Difference of Communication Profiles---Provider Systems&Provided Services

When create a provider system,I need a communication profile.When create a business scenario in "Business Scenario Communication",I can also assign a communication profile to provided services.So what's the difference of these two communication profiles,and must I use the same communication profile for the provider system and provided services in it?

Hi,
from my understanding, i take it like this.
when you assign profile to provider system, which means you will communicate with this system using the configuration set in the profile.
when you assign the profile to the service, which means the service want to be communicated in the way that are set in the profile.
so if you assign the profile to both service and provide system, they are perfectly matched.
Best regards,
John

Similar Messages

7.2 Trial: Assign Provider system to service group

Hi Experts,
I've created a BPM with an automated activity that shall call a web service provided by a CAF application (everything takes place on a CE 7.2 Trial server).
In WS navigator the CAF web service works.
In my BPM the process always gets stuck in the autmated activity (without any error message).
Now I've tried to setup some system configurations:
1. Creating provider system (in SOA Management/Technical Configuration/System connections)
The communication profile is SAP_DEFAULT_PROFILE, the service source is the service registry.
Pinging the system works, so I guess that it's ok.
2. Setting up the application communication (in SOA Management/Application and Scenario Communication/Application Communication):
There I have to Software components in the list: a) testblcafear and b)testpr~pm
For a) I've assigned SAP_DEFAULT_PROFILE as profile
For b) I tried to add the provider system to the service group, but after saving I always get a red light and the following log message:
Configuration of logical ports for [test_SG] Service Group failed with [
Service [TestService] not found in the registry publications for the assigned provider [CE1 on pcccsn103]. Check if the service is published in the Services Registry. Check if the system SLD ID for the service publication matches the System SLD ID for the assigned provider. Provider System SLD ID: [CE1.SystemHome.pcccsn103.Java]
Service Group:[test_SG]
Service Group application: [test.com/travelmanagementprpm]
Service Reference application: [test.com/travelmanagementprpm]
Configuration Scenarion: [COMPOSITE_APPLICATIONS_CONFIGURATION_SCENARIO]
] error. For more information refer to the trace with ID [001EC96B0BCF00070000005D00001670]. Details: [CE1.SystemHome.pcccsn103.Java] provider system, [test.com/testprpm] Service Group application
The service is in the SR, I can see it under SR/service definitions.
How can it be that the SLD ID is different for provider and and receiver? In both cases it's the same system!
I've checked our SLD and we don't have a system number (because it's a trial license). Could that be the reason?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Sowmya
Say me one think, do you use a trial version of CE?
I have the same problem with the trial version. However, today I've deployed my application in a official released version of CE, and this error don't occur. Maybe this is an error of trial version.
Regards
Marcos.

Provider system on service registry

Hello experts,
I am facing an issue when i try to configure a provider system for Service registry.
I get an error "Specified provider system is not published in the Services Registry."
Please let me know as how to configure a provider system on service registry.
Regards,
Vivek

Hi Vivek,
Refer to guide below from around page 16, it will help you:
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/business-process-management/business-process-modeling/creating%20bpm%20process%20with%20human%20and%20automated%20activities.pdf]
Regards, Trevor

Problem Occured When assigning Provider system to service Group

hi,
Im trying to invoke external webservice into webdypro project(CE 7.1 ehp1) using Adaptive Webservice model.
-->I created Service group for that webdynpro application.
-->I created Provider system.(it is in active state only).
-->when im trying to assign the Provider system to the Previously created service group,
its giving the following exception.
An Unexpected ER Technical Exception occurred .
any idea on this issue?
Thanks & Regards
Sowmya.T

Hi Sowmya
Say me one think, do you use a trial version of CE?
I have the same problem with the trial version. However, today I've deployed my application in a official released version of CE, and this error don't occur. Maybe this is an error of trial version.
Regards
Marcos.

How to get the UDDI Key to publish a service provider system in SR?

Hi,
I am following instruction in appendix 1 & 2 of the white paper at https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1079b1af-dcb7-2b10-9ebb-eafcaa3cbbea?overridelayout=true
trying to publish a service provider system into the service registry. One thing not clear to me is how to get the uddikey as needed in step 6 in appendix 1.
My service registry is in a PI 7.1 SP4 system. I followed the instruction in appendix 2 but there is no uddi key displayed in the General tab. Please help.
Regards,
Jiannan
Paragraph extracted from the whitepaper:
There may be cases in which the NWA logical settings do not match the Services Repository
settings when Visual Composer is trying to locate the enterprise services. Such cases can occur
when there is no SLD ID definition of the physical system in the Services Repository.
Currently, Visual Composer cannot search for services on a physical system with an empty SLD ID
(which is not a valid one).
To obtain this capability, the following steps should be performed to generate the necessary data
for each system with a non-valid SLD ID, so that Visual Composer can search for services over it.
1.Log on to http://<serverName>:<serverPort>/WSNavigator.
2.Select the Services Registry radio button.
3.In the Find field, enter sr and choose Go.
4.Select the ServicesRegistrySi line and choose Next.
5.Under the Operation Name, search for the publishPhysicalSystems operation, select it and choose Next.
6.Fill the service information parameters with the following (see Appendix 2 for details on how to get this information) :
6.1.Click the + icon in the physical system[].
6.2.Deselect the Classifications checkbox.
6.3.Click the + icon in the classificationReferenceGroups[].
6.4.Click the + icon in the classificationReferences[].
6.5.Deselect the classificationSystemKey checkbox.
6.6.Deselect the uddiKey checkbox and enter the value <localUddiKey>.
6.7.Deselect the value checkbox and enter the value <localSystemHostName>.
6.8.Deselect the host checkbox and enter the value <localHostName>.
6.9.Deselect the physicalSystemKey checkbox.
6.10.Deselect the logical key checkbox and enter the value <System name>.<SystemHome>.<host name>.
6.11.Deselect the systemName checkbox and enter the value <system name>.
6.12.Deselect the type checkbox and enter the value 2.

Hi Jiannan,
No worries, you can go to UDDI client from the main page of PI i.e. http://<serverName>:<serverPort>/
And you use the search function for the TModel for your Physical System. Search parameters can use the % wildcard.
Hit the search and you find the UDDI Key for the Physical System.
Cheers.
Hemant Chahal

Business Service , Service Group and Provider System for CE 7.2

Hi
I need documentation about Business Service , Service Group and Provider System for CE 7.2.
Att,
Marco

Did you get one? I need too.
In SAP Help Portal there are a large quantity of documents, such as:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce72/helpdata/en/88/a552908d4c44dc99b3ec247069921e/frameset.htm
But the content is so much and I do not know with which part I should start.
In the web blog of Ms. Stefanie Bacher:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50d70a19-45a3-2b10-bba0-807d819daf46?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
she has mentioned how to create a service group shortly. But I cannot follow it in my NWDS CE7.1.
Anyone could give me some tipps, how to resolve authorization problem of consuming web services.
Thanks and regards
Rene

Service Groups in CE 7.1.1 - ES Workplace as Provider System?

All,
I'm currently trying to set up ES Workplace as a provider system for multiple services as a Service Group under CE 7.1.1
I assume this requires setting up sr.esworkplace.sap.com as a technical system in the SLD. Is this correct?
Where do I find the connection details for the SLD?
What's the WSIL I have to specify in the services search settings? I've tried http://erp.esworkplace.sap.com/sap/bc/srt/wsil without success.
Many thanks!
Michael

Hi Michael,
Have you had a look at the following?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce711/helpdata/en/84/c5f9c81f8d4de28a20f5dca473017c/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce711/helpdata/en/28/1b90eacdd748a999ad532f8d6833cc/frameset.htm
Cheers
Phillip

Problem in adding a new web service provider system in NWA SOA

Hello,
Portal version : CE7.3 EHP1 SP9
I am trying to add a web service system in "NWA > SOA > Technical Configuration > System Connections > Provider Systems > New".
I have web service WSDL URL with me which is like: -
https://webservicehostname/dswsbobje/qaawsservices/biws?WSDL=1&cuid=AfO9g_JmE0ZOiZzdvNtCbxg
When I enter this URL in input field "WSIL URL" and click on "Next", I get error saying: -
"Cannot connect to https://webservicehostname:443/dswsbobje/qaawsservices/biws?WSDL=1&cuid=AfO9g_JmE0ZOiZzdvNtCbxg
HTTP Message : Unable to connect to webservicehostname:443 - Connection refused".
(attached screenshot)
Now, it puzzles me that why & how it is appending colon & port number in the entered URL as protocol is already https?
Basis & network team is looking into connectivity related settings, but from my side, I wanted to answer/know why & how this port number is getting appended in entered URL and how to prevent it.
Any ideas/help please.
Thanks & Regards,
Amey Mogare

Hello Atul,
In WSDL URL and content itself, there is no port number specified as protocol used is https.
(screenshot).
The problem is, after clicking on "Next", system is somehow inserting port number in between URL which it ideally should not as URL protocol is https.
Thanks & Regards,
Amey Mogare

EE is committed to providing excellent "Customer Service"

I act on behalf of the account holder, my sister Ms Katharine ***** who is unable to deal with the account due to being registered with mental illness. She has difficulty processing too much information and at times back ground noise and general conversation can confuse her. Therefore things like dealing with bills and accounts, filing in forms and understanding what is happening around her, can be difficult. With this in mind I act on her behalf for all her accounts, mobile, broadband, Tv, Gas Electric etc.
She has been an EE customer for 20 months now and only has a rolling one month Mobile Broadband account with EE. She is not a phone customer.
I raised a complaint against a member of staff Ms ****** ***** because she contacted me to appologise for another member of staff who implied they didn't need to deal with me as I wasn't the account holder even though I am named on the account and have only ever been the person who deals with the account. After appologising for that member of staff Ms ***** then proceeded to fabricate details concerning the account and make things up on the telephone as the call proceeded. Bearing in mind she is calling me from the "customer relations" department and has all the time in the world to check the account, confirm accurate details and then call me in her own time, I saw no reason for her to "wing it" and make it up as she went along. I asked her twice if she had checked the account details before calling me and I was twice given the response "thats irrelivant". She clearly wantd to avoid answering that reasonable question. I could clearly tell she had not checked the account and this made the situation more complicated and worse. This was dissapointing considering she was supposed to be calling to resolve an issue and was a representative from the Customer Relations department. Several things she stated during the call did not ring true and it was clear she had called unprepared and was fabricating certain things or making them up as she went along. On this basis I called EE back after she hung up with the intent to raise a complaint against her as I felt Customer Relations should be resolving issues, not making them worse.
Initially when calling EE on Wednesday the 1st July 2015 and speaking to customer services in Darlington, I was told I would be put through to Customer Relations and speak to Ms ****** *****s manager Ms ****** *********.
After explaining that I wished to raise a complaint, I was put on hold while awaiting transfer to the Customer Relations department. On that day alone I was on the phone for 2hours and 34minutes mostly on hold and being transfered between the departments of Darlington, South Wales, New Delhi and North Tyne. I never got through to customer relations. Eventually I was told by a Manager in North Tyne that they would get through to Customer Relations for me and then call me back that day, to save me being on hold any longer. The call back from EE never happened that day. Something I expected as I had been told this four times in the past over the last 20 months and those call backs never happend either. I chased the matter up the following day on Thursday the 2nd of July and that day I spent 2 hours and 17 minutes on the phone. Again mostly on hold or being transfered between departments. Again I was promised a callback later that day and again that never happened that day. An email was sent to the Customer relations department requesting that they contact me directly. I did get through to the "Complaints Escalation" department but they refused to transfer me to the Customer Resolutions department even though thats where three previous staff members said they were transfering me and even confirmed the name of the Manager of that department so there is no confsuion. Needless to say I refused the offer off the call back that hadn't happened on the two previous days or on the four other occassions in the past 20 months. And to be clear I was told that someone would call me back "today".
On Friday the 3rd of July I called again as I had received no reply and spent just over 1hour and 10minutes on the phone. This time I spoke to a lovely Lady called R*** M*** in South Wales and she was extremely polite and genuine which was refreshing and completely unEE like. Although she was unable to help due to the way in which EE set up its complaints system, she was very considerate and understanding of my frustration after 6 hours on the phone over 3 days and still getting nowhere.
On Wednesday the 8th July I received a call back from the original department I was supposed to be put through to (Customer Relations) and spoke to the Manager ******* ******** who was quick to point out that she had "just received the email" sent on Thursday the 2nd of July and was pressing in getting accross her point that she had replied quickly to the email knowing the call was recorded.
The call lasted 30 minutes and I felt from the moment she called, her aim was about resolving the issue with the intent of "closing the complaint" by offering money or requesting "what I would like" as a resolution. I clearly stated the experiences I had over the past three days to raise a complaint and the just over 6 hours on the phone to EE. Again the focus seemed to be to get to the end of the call and close the complaint via an obvious cash offer. On numerous occasions she seemed to want to lead the conversation in that direction yet showed little interest in the actual complaint. It wasn't until I asked her to accomplish what she had initially called me about, namely to listen to my complaint, that she stopped talking and actually listened. Prior to her call three managers, 2 in North Tyne and 1 in Greenoch near Glasgow all stated that the original call I received "would be listened to" and checked for the things I stated in the complaint. Unsurprisingly, when I asked at the end of Ms *******s call, what she made of the conversation when she listned to it, she told me she hadn't listened to it and was unable to, contradicting the three other managers.
When raising the complaint with ****** in North Tyne, he informed me he was taking the matter seriously and was going to raise an internal complaint as per protocal and the Ombudsmans guidelines. I spent just under 15 minutes talking with him. At the end of that call, after he asked "is there anything else I can help you with today", I asked him what the complaint was about. He couldn't tell me and started to list things he was trying to remember from the conversation but none were the actual thing I brought to his attention in the first place. Therefore, how do you take the matter seriously and raise an internal complaint if you can't remember what it is? I seriously doubt that these "internally raised complaints" actually happen and it is convenient just to say they do so that the customer can then be told "but we can't discuss the results with you due to privacy and work environment practices".
I spoke to New Delhi twice while being passed from pilar to post and the line was very bad when being transfered from North Tyne and New Delhi offered to call me back. I explained to the first chap that he couldn't call a mobile broadband device as it is not a phone but the guy persisted and needless to say I received no call back. Ten minutes later, exactly the same situation and this time the chap asked for my mobile number. I gave it to him and he replied "thats not an EE number, sorry I can't help you". He then asked me why I was calling if that wasn't an EE number. I explained the account concerned a mobile broadband device and he said again, "Sorry I can't help you" and terminated the call.
Also while trying to raise the complaint I was told twice that I wasn't the customer. Obviously some people may need the assistance of a carer, social worker, community nurse or family member to help them. This is lost on EE. When they don't know how to handle a complaint, or their hands are tied by interanl system structure or they get caught lying, they resort to the tactic of asking to speak to the account holder or telling me I am not the account holder.
I have also been told on three occasions that I was being transfered to a department that I could not be transfered to. Two managers later told me I should not have been told this and that it is impossible to transfer me to that department. There were numerous other things that happened during the 6 hours on the phone to EE. If I put them in this statement, you wouldn't believe me and think I was making it up. Then again, this EE and I have read some of the other statements on here.... and they don't suprise me either.
I was offered £10 on the account for my time on the phone by a manager. By that point I really didn't care at all or bother to wuestion if it had actually been put on the account. I declined any credit or cash offer from Ms ******* ***** in her call back as I felt the service was so appauling and the structure of making a complaint to lengthy and unreasonable. I didn't wish to be just another complaint "satisfactorily deal with" by being "paid off". I have also experienced such customer service in the past and was offered a £10 goodwill gesture. It is clear to me that EE resolve complaints and internal issues by paying off customers (they call it resolving issues), rather than properly handling complaints and taking them seriously. EEs complaints system is "designed" to be difficult to raise a complaint or raise it to another level. Something the Ombudsman brought to their attention in the recent fine they gave to EE. Clearly EE wouldn't have so many complaints if it provided a customer service that was fair and easy to use and had little to complain about in the first place. Even during the call back I was told that Vodaphone was most complained about company, yet the statistics from the Ombudsman for 2015 clearly show that EE has received the most complains concerning Broadband. The thing I was calling about. Even during a callback to resolve an issue, EE still were trying say someone else was worse and deflect attention.
I was very, very happy to see the £1 million pound fine they received from the Ombudsman on Friday. Before I am insulted by any more EE staff memebers, who tell me I have the right to leave at any time, as happened twice while raising the complaint, I'd like to point out that I am happy with the product and the price I pay for it. The Product isn't the problem. It's the Customer Service.
Just because I am happy with the product, it doesn't mean I forfeit my right to complain about reasonable issues. In short I feel, TalkTalk are just inept and a bit clueless whereas Everything Everywhere and deceitful and intentionally pervasive when handling complaints. I also feel that the actual amount of complaints may be far higher than the statistics show and that customers give up complaining when being left on hold for so long or realising the complaints procedure is worthless and too difficult to use. This then keeps the amount of complaints lower than they actually are.
The service I received trying to raise a reasonable complaint was atrocious and in My personal view, clearly reflects why so many EE customers complain about the company and the Ombudsman fined it so heavily. Clearly they have not learnt their lesson, despite their statement on Friday that that fine was for past issues. I would happily see EEs licence to opperate removed or atleast brought in to question based on this and other customers experiences. If you have a complaint, don't let EE tell you, "its only you" or "its just your opinion". It isn't.... And the Ombudsman says so.
This was easily the worse Customer Service experience I have ever had in my life.
8th July 2015

Hi ,
I am very sorry for all the problems you have stated in the post.
Can you advise me what the query was? I will try help as best I can.
Thanks.

Providing system configuration info in an automated installer manifest.

In Solaris 11 Express it was possible to embed a system configuration xml file within the automated installer file. The documentation for this is here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19963-01/html/820-6566/customsc.html
However this functionality seems to be missing from 11.1 at the moment. I get xml validation errors if I try to use embedded system configuration xml. Does anyone know of a way to do this? We would like to automate Solaris 11.1 installs without having to run an auto install server.

Please see the 11.1 documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28980/useaipart.html
System configuration profiles are no longer embedded in the AI manifest but are provided in one or more separate files.
Providing System Configuration Instructions
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28980/glgeh.html#ai3sc
Associating Client-Specific Configuration Instructions With Install Services
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28980/administer.html#gliea
Configuring the Client System
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28980/syscfg-1.html

The type '*', provided as the Service attribute value in the ServiceHost directive, or provided in the configuration element * could not be found

I have a provider hosted app in sharepoint which works locally without problem. I followed this tutorial to publish it to azure
http://blogs.technet.com/b/sharepointdevelopersupport/archive/2013/09/05/how-to-deploy-a-provider-hosted-app-as-an-azure-site.aspx
However after publishing the webservice doesnt work I get this exception:
[InvalidOperationException: The type 'x.IntranetWeb.Services.AppEventReceiver', provided as the Service attribute value in the ServiceHost directive, or provided in the configuration element system.serviceModel/serviceHostingEnvironment/serviceActivations could not be found.]
System.ServiceModel.Activation.ServiceHostFactory.CreateServiceHost(String constructorString, Uri[] baseAddresses) +62739
System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.CreateService(String normalizedVirtualPath, EventTraceActivity eventTraceActivity) +1429
System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.ActivateService(ServiceActivationInfo serviceActivationInfo, EventTraceActivity eventTraceActivity) +52
System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.EnsureServiceAvailable(String normalizedVirtualPath, EventTraceActivity eventTraceActivity) +598
[ServiceActivationException: The service '/Services/AppEventReceiver.svc' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation. The exception message is: The type 'x.IntranetWeb.Services.AppEventReceiver', provided as the Service attribute value in the ServiceHost directive, or provided in the configuration element system.serviceModel/serviceHostingEnvironment/serviceActivations could not be found..]
System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result) +486572
System.ServiceModel.Activation.HostedHttpRequestAsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result) +174
System.ServiceModel.Activation.ServiceHttpModule.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult ar) +345998
System.Web.AsyncEventExecutionStep.OnAsyncEventCompletion(IAsyncResult ar) +9683593
My web.config which I didnt touch.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<configuration>
<appSettings>
<add key="webpages:Version" value="3.0.0.0" />
<add key="webpages:Enabled" value="false" />
<add key="ClientValidationEnabled" value="true" />
<add key="UnobtrusiveJavaScriptEnabled" value="true" />
<add key="ClientId" value="xx-04e7-4caf-854a-89c20577d7da" />
<add key="ClientSecret" value="ljguTvxHR+xx+Pl1IMg1Hjt5rsQ=" />
</appSettings>
<system.web>
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5" />
<httpRuntime targetFramework="4.5" />
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
<runtime>
<assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1">
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity name="Newtonsoft.Json" culture="neutral" publicKeyToken="30ad4fe6b2a6aeed" />
<bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-6.0.0.0" newVersion="6.0.0.0" />
</dependentAssembly>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity name="System.Web.Optimization" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
<bindingRedirect oldVersion="1.0.0.0-1.1.0.0" newVersion="1.1.0.0" />
</dependentAssembly>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity name="WebGrease" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
<bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-1.5.2.14234" newVersion="1.5.2.14234" />
</dependentAssembly>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity name="System.Web.Helpers" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
<bindingRedirect oldVersion="1.0.0.0-3.0.0.0" newVersion="3.0.0.0" />
</dependentAssembly>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity name="System.Web.WebPages" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
<bindingRedirect oldVersion="1.0.0.0-3.0.0.0" newVersion="3.0.0.0" />
</dependentAssembly>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity name="System.Web.Mvc" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
<bindingRedirect oldVersion="1.0.0.0-5.2.0.0" newVersion="5.2.0.0" />
</dependentAssembly>
</assemblyBinding>
</runtime>
<system.serviceModel>
<bindings>
<basicHttpBinding>

<binding name="secureBinding">
<security mode="Transport" />
</binding>
</basicHttpBinding>
</bindings>
<protocolMapping>
<add binding="basicHttpBinding" scheme="https" bindingConfiguration="secureBinding" />
</protocolMapping>
</system.serviceModel>
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" />
<remove name="OPTIONSVerbHandler" />
<remove name="TRACEVerbHandler" />
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*." verb="*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
and a piece of the code of the remote event receiver
<%@ ServiceHost Language="C#" Debug="true" Service="x.IntranetWeb.Services.AppEventReceiver" CodeBehind="AppEventReceiver.svc.cs" %>
namespace x.IntranetWeb.Services
public class AppEventReceiver : IRemoteEventService
Follow me on Twitter
levalencia Blog

Hi,
The issue here is the mapping of the interface to the service in question, and usually points to a possible mistype or rename of something within your service architecture.
You need to make sure your namespace and service name here match your service name itself.
For detailed information, you could refer to:
https://haddicus.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/service-attribute-value-not-found-wcf-services/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9557221/the-type-restservice-weddingservice-provided-as-the-service-attribute-value-i
Regards

How to publish a PI7.1 System in SR to create PRovider System in CE7.1

Hi All,
We have CE7.1 EHP1 System. When we try to create a provider system for a PI7.1 system in our landscape, the PI system is not available in the help entries.
If we proceed wiht manual entry, in the end it thows the error " Provider system not published in service registry".
Kindly let me know how to publish a PI7.1 system to the Service Registry so that we can create a Provider system in CE7.1.
Thanks and Regards,
Raghavan

Hi
Have a look on given threads
[Publish services from PI 7.1 to the Service Registry|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3417700)ID1123979950DB11040186000318583423End?blog=/pub/wlg/8788]
[DISCOVERY SYSTEM|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/108ef7ba-8abd-2a10-f787-d5f29c5f1b88&overridelayout=true][Netweaver CE ESR & SR|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3417700)ID1123979950DB11040186000318583423End?blog=/pub/wlg/8725]
Best Regards
Satish Kumar

How to Get user profile properties in provider -cloud hosted app in sharepoint online - office 365 using REST API?

How to Get user profile properties in provider -cloud hosted app in sharepoint online - office 365 using REST API?
any idea?

Hi,
From your description, my understanding is that you want to get user profile properties in provider-hosted app in SharePoint online using REST API.
Here is sample code for getting user profile properties:
http://www.vrdmn.com/2013/07/sharepoint-2013-get-userprofile.html
Here is a blog below about accessing data from the provider-host apps:
http://dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2014/07/accessing-sharepoint-data-from-provider-hosted-apps-use-the-right-context/
Best Regards,
Vincent Han
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Portal 6.3.1 "Communications Express Address Book" provider

Hi,
Does anyone have working setup with "Communications Express Address Book" provider from PS 6.3.1 ? I'm having a problem to get it to connect to UWC address book in my JES3 test installation. All other connections to "old" address book, "old" and uwc-type mail, calendar, IM are working fine.
Thanks,
Mareks

Hi,
Thanks for yours replay, i have installed:
jdk-6u16-solaris-i586
jdk-6u16-solaris-x64
anubis# pkginfo| grep JDK
system SUNWj5cfg JDK 5.0 Host Config. (1.5.0_20)
system SUNWj5dev JDK 5.0 Dev. Tools (1.5.0_20)
system SUNWj5rt JDK 5.0 Runtime Env. (1.5.0_20)
system SUNWj6cfg JDK 6.0 Host Config. (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6dev JDK 6.0 Dev. Tools (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6dmo JDK 6.0 Demo Programs (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6dmx JDK 6.0 64-bit Demo Programs (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6dvx JDK 6.0 64-bit Dev. Tools (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6jmp JDK 6.0 Man Pages: Japan (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6man JDK 6.0 Man Pages (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6rt JDK 6.0 Runtime Env. (1.6.0_16)
system SUNWj6rtx JDK 6.0 64-bit Runtime Env. (1.6.0_16)
Should i downgrade my java ?
Thanks,
Mariusz

GTC Connector using SPML Format Provider and Web Services Transport Provide

Hello All,
Did any body create a GTC connector which uses SPML Format for Format Provider and Web Services format for Transport Provider?
Is there any doc which talks about the same?
I need to provision to a system over web services and I thought GTC using the above formats should be an easy approach. Am I right?
I was trying to follow:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/doc.1111/e14309/devgtc.htm#BABDFDFE
But Iam getting lost in the immerse details.
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
I tried creating one and am getting the following error while provisioning:
SPML Response failed V2 schema validation
Th eoracle document says :Ensure that the SPML response returned by the target system conforms to the SPML V2 standard specification
Please help me with the same. What is it that needs to be done here.
Thanks
WIP

Difference of Communication Profiles---Provider Systems&Provided Services

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for