Difference between Transceive​r Statistics vs. Speed tests

We had been having problems with our DSL speed today.  We discovered (obviously) that most of the problem was that my son was watching Netflix on our TV (through an app directly on the tv, not through a game console), which was sucking up most of our bandwidth.
But, while testing things out, we checked our Transceiver Statistics.  We are getting about 3300 mbps download, but after running two different speed tests (speedtest.net and bandwidthplace.net), it seems we only ever really get about 1.5 - 1.6 mbps.  This was after turning off the Netflix stream, by the way.  This is basically our normal speed.
At any one time, we have 2 laptops and 2 Android phones connected to our network through a Beklin wireless router, as well as a desktop connected to the Belkin router through an ethernet cable.  The tests have been consisten regardless of the number of computers running at the time, as long as they aren't doing anything with a real network load.
I don't think it's a problem with the router, because we can copy files between the computers at about 4 megabytes per second (36 megabits per second).  Althought the WiFi connection says it's running at about 130 megabits per second.  Maybe that's an issue with disk speed, I don't know...
Anyway, is there anything weird going on, or is it a symptom of outside network load that our speed tests are roughly half the value we see on the Transceiver Statistics for the modem?
Here is the full details from our Westell modem Transciver Statistics:
Transceiver Revision: 7.1.254
Vendor ID Code:        4
Line Mode:               G.DMT-Mode
Data Path:               Interleaved
Transceiver Information
Down Stream Path
Up Stream Path
DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec)
3328
512
Margin (db)
7.0
12.0
Line Attenuation (db)
42.0
18.5
Transmit Power (db/Hz)
14.0
11.0
Solved!
Go to Solution.

The transceiver stats only measure the speed of the connection between your DSL Modem/Router and the Central Office Equipment. You can get the full 3mbs downlink speed with losses a lot higher than 42db   I have seen it above 60db and still providing 3mbps.
However the link between your modem and the Central office is only small part of the total path between your computer and whatever internet site you are connecting too. Speed tests measure end to end, as opposed to only a small part of the message path. As a result speed tests almost always show lower performance than transceiver stats.
The best analogy is Verizon effectively only provides the on and off ramps to the Internet Superhighway. Just because the local  ramp is clear is no assurance there aren't traffic jams elsewhere on the highway. The problem with most speed tests is you have no idea how your traffic was actually routed, and what constraints may be placed on it by parts of the network that Verizon has no control over.
The transceiver stats represent the best possible case. The reality is there is no shortage of issues upstream from the central office, either on, or off the Verizon network that can restrict your actual speed to considerably less than 3mbps. It is unlikely that your wiring inside the house is an issue, if it was, you would be seeing a downlink speed at less than 3mbps.
However your uplink speed seems slow. The nominal uplink for the 3mbps tier of DSL service is 768kbps, not 512kbps.

Similar Messages

  • What is the difference between Open-Script and Oracle functional testing

    Hi All,
    Please help me in spotting out the difference between the Openscript and Oracle Functional Testing for Web Application.
    Does Oracle Functional Testing for Web Application have any special features when compared with Open-Script.
    Please help me out.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Nishanth Soundararajan.

    Nishanth
    OFT is the old version of OpenScript, which will no longer be part of ATS as per the next major realize 9.20.
    I would recommend to to spend any time looking at it.
    Regards
    Alex

  • Can anyone explain why there is a difference between BC dashboard statistics vs Google Analytics?

    I monitor Google Analytics for a client and have noticed that there is a factor of 3+ difference between the visitor rates provided by Google Analytics (say 4,000/mth) and BC (say 13,000/mth). Can anyone advise how BC measures a visitor?

    You'd be surprised how many dodgy people target servers all the time.
    Here's the log from a server I deployed 7 days ago which still doesn't have
    a domain pointed to it and it's private server on EC2. I can just imagine
    how much BC servers are getting slammed.
    2014-04-03 03:49:13 HEAD /manager/status
    2014-04-03 10:42:34 HEAD /
    2014-04-03 12:51:25 HEAD /
    2014-04-03 17:34:33 HEAD /manager/status
    2014-04-03 17:36:03 GET /
    2014-04-03 19:00:48 HEAD /
    2014-04-03 20:09:45 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-03 20:09:45 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-03 20:51:42 GET /
    2014-04-04 02:29:38 GET /
    2014-04-04 03:58:14 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-04 03:58:14 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-04 04:21:56 HEAD /
    2014-04-04 19:25:26 GET /
    2014-04-04 19:59:46 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-04 19:59:46 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-05 06:44:57 GET /intl/zh-CN/
    2014-04-05 07:22:23 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-05 07:22:23 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-05 20:33:02 GET /user/soapCaller.bs
    2014-04-05 23:05:43 GET /
    2014-04-06 01:30:08 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-06 01:30:09 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-07 02:11:52 GET /cgi-bin/rtpd.cgi
    2014-04-07 06:24:12 GET /
    2014-04-07 06:24:36 GET /
    2014-04-07 08:32:58 HEAD /
    2014-04-07 08:32:59 GET /
    2014-04-07 21:25:13 GET /
    2014-04-07 21:25:14 GET /robots.txt
    2014-04-08 01:35:40 GET /CFIDE/administrator/enter.cfm
    2014-04-08 04:55:22 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-08 04:55:22 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-08 08:20:50 GET /proxy.txt
    2014-04-08 10:03:07 HEAD /
    2014-04-08 22:23:16 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-08 22:23:16 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-09 08:40:03 GET /
    2014-04-09 12:18:51 GET /
    2014-04-09 12:18:52 GET /robots.txt
    2014-04-09 12:24:47 GET /
    2014-04-09 14:55:59 GET /
    2014-04-09 15:06:26 GET
    /w00tw00t.at.blackhats.romanian.anti-sec:)
    2014-04-09 15:06:26 GET /phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 15:06:27 GET /phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 15:06:28 GET /pma/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 15:06:28 GET /myadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 15:06:29 GET /MyAdmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 16:16:42 HEAD /
    2014-04-09 18:31:33 HEAD /
    2014-04-09 20:12:55 GET /muieblackcat
    2014-04-09 20:13:08 GET /db/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:09 GET /dbadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:12 GET /mysql/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:13 GET /mysqladmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:17 GET /phpadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:18 GET /pma/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:18 GET /web/phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:19 GET /xampp/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:20 GET /web/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:21 GET /php-my-admin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:21 GET /websql/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:34 GET /blog/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:35 GET /cpanelphpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:44 GET /phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:45 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.10.0.0/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:46 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.10.0.1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:47 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.10.0.2/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:47 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.10.0/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:48 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.10.1.0/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:48 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.10.2.0/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:48 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.11.0.0/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:49 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.11.1-all-languages/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:49 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.11.1.0/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:51 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.11.1.1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:51 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.11.1.2/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:52 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.6.1-pl2/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:53 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.6.1-pl3/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:54 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.6.4-pl3/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:54 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.6.4-pl4/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:55 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.6.4-rc1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:55 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.6.5/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:55 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.6.6/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:56 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.6.9/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:56 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.7.0-beta1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:57 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.7.0-pl1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:58 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.7.0-pl2/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:59 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.7.0-rc1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:13:59 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.7.5/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:00 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.7.6/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:01 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.7.7/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:05 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.8.2/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:05 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.8.3/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:08 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.8.5/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:10 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.8.6/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:12 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.8.7/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:15 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.8.9/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:17 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-2.9.0-rc1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:17 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.9.0.1/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:17 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.9.0.2/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:18 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.9.0/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:22 GET /phpMyAdmin-2.9.2/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:29 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-3.0.0.0-all-languages/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:48 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-3.1.2.0-all-languages/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:49 GET
    /phpMyAdmin-3.1.2.0-english/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 20:14:58 GET /phpMyAdmin3/scripts/setup.php
    2014-04-09 22:10:17 GET /admin/assets.txt
    2014-04-10 00:00:17 GET /
    2014-04-10 00:16:24 GET /manager/html
    2014-04-10 00:16:24 GET /manager/html/
    2014-04-10 08:42:45 GET /fastenv
    2014-04-10 10:05:13 HEAD /
    2014-04-10 10:41:58 HEAD /
    2014-04-10 10:41:58 GET /clientaccesspolicy.xml

  • Speed difference between Gen1&2 cf Gen3&4 test result.

    This has probably been noted elsewhere but I just had a chance to do a direct swap of a Gen 1 A1254 and a Gen 3 A1355 (Gen 2 is identical board to Gen 1 and Gen 4 identical to Gen 3).. using exactly the same disk, a 2TB hitachi.. 7200rpm drive.
    The peak speed I could copy a file to the Gen 1 TC was 29MB/s
    Dropping the same disk into the Gen 2 and copying the identical file the peak speed was 58MB/s
    This is irrelevant to people using a TC for wireless .. but just to say, if you get the feeling the old Gen1 is a bit slow.. well it is substantially slower than newer version.
    Just for interest sake.
    And if people are considering upgrading disk in an old TC or buying a new one.

    This has probably been noted elsewhere but I just had a chance to do a direct swap of a Gen 1 A1254 and a Gen 3 A1355 (Gen 2 is identical board to Gen 1 and Gen 4 identical to Gen 3).. using exactly the same disk, a 2TB hitachi.. 7200rpm drive.
    The peak speed I could copy a file to the Gen 1 TC was 29MB/s
    Dropping the same disk into the Gen 2 and copying the identical file the peak speed was 58MB/s
    This is irrelevant to people using a TC for wireless .. but just to say, if you get the feeling the old Gen1 is a bit slow.. well it is substantially slower than newer version.
    Just for interest sake.
    And if people are considering upgrading disk in an old TC or buying a new one.

  • Differences between Issue and Message?

    Hi all,
    Can anyone know the exact difference between issue and message? 
    In testing perspective, which one should we post?
    Regards,
    Vijaya Bhaskar

    Hi Vijaya,
    The difference starts in the concept.
    Issues are meant to handle project problems, like lack of human resources, lack of expertise, go-live strategy decision, that is all problems that are mainly linked to a managerial decision/order and can have impact on business.
    Messages are meant to handle system problems, like printer not working, message error when saving a purchase order, lack of authorizations,etc.
    Because of these differences, also the funcions available for each one and the workflow will be different.
    Hope this could make this more clear to you.
    Regards,
    Val

  • Difference between BT Broadband Speed Test and all...

    I have recently moved to BT Broadband from TalkTalk as I was dissatisfied with the speeds that I was getting with my TalkTalk line – they were OK outside of peak time but woeful in peak time.  With TalkTalk, I was on their ‘up to’  8Mbps which, in practice, translated to about 6Mbps for download outside peak times but dropped to below 1 Mbps in peak (around 500Kbps and sometimes even lower!) – these measurements were taken regularly with both the TalkTalk and Think Broadband speed tests which were usually roughly in agreement and I haven’t had to rely on memory as I downloaded the spreadsheet records available to Think Broadband registered users. 
    I am now posting this in the hope that somebody can explain the difference between the BT Broadband Speed Checker (Here) and all the others available on the web.
    When you are first connected to BT Broadband they warn you that your speeds will vary over the first ten days while they test your line to ascertain optimum speeds for it.  During that time, I checked it every day early, mid-day and evening (usually around 0630, 1230 & 2000 hrs) with Think Broadband and, yes, it did vary – the first day it started at around 1Mbps for download but rose to 10Mbps by the end of the day. On the second day, it rose to a peak of 17.8Mbps which was unbelievably fast to use (well, to me anyway) but never reached that speed again as over the rest of the ‘test period’, the download speed dropped and dropped to the point where I am now outside of the BT test period and consistently seeing only 2 to 2.5Mbps over a 24 hour period.
    I emphasise that those speeds were all recorded using Think Broadband but I am now doing tests using the BT checker mentioned above and the speeds which BT indicate for downloads are consistently in the 14 to 18 Mbps range.  If I do the BT and TB test in quick succession, they generally show the BT calculated speed to be better than that of TB by a factor of around 7 (ie.  TB at 2 Mbps whilst BT show 14Mbps).  Now either they are measuring different things (or the sams things differently) or one of them is lying – all I know is that my general browsing experience is slower outside of peak times and I can tell by the time it takes to load pages. 
    I might have misunderstood something in these tests but I am now beginning to regret that I fell I for the BT sales pitch which promised me ‘up to’ 20 Mbps but ‘more likely’ 17 Mbps.   I have tried to discuss thisl with BT Broadband technical support but they were no use whatsoever – indeed, I got the impression that he was reading from a script and as it didn’t cover my issue, I was wasting my time – it would also have helped for English to be his first language! 
    According to the BT test, I am well within their ‘minimum guaranteed access speed’ (Here).  for my area (about 4Mbps) and therefore cannot do anything about it.  BUT that is only when measured using the BT speed tester – with any other, I am well below.  I am beginning to feel very conned and might even start looking to withdraw from BT if I cannot get this settled.
    Can anybody help.  I will happily post detailed records of my various tests or router stats if they will help.
    Thanks in advance.  

    OK, I have now done all the tests etc. And here are the results:
    ADSL Line Status from HomeHub 3
    Connection Information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    0 days, 00:27:11
    Downstream:
    23.71 Mbps
    Upstream:
    1.176 Mbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Fast
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    3.4 dB / 6.4 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    5.3 dB / 2.1 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    19.4 dBm / 11.6 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    0 / 0
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    41 / 24
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up):
    20 / 7
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    61 / 13
    BT Speed Test Result
    Download Speed:  6.59Mbps
    Acceptable Range:  4Mbps - 21 Mbps
    IP Profile:  21.42Mbps
    Upload Speed:  0.99Mbps
    Upstream IP Profile:  0.83 Mbps
    Think Broadand Speed Test
    Download Speed:  1.8 Mbps
    Upload Speed:  0.9 Mbps
    Uswitch Speed Test
    Dowload Speed:  1.7 Mbps
    Upload Speed:  0.9 Mbps
    For what it's worth, I followed the guidelines for the BT test and took all of the tests within a 10 minute period.
    All I know is that my daytime BT connection is nowhere near as fast as I had from TalkTalk.  Indeed, it was not even quick enough to watch non-HD YouTube videos earlier this morning without freezing to buffer.

  • Why difference between DSL speed tests?

    I have the basic High Speed DSL account that Verizon is representing as being capable of .5 - 1 mbps.  But I've never gotten anything more than 120 kbps download and 35 kbps upload speeds in 'real world' file transfer tests.
    However all the online speed test websites I've used, as well as the one the Verizon repair technician used when he came out here, return results from 750 kbps - 1 Mbps down, and 275 kbps - 400 kbps up.
    I've done my own download speed tests on 3 different PCs via FTP, Bittorrent, and HTTP protocals, and none ever get more than 120 kbps down.  Firewalls can limit transfer rates, but I've shut them all down, and still only get a max of 120 knps down.
    Can anyone explain why there's such a disparity between the speed test results from all these various Inet speed test websites, and my actual real world transfer rates?
    Thx
    ritz

    As an FYI, we used to use a factor of 10 going from bytes to bits rather than a factor of 8. Start bits, stop bits, parity, etc.  I suppose it means less with large frames, but there is still some overhead.

  • AppleScript speed difference between 10.4 & 10.5

    This post is related to a question I posed in March 2009 (https://discussions.apple.com/message/9226100) regarding the speed difference between AppleScript text handling in OS X 10.5 compared with 10.4.11.
    I have recently written a script to search through a text file which is an xml file exported from WorkGroup Manager. The file, which is approximately 1.8 MB, contains all the user names on the school server (just over 1720 of them), their settings and any other information we have added. After adapting some script ideas (using text delimiters and offsets) which I found on the internet to assist with counting the number of users and searching through the information of each one, one at a time, I have a script which works far in excess of my expectations in terms of speed when run under OS X 10.4, but runs slower than molasses in winter under 10.5.
    The script counts the number of accounts, extracts each user's log-in name and also their actual name (which we have entered under a 'general info' or 'comments' field - I can't remember exactly where, but it is stored in the file), makes up a complete list of all account names (with the actual name, if present) and also makes up a subset of this information into a separate list which contains only the log-in names of those whose actual name has not yet been recorded on the server, then saves both lists to separate text files.
    My original attempts, using some rather clumsy text searching and comparison techniques, took about 1-2 minutes to go through the whole procedure. After some internet searching, head-scratching and a bit more more work, the finished script, when run on my G5 under OS X 10.4.11, takes less than 3 seconds to do all I have described above, including the writing to text files. To say I was pleased would be an understatement!
    Because the school/work environment, where the script would be run, is all OS X 10.5 or higher, I thought I should test it out under at least OS X 10.5. The script was developed on my DP 2.5GHz G5 with 8GB RAM running OS X 10.4.11. Using a fresh, clean installation of 10.5 I ran the script and was extremely disappointed. After letting it run for more than 20 minutes and still not finishing, I force quit AppleScript and reduced the number of accounts in the file. 40 accounts took 3 seconds, 60 accounts took 6 seconds, 80 took 11 seconds, 100 took 19 seconds and 120 took 27 seconds. I eventually let the script run right through - total time taken to process 1720 users was 65 minutes, compared to 3 seconds under 10.4.11!
    Given that it was tested on the same Mac, with the same amount of RAM, using the same script and the same original text file, the only variable left (that I can think of) is the change of OS version - 10.4.11 vs 10.5.
    As was pointed out to me in my previous post, AppleScript in OS X 10.5 handles all text as Unicode and has a greater overhead in processing time as a result. I have implemented the various bits of advice offered by respondents to my original post and changed the way I handled lists, etc. Obviously, if the script works so speedily under 10.4.11, I must have done something right in terms of code optimization/efficiency. It's when that exact same script is run under OS X 10.5 that it slows down incredibly. I even tried it on a 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac running 10.5.8 - it still took 40 minutes and Activity Monitor showed CPU usage by Script Editor constantly above 80% (often well above 90%). Saving the script as an application made no difference in the time taken.
    Does anybody have any knowledge about what makes AppleScript Unicode-only text handling so slow? In this case, it is 1300 times slower! Is there any way of coercing/restricting the text handling/parsing to ASCII? If I really have to, I will set up a humble eMac at school with 10.4 on it just to handle large text files quickly with AppleScript, but I would prefer to be able to do it on the normal work Macs which have 10.5 or later on them. As mentioned, under 10.4.11 the script processes the 1.8MB text file with 1720 users and writes results to two files - all within 3 seconds, so I'm not really looking for coding suggestions unless they are directly related to what has changed in AppleScript under OS X 10.5. Without sounding too smug, the script works properly and speedily (at least in 10.4). I really would like to learn about the changes in AppleScript in OS X 10.5 and how to cope with or work around those changes.

    Hi,
    text 3 thru 14 in largeText
    character 3 thru 14 in largeText
    text 3  in largeText
    character 3  in largeText
    These lines will be slow on Leopard
    Getting some text in a variable that contains more than 60000 characters will be slower on Leopard,
    but I don't know why it's slower
    Here a test script.
    script o
        property t_text : ""
    end script
    set a to "abcdefghij"
    set tResult to ""
    repeat with i from 1 to 3
        set o's t_text to a
        repeat (item i of {17, 15, 14}) times
            set o's t_text to o's t_text & o's t_text -- add  characters in the variable
        end repeat
        set StartTime to current date
        -- test
        repeat 20 times
            set b to text 3 thru 14 in o's t_text -- get a text in the variable
        end repeat
        -- end test
        set EndTime to current date
        set TimeTaken to EndTime - StartTime
        set tResult to tResult & " Getting text in the variable which contains " & length of o's t_text & ", (20 times) = " & TimeTaken & " seconds." & return
    end repeat
    tResult
    Here the result on my old G5, 2 x 1.8 GHZ
    Getting text in the variable which contains 1310720 characters, (20 times)  = 50 seconds.
    Getting text in the variable which contains   327680 characters, (20 times)  = 12 seconds.
    Getting text in the variable which contains   163840 characters, (20 times)  =   6 seconds.
    The result on the same machine on Tiger is always less of one second.
    Also, I try with 20 millions characters on Tiger, the result : getting text in the variable which contains 20971520 characters, (20 times)  = 0 seconds.
    The solution ( text item in a list)
    Here the script
    script o
        property my_List : {}
    end script
    set OldDelims to text item delimiters
    set RecordDelimiter to "::::::::::::::"
    set LengthOfRecordDelimiter to length of RecordDelimiter
    set o's my_List to findAll(read (choose file), RecordDelimiter)
    on findAll(str, findString)
        set Oldtid to text item delimiters
        try
            set text item delimiters to findString
            if str does not contain findString then return {"Nothing found"}
            set t to str's text items
            set text item delimiters to Oldtid
            return t
        on error eMsg number eNum
            set text item delimiters to Oldtid
            error "Can't findAll: " & eMsg number eNum
        end try
    end findAll
    set NumberOfrecords to (count o's my_List)
    display dialog "There are " & NumberOfrecords & " accounts."
    set StartTime to current date
    set text item delimiters to ":"
    set FullUserList to {}
    set ListOfUnnamedUsers to {}
    -- first user needs to be done separately as it is not preceded by RecordDelimiter
    set EndOfHeader to "Standard:URL"
    set LengthOfEndOfHeader to length of EndOfHeader
    set EndOfHeaderOffset to the offset of EndOfHeader in (item 1 of o's my_List)
    set OffsetToApply to EndOfHeaderOffset
    set TextBeingChecked to text (OffsetToApply + LengthOfEndOfHeader + 1) thru -1 of (item 1 of o's my_List)
    tell TextBeingChecked to set {UserName, NameForInfo} to {text item 1, text item 7}
    if NameForInfo = "" then set end of ListOfUnnamedUsers to UserName & return
    set end of FullUserList to (UserName & tab & NameForInfo & return)
    -- now do all the others
    repeat with CounterG from 2 to (NumberOfrecords - 1)
        set TextBeingChecked to item CounterG of o's my_List
        tell TextBeingChecked to set {UserName, NameForInfo} to {text item 1, text item 7}
        if NameForInfo = "" then set end of ListOfUnnamedUsers to UserName & return
        set end of FullUserList to (UserName & tab & NameForInfo & return)
    end repeat
    set o's my_List to {}
    set text item delimiters to OldDelims
    -- write results to file
    -- 1). full user list
    set TargetFile1 to (path to desktop folder as string) & "FullUserList1.txt"
    try
        open for access file TargetFile1 with write permission
    on error
        close access file TargetFile1
        open for access file TargetFile1 with write permission
    end try
    set EndTime to current date
    beep
    set InfoToBeWrittenToFile to FullUserList as text
    write InfoToBeWrittenToFile to file TargetFile1
    close access file TargetFile1
    -- 2). list of users without NameForInfo
    set TargetFile2 to (path to desktop folder as string) & "UnnamedUsersList1.txt"
    try
        open for access file TargetFile2 with write permission
    on error
        close access file TargetFile2
        open for access file TargetFile2 with write permission
    end try
    set InfoToBeWrittenToFile to ListOfUnnamedUsers as text
    write InfoToBeWrittenToFile to file TargetFile2
    close access file TargetFile2
    beep 3
    set TimeTaken to EndTime - StartTime
    set TimePerAccount to TimeTaken / NumberOfrecords
    display dialog (NumberOfrecords & " accounts took " & TimeTaken & " seconds." & return & return & "That equals " & TimePerAccount & " seconds per account.") as string

  • Any data on speed differences between 2.4 and 2.93 ghz MBP?

    Has anyone seen any performance tests showing the difference between 2.4 and 2.93 ghz MBP? I've googled around and haven't found anything.

    Check Bare Feats for benchmarks and do some Google searching. Logically, the difference is not likely more than the difference in processor speed, plus or minus.

  • Difference between unit testing and integration testing

    What is the difference between unit testing and integration testing in SAP? Is unit testing takes place in Dev client and integration testing takes place in QA system?
    Please clarify
    thanks

    Hello Krishen,
    unit testing means veryfiingsmall / the smallet pieces of software, while integration testing checks the overall functionality of applications. Within the AS ABAP the tool ECATT + manual tests is used for integration tests and the ABAP Unit language integration for unit testing.
    When, Who, Where tests are carried out is ultimately a personal decision. As unit tests are operate even under heavy development they are often the first choice for developers, but the unit tests can also serve for regression tests over a long period. Integration tests tend too be created and executed in later stages as they require often a certain majurity of the software under test.
    Beside the mentioned links you may check out ABAP Unit infos also in the Wiki.
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/ABAP+Unit
    Best Regards
      Klaus

  • Difference between Testing Message in Integarion Engine and Adapter Engine

    Hi Experts,
    in project, we always test message in runtime workbench>component monitoring>integration engine-->Test Messge
    however, i also find that in  runtime workbench>component monitoring>adapter engine also exists a Test Message tab.
    we don't have access to test messages in this tab, so can anyone tell that what is the difference between testing message in integration engine and adapter engine?
    thanks in advance.

    The usual flow of messages in scenarios which use adapters at both sender and receiver end is as follows
    Sender system -> Adapter Engine -> Integration Engine -> Adapter Engine -> Receiver system
    When you use the testing option in IE, then you are basically posting the message directly to the Integration Engine.
    When you use the testing option in AE, then you are trying to post the message to the adapter engine, which will then forward the message to the Integration Engine. IN this testing, you are also testing the sender adapter also.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kanth Talagana

  • Any speed difference between Apple Wifi Router(air express) and Tp link(or others) wifi router)

    Any speed difference between Apple Wifi Router(air express) and Tp link(or others) wifi router?
    I'm using a tp link router and sometimes it takes a long time delay for my 2 mac computers to connect each other. I don't know this is because of the router compability or the computers.

    Anyone knows?

  • Difference between Oracle Testing Center and Prometric?

    what is the Difference between Oracle Testing Center and Prometric?

    Notes for an Oracle Testing Center are here:
    [http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=51&p_org_id=1001&lang=US#4]
    The cancellation policies are possibly harder than a Standard Testing Center Vendor.
    I would suggest that Oracle Testing Centers possilbly offer exams more on an event or batch basis; (Oracle Openworld is an example; though thats not what one would think of as an Oracle Test Center).
    In general I suspect most people will find it just as easy to take the exam through a prometric(or new testing vendor) center. and there will often typically be more slots available. And the testing center will be typically be examing for other testing suppliers, perhaps mosting microsoft and cisco, but there's a mryiad of others out there as well. So the'll probably be well set up for it.
    Here in the UK (south) we have a fairly (very) dense population. I've used 4 centers myself:
    One 5 miles from me, a college, thats dual Pearson VUE/Prometric; though there only offering Pearson VUE at present until they moved to a bigger suite, with 4 stations. Nice and friendly. 5 days week.
    One 25 miles from me, a training center, that offer dual Pearson VUE/Prometric; 4/8 stations; very friendly, cup of coffe offered; I usually go by Puff Puff to this one.
    One 10 miles from me, maybe a 12 workstation suite, they offer usually prometric (but not oracle) on one a week. Felt Conveyor like compared to other two above; but very friendly and efficient.
    One 35 miles from me, Prometric only including oracle only, maybe a 12 workstation suite, CRT's, and not necessarily of the best quality. This one really felt conveyor like to me, though staff were friendly. This is effectively a drive for me. Also whereas the others I've usd sit one down to sign the forms in a room this one was done at building reception.
    The city center ones can sometimes be a little noisy and earplugs are recommended, though the one city center one I've used has provided them others don't have to.
    In general from once I used a particular center I feel more comfortable; I'll know exactly where it is; where I have have a quick cup of coffee (with sugar) beforehand going over notes. This all helps me to be a little less anxious before the exam. When I get that prepartion wrong, and I certainly did once, if probably cost me maybe 2/3/4 %.
    Getting to know your local test center and routine is one reason why I encourage people to take 1z0-007 and 1z0-051 proctored so they know the procedure and get to know a local Promteric etc Test Center before taking a more advanced and expensive exam.
    Rgds -bigdelboy.
    PS: I expect comments from some people who live 100 (+) miles from a test center and have no alternative choice. And those in some places will probably say they feel they are treated like cattle by the test center.

  • Can anybody explain me difference between test cases and test data

    Hi All,
    Can anybody explain me difference between test cases and test data.
    Testing procedure for FS.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Smitha

    Hi,
    Test case is a procedure how to do the testing of particular functionality and it consists the data that to be given for testing a particular requirement of the given Functional Spec and it also consists the result whether the desired functionality is fullfilling or not.
    Regards
    Pratap

  • Speed difference between comressor 1 & 2

    I've ben working on a contract that requires me to use Compressor (2). I usally set up a batch of 3 timelines (with DVD SP markers) to for a total of 1 hour of content. Using Compressor's setting for 90 min. fast encode on my DP 1 GIG desktop this takes approx 7 hours and on my G4 1.25 laptop it takes 10 hours. A friend did a simillar compression on a single QS 867 mhz with 1.5 GIG of ram and this took 5 hours. Is it possible there is so much difference between Compressor 1 vs. 2?
    Jeff
    G4 DP 1 GIG G4 laptop 1.25   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    Hi Hanumang/ John
    I'm haveing a hard time understanding this myself. The settting I used in Compressor 2 was the fast encode 90 min which is 6.2mbps 1 pass & Dolby 2.0. The compreson I told my friend to use (using Compressor 1) was also a preset This was the 60 min. fast encode @ 6.0mbps. Although his was doing video only, then running the audio through Apack which would only take 20 mins. at most. These are very simple timelines with no effects and jus a few DVD SP markers. If it is a speeed difference of at least 30% my purchase of a MBP 1.83 (for added speed, may not be fully realized when using Compresor.
    Jeff
    G4 DP 1 GIG G4 laptop 1.25, MBP 18   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

Maybe you are looking for

  • Preview corrupted

    My copy of Preview, Version 7.0 (826.4), seems to have been corrupted after a lot of hard use. Preview opens, but when I try to open a jpg file, Preview simply goes off to the spinning disk.  I have tried to replace Preview from the Time Machine copy

  • Need help in backuping list that extends linkedlist

    enum Status {Public,Player,Board} public class Pack extends LinkedList<DominoBone> {      static Pack []Lists = new Pack[4];      static Pack []backupLists = new Pack[4];      private String playerName = "";      boolean myTurn = false;      Status s

  • I have a hp photosmart c4780 and i want to print from my new ipad. is this at all possible?

    I have an HP Photosmart c4780 all in one printer. I know it doesnt have eprint so I installed the HP home and biz app.  Im stuck and cannot figure out how to print from my IPAD.  Is this at all possible?  I just want to print "pages" documents from m

  • Link asset to equipment (serial number) during goods receipt

    Hi all, I want to achieve the following. We are buying for example 10 PC's. When the PC's arrive in the warehouse the Goods Receipt should create a unique serial number for every PC. The qauntity is booked into the warehouse and the costs nedd to be

  • Purchased music gone....again. Please help!

    Ok, here is the deal. I was having troubles with itunes and was forced to re-install it. That went fine, i got all my music back and it works as it should. However, I don't have any of the purchased music anymore..... I can't find anyway to "enable"