Difference between WCF-NetTCP and TCP/IP adapter

What is the difference between WCF-NetTCP and TCP/IP adapter ?
Are both work in the same way or there is any similarity in their working ?
Prakash

Hi Ashwin,
Yes,I am  referring to Codeplex based community adapterhttp://tcpipbz2010.codeplex.com/ for TCP/IP
adapter.
As from your reply ,both adapters can perform the same task .Right ?
Actually I am using socket programming to connect TCP/IP adapter.
Can I do this with WCF-NetTCP adapter ?
Prakash

Similar Messages

  • What is the Difference between AQ adpater and JMS adapter??

    What is the Difference between AQ adpater and JMS adapter in BPEL11g??
    In what scenarios we go for AQ and for what scenarios we go for JMS adapter???

    Go for AQ when using Oracle Advanced Queueing (the database stuff).
    Use JMS when using JMS (in memory of file queues)
    hth,
    Peter Paul

  • Difference between webservices model and adaptive  webservices model

    hi
        Can any one explain me regarding Difference between webservices model and adaptive  webservices model.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    In old WS Model, ithere was no concept of logical destinations.
    There if you are using a WSDL located on a server and if the location of the WSDL
    changes, your application won't run. The deployed application using the WS Model will have trouble finding
    the WSDL. As a result you'll have to again import the
    model. Moreover old WS Model does not have re-import functionality.
    But incase of AWS Model, you can desine logical destinations and even if the location of the WSDL changes, all you have to do is change the new url in the Visual Admin and not import the model again.
    You can visit the following link for more details:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b04308ed-62d5-2910-b3a6-c26771b1c78e
    Regards,
    Nidhi

  • What is the difference between Video-out and mirroring?

    What is the difference between Video-out and mirroring? I can't get iPhone 4 video to work on my TV screen
    I have just bought an MD098ZM/A (Apple 30-pin Digital AV Adapter). I am struggling to get it to show a picture on my TV. I know I'm doing something right because the audio is coming out of my TV speakers but no picture on the TV screen.
    I have used the same HDMI channel (on the TV side) with the same cable and my thunderbolt port (MacBook Air) without any trouble - and on the same app (BBC iPlayer download then full-screen mode).
    Now I note that the packaging for the MD098ZM/A says video-out on iPhone 4 but mirroring only on iPhone 4S. I only have an iPhone 4 (not the 4S). Now if the lack of iPhone 4 support for mirroring means that I can't play video material out to my TV, then in what sense is there any video-out capability at all?
    There is only safety and warranty paperwork in the Apple adapter packaging - no help information. And I haven't found further guidance online either.
    I do note somewhere online that it suggests that basic non-mirroring video-out (for this adapter) only works with some external TV sets. Any way of finding out which? I'm using a Sanyo CE32LD90-B LCD TV if it helps.
    So far not doing very well.

    Now found these but have had to give up on this adapter!
    http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4108

  • Difference between Seeburger FTP and OFTP adapters

    hi,
    Can anybody tell me the difference between Seeburger FTP and OFTP adapters?
    On what basis should one make a business decision as to which adapter to go for?
    Kindly help urgently.
    Regards,
    Loveena

    Hi ! Loveena
    Seeburger EDI Adapter provides an EDI solution on internet via HTTP or AS2 to replace the expensive VAN. It provides some pre-built mappings for IDOC to ANSI X12(810,850,855,856 etc.,) and Idoc to EDIFACT(ORDERS,DESADV,INVOIC etc.,) and has the ability to build your own. These pre-defined mappings transform the IDOC-XML to EDI-XML format.
    Seeburger Adapters are used to Connect the applications which are using Message protocol/Transport protocol as CrossIndustry(payment), VAN, OFTP, AS2(EDIINT), Generic and EDI based applications.
    Re: Seeburger Adapter
    Reg seeburger seeburger
    installation
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=2268965&messageID=3210111
    OFTP ist a communication protocol. This has nothing to do with the format you have to transfer.
    regards the format you have to clear at which standard you have to transfer the messages. This can be any EDI format. At OFTP area the standard are often VDA or ODETTE.
    You can create this messages using different EDI adapters (of course also the mendelson adapter ).
    Regards OFTP you need additional software which handle the transfer based on the OFTP standard. Mostly you also need an ISDN card for using this protocol.
    We can support you with this software for OFTP transport too.
    More info also available at http://www.mendelson-e-c.com/.
    have a look at the ACTIS OFTP Adapter
    Ref: http://www.actis.atosorigin.de/solutions/en/ACTIS_solutions/SAPXI.php
    refer this thread also
    When we need Seeburger AS2 & FTP?
    XI Seeburger adapters
    Adapter for OFTP?!
    Thanks !!

  • Difference between EDN-DB and EDN-JMS implementation

    Experts,
    Looking for a difference between EDN-DB and EDN-JMS implementation. We have EDN implementation going on, where multiple source systems will be publishing business events. Events can be published using SOA Suite or JMS Bridge from AQ and MQ. In this scenario which implementation approach is suited better ?

    Oracle Apps Adapter can be used for many other products other than E-Business Suite (JD Edwards E1, OTM, and others).  The apps adapter was mainly used in ERP systems and was strong when you needed have added functionality other than just polling a db for a status / calling a stored procedure...  It could connect out to other business services, xml gateways and so-on.
    From a technical aspect / development perspective I always thought of that the Oracle Apps Adapter simplifies the development but, may is not flexible. The App Adapter's strength is the services that are difficult to integrate with (business services, xml gateway). If you need to hook in to these types of services, use the APPS adapter. (Again like it is named the "Apps Adapter" its for interacting w/ other applications to enable real-time processing / functionality. 
    That being said the dbAdapter can be very powerful but, like it is named is database focused (to poll some table to know when to kick off other logic and enable real-time functionality through database interaction.
    Looking at the Oracle 12C Roadmap I had heard that there is more planned for the Oracle Apps Adapter moving forward, especially as Anuj said in the "Financial Apps" side of the isle at Oracle. Who knows what is real and what isn't though =]
    Hope this helps!
    -Luke

  • Difference between WS runtime and proxy runtime

    HI,
    I'm new to PI/XI. 1) Could anyone please explain about the real difference between WS runtime and Proxy runtime?
    2) How to configure the scenario's for WS communication and proxy communication?
    3) what is the adapter type we should use for this in ID?
    4) How to convert the proxy to webservice? etc.
    Thanks in adavnce
    Regards,
    Baskaran K

    I'm new to PI/XI.
    I would suggest that you first make use of the Search facility of SDN. If I am not wrong all your questions will be answered by a Search.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Diff between seeberger BIC and AS/2 adapter

    Hi,
    Any one can explain the differences between Seeberger BIC and AS/2 adapters.
    Thanks
    Koteswara Rao

    Hi,
    As explained above ,
    AS2 is Adapter protocol, you can use it AS2 Adapter.But where as BIC is a mapper tool, you can use BIC modules .
    See below links
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/135b0b94-0701-0010-f6a9-86a14057544a
    /people/bla.suranyi/blog/2006/06/08/sap-xi-supports-edifact
    /people/william.li/blog/2006/03/17/how-to-get-started-using-conversion-agent-from-itemfield
    /people/paul.medaille/blog/2005/11/17/more-on-the-sap-conversion-agent-by-itemfield
    http://www.stylusstudio.com/edi/XML_to_X12.html
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b0b355ae-0501-0010-3b83-8f2bb566fa47
    Details on XI EDI adapter from seeburger
    Check this for Conversions-
    /people/bla.suranyi/blog/2006/06/08/sap-xi-supports-edifact
    http://www.seeburger.it/fileadmin/it/pdf/2005_04_sapphire_Ferrero_transcript.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/Butler_Group_SEEBURGER_Technology_Audit.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/AS2_General_Overview.pdf
    SAP Adapters
    EDI with XI
    http://www.seeburger.com
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/SEEBURGER_SAP_Adapter_engl.pdf
    http://www.sap.com/france/company/events/2006/02-01-Automotive-Seeburger.pdf
    http://h41123.www4.hp.com/presentations/ISUG/XISeeBurger.ppt
    http://www.sap.com/asia/company/events/nwtechdays/presentation/australia-slides/Pre-Built_Integration.pdf
    seeburger adapter configuration
    Regards
    Chilla

  • What's the difference between reguler KDE and KDEmod?

    Hello all,
    In two weeks I get my new laptop, which will be capable of running Arch and KDE ( as my current computer isn't, somehow it only runs Fedora w/ Gnome)
    Since I really like Arch and already got it working on Virtualbox, I want to install it on my new laptop. I'd like to get it working with KDE, but I noticed Arch also has KDEmod. I already searched the forums but couldn't really find an answer to my question: What is the difference between regular KDE and KDEmod and which one is better for me to use?
    Thanks in advance!

    Allan, i forgive you for your poor paragraph construction and sorry for me being a bit peeved
    However, i know you have read more from the IRC log than just that one sentence by me...
    Allan wrote:
    From the IRC log, I do not think that conclusion is too far off, especially if you are considering Arch-Stable as your base...  So saying "plain wrong" seems... well...  plain wrong. Especially given the irc log:
    <funkyou> in one sentence: to do what we really want to do, we need a stable platform.
    So why not showing the whole picture and clear this up:
    <funkyou> ok, to start: i think at least some of you have noticed that arch linux is a fine platform for what we want to deliver, but there are some little "annoyances"
    <funkyou> mainly:
    <funkyou> -.so bumps every few weeks
    <funkyou> -the general "freshness"
    <funkyou> -a lot of manual interaction needed (sometimes)
    <funkyou> everyone can see these problems when looking at the forums, _most_ of them are related to updates
    <funkyou> in one sentence: to do what we really want to do, we need a stable platform.
    Makes more sense now? Its not that Arch is too unstable, its just that we cant keep up will all the changes... And this is not Archs "fault" nor anyone elses fault, its just going too fast for us. Most annoying or severe bugs in our tools are there due to upstream updates. And the reasons are not really the .so bumps (which are mostly solved by a simple rebuild) but also constantly changing apis and stuff. This is not a big problem in KDE (they keep their apis clean), but a big one when it comes to other stuff like parted, to give an example. And this is our main problem, we need to constantly adapt our code to upstream changes.
    This even resulted in a repo with modified or "frozen" Arch packages just to keep our liveCD going, and now we are looking for solutions for this problem, and "stable" snapshots seem to be one way... Oh, and if we would do this (there is nothing announced yet), we would do our own snapshot every X months because ArchStable seems to be a dead project. We also considered cooperating with the ArchServer guys, but their stuff is really made for servers, so even while their project is really nice its not really an option for us.
    Well, we'll see what we will do during the next months, now we are still testing and evaluating some solutions... Oh, and people, please stop any "we dont need another ubuntu" complaints...

  • What is the difference between smart forms and scripts.?

    what is the difference between smart forms and scripts.?

    Differences between Smartforms and SAPscript
    a) Multiple page formats are possible in smartforms which is not the case in SAPScripts
    b) It is possible to have a smartform without a main window .
    c) Routines can be written in smartforms tool.
    d) Smartforms generates a function module when activated.
    e) Smartforms can create web enable forms like XML
    f) smartforms itself contine subroutine pools need not to main separetly like in case of scripts
    Request you to refer the following links
    www.sap-img.com/smartforms/smartform-sapscripts.htm
    www.erpgenie.com/abap/smartforms_sapscript.htm
    Sapscript vs Smartforms
    Difference with SMARTFORMS vs. SapScript(SE71)
    The Following are the differences :-
    a) Multiple page formats are possible in smartforms which is not the case in SAPScripts
    b) It is possible to have a smartform without a main window .
    c) Labels cannot be created in smartforms.
    d) Routines can be written in smartforms tool.
    e) Smartforms generates a function module when activated
    Scripts are client dependent whereas smartforms aren't.
    Upto 99 main windows are possible in scripts and only one in smarforms.
    To create multiple main windows in scripts, you just have to give the window type as MAIN whnever you create a window.
    Scripts still exists but smartforms are in use from 4.6c version, now the lastest version of these two is adobe forms
    SAP Smart Forms is introduced in SAP Basis Release 4.6C as the tool for creating and maintaining forms.SAP Smart Forms allow you to execute simple modifications to the form and in the form logic by using simple graphical tools; in 90% of all cases, this won't include any programming effort. Thus, a power user without any programming knowledge can
    configure forms with data from an SAP System for the relevant business processes.
    Advantages of SAP Smart Forms
    SAP Smart Forms have the following advantages:
    1. The adaptation of forms is supported to a large extent by graphic tools for layout and logic, so that no programming knowledge is necessary (at least 90% of all adjustments). Therefore, power user forms can also make configurations for your business processes with data from an SAP system. Consultants are only required in special cases.
    2. Displaying table structures (dynamic framing of texts)
    3. Output of background graphics, for form design in particular the use of templates which were scanned.
    4. Colored output of texts
    5. User-friendly and integrated Form Painter for the graphical design of forms
    6. Graphical Table Painter for drawing tables
    7. Reusing Font and paragraph formats in forms (Smart Styles)
    8. Data interface in XML format (XML for Smart Forms, in short XSF)
    9. Form translation is supported by standard translation tools
    10. Flexible reuse of text modules
    11. HTML output of forms (Basis release 6.10)
    12. Interactive Web forms with input fields, pushbuttons, radio buttons, etc. (Basis-Release 6.10)
    Reward Points if useful.

  • (261680070) Q WWO-13 What are the difference between WLS6.1 and WLS7.0 web services?

    Q<WWO-13> What are the difference between WLS6.1 and WLS7.0 web services?
    A<WWO-13> The differences are huge, so different in fact that 6.1 web services cannot
    be deployed in 7.0. WLS7.0 and Workshop have much greater functionality than the
    limited stateless session (RPC-style) and JMS destination (MSG-style) approach of
    6.1. Workshop web services can interact with any type of EJB, any JMS destination
    as well as other web services and directly accessing databases. The framework for
    building the web service is better and more adaptable and Workshop provides a fully
    integrated develop, deploy, test and debug environment. Additionally, WLS7.0 have
    the capacity to be much better at performance since due to XML parser enhancements
    and the addition of XML maps.

    If you want to take existing WLS6.1 web services and convert them to WLS7.0 you can
    do so quite easily. The WLS7.0 Ant still supports wsgen so you do not need to even
    change your build.xml file. The generated web service however will be implemented
    is a manner compliant with the WLS7.0 environment. More details are at:
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/webServices/anttasks.html#1070576
    "Adam FitzGerald" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    Q<WWO-13> What are the difference between WLS6.1 and WLS7.0 web services?
    A<WWO-13> The differences are huge, so different in fact that 6.1 web services
    cannot
    be deployed in 7.0. WLS7.0 and Workshop have much greater functionality
    than the
    limited stateless session (RPC-style) and JMS destination (MSG-style) approach
    of
    6.1. Workshop web services can interact with any type of EJB, any JMS destination
    as well as other web services and directly accessing databases. The framework
    for
    building the web service is better and more adaptable and Workshop provides
    a fully
    integrated develop, deploy, test and debug environment. Additionally, WLS7.0
    have
    the capacity to be much better at performance since due to XML parser enhancements
    and the addition of XML maps.

  • What is the difference between dropping-connection and reset?

    Hi, Im currently studying HTTP MPF (ASA feature) ,
    im just wondering about the difference between dropping-connection and reset (TCP)
    can you please tell me how it drop and how it reset ? ?? specific process of it ( eg, TCP handshake, etc)
    thanks in advance. !

    Reset sends a tcp response with the rst flag set. Drop sends no response.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Can Anybody explain me the difference between  a Bapi and a webservice?

    Can Anybody explain me the difference between  a Bapi and a webservice?

    Hi Anil,
    <b>BAPI</b>
    BAPI is a library of functions that are released to the public
    as an interface into an existing SAP system from an external
    system.A BAPI function is a function module that
    can be called remotely using the RFC technology
    BAPI are RFC enabled function modules. the difference between RFc and BAPI are business objects. You create business objects and those are then registered in your BOR (Business Object Repository) which can be accessed outside the SAP system by using some other applications (Non-SAP) such as VB or JAVA.
    In this case you only specify the business object and its method from external system in BAPI there is no direct system call. while RFC are direct system call Some BAPIs provide basic functions and can be used for most SAP business object types. These BAPIs should be implemented the same for all business object types. Standardized BAPIs are easier to use and prevent users having to deal with a number of different BAPIs. Whenever possible, a standardized BAPI must be used in preference to an individual BAPI. It is not possible to connect SAP to Non-SAP systems to retrieve data using RFC alone. RFC can acces the SAP from outside only through BAPI and same is for vice versa access.
    <b>Webservice</b>
    In simpler terms, WebService is an application on the Web/Internet. Wheneever Service is requested by the user, it provides the service (i.e Request/Response)
    A web service is a collection of protocols and standards used for exchanging data between applications or systems
    In SAP world, we can expose an application into the Webservice. For e.g We can expose ABAP programs into Webservice.
    XI uses SOAP adapter to communicate with webservices see below...why only soap adpater???
    -> Some remote clients or Web services providers are only able to communicate by means of SOAP messages
    ->SOAP adapter enables you to exchange SOAP message between remote clients and Web Service Servers and the Integration Server.
    -> The SOAP Adapter provides a runtime environment that includes various SOAP components for the processing of SOAP message.
    -> You use the SOAP adapter to connect such systems to the Integration Server directly
    -> The SOAP adapter uses a helper class to instantiate and control these SOAP components
    ->The SOAP adapter receives a msg from the remote client or Web service provider, converts the SOAP protocol into XI msg protocol and then sends the msg to the Integration Server to be processed further.
    Basically  RFCs BAPI are all SAP oriented, Webservices are language / environement independent. So, all one has to do is publish a Webservice and any external system by providing the data in the correct format, can get the approopriate response back.
    see these links to know more abt webservices..
    http://www.webservices.org/
    http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/
    regards
    biplab

  • What is the difference between the $19 and $29 iphone wall charger

    What is the difference between the $19 and $29 iphone wall charger

    Product Information
    This 2-meter USB 2.0 cable connects your iPhone, iPad, or iPod with Lightning connector to your computer's USB port for syncing and charging or to the Apple USB Power Adapter for convenient charging from a wall outlet. 
    Highlights 
    Reversible design
    What's in the Box? 
    Apple Lightning to USB Cable (2 m)$29
    Product Information
    This USB 2.0 cable connects your iPhone, iPad, or iPod with Lightning connector to your computer's USB port for syncing and charging or to the Apple USB Power Adapter for convenient charging from a wall outlet. 
    Highlights 
    Reversible design
    What's in the Box? 
    Apple Lightning to USB Cable
    $19 

  • Difference between Slave reporsitory and Duplicate repository

    Please so kindly, help to explain the following question. Thanks!
    1)Why use the port during Repository creation? Is the port connected to XI?
    2) Who can explain inside what the difference between Slave reporsitory and Duplicate repository?
    Example like below:
    When we create a salve repository named "Test002" that was based on repositorty "Test001" (Port:"2345"), after creation, system shows the port for Test 002 is "2035" in Server level, the question is that how the system define the port? Normally, during repository creation, we have to enter a port by manually, but why, when we create a salve repository, system give us the port randomly.
    3) The same question like above about repository depulication.

    Hi Alfred
    1. I assume you're referring to the port number for a repository. Some of the MDM utilities connect to a repository which is identified by a port number. This is a TCP port number. Each repository on a server must have a unique port, and they ports should be spaced 5 ports apart (i.e. if repository A uses port 2000, then repository B should use port 2005 - 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 can be used by repository A.)
    The port is not connected to XI.
    2. A slave repository is a <b>read-only</b> point-in-time copy of the master. The slave repository / repositories can be refreshed from the master as required. The slave is aware of who its master is. The master-slave scenario is utilised to create redundancy.
    A duplicated repository is simply a copy of a repository. It is not read-only, and has no link to it's "source" repository.
    Port numbers for new repositories are not random - they are calculated, starting from 2000 in increments of 5.
    3. Neither creating a slave nor creating a duplicate repository asks for a port number. The number used in both instances is calculated.
    HTH
    Mark

Maybe you are looking for