Difference in S_ALR_87012172 & FAGLL03

Hi Gurus,
We have an issue that total balance of the two reports S_ALR_87012172 & FAGLL03 are not matching. This is because of alternative recon.account maintained with respect to GL maintained in customer master. Therefore, whenever posting done from SD side, alternative recon,account getting hit and altemately this alternative recon.account amount reflecting in main GL account which is maintained in customer master in the S_ALR_87012172(customer balances in local currency) only. This is not the case for FAGLL03 report, hence there is difference in the report balances. But now my concern is I would like to add a "GL account"field in the dynamic selection screen of report S_ALR_87012172, so that user can view both GL accounts balances separately(please see the attached screen shot for better understanding)
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Please note that transaction code S_ALR_87012172 shows customer balances and FAGLL03 shows G/L balances. In FAGLL03 it shows all the customer documents posted to that G/L (reconciliation account).
You are requested to compare S_ALR_87012172 and FD10N. Please refer below screen shots.
1. S_ALR_87012172
2. FD10N
Hope this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas

Similar Messages

Difference in GL Balances between two Standard Report fbl3n and fagll03

Hi ,
Mismatch of balances between two standard report ie.fbl3n and fagll03 . We are giving the complete example of what we are facing right now ... please go through the examples .
ENTRY NO. 1
We have posted one MIRO , Accounting Posting is as below : -
PK         Description    Amount
86         GR/IR             1000.00
31         Vendor           -800.00
50          TDS               -200.00
ENTRY NO. 2
We have Reversed the MIRO through MR8M , Accounting Posting was as below : -
PK         Description     Amount
21         Vendor             800.00
40          TDS                 200.00
96          GR/IR            -1000.00
But in Standard report FAGLL03 , .The line items of above twoi entries under GL " TDS " are showing in this way : -
Doc No.      PK      Ammount
Entry 1       50          -200.00
Entry 2       40          -200.00 -
> ?????
*OPEN ITEMS          - 400.00----
> ?????
Although in other Standard report FBL3N , the same are showing correctly as shown below
Doc No.      PK      Ammount
Entry 1       50          -200.00
Entry 2       40          +200.00
*OPEN ITEMS                0.00
PLEASE HELP
Regards
Soumitra Bhattacharya

Hi
FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) - this report is related to ledger reporting purpose. this reports is available after ECC 5.0.
FBL3N - is line item display - this is only GL reports (not in ledger reporting)
if you find any difference is values please check the report variant you are using and ledger you are activated.
hope this will help you.
Regards
Ram

Difference in Balance between FAGLBO3 and FAGLL03?

Hello Experts,
I have perticular one GL Account (ASSET UNDER CONSTRUCTION) where the fagll03 and Faglb03 balance are not matching.
What may be the reason and how i ll sort it.It is high praority.
Regards,
Sumeya offrin

Hi,
First execute t.code FAGLF03 to find out the which are document not posted in the relevant period.
Then kindly execute program RGURECGLFLEX ( T.code : GLGCU1) and input the company code, fiscal year,posting period.
Select the test run & Load doc into all ledger.
If the system will show document which are not posted correctly.
Remove test run and execute in production run. All the relevant document will be posted and the difference will be removed.
Check the SAP Note : 1156974 for more info.
Note : RGURECGLFLEX will consume more time, so it will be better if you execute this program when there is not much load in the system.
Do revert fro any clarification.
Regards,

Difference between FBL5N & S_ALR_87012172

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem like customer balances are not tallying for T.Codes: FBL5N & S_ALR_87012172. Could any body give solution for this.
Thanx in advance.
Regs,
Bhaskar

Hi ,
There could be two reasons:
1. There is a difference between the selection parameters that you are using for the 2 reports.
2. There could be a genuine difference in the totals and line item table.
To check both the above cases, Execute FD10N for the year you see the difference. Double click on the balance value for the period where you have seen the difference. The double click will call FBL5N for the period and customer. If the total of the line item report matches the balance in FD10N, then the issue is either the selection or you are not reading the report correctly.
If there is a difference, then you need to carry out a series of actions. Do revert if this is the case.
Cheers.

Difference between FAGLL03 and FBL3n

Hi
My user is taking report for GL line items for 5 GL Accounts for 3 company codes for the month of July (Tcode: FAGLL03 and FBL3n).
But in FBL3n, there are 5 items and in FAGLL03 there are only 3 line items. When i did from my id, it properly shown me all 5 line items in both tcodes
Please let me know the reason

Hi,
After gl balance report executed use T.code /NSU53 to see the missing authorisation object. Go to PFCG give the role and you can add the missing authorisation object to that role.
When you double click on the balance check are choosen only open items to be displayed or not. If line items are bulk then only system will give option.
Regards,
Sankar

Difference in amount in T code Fagll03 and Table BSIS, FAGLFLEXA

Dear Experts
There are three GL accounts which are maintained on Open item basis.
When I check the balance in T Code FAGLL03 I get some balance which matches with the trail balance. But when I check the balance at table level it does not match.
The table that I am checking is BSIS, FAGLFLEXA. I am checking these table as this table contains the data of GL open item. At the moment the table BSIS, FAGLFLEXA and T code FAGLL03 all given different figures.
Is there any other was that I should check the balance.
Your suggestion is much appreciated.
Regards
Paul

Hi
I was checking the document by clicking the general ledger view in FAGLL03.
I have chosen entry view and it is working.
Thanks

Difference between cleared items,open items and all postings (FI).

Hi experts,
Can anybody tell me the difference between cleared items,open items and all postings for an account.
While running corresponding bapis and transaction FAGLL03 (for GL) or FBL1N (for accounts payable) i found that in some cases all postings is less than cleared items or open items for a time period. How could it happen.According to my knowledge all postings should contain cleared items and open items.
Please correct me..
Thanks and Regards
Arjun

Hi Arjun,
For every Billing Documnet created(VBRK/VBRP-VBELN) there will be an accounting document created in BSID/BSAD tables.
OPEN ITEMS means the Billed/Invoice Amounts that are pending from Customers, i.e which we have to receive from Customers.
CLOSED ITEMS means the AMOUNTS received from that customer.
OPEN ITEMS : fetch data from BSID table Only
CLOSED ITEMS : fetch data from BSAD only.
ALL POSTINGS : fetch data from both BSID and BSAD.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Nitin.

Vendor and G/L line item are difference

Dear Gurus,
I have problem about FBL1N and FAGLL03 are difference
Example
period 3 : vendor A have Invoice # 1 with amount 100-
period 4 : Invoice # 1 was cleared with amount 100
When i run FBL1N as of period 4 the balance of Invoice # 1 is zero but the balance in FAGLL03 is 100-
The quesion is why clearing document does not disappear in FAGLL03
Thanks for the answer

Dear rohit aggrawal ,
I have already checked all posting. it is cerrect.
posting date for Invoice document is 31.08.2007
posting date and clearing date for clearing document is 31.08.2007
so when i execute FAGLL03 with open item as of 31.08.2007 the balance should be zero.
but it is show invoice document only, clearing document does not disapplear.
additional information, i check the clearing document does not have in table FAGLFLEXA
Edited by: runma ne on Jul 15, 2008 6:42 AM

GR/IR rounding difference in LC

Hello Team,
We have client specific scenario in P2P cycle. Please find below our scenarios and suggest further on this issue.
We will Create PO                                                  QTY   Price    Amount.
                                                                                   10     100        1000
Then We book an Invoice                                          12     100        1200
Then we Goods Receipt                                            10     100        1000
Then we book a credit memo                                      2     100          200
After all above transactions done, then, In MB5S -> we see a difference of 0,01 in the value of the GR and invoice,
even if the quantities are in balance:
                                                                                QTY   Price     Amount
                                                    Goods Receipt     10      100        1000
                                                    Invoioce receipt   10      100        1000.01
In FAGLL03 for the GR/IR account, we see also the open amount of 0,01
euro:
Thanks,
Raj.

This is probably because of rounding. I assume that . is decimal point in the example you have mentioned.
If you use distribution by percentage, it may not be possible to exactly split the quantity unless your percentages are nice round figures like 10% or 50%. So there will be some rounding off if you have 27%, 31%, etc.
The usual practice is to use the a smaller unit of measure if more accuracy is needed. For example, in your case, you may have used 3360 dm3 instead of 3.360 m3 (I know it does not sound logical since people are not used to dm3) or 3360000 cm3. This will make the splitting easier, but the downside is - there will be some confusion for the users - particularly vendor, goods recipient, etc.
Lakshman

Customer balance report - S_ALR_87012172

Hi sap gurus, I searched forum but I couldn't get enough knowledge. how does S_ALR_87012172 calculate customer's balance value? based on posting date, clearing date, document date or other date? I'm checking with fbl5n but balances are different.as I understand, other sap users have same problem but there isn't clear information.
difference between the balance of FBL5N and the balance of S_ALR_87012172
Difference between FBL5N & S_ALR_87012172
S_ALR_87012172 when compared with FBL5N does not reconcile
diff in customer balance in the report S_ALR_87012172 & fbl5n

Hello,
You don't need to check clearing date.
Please select data from BSID and BSAD less equal to key date. Is it equal to total balance report?
You can balance report per each customer, I think you can check it for wrong balance's customer.
Please share result to me.
Regards,
Burak

Balance mismatching between FAGLB03 and FAGLL03?

Hello Experts,
I found difference in balance in one of my Bank payment clearing GL Account in faglb03 and fagll03 report.
But when i double click on "Cumulative balance column for any month the balance is matching with the balance of fagll03 report.
What may be the reason ?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Biswaranjan

1223997     Amounts incorrect in FAGLB03 navigation to FAGLL03 and FB03
970096     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences with active new G/L
1609283     FS10N: Drill-Down leads to differences with active splitting
1021174     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences despite Note 970096
1161837     FAGLB03: Balance <> Total of open items for OI selection
1600014 *     Balance mismatch / MSITEM033 - No items selected (see long text) / Missing line

Differences Between Entry View and GL View - Doc. Splitting

Hello Experts,
I need some help about an issue occuring in our Client right now, differences in Entry view and GL View. Any help will be appreciated.
- Debit or Credit Balance posting of an account does not match with the balance posted in GL View, generally the GL view posts an amount above of the Entry view, and then it cause the Debit/Credit balance does not match with the movement in Entry View. Example Below from Quality System:
Debit Balance in January 2013: 319.794.641,38
Movement from FAGLL03 - OK.
Movement from FBL3N - Entry View Difference: 319.794.619,86 - 319.794,641,38 = 21,52 Debit
Checking NEW-GL Movement, we found the posting difference:
The Document Entry View: 5.465,22 Credit From Bank Account
The GL View - SAP Credited 5.486,74 Bank Account PC 1411 and Cr Bank Account PC 1444.
Total: -5.486,74 + 21,52 = 5.465,22 OK on Balance, but not OK from movement considering the Entry view.
- Questions:
- I understood the calculations, it was calculated as mentioned in note 1072850_Field overflow or very large amounts due to doc splitting
- Is this supposed to happen by SAP Doc.Splitting perspective?
- I am facing this issue because we need to send to the government account balances and their movements, and according to laws we need to pay additional amount for addtional lines generated, so it was better to send the information based in Entry View, not in GL View.
- FS10N Show warning message "New general Ledger Implemented, use FAGLB03", and when i execute the transaction the balance showed was the balance from FAGLB03.
- SAP 605 APPL.
Regards,
Leandro.

Hi ,
Can you Please look at OSS note
1655571 - Multiple values and multiple/additional line items appearing in the NewGL View when compared to Entry View
Many Thanks

Purchase order number EBELN in line items of g/l accounts FAGLL03

Hi,
nevertheless the purchase order is filled in the BSEG segment it does not appear in the fitting column in the line items of FAGLL03.
Does anyone know why and how to solve this?
Thank you,
Theresia

HI,
Please use transaction OBVU you already add fields BSEG-EBELN and BSEG-EBELP to the list of special fields.
Did you run program RFPOSXEXTEND and BALVBUFDEL after that ?
Then you should choose these fields in your line item display. Make sure that you are using the special fields and not the standard fields. The difference can be seen when you click with the right mouse button on the 'Change layout' screen when you
are adding or deleting fields. You can then choose the option 'Show technical field names' and choose the fields 1-U_EBELN, 1-U_EBELP.
Please can you also review the attached notes:
    0207436 - Line items: unfilled fields / double special field
    0320366 - Line items: display special field via menu path
    0215798 - FBL*N: Special fields are not displayed
Hope this helps. Please Assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Combining transactions FAGLB03 and FAGLL03

Hi all,
I'm trying to combine the total balances of transaction FAGLB03 and attach it to the item-level outputs of FAGLL03. If i am searching between dates 01/01/2009 to 31/12/2010, then I would start with the ending balance of 31/12/2008 as the first line, followed by all the items within the searched period.
It should then look like the following:
Balance:             2000
Item details from transaction FAGLL03
New Balance:          xxx
What is the best way to approach this?
Thanks,

1223997     Amounts incorrect in FAGLB03 navigation to FAGLL03 and FB03
970096     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences with active new G/L
1609283     FS10N: Drill-Down leads to differences with active splitting
1021174     FS10N: Drilldown -> differences despite Note 970096
1161837     FAGLB03: Balance <> Total of open items for OI selection
1600014 *     Balance mismatch / MSITEM033 - No items selected (see long text) / Missing line

GL Report Differences

Hey guys,
I have a problem. For some G/L accounts in my system, two reports are giving me different balances, namely FS10N and s_alr_87012172 which are in fact supposed to be reading data from the same source. Is there a diagnostic report or something which can help me find out where the discrepency is?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Regards,
Feroz Buksh

hi,
1) s_alr_87012172 is for customers in my system
i think, you mean report RFSSLD00
where are the differences try to analyse differnet currencies or different business areas
2) first control balances and items with report RFSOPO00
3) another report for GL is RFSUSA00
4) you can look directly in the corresp. table
it's table GLT0 for SAP-Rel. <= 4.7
or write a query or report with logical datbase SDF and structures SKC1A / SKC1C
A.
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

Difference in S_ALR_87012172 & FAGLL03

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for