Difference between Realtime Data Acqisition and Direct Data Access ?

Hi experts,
What is RDA and DDA and whrere these two are used ?
What is the Difference between Realtime Data Acqisition and Direct Data Access?
Please explain me in a detail manner, i will assign points for ur valuable answers..............

Hi,
Eventhough the aim of the two methods are to report on the latest data, there is a difference in both.
In Realtime Data Acqisition you are loading the data into BW and then reporting on that data from BW Infoproviders.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/777e403566c65de10000000a155106/content.htm
I think you are refering to Virtual providers by the term Direct Data Access. In Direct Data Access you are not loading data into BW. Data is residing in R/3 itself. Your reports will fetch data from R/3 directly. The data is called during execution of a query in the source system.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/23/c0234239f75733e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/13/3e34429692b76be10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/da/5909392a430303e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
JituK

Similar Messages

Difference between batch input method and direct input method in LSMW.

Hi all,
what is difference between batch input method and direct input method in LSMW. are they same?if differences are there tell me with details?

Hi,
Here are few differences bw Batch Input and Direct Inputs methods.
Batch Input: Uses classical BDC approach, but doesn't required an ABAP program to be written to format the BDC DATA. The user has to format the data using predefined structures and store it in a flat file. Yet it is a slower updation method.
Direct Input: Works similar to Batch Input programs. The difference is, instead of processing screens they validate fields and directly load the data into tables using standard function modules. Much faster and suits for large volume of data.
Thanks.
DhanaLakshmi M S

Difference between Oracle Customer Hub and Hyperion Data Relationship Manag

Hi,
I need integrate diferents data bases and eliminate information redundancy. I think Hyperion Data Relationship Management can help me to acomplish with the task. But i know there is another product named Oracle Customer Hub than can help me too.
Does anybody know the difference between this tools?
Which one its the more appropiate for me?
Regards

FCH was a product launched by Oracle to counter Hyperion Financial Management. However, it is not a proven tool. HFM has a very good market standing coupled with its other reporting capabilities. Also, HFM is a industry leader now.
Financial Consolidation Hub will be removed from the Oracle E-Business Suite Component. FCH will not be included with Release 12.1. This is why, customers are advised to move to Hyperion Financial Management.
An automatic migration utility from FCH to HFM has not been implemented. FCH customers who wish to implement Hyperion Financial Management will have to install the application and complete the implementation process manually.

Basic data what is the difference between Version Dependent task and indep

In basic data settings what is the difference between Version Dependent task and version independent task. please give detailed explanation

Hope this link gives you the answer.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c5/e4b7aa453d11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Best regards,
Sudhi

Master Data basis-- difference between a Xportation zone and tariff zone?

What is the difference between a transportation zone and tariff zone, & why would a transportation zone be different from a tariff zone?

What is the difference between a transportation zone and tariff zone, & why would a transportation zone be different from a tariff zone?

Difference between center,edge mmcm and edge direct allignments

What is the difference between center, edge mmcm and edge direct allignments.

Both of these terms are used most often used (but not exclusively) when describing source synchronous interfaces.
Edge Aligned vs. Center Aligned
When a device uses source synchronous communication, be it a device that sends data to an FPGA (an input to the FPGA) or a an FPGA sending data to an external device (an output of the FPGA), the device needs to define and describe the timing relationship between the clock and the data that it is forwarding to the other device. The receiving data needs to know this timing relationship in order to devise a mechanism to capture the data.
The timing relationship can really be just about anything, but two types are common:
Edge Aligned:
This is the simplest for the transmitting device. The device simply generates the forwarded clock and data using the same mechanism. If the sending device is an FPGA, then it uses an internal clock to drive an ODDR that drives the forwarded clock, and uses the same clock to send the forwarded data, either using an IOB flip-flop (SDR) or an ODDR flip-flop (DDR).
Using this mechanism, the timing relationship is often (but not always) described as a skew; i.e. the data will change +/-200ps around the edge/edges of the clock.
Of course, this clock/data timing relationship can rarely be used "as is" by the recieving device, so the receiving device will be responsible for adding some delay or other mechanism to use the forwarded clock to capture the forwarded data (i.e. an MMCM shift or an IDELAY).
Center Aligned:
This is supposed to be the simplest mechanism for the receiver. The transmitter uses some internal structure to place the edges of the forwarded clock in the middle of the forwarded data valid window. In an FPGA (as a transmitter), an internal clock would drive an ODDR for the forwarded clock, but the forwarded data would be driven from either an IOB FF using an inverted clock (SDR) or an ODDR using a clock that is 90 degrees out of phase (DDR). (Or it could be vice versa - the data uses the normal clock, and the forwarded clock uses the inverted or 90 degree clock).
Using this mechanism, the clock/data relationship is often (but not always) defined as a provided setup/hold relationship around the forwarded clock; i.e. the data will be valid 1.5ns before the edge of the clock and remain valid for 1.5ns after the edge of the clock.
The idea is that using this timing relationship, the receiver should be able to use the forwarded clock as is to capture the forwarded data. In general, though, this is rarely true, since most devices don't have an equal required setup and hold time; so the receiver still needs to modify the clock/data relationship to center its required window in the provided window.
MMCM vs. Direct Capture
This is a different concept. Regardless of which alignment is used (edge, center or something in between), the receiver (now we are assuming it is the FPGA doing the reception) needs to implement some clocking mechanism to use the forwarded clock to capture the forwarded data. There are really two styles:
Direct Capture:
The forwarded clock is brought in and goes directly to a clock buffer (either BUFG/BUFH or BUFR/BUFIO), which is used to capture the incoming data. Generally (as I said above), the clock/data timing relationship needs to be changed, and when using this capture mechanism, this can only be accomplished using an IDELAY on the clock or data (or both). When done this way, the clock has a propagation delay through the delay element (the IDELAY)
MMCM Capture:
Here, the forwarded clock is brought in on a clock capable I/O, then through an MMCM and from there to a BUFG or BUFH (with feedback to the MMCM). When done this way, the "common" way of modifying the clock/data timing relationship is by adjusting the phase delay of the MMCM output clock.
There is a subtle but extremely important difference in Vivado (and SDC/XDC) between a propagation delay and a phase delay (or phase shift). It has to do with how the tool determines which clock edge will capture data that is generated by a particular clock edge.
When we use a set_input_delay, we describe to Vivado a data window associated with a particular clock edge. By default, that data window will be captured by the next edge of the clock. The definition of the next edge is different when using these two mechanisms.
When a clock edge is propagated through a delay element, the resulting clock is the same edge. Lets take the example of a 10ns clock (rising at 0ns, falling at 5ns) with a 2ns delay (using an IDELAY) capturing an SDR data. The rising edge at time 0ns will generate a data window. By default, it will be captured by the next clock edge, which is at 10ns. After the 2ns of propagation delay, the internal clock at 12ns will be used to capture the window.
When a clock is phase shifted, a new clock is generated. Using the same example using an MMCM, the output clock of the MMCM rises at 2ns and falls at 7ns (and rises again at 12ns). So, the data window defined by the first rising edge of the input clock (at time 0), will be captured by the next rising edge of the phase shifted clock, which is at 2ns (this 2ns rising edge of the phase shifted clock is the "next" edge after the 0ns edge that generated the data window). This is different than the previous example, where the internal edge at 12ns (not 2ns) would capture the first window.
As a result, the constraints you use to describe the timing relationship (the set_input_delay) needs to be different between these two styles. Its also a bit messy, since the constraints that are correct for an MMCM with 2ns (or even 0.01ns) of phase delay are not correct for an MMCM with 0ns of phase delay (which is a bit icky).
I hope that clears things up!
Avrum

Considering buying refurbished. Is there a big difference between a refurb with an original date this year vs. one from over a year ago??

Considering buying refurbished. Is there a big difference between a refurb with an original date this year vs. one from over a year ago??

MacBook Air, 13", Mid 2013:
On June 10, 2013, Apple released an updated MacBook Air in the same form factor as the 2012 model during the company's Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC). The 11-inch and 13-inch models have a minimum standard 4GB RAM, with a maximum configuration of 8GB. Both models are powered by the Haswell ULT 1.3GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 processors with Turbo Boost up to 2.6GHz and 1.7GHz Dual-Core i7 with Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz option available. Each model has a 128GB configuration and a 256GB configuration available, with the 256GB model being upgradeable to 512GB SSD.
1.3 GHz (Core i5) or 1.7 GHz (Core i7)
MacBook Air, 13", Early 2014:
On April 29, 2014 Apple released an updated MacBook Air featuring faster processors and better battery life. The standard configurations also saw a price drop in most regions.
1.4 GHz (Core i5) or 1.7 GHz (Core i7)
MacBook Pro, 13", Retina, Late 2013:
At the Apple Special Event on October 22, 2013, Apple announced that it had updated the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display. Both versions feature the new Intel Haswell chipset.
2.4 or 2.6 GHz (Core i5) or 2.8 GHz (Core i7)
MacBook Pro, 13", Retina, Mid 2014:
On July 29, 2014 Apple announced updated prices and processors for their Haswell Macbook Pro with Retina Display.
2.6 or 2.8 GHz (Core i5) or 3.0 GHz (Core i7)
I would go for the Pro Retina since the display is much better.

Difference between master, documents, document lines, master data row

Hi,
Can some please explain the difference between master, documents, document lines, master data row?
What is the best optimize development technique in terms of architecture and programming?
When to use it effectively?
Thanks

Hi Juan,
Are you referring to the settings for a user-defined table? If so, these settings are for use with UDOs (User-defined objects). UDOs cannot currently be manipulated by the DI API so setting a user-defined table to anything other than 'No Object' will restrict how you can access this data.
UDOs are really only for user data entry at this time (ie you must use the UI to enter data).
Kind Regards,
Owen

Select Records between Begin Date/Time and End Date/Time

Hi, I need to select records from table GLPCA where the CPUDT and CPUTM are between a START DATE/TIME and END DATE/TIME.
I have the below logic from an SAP Solution, but it doesn't seem to be working right in my opinion. It is picking up records earlier than the date ranges. Can anyone tell me how I might be able to accomplish this? I'm hoping this is an easy one for the ABAPPERs...
Thanks,
START DATE 20091022
START TIME 125736
END DATE 20091022
END TIME 135044
CPUDT 20091022
CPUTM 100257
      SELECT * FROM GLPCA
         WHERE ( CPUDT >= STARTDATE AND ( CPUTM >= STARTTIME OR ( CPUDT <= ENDDATE AND CPUTM <= ENDTIME ) ) ).

Thank you all! I ended up using the following:
SELECT * FROM GLPCA
          WHERE RYEAR IN L_R_RYEAR
            AND ( ( CPUDT = STARTDATE AND CPUTM >= STARTTIME ) OR CPUDT > STARTDATE )
            AND ( ( CPUDT = ENDDATE   AND CPUTM <= ENDTIME )   OR CPUDT < ENDDATE ).
This child was born from the following thread that was found:
update date and time of client record

Difference between jsp:forward sendRedirect and jsp include directive

Am very much confused, please explain me the difference between
jsp:forward sendRedirect and jsp include directive with a suitable example.
I'll be very gratefull. Its very urgent.

One basic difference. The include executes in the .jsp servelet created. The redirect transfers "control" by redirecting the client request to another destination. In other words, the current .jsp is no longer in charge or in the calling chain in any way.

Purchase price difference between SAP R/3 and BWI report

Hi
Purchase price difference between SAP R/3 and BWI report
What is purchase price variance ?, my user is telling that in SAP R/3, purchase price variance 100 and in BWI report it is 200 .
Any other terminologies are there for purchase price variance ?
And any idea wherefrom BWI will take this purchase price variance ?
Thanks In advance

Purchase price variance is he difference in price between the amount paid to the supplier and the planned or standard cost of that item
Request you to check your data first in your Cube/ODS, better would be to check in the data container where the data is first loaded.
Also check if this field is getting directly loaded as 1-to-1 mapping.

Difference between nio-file-manager and nio-memory-manager

Hi,
what's the difference between nio-file-manager and nio-memory-manager? The documentation doesn't really discuss the differences as far as I know. They both use nio to store memory-mapped files don't they? What are the advantages/disadvantages of both?
When to choose the first one and when the second when storing a large amount of data? Can both be used to query data with the Filter API? Are there size limits on both?
Best regards
Jan

Hi Jan,
The difference is that one uses a memory mapped file and one uses direct nio memory (as part of the memory allocated by the JVM process) to store the data. Both allow storing cache data off heap making it possible to store more data with a single cache node (JVM) without long GC pauses.
If you are using a 32 bit JVM, the JVM process will be limited to a total of ~3GB on Windows and 4GB on Linux/Solaris. This includes heap and off heap memory allocation.
Regarding the size limitations for the nio-file manager Please see the following doc for more information.
With the release of 3.5 there is now the idea of a Partitioned backing map which helps create larger (up to 8GB of capacity) for nio storage. Please refer to the following doc.
Both can be used to query data but it should be noted that the indexes will be stored in heap.
hth,
-Dave

Difference between Crsytal Report 2011 and Crystal Report for Enterprise 4

difference between Crystal Report 2011 and Crystal Report for Enterprise 4.0?
I think Crystl Reprt 2011 has more function, is it right?

Hi,
I recently attended a SAP Virtual trianing on SAP Business Objects BI 4.0.
Here are few extracts from that which probably shows some light to you:
SAP Crystal Reports 2011
1. UI and associated processing servers remain the same as CR 2008
2. Incremental update to CR 2008 with a few new features*
3. Continue to provide current CR 2008 functionality as-is for existing customers
SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise 4.0
1. Major update & redesign of the Crystal Reports Designer and associated processing servers
2. Focus on streamlined report design, reporting against BI 4.0 Universe, & reporting against SAP BW data
3. Provide the foundation for all future releases of Crystal Reports
Differences between these two releases:
Data Source & Usage Type                                       General Recommendation
1. SAP BusinessObjects BI 4.0                                        SAP Crystal Reports Relational Universe (UNX) for Enterprise
OLAP Universe (UNX)
2. SAP NetWeaver BW 7 BEx Query (BICS)                    SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise
3. SAP NetWeaver BW 3.5 BEx Query                             SAP Crystal Reports 2011
4. SAP Profitability Cost Management                              SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise through Analysis View
SAP Strategy Management
SAP Budget, Planning and Consolidation
SAP Extended Analytics
5. Platform Driven Alerting                                                SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise
6. Business Views                                                           SAP Crystal Reports 2011
7. Direct RDBMS or OLAP access                                    SAP Crystal Reports 2011
    SAP ERP/ Live Office Content/
    Enterprise search content
Regards
Gowtham

Difference between XI 3.0 and XI 7.0

What is the Difference between XI 3.0 and XI 7.0?
( functionality & architecture wise)

Hi,
There is no new features added in PI7.0, if u have working on XI 3.0, PI7.0 Older versions the features same..
But PI7.1 there is new changes u can find below.....
Integarte SAP & Non-SAP Legacy system
PI 7.1 is based on open, web service enabled standards and
Integrate all SAP and non-SAP, A2A, B2B, BPM, service enabling and BAM
Highlight of enhancement in PI7.1
1) Enterprise Service repository (ESR) contains the design Registry
2) Includes significant high-volume message processing is supported by message processed in a single
Service call
3) Also importantly support for asynchronous messaging based Reliable Messaging (WS-RM) for both
Brokered communication between two systems will be supported in this release.
4) Provide Service Registry benefits based on UDDI 3.0
Enterprise Service Repository
In PI7.1 ES Repository is at the heart of Enterprise SOA
ES Repository is really the master data repository of service objects for Enterprise SOA
It contains the definition & process of services
In ES Repository has two parts, one is the ES Repository and the other being the Services Registry
ES Repository (ESR) is really the master data repository of service objects for Enterprise SOA
Besides service definition the ES Repository also provides you with a central point for finding and
Managing service metadata from different sources, including application deployments - this is
Where the Services Registry comes in. The Services Registry is the UDDI part of the ESR which
Enables service consumers to find services
The SAP XI Integration Repository used by process integration has become the basis of the central Enterprise Service Repository: powering Enterprise SOA and Service Enablement.
Objects in the ES Repository include:
Global Data Types (CCTS based)
Process Component Models
Executable Integration Processes (BPEL)
Integration Scenarios
Service Interfaces (Enterprise Services)
Interface Mappings
Enterprise Services built in the ES Repository
Enterprise Services includes:
Are built using a consistent enterprise model based on: GDTs, Process Components, and Business Objects.
Are based on open standards.
Are mapped to the Service Interface object in the ES Repository.
Global Data Types - Building blocks for Service Interfaces
Defined in the ES Repository
Defined company-wide based on open standards (ISO 15000-5, UN/CEFACT CCTS)
Reusable semantic building blocks for service interfaces and message types
Process Component Models
Drill down from high-level models to service interfaces and operations
Process component architecture models enable SOA governance
Process components expose on enterprise services, which are based on service operations
Web Services Reliable Messaging (WS-RM)
Asynchronous messaging (EO, EOIO) based on open WS standard
Support Business Activity Monitoring (BAM)
Embedded Event Infrastructure: Collecting, pre-filtering and publication of events across SAP and non-SAP systems.
Event handling: cast the local event to an event proxy to send out event messages to event Consumers.
Transaction SWF_BAM for event filtering via filter rules and event handling.
Enhancement for Mapping
Re-usable user defined functions.
Look-up function reads multiple fields.
Synchronous DB RFC lookups: Use graphical function to model look-ups.
Specify mapping parameters at configuration time.
Principle Propagation based on SAML
This feature uses the WS-RM protocol.
The implementation of this feature is based on the open standard SAML and can
be used with backend systems that support the SAML technology.
Forward user context from sender to receiver.
Authorization check in receiving system based on original user.
Support BAM Milestone Modeling (BPEL)
Sub-Process Calls: Integration Process Call,
User Interaction: User Decisions (initially not part of this project, but will be covered as well to draw the complete picture),
Alert Categories
Enhancements for Process Automation
Human interaction:
Integration paradigm (design/ configuration).
Generic user decision.
Language dependent texts for end-user display, enriched with variables.
WS-BPEL 2.0 adoption: Preview and implementation BPEL4People, BPEL-SPE Simple user defined functions can be configured directly in the process.
reward points if helpful...
PrasHanT

Difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0

hi frnds
.what is the difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0?
regards

Hi,
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
Goods receipt
Goods issue
Transfer posting
Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location
Regards
Priyanka.P
AWARD IF HELPFULL

Difference between Realtime Data Acqisition and Direct Data Access ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for