I have garage band and I notice that the instruments available are extremely limited, so I am looking to upgrade solely for the idea of getting more instruments and more features. Does the app store Logic Pro 9 have the extensive amount of official instruments to download for free? Or are there additional costs if you are looking to purchase the instruments for the app store logic 9?
    I know that the studio version has mainstage, compressor and other programs etc, but what I am looking to find out is if there is a difference between what instruments, resources and materials found in the $210 Logic 9 and the Logic Studio version that you can't download for free from inside Logic 9?
    Thanks

    Hi
    Segall wrote:
    Does the app store Logic Pro 9 have the extensive amount of official instruments to download for free?
    The instruments themselves are embedded within the Logic application, with the exception of the sample libraries for the EXS24 and Ultrabeat. All of the content, including the various Jampacks and sample libraries are available to download
    Segall wrote:
    Or are there additional costs if you are looking to purchase the instruments for the app store logic 9?
    No.... free
    Segall wrote:
    I know that the studio version has mainstage, compressor and other programs etc, but what I am looking to find out is if there is a difference between what instruments, resources and materials found in the $210 Logic 9 and the Logic Studio version that you can't download for free from inside Logic 9?
    The "Studio" DVD's include the now defunct Soundtrack Pro, which had around 20G of loops, beds and sound FX. Some of that material is now available for Final Cut X.
    A few utility programs are also missing (Waveburner etc).
    CCT

  • Difference between Reader, Pro and Preview

    I'm running Leopard 10.5.7 with Preview. I also have Acrobat Reader 9.1 and Acrobat Pro 9.2 installed. What is the difference between the 3 programs? My default when opening PDF's from Safari is Acrobat Pro. I can open PDF's just fine with Pro. But when I launch the Reader it asks me if I want to use that program as the default.
    I also like the ability to use the built-in Preview function because it seems to use less resources (ram) than Acrobat Pro.
    Can someone explain the difference of the 3 programs and what the advantages of one over the other are?
    I create PDF's all the time with In Design and know that with Reader I can't save any changes to the PDF I can only print and read from them.
    Do I even need Reader installed or is this overkill?

    I would say it depends on what (if anything) you need to do when viewing the PDF files in one of those 3 applications.
    Acrobat Pro: Provides useful tools in examining the document as well as making some basic corrections. These tools include Output Preview (color warnings, ink viewing, object inspector) and Preflight.
    Preview: Has some limitations when viewing documents. Most notably, overprinting cannot be simulated but there may be others. Some transparency blending modes are displayed quite as expected either.
    Reader: Lighter weight than Acrobat Pro, but I am not aware of any viewing limitations as compared with Acrobat Pro (and it does support simulating overprinting in viewing)

  • DVD Rendering and Burning: differences between Premiere Pro and Premiere Elements

    I am landscape photogapher and wish to either create slide shows in Premerie or import them to Premiere  from H264 1080 quicktime files generated by Ligthroom 3.  I do not do frame by frame video editing.  My only goal in using Premiere is to be able to render and/or burn DVD's and eventually Bluetooh compatible DVD's for play back on commercial flat panel TV's, e.g., Samsung flat panel dvd's.
    Are the DVD rendering and burning capablity of Pemiere CS5 Pro and Premiere 9 Elements equivalent , i.e, are that both as likely to produce DVD's that render with natural color on commercial flat panel TV's?
    My prior experience is that my Lightroom generated 1080, H264 quicktime movies  have perfectly natural color on Mac LCD and other computer monitors but see very over saturated color on commecial flat panel tv's. 
    Discussions with Adobe tech support folks are contradictory on this matter.

    The main differences between the authoring capabilities (the assembly of DVD/BD, navigation and Menus, plus burning) of Encore (the authoring program, that ships and installs with PrPro) and PrE 9 are:
    1.) Encore is a full-featured authoring program, offering a lot more power and flexibility, but at the expense of having to do it "by hand," where PrE 9 is very limited in the navigation that can be employed, and it uses Menu Sets for that automation. Though PSD's, like the Menus in Encore, they have many special aspects, that must be considered, when doing any customization.
         A.) In Encore, one can create almost all sorts of navigation in the DVD/BD, limited almost exclusively to the limits imposed by the DVD, or BD specs.
         B.) PrE 9 will allow Autoplay, with no Menu, or will automatically create Scene Menus, per the Chapter Markers that you add - and that is ALL. There will      be no Into AV material. No Subtiltes. No supplemental Audio streams. Only linear navigation, or no navigation.
         C.) Menus for Encore are much more easily customized, where there are some major conventions in those from PrE, that MUST be addressed.
    2.) Encore can Burn an Image (ISO) - no Image in PrE, and can Burn a BD to Folder, which cannot be done in PrE - only for DVD.
    3.) Encore offers the capability to adjust Layer Breaks for DL discs.
    4.) Encore allows one to adjust the Burn speed, and in PrE, one is stuck with the "fastest" based on the speed of the media + the burner
    5.) Encore allows output to a Flash delivery with pretty much full navigation.
    6.) Encore allows for changes in the Subpicture Highlight Color Sets, and PrE will only do that, with some Menu Set editing.
    7.) Encore offers a SlideShow feature, but I feel that it is rudimentary and limited, and assemble mine in PrPro, then go to Encore for authoring.
    8.) Encore is a separate program, though interfaces with PrPro with ADL (Adobe Dynamic Link), and is NOT available as a stand-alone any more - only with      PrPro.
    There are probably more differences, and some of the above might not make any difference to you. Things can probably be summed up as: Encore = great power and flexibility, but with things being done manually, and PrE lacks the power and flexibility, but is semi-automatic, so probably easier to use on simple Projects.
    Good luck, and hope this helps you make the decision,
    Hunt
    [Edit] Sorry that some of the formatting for the Outline did not translate well. Gotta' explore the Outline formatting in the editing screen more, 'cause it would probably have fixed things. Sorry about that.

  • Difference between Soundtrack Pro and the version that came with FCE 3.5

    Would like to know what the important differences are between Soundtrack Pro 2 and v1.5 that shipped with Final Cut Express 1.5.

    I would say it depends on what (if anything) you need to do when viewing the PDF files in one of those 3 applications.
    Acrobat Pro: Provides useful tools in examining the document as well as making some basic corrections. These tools include Output Preview (color warnings, ink viewing, object inspector) and Preflight.
    Preview: Has some limitations when viewing documents. Most notably, overprinting cannot be simulated but there may be others. Some transparency blending modes are displayed quite as expected either.
    Reader: Lighter weight than Acrobat Pro, but I am not aware of any viewing limitations as compared with Acrobat Pro (and it does support simulating overprinting in viewing)

  • Swapping songs between Logic Pro and Express-incompatibility?

    We have a bunch of audio tracks that we recorded on Logic Pro 7.1. A musician has Logic express and wants to use the tracks and over dub and then send them back. When we brought the portable drive over, all the songs loaded fine minus plug ins not available. When we hit play though, the CPU overloads on the G5 with Express. We transfered all the songs to the computers hard drive so not to rely on the firewire. Also, it has 2 G of RAM for the processor. If we build the tracks up from the bottom, dragging each audio track in one at a time, then it works. This is a hassle though since it make collaboration tough. Any thoughts on why we are having incompatability issues?
    Dual G5 2.5 2gRAM   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    There is very little difference, mostly in content (Jampacks, Waveburner, Mainstage..and a few of the high end plugins). Other than that they're functionally identical. same audio engine, you wouldn't know the difference just by looking at them.
    pancenter-

  • Difference between Logic Express and Pro? ro

    Is the actual logic part the exact same? Is it that with the Pro you get all the extras? (soundtrack pro, qmaster, logic node, compressor, main stage, wave burner, jam packs). Is that what makes it the "pro" version? Or does the actual Logic app offer more abilities? If so, I can't seem to see much a difference. thanks

    The app itself is indeed the same, but the included content and plug-ins are different.
    This Apple support document details all the differences:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4229
    * Effect plug-ins found only in Logic Studio
    Space Designer (convolution reverb)
    Delay Designer
    Match EQ
    Linear Phase EQ
    Adaptive Limiter
    Multimeter
    Multipressor (Logic Express includes a preset-only version)
    Loopback (Available only within MainStage)
    Binaural Post Processor
    Downmixer
    Multichannel Gain
    Surround Compressor
    ** Instrument plug-ins found only in Logic Studio
    Sculpture Modeling Synthesizer
    EVP88 Vintage Electric Piano
    EVB3 Vintage Tonewheel Organ
    EVD6 Vintage Clav
    Playback (Available only within MainStage)

Maybe you are looking for