Difference in speed btw 100 & 1000 ethernet

I'm considering wether to buy the Apple wifi 802.11n router. It has 100 ethernet ports only. How much slower is the speed btw 100 on the apple router and a Linksys 1000 router?

Hi,
I spotted this thread, and thought it might be appropriate to ask my question here.
I know I must be a bit of a dunce, but are their any ways to make sure that the ethernet port on my PowerPC iMac are set to work at the correct speed?
I ask, because I am having a problem with my cable broadband connection with my iMac. I have a 20MB connection, and when I use my 4 year old Win XP system I can achieve great speeds up to around 15 - 17 MB downloads speeds.
But on my PowerPC iMac, I can hardly get above 2MB download speeds.
My service provider has confirmed that my connection is working fine, and they have replaced my five year old cable modem, but still this problem persists on my iMac.
My Service Provider suggests that I check that my Ethernet port is set to receive 100MB+
Can you advise, or anyone else put me in the picture.
I am using a an Ethernet cable connected directly to my cable modem, and the Ethernet socket on my iMac.
Thanks

Similar Messages

10/100 to 10/100/1000 ethernet and SSD's

Hello,
I'm new to this so please bear with me.
I own a old Lenovo N500 with a 10/100 network capability. I have a 200mbs glasfibre connection. I have just purchased an adaptor to allow a hardwired connection through USB (480Mbs).
Questions:
Is there a board change I can do to make this internal so I can use the orignal hardwire connection and therefore up to 1Gbs?
I have a 2nd question about an SSD. What is the best SSD for this machine, up to 500gb? and are they just plug and play with this older machine.
Thanks in advance.
Buzz12

the battery is not faulty. ios 7.1 is totally wrong

3560 and 3750 - Question about 10/100/1000 ports

I am researching several Cisco products to recommend to a customer. I was wondering if the 10/100/1000 ports at a 3560 switch, will provide gigabit bandwith on each port or if the bandwidth is shared among several ports. The latter is how a 48 port 10/100/1000 line card would behave on a Cisco 4500 when, depending on the card, the gigabit bandwidth will be shared among 4 or 6 ports at a time.
What about 10/100/1000 ports on a 3750?
Thanks

The new Catalyst switches/modules such as the Catalyst 6500/6000, 4500/4000, 3550, and 2950 support 10/100/1000 Mbps negotiated Ethernet interfaces or ports. These ports work on 10Mbps, 100Mbps, or 1000 Mbps speed based on their connection to the other end. These 10/100/1000Mbps ports can be configured for speed and duplex negotiation in the same way as 10/100 Mbps ports on CatOS or Cisco IOS Software-based switches. Therefore, the configurations given in this document for 10/100Mbps port negotiation applies to 10/100/1000Mbps ports as well.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk214/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094781.shtml

10/100/1000 support on CRS 42-1GE module

Hi list,
I will appreciate any input.
Does the CRS 42-1GE module support 10/100/1000 speed on its ports?
Regards.

Hi Sam,
Thanks for the answer.
Even with SFP-GE-T with or without auto negotiation doesn't work?
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS-3(config-if)#speed ?
10 Ethernet is 10Mb
100 Ethernet is 100Mb
1000 Ethernet is 1Gb
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS-3(config-if)#speed
Best regards.

Why doesn't the SLM2024 Smart Switch 10/100/1000 support 10M?

Hi,
Since a couple of weeks I have installed 5 SLM2024 Gig Smart Switches. Now we have a new Time Attendance System that tries to communicate to the Cisco with 10M. The Cisco identifies it correctly but will not parse any info to the Device. Why is that?
Test it with a D-Link 10/100 Switch -> OK
Test with a Cisco 10/100 Switch -> OK
Test with noname 10/100/1000 Switch -> OK
Test with SLM2024 -> Failed.
I would love for someone to explain this to me. What does the Cisco do? I would gather that if a Switch is 10/100/1000 it can communicate over anyone.
Anybody?
Regards,
Richard

Hi Richard,
I would definitely expect to be receiving broadcast packets, maybe ARP packets from the time attendance advice.
Yep that is a problem.
But, why are you not receiving broadcast packets on the port that is connected to the time attendance device.hmm that my question that I am mulling in the back of my mind. Your switch port statistics showed an issue.
Packet capture
A wireshark or packet trace would be most useful , so mirroring the time attendance switch port to your PC's switch port would be useful. This would allow us to see what is coming in and out of that switch port.
Pretty easy to setup on this managed switch, see my screen capture below as an example.
Wireshark is a wonderful freeware 'sniffer' software that would allow us to see the ethernet frames coming in and out of the switch port in question.
to grab wireshark try the following URL; http://www.wireshark.org/download.html
Don't need much data just a 30 second capture and remember to undo the mirroring and save changes after the capture is taken.
MAC address Table
Be interesting to see the dynamic MAC address table to see the MAC address of the time attendance device.
Might be most intersting to add a static arp entry for the time attendance device, MAP it's MAC address to a switch port.
(This is only necessary if there isn't a dynamic ARP entry, MAC address of the time attendance device on the switch port.)
see my screen capture below, you will also note, that underneath the static address is a option to look at the dynamic address.
Switch port Status and Error log
But could be most useful to see the setting for that switch port similar to the two following screen captures.
lastly the log is informative as it might indicate what or where the error is.
David

Catalyst 3560 vs. Catalyst 3750 - 24 and 48p. 10/100/1000

I need some help in positioning the Catalyst 3560 against the Catalyst 3750 - (only 24 and 48p. 10/100/1000) Switches.
Under which circumstances should our customer buy 3560 and what are the arguments for the 3750 solution ?
What are the major differences ?
Thank you very much for your help !
Regards,
Cope

CAT3750 series support stackwise technology while 3560s do not. This is the main difference between 3560s and 3750s. The switching architecture between the two is very similar. Stackwise comes with lot of advantages. You can find more on CCO at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_white_paper09186a00801b096a.shtml

Creating a 20MB bandwidth using two cisco asa 5515x with a hub (10/100/1000)

hi all,
I would like to simulate a bandwidth of 20MB for my DR project testing on my two cisco asa 5515x and with a cisco hub (10/100/1000). I was thinking to make two connections on my "outside" vlan with both speed of 10 and etherchannel it and do it again on the other asa.
Do you think it will simulate 20MB bandwidth? Or any other suggestion? Please add any comment, thanks to all.

Hi Nicholas,
You have the HSRP running between your core devices. You can have your core A - ASA1 & Core-B - ASA2.
In your core switch you need to have a sepearate VLAN to connect the uplink to the firewall and asusual in asa you can have the primary and standby address configured and in core also you can have the vlan with hsrp ip configured.
But make sure that in your firewall you should mention the static routes for each subnets pointing to the core device hsrp.
The other scenario is you have make you ASA a standalone firewalls and in one firewall you need to have route to core a as primary and core b as secondary and in the other firewall vice versa. So that your traffic will get load balanced.
Please do rate if the given information helps.
By
Karthik

Drvice Manager /!\ next to NVIDIA nforce 10/100 Mbps Ethernet.Device cannot start Code 10

Product Name and Number:
HP Pavilion Dv9700
s/n [Personal Information Removed]
p/n FE395UA#ABA
Operating System:
Windows Vista 64bit
Current Issue:
When I open my Device Manager there is an /!\ next to NVIDIA nforce 10/100 Mbps Ethernet.
When I open it's properties there is a message under the Device Status stating:
"This device cannot start. (Code 10)"
It gives me the option to "Search for solutions" which has proven unsuccessful.
Also, I have the latest driver installed.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi,
Right click the device itself and select Uninstall. When this has completed, restart the notebook and let Windows re-discover the device and then check in Device Manager again.
Regards,
DP-K
****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
****I don't work for HP****
Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

NVIDIA nForce 10/100 mbps Ethernet Updated driver

I am trying to upgrade from Vista to Windows 7. I ran the upgrade advisor and it said that I need to download the updated driver for the NVIDIA nForce 10/100 mbps Ethernet 32bit driver to install after the installation. Where do I download it from and wich file do I download.

Hi Marilyn, First things first. Before you upgrade to Windows 7, be sure that you update the BIOS to the latest level. All too often I have people update the operating system only to find out later that the BIOS is causing issues and the HP posted BIOS update will not run with the existing operating system. You need a NVIDIA nFORCE chipset driver and I will post a link to that for you in just a moment. However, don't upgrade your PC until you donwnload the drivers and copy them to external media. This is one of the drivers needed. It's one of the latest nFORCE drivers.

NVIDIA NFORCE 10/100 Mbps Ethernet Upgrade Drivers

I am doing a Clean Install for upgrade with Win 7 Pro 64-bit OEM. I ran the Win 7 Upgrade Advisor and need advice on these items, on what I need to do for upgrade:
NVIDIA NFORCE 10/100 Mbps ethernet
NVIDIA GeForce GT630
NVIDIA High Definition Audio
NVIDIA nForce System Management Controller
Are these upgradeable & will work with Win 7 Pro 64bit?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi,
You should be able to find the Windows 7 drivers here. Download the drivers to external media before doing the upgrade.
Backup your PC and be sure to create the external HP recovery media.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

Connecting Rv180w and D-Link 5-Port 10/100/1000 Switch DGS-1005G

This simple exercise has become a pain. I have a D-Link 5-Port 10/100/1000 Switch DGS-1005G connected to an old (10 years old) linksys 4 port router and it works fine. When I try to connect the switch to my new RV180W it appears dead...no connectivity lights at all. I cannot see an uplink port on the RV180w.....I have tried crossover cable still no joy. Am I missing something?

Hi Tom,
Yes i am pretty sure, i have called 3S vision and confirmed it, also i conducted 3 test in 3 different switches last week and the camera worked just like that " Plug & Play ".
I have tested out 3 switches and they are :
Cisco Switch 16 Port 10/100
Netgear 8 port 10/100
Cisco Switch 8 Port 10/100
I was able to view the camera and modify the settings, upgrade the firmware, etc. all worked, except this model !!!!
I am losing hope on this and we are considering buying another switch which would be a waste of money.
Is there is any possible way to enforce the port to read it?
Also i have noticed one thing, whenver i plug the Camera to SG300-28P switch, the camera has a small led in the motherboard which keeps blinking red when its connected. It is like its trying to boot but not able too.
I have until the end of the week, if this issue is not sorted out with this switch model, i will have to buy another one

24 port or 48 Port 10/100/1000 with 4 POE

Hi I need to offer a solution to a cusotmer with 24 or 48 port 10/100/1000 switches with minimum 4 POE Ports
DOes Cisco have this solution

4 ports only for PoE? I think buying a 24-port PoE is a very expensive choice. May I recommend you buy a 4-port mid-span PoE switch instead?
If you Google "mid-span" poe, you'll find a number of manufacturers.
Another thing I would like to know is what are you trying to connect? Mid-Span PoE ports comes in a variety of "flavours", some will give you STANDARD 15.4W (or less) power but there are some which can give you 20.0W or 30.0W of power per port.
Now, if you are still determined to get a PoE switch, I would like to determine from you, for a 48-port PoE switch, if you want ALL 48-ports capable of delivering PoE? If you say yes, then the only choice you've got is the WS-C3560-48PD-SF or WS-C3750E-48PD-SF.
WS-C2975 (48 10/100/1000 PoE up to 24), WS-C2960G, WS-C3560G, WS-C3750 (24 OR 48 10/100/1000 PoE up to 24) are likely candidates.
Hope this helps.

Between the 2 fusion drives , 1 is 1tb 5400RPM and 1 is 1tb 7200RPM, will you see much difference in speed as I understand the speed comes from the ssd part..?

Between the 2 fusion drives , 1 is 1tb 5400RPM and 1 is 1tb 7200RPM, will you see much difference in speed as I understand the speed comes from the ssd part..?
Will it not be noticeable?

It would not be as noticable as one would think. The speed of the OS will come from the SSD portion of the drive. The SATA portion is mostly used for data storage which the drive only has to access as needed, not constantly. So over all, there is a bit of a difference but not enough to make a big impact.

Difference in speed between sp

Hope this is the right section, but im a little confused, when i was with talktalk i got around 9000KB/s, i left talktalk and i didnt have bb for a little while. Ive now joined bt and im only getting avg 4300KB/s
I did a bt speedtest and this is the results
Download speed achieved during the test was - 4304 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 600-7150 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :6144 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 448 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 5000 Kbps
please can somebody explain why theres such a huge difference in speed?
cheers

is this what you want to see?
ADSL Line Status
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
1 days, 09:18:25
Downstream:
6 Mbps
Upstream:
448 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type:
Fast
Noise margin (Down/Up):
5.1 dB / 23.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
30.4 dB / 15.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
19.8 dBm / 11.9 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
0 / 0
CRC Events (Down/Up):
2462 / 4
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
946 / 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
2432 / 5

CS6 - Will I notice a difference in speed/performance with only 512MB video RAM?

With regard to PS CS6: I'm specifically interested in CS6's ability to utilize video memory to make PS faster, more powerful; but will I notice a difference in speed/performance with only 512MB video RAM?
Currently running PS CS5 on an iMac (Duo-Core, 8GB RAM, 512MB Video RAM).
Was hoping Apple was going to release new Mac Pro (been saving dough for a few years now). Since that didn't happen, sticking with current Mac setup for at least another year, and this includes a video card that only has 512MB memory.
Is it worth it for me to upgrade to CS6 with regard to speed/performace?
Any input would be appreciated.

You need at least 1Gb video memory to make use of the new GPU accelerated features in CS6
From http://www.adobe.com/nz/products/photoshop/tech-specs.html
Mac OS
Multicore Intel processor with 64-bit support
Mac OS X v10.6.8 or v10.7
1GB of RAM
2GB of available hard-disk space for installation; additional free space required during installation (cannot install on a volume that uses a case-sensitive file system or on removable flash storage devices)
1024x768 display (1280x800 recommended) with 16-bit color and 256MB (512MB recommended) of VRAM
OpenGL 2.0–capable system
DVD-ROM drive
This software will not operate without activation. Broadband Internet connection and registration are required for software activation, validation of subscriptions, and access to online services.† Phone activation is not available.
* Some GPU-enabled features are not supported on Windows XP.
† This product may integrate with or allow access to certain Adobe or third-party hosted online services ("Online Services"). Online Services are available only to users 13 and older and require agreement to additional terms of use and Adobe's online privacy policy. Online Services are not available in all countries or languages, may require user registration, and may be discontinued or modified in whole or in part without notice. Additional fees or subscription charges may apply.

Difference in speed btw 100 & 1000 ethernet

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for