Difference between routing and rate routing

frndz,
Pls tell me the difference routing and rate routing.
regards,
Srini

Dear ,
[Rate Routing:]
1.A routing for whose operations the production quantity and a fixed duration has been defined. Thus the production rate is also defined.
2.Rate routings are used when you plan on a quantity basis, for example in repetitive manufacturing.
3.A rate routing has the same structure as a routing. You can assign a rate routing to a material to be produced. It can have prallel sequences.
[Routing]
1.Routings are used directly in production orders for a material.
2.A routing can be used without restrictions. Some functions from other task list types such as rate routings and inspection plans are also available in routings.
3.As well as a standard sequence a routing can also have parallel and alternative sequences. You can assign a routing to a material to be produced.

Similar Messages

Difference between Routing & Rate Routing

Hi All,
can anyone tell me difference between Routing & Rate Routing? can we use routing for REM? if no, then what will be the effect?
Thanks,
Rinky

Hi Rinky ,
Routing and rate routing are task list in broad manner .
standard task list: Describes the worksteps necessary to produce a material or perform an activity without reference to an order.( that means they are created without reference to order )
Essential objects of a task list are header, operations, material component allocations, production resources/tools and inspection characteristics.
Together with specific dates and quantities, task list data forms an important part of the order.
The following task list types exist in the R/3 System:
routing
reference operation set
rate routing
reference rate routing
inspection plan
maintenance task list
standard network
master recipe
Routing is created with ca01 and rate routing by ca21 .
Routing is used in discrete manufacuting and rate routing in repetitive .
Rate routing generally has only one operation and prod line instead of work centers and operations in routings .
Both routings can be used for scheduling , cosing and capacity planning .
Hope this was helpful answer !
Neal
Edited by: Neal Gibson on Jun 30, 2008 11:46 AM

What's the difference between Routing and Service Callout in ALSB?

I am puzzled by that.
what's the difference between them.
Or what's the situation should use Routing, and that of service callout?

There is little difference between routing and service callout.
Routing is symbolizes the transition of request thread to a response thread starts. (in OSB every invocation of proxy is undertaken by different request and response threads ). So by this definition, there can be only one route node in a pipeline.
Service call out is also used for similar actions as route node , but in pipeline. So service callout can be either in request pipeline (request thread) or in response pipeline (response thread ) . So in a proxy you can have multiple ServiceCallouts but only one route node.
There are some other slight differences.
Manoj

What is the fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?

Hello to all,
After reading several RFCs, guides and HOWTOs I am confused by an apparently trivial question - what is the basic, fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?
I am well aware that - said in a very primitive way - the classful routing does not make use of netmasks and instead uses the address classes while the classless routing utilizes the netmasks and does not evaluate the address classes.
However, already in 1985 the RFC 950 (Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure) stated that the networks can be further subnetted using the network mask. Since then the routers are expected to use network masks in the routing decision process in the precise way they use it nowadays. However, if the routers use network masks they are doing the classless routing, aren't they? Where is then the difference if we used to describe the 80's way of routing as a classful routing? Or was it already the classless routing? The RFCs about CIDR came gradually only in 1992 and 1993.
If somebody could give me an insight into the key difference between classful and classless routing (and perhaps into the Internet history, how was the real routing done then) I would be most grateful.
Thank you a lot!
Regards,
Peter

Hello Mohammed,
I am afraid we still have not understood each other ;) I am not looking for the algorithms used to select the best path. I am well aware of them, both Ford-Bellman and Dijkstra, and about their internals. By the way, these algorithms do not have any influence whether the routing is classful or classless because they deal with metrics, not with masks. For example, a classless EIGRP internally uses a distance-vector algorithm, not a SPF algorithm.
I will try to explain once more what is my problem... There are two terms commonly used but badly defined: the classless routing and classful routing. Originally, I have thought that the classful routing works as follows:
- The routing table consists only of classful destination networks (major nets), metrics and respective gateways. No network masks are stored in the table because we are classful, that is, we use exclusively the route classes and all entries in the routing table are already classful.
- When routing a packet, the router looks at its destination IP address and determines the major net of this IP address (that is, the classful network that this IP address belongs to). Then it looks up the corresponding entry in the routing table and sends the packet to the respective gateway.
I thought that the classful routing works in this way. I won't describe the classless routing - both of us know how do the today's routers select the next hop.
However, in the RFCs 917 and 950 which were published in 1985, long ago before the term 'classless routing' was coined, the network mask was already defined and it was stated how the routers should work with it.
Now I am confused. The terms classless addresses and classless routing were defined sometime in 1990's, therefore I assume that the routing before the invention of classless IP assignment can be in fact described as classful. In other words, I thought that the routing that was commonly used in 1980's did not use netmasks and can be described as classful because the notion of classlessness came first in 1990's. But now I see that netmasks were defined in 1985.
Now where am I wrong? Do I understand the classful routing properly as I described it? Is it correct to talk about routing in that era as classful although the netmasks were already in use? Or was it already the classless routing?
Basically I am trying to understand what was called the classful routing if the classless routing is said to be something different.
Mohammed, I am most grateful to you for your patience and suggestions! Thank you indeed.
Regards,
Peter

Difference between routing and super routing

Dear Members,
I have basic question , can some one point out difference between, routing and super routing.
also provide transaction code for creating super routing.
Thanks
SP

also go through documents created in forum for basic VC setup & super routing.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-25224
Introduction to Variant Configuration with an example model of Routing
It may help you developing understanding on basic's of variant configuration, super routing is one part of it.
Thanks
Ritesh

Exchange rate difference between MIRO and GR/IR

Hi,
Exchange rate difference between MIRO and GR/IR we need to written off as a expense for imported w/off expense and in case of assets we need to post exchange rate difference to exchange fluctuation account. Currently exchange rate difference is accounting under capital work in progress(Asset)instead of exchange fluctuation.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Venkata Suresh

Hi,
At MIRO stage, after entering PO number system will automatically populate the GRN value for selection. Here if you found that invoice value, which you have received from the vendor, is more than the system proposed amount, then you can adjust that diff amount in the GL account tab, which is next to PO reference tab in MIRO.
There enter the exch loss GL account and enter the diff amount.
Thanks,
Srinu.

Difference between ob08 and oc41 Transaction code in Exchange rate

Hi,
Can any one help me out what is the difference between OB08 and Oc41 in transaction code in Exchange rates...
Thanks in Advance
Sivanand

hi Siva,
When foreign currencies are valuated, all the open items that were posted in a foreign currency are valuated. The valuation is based on the individual open items in a foreign currency, that is, each open item in a foreign currency is valuated individually.
The exchange rate table is OB08
AND
OC41 is another transaction to the exchange rate table.
When you try to change you cannt change the rates sometimes.... but u can see the rates displayed.......
Regards
Ranjit Kumar

Difference between standard and actual activity rates

Dear All,
My client is having a process in which while downloading KOB1 the system is giving report of all the process orders wise activities confirmed in that month against some cost center.
Now when i am going into line item it takes me to process order confirmation display where activiies to be confirmed and activities yet to be confirmed are displayed.
After that cost center report S_alr_87013611 is displayed wherein actual rates(quantity ) is displayed for that activities.
Now the system shows difference between actual and standard activities.
The difference is the calculated in excel on the basis of KOB1 report and difference is loaded process order wise on calculation done in excel through LSMW (for transaction KB21n) wherein difference quantity is posted from cost center to process order.
Now client needs automation in the sense that no excel calculation should be done and difference should be posted for that month for each process order in the ratio calculated in excel.
Kindly provide any solutions if any, avaliable in standard or Z development has to be done.
Thanks and Regards,
VLM

Dear AP,
Have you any idea about how in above case Z development is to be done?
Regards,
VLM

Differences between MSFC1 and MSFC2 in Catalyst switches

Hi,
Want to know the differences between MSFC1 and MSFC2 in Catalyst switches.

Hi,
There is not much difference between MSFC1 and MSFC2, the main difference is how the MSFCs send the hardware programming to the PFC. The MSFC1 uses MLS to program the hardware by using the first packet of the traffic. While the MSFC2 uses CEF-based MLS to program the PFC so that the supervisor can make the hardware switching of the packet. NOtice the difference if the MSFC1 needs to see the first packet while the MSFC2, in theory will not need to see a first packet as it uses the CEF routing table to program the PFC2. Now, the kicker, if MSFC2 in sup1A , all this CEF-based MLS is not used since it needs PFC2 to be able to do this. Sup1A does not come with PFC2 only Sup2 comes with PFC2. The MSFCs gives the Cat6K a L3 ability and it's important but the switching performance of the switch depends on the PFC.
Here is a link on MSFC2 data sheet:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_data_sheet09186a00800887fd.html
Please rate helpful posts.

Difference between SIP200 and SIP400

Hello.
Is there anyone who can explain what exactly BIG difference between SIP200 and SIP400 ?
They have same four bays, support almost same wan interface cards.
Please help me : )

Hi,
The difference is mainly speed:
The Cisco 7600 series router is an edge aggregation router, and the SIPs provide a cost-effective solution for customers seeking moderate- to high-port density and line rate services:
•The Cisco 7600 SIP-200 provides WAN edge aggregation through lower-speed and low-density SPAs for network environments requiring regional office connectivity to headquarters, or collapsed LAN/WAN deployment.
•The Cisco 7600 SIP-400 provides higher-speed, high-density link aggregation for network environments requiring leased line and metro aggregation.
•The Cisco 7600 SIP-600 provides a high-speed interface for WANs and metro aggregation.
link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/module_installation_and_configuration_guides_chapter09186a008044013b.html#wp1063979
HTH

What is the main difference between BPEL and ESB

Hi all,
I am making use ESB in my application .Where the my client application calls ESB and inturn the ESB calls the BPEL process .
I want to know the differences between BPEL and ESB,I came to know that ESB can do messaging and routing ,where my BPEL process can also do the same thing .
I came to know form a vendor that ESB is used for connecting to multiple end points ,where as my BPEL process can also do this.
SO what is main purpose of using ESB ?
Cheers,
Kalyan.
Message was edited by:
patti

Hi,
Look for the blog entry dated 1st october 2007.
URL:
http://abhishek-soablog.blogspot.com
Cheers,
Abhi...

Difference between configurable and non configurable finished goods master

Hi
Pl explain the difference between configurable and non configurable finished goods master data.
Thanks
kamala

Hi,
Configurable material are used when you have a large number of combination of parts that go into a product. It means different combinations of the parts for same material. If you maintain a unique material code for each combination , you require a large number of material numbers. KMAT is used in such a case where you maintain just one generic product code. You assign class to this material having all variant characteristics.
A super BOM is maintained for such a material consisting of all possible alternatives. A super routing is also maintained consisting of all possible operations that could be used.
Typically configurable material is used in Made To Order (MTO) environment. However frequently ordered configurations may be planned with a material variant which needs to have a material master record. Thus Material variants may have stock and value. Depending upon characteristic values chosen at sales order entry Sales Order BOM is created. Routing operations are also chosen depending upon which BOM components are assigned to them.
Non configurable materials are like finish, semi finish materials having fixed BOM. A separate/single BOM exits for every finish material.
Revert back for more info.
thanks and regards,
Man

Difference between u2018Workbenchu2019 and u2018Customizeu2019 Transport request.

Hi Experts,
What is the difference between u2018Workbenchu2019 and u2018Customizeu2019 Transport request.
Thanks

Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually

Difference between WRV200 and WRV210

Dear Cisco
Can you tell me the main difference between WRV200 and WRV210.
Another question
The datasheet said that the WRV200 can run SSL VPN, is that rigth???
Cisco WRV200 Wireless-G VPN Router: RangeBooster
Downloads
Cisco WRV200 Wireless-G VPN Router: RangeBooster
Secure Wireless Network Access for Small Offices
Highlights
• IPsec and SSL VPN connectivity on a single device
• Built-in 4-port 10/100 Fast Ethernet switch
• Multiple SSIDs and VLANs provide separate secure networks
• Simple, browser-based configuration
Figure 1. Cisco WRV200 Wireless-G VPN Router: RangeBooster

Do WRV200 support SSL. strange if yes a newer product do not
Highlights
• IPsec and SSL VPN connectivity on a single device
• Built-in 4-port 10/100 Fast Ethernet switch
• Multiple SSIDs and VLANs provide separate secure networks
• Simple, browser-based configuration

Difference between PDS and PPM and which one should be used for SNP /ppds?

Hi Gurus,
Just wanted to know what are the difference between PDS and PPM ?
1. For what industrial products we use PDS and PPM in SNP and PPDS?
2. which one can be refered to clients?
Please let me know it will be really great if anyone let me know the answers
Thanks & Regards,
Raj

Hi Rajkumar,
I have given below the detailed comparative account of PDS Vs PPM. Please copy and put it in an excel sheet in different columns and then read which is easy to understand.
PDS
1. Production Data Structure (PDS) in APO 3.1 & Run Time Object (RTO) in 4.0 and above versions
2. Master Data Object
3. Useful for scenarios where the compoenent has got different validity periods
4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
5. Contains active Master data from iPPE (Integrated Product and Process Engineering) generated from a production version
6. PPDS PDS & SNP PDS can be used as master data for planning
7. Change Management, variant configuration & Phantom assemplies are supported in PDS
8. Sub-contracting in SNP is fully integrated with R/3 is supported in PDS
9. Direct transfer of SNP PDS from R/3 is possible
10.Rapid Planning Matrix can be generated
11. Not possible to maintain PDS directly in APO and can be used only in combination with R/3
12. The transfer of data changes is simpler
13. Not possible to create alternate SNP-PDS in std system for different mode combinations
14. PDS can be automatically generated from two sources ie R/3 and iPPE
PPM:-
1. Production Process Model
2. Master Data Object
3. Cannot be used for scenarios where the component has got different validity period
4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
5. Contains active Master data generated from the combination of routing (BoM & receipe) and production versions
6. PPDS PPM & SNP PPM's can be used as master data for planning
7. Not supported by PPM
8. Not supported by PPM
9. Not possible here. SNP PPMs will be generated via PPDS PPMs
10. Not possible
11. PPMs can be directly created in APO and can be modified without R/3 also.
12. Little Complex when compared to PDS
13. Alternate SNP-PPMs can be easily created
14. PPM can be generated automatically generated only from R/3
PDS is used in industries wherein there are multiple components or assemblies having diffeent production versions whose validity periods are different. PPM is being used typically in process industries, chemical industries. PPM is very simple in its usage and very flexible in operations in terms of modifications at APO level and can be referred to client depending on the business requirement
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

What is exact difference between PPM and PDS

Hi,
can any one prove details of Difference between PPM and PDS
Thanks
suresh

Dear Suresh,
please find below the detailed comparative account of PDS Vs PPM. You can copy and put it in an excel sheet in different columns and then read which is easy to understand.
PDS:
1. Production Data Structure (PDS) in APO 3.1 & Run Time Object (RTO) in 4.0 and above versions
2. Master Data Object
3. Useful for scenarios where the compoenent has got different validity periods
4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
5. Contains active Master data from iPPE (Integrated Product and Process Engineering) generated from a production version
6. PPDS PDS & SNP PDS can be used as master data for planning
7. Change Management, variant configuration & Phantom assemplies are supported in PDS
8. Sub-contracting in SNP is fully integrated with R/3 is supported in PDS
9. Direct transfer of SNP PDS from R/3 is possible
10.Rapid Planning Matrix can be generated
11. Not possible to maintain PDS directly in APO and can be used only in combination with R/3
12. The transfer of data changes is simpler
13. Not possible to create alternate SNP-PDS in std system for different mode combinations
14. PDS can be automatically generated from two sources ie R/3 and iPPE
PPM:
1. Production Process Model
2. Master Data Object
3. Cannot be used for scenarios where the component has got different validity period
4. Used as Master data Basis for Planning in SAP-APO
5. Contains active Master data generated from the combination of routing (BoM & receipe) and production versions
6. PPDS PPM & SNP PPM's can be used as master data for planning
7. Not supported by PPM
8. Not supported by PPM
9. Not possible here. SNP PPMs will be generated via PPDS PPMs
10. Not possible
11. PPMs can be directly created in APO and can be modified without R/3 also.
12. Little Complex when compared to PDS
13. Alternate SNP-PPMs can be easily created
14. PPM can be generated automatically generated only from R/3

Difference between routing and rate routing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for