Difference between Timing in Routing

Dear all,
I want to know exactly how can I define Supvsr Time ,Tech Time,Machin Time ,Schedl Time,idle time & machine time in Routing
Also i want know the difference between them .  Sum of all these times means the actual Mfg time ?
Plz explain with possible example
Ishwar

Hi Iswar,
these 6 values are the standard value parameters that have been customized according to your organization's business requirement and are not standard parameters.
These 6 parameters are used to capture the activities on the workcenter. one or more of these parameters will be used in the formula for capacity requirements(capacity tab in workcenter), for scheduling requirement(Scheduling tab) and for costing.
the total of all may not be the actual mfg time. the supervisor time and the technician time seem to be used for costing the order depending on the time spent by the supervisor and the technician for the order.
total machine time usually consists of setup timeproduction timeteardown time.
you can refer to the BPP documents for the details of your project.

Similar Messages

  • Any speed difference between Apple Wifi Router(air express) and Tp link(or others) wifi router)

    Any speed difference between Apple Wifi Router(air express) and Tp link(or others) wifi router?
    I'm using a tp link router and sometimes it takes a long time delay for my 2 mac computers to connect each other. I don't know this is because of the router compability or the computers.

    Anyone knows?

  • Difference between Firewall and Router

    I can do VPN remote access configuration by using cisco firewall also I can do it using the cisco router by using the SDM program so what is the benefits from using the firewall or all of them are the same?
    I mean it's recommended to use the firewill? if yes, why ?

    Answer-
    1) WE can make Security-Level on Firewall,but router can't
    2) We can make firewall in multiple context(Virtual Firewall) but router can't
    3) We can create SSL VPN on Firewall,but router can't
    4) Whenever a packet inspected by Firewall and another packet comes with same contents then firewall didn't check that packet,
      but router checks all packets.(show connections)
    5) Firewall works as L2 and L3 both, but router only on L3.
    6) Firewall inspects packets on L3 to L7 but router works on L3.
    7) Firewall have Failover,router can't
    8) Whenever we take trace,then firewall cannot comes on picture,but router always shows as a Hop Count.

  • RV042 - What's a practical difference between gateway and router mode

    That´s my scenario, I have a RV042 as gateway  on subnet 192.168.254.0,subnet 192.168.0.0 on the same LAN and  3 vpn tunnels connected GATEWAY TO GATEWAY on subnet 192.168.1.0,192.168.2.0 and 192.168.4.0. I setup 192.168.0.0 as Multiple Subnet on RV042 so now i can ping 192.168.0.0 from RV042 but i can´t do this from clients. What i want to know is What will happen if i change RV042 mode from gateway to router and What do i do to make clients (workstations) on subnet 192.168.254.0 reach clients in subnet 192.168.0.0 .
    Thx
    Everyone

    Gateway mode = RV042 does NAPT (network address & port translation);
    Router mode = RV042 does not do NAPT

  • Difference between 2621 router & 2621xm router?

    What's the difference between a 2621 router and a 2621xm router? Besides the obvious of one being fast at 25k pps (2621) and the other faster at 30k pps (2621xm).   Which one would be better for CCNA security?
    Thanks.

    What's the difference between a 2621 router and a 2621xm router?
    Besides the obvious of one being fast at 25k pps (2621) and the other
    faster at 30k pps (2621xm).   Which one would be better for CCNA
    security? Thanks
    Hi,
    The difference between the c2621 and the c2621XM is that the XM has extra memory (ie XM designation) and xm models are a bit faster, usually 5K pps.Support for voice compare to old 2600's is rich and can be used for voice network.
    Hope to Help !!
    Ganesh.H
    If helpful do rate the post

  • Differences between SR520 and ASA5505?

    Q: What is the feature parity and differences between SR520 Security Router and ASA5505?
    A: [Addis Hallmark]: The SR520 is a secure router that is made for SBCS deployments. It's interfaces, dynamic routing capabilities, CCA support, etc make it a great fit for many customers. The SR520 is much more commonly compared against 87x platforms. The ASA5505 is a security appliance (and a very good one).
    [Luke Lambert]: Basically in order of capabilities (IMHO):
    UC500 - If you want a basic entry level firewall
    SR520 - If your a small office but want some advanced firewall functions e.g. SSL VPN, DMZ, IPS
    ASA - High performance required, large amount of remote users, advanced features/ monitoring required.
    Reasons for ISR (SR520):- Basic FW
    - One device does it all e.g. Need to terminate ADSL w/ Security in one box.
    Reasons for ASA
    - More advanced firewall
    - Ease of configuration of advanced features
    - Better scaling with VPN (more users)
    - Better SSL (Clientless) VPN

    Good info.
    Richard

  • What's the difference between transport route and transport layer

    what's the difference between transport route and transport layer,Can somebody give me some explaination? thks in advance!

    Hi,
    Transport Layer in ABAP Workbench
        The Change and Transport System supports the distribution of development
        work on large projects across multiple SAP Systems.
        The packages in each development system are grouped into one transport
        layer.
        The transport layer determines whether objects are assigned to a local
        or transportable change request.
    Use
        Each of your SAP development systems is assigned a transport layer as
        its standard transport layer. If you use Extended Transport Control, you
        can assign different standard transport layers to certain clients.
        You can define at the most one consolidation target for each SAP System
    and transport layer.
    When you create a package, it is assigned the standard transport layer
    of the SAP System.
    If you want to assign a different transport layer to a package, you
    require the administration authorization for the Change and Transport
    System.
    The objects in a package automatically have the transport attributes
    defined for the corresponding transport layer.
    o   If a consolidation route originating in their SAP System is defined,
         then the objects are assigned to a transportable request, and
         transported into the consolidation target when it is released.
    o   If a consolidation route is not defined, the objects are assigned to
         a local request, and are not transported.
    Customizing settings are not assigned to a package. They have the
    transport attributes of the standard transport layer of the system or
    client.
    It is best to assign a package a standard transport layer for which a
    consolidation route originating in the development system is defined.
    To display and maintain the transport layers and routes, use the
    Transport Management System (transaction STMS).
    Only the system adminstrator can make changes.
    Caution:
         The tables TSYST, DEVL, TWSYS, TASYS are no longer productive as of
         Release 4.0A and cannot be maintained.
    Regards
    Ben

  • What's the difference between Routing and Service Callout in ALSB?

    I am puzzled by that.
    what's the difference between them.
    Or what's the situation should use Routing, and that of service callout?

    There is little difference between routing and service callout.
    Routing is symbolizes the transition of request thread to a response thread starts. (in OSB every invocation of proxy is undertaken by different request and response threads ). So by this definition, there can be only one route node in a pipeline.
    Service call out is also used for similar actions as route node , but in pipeline. So service callout can be either in request pipeline (request thread) or in response pipeline (response thread ) . So in a proxy you can have multiple ServiceCallouts but only one route node.
    There are some other slight differences.
    Manoj

  • Difference between sh ip bgp & sh ip route? BGP tables and main routing table.

    Difference between sh ip bgp & sh ip route?
    sh ip bgp :::: loc-rib ?
    sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes : adj-rib-in.
    sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x recieved-routes : adj-rib-out.
    sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x routes : loc-rib ?
    sh ip route = rib ? if yes does it mean its loc-rib ?
    so in a given router with bgp running, will there be 5 tables (sh ip bgp; adj-rib-in; loc-rib;adj-rib-out; sh ip route) ? if yes where are they saved ?

    sh ip bgp
    shows the BGP table (where are stored info coming from BGP update) 
    sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes 
    shows networks that your router will advertise to a specific neighbor
    sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x recieved-routes 
    shows advertisement received from a specific neighbor;  networks (NLRI) filtered with route-map distribute-list,... are included  (Inbound soft reconfiguration must be enabled)
    sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x routes 
    shows only routes sent by a specific neighbor and not filtered or discarded (i.s accepted)
    sh ip route 
    show routing table; it contains the best route for each network (best is first of all the lowest administrative distance, then the lowest metric)
    Bye,
    enrico.
    PS please rate if useful

  • No difference between using a local variable and a notifier in timed parallel loops?

    The example code "Pass Data With Notifiers.vi" that came with LV 7.1 illustrates using notifiers with parallel loops.  Just looking at two of the loops, the one that generates the sine wave and the one for "User 1", you can change the timing of the two loops and you can change the condition of the "Ignore Previous" status on the "Wait on Notification".  I have a special case of this to consider, where I'm wondering if there's any reason not to use a local variable instead of the notifier:
    Set the delay on the generator portion (which contains the Send Notification) to something very short, say 5 ms.  Set the delay on the User 1 (which contains the Wait on Notification) to something relatively longer, say 200 ms.  Set the Wait on Notification to False.  Now you have a situation where the User 1 loop action is contingent only upon the loop delay time, since each time the loop timer runs the loop there will always be a value in the notifier.  In this case it seems to behave just like the case where you update a local variable in the fast loop and read it in the slow one.
    Is my understanding correct?  Would there be a performance difference between the two methods?  What do you prefer in this situation and why?
    Thanks,
    Hosehead

    Hi H.,
    I think your idea is to write to a Global Variable in the data-producer VI, and read it in the data-consumer VI(?)
    One reason this might be less efficient than using Notifiers is if you want to graph every new value in the "consumer" - or make sure the value read in the consumer has changed at least once since the last loop.
    > since each time the [consumer] loop timer runs the loop there will always be a value in the notifier...
    > Would there be a performance difference between the two methods? 
    If you don't use the Notification "event" to synchronize the producer and consumer, then to be sure the consumer gets a new vaue, you've made the producer loop faster - every 5 ms - a waste of cpu-cycles.  More often the situation is reversed, that is, there's a consumer that needs to see every single new value, and (without events) the consumer must loop faster than the producer (to catch every new value) - this is called polling and it wastes cpu-cycles.
    Just about anytime one's tempted to make a loop execute "fast" to check on some value (or to make sure there's a fresh value,) there's an opportunity to improve performance through synchronization with events (including notifiers, queues, occurrances, semaphores, and rendezvous')
    tbd
    Message Edited by tbd on 07-09-2006 03:51 AM
    "Inside every large program is a small program struggling to get out." (attributed to Tony Hoare)

  • Difference between wait event and timed event

    Hi,
    Anyone has idea that what is the difference between wait events and timed events in Statspack report. I couldn't find it over google.
    Thanks.

    It's 10.2.0.1 on Linux
    (Couldn't do a query, because Linux is inside VM Ware. And it is not being accessed from Base windows machine.)
    Top 5 Timed Events                                                    Avg %Total
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wait Call
    Event Waits Time (s) (ms) Time
    db file scattered read 9,750,617 34,611 4 44.7
    CPU time 14,248 18.4
    read by other session 1,532,282 8,984 6 11.6
    db file sequential read 4,514,494 5,588 1 7.2
    latch: cache buffers lru chain 277,245 4,823 17 6.2
    Wait Events  DB/Inst: ABCD/ABCD  Snaps: 1-2
    -> s - second, cs - centisecond, ms - millisecond, us - microsecond
    -> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
    -> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
    -> ordered by Total Wait Time desc, Waits desc (idle events last)
    Avg
    %Time Total Wait wait Waits
    Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn
    db file scattered read 9,750,617 0 34,611 4 24.2
    read by other session 1,532,282 0 8,984 6 3.8
    db file sequential read 4,514,494 0 5,588 1 11.2
    latch: cache buffers lru chain 277,245 0 4,823 17 0.7
    latch free 121,466 0 3,291 27 0.3
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Differences between "top 5 timed events" and "Top 5 Timed Foreground Events

    Dear all,
    i want to know what is the difference between "top 5 timed events" and "Top 5 Timed Foreground Events" in AWR reports
    the meaning the same is?
    thanks to all.

    chijar wrote:
    Dear all,
    i want to know what is the difference between "top 5 timed events" and "Top 5 Timed Foreground Events" in AWR reports
    the meaning the same is?
    thanks to all.what is the difference between foreground & background sessions?

  • Difference between Routing & Rate Routing

    Hi All,
    can anyone tell me difference between Routing & Rate Routing? can we use routing for REM? if no, then what will be the effect?
    Thanks,
    Rinky

    Hi Rinky ,
                   Routing and rate routing are task list in broad manner .
    standard task list: Describes the worksteps necessary to produce a material or perform an activity without reference to an order.( that means they are created without reference to order )
    Essential objects of a task list are header, operations, material component allocations, production resources/tools and inspection characteristics.
    Together with specific dates and quantities, task list data forms an important part of the order.
    The following task list types exist in the R/3 System:
    routing
    reference operation set
    rate routing
    reference rate routing
    inspection plan
    maintenance task list
    standard network
    master recipe
    Routing is created with ca01 and rate routing by ca21 .
    Routing is used in discrete manufacuting and rate routing in repetitive .
    Rate routing generally has only one operation  and prod line instead of work centers and operations in routings .
    Both routings can be used for scheduling , cosing and capacity planning .
    Hope this was helpful answer !
    Neal
    Edited by: Neal Gibson on Jun 30, 2008 11:46 AM

  • Differences between rate routing and reference rate routings?

    Hello PP members:
    I would like to differences between rate routing and reference rate routings
    Thanks for your time,
    Thanks Again,
    Suren R

    Hi Mr.Suren,
    As explained by other friends Routing is used in Discrete manufacturing and Rate routing is used for REM-Repetitive manufacturing.
    In addional to these types SAP has given 2 more types
    1.Reference operation set -Used in Discrete manufacturing.
    2.Reference rate routing - Used in REM.
    If similar rate routing is been used for producing many materials,then instead of entering(these steps) in rate routing of each  material you create a refrence rate routing and you enter the work centres used and the other details.After saving you get a group counter number showing reference rate routing is saved with group XXXXXXXXX.
    When you are creating rate routing for a material say A ,after giving the name and plant details in the top you will be able to see an icon "copy from" and you can select the radio button for reference rate routing and give the group counter number. or else without giving it here you have got an option to select the reference rate routing after entering into the operation screen also.
    In that particular page in operation overview screen,there will be an icon copy,there you can click that icon and you can give the reference rate routing group counter number and very easily you can create rate routing for N number of material.
    Likewise you can use reference operation set while creating routing for a material in Discrete manufacturing.This basically reduces the time in creating routing or rate routing for materials in Discrete & REM respectively
    CA01,CA02,CA03-Create,Change,display (routing)  respectively.
    CA11,CA12,CA13-Create,Change,Display reference operation set Respectively.
    CA21,CA22,CA23-Create,Change,Display rate routing respectively.
    CA31,CA32,CA33-create,change,display reference rate routing resp.
    I hope this will help you.
    If useful reward your points.
    Thanks & regards
    Karthik.

  • Differences between One Arm and Route modes?

    Hi Guys,
    What are the differences between One Arm and Route modes? Can anyone please explain?
    Krishna

    Hi Krishna,
    Have a look at the two links below. They provide configuration examples for each of the two topologies along with explanation on the different commands used.
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Basic_Load_Balancing_Using_Routed_Mode_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Configuration_Example
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Basic_Load_Balancing_Using_One_Arm_Mode_with_Source_NAT_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Configuration_Example
    I hope this helps
    Daniel

Maybe you are looking for