Difference between weblogic express and Server

The installers are same as Weblogic Server and Express. There is no differentiator in Server and express. How we can make sure that all the elements in the express component only will be loaded into the memory so that the consumption in the machine resources is less. It seems that it is going to load everything and then the differentiation would be done based on the license. Any Idea ???
Thanks,
Avijit

I understand that the difference is in the license file.
So, the answer is not in e-docs ... right ?
Jin

Similar Messages

Difference between sysout log and server log???

Hi All,
from the long time am trying to find out the difference between sysout log and server log, can anyone please share me the info regarding that?
Thanks.

Server Logs
The server log records information about events such as the startup and shutdown of servers,the deployment of new applications, or the failure of one or more subsystems. The messages include information about the time and date of the event as well as the ID of the user who initiated the event.
Standard output logs
In addition to writing messages to a log file, each server instance prints a subset of its messages to standard out. Usually, standard out is the shell (command prompt) in which you are running the server instance.WebLogic Server administrators and developers configure logging output and filter log messages to troubleshoot errors or to receive notification for specific events.
Regards
Fabian

What is the difference between jsp :include and server side include

what is the difference between jsp :include and server side include(request dispatcher include method)????
i understand that both request dispatcher include method and jsp:include take dynamic data,so when would one use request dispatcher include and when jsp:include.
Is the usage interchangeable?i believe jsp include is used only for jsp/html but include directive can be used to include servlets ,jsp and html....correct me if i m wrong and
do suggest if u hav ny other diff in this context...

The difference really is: in what format do you want your inclusions? If your environment has many Java developers and only a few designers that focus mainly on, say, Flash, that might push you more towards the server-side include() directive. Or, if you have a large set of pages that receive dynamic content that is displayed in a consistent fashion (such as a workflow header area on a page).
If, on the other hand, you have more web designers, there may be a greater desire to deal in markup rather than Java code. Java developers themselves might prefer to view markup (JSP) that more resembles the eventual output than something occuring in Java code.
Finally, there are considerations of tiering. While it is totally possible to (and I have previously) implement 'view classes' that render markup or generate layout templates, JSP's offer, IMO, a subtle, psychological advantage. By forcing a developer to work in a different format, markup versus Java source, the separation on view from controller and model becomes a bit easier. It is still possible to make mistakes, but if a developer at some point notices, "Wait, I'm in a JSP, should I be importing a java.sql class?", then the choice to use JSP includes has paid off in spades.
- Saish

What's the difference between client combo and server combo? Also, what would happen if I install both?

what's the difference between client combo and server combo? Also, what would happen if I install both?

One is for the base version of the Mac OS, the other is for the Server version. You can only install the one that matches your system.

Difference between client proxy and server proxy

hi all,
could u explain me the differences between client proxy and server proxy,
regards,
AVR

Hi AV,
simple search in sdn may answer your question,
There are two type of Proxy's in ABAP and JAVA(Clinet and Server),
Clinet ABAP proxy used to send message from ANY SAP System to Integration server,in this case XI adapter not required .
Server ABAP proxy used to send messages from Intergration server to any SAP System,in this case XI Adapter required.
How to implement ABAP proxy comunication refer below link
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/stage/ABAPproxyproviderimplementationand+testing
The sama way Client JAVA proxy used to send message to Integration sever from any Web Application ,
Server JAVA proxy used to send messages to any destination system ,in both cases XI adapter required.
refer below link
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/7d4db211-0d01-0010-1e8e-9b07fc2113ab&overridelayout=true
Regards,
Raj

Differences between AirPort Express and Extreme?

What are they differences between AirPort Express and Extreme?

You can find all the differences between the AirPort Express and Extreme in this website > http://www.apple.com/compare-wifi-models/

What are the main differences between airport express and extreme?

what are the main differences between the express and extreme base stations.

In addition to Bob Timmons' link the main differences are as follows:
Extreme has a slightly more powerful antenna (might not be true but from experience it seems to be)
Extreme has USB HDD sharing
Express has AirPlay
Extreme has 3 Gigabit ports (don't be confused by Apple's page. Apple states 4 including WAN, 3 without WAN)
Express is smaller
Express has 10/100 Ethernet whereas Extreme has Gigabit

What are the main differences between Signal Express and Labview?

National Instruments provides a matrix so one can quickly compare the
various versions of Labview but no comparison of Signal Express with
Labview. Hence how does Signal Express compare with Labview? What
are some of the things one can do with Labview one can't do with
Signal Express?
Howard

hrh1818 wrote: Which version of Labview are you referring to? I don't consider the graphical version of Labview to be a full featured programming language. LabWindows/CVI is by a long shot a lot closer to being a full featured programming language than the graphical version of Labview.
Howard,
You clearly don't know what you are talking about. There is no "graphical version" of LabVIEW, there is just LabVIEW. Click on the article "Is LabVIEW a general purpose programming language?" written by the Jeff K. for some easy reading from a few years ago. It is all still true (except that object oriented features and recursion have been added in recent versions).
One of the main points at this years NI-week was the discussion of how processor development is switching more and more to multicore designs to improve performance because a simple boost in clock frequency is becoming more difficult. Linear, text based code is not well suited to take advantage of multticore design, while the dataflow based LabVIEW programming language automatically scales well to multiple processor cores, without any need to rewrite older code. I would say that only LabVIEW is futureproof in this respect. LabVIEW programmers are not wimps that are simply too stupid to write text based code. LabVIEW is not a toy language for people that don't want to learn a "real" programming language.
LabVIEW is arguably the best programming language in terms of getting things done! I've never felt limited with LabVIEW and my programs often don't even have anything to do with data acquisition or instrument control. The difference between text based code vs. LabVIEW is like "DOS vs. Windows", "Radio vs. HD television". "Trilobyte vs. Homo sapiens" (sorry Putnam ). Text based code is monochrome, archaic and outdated and its linearity imposes unecessary constraints on the programmer that can only be (partially) overcome by wasting even more time throwing even more code at it.
Sure, a seasoned text based programmer will initially have problems adapting to LabVIEW, just because you would need to adapt to and embrace the power of dataflow and not try to make a literal translation of the text code to LabVIEW, retaining old habits. If you get stuck, come back and ask here in the forum.
You were looking for object oriented features and failed. All you need to do is a quick site search. All the information is out there. Just because you cannot find it in the first five sentences of the glossy brochure does not mean it does not exist. Maybe you want to read one of the application notes such as:
LabVIEW Object-Oriented Programming: The Decisions Behind the Design
In general, you should avoid judgement until you have all information. Your opinions seem quite biased and superficial and not really based on hard facts.
Initially you asked about the difference between signal express and LabVIEW.
hrh1818 wrote:
> What kind of measurments do you want to do and what kind of requirements do you have?
> You can also see for yourself and download evaluation version of both.
No thanks, there has to be a better way to get an answer to my
question than get involved in a two month study project.
If you would answer the first question quoted above, we could certainly help you with the decision. Isn't that the main purpose of this thread?
You can also contact your local LabVIEW Field Engineer to go over your requirements and help you make a decision. They usually know their stuff!
Message Edited by altenbach on 09-02-2007 11:51 PM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Difference Between Airport Express and Extreme?

What may I ask, is the difference between the Airport Extreme and the Airport Express? And why is there a price difference between them. And would I be able to use it for surfing the web and print wirelessly on my Macbook? Which would be worth it for me, Because I'm sorta on a tight budget...

That page does not explain what I think is the most significant feature difference. The Extreme has two Cat5 (Ethernet) sockets (abelled LAN and WAN) whereas the Express has only one (which serves as LAN or WAN depending on its configuration).
If your ISP allows you only one IP address per account, you need a router with NAT to serve multiple computers. Both Extreme and Express have a router with NAT inside.
With an Express, the Cat 5 cable socket is used up with the WAN (modem) input, so all your computers on the LAN must connect wirelessly. There would be no Cat 5 cable for the LAN.
With an Extreme, however, your local computers may connect either wirelessly or via the LAN Cat 5 cable socket (through hubs as necessary).
So, if you wish to add a Mac Book, say, to an installation that has one non-airport computer connected directly to the (Cable or DSL) modem, and the ISP will not serve more than one IP, you can connect an Extreme's WAN port to the modem and configure it translate that one IP via NAT to serve multiple local IP addresses on the LAN. Then you connect your non-airport computer to the Extreme's LAN port. Your Mac Book can then connect either wirelessly or also (with a hub) via the Ethernet LAN. You can't do this with an Express.
A secondary feature difference is that the Express supports AirTunes to drive a mini stereo audio output socket on the case of the Express. It also supplies digital audio via optical fiber through the same socket. Either of these allows iTunes to play over your house stereo system wirelessly. You can't do this with an Extreme.
--Gil
12 inch PB G4 w/20 inch Flat Plane Array Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Difference Between Application Express and XE

Hello
I am new and would like to know what is the difference between Application Express(Apex) and XE?
Is XE a standalone version and Apex is more like an enterprise editiion?
Thanks

read on http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/html/apex_and_xe.html
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition (Oracle Database XE) includes Oracle Application Express (Oracle APEX) release 2.1, a declarative, graphical development environment for creating database-centric Web applications. Oracle APEX is installed in Oracle Database XE as the primary tool for managing the database and building Web-based applications. The majority of the administration tasks of Oracle Database 10g Express Edition can be performed using the administrative features of Oracle APEX, such as monitor database activity and manage database users, storage, memory and database objects. The simple Web-based interface enables users with minimum Oracle experience to easily manage the database. Application Express is pre-installed and fully configured, and it is immediately available after installation of Oracle Database 10g Express Edition.
Is XE a standalone version and Apex is more like an enterprise editiion?XE is oracle database (free) it for test or using on limit (to 4GB of user data, use up to 1GB of memory, and use one CPU on the host machine)
APEX is application (Web) can integrate on Oracle Database Enterprise, Standard and .... RAC
Edited by: Surachart (HunterX) on Jun 15, 2009 6:03 PM

What is the difference between AirPort Express and AirPort Extreme?

Hi everybody!
Here is my question: I'd like to get a portable (Mac of course) and I don't know which type of WiFi base I should buy, Express or Extreme? What is the difference between them?
Thank you.
Goldor

Hello Goldor - sorry you've had to wait!
The Airport Extreme Base Station and Airport Express are really quite different in what they are intended to do. Airport Express without a base station or modem/router already installed has limited function; it's really an add-on. So if you are starting from scratch you will first of all need a fully functional base station to connect you wirelessly to the internet. Once you have set up your network you can use an Airport Express to add functionality in several ways. The best plan is to visit the online AppleStore and read about the products there.
However it should be pointed out that you don't HAVE to choose an Airport Express base station, it's only Apple's take on the technology and there are many more around (and a lot cheaper too!). Netgear, Linksys, Buffalo all make popular wireless products which will work happily with the Mac.

What's the difference between airport express and airport extreme?

airport express and airport extreme? whats the difference??

http://store.apple.com/ca_epp_5000967/product/MC414/airport-express-base-station
http://store.apple.com/ca_epp_5000967/product/MD031AM/A/airport-extreme-base-sta tion

Differences Between Weblogic 10 and Weblogic 11g

Hi,
I like to know the differnces b/w Weblogic 10 and Weblogic 11g, can someone provide those information.
your help will be highly appriciated!!
Regards,
Sarath

Here is a list that I understand as critical/major differences:
1. JDK has changed from 1.5 to 1.6 (WLS10.0 uses JDK 1.5 and WLS10.3 uses JDK 1.6)
2. Console has been improved with great improvements in performance and when it is deployed
3. WLS10.3 is fully JEE5.0 EJB compliant while WLS10.0 is only JEE5.0 Entity bean compliant
4. New deployment features like fast-swap and on-demand
5. WLDF enhancements
6. ASML2.0 support was introduced in 10.3 in terms of Security enhancements
7. JDBC4.0 supportability
AND a lot more (but the above are more significant to me)
(This is not a comprehensive list of all the differences)
Arun

Time difference between local time and server time

Hi Guys,
I am currently experiencing a time difference of 40 minutes between the local time and the current server time.
The local time seems to be 40 minutes slower than my current time.
Path for Local Time : CMC -> home -> servers -> input.file repository sever -> metrics tab. (Under the category of Installed on machine peacok, there is a local time.
Question is how can i sync the local time with my current server time?
Let me know if more info is required.
Rgds
Collin

Hi Collin,
Under CMC >Home >Input FRS , the local time shown is current time of BO Server.
Since CMC is web-based, any date, time value will be coming from BO Server box.
u2022     In case your system and BO server is in same time zone then update the date-time of BO Server
u2022     In case your system and BO server is in different time zone then check with IT team to figure out the BO Server will be maintained in which time zone.
u2022     If current requirement is specific to some report then you can add 40 min in all date value in report to get the desired result.
Thanks,
Sushil

Differences between Pro, Express and Studio

Basically I'm looking for a version of Logic that has simple instrument plug-ins like trumpet and trombone (not trpt section, etc.).
I usually just to Rewire with Reason if Express doesn't have what I'm looking for.
But I'm considering just getting Pro- does that have a lot more instruments?
Thanks

"Is there someone who has worked and has a good knowledge of adobe and can compare it with FCS?"
You don't seem to have an answer from anyone on this. All I can offer is that I used Premiere Elements extensively for years (up until a year ago) and with each new version I found it increasingly unstable. I stopped at 7.0 and apparently 8.0 is causing lots of frustration. Having heard so much about FCE I ditched PC based editing (prior to Elements I'd used Pinnacle Studio for a few years) and now I'm using an iMac and FCE.
In my experience this combination is incomparably more stable and powerful. There are so many examples of this but two that spring to mind are the selective cut and paste ("Paste Attributes") which is so crude and simple in Elements that it requires detailed planning in case you need to backout and the second is that, incredibly, in Elements you can't cut and paste a clip between projects/sequences. In fact Elements doesn't even have the Sequence concept: every timeline is a separate project and to copy a few edited clips from one project to another you have to export an AVI of them!
On the other hand, for slow motion I liked being able to simply stretch a clip between, say, two others instead of having to guess/calculate as one does with FCE. But that's relatively minor and as each day goes past I'm increasingly happy with my decision to go with FCE.

Difference between weblogic express and Server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for