Difference in amount figure between FBL1n and f-44

Hello All,
I am facing an issue wherein We have posted an Accounting Document of type SA against  a vendor for 22582754.02 USD amount.
When we see this document using FBL1n t-code we see the invoiced amount of 22582754.02 USD in the Document.
But when we try to clear the document using F-44 the amount against the above mentioned document is showing as incorrect that is of 23,171,942.92 USD.
FBL1N:
Document number 1000 shows for 22,582,754.02
Docuemnt Number 1001 shows for 22,582,754.02
F-44:
Document number 1000 shows for 23,171,942.92 (different amount)**
Docuemnt Number 1001 shows for 22,582,754.02
I wnat to clear Document number 1000 and 1001 using F-44 tcode
Please suggest what could be the possible reason for this discrepancy in amount

Hi Nitin
Check for any partial payments already made for this document
the payment document would have 1000 in inv ref field
Also check this
go to t-code FB00 > Open items tab
uncheck "include invoice reference" if it is checked, then re-check your document in t-44
Regards
Sach!n

Similar Messages

  • Difference in the Balance between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Curr

    Hi,
    When i am trying to match the Balances between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Currency for the Period 8, we are getting the difference, The reconcilliaton Account was changed on 30.08.2010.
    Please help Us in tracing the differences between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Currency.
    What could be the possible reasons for the differences..
    Thanks

    Hi Varshani,
    Please use the program/report SAPF070 to compare or reconcile your AR with GL balances. You can use SAPF071 to correct any inconsistencies. Provided below documentation for these programs.
    SAPF070  - Compare Documents and Account Transaction Figures
    Description
    This program compares debit and credit transaction figures in customer, vendor, and G/L accounts with the debit and credit totals from documents posted in the corresponding posting period (accounting reconciliation). The sales totals are also compared for customer and vendor accounts. There is no separate comparison for special G/L transactions.
    A comparison for G/L accounts can be made in company code currency and in parallel currencies (such as group currency). A comparison for customer and vendor accounts can only be made in company code currency.
    After the program has finished, a message is issued to the user that started the program. This message summarizes the results of the reconciliation.
    Output
    The program compares the totals of an account on a periodic basis. If the debit and credit total differs between account and documents, the account is printed with the debit and credit totals and the difference.
    Differences in G/L accounts are shown per transaction currency. The first line shows the amount in local currency, the second line shows the amounts in transaction currency.
    If a document which falls within the selection range is posted during the program run, the program is terminated since a reliable result can no longer be delivered.
    SAPF071 - Adjust Balances after Comparing Documents/Transaction Figures
    Description
    If a financial accounting comparative analysis (SAPF190) or a comparison of documents and transaction figures (SAPF070) shows that there are differences between documents and transaction figures, you can use this program to make an adjustment. The documents form the basis for this adjustment. The program adjusts the (redundant) transaction figures, which are only totals of amounts from documents.
    Requirements
    All of the following listed requirements must be fulfilled:
    1. A financial accounting comparative analysis (SAPF190) or a comparison of documents and transaction figures (SAPF070) must be made, and differences must be found between documents and transaction figures.
    2. There must not be any inconsistent documents found. These are listed in both SAPF070 and SAPF190 as well as in this program.
    3. There cannot be any problems in the other modules. Caution: You have to check this yourself. Financial Accounting may be correct but the other modules may not be, and this will adversely affect the program run.
    4. You can only make the adjustment in the ledgers which are compared by program SAPF070. This is ledger 00 or a user-defined ledger for all parallel local currencies except the group currency. (The program displays these ledgers). You have to adjust any additional ledgers as well as average balance ledgers yourself.
    5. No documents during the period in which you are adjusting transaction figures can be archived. Caution: You must ensure that these documents are not archived by establishing appropriate organizational rules and procedures.
    Only use this program after consulting with SAP or after checking the prerequisites thoroughly.
    You should adjust all differences together for a single company code. By setting the program parameters you can limit the adjustment to G/L currency types or to balances in subledgers.
    It is advisable to execute a test run first, which will list any differences that are found.
    Further notes - Authorizations
    Repair program authorization group (F_005)
    Company code authorization         (F_BKPF_BUK)
    Thanks
    Venkata Ganesh Perumalla
    Edited by: Venkata Ganesh Perumalla on Sep 28, 2010 1:30 PM

  • Difference between FBL1N and FB03

    Hi Gurus,
    Need some clarification on the System Behavior between the difference FBL1N and FB03.
    I raised the invoice in USD and my local currency is INR and the same is configured in Additional currencies with the option 1.
    For instance:
    Expenses a/c DR: 1000
    TDS deduction CR: 25.00
    Vendor a/c CR:975.00
    The system is rounding the amount UP as per the configuration. The problem is Vendor liability is showing as INR 975.00. But when i am clearing the invoice with the reflected liability in the vendor it is  throwing the Error Message With Account determination not defined for transaction ZDI
    But will it suffice if i clear the document in the USD currency. Please shed some light on this..
    BR
    Rohit raj.

    Hi,
    Please check
    1. Tax procedure TAXINN through transaction code and check account key ZDI and see whether G/L account is maintained against that key.  OR
    2. If not found in TAXINN procedure go to transaction code OBYC and check account key ZDI and see whether G/L account is maintained against that key.
    3. In addition to it define G/L accounts for foreign exchange gain or loss in OB09.
    Hope, this solves your issue else revert.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Difference between FBL1N and S_ALR_87012082

    Hello forum members,
    I have the following problem: In the actual fiscal year I get different results when I execute the FBL1N and the S_ALR_87012082. When I compare the results of the FK10N for a single vendor with the S_ALR_87012082 I get the same results. When I compare the FK10N with the FBL1N I get different results, but only for the actual year. In the previous years everythings seems ok.
    I also executed the report "TFC_COMPARE_VZ" and it says that there are no inconsistencies.
    Is there sth. that I don`t understand?
    Thank`s in advance.
    Best regards.

    Hi Imer Sabani
    Please check SAP OSS notes, seems like a program bugs.
    Rahul Rana

  • (very urgent)Difference of amount in vendor account and vendor invoice.

    Dear all,
    we are facing a issue related with vendor account actually MIRO post for the amount is showing difference compare with vendor invoice,
    please consider this scenario:-
    we are having vendor bill/invoice for Rs 1110/-
    but in SAP amount is showing 1105/- showing a Rs 5/- difference
    we found that this difference is showing becuse of we are maintaing material on single quantity whareas we got the price from vendor on BOX or bulk qty when we are deviding this price with the quantity the price will come on 4 decimals again here also we are maintaing two decimals. 
    from this we come to conclusion that this problem will occure again and again
    so it is advaisable to create a LOSS DUE TO AMOUNT ROUNDIG OFF account and posting these differnce to this gl to clear the open item that is showing in vendor master.
    Here please suggest me how to resolve this issue
    a)for the current scenario we are having many MIRO which we sre posted having the difference of only RS 1,2,3,4,5,
    this difference will come between this range only so please suggest me to resolve thisa issue
    SU

    Hi,
    if you go to SM30, view V_169L, you can configure what is considered as a "small difference". Small differences are then automatically posted, see account configuration in OBYC.
    However, I think this is designed if the vendor really invoices you a little bit too more or less. But in your case, this is not the problem. The problem is, as you have realized, that the price unit is set to small (actually, to 1 PC). The proper solution is not to post the differences away, but to stop this incorrect calculation. Small diffs should only be posted if there really were some small diffs!
    Example: agreed price with vendor is  1,001 RS per piece. As you keep your RS currency with two decimals, the price in SAP would be 1,00 RS.
    If the invoice is about 1000 pc, then the correct price is 1001,00 RS. This is what you see on the invoice and this is also correct. However, within SAP, you will see an expected value of 1000,00 RS only, so you have a difference of 1,00 RS.
    You do not need to touch the material master to fix this. Only thing you need to maintain is the PO line, where you have entered the price as 1,00 (rounded!!!) RS by 1 pc.  This must be changed like this: 1001,00 RS by 1000 pc. Then it will work fine.
    Hope that helps, points welcome
    Csaba

  • Differences in sort order between iTunes and iPod

    Can someone explain how the sort order of artists / albums works? It seems that it is different between iTunes and the iPod. In iTunes (7.3.1) I can enter data in the fields for Artist, Album Artist, Sort Artist and Sort Album Artist. When I get the tracks to appear in the order I want in iTunes, it doesn’t seem to transfer across to my iPod. I know there are some differences in how the sort order works in both, but how is it different?
    John.
    Dell 5150   Windows XP  

    ou must have an older iPod.
    I believe the new sort order only works on the new iPods (Nano and Video)

  • Difference in PL/SQL between 8i and 9i

    Hi
    Where can I find the exact differences in PL/SQL alone between 8i and 9i from developers point of view.
    I appreciate your help
    Thanks

    Well, you would find it at the most obvious place - The Oracle documentation, where else?
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/appdev.920/a96624/whatsnew.htm#967650

  • Difference in event handling between Java and Java API

    could anyone list the differences between Java and java-API in event handling??
    thanks,
    cheers,
    Hiru

    the event handling mechanisms in java language
    features and API (java Application Programming
    Features)features .no library can work without a
    language and no language has event handling built in.
    I am trying to compare and contrast the event
    handling mechanisms in the language and library
    combinations such as java/ java API.
    all contributions are welcome!
    thanks
    cheersSorry, I'm still not getting it. I know what Java is, and I know what I think of when I hear API. (Application Programming Interface.) The API is the aggregation of all the classes and methods you can call in Java. If we agree on that, then the event handling mechanisms in Java and its API are one and the same.
    So what do you want to know?
    %

  • Difference in text rendering between PDF and Mars?

    I was doing some testing with Mars and stumbled upon what
    seemed like suboptimal text rendering. Because it was quite subtle
    and I wanted to make sure there was an actual difference, I did a
    little comparison between PDF and Mars rendering.
    See this image. Can
    you see a difference?
    I'm still not sure whether there is an actual difference, but
    I still somehow got the impression that the upper example (PDF) is
    a little more polished then the lower one (Mars). Are different
    rendering paths actually used? Will it remain that way?
    My SVG for Mars was very simple:
    <text font-size="10pt" x="20" y="20" fill="rgb(0,0,0)"
    font-family="F0">aex</text>
    The PDF was produced with MS Office 2007 and Microsofts Save
    as PDF plugin (also at 10pts). The font is Gentium.

    The difference *IS* subtle, but you're right -- there does
    appear to be a perceptible difference between the two samples.
    Without making an in-depth study, it's hard to say whether we
    can do anything about this. Even though they're both opened in
    Acrobat, the rendering path for a Mars document is *VERY* different
    from the path for a PDF document, and many of the events along the
    chain are out of the control of those of us writing the Mars
    plugin. There are some text-quality issues that I'd like to take
    care of in time for our next release, however; perhaps I'll be able
    to address this particular issue at the same time.

  • Difference in WS performance between Search and Retrieve operations?

    All,
    We are currently working on a new repository and planning to use MDM webservices on top of that repository for searching and retrieving the data.
    Now I'm curious about the difference in performance between the Search and the Retrieve operations and also within the Retrieve operation, between the different identification methods (internal ID, auto ID, remote key, unique field and display field).
    Because in the webservices guide is stated that the identification methods are listed in order of best performance, but what are these performance differences between these methods (e.g. a retrieve on internal ID is x times faster than a retrieve on remote key which on his turn is x times faster than a retrieve on display fields which on his turn is x times faster than a search operation on same display field).
    Of course the performance depends on lot of other things as well, but I just want to get a feeling on the performance related to eachother (keeping all other variables that can influence the performance the same!)!
    I hope that any of you has experiences with all possibilities and can share performance measurements between the different operations related to eachother.  Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Marcel Herber

    Hi,
    Did you implment Webservices in your site.
    We are also having a similar scenarion where we have to serach a Records in MDM from SAP PI based on the certain criteria. I am concerned about the SAP MDM performance , since we are having heavy amount data being loaded every 30 minutes.
    Please let me know the performace aspects of using Webservices.
    Thanks
    Ganesh Kotti

  • Differences in "storage used" between iPad and iTunes

    I have an iPad Mini 2 and there a differences between the stated "storage used" between the iPad and iTunes.
    Looking in the general settings "Storage" it states I have used 113GB and available is 413MB.
    Looking on iTunes, when the iPad is connected, it states I have 67.20GB free.
    Which is correct and what causes the problem?
    How is it fixed if it is because the iPad has a fault?
    Many thanks.

    It is now a couple of weeks and noticed the discrepancy occurring again.  I did not want to go through the above process again because it took about 4 hours to get my iPad up, running again and normal.
    Again, there was a difference in memory by about 20GB.
    This time it tried something different.
    1) Went into General settings on iPad and managed memory.  From here I removed all films and TV episodes.  Now Video memory was zero.
    2) Switched off WiFi.  When I opened the Video app, I noticed a pile of films and TV episodes showing, even though they had the cloud icon.  They could even be watched.  I deleted these films/episodes.
    3) Viewed the iPad memory using iTunes on laptop and compared to iPad general settings usage (video memory negligible).  Both numbers pretty much spot on.
    My musings - I can only assume that the iPad does not properly delete films/episodes that I had previously watched.  It is evidently holding on to the video, even though I had deleted them and they were not showing in general settings.  Though it is a hassle, I at least now how to find where the "lost" memory is and how to reclaim it.

  • Difference of JDK version between sharing and non-sharing

    Hi,
    Here, I got two version of JDK 1.6 as below:
    Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_01-b06, mixed mode)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_01-b06, mixed mode, sharing)
    What's the difference between them? Where can I download the non-sharing one?(actually, the non-sharing version now I got, is somebody gave me, he can't remember where he got it)
    I know the sharing version can speed up the loading process, but the problem I met has nothing concerning about this.
    My application is to read data from some xml files, and to import them into database. But the performance of using these two version of JDK is so different. Using the non-sharing version could be pretty much 10 times faster than the sharing one. Even if I turn off the switch of sharing by using -Xshare:off, I still couldn't get help.
    Someone cool guy can help me here? Thanks!

    I don't personally have much experience relinking across platforms. (We use Windows servers although I use Mac locally.) But, here's what info I can provide:
    File paths in InDesign can be specified in 2 ways. One is platform-specific paths, and the second is URI notation. The URI notation is the same cross-platform, but even so, I imagine the volume names are different as well. Specifying the URIs in an InDesign file would prove to be challenging as well, although you can easily specify it in an IDML file.
    Another avenue to explore would be to specify relative paths. By default InDesign writes absolute paths, but relative paths are supported. If I'm not mistaken, that's what the InDesign package functionality does.
    Your best bet will probably be to run a script when the document loads on the machine for the first time and loop through all the links and change the paths to the correct location.
    HTH,
    Harbs

  • Difference in control panel between 6500 and 6500 e709n series

    Hello,
    Although I still have a non-solved problem in this topic (printing from IE8 x64), I already have another one.
    It seems that there are three 'printers' installed in control panel. One is called HP Officejet 6500 E709n Series fax, which I understand is the fax. However, the other two seem very similar to me. Hp Officejet 6500 and HP Officejet 6500 E709n Series. I would like to know the difference between those two, especially because I rarely have to switch between those two, when one of them does not work.
    Which one is the best to set as default, and why won't I just delete the other one?
    Thanks,
    Michael B

    Print from both to test them.  Delete one (if only one works, delete the other one).
    Say thanks by clicking "Kudos" "thumbs up" in the post that helped you.
    I am employed by HP

  • How much difference will I notice between 2011 and 2013 MBA, fully upgraded?

    I'm considering upgrading. I have a 2011 13 inch MBA, fully upgraded. So:
    * 256 GB SSD
    * 4 GB RAM
    * 1.8 Ghz core i7
    I'd get the 2013 13 inch with 512 GB, 8 GB ram and 1.7 GHz i7. I don't need the battery life, I'd be upgrading because I've noticed a few choke points on my current machine:
    * Sometimes tabs will lag when opening (despite very fast internet)
    * Fan is loud
    * Computer runs hot in summer months
    * Occasional system lag or lag on specific programs like Pages when I have large files open
    * General slowness that happens sometimes.
    Will any or all of those issues be reduced with the increase in RAM or other system wide increases?

    It's hard to say just how much improvement it will make on the examples you gave, because there is no indicator of how much resources are being consumed by open and running apps.
    Will you notice a difference... Probably. A HUGE difference, likely not, unless the memory resources are a limiting factor already on you machine.
    I have a 2010, a 2011, and a 2012 MacBook Air. The difference between the 2010 and the 2013's speed is only slightly evident on 75% of my usage. The other 25%, the diffrence is more pronouced (when doing long duration tasks like video and photo editing).
    You may want to upgrade this time around, especially with your memory possibly being a factor. I however, am sitting out this one cycle. (unless I fall of the wagon)

  • GR/IR amount Diffrences between MIRO and MIGO for Document currency

    Dear Friends,
    I have one issue in MIRO Document posting, I will explain the issue by below steps.
    1. I have created Purchase Order with option "Exchange rate fixed" and my PO Exchange rate is 1.8700
    Purchase order details
    Quantity - 2, Price - 23,376.85 and Total PO value - 46,753.70 EUR ( Document currency), local currency is SGD
    2. We posted Single Goods Receipts entry for the above PO and system took exchange rate from PO (1.87)
    GR Accounting document value - 46753.70
    3. We have create two invoice documents for the above single Goods Receipts.
    First invoice posted with correct value and accounting entries are below
    Debit - GRIR Clearing account - 23, 376.85 EUR - 43,714.71 SGD
    Debit - Material account - 0.00 EUR - 2272.23 SGD
    Credit - Vendor account - 23, 376.85 EUR - 45,986.94 SGD
    4. Problem in Second invoice posting only, Refer below accounting entries
    Debit - GRIR Clearing account - 29,221. 06 EUR - 43,714.71 SGD
    Debit - Material account - 0.00 EUR - 4219.52 SGD
    Credit - Vendor account - 23, 376.85 EUR - 45,986.94 SGD
    Credit - Material account - 5844.21 EUR - 0.00 SGD
    Now my questions is why system posted extra one credit line item with value 5844.21 EUR for second invoice, I tried to simulate this same situation again. but I couldnt get this extra line item for credit.
    Please advice and guide me.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    M.Ganesan

    Hi,
    Both Invoice header details Exchange rate is followed by Exchange rate table. But it did conversion based on PO Exchange rate.
    We didn't maintain Exchange rate type EURO for the currency EUR to SGD.
    Normally system will post the exchange differences in local currency not in Document currency. 
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    M.Ganesan

Maybe you are looking for