Difference in Balance between FAGLBO3 and FAGLL03?

Hello Experts,
I have perticular one GL Account (ASSET UNDER CONSTRUCTION) where the fagll03 and Faglb03 balance are not matching.
What may be the reason and how i ll sort it.It is high praority.
Regards,
Sumeya offrin

Hi,
First execute t.code FAGLF03 to find out the which are document not posted in the relevant period.
Then kindly execute program RGURECGLFLEX ( T.code : GLGCU1) and input the company code, fiscal year,posting period.
Select the test run & Load doc into all ledger.
If the system will show document which are not posted correctly.
Remove test run and execute in production run. All the relevant document will be posted and the difference will be removed.
Check the SAP Note : 1156974 for more info.
Note : RGURECGLFLEX will consume more time, so it will be better if you execute this program when there is not much load in the system.
Do revert fro any clarification.
Regards,

Similar Messages

Difference in the Balance between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Curr

Hi,
When i am trying to match the Balances between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Currency for the Period 8, we are getting the difference, The reconcilliaton Account was changed on 30.08.2010.
Please help Us in tracing the differences between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Currency.
What could be the possible reasons for the differences..
Thanks

Hi Varshani,
Please use the program/report SAPF070 to compare or reconcile your AR with GL balances. You can use SAPF071 to correct any inconsistencies. Provided below documentation for these programs.
SAPF070 - Compare Documents and Account Transaction Figures
Description
This program compares debit and credit transaction figures in customer, vendor, and G/L accounts with the debit and credit totals from documents posted in the corresponding posting period (accounting reconciliation). The sales totals are also compared for customer and vendor accounts. There is no separate comparison for special G/L transactions.
A comparison for G/L accounts can be made in company code currency and in parallel currencies (such as group currency). A comparison for customer and vendor accounts can only be made in company code currency.
After the program has finished, a message is issued to the user that started the program. This message summarizes the results of the reconciliation.
Output
The program compares the totals of an account on a periodic basis. If the debit and credit total differs between account and documents, the account is printed with the debit and credit totals and the difference.
Differences in G/L accounts are shown per transaction currency. The first line shows the amount in local currency, the second line shows the amounts in transaction currency.
If a document which falls within the selection range is posted during the program run, the program is terminated since a reliable result can no longer be delivered.
SAPF071 - Adjust Balances after Comparing Documents/Transaction Figures
Description
If a financial accounting comparative analysis (SAPF190) or a comparison of documents and transaction figures (SAPF070) shows that there are differences between documents and transaction figures, you can use this program to make an adjustment. The documents form the basis for this adjustment. The program adjusts the (redundant) transaction figures, which are only totals of amounts from documents.
Requirements
All of the following listed requirements must be fulfilled:
1. A financial accounting comparative analysis (SAPF190) or a comparison of documents and transaction figures (SAPF070) must be made, and differences must be found between documents and transaction figures.
2. There must not be any inconsistent documents found. These are listed in both SAPF070 and SAPF190 as well as in this program.
3. There cannot be any problems in the other modules. Caution: You have to check this yourself. Financial Accounting may be correct but the other modules may not be, and this will adversely affect the program run.
4. You can only make the adjustment in the ledgers which are compared by program SAPF070. This is ledger 00 or a user-defined ledger for all parallel local currencies except the group currency. (The program displays these ledgers). You have to adjust any additional ledgers as well as average balance ledgers yourself.
5. No documents during the period in which you are adjusting transaction figures can be archived. Caution: You must ensure that these documents are not archived by establishing appropriate organizational rules and procedures.
Only use this program after consulting with SAP or after checking the prerequisites thoroughly.
You should adjust all differences together for a single company code. By setting the program parameters you can limit the adjustment to G/L currency types or to balances in subledgers.
It is advisable to execute a test run first, which will list any differences that are found.
Further notes - Authorizations
Repair program authorization group (F_005)
Company code authorization (F_BKPF_BUK)
Thanks
Venkata Ganesh Perumalla
Edited by: Venkata Ganesh Perumalla on Sep 28, 2010 1:30 PM

Difference in value Between BW and R/3

Hi,
We are in the process of validating reports .We have observed difference in value for credit and debit amount fields in BW and for the same data is coming from standard data source 0EN_JVA_2 (Joint venture: Actual line item using delta extraction) we have done full data load. In the data source the data coming from a single field and that is spited based on debit/credit indicator in R/3.
I need your valuable input on where the problem is for the difference of value between BW and R/3.
Regards
Deva

Hi,
Is there any filterations in the IP?
Any data packet deletion activity in the start rountine?
Any update rule for the key figure is having routine with modifiying the value?
Kindly check.
In case if you are seeing number of records, always aggregation happens.
If the difference is in terms of quantity of the key figure values, kindly check the above three.
Kindly come to us so that we can suggest
Hope this helps
Janardhan Kumar

Amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting

Hi,
After we run 1KEK for ARAP transfer to profit center there is amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting for customere reconciliation account. We checked F.5D and rerun 1KEK this issue still exit.
Any idea for it? Thanks.

hi Kyle,
thanks for the effort, but it wasn't the thing i asked for ...
what i would like to find out is:
if CO area settings are set w/o profit centers, why the system still demands profit center assignment with cost center master data (ie.)
well, i can always turn off the message, but this isn't the solution i want to use ...
i will rather open one PC (along with dummy, of course) even though those are not used for the customer ... although, this will not solve statistical posting to cc with cost element category 11 ...
d.

Question about load balancing between Portal and ABAP

Hi,
I have the problem whit load balancing between Portal and ECC (ERC) ABAP
Exist two system:
1) ECC (ERP) ABAP = Backend Module = HR
2) EP (JAVA) = Frontend
The users (9000 users) logon in the EP and run query (data personal) in the ECC. The problem to all user connect in Central Instance and not in the Dialog Instance.
How can balancing the conecction HTTP (EP) to ECC (ABAP)??
I need balancing in the ECC to Dialog Instance

Jco -> right. Another possibility is that you use iviews that point to the backend in this case you will need to use a load balanced entry for the backend system in the [system landscape|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/47/8c1e438d7017fce10000000a42189c/frameset.htm] -> SAP_R3_LoadBalancing
If you have ESS deployed on your portal, you will most probably need to do both.
Cheers Michael

Is there any difference in quality between mp4 and m4v?

Is there any difference in quality between mp4 and m4v? I am figuring out how best to save old VCR files. Is the 264 category the best?

So, what would that software be? Anything that I mentioned, e.g., iMovie? Any Video Converter?
I'm a Mac user so I want files that play "natively" in QT X, QT 7, QL, iPod Touch, iPhone, iPad, and/or TV players. This means I want the H.264/AAC compressed data in MOV, MP4, or M4V file containers. I can use QT 7 Pro, MPEG Streamclip, and /or QT X to move MPEG-4/AAC compressed data to MOV file containers, MPEG Streamclip to movie M4V and MOV MPEG-4/AAC data to MP4 file containers, and Subler to move MP4 or MOV MPEG-4 AVC/AAC/AC3/Chapter data to M4V file containers. This is strictly a simple "copy" operation and no recompression of data is involved. (I.e., the quality is not changed.)
iMovie is a video editor and it forces an export conversion of your project once completed which can degrade quality. Have never used the Any Video Converter so I don't know if it has an audio and/or video "passthrough" feature for data already in a compatible compression formats. If it doesn't then any conversion it makes has the potential to degrade video content.
As to AVI, this is a legacy file container abandoned by Microsoft a dozen years ago in favor of their modernized WMV compression format/file type products. Compared to MKV, AVI is an outmoded/out-of-date container which I don't recommend you use unless you are a glutton for punishment. However, if you must use it, then you might try the AvidMux app. It can "copy" compatible content to a number of file container types—including AVI and MKV. Just don't blame me if its use creates more problems than it solves on current Mac systems.

Balance mismatching between FAGLB03 and FAGLL03?

Hello Experts,
I found difference in balance in one of my Bank payment clearing GL Account in faglb03 and fagll03 report.
But when i double click on "Cumulative balance column for any month the balance is matching with the balance of fagll03 report.
What may be the reason ?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Biswaranjan

1223997     Amounts incorrect in FAGLB03 navigation to FAGLL03 and FB03
970096     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences with active new G/L
1609283     FS10N: Drill-Down leads to differences with active splitting
1021174     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences despite Note 970096
1161837     FAGLB03: Balance <> Total of open items for OI selection
1600014 *     Balance mismatch / MSITEM033 - No items selected (see long text) / Missing line

Movie export size not available/balance between size and quality

Hi,
I imported some film into iMovie 08 from my Canon HD camcorder, at full 1920 x 1080 size. After I finished editing it, I wanted to export the final movie at 960 x 540. This size is not available under the "standard" share options ("large" is 1280 x 720 and "medium" is I can't remember what exact size but smaller than 960 x 540). Similarly, when I go into "Export using QuickTime" and try to create an H.264 movie there, the 960 x 540 option simply isn't available. What gives?
The reason I wanted to use this size was to try to cut down on file size. I exported the movie at 1280 x 720 and got a 380Mb file. So I wanted to try it at 960 x 540 and see what difference that made to the file size and quality. Since I couldn't seem to do it using iMovie, I ended up taking the 1280 x 720 video and using ffmpegx to convert it to 960 x 540. The problem is that I ended up with a file that was, bizarrely, even bigger (384Mb), and that had a thin green line across the bottom of the video.
So, in summary, my three questions are:
1. Why can't I export from iMovie in 960 x 540?
2. Why does my ffmpegx conversion result in an even bigger file?
3. What's the best way for me to get the optimum balance between file size and quality? (For viewing on Apple TV/HD television).
Thanks in advance,
Rob

Another very good 3rd party slideshow application is PhotoPresenter. It has some of the nicest themes I've seen in any slideshow application (including the Apple TV introduction theme) and will export to a variety of sizes up to 720 x 480 which is DV-DVDCPRO - NTSC.
Do you Twango?
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

Load-Balancing between Foreign and two Anchors

Hi, we have two foreign controllers (one active, one standby) and two anchor controllers. All APs are connected to the active foreign controller. The layer 3 networks for the wlan clients on both anchors are different for the same SSID. SSID: Internet, anchor 1: Subnet A, anchor 2: Subnet B. So when a client is getting anchored to Anchor 1, the clients will get an ip from subnet A and when the client is getting anchored to anchor 2, the client will get an ip from subnet B.
This is so far not a big problem because we only have a few accesspoints in some rooms. But what will happen, when we have a full covered wlan and the client roams from one AP to the other AP? Is there a possibility, that the client will anchored to a different anchor while roaming? I think this will result in a lack of connectivity because without a real disconnect the client will not ask for a new IP address.
Other question: Is it possible to disable this load-balancing between anchor controllers? Or can i make a client sticky to only one anchor as long as an access-session is established?
All controllers are 5760 with 3.3.3 software.

Hi acontes,
It's an interesting question.
In this case, if all AP's are on WLC-A and there is no possibility that an L3 inter-subnet roam will occur between WLC-A and WLC-B, I would just forward WLC-A to Anchor A and WLC-B (in the event of fail over) to Anchor B (if Anchors reside on different subnets). If you must specify Anchor A and Anchor B on each WLC for redundancy purposes, it's important to understand the guidelines and limitations with regard to Foreign / Anchor Design.
As Scott mentioned, the limitation with Anchoring design is that there is no primary / secondary configuration for an Anchor on the Foreign WLC.
If WLC-A has two entries (1) for Anchor-A and (2) for Anchor-B, the EoIP tunnels are establish and load-balancing occurs in a round robin fashion.
Keep in mind the following with regard to guest N+1 redundancy:
•A given foreign controller load balances wireless client connections across the list of anchor controllers configured for the guest WLAN. There is currently no method to designate one anchor as primary with one or more secondary anchors.
•Wireless clients that are associated with an anchor WLC that becomes unreachable are re-associated with another anchor defined for the WLAN. When this happens, assuming web authentication is being used, the client is redirected to the web portal authentication page and required to re-submit their credentials.
Since traffic is transported at Layer 2 via EoIP, the first point at which DHCP services can be implemented is either locally on the anchor controller or the controller can relay client DHCP requests to an external server. Since the IP address directly correlates to the DMZ subnet or the interface where the traffic egresses, it is possible for some clients to get IP's from both Subnet A or Subnet B in the event that WLC-A is building EoIP to both anchors.
1) What happens if my clients roam?
Nothing... since all AP's are on WLC-A, it's Intra-Controller Roaming
Each controller supports same-controller client roaming across access points managed by the same controller. This roaming is transparent to the client as the session is sustained, and the client continues using the same DHCP-assigned or client-assigned IP address. The controller provides DHCP functionality with a relay function. Same-controller roaming is supported in single-controller deployments and in multiple-controller deployments.
Would it be better to choose the same DHCP Pool on both anchors?
It's probably better to have redundant anchors on the same subnet, but it's not required.
3) How would you design this :-)
WLC-A <--EoIP--> Anchor A (DHCP Pool A)
WLC-A <--EoIP--> Anchor B (DHCP Pool A)
It's important to remeber what Scott mentioned about the lack of a primary / secondary relationship. If multiple controllers are added as mobility anchors for a particular WLAN on a foreign controller, the foreign controller internally sorts the controller by their IP address. The controller with the lowest IP address is the first anchor. For example, a typical ordered list would be 172.16.7.25, and 172.16.7.28. If the first client associates to the foreign controller's anchored WLAN, the client database entry is sent to the first anchor controller in the list, the second client is sent to the second controller in the list, and so on, until the end of the anchor list is reached. The process is repeated starting with the first anchor controller.
If any of the anchor controller is detected to be down, all the clients anchored to the controller are deauthenticated, and the clients then go through the authentication/anchoring process again in a round-robin manner with the remaining controller in the anchor list. This functionality is also extended to regular mobility clients through mobility failover. This feature enables mobility group members to detect failed members and reroute clients.

Differences xml-db between R10g2 and R11_2 ?

HI,
there are differences in xml-db between R10g2 and R11_2 ?
where I can find about it
regards
Edited by: astramare on Feb 17, 2011 3:04 PM

ok:
we have changed our DB from R10.2 to R11_2
by using DataPump
we do create a lot of different schema-based xml-Data
by using DBMS_XMLGEN
from a sql/xml-function based View
like
xmldoc := DBMS_XMLGEN.getXML(ctx);
xmldoc_xmlType:=(xmltype(xmldoc)) ;
xmldoc_xmlType.isSchemaValid
dbms_xslprocessor.clob2file
all other xml_schema do work fine after migration
with this one following exception
while validate the output inside a package
we get an error
LSX-00285: Referenzierter Schlüssel "405986.0" ist nicht definiert
to look at differences
I have identical created
one XML-output in the ( old ) 10gR2 -DB
and
one XML-output in the ( new ) 11R2 - DB
both I can ok validate against the same schema inside XML-Spy ( Vers 2006 )
but
the R10_2 XMLType does ok validate in DB 10gR2
the R11_2 XMLType does not validate in R11 !
by view the xml-data-files in XMLSpy or another editor
there obvious a difference:
In the SQL/XML-select I work with .extract
the xml-output from R10 is correct in a xml-like structure
the xml-output from R11 is not
both data-file have the identical ascii-words
but different size in kByte
the call to register the schema in R10_2 and R11_2 is identical:
dbms_xmlschema.registerSchema(
schemaurl => vschemaurl,
schemadoc => xsd_file,
local => FALSE,
gentypes => TRUE,
genbean => FALSE,
gentables => TRUE,
force => FALSE,
owner => dbuser
,CSID => nls_charset_id('AL32UTF8')
the xml-schemas looks :
R10
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.abcde.de/nsdir"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
xdb:flags="311"
xdb:schemaURL="http://www.abcde.de/nsdis/SCHEMABEZ.XSD"
xdb:schemaOwner="USER"
xdb:numProps="36">
R11:
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.abcde.de/nsdir"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
-- new ?!
xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true"
-- flag ?!
xdb:flags="8503"
xdb:schemaURL="http://www.abcde.de/nsdis/SCHEMABEZ.XSD"
xdb:schemaOwner="USER"
xdb:numProps="36">
may be its a problem inside the data in the Views ?
or a difference between R10 and r11 ?
regards

Load balance between DLSw and CIP routers

Take a look on this environment:
- 4 routers receiving all DLSw peers and circuits
- 4 routers with CIP boards connected to 2 mainframes
All CIP routers are configured with same MAC address. All routers (DLSw and CIP) are connected on a Ethernet LAN switching, so this traffic are pure LLC2.
How I can balance the traffic between DLSw and CIP routers ?
Thank's in advance.

I am not sure if I totally understand the topology. Let me rephrase it. Please correct me if I misunderstand the topology. In a data centre, there are 4 DLSw routers terminating DLSw peer connections from the remote sites. In the same data centre, there are 4 CIP routers which connects to 2 mainframes. CSNA is configured on all CIP router, which uses the same MAC. You configure transparent bridging on the DLSw routers, which connect to the same ethernet switches as the CIP routers. You configure SR/TLB on the CIP routers; so that all LLC2 circuits coming from the DLSw routers connect through the ethernet interfaces of the CIP routers.
Do you want the LLC2 circuits from a DLSw router load balance across 4 CIP routers? As duplicate MAC address is not allowed, there is no way to connect all 4 DLSw routers and CIP 4 routers on the same VLAN.
I can think of a couple of workarounds.
1. Enable SNASw on the 4 DLSw routers. Create a VDLC port on all 4 DLSw routers. The MAC address of the VDLC interface is the same. The VDLC MAC address is pointed by the remote SNA stations. Each DLSw router uses one of the CIP routers as DLUS.
2. If this is the case, create 4 VLANs on the ethernet switches. Connect a pair of DLSw router and CIP router to each VLAN.

Difference in speed between i5 and Core 2 Duo (same GHz)?

My two-year old MacBook Pro has a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor and 4GB RAM.
The cheapest MacBook Pro introduced today has a 2.4GHz i5 processor with 4GB RAM.
Anyone have any idea what the speed difference might be between these two? Approximately?
And does software have to be re-written to take advantage of the i5? In other words: What do I stand to gain if upgrading today?

Read this page and it should answer your questions.
http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/performance.html
Check out the new remodeled MacOSG website! 24-hour Apple-related news & support.
 MacOSG: An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast  Follow us on Twitter: MacOSG

Does anyone know what triggers the switch between text and iMessage in the middle of a conversation? Are there any differences in billing between text and iMessage?

In the middle of a text conversation between another iOS 5.0 iPhone user and myself, the conversation elements switched back and forth several times between Text and iMessage. The phone actually tracked it and put little lines indicating the switch, and my comments changed from green to blue and back again. I can't think of anything I changed in the middle of the conversation. I was outside WiFi range, using the Cell network at the time. Now I tried it again, while i'm on WiFI and the messages are Text (green) again.

1. Windows 8.1 Enterprise w Update is the best. It allows you for sideloading in corporate environment without additional tools and licenses.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/jj874388.aspx
2. N series is for EU (without IE).
3. Profesional is fine, but you will need some tools to achieve the same functionality that you have in "pack" Enterprise.
4. VL is volume license, a type of license for multiple computers (to say it simply)
5. MSDN forum is better alternative for problems like this.
6. Attached to MSDN are licenses or at least references to web resources. Read license agreements carefully and let your installation and use follow the license.
Rgds
Milos

Difference of balance between Sub Accounting and General Accounting !?

Hi,
i have a difference between the sub and the general accounting, the correct balance is in the general accounting.
When i show the balance of the sub accounting with the Tcode FK10N i find that the difference comes from the last year, there is a balance of 10.000 Euro that is already cleared but it is still apearing in FK10N and in other Tcodes of sub accounting.
Please how can i solve that ?
Regards.

F.07 is the Balance Carry Forward; it copies the suppliers (and customers) balances from one year to the next one (tables LFC1, LFC3, KNC1, KNC3).
You should check that the opening balance of one year is the same as the closing balance of previous year. If it is not true, F.07 should repair the data in the tables.

Difference balance between FK10N and FBL1N

Hi All,
In FK10N for a vendor for year 2012 there is a cumulative balance carried forward from previous year is 3711.80
When checked in FBL1N there is no items for 'Open items' and for 'all items' the balance is ZERO.
Will balance of FK10N has to match with FBL1N?
If it does not match, what is the reason?
Thanks,
Vidya

Offcourse, it should tally.
FK10N displays only posted documents, but FBL1N can display parked documents also.
So while running FBL1N, select All Items and give END DATE only as 29.02.2012 and execute it.
Dont select spl gl tranxs, parked items, noted items, customer items,
Now run FK10N and execute for the same inputs and see.
You can also double click on ANY AMOUNT FIELD in FK10N, so system will drilldown to line item breakup for that amount. So for each amount field after doible clicking if you found the breakup for the same amount, then it is ok.

Difference in Balance between FAGLBO3 and FAGLL03?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for