Difference of bench scores with same hardware. Why?

Hello guys!
I've made a benchmark test of my msi gtx 770 in 3dmark 11, and it has showed 144000 score(248000 gpu score and 58000 cpu score).
I saw benchmark test's scores on 3dmark.com and I saw higher than my scores(300000+gpu score) with same hardware(GTX770 + i5 4670K)
Why there are such a big difference in scores with same hardware and how I can increase performance of my hardware?
Sorry for my bad english, I belive you understand me.
My PC:
motherboard:Msi Z87-G45 gaming,
CPU:i5 4670K
GPU:MSI GTX770 gaming 2gb
SSD: A-DATA SP900
2x 4gb ram

your scores of 250000-260000 are typical OC values and people who have 300000+ will either have it at a stupid clock rate or have it water-cooled on the GPU to allow for much higher boosts off it as it will be much cooler......
alot of people who get massive results will have manually clocked the card to probably maximum speed and pushed the Voltage to the Maximum too (that's what they do to get impressive results but that's not sustainable as the GPU will give up if ran like that for more then a few test runs as it will start to burn out the silicon and be very unstable)

Similar Messages

Difference in stock value with same quantity

Dear Friends,
one of my user has a problem regarding difference in Stock value. when he had run the report MB52 up to 31/03/2011, and saved his value in temp file and now in current date he is using report MC.9 for same material up to 03/2011. now his problem is difference in stock value while stock quantity is same for particular material. and this thing is correct in all other material.
Are MB52 and MC.9 both reports give same data for same date like up to 31/03/2011 ? if yes then where would be the problem? why difference is coming and what should i need to check? please guide me, i am new in MM.
Thanks
Vijay Sharma

MC.9 is a statistic transaction which is using info structure information as basis, while MB52 basis is normal business data.
Updates for info structure have less priority, which means that it can happen that the update fails, but this does not effect the business transaction in general, and the transaction is not rolled back, which then leads to inconsistencies between both.
To solve this you would need to rebuild the information structure (which is only possible if no postings are made in this time of regeneration).

Is the mac mini server the same hardware as the other mac minis (except for the quad core i7 and dual hard drives) with different software or is it configured differently?

I have a mac mini with an i7 dual core processor. It is perceptably slower than my macbook pro with a quad core i7. Does the mac mini server have the same hardware configuation as the regular mac mini with server software or is the hardware different (aside from the i7 quad core and dual hard drives)? I want a mini with a quad core i7...

Your assumption is correct. The server does however only
have the Intel HD3000 graphics like the base model with
no option, at this time, for the discrete graphics chip. So,
depending on what you are using it for, that could be a deal
breaker. Remember that your MBP does have a discrete
graphics chip.
I have a 2011 Mini Server connected to a Thunderbolt display
that gets used as an engineering workstation and general
personal use (some photo editing, LP restoraton, general
internet browsing). You simply just not enable any of the
server services. I find the combination to work quite well
for my purposes. I also have a 13" 2.7 GHz i7 Macbook Pro
which is pretty much strictly for work. As far as CPU
power it is pretty much equivelent to your Mini. For the most
part I find the Mini does outperfom my MBP. I heavily use
Parallels and Windows7 virtual machines, so the more cores
the better.
So, If you do a lot of CPU intensive stuff that is multithreaded,
the Server may help. If it is graphics intensive and your software
heavily leaverages the GPU, you may actually take a hit on
performance.

Change in hardware key on new installation with same SID

Dear Experts,
Background:
We installed SAP Netweaver 7.3 EHP1 on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 and applied SAP License on it.
So there was a specific SID, Hardware key and Installation No to our installation.
After few months our Server machine got crashed and we formatted it.
Problem:
Now we want to install SAP Netweaver 7.3 EHP1 again on same Server machine.
Here question is:
1. Will the Hardware Key be same if I install SAP Netweaver 7.3 EHP1 with the same SID as it was before ?
Note: We want to apply the same license that was there before the crash. But we can apply same license if and only if after installing with same SID as before, system generates the same Hardware Key as before Crash !!
Other Information:
Information that we got from SAP Note (94998 - Requesting license keys and deleting systems ) that :
" For the following data changes, you require a new license key:
Customer hardware key - database - installation number - system ID.
Thanks in advance for your apt responses.
Muddassar Khan

Hi Muddassar,
With OS reinstallation , the HW Key will change.
I suggest you apply for a new License with the new Hardware Key.
Was this a Test System??
You said after few Months , the system Crashed.
Have you taken a Backup (Windows System State) ??
Regards,
Ashish .A. Poojary

ITunes randomly stops playing purchases that have previously viewed on the same hardware. It has an error message about HD. How can this issue be resolved? What information is available besides the "learn more" option that does not deal with the problem?

iTunes randomly stops playing purchases that have previously viewed on the same hardware. It has an error message about HD. How can this issue be resolved? What information is available besides the "learn more" option that does not deal with the problem?
Many people have the same problem. However, there is little or nothing readily available to users. This problem has existed for two or more years. Does anyone have anything to offer about this disturbing problem?

Thanks for the suggestion kcell. I've tried both versions
9.0.115 and 9.0.124 and both fail with the policy permission error.
I also tried with and without your crossdomain.xml file but
with the same result. It looks like this file is intended for URL
policy, instead of socket policy. Recently Adobe separated the two.
When I run with the files installed on my dev PC, it does
work, which makes sense because the flash player isn't loaded from
an unknown domain.
I did get one step closer. If a crossdomain.xml in the server
root exists and the socketpolicy file is loaded from the app folder
then the first two warnings disappear. The logs now show:
OK: Root-level SWF loaded:
https://192.168.2.5/trunk/myapp.swf
OK: Policy file accepted: https://192.168.2.5/crossdomain.xml
OK: Policy file accepted:
https://192.168.2.5/trunk/socketpolicy.xml
Warning: Timeout on xmlsocket://192.168.2.5:843 (at 3
seconds) while waiting for socket policy file. This should not
cause any problems, but see
http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files
for an explanation.
Warning: [strict] Ignoring policy file with incorrect syntax:
xmlsocket://192.168.2.5:993
Error: Request for resource at xmlsocket://192.168.2.5:993 by
requestor from https://192.168.2.5/trunk/myapp.swf is denied due to
lack of policy file permissions.
Which basically says, everything is okay, but you stay out
anyway.
PS: I found the XML schema files here:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/fplayer9_security_02.html
and the socket policy schema:
http://www.adobe.com/xml/schemas/PolicyFileSocket.xsd.
UPDATE: When serving up the policy file on port 843 using the
example perl script then the socket connection seems to be accepted
and the connect succeeds. After that flex hangs trying to logon to
the IMAP server.

BO XI R2 and BO XI 3.1 on same hardware?

Hi,
Here is the scenario...
We have a server running XI R2 SP3 and have been told we need to run XI 3.1 SP3 to support new Windows 7 clients.
Will XI 3.1 sit on the same hardware as XI R2? I'm aware that I'll need to change some of the default ports to get it to work but I do not want to do an upgrade without testing first!
Any help greatfully received.

Hi Paul,
I hope I read your question right!
Yes, It is possible to run XIR2 and 3.1 on the same server although it's not recommended by BO. You will need to make sure they are both pointing to different CMS databases and different FRS repositories, like you already mentioned you will need to specify different ports for the CMS db and Tomcat.
Why not uninstall Business Objects XI R2 in your BO development environment or a spare server (if you have one), and do a clean install of XI 3.1 SP3.
Tip: If you were already having performance issues with your XI R2 environment, I would seriously consider upgrading the hardware. XI 3.1 needs a bit more RAM and CPU than XI R2
Regards
Rim Geurts

How to create device IDs with same name

i am using SE 3310 and its creating different device ids for each node sharing it . since I will be building a RAC enviornment I need these IDs/name to be same .
for example on one node the lun id is /dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s6 but the same lun id on node 2 is /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0s6.
In past with an old storage array I fixed this issue by creating links in /dev/rdsk for c3t0d0s6 ---> c2t0d0s6.
my question is : is there a way in SE3310 that device ids get created with same name or do i still have to rely on creating these soft links ?
thanks
Note: since i need the answer to this quickly i will wait a while and then post this question in other forums and i will update the question here with the answer .

This could be a Solaris (I presumed) O.S. question rather than SE3310 or storage question.
The logical device (/dev/[r]dsk/*) is the work of the O.S. when it first configures the device, in this case the LUN from your SE3310.   I can go in depth on how the cX number happens (due to device probe order, driver differences, history of device discovery due to need of persistent device naming, etc...) but ... it's a really long story and is really quite irrelevant and most people should not be interested...
If you have COMPLETELY identical servers, i.e. identical hardware down to specific HBA in specific slot are the same,   and if you make sure that luns are presented to all servers exactly the same way, same order, and any changes are seen by all servers in the same sequence, in theory, all /dev/rdsk/* devices will be consistent across servers.
But that's still rather irrelevant.    Application that is designed to work in a redundant environment should not be dependent on logical devices like /dev/rdsk being the same.
So ... in effect this is also not a question for the Solaris forum, but rather a question for those familiar with RAC, how to configure such that device access is done "safely" through actually identifying the lun rather than assuming /dev/rdsk are consistent.

Two Messages with same Message ID in SXMB_MONI

hi,
in moni,for a particular interface we found 2 messsages with the same message id.all the values in the columns are same exact for the column "Pipeline" which is having the values "CENTRAL" and "PE_ADAPTER" for these 2 messages.
there are no multiple receivers.one single receiver for this interface.
do you have any idea why we got 2 messages with same msg id even when receiver is single?
Regards,
Anu

Hi Anu,
In scenarios where you use Integration Process(BPM) leads to such situations where you have multiple entries for same message.
In your case CENTRAL is the pipeline on the Integration Server that actually performs the message processing and PE_ADAPTER is your process engine pipeline but MessageID is the same.
Also you can use the audit log from the runtime work bench (RWB) to look into the details of that particular message to get the relevant information about it.
Regards,
Jitender

More Table Blocks in 11g with same number of rows as in 9i

I was using SQL performance analyzer to compare performance difference between 9i and 11g databases.
For this purpose I generated a trace file in 9i database and used it to build STS in 11g database.
After runing two trials and comparison the report showed performance regression (comparing "buffer gets") while using following SQL statement
*"SELECT * FROM EMP";*
There were total 14 rows in emp table in both databases( i.e 9i and 11g)
There was no plan change for above SQL statement in 11g database but still there was performance regression in 11g.
After querying dba_tables view for number of blocks in emp table on both sides i found that EMP table in 9i database had 1 block where as in 11g emp table had 5 blocks (Even after using alter table emp move;)
I am unable to understand why emp table has more number of blocks in 11g with same number of rows as in 9i emp table?

user8916506 wrote:
Below query was executed in 9i database.
SQL> select extent_management,initial_extent,allocation_type from dba_tablespaces where tablespace_name='SYSTEM';
EXTENT_MAN INITIAL_EXTENT ALLOCATIO
LOCAL 65536 SYSTEM
Results shows that SYSTEM tablespace in 9i database is locally managed.
Where as results of below query from 11g database is indicating that users tablespace in 11g is also locally managed.
SQL> select extent_management,initial_extent,allocation_type from dba_tablespaces where tablespace_name='USERS';
EXTENT_MAN INITIAL_EXTENT ALLOCATIO
LOCAL 65536 SYSTEMGood to see that you also picked up the allocation_type at the same time.
So you have shown that the discrepancy between 9i and 11g isn't down to the difference in extent management.
Are there any other differences between the tablespaces when you compare 9i system with non-system, and 9i system with 11g non-system ? (Hint - we have an anomaly with space allocation.)
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
Author: <b><em>Oracle Core</em></b>

HELP! Low Q3 bench score of 845GMAX

help me please!
I got low QUAKE3 bench score of 288 fps (Q3 v 1.17 DEMO1 Normal 640x480x16 + set s_initsound 0,+set cd_nocd 1). I'm expecting a score of 300+fps.
My spec.
- MSI 845g Max-L bios ver 1.3
- Intel Northwood 1.60A @ 2.48 Ghz (155mhz fsb QPB) @ 1.6Vcore (1.564-1.580 actual)
- 256 MB Samsung DDR333 @ 206mhzx2 (412 DDR) @ 2.7v timings cas 2.5/3/3/6/ IOQ 8
- Inno3D Geforce 4 ti4200 @ 310/600 detonator 29.42
- 40GB Maxtor d740 7200rpm
- 300watts PSU
- SBLive Mplayer
- Intel inf ver 1003 (latest), Intel Application Accelerator v 2.2
- Windows XP pro (no backround apps runnning/ System restore disabled)
other score:
Sisoft Sandra 2002 sp1
ALU/FPU -- 4864/3024
multimedia -- 9793/12229
mem -- 3135/3137 (nearly reached RDRAM 1066 scores 3200+/3200+)
PC 2002
cpu -- 6072
mem -- 6255
3DMark 2002 build 330
11766
thanks!

hello,
I tried 1024x768 and it gave me a score of only 250 fps (Normal, texture color set to default).
I read somewhere in the net (also pls see http://www.anandtech.com/www.tomshardwareguide.com) of Intel 845G motherboard and MSI's 845G max getting a 283+ fps at 1024x768 Normal and 300+ fps at 640x480 Normal with the ff. spec:
Intel Northwood 2.4B 133x4 FSB (mine is 2.48 @ 155x4)
256MB DDR333 (mine is DDR412)
Geforce4 ti 4600 128mb (mine is GF4 ti 4200 @310/600 64mb)
Also note these scores at 640x480 Normal
GF4 ti4200 64mb @ 275/550 = 288fps
GF4 ti4200 64mb @ 320/600 = 288.5 fps
Video card speed hardly make any difference in my Quake3 score
I need good Quake3 fps... i play a lot of OpenGL games!
thanks

OS 10.8 just installed. "Hot Corner" to put new iMac 2.7 GHz Intel Core i5 to sleep mode doesn't work. Have tried cordless and corded mouse with same result. Momentary sleep, immediate wake. Any idea how to fix?

Set "hot corner" to put iMac to sleep. Doesn't work. Selecting the corner will momentarily put to sleep, but immediately rewakes. Have tried all four corners with same result. Have tried with wireless mouse and with corded mouse with same result. Any ideas as to how to fix?

You've been so great, I want to thank you for all the help over a very frustrating day. Last evening, I redownloaded and installed the fresh copy of Mountain Lion. The problem remained. After installing the new OS 10.8, any clicks on a web page (Firefox browser) didn't open the page, but instead made a copy of the page on the desktop. Felt it must be hardware degrading, so I set up a case with Apple support for today. Early in the diagnostics, I had swapped out for a corded mouse and the problem remained. As a last try, I changed out my wireless mouse for a different wireless mouse. That seems to have done the trick. My Logitech mouse is incompatible with OS 10.8.
Thank you again, so much!
.../awards rkaufmann87 500 points!

Two deductions for invoice with same reason code posted as one line item

Hi
We have a scenario wherein we are taking two or more deductions on the same invoice and are using the same reason code which have a setting of charge off.
SAP system displays the FI posting with same reason codes with charge off setting as one line item.
However we want the FI Posting to display separate line items per deduction and not combine amounts of deductions based on same reason code with charge off setting.
Any comments are appreciated.
Edited by: Kirti Bhardwaj on Jul 24, 2011 9:46 AM

Hi,
you can use different reason codes in distribute differences screen once you have fist selected one reason code for one invoice.

HT1933 The app purchased is not compatible with current hardware, how can I get a refund?

I purchased an app just about an hour ago and it tells me that the app is not compatible with the hardware I already have and in good working order. I already bought an app for the same hardware for my iPhone, it's just different version for the iPad, so I bought it.

Try the 'report a problem' link from your purchase history : log into your account on your computer's iTunes via Store > View My Account (Store > View My Apple ID on iTunes 11) and you should then see a Purchase History section with a 'see all' link to the right of it ; click on that and you should see a list of your purchases ; find that app, click the arrow to the left of it, click the 'Report a Problem' button :
and then the 'Report a Problem' link on its line :
and select 'inadvertently purchased' as the problem and fill in the details (iTunes support should reply within, I think, about 24 hours).

Sample Project with ni hardware using NI-DAQmx Driver

hi, i need a Sample Project with NIi hardware using NI-DAQmx Driver

Please stick to one thread. You've created several that are asking the same thing and the answer remains the same - Help> Find Examples if using LabVIEW. Other programming languages come with their own set of examples.

Creation of BPEL with a WSDL having 2 operations with same name

How to create a BPEL 2.0 from WSDL which is having the +2 operation with Same name+ and we are planing to USE PICK activity but the BPEL is giving error while selecting the operation name
can't create input variable.The selected operation does not have an input message.+
WSDL:Operation
     <wsdl:portType name="ABC">
          *<wsdl:operation name="XYZ"*>
               <wsdl:input name="Request1" message="tns:Request"/>
               <wsdl:output name="Response1" message="tns:Response"/>
          </wsdl:operation>
          *<wsdl:operation name="XYZ">*
               <wsdl:input name="Request2" message="tns:Request"/>
               <wsdl:output name="Response2" message="tns:Response"/>
          </wsdl:operation>
     </wsdl:portType>
Can you please provide the alternate solution if the procedure followed by us is wrong
Thanks in Advance

Hi Preetam,
I believe it's not allowed, use different operation name.
A wsdl:portType in a DESCRIPTION MUST have operations with distinct values for their name attributes.
This applies only to the wsdl:operations within a given wsdl:portType. A wsdl:portType may have wsdl:operations with names that are the same as those found in other wsdl:portTypes.
why do you need multiple operation with same message type?
Regards,
Faiz

Difference of bench scores with same hardware. Why?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for