Difference of profit center between ledger 0 (FI-GL) and other ledgers

Hello all,
I have a problem of discrepency between FI-GL and other ledgers (8A and specific ledgers) on profit center data.
My case :
I post an incoming invoice with MIRO, this generates a FI posting Vendor to Expenses :
Account                Profit center               Origin of profit center
Expense                3630                           coming from the cost center
Vendor                  3630                         FI substitution rule that puts the expense line profit center on the vendor line profit center
Postings on other ledgers are also created automatically in real time :
- a posting in ledger 8A for profit center accounting
- postings in specific special ledgers we have
In these postings we find this
Account                Profit center               Origin of profit center
Expense                3630                           coming from the cost center
Vendor                  3637                        ?
This problem appears only on Vendor or Customer line items.
My questions :
Why is the Vendor line item profit center is different between FI-GL and other ledger ? In my GCF3 customization, I have asked to transfer my profit center form FI-GL to my specific ledgers directly, so why isn't this happening ?
If the profit center is not coming from the FI-GL posting, where is it coming from ?
Thanks all for your answers !
Edited by: O_HAFSA on Apr 29, 2010 5:23 PM

Check the following SAP Note :
Note 122008 - Activate transfer prices/mult.valuation approaches (https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/122008)
Also check the related notes.
You may also take a look at the following links :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/eb/13736a43c411d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/e2/49e4a52a4a47eea82ffc2d5932cd1c/content.htm
Ravi

Similar Messages

Materials management small differences - DIF - Profit Center assignment.

Hi,
We have created one G/L for posting the u201CMaterials management small differencesu201D at the time of generating MIRO document via transaction u201CDIFu201D in Tcode - OBYC.
For e.g. if the GR amount is 90 and IR (Invoice received from party) is of Rs. 91/- or vice-versa then for posting the difference of Rs. 1/- we have made the above assignment.
System is generating the line item for the u201CSmall Diff -Invoice Verificationu201D but posting automatically to a "Dummy Profit Center u201C in the absence of any other data.
Our point is that we want to change the profit center to the related Business area, which is there in the line item of u201CSmall Diff -Invoice Verificationu201D account.
We tried the FI substitution (Tcode u2013 GGB1/ OBBH) for the Profit Center derivation on the basis of Business Area but that is working with the FI documents (Manual FI entry) only and not with the automatic line generation like MIRO in the above case.
Later on I tried Tcode u2013 OKB9, but in that case after giving business area wise cost center substitution, system is correctly showing the entry (in simulation mode of MIRO transaction) in the required Cost Center & on that basis in the Profit Center, but still system requires u201CCO-Objectu201D
Initially we tried other way of creating a Cost Element under the category of u201C11 u2013 Revenueu201D to maintain Business Area u2013 Profit Center link but still in that case also it requires co-object hence turned to changing the Cost Element Category to u201C1 u2013 Primary Costu201D for capturing Profit center on the basis of Business Area u2013 Cost Center link since basically G/L u2013 u201Csmall Diff -Invoice Verificationu201D we have created under u201CExpense Groupu201D.
Our requirement is to post the entry in related profit center per Business Area in the line item of "Small Diff -Invoice Verification" since there are 6 to 7 business areas, which are active in system.
Regards,
Shridhar

Hi,
Thanks for the reply. But I would like to correct you. I have mentioned in my subject line - "DIF" i.e the Transaction Key maintained in Transaction Code - OBYC for posting the small difference (Between GR and IR values) arriving at the time of MIRO transaction posting.
Now meanwhile I have come across u201CSAP Note : 32654u201D which mentioned that "Account assignment for the transaction (KDR, DIF, UPF) on the highest level i.e. the 1st screen where we set the Cost Center or Profit Center assignment to Cost Element with Acct Assignment details (1 or 2 or 3) is possible.
Same is not possible on details level means Acct Assignment details level per Valuation Area or Business Area for Cost Center or Profit Center linkage (2nd screen of OKB9).
Please do correct me if I am making any wrong statement.
Now would like to have an advise about the transaction Code - OKC9 with the scenario (MIRO document u2013 Dummy Profit center linkage) that I have mentioned above.
Do I require to maintain OKB9 (At highest level) and then need to work out CO- Substitution via OKC9 ? Or OKC9 is enough to cover my scenario ?
Do any body have a knowledge about that? Points will be assigned.
Regards,
Shridhar

Difference in Profit Center Document and CO-PA Document

Hi,
We are getting difference in Profit Center Document and CO-PA Document Cancelled Sales Invoice.
Sales Accounts GL:
Profit Center Document amount in Sales Accounts GL: 558095.04
CO-PA amount in Sales Accounts GL: 558095.15
In Sales Invoice, Exchange Rate is maintained as 7.75132
Invoice Amount is 72000 USD. So the Amount calculated should be 558095.04.
In Accounting Document the Amount posted as 558095.15 for the GL Sales Account.
But in Cancelled Sales Invoice, Amount posted is 558095.04 in GL Sales Account.
So Profit Center Document is picking the Amount 558095.04, but CO-PA document is picking wrong amount i.e from Sales Invoice and not from Cancelled Invoice.
Please help me to understand why Co-PA Document is fetching amount from Sales Invoice and not Cancelled Invoice.
Also why there is difference in Sales Order Invoice and Cancelled Sales Oder invoice Amount.
Regards,
Debashri Dutta

Hi
Yes you can transfer the planning data from COPA to ECPCA. You can do the configuration at
SPRO->Controlling->Profitability Analysys->Planning->Integrated Planning->Set up transfer of planning data to ECPCA/FIGL
Then you can use TCode KE1V to transfer the planning data.
Regards,
Suraj
Edited by: Suraj Ramamurthy on Nov 13, 2008 1:59 PM

Difference in Profit Center Payables report and Vendor Balance report

Hi Gurus,
After posting an invoice, i can see that invoice posted if i execute FBL1N or FBL3N but if i execute Profit Center Payables report, balances are not updated.
Is there any PC Push facility in SAP, which updates the balance of PC Payable report after executing this PC Push? Please let me know.
Thank You
Regards,

Dear,
Are you able to see the General Ledger View of that entry?
mukesh

Difference in Profit center for GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO Transaction

1) We have created material 106267 with material type ROH. We have assigned profit center 1001052999 (common profit center) to material.
2) We have created WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF with profit center 1001052002.
3) We have created PO 4000000236 for account assignment category u2018Qu2019 for the above material with WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF   . After posting GRN for PO 4000000236 we have identified that for GR/IR account profit center is taken from material master & for stock account profit center is taken from WBS element.
Please find the below Flow
In MIGO
Entry
Accounting Document number in Entry View
5000001125
PSKY          G/L Code      Description
         Amount
     Curr.
          Profit Center
     WBS element
89          231101     RAW MATERIAL STOCK     2,000.00     INR          1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
96          162101     GR/IR-Material     -2,000.00     INR          1001052999     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
Document number in Ledger View
L.item     PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
1     89          231101     RAW MATERIAL STOCK     2,000.00     INR          1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
2     96          162101     GR/IR-Material     -2,000.00     INR          1001052999     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
3     50          162001     InterSegment Clrg     -2,000.00     INR          1001052002
4     40          162001     InterSegment Clrg     2,000.00     INR          1001052999
It should take profit center from WBS element for GR/IR account & Stock account but for GR/IR account profit center is taking form material master & for stock account profit center is taking from WBS element.
MIRO
Entry
Accounting Document number Entry View
5100000657
PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
31          100000     Ambuja Cement Ltd     -1,996.00     INR     V4
86          162101     GR/IR-Material     2,000.00     INR     V4     1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
40          254001     VAT Receivable     80     INR     V4
50          172103     TDS PAYABLE -194C     -42     INR
50          176101     WCT-TDS payable     -42     INR
Document number in Ledger View
PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
31          160100     CRS-Domestic Supp     -1,996.00     INR     V4     1001052002
86          162101     GR/IR-Material     2,000.00     INR     V4     1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
40          254001     VAT Receivable     80     INR     V4     1001052002
50          172103     TDS PAYABLE -194C     -42     INR          1001052002
50          176101     WCT-TDS payable     -42     INR          1001052002
In the MIRO Accounting Document profit center for [162101] GR/IR-Material A/C has taken from WBS element
Please note that we are using document splitting with Profit center is mandatory
We have created same scenario for Cost center. After posting the GRN profit center is taken from cost center for both GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO accounting documents.
Plez help

Hello
ANy suggestion for question & if solved do let me know

Difference in profit center (s_plo_86000030) report and billing report (Z )

Dear SAP GURUS
We have develped a billing report - z reprt - but the std profit center report -( S_PL0_8600030)
NOT matching with it in output? kindly advise me to check and see the logic on the z report so that
we can confirm the reason for difffernces ?
I mean how a functional consutlant can check the logic behind program ?
Edited by: johnrambo on Jul 6, 2010 8:05 AM

Dear,
Are you able to see the General Ledger View of that entry?
mukesh

What is the difference in the features between Cisco prime 1.2 and Cisco prime 1.4 ?

Dears,
Please i need to know what is the difference in the features between Cisco prime infrastructure 1.2 and Cisco prime 1.4.
Already i see the release note for each one but the release indicate only the New feature for every one. so i need to know the difference between them not new features.
Wait your kind feedback plz
Regards,

Hi,
New Features and Enhancements
The following topics describe new features and enhancements in Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.4.
Management Support for WLC Release 7.5
Support for 802.11ac Module
Support for Cisco AP 700
Policy Classification Engine
FlexConnect Audit Support
Autonomous AP Support
Client Stateful Switchover
Cable Modem Monitoring
Support for Secure File Transfer Protocol
and please go through the link and check the data sheet for further clearance.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/prime-infrastructure/datasheet-c78-729879.html

Profit center mandatory field in F-58 and F-48

Hello Experts,
We need to make profit center is mandatory field in the F-58, F-53 and F-48 while posting payment to vendor.
Kindly let us know is there any possibility to make required entry for the same.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Ratnam.

Hello Ajay,
Thanks for the replay, I used field Bank accounts field status group only for making profit center mandatory. Problem got solved now.
For Reference key mandatory field, I written validation for Required TCodes but Reference key field is not available in the FBCJ kept pending. The same problem is there in MIRO screen also, we are doing enhancement for fetching Ref1, 2, 3 fields the MIRO screen.
Regards,
Ratnam

Diffrence between core 2 due T and other like SP,P,SL

Hello
Can anyone clear me the difference between core2due processors come with T8400 to T9600 and other
P--,SP and SL
Thanks

welcome to the forum!
you may find the lenovo processor reference helpful.
ThinkStation C20
ThinkPad X1C · X220 · X60T · s30 · 600

Difference in GL Balances between two Standard Report fbl3n and fagll03

Hi ,
Mismatch of balances between two standard report ie.fbl3n and fagll03 . We are giving the complete example of what we are facing right now ... please go through the examples .
ENTRY NO. 1
We have posted one MIRO , Accounting Posting is as below : -
PK         Description    Amount
86         GR/IR             1000.00
31         Vendor           -800.00
50          TDS               -200.00
ENTRY NO. 2
We have Reversed the MIRO through MR8M , Accounting Posting was as below : -
PK         Description     Amount
21         Vendor             800.00
40          TDS                 200.00
96          GR/IR            -1000.00
But in Standard report FAGLL03 , .The line items of above twoi entries under GL " TDS " are showing in this way : -
Doc No.      PK      Ammount
Entry 1       50          -200.00
Entry 2       40          -200.00 -
> ?????
*OPEN ITEMS          - 400.00----
> ?????
Although in other Standard report FBL3N , the same are showing correctly as shown below
Doc No.      PK      Ammount
Entry 1       50          -200.00
Entry 2       40          +200.00
*OPEN ITEMS                0.00
PLEASE HELP
Regards
Soumitra Bhattacharya

Hi
FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) - this report is related to ledger reporting purpose. this reports is available after ECC 5.0.
FBL3N - is line item display - this is only GL reports (not in ledger reporting)
if you find any difference is values please check the report variant you are using and ledger you are activated.
hope this will help you.
Regards
Ram

Difference in generated WSDL between Weblogic 10.3.3 and JBoss 5.1

Hi all,
We have developed an web service based application using JAX-WS with WS-Security enabled in it. We followed below link for the implementation of WS-Security,
[http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws10/index.html]
And we have deployed the application in JBoss 5.1, tested it using SOAP UI passing the request to the Core application. We got the expected result.
When I try to deploy the application in weblogic 10.3.3, it is getting deployed and we are unable to pass the user credentials to it and hence the core application rejects the request since the username/password is not supplied.
I want to know how the web service application with WS-Security enabled can be deploy in Weblogic 10.3.3? Any documentation would be a great help.
And also we found that the creation of WSDL from JBoss 5.1 & Weblogic differ. We have used a WS-policy also into this, the WSDL generated by JBoss contains the information of the WS-policy we added.
But the generated WSDL from Weblogic 10.3.3 is missing those information!
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Only difference I see between the two generated WSDL is that,
For Weblogic, RI's version is Oracle JAX-WS 2.1.5.
For JBoss 5.1, it is, RI's version is JAX-WS RI 2.2.3-b01-
Will this have an impact on the generated WSDL?
Generated WSDL from JBoss:
<Changed the company name/product name>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- 
- 
- <definitions xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" xmlns:wsp="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy" xmlns:wsp1_2="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy" xmlns:wsam="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:tns="http://company.com/WARName" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" targetNamespace="http://company.com/WARName" name="ProductWebServicesImplService">
- <wsp1_2:Policy xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702" wsu:Id="UsernameToken">
- <sp:SupportingTokens>
- <wsp1_2:Policy>
<sp:UsernameToken sp:IncludeToken=".../IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient" />
</wsp1_2:Policy>
</sp:SupportingTokens>
</wsp1_2:Policy>
- <types>
- <xsd:schema>
<xsd:import namespace="http://company.com/WARName" schemaLocation="http://localhost:8080/WARName/services?xsd=1" />
</xsd:schema>
- <xsd:schema>
<xsd:import namespace="http://jaxb.dev.java.net/array" schemaLocation="http://localhost:8080/WARName/services?xsd=2" />
</xsd:schema>
</types>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomer">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer" />
</message>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomerResponse">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomerResponse" />
</message>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate" />
</message>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateResponse">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateResponse" />
</message>
- <portType name="ProductWebServicesImpl">
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer">
<input wsam:Action="http://company.com/WARName/ProductWebServicesImpl/CreateIndividualCustomerRequest" message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer" />
<output wsam:Action="http://company.com/WARName/ProductWebServicesImpl/CreateIndividualCustomerResponse" message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomerResponse" />
</operation>
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate">
<input wsam:Action="http://company.com/WARName/ProductWebServicesImpl/CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateRequest" message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate" />
<output wsam:Action="http://company.com/WARName/ProductWebServicesImpl/CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateResponse" message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateResponse" />
</operation>
</portType>
- <binding name="ProductWebServicesImplPortBinding" type="tns:ProductWebServicesImpl">
<wsp1_2:PolicyReference URI="#UsernameToken" />
<soap:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" style="document" />
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer">
<soap:operation soapAction="" />
- <input>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</input>
- <output>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</output>
</operation>
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate">
<soap:operation soapAction="" />
- <input>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</input>
- <output>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
- <service name="ProductWebServicesImplService">
- <port name="ProductWebServicesImplPort" binding="tns:ProductWebServicesImplPortBinding">
<soap:address location="http://localhost:8080/WARName/services" />
</port>
</service>
</definitions>
WSDL generated by Weblogic
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- 
- 
- <definitions xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:tns="http://company.com/WARName" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" targetNamespace="http://company.com/WARName" name="ProductWebServicesImplService">
- <types>
- <xsd:schema>
<xsd:import namespace="http://company.com/WARName" schemaLocation="http://machineIP:6601/WARNameSO/services?xsd=1" />
</xsd:schema>
- <xsd:schema>
<xsd:import namespace="http://jaxb.dev.java.net/array" schemaLocation="http://machineIP:6601/WARNameSO/services?xsd=2" />
</xsd:schema>
</types>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomer">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer" />
</message>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomerResponse">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomerResponse" />
</message>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate" />
</message>
- <message name="CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateResponse">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateResponse" />
</message>
- <portType name="ProductWebServicesImpl">
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer">
<input message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer" />
<output message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomerResponse" />
</operation>
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate">
<input message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate" />
<output message="tns:CreateIndividualCustomer_ValidateResponse" />
</operation>
</portType>
- <binding name="ProductWebServicesImplPortBinding" type="tns:ProductWebServicesImpl">
<soap:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" style="document" />
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer">
<soap:operation soapAction="" />
- <input>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</input>
- <output>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</output>
</operation>
- <operation name="CreateIndividualCustomer_Validate">
<soap:operation soapAction="" />
- <input>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</input>
- <output>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
- <service name="ProductWebServicesImplService">
- <port name="ProductWebServicesImplPort" binding="tns:ProductWebServicesImplPortBinding">
<soap:address location="http://machineIP:6601/WARNameSO/services" />
</port>
</service>
</definitions>
Edited by: 943018 on Jun 26, 2012 9:44 PM

Sadly you're correct about the previous developers not fully using the skinning framework. Some of it has been done correctly using a skin - such as the icon shown when required=true has been set (.AFRequiredIconStyle). Unfortunately the label width is being set from our custom CSS file, rather than from a skin. It looks like I'll have to remove our custom CSS and try to recreate the appearance using the skin from scratch.

Difference for OAG Standards between OAGIS 9.5.1 and 7.2.1

Hi,
I was looking for any document which can show the difference between the OAGIS 9.5.1 standard for BOD - 'Process Invoices' as compared to OAGIS 7.2.1 ?
Please let us know or give pointers as to where can I get this information.
Regards,
Megha

Hi Megha,
The differences are significant between OAGIS 7.2 and anything greater than OAGIS 8.0. In 8.0, they switched from DTD based schemas to XML Schema (XSD's). All of the elements were renamed to take advantage of the XSD capability to support more than 8 character names, and component based structures were introduced, so that things like Address could be re-used across multiple documents and multiple address types (Bill-To, Ship-To, etc..). They did keep USERAREA extensions, but also introduced overlay extensions and use some of the most complex features of XML Schema. In OAGIS 9.0, they started merging in the ISO standard definitions for components, which provides more standardization across different applications. The differences between 7.2 and 9.5 are significant.
R,
Scott

How to find the difference in BI Content between SAP ERP 4.7 and ECC 6.0

We are looking at upgrading our SAP system from 4.71 to ECC 6.0, and I have been tasked with determining what new data may become available in our BW system after the upgrade. I was wondering if there was a site that would tell me what new datasources/infoproviders are made available after an upgrade to ECC 6.0.
I do not need to see the list of all Business Content in ECC 6.0, just what has changed.
Also, the type of upgrade we are looking at performing is a "Technical Upgrade", which presumably just upgrades the SAP back end without affecting the front end. Can someone confirm that the new BW content will then be available after a technical upgrade?
Thanks
Michael
PS - our BW system has been on version 2004s for two years now.
Edited by: Michael Frank on Feb 3, 2010 3:07 PM

Hi,
http://service.sap.com/erp
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
Click on Search
Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
-Vikram

What's the difference between END-TO-END SSL and other SSL?

Could anyone summarize all of the differences?
Thanks a lot! Points guaranteed.

Hi,
SSL end-to-end means that the web dispatcher is just forwarding the
HTTPS requests to the backend system without unpacking / decrypting the data.
This can be configured by icm/server_port_<XX> = ...,PROT=ROUTER,..
To be able to configure the ROUTER protocol on the web dispatcher you also
must have configured HTTPS / SSL on the relevant backend system.
Configuring SSL "only" means that the web dispatcher is listening to HTTPS and you can decide with the relevant parameters, if the communication to the backend is HTTP or if it is again reencrypted using HTTPS.
This would end up in using the parameter icm/server_port_<xx> = ...,PROT=HTTPS,....
Kind Regards
Thomas Alt

Differences between 10G intallations for vista and other windows systems

I need Informations about how the installationfiles for vista are differing from the files to install oracle on other windows systems.
And why can't i simply install Oracle Database 10g release 2 (10.2) for Microsoft Windows on a Windows Vista System.
Message was edited by:
user585666

Because Microsoft has changed the API with Vista - the system calls that programs such as Oracle (and Symantec, Word Perfect, and so on) use to performs their operations.
It is a strange thing indeed that things stop working when a program (such as Oracle) asks "fetch me data from disk" and the operating system says "fetch has been changed to get and I no longer respond to fetch"
Also because Microsoft has changed the security model, and requests made by Oracle are now denied due to insufficient, or differences in, security.
An analogy - you have a device with a plug to use in North America. Why can you not simply plug it in to the wall socket in other countries?
The information you need should probably come from Microsoft, not Oracle.

Difference of profit center between ledger 0 (FI-GL) and other ledgers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for