Differences in hours between FBL3N and KSB1

Hello,
I am looking into an issue where the hours posted in FBL3N do not match what is showing up in KSB1. Payroll postings include a number of hours, which can be negative or positive, along with a negative or positive dollar amount. The postings are correct when we look at them in FBL3N. However, management is using KSB1 to get totals for generating certain payroll-related estimates. In KSB1, the dollar amounts are showing up correctly, but the hours are not. All hours are showing up in KSB1 as positive, resulting in totals that are larger than they should be. Does anyone know why this is happening? Is there a setting somewhere in configuration or for KSB1 that needs to be changed? Or is there a different report other than KSB1 than can provide the same information (but correctly)?
Thanks,
April Erickson

There is a non-obvious menu at the top right hand side of Bridge that selects whether Bridge displays the camera generated jpeg within the raw file (your preferred rendering above) or the ACR version (the warmer redder image). I set mine to High Quality so the Bridge version always matches the ACR, even if it takes slightly longer to render.
Canon has its own algorithm for conversion and AFAIK they don't share it with Adobe. My advice is change the Bridge setting so that the two match, and try the other camera profiles under ACR Camera Calibration to see if one is more pleasing than the stock Adobe Standard. Alternatively, you can get into modifying/creating your own camera profiles, but that will take some more study and tools, such as using the DNG Profile Editor.
Richard Southworth

Similar Messages

Difference between FBL3N and KSB1

Hi,
Which can be the reasons of the difference between FBL3N and KSB1.
I understand that these reports have to have the same value.
Regards,
Pablo

Hi,
FBL3N gives the GL line Items, which includes GL accounts created with Cost Element as well as without Cost Element.
Whereas KSB1 includes line items which were generated for Cost Elements only.
Hence if there is a Balance Sheet Account, You will not have a Cost Element created for the same. The entry will appear in FBL3N for that account, where as you will not have it in KSB1.
Hope you got the difference.
Appreciate if you could award points if you find this information helpful.
Regards,
Venkat

Workflows: How to set a workflow variable that is the difference in hours between now and a created date

I'm trying to create a variable that contains the number of hours between the item created date and Now. When i use TODAY, it seems to set the time at 12:00 rather than the time now - so that throws the hours off. Any ideas?
ajw

Hi ajw,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to calculate the hours between the item created date and now.
It seems to be not an OOB way to implement your requirement, to get the current time, you need to create a custom workflow activity for SharePoint 2010 workflow. About creating custom workflow activity, you can refer to the links below:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh872790(v=office.14).aspx
http://blogs-sharepoint-ashutoshmisra.blogspot.in/2013/02/create-custom-workflow-action-for.html
Or, you can use a third party solution to achieve your requriement.
Here are some similar posts for you to take a look at:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/e93ea37a-df09-4cbf-a58d-5d4def3d3d42/how-to-compare-time-in-sharepoint-designer-2010sp-2010-workflow?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
http://blog-sharepoint.blogspot.in/2009/03/get-current-time-in-sharepoint-designer.html
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Function Module for calculating hours between dates and their times.

Hi all,
Is there any standard function module for calculating the time difference in hours between two dates with start and end times.
Regards,
Sudipto.

Sudipto,
How're you ????????????????????
Check out the following Function Module:
SD_DATETIME_DIFFERENCE (Give the difference in Days and Time for 2 dates)
Regards,
Abir
Don't forget to award Points *

Difference in value Between BW and R/3

Hi,
We are in the process of validating reports .We have observed difference in value for credit and debit amount fields in BW and for the same data is coming from standard data source 0EN_JVA_2 (Joint venture: Actual line item using delta extraction) we have done full data load. In the data source the data coming from a single field and that is spited based on debit/credit indicator in R/3.
I need your valuable input on where the problem is for the difference of value between BW and R/3.
Regards
Deva

Hi,
Is there any filterations in the IP?
Any data packet deletion activity in the start rountine?
Any update rule for the key figure is having routine with modifiying the value?
Kindly check.
In case if you are seeing number of records, always aggregation happens.
If the difference is in terms of quantity of the key figure values, kindly check the above three.
Kindly come to us so that we can suggest
Hope this helps
Janardhan Kumar

Amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting

Hi,
After we run 1KEK for ARAP transfer to profit center there is amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting for customere reconciliation account. We checked F.5D and rerun 1KEK this issue still exit.
Any idea for it? Thanks.

hi Kyle,
thanks for the effort, but it wasn't the thing i asked for ...
what i would like to find out is:
if CO area settings are set w/o profit centers, why the system still demands profit center assignment with cost center master data (ie.)
well, i can always turn off the message, but this isn't the solution i want to use ...
i will rather open one PC (along with dummy, of course) even though those are not used for the customer ... although, this will not solve statistical posting to cc with cost element category 11 ...
d.

Is there any difference in quality between mp4 and m4v?

Is there any difference in quality between mp4 and m4v? I am figuring out how best to save old VCR files. Is the 264 category the best?

So, what would that software be? Anything that I mentioned, e.g., iMovie? Any Video Converter?
I'm a Mac user so I want files that play "natively" in QT X, QT 7, QL, iPod Touch, iPhone, iPad, and/or TV players. This means I want the H.264/AAC compressed data in MOV, MP4, or M4V file containers. I can use QT 7 Pro, MPEG Streamclip, and /or QT X to move MPEG-4/AAC compressed data to MOV file containers, MPEG Streamclip to movie M4V and MOV MPEG-4/AAC data to MP4 file containers, and Subler to move MP4 or MOV MPEG-4 AVC/AAC/AC3/Chapter data to M4V file containers. This is strictly a simple "copy" operation and no recompression of data is involved. (I.e., the quality is not changed.)
iMovie is a video editor and it forces an export conversion of your project once completed which can degrade quality. Have never used the Any Video Converter so I don't know if it has an audio and/or video "passthrough" feature for data already in a compatible compression formats. If it doesn't then any conversion it makes has the potential to degrade video content.
As to AVI, this is a legacy file container abandoned by Microsoft a dozen years ago in favor of their modernized WMV compression format/file type products. Compared to MKV, AVI is an outmoded/out-of-date container which I don't recommend you use unless you are a glutton for punishment. However, if you must use it, then you might try the AvidMux app. It can "copy" compatible content to a number of file container types—including AVI and MKV. Just don't blame me if its use creates more problems than it solves on current Mac systems.

Difference in speed between i5 and Core 2 Duo (same GHz)?

My two-year old MacBook Pro has a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor and 4GB RAM.
The cheapest MacBook Pro introduced today has a 2.4GHz i5 processor with 4GB RAM.
Anyone have any idea what the speed difference might be between these two? Approximately?
And does software have to be re-written to take advantage of the i5? In other words: What do I stand to gain if upgrading today?

Read this page and it should answer your questions.
http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/performance.html
Check out the new remodeled MacOSG website! 24-hour Apple-related news & support.
 MacOSG: An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast  Follow us on Twitter: MacOSG

Differences xml-db between R10g2 and R11_2 ?

HI,
there are differences in xml-db between R10g2 and R11_2 ?
where I can find about it
regards
Edited by: astramare on Feb 17, 2011 3:04 PM

ok:
we have changed our DB from R10.2 to R11_2
by using DataPump
we do create a lot of different schema-based xml-Data
by using DBMS_XMLGEN
from a sql/xml-function based View
like
xmldoc := DBMS_XMLGEN.getXML(ctx);
xmldoc_xmlType:=(xmltype(xmldoc)) ;
xmldoc_xmlType.isSchemaValid
dbms_xslprocessor.clob2file
all other xml_schema do work fine after migration
with this one following exception
while validate the output inside a package
we get an error
LSX-00285: Referenzierter Schlüssel "405986.0" ist nicht definiert
to look at differences
I have identical created
one XML-output in the ( old ) 10gR2 -DB
and
one XML-output in the ( new ) 11R2 - DB
both I can ok validate against the same schema inside XML-Spy ( Vers 2006 )
but
the R10_2 XMLType does ok validate in DB 10gR2
the R11_2 XMLType does not validate in R11 !
by view the xml-data-files in XMLSpy or another editor
there obvious a difference:
In the SQL/XML-select I work with .extract
the xml-output from R10 is correct in a xml-like structure
the xml-output from R11 is not
both data-file have the identical ascii-words
but different size in kByte
the call to register the schema in R10_2 and R11_2 is identical:
dbms_xmlschema.registerSchema(
schemaurl => vschemaurl,
schemadoc => xsd_file,
local => FALSE,
gentypes => TRUE,
genbean => FALSE,
gentables => TRUE,
force => FALSE,
owner => dbuser
,CSID => nls_charset_id('AL32UTF8')
the xml-schemas looks :
R10
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.abcde.de/nsdir"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
xdb:flags="311"
xdb:schemaURL="http://www.abcde.de/nsdis/SCHEMABEZ.XSD"
xdb:schemaOwner="USER"
xdb:numProps="36">
R11:
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.abcde.de/nsdir"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
-- new ?!
xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true"
-- flag ?!
xdb:flags="8503"
xdb:schemaURL="http://www.abcde.de/nsdis/SCHEMABEZ.XSD"
xdb:schemaOwner="USER"
xdb:numProps="36">
may be its a problem inside the data in the Views ?
or a difference between R10 and r11 ?
regards

Finding difference of Hours between two dates

I need logic to find the difference of number of hours between any two dates excluding saturdays & sundays. Please provide PLSQL code.

my dear
this is the pl/sql to create on db.
| | This function it will created on the data if you like.
| | the input parameter for this function is two date .
| | you can add more feature on it because turn it felixable eg.
| | you can execlude varaible days from paramteres....
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION GET_HOURS(P_FROM_DATE IN DATE ,
P_TO_DATE IN DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE ,
P_EXECLUDE IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT '17' ) RETURN NUMBER IS
V_CURR_DATE DATE := P_FROM_DATE ;
V_ALL_DAYS NUMBER := 0 ;
V_NET_HOURS NUMBER := 0 ;
V_FROM_JUL NUMBER := TO_CHAR(P_FROM_DATE,'J');
V_TO_JUL NUMBER := TO_CHAR(P_TO_DATE,'J');
BEGIN
FOR R IN V_FROM_JUL..V_TO_JUL LOOP
IF INSTR(P_EXECLUDE,TO_CHAR(V_CURR_DATE,'D')) = 0 THEN
V_ALL_DAYS := V_ALL_DAYS + 1 ;
END IF;
V_CURR_DATE := V_CURR_DATE+ 1 ;
END LOOP;
V_NET_HOURS := V_ALL_DAYS * 24 ;
RETURN(V_NET_HOURS);
END;
-- this is for test senario
SELECT GET_HOURS(SYSDATE-30) FROM DUAL ;
SELECT GET_HOURS(SYSDATE-30,SYSDATE,'127') FROM DUAL;
SELECT GET_HOURS(SYSDATE-30,SYSDATE,'0') FROM DUAL; -- to execlude zero days.

Does anyone know what triggers the switch between text and iMessage in the middle of a conversation? Are there any differences in billing between text and iMessage?

In the middle of a text conversation between another iOS 5.0 iPhone user and myself, the conversation elements switched back and forth several times between Text and iMessage. The phone actually tracked it and put little lines indicating the switch, and my comments changed from green to blue and back again. I can't think of anything I changed in the middle of the conversation. I was outside WiFi range, using the Cell network at the time. Now I tried it again, while i'm on WiFI and the messages are Text (green) again.

1. Windows 8.1 Enterprise w Update is the best. It allows you for sideloading in corporate environment without additional tools and licenses.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/jj874388.aspx
2. N series is for EU (without IE).
3. Profesional is fine, but you will need some tools to achieve the same functionality that you have in "pack" Enterprise.
4. VL is volume license, a type of license for multiple computers (to say it simply)
5. MSDN forum is better alternative for problems like this.
6. Attached to MSDN are licenses or at least references to web resources. Read license agreements carefully and let your installation and use follow the license.
Rgds
Milos

What are the main differences in features between FCP and FCE?

I'm buying filmmaking equipment for my teenage son, who has shown himself to be serious about getting started making shorts. One big decision (regarding costs and $$$ allocation for other system elements such as the computer and camcorder)is whether to get Final Cut Pro (studio version) or Final Cut Express. He has used Final Cut in several camps and film school programs. Feedback will be most appreciated!

FCP can't be bought by itself, however Final Cut Studio includes Color, Motion, and DVD Studio Pro.... FCE will not edit any format except DV and HDV. FCP will edit most every format. FCP is keyframeable, where FCE really isn't. There really is a ton of difference between the two apps. FCE has no media management, has fewer effects, etc... One's an enthusiasts' program and the other (Final Cut Studio) is a full professional suite of software... it's certainly worth the difference, but might be more than you want to spend. FCE is a subset of code taken from FCP, so learning it will help with learning FCP... the interface is nearly identical.
Jerry

Is there a difference in Photomerge between CC and Elements?

Hello! I have a quick product question - I have been using Lightroom for some time now and am very comfortable with the workflow I have going. I shoot quite a bit of film, and recently have been "scanning" my 6x6 negatives with my DSLR and a macro lens. I downloaded a trial of Elements 13 to see how the Photomerge option works. Long story short, it works great. Now I am curious if there are any differences between the Photomerge option in Photoshop CC vs Photoshop Elements 13. The only difference I can come up with is that the CC Photomerge has an option directly from Lightroom and Elements does not (merge to Panorama still greyed out with Elements installed). Thank you for your great products, and I truly appreciate your insight.

Most people either use one app or the other, and have very limited knowledge of the one they don't use. But from what I can find from a quick look round the web, they seem to be the same.
Review: Photoshop Elements 13 gets Photomerge and content-aware fill | Macworld

Differences in colours between Photoshop and Bridge

I have a question that have puzzled me for a while. There's some differences between the colours in bridge and in photoshop. When they're previewed in Bridge it has nice warm and sligtly desaturated feel to it. When i open the RAW file in Photoshop it gets much pale and red. Why is that? The same thing happens when i shoot the picture and the first preview shows the warm and desaturated version, but when i see the picture again it's back to the pale and red version. Same thing happens, when i open it in Ligthroom. When i click on a picture, it shows the warm and desaturated version, but quickly return to the other one, after the picture is loaded.
I really like the warm and slightly desaturated version, so is there a way i can keep it, or bring it back? I know it has something to do with the colour conversion, that happens in the camera, but i can't figure out how to use it.
I'm shooting with a Canon EOS 5d mkIII. See a screenshot of the issue.
Please help me...
Lars

There is a non-obvious menu at the top right hand side of Bridge that selects whether Bridge displays the camera generated jpeg within the raw file (your preferred rendering above) or the ACR version (the warmer redder image). I set mine to High Quality so the Bridge version always matches the ACR, even if it takes slightly longer to render.
Canon has its own algorithm for conversion and AFAIK they don't share it with Adobe. My advice is change the Bridge setting so that the two match, and try the other camera profiles under ACR Camera Calibration to see if one is more pleasing than the stock Adobe Standard. Alternatively, you can get into modifying/creating your own camera profiles, but that will take some more study and tools, such as using the DNG Profile Editor.
Richard Southworth

Difference in colour between 2012 and 2010 proc

I know that newer 2012 process tries to save detail in the highlights (different tonal curve I guess), and has much better controls in Basic develop module so I was eager to edit my newest shots in LR4.
However, I wasn't so thrilled how it rendered bright pinkish colours.
Two examples below are cropped parts of a photograph, have default values, using Adobe Standard profile, from Canon7D raw file.
Image done in 2012 process, default values.
And this one is 2010:
It doesn't seem a big deal when viewed in the web browser on the white background, but the difference is very obvious when editing those in LR. Notice that 2012 file has a "better" histogram with "safe" highlight zone.
However, it altered the colours as well and histogram shows that too. Pink blouse seem more washed out. I can assure you that process 2010 file is much more closer to the original scene, original colours.
So... can I do anything about this? Can it be corrected in final LR4 version? Sure I can raise the saturation in the pink channel, but that will raise other, well saturated, areas as well and I won't get the same result like in 2010 proc. file.

I've been testing the "2012 Process" using a Macbeth color checker image (raw). My first goal was to determine what settings in LR/2012 would best match CS5/ACR6/2010. I was not trying to preserve the 2010 process, just want to better understand the difference.
First pass just using the defaults in both versions resulted in differences of 3 to 5 points in the RGB values of the 24 patches of the colorchecker. On some patches, one of the RGB values might be the same, but at least one was different by 3 to 5 points. The 2012 version looked lighter overall, so I suspected that the difference was due to tones (as Jeff Schewe has suggested).
So by trial and error I kept reprocessing the LR4/2012 version, decreasing only the Blacks slider. When I got to a setting of Blacks -8, the black colorchecker patch finally matched all 3 RGB values. All the other patches were very close, with a few differences of only 1 point in RGB values, and usually in only 1 value (red or green or blue, but not all three)
However, there was 1 exception. The Blue value in the colorchecker's Yellow patch had a 7 point difference. All the other primary patches were exact matches.
My colorchecker test images were from a Canon 5D2, processed under the Adobe Standard profile, rendered as 16bit TIFs in Adobe98 colorspace, and stacked as Photoshop layers to read the RGB values.
So I suspect what many are perceiving as color differences are real differences, but are caused by the basic difference in tonal rendition between the 2012 and 2010 processes. For the OP, please reprocess your pinks in LR4 with some different black settings and see if you get closer to your original 2010 version. I'd be curious to hear the results.

Differences in hours between FBL3N and KSB1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for